Evolution and function of MADS‐box genes involved in orchid floral development

Orchids are known for their beauty and complexity of flower and ecological strategies. The evolution in orchid floral morphology, structure, and physiological properties has held the fascination of botanists for centuries, from Darwin through to the present. In floral studies, MADS‐box genes contributing to the now famous ABCDE model of floral organ identity control have dominated conceptual thinking. The sophisticated orchid floral organization offers an opportunity to discover new variant genes and different levels of complexity to the ABCDE model. Recently, several remarkable research reports on orchid MADS‐box genes, especially B‐class MADS‐box genes, have revealed the evolutionary track and important functions on orchid floral development. Diversification and fixation of both paleoAP3 gene sequences and expression profiles might be explained by subfunctionalization and even neofunctionalization. Knowledge about MADS‐box genes encoding ABCDE functions in orchids will give insights into the highly evolved floral morphogenetic networks of orchids.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">AOM3</Emphasis> and<Emphasis Type="Italic"> AOM4</Emphasis>: two MADS box genes expressed in reproductive structures of<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Asparagus officinalis</Emphasis>

The MADS box genes participate in different steps of vegetative and reproductive plant development, including the most important phases of the reproductive process. Here we describe the isolation and characterisation of two Asparagus officinalis MADS box genes, AOM3 and AOM4. The deduced AOM3 protein shows the highest degree of similarity with ZAG3 and ZAG5 of maize, OsMADS6 of rice and AGL6 of Arabidopsis thaliana. The deduced AOM4 protein shows the highest degree of similarity with AOM1 of asparagus, the SEP proteins of Arabidopsis and the rice proteins OsMADS8, OsMADS45 and OsMADS7. The high level of identity between AOM1 and AOM4 made impossible the preparation of probes specific for one single gene, so the hybridisation signal previously described for AOM1 is probably due to the expression of both genes. The expression profile of AOM3 and AOM1/AOM4 during flower development is identical, and similar to that of the SEP genes. Asparagus genes, however, are expressed not only in flower organs, but also in the different meristem present on the apical region of the shoot during the flowering season: the apical meristem and the three lateral meristems emerging from the leaf axillary region that will give rise to flowers and lateral inflorescences during flowering season, and to phylloclades and branches during the subsequent vegetative phase. The expression of AOM3 and AOM1/AOM4 in these meristems appears to be correlated with the reproductive function of the apex as the hybridisation signal disappears when the apex switches to vegetative function.     

Characterization of oil palm MADS box genes in relation to the mantled flower abnormality

In vitro propagation of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) frequently induces a somaclonal variant called ‘mantled’ abnormality, in which the stamens of both male and female flowers are transformed into carpels. This leads to a reduced yield or complete loss of the harvest of palm oil. The high frequency of the abnormality in independent lines and the high reversal rate suggest that it is due to an epigenetic change. The type of morphological changes suggest that it involves homeotic MADS box genes that regulate the identity of the flower whorls. We have isolated a number of MADS box genes from oil palm inflorescences by a MADS box-directed mRNA display approach. The isolated partial cDNAs included genes that were likely to function at the initial stages of flowering as well as genes that may function in determination of the inflorescence and the identity of the flower whorls. For four genes that were homologous to genes known to affect the reproductive parts of the flower, full length cDNAs were isolated. These were a B-type MADS box gene which may function in the determination of stamen formation, a C-type gene expected to be involved in stamen and carpel formation, and two putative SEP genes which act in concert with the A-, B- and C-type MADS box gene in determining flower whorl formation. The B-type gene EgMADS16 was functionally characterized as a PISTILLATA orthologue; it was able to complement an Arabidopsis thaliana pi mutant. Whether EgMADS16, or any of the other EgMADS genes, are functionally involved in the mantled condition remains to be established.     

Large scale interaction analysis predicts that the <Emphasis Type="Italic">Gerbera hybrida</Emphasis> floral E function is provided both by general and specialized proteins

Background  

The ornamental plant Gerbera hybrida bears complex inflorescences with morphologically distinct floral morphs that are specific to the sunflower family Asteraceae. We have previously characterized several MADS box genes that regulate floral development in Gerbera. To study further their behavior in higher order complex formation according to the quartet model, we performed yeast two- and three-hybrid analysis with fourteen Gerbera MADS domain proteins to analyze their protein-protein interaction potential.     

CURVED CHIMERIC PALEA 1 encoding an EMF1‐like protein maintains epigenetic repression of OsMADS58 in rice palea development

Floral organ specification is controlled by various MADS‐box genes in both dicots and monocots, whose expression is often subjected to both genetic and epigenetic regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. However, little information is known about the role of epigenetic modification of MADS‐box genes during rice flower development. Here, we report the characterization of a rice gene, CURVED CHIMERIC PALEA 1 (CCP1) that functions in palea development. Mutation in CCP1 resulted in abnormal palea with ectopic stigmatic tissues and other pleiotropic phenotypes. We found that OsMADS58, a C‐class gene responsible for carpel morphogenesis, was ectopically expressed in the ccp1 palea, indicating that the ccp1 palea was misspecified and partially acquired carpel‐like identity. Constitutive expression of OsMADS58 in the wild‐type rice plants caused morphological abnormality of palea similar to that of ccp1, whereas OsMADS58 knockdown by RNAi in ccp1 could rescue the abnormal phenotype of mutant palea, suggesting that the repression of OsMADS58 expression by CCP1 is critical for palea development. Map‐based cloning revealed that CCP1 encodes a putative plant‐specific EMBRYONIC FLOWER1 (EMF1)‐like protein. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay showed that the level of the H3K27me3 at the OsMADS58 locus was greatly reduced in ccp1 compared with that in the wild‐type. Taken together, our results show that CCP1 plays an important role in palea development through maintaining H3K27me3‐mediated epigenetic silence of the carpel identity‐specifying gene OsMADS58, shedding light on the epigenetic mechanism in floral organ development.     

The MADS box gene AOM1 is expressed in reproductive meristems and flowers of the dioecious species Asparagus officinalis

MADS box genes are implicated in different steps of plant development. Some of them are expressed in vegetative organs. Most of them, however, are expressed in flower tissues and are involved in different phases of flower development. Here we describe the isolation and characterization of an Asparagus officinalis MADS box gene, AOM1. The deduced AOM1 protein shows the highest degree of similarity with FBP2 of Petunia hybrida and AGL9 (SEP3), AGL2 (SEP1) and AGL4 (SEP2) of Arabidopsis thaliana. In situ hybridization analyses, however, show that the expression profile of AOM1 is different from that of these genes: AOM1 is expressed not only in flower organs but also in inflorescence and flower meristems. These data indicate a possible function of AOM1 during flower development as well as in earlier stages of the flowering process. Asparagus officinalis is a dioecious species which bears male and female flowers on different individuals. AOM1, which is expressed very early during the process of flowering and has a similar expression profile in male and female flowers, does not seems to be involved in asparagus sex differentiation. Received: 3 July 2000 / Revision accepted: 4 August 2000