Requirement for the Phospho-H2AX Binding Module of Crb2 in Double-Strand Break Targeting and Checkpoint Activation

Activation of DNA damage checkpoints requires the rapid accumulation of numerous factors to sites of genomic lesions, and deciphering the mechanisms of this targeting is central to our understanding of DNA damage response. Histone modification has recently emerged as a critical element for the correct localization of damage response proteins, and one key player in this context is the fission yeast checkpoint mediator Crb2. Accumulation of Crb2 at ionizing irradiation-induced double-strand breaks (DSBs) requires two distinct histone marks, dimethylated H4 lysine 20 (H4K20me2) and phosphorylated H2AX (pH2AX). A tandem tudor motif in Crb2 directly binds H4K20me2, and this interaction is required for DSB targeting and checkpoint activation. Similarly, pH2AX is required for Crb2 localization to DSBs and checkpoint control. Crb2 can directly bind pH2AX through a pair of C-terminal BRCT repeats, but the functional significance of this binding has been unclear. Here we demonstrate that loss of its pH2AX-binding activity severely impairs the ability of Crb2 to accumulate at ionizing irradiation-induced DSBs, compromises checkpoint signaling, and disrupts checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest. These impairments are similar to that reported for abolition of pH2AX or mutation of the H4K20me2-binding tudor motif of Crb2. Intriguingly, a combined ablation of its two histone modification binding modules yields a strikingly additive reduction in Crb2 activity. These observations argue that binding of the Crb2 BRCT repeats to pH2AX is critical for checkpoint activity and provide new insight into the mechanisms of chromatin-mediated genome stability.DNA damage response is an essential cellular guard that protects the genetic material from a constant barrage of genotoxic agents. To ensure their survival after genomic insult, cells orchestrate a signaling cascade that leads to checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest and the repair of damaged DNA (16, 35). A failure in this process can have catastrophic cellular consequences leading to the development of numerous disorders such as cancer (18, 30, 32). Because of its intimate connection with human health, deciphering the molecular mechanisms of DNA damage response is of high interest (16, 20).Recently, histone posttranslational modification has emerged as one element that is critical for ensuring a faithful response to genomic challenge (7, 31). An octamer of the four core histones, H3, H4, H2A, and H2B, forms the core protein component of chromatin, and cells possess a considerable number of enzymes that target histones for posttranslation modification (21). These marks can impinge upon many aspects of DNA biology by acting to directly alter chromatin structure or by serving as a binding scaffold for the recruitment of regulatory factors (24).In the context of DNA damage response, one factor that is intimately linked with histone modification is the fission yeast DNA damage checkpoint protein Crb2. After genomic insult, DNA damage checkpoints function to halt cell cycle progression, ensuring sufficient time for lesion repair (16, 35). In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, regulating the transition from G₂ to mitosis (G₂/M) represents the major DNA damage checkpoint and Crb2 is essential for this activity (4, 34). Crb2 is a member of a family of checkpoint regulators that have been termed mediators because they are thought to transmit the checkpoint signal from damage-sensing ATM/ATR-related kinases to effector kinases, such as Chk1, that trigger cell cycle arrest (11, 25). Crb2 is closely related to budding yeast Rad9 and mammalian p53 binding protein 53BP1, which all share two distinct domains, a tandem tudor motif and a pair of C-terminal BRCT repeats (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) (11, 25). Besides 53BP1, Crb2 also shares some functional similarities with other mammalian BRCT-containing checkpoint regulators, such as MDC1 and BRCA1 (11, 25). In response to ionizing irradiation (IR), the rapid accumulation of Crb2 and other checkpoint proteins can be readily visualized as nuclear foci that mark sites of double-strand breaks (DSBs) (9, 25). Understanding the mechanisms that govern this targeting has been an area of intense interest, and for Crb2 this accumulation requires two distinct histone marks: dimethylation of histone H4 lysine 20 (H4K20me2) and phosphorylated H2AX (pH2AX) (27, 36).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Crb2 pH2AX-binding mutations. (A) Top, schematic representation of Crb2 (not drawn to scale) with relevant mutations indicated. Bottom, protein sequence alignment of a portion of the BRCT phospho-binding motifs from Schizosaccharomyces pombe (sp) Crb2, human (h) 53BP1, human MDC1, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (sc) Rad9. Identical residues are shaded black; similar residues are shaded gray. *, Crb2 phospho-binding residues. (B) The Crb2 BRCT domains specifically interact with pH2AX. Peptide pulldowns were performed as described in the text with C-terminal fission yeast H2A.1 peptides either unmodified or phosphorylated at Ser129 (see − or + pH2AX) and increasing amounts of the indicated recombinant Crb2 BRCT domain fragments (∼0.1 and 0.3 μM). After binding and washing, SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining were used to visualize peptide-bound protein. A fraction of the total protein used for binding was also visualized (Input).Mono-, di-, and trimethyl H4K20 are conserved chromatin marks that are readily detectable in fission yeast and mammalian cells (29, 36). In fission yeast, the Kmt5 methylase catalyzes all three H4K20 methyl modifications and its inactivation, or mutation of its H4K20 substrate, severely diminishes Crb2 accumulation at DSBs and compromises checkpoint activity (10, 36). Note that as outlined by the unified nomenclature for the naming of histone lysine methyltransferases (2), the fission yeast H4K20 methylase previously known as Set9 (36) is now termed Kmt5. The requirement for H4K20 methylation is mediated by the tandem tudor domains of Crb2 that preferentially bind H4 tail peptides dimethylated at lysine 20 (3, 14). Tudor motif mutations impair Crb2 DSB targeting and genome integrity in a manner analogous to loss of Kmt5 activity, and dimethylation of H4K20, but not trimethylation, is required for Crb2 activity (10, 14, 42). The tudor domain of 53BP1 can also directly bind H4K20me2, and this recognition event is required for its accumulation at IR-induced DSBs (3, 23, 45).After DNA damage, serine 139 phosphorylation in the mammalian H2A variant H2AX, or a homologous site in canonical yeast H2A, specifically marks sites of genomic lesions (7, 12). The fission yeast genome encodes two H2A proteins, H2A.1 and H2A.2, which differ slightly in their primary amino acid sequence. Phosphorylation of S129 in H2A.1 and S128 in H2A.2 is collectively referred to as phosphorylated H2AX (pH2AX). The ATM/ATR family of PI3-like kinases that includes the fission yeast Rad3 and Tel1 enzymes catalyzes pH2AX (37). H2AX phosphorylation has a critical role in controlling both DNA repair and checkpoint activation in a variety of organisms from yeast to humans (7, 12). Central to its function is the ability of the pH2AX mark to coordinate the recruitment of a number of proteins to genomic lesions, and several factors can directly bind the modification (40). Serine-to-alanine substitutions at the H2AX phosphorylation site in fission yeast H2A (h2ax⁻) severely reduce Crb2 accumulation at IR-induced DSBs and compromise the ability of cells to maintain checkpoint cell cycle arrest in a manner very similar to loss of H4K20 methylation (10, 27).The mechanism underlying the control of Crb2 DSB targeting and checkpoint activation by pH2AX is not understood. Because BRCT domains are known phospho-binding motifs (13), the initial demonstration that pH2AX is required for Crb2 function suggested that direct binding to the modification by Crb2 is critical for checkpoint activity (27). Supporting this idea, it has been demonstrated that the Crb2 BRCT repeats directly and specifically bind pH2AX peptides (22). Structural and biochemical studies have also identified a conserved pH2AX-binding motif in the BRCT repeats of Crb2, budding yeast Rad9, and human MDC1 and 53BP1 (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) (15, 22, 39). As would be expected, mutation of Crb2''s critical phospho-binding motif impairs cell survival after DNA damage (22). Unexpectedly though, loss of its pH2AX-binding activity did not significantly affect the ability of Crb2 to localize to IR-induced DSBs (22). Rather, mutation of the Crb2 pH2AX-binding motif altered the kinetics of Rad22 accumulation at DSBs and triggered a prolonged checkpoint arrest after IR exposure (22). From these observations it was suggested that binding of the Crb2 BRCT repeats to pH2AX is critical for aspects of DNA repair but is not central to Crb2 targeting and checkpoint activity (22).The apparent dispensability of its pH2AX-binding motif in controlling Crb2 localization to IR-induced DSBs (22) was a surprising observation because of the established requirement for the pH2AX modification (10, 27). The extended checkpoint delay seen in Crb2 pH2AX-binding mutants (22) was also unexpected because h2ax⁻ cells cannot maintain checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest (10, 27). The prolonged checkpoint arrest was also surprising because a defect in IR-induced Chk1 phosphorylation was observed in the same Crb2 pH2AX-binding mutants (22). For these reasons we sought to reevaluate the requirement for the pH2AX-binding module of Crb2 in controlling DNA damage checkpoint activity. We demonstrate that the critical phospho-coordinating residue of Crb2 is required for binding to pH2AX peptides, Crb2 accumulation at IR-induced DSBs, cell survival after DNA damage, and maintenance of checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest. The observed impairments are similar to that reported for abolishment of pH2AX or mutation of the H4K20me2 binding tudor motif of Crb2. Strikingly, a combined ablation of the two modification binding modules of Crb2 produces an additive impairment in checkpoint dysfunction and genome integrity. These results argue that recognition of pH2AX by its BRCT repeats is critical for Crb2 accumulation at genomic lesions and its subsequent checkpoint activity. These observations also corroborate the independent findings of Sofueva et al. (38), who have observed a similar requirement for Crb2 binding to pH2AX in controlling DSB targeting and checkpoint activity.     

Cell Cycle-Dependent Role of MRN at Dysfunctional Telomeres: ATM Signaling-Dependent Induction of Nonhomologous End Joining (NHEJ) in G1 and Resection-Mediated Inhibition of NHEJ in G2

Here, we address the role of the MRN (Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1) complex in the response to telomeres rendered dysfunctional by deletion of the shelterin component TRF2. Using conditional NBS1/TRF2 double-knockout MEFs, we show that MRN is required for ATM signaling in response to telomere dysfunction. This establishes that MRN is the only sensor for the ATM kinase and suggests that TRF2 might block ATM signaling by interfering with MRN binding to the telomere terminus, possibly by sequestering the telomere end in the t-loop structure. We also examined the role of the MRN/ATM pathway in nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) of damaged telomeres. NBS1 deficiency abrogated the telomere fusions that occur in G₁, consistent with the requirement for ATM and its target 53BP1 in this setting. Interestingly, NBS1 and ATM, but not H2AX, repressed NHEJ at dysfunctional telomeres in G₂, specifically at telomeres generated by leading-strand DNA synthesis. Leading-strand telomere ends were not prone to fuse in the absence of either TRF2 or MRN/ATM, indicating redundancy in their protection. We propose that MRN represses NHEJ by promoting the generation of a 3′ overhang after completion of leading-strand DNA synthesis. TRF2 may ensure overhang formation by recruiting MRN (and other nucleases) to newly generated telomere ends. The activation of the MRN/ATM pathway by the dysfunctional telomeres is proposed to induce resection that protects the leading-strand ends from NHEJ when TRF2 is absent. Thus, the role of MRN at dysfunctional telomeres is multifaceted, involving both repression of NHEJ in G₂ through end resection and induction of NHEJ in G₁ through ATM-dependent signaling.Mammalian telomeres solve the end protection problem through their association with shelterin. The shelterin factor TRF2 (telomere repeat-binding factor 2) protects chromosome ends from inappropriate DNA repair events that threaten the integrity of the genome (reviewed in reference 32). When TRF2 is removed by Cre-mediated deletion from conditional knockout mouse embryo fibroblasts (TRF2^F/− MEFs), telomeres activate the ATM kinase pathway and are processed by the canonical nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway to generate chromosome end-to-end fusions (10, 11).The repair of telomeres in TRF2-deficient cells is readily monitored in metaphase spreads. Over the course of four or five cell divisions, the majority of chromosome ends become fused, resulting in metaphase spreads displaying the typical pattern of long trains of joined chromosomes (10). The reproducible pace and the efficiency of telomere NHEJ have allowed the study of factors involved in its execution and regulation. In addition to depending on the NHEJ factors Ku70 and DNA ligase IV (10, 11), telomere fusions are facilitated by the ATM kinase (26). This aspect of telomere NHEJ is mediated through the ATM kinase target 53BP1. 53BP1 accumulates at telomeres in TRF2-depleted cells and stimulates chromatin mobility, thereby promoting the juxtaposition of distantly positioned chromosome ends prior to their fusion (18). Telomere NHEJ is also accelerated by the ATM phosphorylation target MDC1, which is required for the prolonged association of 53BP1 at sites of DNA damage (19).Although loss of TRF2 leads to telomere deprotection at all stages of the cell cycle, NHEJ of uncapped telomeres takes place primarily before their replication in G₁ (25). Postreplicative (G₂) telomere fusions can occur at a low frequency upon TRF2 deletion, but only when cyclin-dependent kinase activity is inhibited with roscovitine (25). The target of Cdk1 in this setting is not known.Here, we dissect the role of the MRN (Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1) complex and H2AX at telomeres rendered dysfunctional through deletion of TRF2. The highly conserved MRN complex has been proposed to function as the double-stranded break (DSB) sensor in the ATM pathway (reviewed in references 34 and 35). In support of this model, Mre11 interacts directly with DNA ends via two carboxy-terminal DNA binding domains (13, 14); the recruitment of MRN to sites of damage is independent of ATM signaling, as it occurs in the presence of the phosphoinositide-3-kinase-related protein kinase inhibitor caffeine (29, 44); in vitro analysis has demonstrated that MRN is required for activation of ATM by linear DNAs (27); a mutant form of Rad50 (Rad50S) can induce ATM signaling in the absence of DNA damage (31); and phosphorylation of ATM targets in response to ionizing radiation is completely abrogated upon deletion of NBS1 from MEFs (17). These data and the striking similarities between syndromes caused by mutations in ATM, Nbs1, and Mre11 (ataxia telangiectasia, Nijmegen breakage syndrome, and ataxia telangiectasia-like disease, respectively) are consistent with a sensor function for MRN.MRN has also been implicated in several aspects of DNA repair. Potentially relevant to DNA repair events, Mre11 dimers can bridge and align the two DNA ends in vitro (49) and Rad50 may promote long-range tethering of sister chromatids (24, 50). In addition, a binding partner of the MRN complex, CtIP, has been implicated in end resection of DNA ends during homology-directed repair (39, 45). The role of MRN in NHEJ has been much less clear. MRX, the yeast orthologue of MRN, functions during NHEJ in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (28, 30). In mammalian cells, MRN is not recruited to I-SceI-induced DSBs in G₁, whereas Ku70 is, and MRN does not appear to be required for NHEJ-mediated repair of these DSBs (38, 54). On the other hand, MRN promotes class switch recombination (37) and has been implicated in accurate NHEJ repair during V(D)J recombination (22).The involvement of MRN in ATM signaling and DNA repair pathways has been intriguing from the perspective of telomere biology. While several of the attributes of MRN might be considered a threat to telomere integrity, MRN is known to associate with mammalian telomeres, most likely through an interaction with the TRF2 complex (48, 51, 57). MRN has been implicated in the generation of the telomeric overhang (12), the telomerase pathway (36, 52), the ALT pathway (55), and the protection of telomeres from stochastic deletion events (1). It has also been speculated that MRN may contribute to formation of the t-loop structure (16). t-loops, the lariats formed through the strand invasion of the telomere terminus into the duplex telomeric DNA (21), are thought to contribute to telomere protection by effectively shielding the chromosome end from DNA damage response factors that interact with DNA ends, including nucleases, and the Ku heterodimer (15).H2AX has been studied extensively in the context of chromosome-internal DSBs. When a DSB is formed, ATM acts near the lesion to phosphorylate a conserved carboxy-terminal serine of H2AX, a histone variant present throughout the genome (7). Phosphorylated H2AX (referred to as γ-H2AX) promotes the spreading of DNA damage factors over several megabases along the damaged chromatin and mediates the amplification of the DNA damage signal (43). The signal amplification is accomplished through a sequence of phospho-specific interactions among γ-H2AX, MDC1, NBS1, RNF8, and RNF168, which results in the additional binding of ATM and additional phosphorylation of H2AX in adjacent chromatin (reviewed in reference 33). The formation of these large domains of altered chromatin, referred to as irradiation-induced foci at DSBs and telomere dysfunction-induced foci (TIFs) at dysfunctional telomeres (44), promotes the binding of several factors implicated in DNA repair, including the BRCA1 A complex and 53BP1 (33).In agreement with a role for H2AX in DNA repair, H2AX-deficient cells exhibit elevated levels of irradiation-induced chromosome abnormalities (5, 9). In addition, H2AX-null B cells are prone to chromosome breaks and translocations in the immunoglobulin locus, indicative of impaired class switch recombination, a process that involves the repair of DSBs through the NHEJ pathway (9, 20). Since H2AX is dispensable for the activation of irradiation-induced checkpoints (8), these data argue that H2AX contributes directly to DNA repair. However, a different set of studies has concluded that H2AX is not required for NHEJ during V(D)J recombination (5, 9) but that it plays a role in homology-directed repair (53). In this study, we have further queried the contribution of H2AX to NHEJ in the context of dysfunctional telomeres.Our aim was to dissect the contribution of MRN and H2AX to DNA damage signaling and NHEJ-mediated repair in response to telomere dysfunction elicited by deletion of TRF2. Importantly, since ATM is the only kinase activated in this setting, deletion of TRF2 can illuminate the specific contribution of these factors in the absence of the confounding effects of ATR signaling (26). This approach revealed a dual role for MRN at telomeres, involving both its function as a sensor in the ATM pathway and its ability to protect telomeres from NHEJ under certain circumstances.     

Analysis of the Viral Elements Required in the Nuclear Import of HIV-1 DNA

HIV-1 possesses an exquisite ability to infect cells independently from their cycling status by undergoing an active phase of nuclear import through the nuclear pore. This property has been ascribed to the presence of karyophilic elements present in viral nucleoprotein complexes, such as the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a cis-acting structure present in the newly synthesized DNA, the DNA flap. However, their role in nuclear import remains controversial at best. In the present study, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the role of these elements in nuclear import in a comparison between several primary cell types, including stimulated lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. We show that despite the fact that none of these elements is absolutely required for nuclear import, disruption of the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS) clearly affects the kinetics of viral DNA entry into the nucleus. This effect is independent of the cell cycle status of the target cells and is observed in cycling as well as in nondividing primary cells, suggesting that nuclear import of viral DNA may occur similarly under both conditions. Nonetheless, this study indicates that other components are utilized along with the cPPT-CTS for an efficient entry of viral DNA into the nucleus.Lentiviruses display an exquisite ability to infect dividing and nondividing cells alike that is unequalled among Retroviridae. This property is thought to be due to the particular behavior or composition of the viral nucleoprotein complexes (NPCs) that are liberated into the cytoplasm of target cells upon virus-to-cell membrane fusion and that allow lentiviruses to traverse an intact nuclear membrane (17, 28, 29, 39, 52, 55, 67, 79). In the case of the human immunodeficiency type I virus (HIV-1), several studies over the years identified viral components of such structures with intrinsic karyophilic properties and thus perfect candidates for mediation of the passage of viral DNA (vDNA) through the nuclear pore: the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a three-stranded DNA flap, a structure present in neo-synthesized viral DNA, specified by the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS). It is clear that these elements may mediate nuclear import directly or via the recruitment of the host''s proteins, and indeed, several cellular proteins have been found to influence HIV-1 infection during nuclear import, like the karyopherin α2 Rch1 (38); importin 7 (3, 30, 93); the transportin SR-2 (13, 20); or the nucleoporins Nup98 (27), Nup358/RANBP2, and Nup153 (13, 56).More recently, the capsid protein (CA), the main structural component of viral nucleoprotein complexes at least upon their cytoplasmic entry, has also been suggested to be involved in nuclear import or in postnuclear entry steps (14, 25, 74, 90, 92). Whether this is due to a role for CA in the shaping of viral nucleoprotein complexes or to a direct interaction between CA and proteins involved in nuclear import remains at present unknown.Despite a large number of reports, no single viral or cellular element has been described as absolutely necessary or sufficient to mediate lentiviral nuclear import, and important controversies as to the experimental evidences linking these elements to this step exist. For example, MA was among the first viral protein of HIV-1 described to be involved in nuclear import, and 2 transferable nuclear localization signals (NLSs) have been described to occur at its N and C termini (40). However, despite the fact that early studies indicated that the mutation of these NLSs perturbed HIV-1 nuclear import and infection specifically in nondividing cells, such as macrophages (86), these findings failed to be confirmed in more-recent studies (23, 33, 34, 57, 65, 75).Similarly, Vpr has been implicated by several studies of the nuclear import of HIV-1 DNA (1, 10, 21, 43, 45, 47, 64, 69, 72, 73, 85). Vpr does not possess classical NLSs, yet it displays a transferable nucleophilic activity when fused to heterologous proteins (49-51, 53, 77, 81) and has been shown to line onto the nuclear envelope (32, 36, 47, 51, 58), where it can truly facilitate the passage of the viral genome into the nucleus. However, the role of Vpr in this step remains controversial, as in some instances Vpr is not even required for viral replication in nondividing cells (1, 59).Conflicting results concerning the role of IN during HIV-1 nuclear import also exist. Indeed, several transferable NLSs have been described to occur in the catalytic core and the C-terminal DNA binding domains of IN, but for some of these, initial reports of nuclear entry defects (2, 9, 22, 46, 71) were later shown to result from defects at steps other than nuclear import (60, 62, 70, 83). These reports do not exclude a role for the remaining NLSs in IN during nuclear import, and they do not exclude the possibility that IN may mediate this step by associating with components of the cellular nuclear import machinery, such as importin alpha and beta (41), importin 7 (3, 30, 93, 98), and, more recently, transportin-SR2 (20).The central DNA flap, a structure present in lentiviruses and in at least 1 yeast retroelement (44), but not in other orthoretroviruses, has also been involved in the nuclear import of viral DNA (4, 6, 7, 31, 78, 84, 95, 96), and more recently, it has been proposed to provide a signal for viral nucleoprotein complexes uncoating in the proximity of the nuclear pore, with the consequence of providing a signal for import (8). However, various studies showed an absence or weakness of nuclear entry defects in viruses devoid of the DNA flap (24, 26, 44, 61).Overall, the importance of viral factors in HIV-1 nuclear import is still unclear. The discrepancies concerning the role of MA, IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS in HIV-1 nuclear import could in part be explained by their possible redundancy. To date, only one comprehensive study analyzed the role of these four viral potentially karyophilic elements together (91). This study showed that an HIV-1 chimera where these elements were either deleted or replaced by their murine leukemia virus (MLV) counterparts was, in spite of an important infectivity defect, still able to infect cycling and cell cycle-arrested cell lines to similar efficiencies. If this result indicated that the examined viral elements of HIV-1 were dispensable for the cell cycle independence of HIV, as infections proceeded equally in cycling and arrested cells, they did not prove that they were not required in nuclear import, because chimeras displayed a severe infectivity defect that precluded their comparison with the wild type (WT).Nuclear import and cell cycle independence may not be as simply linked as previously thought. On the one hand, there has been no formal demonstration that the passage through the nuclear pore, and thus nuclear import, is restricted to nondividing cells, and for what we know, this passage may be an obligatory step in HIV infection in all cells, irrespective of their cycling status. In support of this possibility, certain mutations in viral elements of HIV affect nuclear import in dividing as well as in nondividing cells (4, 6, 7, 31, 84, 95). On the other hand, cell cycle-independent infection may be a complex phenomenon that is made possible not only by the ability of viral DNA to traverse the nuclear membrane but also by its ability to cope with pre- and postnuclear entry events, as suggested by the phenotypes of certain CA mutants (74, 92).Given that the cellular environment plays an important role during the early steps of viral infection, we chose to analyze the role of the four karyophilic viral elements of HIV-1 during infection either alone or combined in a wide comparison between cells highly susceptible to infection and more-restrictive primary cell targets of HIV-1 in vivo, such as primary blood lymphocytes (PBLs), monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM), and dendritic cells (DCs).In this study, we show that an HIV-1-derived virus in which the 2 NLSs of MA are mutated and the IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS elements are removed displays no detectable nuclear import defect in HeLa cells independently of their cycling status. However, this mutant virus is partially impaired for nuclear entry in primary cells and more specifically in DCs and PBLs. We found that this partial defect is specified by the cPPT-CTS, while the 3 remaining elements seem to play no role in nuclear import. Thus, our study indicates that the central DNA flap specifies the most important role among the viral elements involved thus far in nuclear import. However, it also clearly indicates that the role played by the central DNA flap is not absolute and that its importance varies depending on the cell type, independently from the dividing status of the cell.     

Adeno-Associated Virus Replication Induces a DNA Damage Response Coordinated by DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase

The parvovirus adeno-associated virus (AAV) contains a small single-stranded DNA genome with inverted terminal repeats that form hairpin structures. In order to propagate, AAV relies on the cellular replication machinery together with functions supplied by coinfecting helper viruses such as adenovirus (Ad). Here, we examined the host cell response to AAV replication in the context of Ad or Ad helper proteins. We show that AAV and Ad coinfection activates a DNA damage response (DDR) that is distinct from that seen during Ad or AAV infection alone. The DDR was also triggered when AAV replicated in the presence of minimal Ad helper proteins. We detected autophosphorylation of the kinases ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) and signaling to downstream targets SMC1, Chk1, Chk2, H2AX, and XRCC4 and multiple sites on RPA32. The Mre11 complex was not required for activation of the DDR to AAV infection. Additionally, we found that DNA-PKcs was the primary mediator of damage signaling in response to AAV replication. Immunofluorescence revealed that some activated damage proteins were found in a pan-nuclear pattern (phosphorylated ATM, SMC1, and H2AX), while others such as DNA-PK components (DNA-PKcs, Ku70, and Ku86) and RPA32 accumulated at AAV replication centers. Although expression of the large viral Rep proteins contributed to some damage signaling, we observed that the full response required replication of the AAV genome. Our results demonstrate that AAV replication in the presence of Ad helper functions elicits a unique damage response controlled by DNA-PK.Replication of viral genomes produces a large amount of extrachromosomal DNA that may be recognized by the cellular DNA damage machinery. This is often accompanied by activation of DNA damage response (DDR) signaling pathways and recruitment of cellular repair proteins to sites of viral replication. Viruses therefore provide good model systems to study the recognition and response to DNA damage (reviewed in reference 48). The Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (MRN) complex functions as a sensor of chromosomal DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and is involved in activation of damage signaling (reviewed in reference 41). The MRN complex also localizes to DNA DSBs and is found at viral replication compartments during infection with a number of DNA viruses (6, 40, 47, 70, 75, 77, 87, 93). The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-like kinases (PIKKs) ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ATM and Rad3-related kinase (ATR), and the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs) are involved in the signal transduction cascades activated by DNA damage (reviewed in references 43, 51, and 71). These kinases respond to distinct types of damage and regulate DSB repair during different phases of the cell cycle (5), either through nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination pathways (reviewed in references 63, 81, and 86). The DNA-PK holoenzyme is composed of DNA-PKcs and two regulatory subunits, the Ku70 and Ku86 heterodimer. DNA-PK functions with XRCC4/DNA ligase IV to repair breaks during NHEJ, and works with Artemis to process DNA hairpin structures during VDJ recombination and during a subset of DNA DSB events (46, 50, 86). While the kinase activity of DNA-PKcs leads to phosphorylation of a large number of substrates in vitro as well as autophosphorylation of specific residues (reviewed in references 16 and 85), it is currently unclear how DNA-PKcs contributes to signaling in cells upon different types of damage.The adeno-associated virus (AAV) genome consists of a molecule of single-stranded DNA with inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) at both ends that form double-hairpin structures due to their palindromic sequences (reviewed in reference 52). The ITRs are important for replication and packaging of the viral genome and for integration into the host genome. Four viral Rep proteins (Rep78, Rep68, Rep52, and Rep40) are also required for replication and packaging of the AAV genome into virions assembled from the Cap proteins. Although the Rep and Cap genes are replaced in recombinant AAV vectors (rAAV) that retain only the ITRs flanking the gene of interest, these vectors can be replicated by providing Rep in trans (reviewed in reference 7). Productive AAV infection requires helper functions supplied by adenovirus (Ad) or other viruses such as herpes simplex virus (HSV) (reviewed in reference 27), together with components of the host cell DNA replication machinery (54, 55, 58). In the presence of helper viruses or minimal helper proteins from Ad or HSV, AAV replicates in the nucleus at centers where the viral DNA and Rep proteins accumulate (35, 76, 84, 89). Cellular and viral proteins involved in AAV replication, including replication protein A (RPA), Ad DNA-binding protein (DBP), and HSV ICP8, localize with Rep proteins at these viral centers (29, 33, 76).A number of published reports suggest associations between AAV and the cellular DNA damage machinery. For example, transduction by rAAV vectors is increased by genotoxic agents and DNA damaging treatments (1, 62, 91) although the mechanisms involved remain unclear. Additionally, the ATM kinase negatively regulates rAAV transduction (64, 92), and we have shown that the MRN complex poses a barrier to both rAAV transduction and wild-type AAV replication (11, 67). UV-inactivated AAV particles also appear to activate a DDR involving ATM and ATR kinases that perturbs cell cycle progression (39, 60, 88). It has been suggested that this response is provoked by the AAV ITRs (60) and that UV-treated particles mimic stalled replication forks in infected cells (39). In addition to AAV genome components, the viral Rep proteins have been observed to exhibit cytotoxicity and induce S-phase arrest (3, 65).The role of cellular repair proteins in AAV genome processing has also been explored by examining the molecular fate of rAAV vectors, which are converted into circular and concatemeric forms that persist episomally (18, 19, 66). Proteins shown to regulate circularization in cell culture include ATM and the MRN complex (14, 64), while in vivo experiments using mouse models have implicated ATM and DNA-PK in this process (14, 20, 72). Additionally, DNA-PKcs and Artemis have recently been shown to cleave the ITR hairpins of rAAV vectors in vivo in a tissue-dependent manner (36). Despite these studies, it is not clear how damage response factors function together and how they impact AAV transduction and replication in human cells.In this study we examined the cellular response to AAV replication in the context of Ad infection or helper proteins. We show that coinfection with AAV and Ad activates a DDR that is distinct from that seen during infection with Ad alone. The ATM and DNA-PKcs damage kinases are activated and signal to downstream substrates, but the response does not require the MRN complex and is primarily mediated by DNA-PKcs. Although expression of the large Rep proteins induced some DDR events, full signaling appeared to require AAV replication and was accompanied by accumulation of DNA-PK at viral replication compartments. Our results demonstrate that AAV replication induces a unique DNA damage signal transduction response and provides a model system for studying DNA-PK.     

Inactivation and Disassembly of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex during Human Cytomegalovirus Infection Is Associated with Degradation of the APC5 and APC4 Subunits and Does Not Require UL97-Mediated Phosphorylation of Cdh1

Infection of quiescent cells by human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) elicits severe cell cycle deregulation, resulting in a G₁/S arrest, which can be partly attributed to the inactivation of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC). As we previously reported, the premature phosphorylation of its coactivator Cdh1 and/or the dissociation of the core complex can account for the inactivation. We have expanded on these results and further delineated the key components required for disabling the APC during HCMV infection. The viral protein kinase UL97 was hypothesized to phosphorylate Cdh1, and consistent with this, phosphatase assays utilizing a virus with a UL97 deletion mutation (ΔUL97 virus) indicated that Cdh1 is hypophosphorylated at early times in the infection. Mass spectrometry analysis demonstrated that UL97 can phosphorylate Cdh1 in vitro, and the majority of the sites identified correlated with previously characterized cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) consensus sites. Analysis of the APC core complex during ΔUL97 virus infection showed APC dissociation occurring at the same time as during infection with wild-type virus, suggesting that the UL97-mediated phosphorylation of Cdh1 is not required for this to occur. Further investigation of the APC subunits showed a proteasome-dependent loss of the APC5 and APC4 subunits that was temporally associated with the disassembly of the APC. Immediate early viral gene expression was not sufficient for the degradation of APC4 and APC5, indicating that a viral early gene product(s), possibly in association with a de novo-synthesized cellular protein(s), is involved.Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), a highly prevalent β-herpesvirus, can cause serious birth defects and disease in immunocompromised individuals, and it may be associated with cancer and cardiovascular disease (53). Viral gene expression is temporally regulated and is dependent on many cellular factors for a productive infection. Immediate early (IE) genes are expressed by 2 h postinfection (p.i.) and transactivate the early genes required for viral DNA replication. The expression of the late genes, which encode proteins involved in virion maturation and egress, is dependent on viral DNA replication.The virus has adopted different strategies for altering the cellular environment to make it more conducive to productive infection, including the stimulation of host cell DNA replication pathways, cell cycle deregulation and arrest, immune evasion, and inhibition of apoptosis (53). Although HCMV encodes its own DNA polymerase, it is dependent on other cellular resources for DNA replication. Infection of quiescent cells induces passage toward S phase such that the host cell is stimulated to generate proteins and DNA precursors necessary for genome replication; however, entry into S phase and cellular DNA replication are subsequently blocked and the cell arrests in G₁/S (1, 10, 11, 14, 30, 45). Cellular resources are thereby presumably free to be efficiently utilized for viral replication. Cell cycle arrest by HCMV is achieved in part through the misregulation of several cell cycle proteins, including the phosphorylation and accumulation of the Rb family pocket proteins, upregulation of cyclins E and B and their associated kinase activities, inhibition of cyclin A expression, stabilization of p53, and accumulation of Cdc6 and geminin, which inhibits licensing of the cellular origins of DNA replication (8, 17, 30, 49, 54, 65). Some of these cell cycle defects can be attributed to a deregulation of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) (8, 72, 79, 80), an E3 ubiquitin ligase that is responsible for the timely degradation of cell cycle proteins and mitotic cyclins to promote cycle progression from mitosis through G₁ to S phase (58, 74). As the APC also appears to be a common target among other viruses, including the chicken anemia virus, adenoviruses, and poxviruses (23, 36, 52, 70), understanding the mechanisms leading to its inactivation during viral infection has been of great interest.As we have previously reported, multiple mechanisms may be involved in disabling the APC during HCMV infection (72), which is not surprising given the complexity of its structure and regulation (for a review, see references 58 and 74). The APC is a large multisubunit complex consisting of at least 11 conserved core subunits, as well as other species-specific subunits. In metazoans, the APC2 and APC11 subunits form the catalytic core, and along with APC10, provide the platform for binding the E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Each of the APC3, APC8, APC6, and APC7 subunits contain multiple copies of the tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) motif and together make up the TPR subcomplex, which provides a platform of protein interaction surfaces for binding the coactivators (i.e., Cdh1 and Cdc20) and various substrates. These two subcomplexes are bridged by the large scaffolding subunit APC1, with the TPR subcomplex tethered to APC1 through APC4 and APC5. The binding between APC1, APC4, APC5, and APC8 is also interdependent, such that the loss of one subunit decreases the association of the other three (71).The APC is activated by either of its coactivators, Cdh1 or Cdc20, which also function in recruiting specific substrates to the APC during different phases of the cell cycle. The phosphorylation of several APC subunits at the onset of mitosis, including APC1 and the TPR subunits, by cyclin B/cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) and Plk1 allows the binding of Cdc20 and subsequent activation of the APC (APC^Cdc20) (19, 37), whereas the binding and activation of the complex by Cdh1 is inhibited through its phosphorylation by cyclin B/Cdk1 (9, 29, 38, 83). As cells pass the spindle assembly checkpoint, APC^Cdc20 ubiquitinates securin (to allow for sister chromatid separation) and cyclin B for degradation by the proteasome (42, 67). The subsequent inactivation of Cdk1 and activation of mitotic phosphatases during late anaphase relieves the inhibitory phosphorylation on Cdh1, presumably by Cdc14 (6, 38, 44), which then allows Cdh1 to bind and activate the APC (APC^Cdh1). APC^Cdh1 ubiquitinates Cdc20 and mitotic cyclins for degradation to facilitate mitotic exit and maintains their low levels, along with S-phase regulators (e.g., Cdc6, geminin, etc.), during G₁ (16, 50, 59, 63). The inactivation of APC^Cdh1 as cells enter S phase may be mediated in part through the phosphorylation of Cdh1 by cyclin A/Cdk2 (46) and Cdh1 binding to the inhibitor Emi1 (25). The inactivation of Cdh1 by phosphorylation has been shown in all organisms studied thus far (e.g., yeast, Drosophila, plants, mammals, etc.), and mutants mimicking constitutively phosphorylated Cdh1 on Cdk consensus sites can neither bind nor activate the APC in vivo or in vitro (9, 29, 38, 69, 83).During HCMV infection of fibroblasts in G₀/G₁, however, Cdh1 becomes prematurely phosphorylated in a Cdk-independent manner and no longer associates with the APC (72). This dissociation does not appear to be due to an overexpression of Emi1 (79). Cdc20 also can no longer associate with the APC (79), suggesting a defect in the APC core. We have further shown that the APC core complex disassembles during the infection, with the TPR subunits (i.e., APC3, APC7, and APC8) and APC10 localizing to the cytosol, while APC1 remains nuclear (72). Interestingly, both the phosphorylation of Cdh1 and the dissociation of the APC occur at similar times during HCMV infection. Although either of these mechanisms could render the APC inactive, it was unclear whether these processes are linked or represent independent (or redundant) pathways. The causative factor(s) in mediating these events and the question of whether such a factor(s) was of cellular or viral origin also remained unresolved.On the basis of the results of several recent studies (26, 32, 62), the viral protein kinase UL97 emerged as a likely candidate for involvement in the phosphorylation of Cdh1. Conserved among herpesviruses, UL97 functions in viral genome replication (7, 32, 81) and in nuclear egress of viral capsids (21, 39, 48). UL97 is present in the tegument of the virus particle (76) and is also expressed de novo with early kinetics (i.e., detectable by 5 h p.i. by Western blot assay), with increased expression at later times of the infection (51, 76, 77). UL97 is a serine/threonine (S/T) protein kinase (22), and recent studies have further characterized it as a Cdkl mimic, with predicted structural similarity to Cdk2 (64) and common substrates. UL97 has been shown to phosphorylate in vitro nuclear lamin A/C (21), the carboxyl-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II (5), the translation elongation factor 1δ (EF1δ) (33), and Rb (26, 62) on sites targeted by Cdks, and there is considerable evidence that UL97 phosphorylates lamin A/C, EF1δ, and Rb on these sites in infected cells as well (21, 26, 33, 62). Given that cyclin A/Cdk2 and cyclin B/Cdk1 complexes normally phosphorylate Cdh1, thus preventing its association with the APC, we hypothesized that UL97 phosphorylates Cdh1 during HCMV infection.In the present study, we provide further mechanistic details of the events and players involved in inactivating the APC during HCMV infection. Evidence that UL97 is the viral factor mediating the phosphorylation of Cdh1 was obtained. However, APC disassembly still occurred at similar times in ΔUL97 and wild-type virus infections, indicating that UL97-mediated phosphorylation of Cdh1 is not required for this event. The inactivation of the APC core complex is further attributed to the loss of the APC5 and APC4 subunits early during the infection. The degradation of these subunits is proteasome dependent and requires de novo synthesis of viral early or cellular proteins. While the primary mechanism of inactivation appears to be the dissociation of the complex and the targeted loss of APC5 and APC4, phosphorylation of Cdh1 may provide a small kinetic advantage and backup mechanism for disabling the APC.     

Protein Phosphatase 6 Interacts with the DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Catalytic Subunit and Dephosphorylates γ-H2AX

The catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs) plays a major role in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). We have previously shown that DNA-PKcs is autophosphorylated in response to ionizing radiation (IR) and that dephosphorylation by a protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A)-like protein phosphatase (PP2A, PP4, or PP6) regulates the protein kinase activity of DNA-PKcs. Here we report that DNA-PKcs interacts with the catalytic subunits of PP6 (PP6c) and PP2A (PP2Ac), as well as with the PP6 regulatory subunits PP6R1, PP6R2, and PP6R3. Consistent with a role in the DNA damage response, silencing of PP6c by small interfering RNA (siRNA) induced sensitivity to IR and delayed release from the G₂/M checkpoint. Furthermore, siRNA silencing of either PP6c or PP6R1 led to sustained phosphorylation of histone H2AX on serine 139 (γ-H2AX) after IR. In contrast, silencing of PP6c did not affect the autophosphorylation of DNA-PKcs on serine 2056 or that of the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) protein on serine 1981. We propose that a novel function of DNA-PKcs is to recruit PP6 to sites of DNA damage and that PP6 contributes to the dephosphorylation of γ-H2AX, the dissolution of IR-induced foci, and release from the G₂/M checkpoint in vivo.DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most cytotoxic form of DNA damage. In human cells there are two main pathways for the repair of DSBs, namely, nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) (reviewed in reference 26). In the initial phase of NHEJ, DSBs are detected by the Ku70/80 heterodimer, which leads to recruitment of the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) and stimulation of its serine/threonine protein kinase activity. Upon autophosphorylation, DNA-PKcs undergoes a conformational change and dissociates from the DSB (25), providing other DNA repair proteins with access to the damage site (reviewed in reference 33). Another physiological substrate of DNA-PK is a histone H2A variant, H2AX. DNA-PKcs and the related protein kinase ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated) both contribute to DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of H2AX on serine 139 to form γ-H2AX (51), which acts as a recruitment platform for MDC1, 53BP1, and other proteins involved in the DNA damage response and cell cycle checkpoint activation (7, 52).While the effects of phosphorylation on the repair process have been well documented, comparatively little is known about the role of serine/threonine phosphoprotein phosphatases (PPPs) in the DNA damage response. Within the PPP family, the catalytic subunits of PP2A (PP2Ac), PP4 (PP4c), and PP6 (PP6c) are most closely related and form a subgroup referred to as the PP2A-like protein phosphatases (reviewed in reference 40). In vitro, the PP2A-like enzymes display similar sensitivities to small-molecule inhibitors such as okadaic acid and microcystin (27, 45, 53). The specificity of PP2Ac, PP4c, and PP6c function in vivo is derived from a group of regulatory subunits that, with the exception of α4/TAP42 and TIP41, are unique to each enzyme (12, 13, 27, 45, 49). PP2Ac associates with a scaffolding A-α or A-β subunit and additional B-type subunits, while four direct binding partners and several other complex partners unique to PP4c have been characterized (12). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of PP6c, known as Sit4, interacts with three related proteins: the Sit4-associated proteins SAP155, SAP185, and SAP190, each of which contains a conserved domain known as the SAPs domain (32, 50). The SAPs domain is present in three human orthologues designated PP6R1, PP6R2, and PP6R3, which are therefore considered PP6c regulatory subunits, and each has been shown to bind independently to PP6c (48). More recently, three ankyrin repeat-containing proteins (ARS-A, ARS-B, and ARS-C) were identified as PP6R1 binding partners. One of these, ARS-A, has been shown to dock all three SAPs domain proteins (50), suggesting that, like PP2Ac, PP6c forms stable heterotrimers in vivo and that together these subunits define PP6 function.We have previously shown that inhibition of PP2A-like protein phosphatase activity by okadaic acid increases the phosphorylation status of DNA-PKcs and decreases its protein kinase activity (20), thus implicating PP2A-like phosphatases in the regulation of DNA-PK activity in vivo. More recently, both PP4 and PP2A have been shown to play roles in the DNA damage response by dephosphorylating γ-H2AX (14, 15, 28, 42). However, the potential role of PP6 in γ-H2AX dephosphorylation has not been addressed.Here we show that DNA-PKcs interacts with PP2Ac and PP6c, as well as with the PP6c regulatory subunits, PP6R1, PP6R2, and PP6R3. Depletion of PP6c by small interfering RNA (siRNA) induces sensitivity to ionizing radiation (IR) and delayed release from the G₂/M checkpoint. Furthermore, siRNA silencing of either PP6c or PP6R1 leads to sustained phosphorylation of γ-H2AX after DNA damage. Together, our studies reveal that a novel and previously unrecognized function of DNA-PKcs may be to recruit PP6 to sites of DNA damage and that PP6 regulates the phosphorylation status of γ-H2AX, the dissolution of IR-induced foci, and release from the G₂/M checkpoint.