Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of thin-layer cytology with Autocyte PREP (TriPath Imaging Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) with conventional smears in 500 women undergoing cervical cone biopsy. STUDY DESIGN: The study was performed among 500 consecutive women presenting for cone biopsy for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on biopsy in 350 (70%) and discrepant cytology/colpohistology in 150 (30%). Before performing a cone biopsy, two cervical samples were collected for conventional smears and thin-layer cytologic slides, with randomization of the order. Conventional smears were stained and diagnosed at Pasteur Cerba, while thin-layer cytologic slides were processed at a local TriPath office (Meylan, France) and sent in a masked fashion for screening at Pasteur Cerba. Any slides initially read as normal were reviewed again and reported without knowledge of the other cytologic or cone biopsy data. The final cytologic diagnoses for the two methods were compared with histopathology of the cone biopsy. RESULTS: The conventional smear was unsatisfactory in 58 (11.6%) of cases, while there were 4 (0.8%) unsatisfactory thin-layer cytologic slides (P < .001). Endocervical cells were missing from 31 (6.2%) of conventional smears and 34 (6.8%) of thin-layer cytologic slides. For the pooled data, sensitivities of conventional smear and thin layer for detecting high grade CIN (0.82% and 0.86%, respectively) were similar as were specificities (0.40% and 0.43%, respectively). When first samples were compared, the sensitivities of the conventional smear and thin layer for high grade CIN were 0.79% and 0.89%, respectively (P = .02), with corresponding specificities of 0.41% and 0.36% (P < .01). CONCLUSION: When controlled for sample order, the sensitivity of thin-layer cytology for detecting high grade CIN was significantly higher than that of conventional smears in patients with previous abnormal cytology, but at the expense of specificity.     

Expert consultation for cervical carcinoma smears. Reliability of selected-field videomicroscopy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of videomicroscopy image selection for expert consultation in cervical cytology. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred diagnostically difficult cervical cytologic smears were selected and rescreened by a general pathologist who chose, from each slide, four or five fields featuring abnormal cells. Video images were digitized and stored on a 512 x 512-pixel matrix using an image acquisition and transmission system. Five experts each reviewed 20 of the 100 cases, and a sixth reviewed all 100 cases. Diagnoses based on selected digitized images were compared to those based on conventional examination of whole slides. RESULTS: Intraobserver agreement was fair to excellent for all six experts (kappa value: 0.47-0.81); it was complete or acceptable in 68.4-85% of cases. Compared to the reference diagnosis, interobserver agreement was not significantly different whether cases were examined by screening the entire slide or by videomicroscopy of selected fields. The marked discordance in four cases concerned very small cells the significance of which was misinterpreted on videomicroscopy because of poor image quality due to lack of focus setting. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study showed that selection of videomicroscopy images seems as reliable as conventional examination of slides for expert consultation on diagnostically difficult cervical cytologic smear cases.     

Cervical cytology quality assurance in Washington State.

The objectives of this study were to establish a profile of cervical cytology laboratories in Washington State, identify quality assurance problems amenable to correction through education or legislation, and describe differences between large and small cytology laboratories. All 43 Washington laboratories that perform cervical cytology were surveyed by mail during 1989. Completed surveys were returned by 37 (86%) of the laboratories. Nearly half (43%) of the respondents reported processing less than 10,000 Papanicolaou smears annually. Only one-third (35%) of the respondents reported participating in relevant proficiency programs. A proportion of smaller cytology laboratories were compensating their cytotechnologists on the basis of the number of slides read and allowing Papanicolaou smears to be read outside the confines of the laboratory. The results of this study suggest that cytotechnologists in some larger Washington laboratories have been exceeding work load limits recommended by professional associations. Recent legislation includes regulations that address cervical cytology quality assurance. However, continued efforts will need to be made to encourage voluntary adoption of quality control measures not addressed by this legislation.     

Rapid pre-screening is more sensitive in liquid-based cytology than in conventional smears

Rapid pre-screening (RPS) is a useful tool to measure and improve performance in the cytology laboratory. Whether RPS is more or less effective in liquid-based cytology than in conventional smears is unknown. We compared the estimated sensitivity in a laboratory of 11 cytotechnologists which converted from conventional smears to SurePath? (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, N.J., USA) liquid based cytology. In the 9 months prior to conversion, 23,286 smears were screened compared with 30,610 smears in the 12 months immediately after conversion. The estimated sensitivity of rapid pre-screening for 90 s improved significantly with liquid based cytology for all abnormalities (58.7 vs. 68.7%, p<0.001), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance+low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesion (52.6 vs. 63.1%, p<0.001), and high-grade squamous intra-epithelial alone (76.2 vs. 85%, p<0.001). Histologic follow up for 156 cases identified by rapid pre-screening of SurePath slides showed 32 (21%) cases of CIN1 or greater and 18 cases (12%) with CIN3 or worse. We conclude that rapid pre-screening is significantly more sensitive in liquid-based cytology compared with conventional smears, and detects significant lesions that are missed by routine screening.     

Estimating the sensitivity of cervical cytology: errors of interpretation and test limitations

The objective of this study was to estimate: (i) the sensitivity of cytologists in recognizing abnormal smears; (ii) the sensitivity of cervical cytology as a method of detecting abnormal smears among those obtained in the presence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Study subjects were 61 women with a histologically confirmed CIN identified through colpohistological and cytologic screening. For objective (i) new smears were taken from study subjects just before treatment, mixed with routine preparations, interpreted by unaware cytologists and then blindly reviewed by a group of three expert supervisors, who reached a consensus diagnosis. Cytologists classified as positive for squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) 30 of the 34 smears judged as positive by supervisors (100% of smears classified as high-grade and 67% of smears classified as low-grade SIL by the supervisors). Our approach, based on creating a set of smears with a high a priori probability of being positive, proved to be an efficient way of estimating errors of interpretation. For objective (ii), smears taken at the moment of diagnosis, just before biopsy, were also reviewed by the same supervisors. These CIN cases were identified among asymptomatic women independently of cytological findings and results are therefore not subject to verification bias. Among the 33 histological CINII/III, four (12%) smears had no atypical cells (three negatives and one unsatisfactory) at review. The same proportion was 26% (four negatives and one unsatisfactory) among the 19 histological CINI. No significant differences in smear content were found between the seven ‘false negatives’ and a sample of ‘true positives’ and ‘true negatives’ for a number of formal adequacy criteria (including presence of endocervical cells). Strong differences were found between positive smears taken just before biopsy and those taken just before treatment (in 11 women the first smear only was positive, while the opposite was never observed), suggesting an effect of punch biopsy in removing lesions.     

The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia

Objective:  To determine the role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in the management of endocervical neoplasia.
Setting:  Colposcopy unit and cytology laboratory in a teaching hospital.
Sample:  Group 1 included 184 smears showing endocervical glandular neoplasia from 129 patients and group 2 included 101 patients with histology showing endocervical abnormalities in a 6-year period (1993–1998). Follow-up of 6–11 years to 2004 was available.
Methods:  Group 1 were identified from the cytology computer records. Group 2 were identified from histology records on the cytology database and a record of histology cases kept for audit purposes. The clinical records were examined retrospectively.
Results:  The positive predictive value (PPV) of abnormal endocervical cells in smears was 81.1% for significant glandular/squamous [cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN)/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade2 (CIN2 or worse)] lesions. The PPV of colposcopy was 93.5% for significant glandular/squamous lesions of the cervix. The postcolposcopy probability of a significant lesion when colposcopy was normal was 87.5%. The sensitivity of colposcopy in detecting endocervical lesions was 9.8%. The sensitivity of cervical smears in detecting a significant endocervical abnormality (CGIN or worse) was 66.3%. The false negative rate for cytology of endocervical glandular lesions was 4.0%.
Conclusions:  Endocervical glandular neoplasia detected on cytology is predictive of significant cervical pathology even when colposcopy is normal, which supports excisional biopsy in the primary assessment of these smears. The high concomitant squamous abnormality rate justifies the use of colposcopy to direct biopsies from the ectocervix. Cervical cytology is the only current screening method for cervical glandular abnormalities but sensitivity is poor.     

Comparison of two preparation methods for endocervical evaluation

OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of SurePath liquid-based preparation method for examination of endocervical brush specimens as a substitute for conventionally prepared cytology methods for evaluating the endocervical canal during colposcopic examination and biopsy. STUDY DESIGN: Paired SurePath liquid-based test slides and conventional smears were obtained using an endocervical brush in a split sample protocol before biopsy at the time of colposcopy. The level of agreement between cytologic results obtained was assessed. Accuracy and operating characteristics were evaluated compared to histologic follow-up. RESULTS: Agreement between cytology results for the methods was excellent. The overall kappa was 0.924 (p = 0.0000). There was exact agreement on interpretation between the methods in 283 of 299 cases (94.6%). Cytohistologic follow-up results correlation were: SurePath liquid-based Pap test results and conventional smear results agreed with histology results in 47.8% and 49.2% of cases, respectively. Allowing for a discrepancy within 1 level of severity of cytologic grade, agreements were 76.6% and 77.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the SurePath method is equivalent to conventional endocervical brush cytology preparation and performs well for detection of cervical intraepithelial lesions and cancer. SurePath is acceptable for endocervical evaluation as a substitute for endocervical curettage at colposcopic biopsy.     

Rapid cervicovaginal smear screening: method of quality control and assessing individual cytotechnologist performance

AIM: To validate the method of rapid screening (RS) in the detection of cervical lesions and false-negative results as well as in quality control of cytotechnologist performance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The RS method was validated on Papanicolaou-stained and initially conventionally analysed vaginal, cervical and endocervical (VCE) smears collected in an opportunistic programme for the detection of cervical carcinoma. The study included 3680 VCE smears from the Department of Gynaecologic Cytology, University Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zagreb and from the Department of Clinical Cytology, Osijek University Hospital, Osijek. Histologically verified abnormal findings accounted for 10% of the study samples. Thirteen cytotechnologists, with no previous experience in RS, performed the test. Each slide was examined using the 'step' technique for 1.5 minutes, the findings were classified as negative or abnormal, and the abnormal ones were also classified according to differential cytological diagnosis. The results were compared with those obtained on initial screening. Abnormal findings from a group of initially negative findings were reanalysed using conventional methods to make definitive cytological diagnosis. RESULTS: RS yielded a sensitivity of 83.7%, specificity of 93.7%, positive predictive value of 62.4%, negative predictive value of 97.9% and diagnostic accuracy of 92.6%. Relative to the initial abnormal differential cytological diagnosis, the diagnostic value of RS increased with lesion severity [54.8%, 68.0% and 91.3% for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) I, CIN II and CIN III respectively]. RS detected 38 additional positive findings; 94.2% of these were atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS)/abnormal glandular cells undetermined significance (AGUS) and CIN I. The rate of additional positive findings was 1.14% (38/3135). The false-negative rate of initial screening was 9.4% (38/406), and individual cytotechnologist sensitivity was 60.0-100.0%. CONCLUSION: RS could be introduced as an efficient method of quality control to improve the sensitivity of cytological screening as well as for quality control of cytotechnologist performance.     

Review of cytologic slides from the national women's hospital, New Zealand, cohort of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 diagnosed in 1955-1976

OBJECTIVE: To review cytologic slides, mostly at least 25 years old, from women attending National Women's Hospital, Auckland, who had been diagnosed histologically with cervical carcinoma in situ in 1955-1976. STUDY DESIGN: Smears comprised all those from the 2 years following diagnosis as well as all subsequent smears for women who developed "microinvasive" or invasive lower genital tract cancer. The Victorian Cytology Service performed the review using the Australian Modified Bethesda System. was 0.97. RESULTS: Nine percent of 4,930 retrieved slides were technically unsatisfactory. Original (Papanicolaou) and review coding were available for 4,477 slides. Using categories of equivalence, smears coded as normal (original, 59.2%; review, 61.4%) or showing possible or definite high grade abnormalities (original, 25.9%; review, 29.6%) were found in similar proportions. The kappa statistic (0.79) indicated a high level of agreement between original and review coding. In comparison with the review, the sensitivity of the original coding in detecting high grade abnormalities was 0.80, while the ability of the original assessment to categorize smears as not high grade (specificity) CONCLUSION: This comprehensive review found nearly all archived cytology slides to be technically satisfactory and the broad diagnostic cytologic categories from earlier periods (apart from benign lesions) to be concordant with those currently used.     

Interpreting microbiopsies in cervical smears. A cytohistologic approach

OBJECTIVE: To assess interobserver variation in the diagnosis of thick tissue specimens (microbiopsies) in cytology smears and histologic sections taken from them, to evaluate the applicability of MIB-1 in histologic sections from microbiopsies and to evaluate whether processing microbiopsies in inconclusive smears has additional diagnostic value. STUDY DESIGN: Cytologic smears were selected in which there were diagnostic disagreements between pathologists and cytologists and microbiopsies were present. Interobserver variation among three pathologists and three cytologists in the diagnosis of these microbiopsies was investigated. The smears were processed for histologic sections, and interobserver variation between pathologist diagnoses were analyzed. An additional histologic slide stained for MIB-1 was used for consensus diagnosis. The consensus diagnosis was compared with available follow-up and its sensitivity and specificity determined. The value of applying the microbiopsy technique in slides diagnosed as inadequate or atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) was analysed. RESULTS: From a series of 62,334 cervical smears, 49 with microbiopsies were selected. It was possible to derive histologic slides from 38 cases. Interobserver variability in the diagnosis of microbiopsies and histologic sections from them was moderate--kappa = .44 (SE = .06) and kappa = .44 (SE = .09), respectively. In the consensus meeting for all cases, a conclusive diagnosis was reached. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the consensus diagnosis and MIB-1 staining was r = .62. The sensitivity of the consensus diagnosis for the follow-up diagnosis was 71% and the specificity 60%. Diagnosis on approximately 50% of slides diagnosed as inadequate or ASCUS could be made. CONCLUSION: The histotechnical workup of microbiopsies is not difficult; however, their diagnosis can be a problem. Adequate diagnostic criteria are not available. Aided by MIB-1 staining, histologic sections from microbiopsies can be diagnosed, and the diagnoses correlated with follow-up in most cases. Processing of microbiopsies in smears with an inconclusive cytologic diagnosis or a diagnosis of ASCUS allowed correct diagnosis in 50% of cases in this study.     

Exfoliative cytology in the evaluation of interferon treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Local interferon injection in four patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) regularly elicited progressive regression of the lesions. The response was observed with exfoliative cytology after each injection, guided by colposcopic examination. The cytologic changes showed a cytocidal effect mainly on the dyskaryotic cells, preceded by cellular degeneration not unlike that of nonspecific inflammation and accompanied by an increase in neutrophil infiltration. The cytologic response was closely correlated with partial or complete clinical regression based on the absence of viable or degenerated dyskaryotic cells in the cervical smears. Three patients showed complete clinical regression after treatment. One patient showed recurrent viable dyskaryotic cells when the dosage was reduced, and treatment was suspended temporarily although her lesion had regressed completely after five injections. Clinical recurrence was noted one week after viable dyskaryotic cells reappeared in her smears. These observations suggest that cytology may be a useful means of monitoring interferon treatment in CIN.     

The cytology of vaginal, cervical and endometrial smears obtained at the time of embryo transfer during in vitro fertilization

Seventy-four women enrolled in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) program had cytologic smears of the vagina, cervix and endometrium obtained at the time of embryo transfer (ET). Of these, 68 vaginal, 46 cervical and 25 endometrial smears were available for cytologic examination. Of the 68 vaginal smears, 4% showed a proliferative pattern, 40% were early secretory and 56% were advanced secretory. The 46 cervical smears demonstrated a delayed hormonal effect, with 70% showing a proliferative pattern, 23% early secretory and 7% advanced secretory cytology. Endometrial cells were obtained only when the Jones catheter, which has a side opening, was used. Twenty-two patients had both vaginal smears and suitable endometrial smears. Of these, 8 of the 9 patients with early secretory vaginal cytology had secretory endometrium while 10 of the 12 patients with mid-secretory vaginal cytology had secretory endometrium. The value of endometrial cytology in predicting conception following IVF-ET is unknown. It seems, however, that a good correlation exists between endometrial and vaginal cytology and that the latter may be of value as an additional, noninvasive tool for the evaluation of endometrial development.     

Cervicovaginal cytology in uterine adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma. Comparison of cytologic and histologic findings

To investigate the diagnostic accuracy and to characterize the findings in false-negative cases, the results of cervicovaginal cytology in 56 adenocarcinomas and 25 adenosquamous carcinomas (42 cervical, 36 endometrial, 2 metastatic and 1 arising synchronously from both cervix and endometrium) were reviewed, including review of the actual slides in 56 cases. Overall, 80% of the initial cytologic diagnoses resulted in diagnostic curettage (i.e., cytology was effectively positive); 84% of the postreview diagnosis were effectively positive. Nine cytology slides showed no malignant cells; eight of these negative smears showed repair, five were atrophic, two showed a high estrogen effect and one had enlarged atypical bare nuclei. These false-negative diagnoses were associated with an endometrial primary site (P less than .01), endometrioid histology (P less than .005), low-grade or intermediate-grade histology (P less than .005), small size of tumor (P less than .05) and absence of cervical involvement (P less than .005) in those cases in which a hysterectomy was performed. False-negative diagnoses were not associated with an absence of endocervical cells or with scanty cellularity. Of 39 cervical and 28 endometrial carcinomas with a positive cytologic diagnosis (initially or after review of the available slides), cytology correctly identified the primary site in 18% and 54% of the cases, respectively. Cytology incorrectly classified the anatomic site of four cervical and three endometrial carcinomas and considered one case arising in both the endometrium and cervix to be endometrial. Routine cervicovaginal cytology does have a role in screening for uterine glandular carcinoma; to maximize its diagnostic sensitivity, we suggest using a recommendation for curettage in the report of positive cases so that all of the varied cytologic diagnoses associated with glandular carcinomas will receive a uniform clinical response. In those cases with preserved cancer cells, a correlation can be made with the histologic type of the carcinoma, rather than with the anatomic site.     

Numerical chromosomal aberrations of chromosome 1 and 7 in dysplastic cervical smears

Cervical smears with Papanicolaou's staining (PAP) reveal only morphological characteristics of epithelial cells of the cervix uteri. Since chromosomal aberrations are known to play a role in malignant transition, we analyzed cervical smears for numerical changes of the chromosomes 1 and 7 with fluorescence in-situ hybridization to probe for a diagnostic value of these chromosomes in the characterization of cervical dysplasia. Cervical smears were collected from 21 patients with suspect histology of curettage or biopsy specimen, 14 of them having been subsequently graded as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III and 5 as CIN II. Nineteen normal cervical smears (PAP I-II) served as controls. Smears were hybridized with chromosomal enumeration probes for chromosome 1 and 7. Disomic cells (2 copies of chromosome 1 and 7) were decreased in the CIN II (63%) and CIN III group (57%) with respect to the control group (77%). Cells with 3 signals for chromosome 7 were significantly more frequent in the CIN III and the CIN II group than in the control group (6.7, 6.4 and 0.7%, respectively). Only the CIN II group (10%), but not CIN II (6%), showed a significant trisomy for chromosome 1 as compared with the controls (3.8%). A close correlation between the incidence of trisomy 1 or 7 and PAP grading was observed. PAP III-IIID smears with high trisomy 1 counts corresponded to CIN III histology, while all CIN II patients were PAP III-IIID with low incidence of trisomy 1. We conclude that trisomy of chromosome 7 is a feature of cervical dysplasia and seems to be an early event in dysplastic transition. In contrast, trisomy of chromosome 1 is observed only in high grade dysplasia and may be a marker for pre-malignant lesions.     

Quality control measures for cervical cytology laboratories

The results of three quality control measures for evaluating a cytopathology laboratory's performance in the diagnosis of cervical abnormalities are presented. The sensitivities of cervical cytology were estimated to be 95.5% or 93.1% (using two different methods of analysis) for the detection of histologically diagnosed invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix and 60% for the detection of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix in 1983. The positive predictive values for a histologic diagnosis of neoplasia after cytologic reports of CIN III and invasive carcinoma were 92.5% and 99%, respectively. Repeatability of a negative cytologic result exceeded 98%. These results indicate that accurate cervical cytologic reporting can be achieved. Regular monitoring of the type described, which is both practical and reasonably comprehensive, is recommended for all laboratories.     

Human papillomavirus DNA and liquid-based cervical cytology cotesting in screening and follow-up patient groups

OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA and cervical cytology cotesting in screening and follow-up of patients with previous cervical abnormalities and to assess the significance of a positive HPV DNA test result in re-screening of cytologically normal cases. STUDY DESIGN: Cellular samples collected in liquid-based fixative were used for both cervical cytology and HPV DNA testing. The cervical cytology slides were manually screened by cytotechnologists followed by rapid re-screening by pathologists. The HPV DNA tests were performed using hybrid capture test kits. Statistical analyses of cervical cytology results and HPV DNA tests for high- and low-risk HPV from both patient groups were carried out. RESULTS: The prevalence of HPV DNA-positive cases was higher in younger patients. There was a poor correlation between cervical cytology results and HPV DNA tests for the screening group (kappa = 0.23), but a fair to good correlation was obtained for the follow-up group (kappa = 0.51). The false negative fraction of cytology negative/HPV DNA positive cases (0.1317), as compared with cytology negative/HPV DNA negative cases (0.0056), was statistically significant (p = 0.000001). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of HPV DNA decreased with increasing age in both the screening and follow-up patient groups. Virus clearance was delayed in the follow-up group as compared with the screening group. There was a poor correlation between cervical cytology and HPV DNA tests in the screening group but a fair to good correlation in the follow-up patient group. Cotesting of HPV DNA and cervical cytology increases the sensitivity and decreases the false negative fraction, suggesting that cotesting could be used to increase the interval of screening.     

Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Cytologic predictive value for glandular involvement in high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions

OBJECTIVE: To verify the cytologic predictive value of a diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) in high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) cases. STUDY DESIGN: In a retrospective study, 98 cases of HSIL were reviewed. All patients were referred for colposcopy and directed biopsy to confirm the cytologic diagnoses. Loop excision of the transformation zone was performed to treat clinical lesions. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were evaluated. Kappa statistics and logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the findings statistically. RESULTS: By logistic regression analysis, we found that the chance of finding squamous intraepithelial lesions involving glands in AGUS smears was 5.32 times higher than in those with no AGUS. It was 5.74 times higher in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 lesions than in CIN 2. CONCLUSION: The cytologic predictive value for HSIL involving glands is statistically significant when specific and objective criteria are used for the AGUS diagnosis.     

An overview of the College of American Pathologists' programs in surgical pathology and cytopathology. Data summary of diagnostic performance in cervical cytopathology

The survey programs in surgical pathology and cytopathology of the College of American Pathologists are described, along with a summary of the data produced on diagnostic performance in cytopathology. The levels of agreement between individual diagnoses and consensus diagnoses were highest for slides in the "negative" and "positive" categories and somewhat less for slides in the "suspicious" categories. Submission of slides with 70% or less agreement and slides on which a consensus had not been reached to a new group of observers yielded similar levels of agreement, indicating that there is a fairly small percentage of cervical smears that are diagnostic problems. Agreement levels, especially in relation to false negatives and false positives, represent a commendable achievement, especially considering that cervical cytology is a screening procedure and that "suspicious" smears result in further investigations. It is also important to recognize that additional clinical data and studies are often taken into consideration before definitive treatment is begun or additional follow-up smears are taken.     

Cytologically detected chlamydial changes and progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias. A retrospective case-control study

Fifty-four patients with Chlamydia-associated changes on the cervical smears, in whom adequate follow-up had been obtained over a two-year period, were investigated. The progression to biopsy-proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III in this group was 42.6%, significantly higher than the 15.8% progression rate noted in a control group of patients with similar cytologic abnormalities but unassociated with Chlamydia. This finding suggests that Chlamydia may be a cocarcinogen or a potentiating agent in the progression of CIN.     

Inflammatory atypia. An apparent link with subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia explained by cytologic underreading

A review of 5,752 cervical smears done on college students at a medium-sized midwestern university in a 24-month period showed 496 cytologic diagnoses of inflammatory atypia and 132 of dysplasia (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: CIN). Further retrospective review of a nonselected cohort (178 cases) of the 496 patients with inflammatory atypia showed that their subsequent cytologic smears were more likely to show CIN than could be explained by chance alone. Only ten cases accounted for this difference, and a case-controlled blind review of the original cytologic smears of these ten patients resulted in the reclassification to CIN (mild dysplasia) of seven who had subsequently "progressed" from inflammatory atypia to dysplasia. Only one control smear was reclassified. In this population, underreading of a small number of cervical smears explained a strong statistical apparent correlation between inflammatory atypia and the subsequent development of CIN.