Molecular analysis of deletion (17)(p11.2p11.2) in a family segregating a 17p paracentric inversion: implications for carriers of paracentric inversions.

A male child with multiple congenital anomalies initially was clinically diagnosed as having Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS). Subsequent cytogenetic studies revealed an interstitial deletion of 17p11.2, which is associated with Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS). Biochemical studies were not supportive of a diagnosis of SLOS, and the child did not display the typical SMS phenotype. The father's karyotype showed a paracentric inversion of 17p, with breakpoints in p11.2 and p13.3, and the same inversion was also found in two of the father's sisters. FISH analyses of the deleted and inverted 17p chromosomes indicated that the deletion was similar to that typically seen in SMS patients and was found to bracket the proximal inversion breakpoint. Available family members were genotyped at 33 polymorphic DNA loci in 17p. These studies determined that the deletion was of paternal origin and that the inversion was of grandpaternal origin. Haplotype analysis demonstrated that the 17p11.2 deletion arose following a recombination event involving the father's normal and inverted chromosome 17 homologues. A mechanism is proposed to explain the simultaneous deletion and apparent "reinversion" of the recombinant paternal chromosome. These findings have implications for prenatal counseling of carriers of paracentric inversions, who typically are considered to bear minimal reproductive risk.     

Paracentric inversions: a review

This review of paracentric inversions in man includes what we know of the behaviour and reproductive consequences of paracentric inversions from other species. Observations of naturally occurring inversions in several species of plants and animals and results of experiments with mutagenically induced inversions in the mouse are discussed. From a review of 184 cases, it is concluded that most of the paracentric inversions in man are harmless and that the risk of heterozygotes having a child with an unbalanced karyotype is low. However, in some cases, it is difficult, if not impossible, to distinguish between a paracentric inversion and a paracentric insertion, the risk in the latter case being about 15%. Caution is also necessary in interpreting the results of prenatal diagnosis for heterozygotes of paracentric inversions, because of the possibility of a variety of unpredictable unbalanced chromosome products.     

Familial pericentric and paracentric inversions of chromosome 1

Summary We investigated 33 individuals (21 carriers) from one family with a pericentric inversion involving a large part of chromosome 1 (1p36.11q32). In addition, we investigated 15 individuals (10 carriers) from another family with a paracentric inversion of a small part of chromosome 1(1p321p36.1). In each family, the index patient was ascertained because three miscarriages had occurred. Each carrier of these inversions was phenotypically normal. If the miscarriages of the index patients are excluded, the frequency of recognized miscarriages among the carriers of childbearing age was 9% (4 of 46) for the family with pericentric inversion and 17% (4 of 23) for the family with paracentric inversion. One of the pericentric inv(1) carriers had had a stillborn daughter. The carriers of the pericentric inversion who were of childbearing age had 41 children; carriers of the paracentric inversion who were of childbearing age had 19 children. No live-born children with birth defects were observed in either family. This evidence, together with the low frequency of miscarriages, suggests that crossover within the inversion loop occurs much less frequently than might be expected from the large size of this inversion. Our investigation suggests that the risk of recognized miscarriages, stillbirths, and live-born children with recombinant chromosomes who have birth defects may be much lower for inv(1) carriers than previously reported. The risk of having a malformed child because of a recombinant chromosome is probably less than 3% for carriers of the pericentric inversion and less than 6% for the carriers of the paracentric inversion.     

A fetus with recombinant of chromosome 8 inherited from her carrier father

Summary A pericentric inversion of chromosome 8, inv(8)(p23q22), in a male carrier resulted in an unbalanced recombinant, rec(8)dup q, inv(8)(p23q22), which was diagnosed prenatally. The features seen in the aborted fetus resembled the features seen in a previously affected child who received the identical recombinant from her carrier mother. In this particular inversion involving chromosome 8, both male and female carriers risk producing an unbalanced progeny. Different familial pericentric inversions are reviewed for the presence or absence of unbalanced recombinants.     

Reproductive outcomes of paracentric inversion carriers: Report of a liveborn dicentric recombinant and literature review

Summary An abnormal infant had a dicentric chromosome 14 with an inverted tandem duplication [46,XY,inv dup(14) (pterq32.3::q24.2pter)], thus making him trisomic for the proximal two-thirds of chromosome 14. This abnormality was derived from a maternal paracentric inversion in chromosome 14 [46,XX,inv(14)(q24.2q32.3)]. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a liveborn infant carrying a stable, dicentric product of crossing over within a paracentric inversion loop. A review of the reproductive outcomes of paracentric inversion carriers in the literature suggests that they are at some risk for pregnancy wastage. The risk for liveborn recombinants is small but such births have occurred, at least to female carriers.     

A familial deletion 4q syndrome: An outcome of a paracentric inversion

Chromosome inversions are intra-chromosomal rearrangements formed when the chromosome breaks occur at two places, and in the process of repair the intervening segments are joined in an inverted or opposite manner. Inversions themselves do not appear to cause clinical anomalies, if balanced. Abnormal phenotypes can occur due to gene disruption at the point of breakage and reunion or due to duplication/deficiency recombinants formed during crossover at meiosis. We report a case with familial deletion 4q syndrome in a 1-year-old female child with dysmorphism and congenital abnormalities. The deletion was an outcome of a paracentric inversion 4q31.2q35.2. The deletion was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization using telomeric DNA probes for chromosome No. 4. An attempt was made to correlate the genotype with the phenotype. The father had the same rearrangement with a milder phenotype. The recurrence risk in such cases is high.     

Paracentric inversion in the short arm of chromosome 1. Report of a family and review of the literature

In general, carriers of paracentric inversions are phenotypically normal, although individual reports describe like occurrence of infertility, miscarriages and mental retardation in inversion carriers. We present a family with paracentric inversion of 1p [karyotype: 46,XY/XY, inv(1)(p13.2p36.2)] in 7 of the 12 investigated family members. The index patient, a four year-old boy was referred for motor and mental retardation. The possible relationship between the paracentric inversion and the MR/MCA syndrome in the index patient of this family is briefly discussed.     

The association of a lymphoreticular malignancy with an 11q deletion: A coincidence or a cancer susceptibility?

A balanced paternal chromosome insertion, ins(11) p14q14q21, resulted in a female with an unbalanced karyotype, del(11)(q14q21). This imbalance presumably arose from a meiotic crossover between the breakpoint of the insertion and the breakpoints of the deletion. This child developed a malignant lymphoma of the thymus in the first year of life. The association of a lymphoma with an 11q deletion may not be a coincidence in view of the frequent involvement of 11q in cytogenetic alterations of lymphomas.     

Cytogenetic analysis of sperm from a man heterozygous for a pericentric inversion, inv (3) (p25q21).

Human sperm chromosomes were studied in a man heterozygous for a pericentric inversion of chromosome 3(p25q21). The pronuclear chromosomes were analyzed after in vitro penetration of golden hamster eggs. A total of 144 sperm were examined: 69.2% were chromosomally balanced and 30.8% were recombinant. Of the balanced complements, the proportion with a normal chromosome 3 (37.6%) was approximately equal to the proportion with an inverted 3 (31.6%). Of the recombinant complements, the proportion of sperm with a duplication q/deletion p (17.3%) was approximately equal to the reciprocal event of duplication p/deletion q (13.5%). The recombinant chromosome 3 with a duplication q and deletion p has been observed in several abnormal children, but the duplication p/deletion q has never been reported. My results demonstrate that both recombinant chromosomes are produced as expected from an unequal number of crossovers within an inversion loop. In all likelihood the duplication p/deletion q chromosome is an early embryonic lethal because of the amount of genetic material deleted. The proportions of X-bearing (48.9%) and Y-bearing sperm (51.1%) were not significantly different from the expected 1:1 ratio. There was no evidence for an interchromosomal effect. Of the three inversions studied by human sperm chromosome analysis, recombinant chromosomes have been observed only in this case.     

Familial paracentric inversions inv(2)(q31q35) and inv(8)(q22.3q24.13) ascertained through reproductive abnormalities

Summary Two cases of familial paracentric inversion, one in the long arm of chromosome 2 and the other in the long arm of chromosome 8, are described. The first was ascertained in a woman who was studied because of recurrent abortions. The second was ascertained in the father of a girl with the trichorhinophalangeal syndrome and an interstitial deletion in 8q. The latter is the first case in which unequal crossing over in an inversion loop can be inferred in a male carrier of a paracentric inversion. The reasons for the relatively low frequency of paracentric inversions observed and factors which affect the pregnancy outcome are discussed.     

Parental Imbalances Involving Chromosomes 15q and 22q May Predispose to the Formation of De Novo Pathogenic Microdeletions and Microduplications in the Offspring

Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) led to the discovery of genetic abnormalities among patients with complex phenotype and normal karyotype. Also several apparently normal individuals have been found to be carriers of cryptic imbalances, hence the importance to perform parental investigations after the identification of a deletion/duplication in a proband. Here, we report the molecular cytogenetic characterization of two individuals in which the microdeletions/duplications present in their parents could have predisposed and facilitated the formation of de novo pathogenic different copy number variations (CNVs). In family 1, a 4-year-old girl had a de novo pathogenic 10.5 Mb duplication at 15q21.2q22.2, while her mother showed a 2.262 Mb deletion at 15q13.2q13.3; in family 2, a 9-year-old boy had a de novo 1.417 Mb deletion at 22q11.21 and a second paternal deletion of 247 Kb at 22q11.23 on the same chromosome 22. Chromosome 22 at band q11.2 and chromosome 15 at band q11q13 are considered unstable regions. We could hypothesize that 15q13.2q13.3 and 22q11.21 deletions in the two respective parents might have increased the risk of rearrangements in their children. This study highlights the difficulty to make genetic counseling and predict the phenotypic consequences in these situations.     

Array CGH characterization of an unbalanced X-autosome translocation associated with Xq27.2–qter deletion, 11q24.3–qter duplication and Xq22.3–q27.1 duplication in a girl with primary amenorrhea and mental retardation

We present array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) characterization of an unbalanced X-autosome translocation with an Xq interstitial segmental duplication in a 16-year-old girl with primary ovarian failure, mental retardation, attention deficit disorder, learning difficulty and facial dysmorphism. aCGH analysis revealed an Xq27.2–q28 deletion, an 11q24.3–q25 duplication, and an inverted duplication of Xq22.3–q27.1. The karyotype was 46,X,der(X)t(X;11)(q27.2;q24.3) dup(X)(q27.1q22.3). We discuss the genotype–phenotype correlation in this case. Our case provides evidence for an association of primary amenorrhea and mental retardation with concomitant unbalanced X-autosome translocation and X chromosome rearrangement.     

Genetic counseling in cases of chromosome insertions]

The principles of the estimation of the risk of repeated birth of malformed child and spontaneous abortion in families of balanced carriers of insertions are presented. A risk for a carrier is formed from two parts: a risk for a carrier of reciprocal translocation and a risk for a carrier of insertion of the came length as inseried segment. The first component of the risk is a constant, the latter one is a variable. It depends on the length of the inserted segment, the type of its inclusion (direct or inverted) and sites of break points. An estimation of the risk in hypothetical insertion 46, XX, inv ins (4; 2) (q24; q22q34) is described as a model. The same method of counselling may be used for the families with triple translocations t(a-, b-, c+) with "insertion" of fragment of chromosome "a" between the parts of "b" and "c" chromosomes. A tentative empirical mean value of repeated birth of malformed child and spontaneous abortion in families with insertions is 29% and 45% for the female carrier, and about 37% and 25% for the male carrier.     

Inv21p12q22del21q22 and intellectual disability

Chromosomal rearrangements are common in humans. Pericentric inversions are among the most frequent aberrations (1–2%). Most inversions are balanced and do not cause problems in carriers unless one of the breakpoints disrupts important functional genes, has near submicroscopic copy number variants or hosts “cryptic” complex chromosomal rearrangements. Pericentric inversions can lead to imbalance in offspring. Less than 3% of Down syndrome patients have duplication as a result of parental pericentric inversion of chromosome 21. We report a family with an apparently balanced pericentric inversion of chromosome 21. The proband, a 23-year-old female was referred for prenatal diagnosis at 16 weeks gestation because of increased nuchal translucency. She has a familial history of Down's syndrome and moderate intellectual disability, a personal history of four spontaneous abortions and learning difficulties. Peripheral blood and amniotic fluid samples were collected to perform proband's and fetus' cytogenetic analyses. Additionally, another six family members were evaluated and cytogenetic analysis was performed. Complementary FISH and MLPA studies were carried out. An apparent balanced chromosome 21 pericentric inversion was observed in four family members, two revealed a recombinant chromosome 21 with partial trisomy, and one a full trisomy 21 with an inverted chromosome 21. Array CGH analysis was performed in the mother and the brother's proband. MLPA and aCGH studies identified a deletion of about 1.7 Mb on the long arm of inverted chromosome 21q22.11. We believe the cause of the intellectual disability/learning difficulties observed in the members with the inversion is related to this deletion. The recombinant chromosome 21 has a partial trisomy including the DSCR with no deletion. The risk for carriers of having a child with multiple malformations/intellectual disability is about 30% depending on whether and how this rearrangement interferes with meiosis.     

"Cri-du-chat" syndrome in a patient born to a mother with a paracentric inversion of chromosome 5q

We report the case of a female child presented at birth with hypotonia, growth retardation and respiratory distress. Chromosome study from peripheral blood showed a 46,XX,del(5)(p14pter) karyotype. Parental chromosome studies revealed that the mother carried an apparently balanced paracentric inversion of long arms of one chromosome 5, giving the karyotype 46,XX,inv(5)(q12q32), whereas paternal karyotype was normal. The maternal abnormality was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and was not present in the daughter's metaphases. Microsatellite analysis in the proposita and her parents permitted us to conclude that the deleted chromosome 5 was paternal in origin, as usually described. Therefore, as might have been expected, maternal paracentric inversion of chromosome 5q and "cri-du-chat syndrome" presented by the daughter were not related.     

Monosomy 9pter and trisomy 9q34.11qter in two sisters due to a maternal pericentric inversion

Pericentric inversions of chromosome 9 leading to unbalanced live-born offspring are relatively rare and so far only four cases have been reported. Here we present two sisters with an unbalanced recombinant chromosome 9 which resulted from a large maternal pericentric inversion inv(9)(p24.3q34.1). Further molecular characterisation of the aberrant chromosome 9 by 250k SNP array analysis showed a terminal 460 kb loss of 9p24.3 and a terminal 8.9 Mb gain of 9q34.11. We compared the clinical features of these two patients with the previous reported four cases as well as with patients with similar sized 9pter deletions or 9qter duplications. Based upon this study, we suggest that the recombinant chromosome 9 phenotype is mainly the result of duplication of a 3.4 Mb region of chromosome 9q34.11q34.13.     

Centric fission of chromosome 7 with 47,XX,del(7)(pter----cen::q21----qter)+cen fr karyotype in a mother and proximal 7q deletion in two malformed newborns

In the present paper we report a characteristic pattern of external and internal malformations in two male siblings with proximal 7q interstitial deletion as the unbalanced product of a rearranged chromosome 7 in the mother with karyotype 47,XX,del(7)(pter----cen::q21----qter),+fr. The interstitial 7q deletion in the mother included centromeric fission, break at 7q21 and preservation of the proximal q arm fragment.     

A complex chromosomal rearrangement with a translocation 4;10;14 in a fertile male carrier: ascertainment through an offspring with partial trisomy 14q13-->q24.1 and partial monosomy 4q27-->q28 [corrected

Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs) are usually associated with infertility or subfertility in male carriers. If fertility is maintained, there is a high risk of abnormal pregnancy outcome. Few male carriers have been identified by children presenting with mental retardation/congenital malformations (MR/CM) or by spontaneous abortions of the spouses. We report a de novo CCR with five breakpoints involving chromosomes 4, 10 and 14 in a male carrier who was ascertained through a son presenting with MR/CM due to an unbalanced karyotype with partial trisomy 14 and partial monosomy 4. The child has a healthy elder brother. In the family history no abortions were reported. No fertility treatment was necessary. Cytogenetic analysis from the affected son showed a reciprocal translocation t(4;10) with additional chromosomal material inserted between the translocation junctions in the derivative chromosome 10. The father showed the same derivative chromosome 10 but had additionally one aberrant chromosome 14. Further molecular cytogenetic analyses determined the inserted material in the aberrant chromosome 10 as derived from chromosome 14 and revealed a small translocation with material of chromosome 4 inserted into the derivative chromosome 14. Thus the phenotype of the son is supposed to be associated with a partial duplication 14q13-->q24.1 and a partial monosomy 4q27-->q28. Including our case we are aware of eleven CCR cases with fertile male carriers. In eight of these families normal offspring have been reported. We propose that exceptional CCRs in fertile male carriers might form comparatively simple pachytene configurations increasing the chance of healthy offspring.     

Novel chromosomal insertional translocation in chicken uncovered by double color FISH

A novel insertion 78,ZZ or 78,ZW, ins(3;1)(q25q27;undetermined) was revealed in chicken by double color fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). A fragment of chromosome 1 spanning either from q13-14 to q34-35, or from q14-21 to q36-41 bands, had been translocated to chromosome 3 at a site located between q25 to q27 bands. This has resulted in the generation of an interstitial deletion in chromosome 1 and an insertional translocation in chromosome 3. Chickens with this balanced insertional translocation are asymptomatic carriers and their fertility is not affected, but embryo mortality increases. Greater than 50% occurrence of unbalanced gametes are observed. However, progeny sex ratio is not affected.