Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response

Prevention and repair of DNA damage is essential for maintenance of genomic stability and cell survival. DNA replication during S-phase can be a source of DNA damage if endogenous or exogenous stresses impair the progression of replication forks. It has become increasingly clear that DNA-damage-response pathways do not only respond to the presence of damaged DNA, but also modulate DNA replication dynamics to prevent DNA damage formation during S-phase. Such observations may help explain the developmental defects or cancer predisposition caused by mutations in DNA-damage-response genes. The present review focuses on molecular mechanisms by which DNA-damage-response pathways control and promote replication dynamics in vertebrate cells. In particular, DNA damage pathways contribute to proper replication by regulating replication initiation, stabilizing transiently stalled forks, promoting replication restart and facilitating fork movement on difficult-to-replicate templates. If replication fork progression fails to be rescued, this may lead to DNA damage and genomic instability via nuclease processing of aberrant fork structures or incomplete sister chromatid separation during mitosis.     

Clustered DNA damage induced by heavy ion particles.

Clustered DNA damage (locally multiply damaged site) is thought to be a critical lesion caused by ionizing radiation, and high LET radiation such as heavy ion particles is believed to produce high yields of such damage. Since heavy ion particles are major components of ionizing radiation in a space environment, it is important to clarify the chemical nature and biological consequences of clustered DNA damage and its relationship to the health effects of exposure to high LET particles in humans. The concept of clustered DNA damage emerged around 1980, but only recently has become the subject of experimental studies. In this article, we review methods used to detect clustered DNA damage, and the current status of our understanding of the chemical nature and repair of clustered DNA damage.     

Protein phosphatases and the dynamics of the DNA damage response

Comment on: Freeman AK, et al. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:736-47.     

RAD54 forms DNA repair foci in response to DNA damage in living plant cells

Plants have various defense mechanisms against environmental stresses that induce DNA damage. Genetic and biochemical analyses have revealed the sensing and signaling of DNA damage, but little is known about subnuclear dynamics in response to DNA damage in living plant cells. Here, we observed that the chromatin remodeling factor RAD54, which is involved in DNA repair via the homologous recombination pathway, formed subnuclear foci (termed RAD54 foci) in Arabidopsis thaliana after induction of DNA double‐strand breaks. The appearance of RAD54 foci was dependent on the ATAXIA‐TELANGIECTASIA MUTATED–SUPPRESSOR OF GAMMA RESPONSE 1 pathway, and RAD54 foci were co‐localized with γH2AX signals. Laser irradiation of a subnuclear area demonstrated that in living cells RAD54 was specifically accumulated at the damaged site. In addition, the formation of RAD54 foci showed specificity for cell type and region. We conclude that RAD54 foci correspond to DNA repair foci in A. thaliana.     

Spatiotemporal dynamics of regulatory protein recruitment at DNA damage sites

Mammalian cells are constantly threatened by multiple types of DNA lesions arising from various sources like irradiation, environmental agents, replication errors or by-products of the normal cellular metabolism. If not readily detected and repaired these lesions can lead to cell death or to the transformation of cells giving rise to life-threatening diseases like cancer. Multiple specialized repair pathways have evolved to preserve the genetic integrity of a cell. The increasing number of DNA damage sensors, checkpoint regulators, and repair factors identified in the numerous interconnected repair pathways raises the question of how DNA repair is coordinated. In the last decade, various methods have been developed that allow the induction of DNA lesions and subsequent real-time analysis of repair factor assembly at DNA repair sites in living cells. This combination of biophysical and molecular cell biology methods has yielded interesting new insights into the order and kinetics of protein recruitment and identified regulatory sequences and selective loading platforms for the efficient restoration of the genetic and epigenetic integrity of mammalian cells.     

RAD51 foci formation in response to DNA damage is modulated by TIP49

Chromatin modification plays an important role in modulating the access of homologous recombination proteins to the sites of DNA damage. TIP49 is highly conserved component of chromatin modification/remodeling complexes, but its involvement in homologous recombination repair in mammalian cells has not been examined in details. In the present communication we studied the role of TIP49 in recruitment of the key homologous recombination protein RAD51 to sites of DNA damage. RAD51 redistribution to chromatin and nuclear foci formation induced by double-strand breaks and interstrand crosslinks were followed under conditions of TIP49 depletion by RNA interference. TIP49 silencing reduced RAD51 recruitment to chromatin and nuclear foci formation to about 50% of that of the control. Silencing of TIP48, which is closely related to TIP49, induced a similar reduction in RAD51 foci formation. RAD51 foci reduction in TIP49-silenced cells was not a result of defective DNA damage checkpoint signaling as judged by the normal histone H2AX phosphorylation and cell cycle distribution. Treatment with the histone deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate restored RAD51 foci formation in the TIP49-depleted cells. The results suggest that as a constituent of chromatin modification complexes TIP49 may facilitate the access of the repair machinery to the sites of DNA damage.     

丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白磷酸酶与DNA损伤应答

DNA损伤应答(DNA damage response,DDR)是维持基因组稳定性的核心机制,对DDR的研究不仅有助于阐明癌症发生发展的机理,同时也为癌症治疗和抗癌新药开发提供生物学基础。蛋白质翻译后修饰,尤其是蛋白激酶介导的磷酸化修饰和蛋白磷酸酶介导的去磷酸化修饰,参与调控绝大多数的生命活动过程,包括DDR。对蛋白激酶ATM/ATR/CHK2/CHK1介导的DDR的研究已经比较透彻,但是对蛋白磷酸酶在DDR中的功能研究还有待加强和深入。比较全面地综述丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白磷酸酶在DDR中的功能并探讨在抗癌新药开发中的前景。     

Quantitative protein network monitoring in response to DNA damage

Conventional molecular biology techniques have identified a large number of cell signaling pathways; however, the importance of these pathways often varies, depending on factors such as treatment type, dose, time after treatment, and cell type. Here, we describe a technique using "reverse-phase" protein lysate microarrays (RPAs) to acquire multiple dimensions of information on protein dynamics in response to DNA damage. Whole-cell lysates from three cellular stress treatments (IR, UV, and ADR) were collected at four doses per treatment, and each, in turn, at 10 time points, resulting in a single-slide RPA consisting of 10,240 features, including replicates. The dynamic molecular profile of 18 unique protein species was compared to phenotypic fate by FACS analysis for corresponding stress conditions. Our initial quantitative results in this new platform confirmed that (1) there is clear stress dose-response effect in p53 protein and (2) a comparison of the rates of increase of p21 and Cyclin D3/p53-Ser15 in response to DNA damage may be associated with the pattern of DNA content. This method, offering a quantitative time-course monitoring of protein expression levels, can provide an experimental reference for developing mathematical models of cell signaling dynamics. Although the present study focuses on the DNA damage-repair pathway, the technique is generally useful to the study of protein signaling.     

Beyond ATM: the protein kinase landscape of the DNA damage response

The DNA of all organisms is constantly subjected to damaging agents, both exogenous and endogenous. One extremely harmful lesion is the double-strand break (DSB), which activates a massive signaling network - the DNA damage response (DDR). The chief activator of the DSB response is the ATM protein kinase, which phosphorylates numerous key players in its various branches. Recent phosphoproteomic screens have extended the scope of damage-induced phosphorylations beyond the direct ATM substrates. We review the evidence for the involvement of numerous other protein kinases in the DDR, obtained from documentation of specific pathways as well as high-throughput screens. The emerging picture of the protein phosphorylation landscape in the DDR broadens the current view on the role of this protein modification in the maintenance of genomic stability. Extensive cross-talk between many of these protein kinases forms an interlaced signaling network that spans numerous cellular processes. Versatile protein kinases in this network affect pathways that are different from those they have been identified with to date. The DDR appears to be one of the most extensive signaling responses to cellular stimuli.     

Replication protein A phosphorylation and the cellular response to DNA damage

Defects in cellular DNA metabolism have a direct role in many human disease processes. Impaired responses to DNA damage and basal DNA repair have been implicated as causal factors in diseases with DNA instability like cancer, Fragile X and Huntington's. Replication protein A (RPA) is essential for multiple processes in DNA metabolism including DNA replication, recombination and DNA repair pathways (including nucleotide excision, base excision and double-strand break repair). RPA is a single-stranded DNA-binding protein composed of subunits of 70-, 32- and 14-kDa. RPA binds ssDNA with high affinity and interacts specifically with multiple proteins. Cellular DNA damage causes the N-terminus of the 32-kDa subunit of human RPA to become hyper-phosphorylated. Current data indicates that hyper-phosphorylation causes a change in RPA conformation that down-regulates activity in DNA replication but does not affect DNA repair processes. This suggests that the role of RPA phosphorylation in the cellular response to DNA damage is to help regulate DNA metabolism and promote DNA repair.     

The kinetochore protein Bub1 participates in the DNA damage response

The DNA damage response (DDR) and the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) are two critical mechanisms by which mammalian cells maintain genome stability. There is a growing body of evidence that DDR elements and SAC components crosstalk. Here we report that Bub1 (budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1), one of the critical kinetochore proteins essential for SAC, is required for optimal DDRs. We found that knocking-down Bub1 resulted in prolonged H2AX foci and comet tail formation as well as hypersensitivity in response to ionizing radiation (IR). Further, we found that Bub1-mediated Histone H2A Threonine 121 phosphorylation was induced after IR in an ATM-dependent manner. We demonstrated that ATM phosphorylated Bub1 on serine 314 in response to DNA damage in vivo. Finally, we showed that ATM-mediated Bub1 serine 314 phosphorylation was required for IR-induced Bub1 activation and for the optimal DDR. Together, we elucidate the molecular mechanism of DNA damage-induced Bub1 activation and highlight a critical role of Bub1 in DDR.     

Dimer exchange and cleavage specificity of the DNA damage response protein UmuD

The cellular response to DNA damage in Escherichia coli is controlled in part by the activity of the umuD gene products. The full-length dimeric UmuD₂ is the initial product that is expressed shortly after the induction of the SOS response and inhibits bacterial mutagenesis, allowing for error-free repair to occur. Over time, the slow auto-cleavage of UmuD₂ to UmuD′₂ promotes mutagenesis to ensure cell survival. The intracellular levels of UmuD₂ and UmuD′₂ are further regulated by degradation in vivo, returning the cell to a non-mutagenic state. To further understand the dynamic regulatory roles of the umuD gene products, we monitored the kinetics of exchange and cleavage of the UmuD₂ and UmuD′₂ homodimers as well as of the UmuDD′ heterodimer under equilibrium conditions. We found that the heterodimer is the preferred but not exclusive protein form, and that both the heterodimer and homodimers exhibit slow exchange kinetics which is further inhibited in the presence of interacting partner DinB. In addition, the heterodimer efficiently cleaves to form UmuD′₂. Together, this work reveals an intricate UmuD lifecycle that involves dimer exchange and cleavage in the regulation of the DNA damage response.     

The DNA damage response pathways： at the crossroad of protein modifications

Post-translational modifications play a crucial role in coordinating cellular response to DNA damage. Recent evidence suggests an interplay between multiple protein modifications, including phosphorylation, ubiquitylation, acetylation and sumoylation, that combine to propagate the DNA damage signal to elicit cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, apoptosis and senescence. Utility of specific post-translational modifiers allows temporal and spatial control over protein relo-calization and interactions, and may represent a means for trans-regulatory activation of protein activities. The ability to recognize these specific modifiers also underscores the capacity for signal amplification, a crucial step for the maintenance of genomic stability and tumor prevention. Here we have summarized recent findings that highlight the complexity of post-translational modifications in coordinating the DNA damage response, with emphasis on the DNA damage signaling cascade.     

Analysis of ionizing radiation-induced foci of DNA damage repair proteins

Repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination requires an extensive set of proteins. Among these proteins are Rad51 and Mre11, which are known to re-localize to sites of DNA damage into nuclear foci. Ionizing radiation-induced foci can be visualized by immuno-staining. Published data show a large variation in the number of foci-positive cells and number of foci per nucleus for specific DNA repair proteins. The experiments described here demonstrate that the time after induction of DNA damage influenced not only the number of foci-positive cells, but also the size of the individual foci. The dose of ionizing radiation influenced both the number of foci-positive cells and the number of foci per nucleus. Furthermore, ionizing radiation-induced foci formation depended on the cell cycle stage of the cells and the protein of interest that was investigated. Rad51 and Mre11 foci seemed to be mutually exclusive, though a small subset of cells did show co-localization of these proteins, which suggests a possible cooperation between the proteins at a specific moment during DNA repair.