��-Defensins in Enteric Innate Immunity: FUNCTIONAL PANETH CELL ��-DEFENSINS IN MOUSE COLONIC LUMEN*

Paneth cells are a secretory epithelial lineage that release dense core granules rich in host defense peptides and proteins from the base of small intestinal crypts. Enteric α-defensins, termed cryptdins (Crps) in mice, are highly abundant in Paneth cell secretions and inherently resistant to proteolysis. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that enteric α-defensins of Paneth cell origin persist in a functional state in the mouse large bowel lumen. To test this idea, putative Crps purified from mouse distal colonic lumen were characterized biochemically and assayed in vitro for bactericidal peptide activities. The peptides comigrated with cryptdin control peptides in acid-urea-PAGE and SDS-PAGE, providing identification as putative Crps. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry experiments showed that the molecular masses of the putative α-defensins matched those of the six most abundant known Crps, as well as N-terminally truncated forms of each, and that the peptides contain six Cys residues, consistent with identities as α-defensins. N-terminal sequencing definitively revealed peptides with N termini corresponding to full-length, (des-Leu)-truncated, and (des-Leu-Arg)-truncated N termini of Crps 1–4 and 6. Crps from mouse large bowel lumen were bactericidal in the low micromolar range. Thus, Paneth cell α-defensins secreted into the small intestinal lumen persist as intact and functional forms throughout the intestinal tract, suggesting that the peptides may mediate enteric innate immunity in the colonic lumen, far from their upstream point of secretion in small intestinal crypts.Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs)² are released by epithelial cells onto mucosal surfaces as effectors of innate immunity (1–5). In mammals, most AMPs derive from two major families, the cathelicidins and defensins (6). The defensins comprise the α-, β-, and θ-defensin subfamilies, which are defined by the presence of six cysteine residues paired in characteristic tridisulfide arrays (7). α-Defensins are highly abundant in two primary cell lineages: phagocytic leukocytes, primarily neutrophils, of myeloid origin and Paneth cells, which are secretory epithelial cells located at the base of the crypts of Lieberkühn in the small intestine (8–10). Neutrophil α-defensins are stored in azurophilic granules and contribute to non-oxidative microbial cell killing in phagolysosomes (11, 12), except in mice whose neutrophils lack defensins (13). In the small bowel, α-defensins and other host defense proteins (14–18) are released apically as components of Paneth cell secretory granules in response to cholinergic stimulation and after exposure to bacterial antigens (19). Therefore, the release of Paneth cell products into the crypt lumen is inferred to protect mitotically active crypt cells from colonization by potential pathogens and confer protection against enteric infection (7, 20, 21).Under normal, homeostatic conditions, Paneth cells are not found outside the small bowel, although they may appear ectopically in response to local inflammation throughout the gastrointestinal tract (22, 23). Paneth cell numbers increase progressively throughout the small intestine, occurring at highest numbers in the distal ileum (24). Mouse Paneth cells express numerous α-defensin isoforms, termed cryptdins (Crps) (25), that have broad spectrum antimicrobial activities (6, 26). Collectively, α-defensins constitute approximately seventy percent of the bactericidal peptide activity in mouse Paneth cell secretions (19), selectively killing bacteria by membrane-disruptive mechanisms (27–30). The role of Paneth cell α-defensins in gastrointestinal mucosal immunity is evident from studies of mice transgenic for human enteric α-defensin-5, HD-5, which are immune to infection by orally administered Salmonella enterica sv. typhimurium (S. typhimurium) (31).The biosynthesis of mature, bactericidal α-defensins from their inactive precursors requires activation by lineage-specific proteolytic convertases. In mouse Paneth cells, inactive ∼8.4-kDa Crp precursors are processed intracellularly into microbicidal ∼4-kDa Crps by specific cleavage events mediated by matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) (32, 33). MMP-7 null mice exhibit increased susceptibility to systemic S. typhimurium infection and decreased clearance of orally administered non-invasive Escherichia coli (19, 32). Although the α-defensin proregions are sensitive to proteolysis, the mature, disulfide-stabilized peptides resist digestion by their converting enzymes in vitro, whether the convertase is MMP-7 (32), trypsin (34), or neutrophil serine proteinases (35). Because α-defensins resist proteolysis in vitro, we hypothesized that Paneth cell α-defensins resist degradation and remain in a functional state in the large bowel, a complex, hostile environment containing varied proteases of both host and microbial origin.Here, we report on the isolation and characterization of a population of enteric α-defensins from the mouse colonic lumen. Full-length and N-terminally truncated Paneth cell α-defensins were identified and are abundant in the distal large bowel lumen.     

Structural and Functional Elucidation of the Mechanism Promoting Error-prone Synthesis by Human DNA Polymerase �� Opposite the 7,8-Dihydro-8-oxo-2��-deoxyguanosine Adduct

Human polymerase kappa (hPol κ) is one of four eukaryotic Y-class DNA polymerases and may be an important element in the cellular response to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons such as benzo[a]pyrene, which can lead to reactive oxygenated metabolite-mediated oxidative stress. Here, we present a detailed analysis of the activity and specificity of hPol κ bypass opposite the major oxidative adduct 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxoG). Unlike its archaeal homolog Dpo4, hPol κ bypasses this lesion in an error-prone fashion by inserting mainly dATP. Analysis of transient-state kinetics shows diminished “bursts” for dATP:8-oxoG and dCTP:8-oxoG incorporation, indicative of non-productive complex formation, but dATP:8-oxoG insertion events that do occur are 2-fold more efficient than dCTP:G insertion events. Crystal structures of ternary hPol κ complexes with adducted template-primer DNA reveal non-productive (dGTP and dATP) alignments of incoming nucleotide and 8-oxoG. Structural limitations placed upon the hPol κ by interactions between the N-clasp and finger domains combined with stabilization of the syn-oriented template 8-oxoG through the side chain of Met-135 both appear to contribute to error-prone bypass. Mutating Leu-508 in the little finger domain of hPol κ to lysine modulates the insertion opposite 8-oxoG toward more accurate bypass, similar to previous findings with Dpo4. Our structural and activity data provide insight into important mechanistic aspects of error-prone bypass of 8-oxoG by hPol κ compared with accurate and efficient bypass of the lesion by Dpo4 and polymerase η.DNA damage incurred by a multitude of endogenous and exogenous factors constitutes an inevitable challenge for the replication machinery, and various mechanisms exist to either remove the resulting lesions or bypass them in a more or less mutation-prone fashion (1). Error-prone polymerases are central to trans-lesion synthesis across sites of damaged DNA (2, 3). Four so-called Y-class DNA polymerases have been identified in humans, Pol η,⁴ Pol ι, Pol κ, and Rev1, which exhibit different activities and abilities to replicate past a flurry of individual lesions (4, 5). Homologs have also been identified and characterized in other organisms, notably DinB (Pol IV) in Escherichia coli (6–8), Dbh in Sulfolobus acidocaldarius (9, 10), and Dpo4 in Sulfolobus solfataricus (11, 12). A decade of investigations directed at the structural and functional properties of bypass polymerases have significantly improved our understanding of this class of enzymes (5, 13). A unique feature of Y-class polymerases, compared with the common right-handed arrangement of palm, thumb, and finger subdomains of high fidelity (i.e. A-class) DNA polymerases (14), is a “little finger” or “PAD” (palm-associated domain) subdomain that plays a crucial role in lesion bypass (12, 15–21). In addition to the little finger subdomain at the C-terminal end of the catalytic core, both Rev1 and Pol κ exhibit an N-terminal extension that is absent in other translesion polymerases. The N-terminal extension in the structure of the ternary (human) hPol κ·DNA·dTTP complex folds into a U-shaped tether-helix-turn-helix “clasp” that is located between the thumb and little finger domains, allowing the polymerase to completely encircle the DNA (18). Although the precise role of the clasp for lesion bypass by hPol κ remains to be established, it is clear that this entity is functionally important, because mutant enzymes with partially or completely removed clasps exhibit diminished catalytic activity compared with the full-length catalytic core (hPol κ N1–526) or a core lacking the N-terminal 19 residues (hPol κ N19–526; the construct used for crystal structure determination of the ternary complex (18)).7,8-Dihydro-8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxoG), found in both lower organisms and eukaryotes, is a major lesion that is a consequence of oxidative stress. The lesion is of relevance not only because of its association with cancer (22, 23), but also in connection with aging (24), hepatitis (25), and infertility (26). It is far from clear which DNA polymerases bypass 8-oxoG most often in a cellular context, but given the ubiquitous nature of the lesion it seems likely that more than one enzyme could encounter the lesion. Replicative polymerases commonly insert dATP opposite template 8-oxoG, with the lesion adopting the preferred syn conformation (e.g. 27, 28). It was recently found that the translesion polymerase Dpo4 from S. solfataricus synthesizes efficiently past 8-oxoG, inserting ≥95% dCTP > dATP opposite the lesion (29, 30). The efficient and low error bypass of the 8-oxoG lesion by Dpo4 is associated to a large extent with an arginine residue in the little finger domain (17). In the crystal structure of the ternary Dpo4·DNA·dCTP complex, the side chain of Arg-332 forms a hydrogen bond to the 8-oxygen of 8-oxoG, thus shifting the nucleoside conformational equilibrium toward the anti state and enabling a Watson-Crick binding mode with the incoming dCTP (30). The efficient and accurate replication of templates bearing 8-oxoG by yeast Pol η (31, 32) may indicate similarities between the bypass reactions catalyzed by the archaeal and eukaryotic enzymes. In contrast, bypass synthesis opposite 8-oxoG by human Pol κ is error-prone, resulting in efficient incorporation of A (33–35). The inaccurate bypass of 8-oxoG is thought to contribute to the deleterious effects associated with the lesion. These observations indicate different behaviors of the eukaryotic trans-lesion Pol κ and its archaeal “homolog” Dpo4 vis-à-vis the major oxidative stress lesion 8-oxoG. A mechanistic understanding of human DNA polymerases that bypass 8-oxoG in an error-prone fashion, such as hPol κ, is therefore of great interest.To elucidate commonalities and differences between the trans-8-oxoG syntheses of S. solfataricus Dpo4, yeast Pol η, and hPol κ, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the bypass activity for the latter with template·DNA containing the 8-oxoG lesion, including pre-steady-state and steady-state kinetics of primer extension opposite and beyond 8-oxoG and LC-MS/MS assays of full-length extension products. We determined crystal structures of ternary hPol κ-(8-oxoG)DNA-dGTP and hPol κ-(8-oxoG)DNA-dATP complexes, apparently the first for any complex with adducted DNA for the κ enzyme reported to date. Our work demonstrates clear distinctions between genetically related translesion polymerases and provides insights into the origins of the error-prone reactions opposite 8-oxoG catalyzed by Y-family DNA polymerases.     

PR55��, a Regulatory Subunit of PP2A, Specifically Regulates PP2A-mediated ��-Catenin Dephosphorylation

A central question in Wnt signaling is the regulation of β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. Multiple kinases, including CKIα and GSK3, are involved in β-catenin phosphorylation. Protein phosphatases such as PP2A and PP1 have been implicated in the regulation of β-catenin. However, which phosphatase dephosphorylates β-catenin in vivo and how the specificity of β-catenin dephosphorylation is regulated are not clear. In this study, we show that PP2A regulates β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation in vivo. We demonstrate that PP2A is required for Wnt/β-catenin signaling in Drosophila. Moreover, we have identified PR55α as the regulatory subunit of PP2A that controls β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. PR55α, but not the catalytic subunit, PP2Ac, directly interacts with β-catenin. RNA interference knockdown of PR55α elevates β-catenin phosphorylation and decreases Wnt signaling, whereas overexpressing PR55α enhances Wnt signaling. Taken together, our results suggest that PR55α specifically regulates PP2A-mediated β-catenin dephosphorylation and plays an essential role in Wnt signaling.Wnt/β-catenin signaling plays essential roles in development and tumorigenesis (1–3). Our previous work found that β-catenin is sequentially phosphorylated by CKIα⁴ and GSK3 (4), which creates a binding site for β-Trcp (5), leading to degradation via the ubiquitination/proteasome machinery (3). Mutations in β-catenin or APC genes that prevent β-catenin phosphorylation or ubiquitination/degradation lead ultimately to cancer (1, 2).In addition to the involvement of kinases, protein phosphatases, such as PP1, PP2A, and PP2C, are also implicated in Wnt/β-catenin regulation. PP2C and PP1 may regulate dephosphorylation of Axin and play positive roles in Wnt signaling (6, 7). PP2A is a multisubunit enzyme (8–10); it has been reported to play either positive or negative roles in Wnt signaling likely by targeting different components (11–21). Toward the goal of understanding the mechanism of β-catenin phosphorylation, we carried out siRNA screening targeting several major phosphatases, in which we found that PP2A dephosphorylates β-catenin. This is consistent with a recent study where PP2A is shown to dephosphorylate β-catenin in a cell-free system (18).PP2A consists of a catalytic subunit (PP2Ac), a structure subunit (PR65/A), and variable regulatory B subunits (PR/B, PR/B′, PR/B″, or PR/B‴). The substrate specificity of PP2A is thought to be determined by its B subunit (9). By siRNA screening, we further identified that PR55α, a regulatory subunit of PP2A, specifically regulates β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. Mechanistically, we found that PR55α directly interacts with β-catenin and regulates PP2A-mediated β-catenin dephosphorylation in Wnt signaling.     

Loop 2 Structure in Glycine and GABAA Receptors Plays a Key Role in Determining Ethanol Sensitivity

The present study tests the hypothesis that the structure of extracellular domain Loop 2 can markedly affect ethanol sensitivity in glycine receptors (GlyRs) and γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA_ARs). To test this, we mutated Loop 2 in the α1 subunit of GlyRs and in the γ subunit of α1β2γ2GABA_ARs and measured the sensitivity of wild type and mutant receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes to agonist, ethanol, and other agents using two-electrode voltage clamp. Replacing Loop 2 of α1GlyR subunits with Loop 2 from the δGABA_AR (δL2), but not the γGABA_AR subunit, reduced ethanol threshold and increased the degree of ethanol potentiation without altering general receptor function. Similarly, replacing Loop 2 of the γ subunit of GABA_ARs with δL2 shifted the ethanol threshold from 50 mm in WT to 1 mm in the GABA_A γ-δL2 mutant. These findings indicate that the structure of Loop 2 can profoundly affect ethanol sensitivity in GlyRs and GABA_ARs. The δL2 mutations did not affect GlyR or GABA_AR sensitivity, respectively, to Zn²⁺ or diazepam, which suggests that these δL2-induced changes in ethanol sensitivity do not extend to all allosteric modulators and may be specific for ethanol or ethanol-like agents. To explore molecular mechanisms underlying these results, we threaded the WT and δL2 GlyR sequences onto the x-ray structure of the bacterial Gloeobacter violaceus pentameric ligand-gated ion channel homologue (GLIC). In addition to being the first GlyR model threaded on GLIC, the juxtaposition of the two structures led to a possible mechanistic explanation for the effects of ethanol on GlyR-based on changes in Loop 2 structure.Alcohol abuse and dependence are significant problems in our society, with ∼14 million people in the United States being affected (1, 2). Alcohol causes over 100,000 deaths in the United States, and alcohol-related issues are estimated to cost nearly 200 billion dollars annually (2). To address this, considerable attention has focused on the development of medications to prevent and treat alcohol-related problems (3–5). The development of such medications would be aided by a clear understanding of the molecular structures on which ethanol acts and how these structures influence receptor sensitivity to ethanol.Ligand-gated ion channels (LGICs)² have received substantial attention as putative sites of ethanol action that cause its behavioral effects (6–12). Research in this area has focused on investigating the effects of ethanol on two large superfamilies of LGICs: 1) the Cys-loop superfamily of LGICs (13, 14), whose members include nicotinic acetylcholine, 5-hydroxytryptamine₃, γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA_A), γ-aminobutyric acid type C, and glycine receptors (GlyRs) (10, 11, 15–20) and 2) the glutamate superfamily, including N-methyl d-aspartate, α-amino-3-hydroxyisoxazolepropionic acid, and kainate receptors (21, 22). Recent studies have also begun investigating ethanol action in the ATP-gated P2X superfamily of LGICs (23–25).A series of studies that employed chimeric and mutagenic strategies combined with sulfhydryl-specific labeling identified key regions within Cys-loop receptors that appear to be initial targets for ethanol action that also can determine the sensitivity of the receptors to ethanol (7–12, 18, 19, 26–30). This work provides several lines of evidence that position 267 and possibly other sites in the transmembrane (TM) domain of GlyRs and homologous sites in GABA_ARs are targets for ethanol action and that mutations at these sites can influence ethanol sensitivity (8, 9, 26, 31).Growing evidence from GlyRs indicates that ethanol also acts on the extracellular domain. The initial findings came from studies demonstrating that α1GlyRs are more sensitive to ethanol than are α2GlyRs despite the high (∼78%) sequence homology between α1GlyRs and α2GlyRs (32). Further work found that an alanine to serine exchange at position 52 (A52S) in Loop 2 can eliminate the difference in ethanol sensitivity between α1GlyRs and α2GlyRs (18, 20, 33). These studies also demonstrated that mutations at position 52 in α1GlyRS and the homologous position 59 in α2GlyRs controlled the sensitivity of these receptors to a novel mechanistic ethanol antagonist (20). Collectively, these studies suggest that there are multiple sites of ethanol action in α1GlyRs, with one site located in the TM domain (e.g. position 267) and another in the extracellular domain (e.g. position 52).Subsequent studies revealed that the polarity of the residue at position 52 plays a key role in determining the sensitivity of GlyRs to ethanol (20). The findings with polarity in the extracellular domain contrast with the findings at position 267 in the TM domain, where molecular volume, but not polarity, significantly affected ethanol sensitivity (9). Taken together, these findings indicate that the physical-chemical parameters of residues at positions in the extracellular and TM domains that modulate ethanol effects and/or initiate ethanol action in GlyRs are not uniform. Thus, knowledge regarding the physical-chemical properties that control agonist and ethanol sensitivity is key for understanding the relationship between the structure and the actions of ethanol in LGICs (19, 31, 34–40).GlyRs and GABA_ARs, which differ significantly in their sensitivities to ethanol, offer a potential method for identifying the structures that control ethanol sensitivity. For example, α1GlyRs do not reliably respond to ethanol concentrations less than 10 mm (32, 33, 41). Similarly, γ subunit-containing GABA_ARs (e.g. α1β2γ2), the most predominantly expressed GABA_ARs in the central nervous system, are insensitive to ethanol concentrations less than 50 mm (42, 43). In contrast, δ subunit-containing GABA_ARs (e.g. α4β3δ) have been shown to be sensitive to ethanol concentrations as low as 1–3 mm (44–51). Sequence alignment of α1GlyR, γGABA_AR, and δGABA_AR revealed differences between the Loop 2 regions of these receptor subunits. Since prior studies found that mutations of Loop 2 residues can affect ethanol sensitivity (19, 20, 39), the non-conserved residues in Loop 2 of GlyR and GABA_AR subunits could provide the physical-chemical and structural bases underlying the differences in ethanol sensitivity between these receptors.The present study tested the hypothesis that the structure of Loop 2 can markedly affect the ethanol sensitivity of GlyRs and GABA_ARs. To accomplish this, we performed multiple mutations that replaced the Loop 2 region of the α1 subunit in α1GlyRs and the Loop 2 region of the γ subunit of α1β2γ2 GABA_ARs with corresponding non-conserved residues from the δ subunit of GABA_AR and tested the sensitivity of these receptors to ethanol. As predicted, replacing Loop 2 of WT α1GlyRs with the homologous residues from the δGABA_AR subunit (δL2), but not the γGABA_AR subunit (γL2), markedly increased the sensitivity of the receptor to ethanol. Similarly, replacing the non-conserved residues of the γ subunit of α1β2γ2 GABA_ARs with δL2 also markedly increased ethanol sensitivity of GABA_ARs. These findings support the hypothesis and suggest that Loop 2 may play a role in controlling ethanol sensitivity across the Cys-loop superfamily of receptors. The findings also provide the basis for suggesting structure-function relationships in a new molecular model of the GlyR based on the bacterial Gloeobacter violaceus pentameric LGIC homologue (GLIC).     

Proinsulin and the Genetics of Diabetes Mellitus

Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.     

In Vitro Characterization of a Recombinant Blh Protein from an Uncultured Marine Bacterium as a ��-Carotene 15,15��-Dioxygenase

Codon optimization was used to synthesize the blh gene from the uncultured marine bacterium 66A03 for expression in Escherichia coli. The expressed enzyme cleaved β-carotene at its central double bond (15,15′) to yield two molecules of all-trans-retinal. The molecular mass of the native purified enzyme was ∼64 kDa as a dimer of 32-kDa subunits. The K_m, k_cat, and k_cat/K_m values for β-carotene as substrate were 37 μm, 3.6 min⁻¹, and 97 mm⁻¹ min⁻¹, respectively. The enzyme exhibited the highest activity for β-carotene, followed by β-cryptoxanthin, β-apo-4′-carotenal, α-carotene, and γ-carotene in decreasing order, but not for β-apo-8′-carotenal, β-apo-12′-carotenal, lutein, zeaxanthin, or lycopene, suggesting that the presence of one unsubstituted β-ionone ring in a substrate with a molecular weight greater than C₃₅ seems to be essential for enzyme activity. The oxygen atom of retinal originated not from water but from molecular oxygen, suggesting that the enzyme was a β-carotene 15,15′-dioxygenase. Although the Blh protein and β-carotene 15,15′-monooxygenases catalyzed the same biochemical reaction, the Blh protein was unrelated to the mammalian β-carotene 15,15′-monooxygenases as assessed by their different properties, including DNA and amino acid sequences, molecular weight, form of association, reaction mechanism, kinetic properties, and substrate specificity. This is the first report of in vitro characterization of a bacterial β-carotene-cleaving enzyme.Vitamin A (retinol) is a fat-soluble vitamin and important for human health. In vivo, the cleavage of β-carotene to retinal is an important step of vitamin A synthesis. The cleavage can proceed via two different biochemical pathways (1, 2). The major pathway is a central cleavage catalyzed by mammalian β-carotene 15,15′-monooxygenases (EC 1.14.99.36). β-Carotene is cleaved by the enzyme symmetrically into two molecules of all-trans-retinal, and retinal is then converted to vitamin A in vivo (3–5). The second pathway is an eccentric cleavage that occurs at double bonds other than the central 15,15′-double bond of β-carotene to produce β-apo-carotenals with different chain lengths, which are catalyzed by carotenoid oxygenases from mammals, plants, and cyanobacteria (6). These β-apo-carotenals are degraded to one molecule of retinal, which is subsequently converted to vitamin A in vivo (2).β-Carotene 15,15′-monooxygenase was first isolated as a cytosolic enzyme by identifying the product of β-carotene cleavage as retinal (7). The characterization of the enzyme and the reaction pathway from β-carotene to retinal were also investigated (4, 8). The enzyme activity has been found in mammalian intestinal mucosa, jejunum enterocytes, liver, lung, kidney, and brain (5, 9, 10). Molecular cloning, expression, and characterization of β-carotene 15,15′-monooxygenase have been reported from various species, including chickens (11), fruit flies (12), humans (13), mice (14), and zebra fishes (15).Other proteins thought to convert β-carotene to retinal include bacterioopsin-related protein (Brp) and bacteriorhodopsin-related protein-like homolog protein (Blh) (16). Brp protein is expressed from the bop gene cluster, which encodes the structural protein bacterioopsin, consisting of at least three genes as follows: bop (bacterioopsin), brp (bacteriorhodopsin-related protein), and bat (bacterioopsin activator) (17). brp genes were reported in Haloarcula marismortui (18), Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 (19), Halobacterium halobium (17), Haloquadratum walsbyi, and Salinibacter ruber (20). Blh protein is expressed from the proteorhodopsin gene cluster, which contains proteorhodopsin, crtE (geranylgeranyl-diphosphate synthase), crtI (phytoene dehydrogenase), crtB (phytoene synthase), crtY (lycopene cyclase), idi (isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase), and blh gene (21). Sources of blh genes were previously reported in Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 (19), Haloarcula marismortui (18), Halobacterium salinarum (22), uncultured marine bacterium 66A03 (16), and uncultured marine bacterium HF10 49E08 (21). β-Carotene biosynthetic genes crtE, crtB, crtI, crtY, ispA, and idi encode the enzymes necessary for the synthesis of β-carotene from isopentenyl diphosphate, and the Idi, IspA, CrtE, CrtB, CrtI, and CrtY proteins have been characterized in vitro (23–28). Blh protein has been proposed to catalyze or regulate the conversion of β-carotene to retinal (29, 30), but there is no direct proof of the enzymatic activity.In this study, we used codon optimization to synthesize the blh gene from the uncultured marine bacterium 66A03 for expression in Escherichia coli, and we performed a detailed biochemical and enzymological characterization of the expressed Blh protein. In addition, the properties of the enzyme were compared with those of mammalian β-carotene 15,15′-monooxygenases.     

Architecture and Molecular Mechanism of PAN, the Archaeal Proteasome Regulatory ATPase

In Archaea, an hexameric ATPase complex termed PAN promotes proteins unfolding and translocation into the 20 S proteasome. PAN is highly homologous to the six ATPases of the eukaryotic 19 S proteasome regulatory complex. Thus, insight into the mechanism of PAN function may reveal a general mode of action mutual to the eukaryotic 19 S proteasome regulatory complex. In this study we generated a three-dimensional model of PAN from tomographic reconstruction of negatively stained particles. Surprisingly, this reconstruction indicated that the hexameric complex assumes a two-ring structure enclosing a large cavity. Assessment of distinct three-dimensional functional states of PAN in the presence of adenosine 5′-O-(thiotriphosphate) and ADP and in the absence of nucleotides outlined a possible mechanism linking nucleotide binding and hydrolysis to substrate recognition, unfolding, and translocation. A novel feature of the ATPase complex revealed in this study is a gate controlling the “exit port” of the regulatory complex and, presumably, translocation into the 20 S proteasome. Based on our structural and biochemical findings, we propose a possible model in which substrate binding and unfolding are linked to structural transitions driven by nucleotide binding and hydrolysis, whereas translocation into the proteasome only depends upon the presence of an unfolded substrate and binding but not hydrolysis of nucleotide.In eukaryotic cells most protein breakdown in the cytosol and nucleus is catalyzed by the 26 S proteasome. This ∼2.5-MDa (1) complex degrades ubiquitin-conjugated and certain non-ubiquitinated proteins in an ATP-dependent manner (2, 3). The 26 S complex is composed of one or two 19 S regulatory particles situated at the ends of the cylindrical 20 S proteasome. Within the 26 S complex, proteins are hydrolyzed in the 20 S proteasome. Tagged substrates, however, first bind to the 19 S regulatory particle, which catalyzes their unfolding and translocation into the 20 S subcomplex (4, 5). The 19 S regulatory particle consists of at least 17 different subunits (1, 6). Nine of these subunits form a “lid,” whereas the other eight subunits, including six ATPases, comprise the base of the 19 S particle. Electron microscopy (7–10) as well as cross-linking experiments (11, 12) have demonstrated that the six homologous ATPases are associated with the α rings of the 20 S particle.Unlike eukaryotes, Archaea and certain eubacteria contain homologous 20 S particles but lack ubiquitin. Their proteasomes degrade proteins in association with a hexameric ATPase ring complex termed PAN (13). PAN appears to be the evolutionary precursor of the 19 S base, predating the coupling of ubiquitination and proteolysis in eukaryotes (14). In addition, PAN recognizes the bacterial targeting sequence ssrA (in analogy to the polyubiquitin conjugates in eukaryotes) and efficiently unfolds and translocates globular substrates, like green fluorescent protein, when tagged with ssrA (15). In both PAN and the 19 S proteasome regulatory complexes, ATP is essential for substrate unfolding and translocation and for opening of the gated channel in the α ring through which substrates enter the 20 S particle (15–17). Because this portal is quite narrow (18–20), only extended polypeptides can enter the 20 S proteasome. Consequently, a globular substrate must be unfolded by the associated ATPase complex to be translocated and digested within the 20 S particle.PAN and the six ATPases found at the base of the 19 S particle are members of the AAA+ superfamily of multimeric ATPases which also includes the ATP-dependent proteases Lon and FtsH and the regulatory components of the bacterial ATP-dependent proteases ClpAP, ClpXP, and HslUV (8, 21). For mechanistic studies of the roles of ATP, the simpler archaeal PAN-20 S system offers many technical advantages over the much more complex 26 S proteasome. For example, prior studies of PAN (17, 22) demonstrated that unfolding of globular substrates (e.g. green fluorescent protein-ssrA) requires ATP hydrolysis. The same was also shown for the Escherichia coli ATP-dependent proteases ClpXP (23) and ClpAP (24). We have also shown that unfolding by PAN can take place on the surface of the ATPase ring in the absence of translocation (15). Thus, unfolding seems to proceed independently from protein translocation into the 20 S proteolytic particle. It is noteworthy that other studies suggest that proteins are unfolded by energy-dependent translocation through the ATPase ring (25, 26). These studies have suggested that the translocation of an unfolded polypeptide from the ATPase into the 20 S core is an active process that is coupled to ATP hydrolysis. A key to underline a detailed molecular mechanism for substrate binding, unfolding, and translocation by the proteasome regulatory ATPase complex is improved understanding of its architecture and the nucleotide-dependent structural transitions that afford these functions.To date we and others have failed to generate micrographs suitable for three-dimensional reconstruction of PAN using single-particle EM analysis. Likewise, structural information regarding the three-dimensional architecture and subunit organization within the 19 S particle is very limited. In fact, high resolution three-dimensional information on the 19 S complex is not yet available. Most knowledge available is based on cross-linking experiments (11, 12) as well as EM structural analysis (7–10), which provided a three-dimensional model outline of the general architecture of the 26 S complex. Unlike the 19 S complex, the structure of the 20 S subcomplex was determined by x-ray crystallography (18, 19). In contrast to the highly homogenous structure of the 20 S complex, the structural heterogeneity and flexibility of the 19 S subcomplex is presumably reflected in multiple conformations, which in turn also contribute to the difficulty in generating a high resolution three-dimensional structural model of the 26 S proteasome. Accordingly, the initial goal of this study was to generate a three-dimensional model of PAN that will allow us to determine its general architecture and to correlate unique conformational transitions within this ATPase with the nucleotide state of the complex (i.e. in the presence of ATPγS, ADP, or in the absence of nucleotides).Smith et al. (27) suggested a general architecture for the PAN-20 S complex based on two-dimensional averaging of a Thermoplasma acidophilum (TA)³ 20 S proteasome and Methanococcus jannaschii (MJ) PAN hybrid complex in the presence of ATPγS. Based on side-view projections of that complex, these authors proposed that PAN assumes an overall structure similar to E. coli HslU (28–30).We realized that although PAN appears heterogeneous in electron micrographs, it does not occupy all possible orientations when adsorbed to carbon-coated electron microscopy (EM) grids, a prerequisite for single particle analysis. This problem was overcome by applying electron tomography in conjunction with a three-dimensional averaging procedure that accounts for the missing wedge in the Fourier space of electron tomograms (31, 32). The three-dimensional model generated revealed an unexpected architecture leading to a possible molecular mechanism describing the function of PAN and presumably the 19 S ATPases.     

Conformational Properties of ��-PrP

Prion propagation involves a conformational transition of the cellular form of prion protein (PrP^C) to a disease-specific isomer (PrP^Sc), shifting from a predominantly α-helical conformation to one dominated by β-sheet structure. This conformational transition is of critical importance in understanding the molecular basis for prion disease. Here, we elucidate the conformational properties of a disulfide-reduced fragment of human PrP spanning residues 91–231 under acidic conditions, using a combination of heteronuclear NMR, analytical ultracentrifugation, and circular dichroism. We find that this form of the protein, which similarly to PrP^Sc, is a potent inhibitor of the 26 S proteasome, assembles into soluble oligomers that have significant β-sheet content. The monomeric precursor to these oligomers exhibits many of the characteristics of a molten globule intermediate with some helical character in regions that form helices I and III in the PrP^C conformation, whereas helix II exhibits little evidence for adopting a helical conformation, suggesting that this region is a likely source of interaction within the initial phases of the transformation to a β-rich conformation. This precursor state is almost as compact as the folded PrP^C structure and, as it assembles, only residues 126–227 are immobilized within the oligomeric structure, leaving the remainder in a mobile, random-coil state.Prion diseases, such as Creutzfeldt-Jacob and Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker in humans, scrapie in sheep, and bovine spongiform encephalopathy in cattle, are fatal neurological disorders associated with the deposition of an abnormally folded form of a host-encoded glycoprotein, prion (PrP)² (1). These diseases may be inherited, arise sporadically, or be acquired through the transmission of an infectious agent (2, 3). The disease-associated form of the protein, termed the scrapie form or PrP^Sc, differs from the normal cellular form (PrP^C) through a conformational change, resulting in a significant increase in the β-sheet content and protease resistance of the protein (3, 4). PrP^C, in contrast, consists of a predominantly α-helical structured domain and an unstructured N-terminal domain, which is capable of binding a number of divalent metals (5–12). A single disulfide bond links two of the main α-helices and forms an integral part of the core of the structured domain (13, 14).According to the protein-only hypothesis (15), the infectious agent is composed of a conformational isomer of PrP (16) that is able to convert other isoforms to the infectious isomer in an autocatalytic manner. Despite numerous studies, little is known about the mechanism of conversion of PrP^C to PrP^Sc. The most coherent and general model proposed thus far is that PrP^C fluctuates between the dominant native state and minor conformations, one or a set of which can self-associate in an ordered manner to produce a stable supramolecular structure composed of misfolded PrP monomers (3, 17). This stable, oligomeric species can then bind to, and stabilize, rare non-native monomer conformations that are structurally complementary. In this manner, new monomeric chains are recruited and the system can propagate.In view of the above model, considerable effort has been devoted to generating and characterizing alternative, possibly PrP^Sc-like, conformations in the hope of identifying common properties or features that facilitate the formation of amyloid oligomers. This has been accomplished either through PrP^Sc-dependent conversion reactions (18–20) or through conversion of PrP^C in the absence of a PrP^Sc template (21–25). The latter approach, using mainly disulfide-oxidized recombinant PrP, has generated a wide range of novel conformations formed under non-physiological conditions where the native state is relatively destabilized. These conformations have ranged from near-native (14, 26, 27), to those that display significant β-sheet content (21, 23, 28–33). The majority of these latter species have shown a high propensity for aggregation, although not all are on-pathway to the formation of amyloid. Many of these non-native states also display some of the characteristics of PrP^Sc, such as increased β-sheet content, protease resistance, and a propensity for oligomerization (28, 29, 31) and some have been claimed to be associated with the disease process (34).One such PrP folding intermediate, termed β-PrP, differs from the majority of studied PrP intermediate states in that it is formed by refolding the PrP molecule from the native α-helical conformation (here termed α-PrP), at acidic pH in a reduced state, with the disulfide bond broken (22, 35). Although no covalent differences between the PrP^C and PrP^Sc have been consistently identified to date, the role of the disulfide bond in prion propagation remains disputed (25, 36–39). β-PrP is rich in β-sheet structure (22, 35), and displays many of the characteristics of a PrP^Sc-like precursor molecule, such as partial resistance to proteinase K digestion, and the ability to form amyloid fibrils in the presence of physiological concentrations of salts (40).The β-PrP species previously characterized, spanning residues 91–231 of PrP, was soluble at low ionic strength buffers and monomeric, according to elution volume on gel filtration (22). NMR analysis showed that it displayed radically different spectra to those of α-PrP, with considerably fewer observable peaks and markedly reduced chemical shift dispersion. Data from circular dichroism experiments showed that fixed side chain (tertiary) interactions were lost, in contrast to the well defined β-sheet secondary structure, and thus in conjunction with the NMR data, indicated that β-PrP possessed a number of characteristics associated with a “molten globule” folding intermediate (22). Such states have been proposed to be important in amyloid and fibril formation (41). Indeed, antibodies raised against β-PrP (e.g. ICSM33) are capable of recognizing native PrP^Sc (but not PrP^C) (42–44). Subsequently, a related study examining the role of the disulfide bond in PrP folding confirmed that a monomeric molten globule-like form of PrP was formed on refolding the disulfide-reduced protein at acidic pH, but reported that, under their conditions, the circular dichroism response interpreted as β-sheet structure was associated with protein oligomerization (45). Indeed, atomic force microscopy on oligomeric full-length β-PrP (residues 23–231) shows small, round particles, showing that it is capable of formation of oligomers without forming fibrils (35). Notably, however, salt-induced oligomeric β-PrP has been shown to be a potent inhibitor of the 26 S proteasome, in a similar manner to PrP^Sc (46). Impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in vivo has been linked to prion neuropathology in prion-infected mice (46).Although the global properties of several PrP intermediate states have been determined (30–32, 35), no information on their conformational properties on a sequence-specific basis has been obtained. Their conformational properties are considered important, as the elucidation of the chain conformation may provide information on the way in which these chains pack in the assembly process, and also potentially provide clues on the mechanism of amyloid assembly and the phenomenon of prion strains. As the conformational fluctuations and heterogeneity of molten globule states give rise to broad NMR spectra that preclude direct observation of their conformational properties by NMR (47–50), here we use denaturant titration experiments to determine the conformational properties of β-PrP, through the population of the unfolded state that is visible by NMR. In addition, we use circular dichroism and analytical ultracentrifugation to examine the global structural properties, and the distribution of multimeric species that are formed from β-PrP.     

Thioredoxin-independent Regulation of Metabolism by the ��-Arrestin Proteins

Thioredoxin-interacting protein (Txnip), originally characterized as an inhibitor of thioredoxin, is now known to be a critical regulator of glucose metabolism in vivo. Txnip is a member of the α-arrestin protein family; the α-arrestins are related to the classical β-arrestins and visual arrestins. Txnip is the only α-arrestin known to bind thioredoxin, and it is not known whether the metabolic effects of Txnip are related to its ability to bind thioredoxin or related to conserved α-arrestin function. Here we show that wild type Txnip and Txnip C247S, a Txnip mutant that does not bind thioredoxin in vitro, both inhibit glucose uptake in mature adipocytes and in primary skin fibroblasts. Furthermore, we show that Txnip C247S does not bind thioredoxin in cells, using thiol alkylation to trap the Txnip-thioredoxin complex. Because Txnip function was independent of thioredoxin binding, we tested whether inhibition of glucose uptake was conserved in the related α-arrestins Arrdc4 and Arrdc3. Both Txnip and Arrdc4 inhibited glucose uptake and lactate output, while Arrdc3 had no effect. Structure-function analysis indicated that Txnip and Arrdc4 inhibit glucose uptake independent of the C-terminal WW-domain binding motifs, recently identified as important in yeast α-arrestins. Instead, regulation of glucose uptake was intrinsic to the arrestin domains themselves. These data demonstrate that Txnip regulates cellular metabolism independent of its binding to thioredoxin and reveal the arrestin domains as crucial structural elements in metabolic functions of α-arrestin proteins.Thioredoxin-interacting protein (Txnip),³ an inhibitor of thioredoxin disulfide reductase activity in vitro (1–3), is robustly induced by glucose (4–6) and a critical regulator of metabolism in vivo (7–10). In humans, Txnip expression is suppressed by insulin and strongly up-regulated in diabetes (7). Txnip-deficient mice have fasting hypoglycemia and ketosis (8, 9, 11, 12) with a striking enhancement of glucose uptake by peripheral tissues (8, 9). We have proposed that Txnip inhibits thioredoxin by forming a mixed disulfide with thioredoxin at its catalytic active site cysteines in a disulfide exchange reaction (13). However, it is not known how Txnip metabolic functions relate to its ability to bind thioredoxin.Structurally, Txnip belongs to the arrestin superfamily of proteins (14). The prototypical arrestins (the visual arrestins and the β-arrestins) are key regulators of receptor signaling. The β-arrestins, named for their interaction with the β-adrenergic receptor, are now known to control signaling through the multiple families of receptors (15). These arrestin proteins have two wing-like arrestin domains arranged around a central core that detects and binds selectively to the charged phosphates of activated receptors (16). The arrestin domains then act as multifunctional scaffolds that cannot only quench receptor signals by recruiting endocytotic machinery and ubiquitin ligases, but also start new signal cascades (15). Recently, arrestin-β2 has also been shown to play a key role in metabolism as a controller of insulin receptor signaling that is deficient in diabetes (17).In addition to the classical visual/β-arrestins, a large number of arrestins more closely related to Txnip are present throughout multicellular evolution. These proteins have been termed the “α-arrestins,” as they are of more ancient origin than the visual/β family (14). Although no structures are known of the α-arrestins to date, they appear highly likely to share the overall fold: two β-sheet sandwich arrestin domains connected by a short linker sequence (14, 18). Confidence in this prediction has been enhanced by the surprising finding that the vps26 family of proteins, even more distantly related to the classical arrestins than Txnip, also share the arrestin fold (19). The vps26 proteins are a component of the retromer complex that controls retrograde transport of recycling endosomes to the trans-Golgi network. This functional overlap with visual/β-arrestin regulation of endocytosis suggests that control of endosome formation and transport may be a conserved function of the arrestin superfamily fold.The functions of the mammalian α-arrestins remain unclear. Humans have six α-arrestins: Txnip and five other proteins, which have been assigned the names Arrdc1–5 (arrestin domain-containing 1–5) (13). Very little is known about these other α-arrestins; thioredoxin binding is not conserved beyond Txnip (13, 20). More is known in yeast: recent reports suggest that α-arrestins function in regulation of endocytosis and protein ubiquitination through PXXY motifs in their C-terminal tails (21–25). However, as all the vertebrate α-arrestins have diverged from the ancestral α-arrestins (14), their structure-function relationships may differ from yeast α-arrestins.Given that other α-arrestins are not thioredoxin-binding proteins, we hypothesized that Txnip metabolic functions may be conserved in mammalian α-arrestins and independent of its interaction with thioredoxin. Overexpression of Txnip in vitro can decrease levels of available thioredoxin and increase levels of reactive oxygen species (1, 3, 26). However, in vivo studies of two different Txnip-deficient mouse models found no change in available thioredoxin levels (8, 27). Txnip reportedly binds to other proteins including Jab1 (28) and Dnajb5 (29), but it is not clear to what extent these interactions are themselves independent of a Txnip-thioredoxin complex (30).Using overexpression of a mutant Txnip that does not bind thioredoxin, we show here that a major metabolic function of Txnip, its inhibition of glucose uptake, does not require interaction with thioredoxin. Instead, we show that inhibition of glucose uptake is a conserved function of another human α-arrestin, Arrdc4. Studies of Txnip mutants and chimeric α-arrestins suggest that the metabolic functions of Txnip and Arrdc4 are intrinsic to the arrestin domains.