Actin-Binding Proteins Implicated in the Formation of the Punctate Actin Foci Stimulated by the Self-Incompatibility Response in Papaver

The actin cytoskeleton is a key target for signaling networks and plays a central role in translating signals into cellular responses in eukaryotic cells. Self-incompatibility (SI) is an important mechanism responsible for preventing self-fertilization. The SI system of Papaver rhoeas pollen involves a Ca²⁺-dependent signaling network, including massive actin depolymerization as one of the earliest cellular responses, followed by the formation of large actin foci. However, no analysis of these structures, which appear to be aggregates of filamentous (F-)actin based on phalloidin staining, has been carried out to date. Here, we characterize and quantify the formation of F-actin foci in incompatible Papaver pollen tubes over time. The F-actin foci increase in size over time, and we provide evidence that their formation requires actin polymerization. Once formed, these SI-induced structures are unusually stable, being resistant to treatments with latrunculin B. Furthermore, their formation is associated with changes in the intracellular localization of two actin-binding proteins, cyclase-associated protein and actin-depolymerizing factor. Two other regulators of actin dynamics, profilin and fimbrin, do not associate with the F-actin foci. This study provides, to our knowledge, the first insights into the actin-binding proteins and mechanisms involved in the formation of these intriguing structures, which appear to be actively formed during the SI response.The ability to perceive and integrate signals into networks is essential for all eukaryotic cells. The actin cytoskeleton is a major target and integrator of signaling networks in eukaryotic cells. In plants, many extracellular stimuli lead to rapid structural changes in the actin cytoskeleton (Staiger, 2000; Hussey et al., 2006). Although many of the signaling intermediates that regulate actin dynamics are well defined in animal cells and yeast (Iden and Collard, 2008; Thomas et al., 2009), considerably less is known for plants. However, it is generally accepted that actin-binding proteins (ABPs) function as transducers of cellular stimuli into changes in cellular architecture (Hussey et al., 2006; Staiger and Blanchoin, 2006; Thomas et al., 2009). This includes three abundant monomer-binding proteins, profilin, actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF), and cyclase-associated protein (CAP), which function synergistically to stimulate actin turnover in vitro (Chaudhry et al., 2007). Bundling and cross-linking proteins, such as fimbrin, function to stabilize actin filaments into higher order structures (Kovar et al., 2000b; Thomas et al., 2009). These and other regulators of actin turnover are likely targets for signal-mediated changes in actin architecture in response to biotic and abiotic stresses.Self-incompatibility (SI) is a genetically controlled system to prevent self-fertilization in flowering plants. SI is controlled by a multiallelic S-locus; S-specific pollen rejection results from the interaction of pollen S- and pistil S-determinants that have matching alleles (Franklin-Tong, 2008). In Papaver rhoeas, the pistil S-determinants (previously called S proteins, recently renamed PrsS; Foote et al., 1994; Wheeler et al., 2009) act as ligands, interacting with the pollen S-determinant PrpS (Wheeler et al., 2009), triggering increases in calcium influx and increases in cytosol-free calcium in incompatible pollen (Franklin-Tong et al., 1993, 1997, 2002). The Ca²⁺-mediated signaling network results in rapid inhibition of incompatible pollen tube growth and triggers programmed cell death (PCD) involving several caspase-like activities (Thomas and Franklin-Tong, 2004; Bosch and Franklin-Tong, 2007).The SI response and the Ca²⁺-signaling pathway in Papaver stimulate rapid reorganization and massive depolymerization of actin filaments in incompatible pollen tubes (Geitmann et al., 2000; Snowman et al., 2002). Moreover, it has been demonstrated that changes in actin dynamics are necessary and sufficient for PCD initiation (Thomas et al., 2006). Intriguingly, there seems to be cross talk between actin and microtubule cytoskeletons in mediating PCD in pollen (Poulter et al., 2008). Thus, there is compelling evidence for signaling to the actin cytoskeleton in mediating PCD during SI (for a recent review, see Bosch et al., 2008). SI also triggers further changes to the actin cytoskeleton. Small F-actin foci are formed, and these increase in size within the first hour after SI stimulus and remain observable for at least 3 h (Geitmann et al., 2000; Snowman et al., 2002). These aggregates contain F-actin, as they stain with rhodamine phalloidin. The formation of the small actin foci and the larger F-actin structures occurs after cessation of pollen tube growth, so they are unlikely to play a role in pollen inhibition.Punctate F-actin foci are unusual structures, and there appears to be a paucity of examples of their formation in any eukaryotic cell type. Actin patches are associated with endocytosis in normally growing yeast (Pelham and Chang, 2001; Kaksonen et al., 2003; Ayscough, 2004; Young et al., 2004), and “actin nodules” are formed during filipodia formation in platelets (Calaminus et al., 2008). Actin bodies are formed when yeast cells enter the quiescent cycle (Sagot et al., 2006), and Hirano bodies are observed in animal cells and Dictyostelium undergoing stress or in the disease state (Hirano, 1994; Maselli et al., 2002). Large star-shaped actin arrays have been observed in pollen tubes growing in vivo (Lord, 1992), but their nature and function are unknown. When we first described the SI-induced structures, we avoided the terminology of patches or bodies, as it was not known whether they were either structurally or functionally comparable to any of these previously characterized actin-based structures.Studies on the SI-mediated actin responses to date have focused on the initial phase of depolymerization, and no analysis of what is involved in the formation of the large punctate actin foci has been made. Here, we show that the formation of punctate actin foci requires actin polymerization, but once formed they are unusually stable. Moreover, we find that their formation correlates with changes in the intracellular localization of two ABPs, CAP and ADF, but not with two other key regulators of actin dynamics, profilin and fimbrin.     

Actin Reorganization Underlies Phototropin-Dependent Positioning of Nuclei in Arabidopsis Leaf Cells

In epidermal and mesophyll cells of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) leaves, nuclei become relocated in response to strong blue light. We previously reported that nuclear positions both in darkness and in strong blue light are regulated by the blue light receptor phototropin2 in mesophyll cells. Here, we investigate the involvement of phototropin and the actin cytoskeleton in nuclear positioning in epidermal cells. Analysis of geometrical parameters revealed that, in darkness, nuclei were distributed near the center of the cell, adjacent to the inner periclinal wall, independent of cell shape. Dividing the anticlinal wall into concave, convex, and intermediate regions indicated that, in strong blue light, nuclei became relocated preferably to a concave region of the anticlinal wall, nearest the center of the cell. Mutant analyses verified that light-dependent nuclear positioning was regulated by phototropin2, while dark positioning of nuclei was independent of phototropin. Nuclear movement was inhibited by an actin-depolymerizing reagent, latrunculin B, but not by a microtubule-disrupting reagent, propyzamide. Imaging actin organization by immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that thick actin bundles, periclinally arranged parallel to the longest axis of the epidermal cell, were associated with the nucleus in darkness, whereas under strong blue light, the actin bundles, especially in the vicinity of the nucleus, became arranged close to the anticlinal walls. Light-dependent changes in the actin organization were clear in phot1 mutant but not in phot2 and phot1phot2 mutants. We propose that, in Arabidopsis, blue-light-dependent nuclear positioning is regulated by phototropin2-dependent reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton.Positioning organelles is essential for cellular activities. The nucleus changes its position in a programmatic way during development and the cell cycle (Britz, 1979; Nagai, 1993; Chytilova et al., 2000). For example, before asymmetrical divisions that give rise to the formation of root hair cells or guard mother cells, the nucleus migrates to the future division plane (Britz, 1979). In elongating root hair cells of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the nucleus is maintained at a fixed distance from the apex (Ketelaar et al., 2002).While the nuclear migrations before mitosis and in root hairs are developmental, nuclear positioning is also regulated environmentally. In the fern, Adiantum capillus-veneris, nuclei in prothallial cells change their intracellular positions in response to light (Kagawa and Wada, 1993, 1995). The nuclei are located along the anticlinal walls in darkness and move toward the outer periclinal walls in weak light and to the anticlinal walls in strong light (Kagawa and Wada, 1993, 1995; Tsuboi et al., 2007). This response is called light-dependent nuclear positioning. Since the response is induced in cells that exhibit neither cell division nor expansion, it is believed to have a physiological role, distinct from the nuclear positioning associated with development.Recently, light-dependent nuclear positioning was reported in the spermatophyte Arabidopsis (Iwabuchi et al., 2007). In epidermal and mesophyll cells of dark-treated leaves, nuclei are distributed along the inner periclinal wall. Under strong light, they become located along the anticlinal walls. In mesophyll cells, nuclear movement from inner periclinal to anticlinal walls is induced repeatedly and specifically by blue light of high-fluence rate (more than 50 μ mol m⁻² s⁻¹) and is regulated by the blue light receptor phototropin2. Interestingly, mesophyll cells of the phot2 mutant have aberrantly positioned nuclei even in darkness. By contrast, the involvement of phototropins in nuclear positioning has not yet been examined for epidermal cells.Phototropin is a blue light receptor containing two light oxygen voltage domains at the N terminus, which bind an FMN chromophore, and a Ser/Thr kinase domain at the C terminus, which undergoes blue-light-dependent autophosphorylation (Briggs et al., 2001a; Christie, 2007). Arabidopsis possesses phototropins1 and 2 (Huala et al., 1997; Jarillo et al., 2001; Kagawa et al., 2001; Sakai et al., 2001). Phototropins are shown microscopically and biochemically to localize to the plasma membrane region (Briggs et al., 2001b; Sakamoto and Briggs, 2002; Kong et al., 2006) and mediate several responses, including phototropism (Liscum and Briggs, 1995; Sakai et al., 2001), stomatal opening (Kinoshita et al., 2001), and chloroplast movements (Jarillo et al., 2001; Kagawa et al., 2001; Sakai et al., 2001). In general, phototropin1 is more sensitive to light than its paralog and mediates low-fluence-rate light responses, whereas phototropin2 functions predominantly under higher fluence rates (Sakai et al., 2001).While the photoreceptor eliciting these nuclear movements has been revealed, the motile system responsible for moving the nuclei is still unknown. In general, organelle movements depend on the cytoskeleton, with the specific roles for actin and microtubules dependent on the organelle and species (Wada and Suetsugu, 2004). In land plants, the actin cytoskeleton plays a pivotal role in positioning organelles, including nuclei, chloroplasts, mitochondria, and peroxisomes (Wada and Suetsugu, 2004; Takagi et al., 2009).The role of the cytoskeleton in developmental nuclear movements has been investigated. In growing root hairs of Arabidopsis, the nuclear movements are driven along actin filaments (Ketelaar et al., 2002), whereas, in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) BY-2 cells, the cell-cycle-based nuclear migration before mitosis is found to depend on microtubules (Katsuta et al., 1990). In interphase Spirogyra crassa cells, centering of nuclei is regulated by both actin filaments and microtubules, but in distinct ways (Grolig, 1998). To the best of our knowledge, the cytoskeletal basis of environmentally induced nuclear movements in land plants has not been elucidated.The best-characterized organelle movements are the light-induced orientation movements of chloroplasts, and although exceptions have been reported, this movement depends on actin (Britz, 1979; Takagi, 2003; Wada et al., 2003). Under weak light, chloroplasts gather at the periclinal walls, perpendicular to the direction of light (accumulation response), whereas under strong light, they become positioned along the anticlinal walls, parallel to the direction of light (avoidance response). Recently, for Arabidopsis, Kadota et al. (2009) characterized the nature of the actin filaments probably involved in these movements. With the onset of either accumulation or avoidance response, short actin filaments appear at the leading edge of each chloroplast.In Arabidopsis, light-dependent nuclear positioning shows similarities to the chloroplast avoidance response, with regard to the direction of movement, relevant photoreceptor (phototropin2), and effective fluence rate (Iwabuchi and Takagi, 2008). On the other hand, nuclei are larger than chloroplasts and might require thicker, more rigid actin bundles for effective motility. Here, we investigate the involvement of the actin cytoskeleton as well as phototropin in regulatory system for nuclear positioning in epidermal cells of Arabidopsis leaves.     

Characterization of the Possible Roles for B Class MADS Box Genes in Regulation of Perianth Formation in Orchid

To investigate sepal/petal/lip formation in Oncidium Gower Ramsey, three paleoAPETALA3 genes, O. Gower Ramsey MADS box gene5 (OMADS5; clade 1), OMADS3 (clade 2), and OMADS9 (clade 3), and one PISTILLATA gene, OMADS8, were characterized. The OMADS8 and OMADS3 mRNAs were expressed in all four floral organs as well as in vegetative leaves. The OMADS9 mRNA was only strongly detected in petals and lips. The mRNA for OMADS5 was only strongly detected in sepals and petals and was significantly down-regulated in lip-like petals and lip-like sepals of peloric mutant flowers. This result revealed a possible negative role for OMADS5 in regulating lip formation. Yeast two-hybrid analysis indicated that OMADS5 formed homodimers and heterodimers with OMADS3 and OMADS9. OMADS8 only formed heterodimers with OMADS3, whereas OMADS3 and OMADS9 formed homodimers and heterodimers with each other. We proposed that sepal/petal/lip formation needs the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9. The determination of the final organ identity for the sepal/petal/lip likely depended on the presence or absence of OMADS5. The presence of OMADS5 caused short sepal/petal formation. When OMADS5 was absent, cells could proliferate, resulting in the possible formation of large lips and the conversion of the sepal/petal into lips in peloric mutants. Further analysis indicated that only ectopic expression of OMADS8 but not OMADS5/9 caused the conversion of the sepal into an expanded petal-like structure in transgenic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants.The ABCDE model predicts the formation of any flower organ by the interaction of five classes of homeotic genes in plants (Yanofsky et al., 1990; Jack et al., 1992; Mandel et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Jofuku et al., 1994; Pelaz et al., 2000, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Pinyopich et al., 2003; Ditta et al., 2004; Jack, 2004). The A class genes control sepal formation. The A, B, and E class genes work together to regulate petal formation. The B, C, and E class genes control stamen formation. The C and E class genes work to regulate carpel formation, whereas the D class gene is involved in ovule development. MADS box genes seem to have a central role in flower development, because most ABCDE genes encode MADS box proteins (Coen and Meyerowitz, 1991; Weigel and Meyerowitz, 1994; Purugganan et al., 1995; Rounsley et al., 1995; Theißen and Saedler, 1995; Theißen et al., 2000; Theißen, 2001).The function of B group genes, such as APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI), has been thought to have a major role in specifying petal and stamen development (Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Krizek and Meyerowitz, 1996; Kramer et al., 1998; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007; Kanno et al., 2007; Whipple et al., 2007; Irish, 2009). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), mutation in AP3 or PI caused identical phenotypes of second whorl petal conversion into a sepal structure and third flower whorl stamen into a carpel structure (Bowman et al., 1989; Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994). Similar homeotic conversions for petal and stamen were observed in the mutants of the AP3 and PI orthologs from a number of core eudicots such as Antirrhinum majus, Petunia hybrida, Gerbera hybrida, Solanum lycopersicum, and Nicotiana benthamiana (Sommer et al., 1990; Tröbner et al., 1992; Angenent et al., 1993; van der Krol et al., 1993; Yu et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2004; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; de Martino et al., 2006), from basal eudicot species such as Papaver somniferum and Aquilegia vulgaris (Drea et al., 2007; Kramer et al., 2007), as well as from monocot species such as Zea mays and Oryza sativa (Ambrose et al., 2000; Nagasawa et al., 2003; Prasad and Vijayraghavan, 2003; Yadav et al., 2007; Yao et al., 2008). This indicated that the function of the B class genes AP3 and PI is highly conserved during evolution.It has been thought that B group genes may have arisen from an ancestral gene through multiple gene duplication events (Doyle, 1994; Theißen et al., 1996, 2000; Purugganan, 1997; Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999; Lamb and Irish, 2003; Kim et al., 2004; Stellari et al., 2004; Zahn et al., 2005; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007). In the gymnosperms, there was a single putative B class lineage that duplicated to generate the paleoAP3 and PI lineages in angiosperms (Kramer et al., 1998; Theißen et al., 2000; Irish, 2009). The paleoAP3 lineage is composed of AP3 orthologs identified in lower eudicots, magnolid dicots, and monocots (Kramer et al., 1998). Genes in this lineage contain the conserved paleoAP3- and PI-derived motifs in the C-terminal end of the proteins, which have been thought to be characteristics of the B class ancestral gene (Kramer et al., 1998; Tzeng and Yang, 2001; Hsu and Yang, 2002). The PI lineage is composed of PI orthologs that contain a highly conserved PI motif identified in most plant species (Kramer et al., 1998). Subsequently, there was a second duplication at the base of the core eudicots that produced the euAP3 and TM6 lineages, which have been subject to substantial sequence changes in eudicots during evolution (Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999). The paleoAP3 motif in the C-terminal end of the proteins was retained in the TM6 lineage and replaced by a conserved euAP3 motif in the euAP3 lineage of most eudicot species (Kramer et al., 1998). In addition, many lineage-specific duplications for paleoAP3 lineage have occurred in plants such as orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009), Ranunculaceae, and Ranunculales (Kramer et al., 2003; Di Stilio et al., 2005; Shan et al., 2006; Kramer, 2009).Unlike the A or C class MADS box proteins, which form homodimers that regulate flower development, the ability of B class proteins to form homodimers has only been reported in gymnosperms and in the paleoAP3 and PI lineages of some monocots. For example, LMADS1 of the lily Lilium longiflorum (Tzeng and Yang, 2001), OMADS3 of the orchid Oncidium Gower Ramsey (Hsu and Yang, 2002), and PeMADS4 of the orchid Phalaenopsis equestris (Tsai et al., 2004) in the paleoAP3 lineage, LRGLOA and LRGLOB of the lily Lilium regale (Winter et al., 2002), TGGLO of the tulip Tulipa gesneriana (Kanno et al., 2003), and PeMADS6 of the orchid P. equestris (Tsai et al., 2005) in the PI lineage, and GGM2 of the gymnosperm Gnetum gnemon (Winter et al., 1999) were able to form homodimers that regulate flower development. Proteins in the euAP3 lineage and in most paleoAP3 lineages were not able to form homodimers and had to interact with PI to form heterodimers in order to regulate petal and stamen development in various plant species (Schwarz-Sommer et al., 1992; Tröbner et al., 1992; Riechmann et al., 1996; Moon et al., 1999; Winter et al., 2002; Kanno et al., 2003; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; Yao et al., 2008). In addition to forming dimers, AP3 and PI were able to interact with other MADS box proteins, such as SEPALLATA1 (SEP1), SEP2, and SEP3, to regulate petal and stamen development (Pelaz et al., 2000; Honma and Goto, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Castillejo et al., 2005).Orchids are among the most important plants in the flower market around the world, and research on MADS box genes has been reported for several species of orchids during the past few years (Lu et al., 1993, 2007; Yu and Goh, 2000; Hsu and Yang, 2002; Yu et al., 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Tsai et al., 2004, 2008; Xu et al., 2006; Guo et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2009). Unlike the flowers in eudicots, the nearly identical shape of the sepals and petals as well as the production of a unique lip in orchid flowers make them a very special plant species for the study of flower development. Four clades (1–4) of genes in the paleoAP3 lineage have been identified in several orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009). Several works have described the possible interactions among these four clades of paleoAP3 genes and one PI gene that are involved in regulating the differentiation and formation of the sepal/petal/lip of orchids (Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009). However, the exact mechanism that involves the orchid B class genes remains unclear and needs to be clarified by more experimental investigations.O. Gower Ramsey is a popular orchid with important economic value in cut flower markets. Only a few studies have been reported on the role of MADS box genes in regulating flower formation in this plant species (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). An AP3-like MADS gene that regulates both floral formation and initiation in transgenic Arabidopsis has been reported (Hsu and Yang, 2002). In addition, four AP1/AGAMOUS-LIKE9 (AGL9)-like MADS box genes have been characterized that show novel expression patterns and cause different effects on floral transition and formation in Arabidopsis (Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). Compared with other orchids, the production of a large and well-expanded lip and five small identical sepals/petals makes O. Gower Ramsey a special case for the study of the diverse functions of B class MADS box genes during evolution. Therefore, the isolation of more B class MADS box genes and further study of their roles in the regulation of perianth (sepal/petal/lip) formation during O. Gower Ramsey flower development are necessary. In addition to the clade 2 paleoAP3 gene OMADS3, which was previously characterized in our laboratory (Hsu and Yang, 2002), three more B class MADS box genes, OMADS5, OMADS8, and OMADS9, were characterized from O. Gower Ramsey in this study. Based on the different expression patterns and the protein interactions among these four orchid B class genes, we propose that the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9 is required for sepal/petal/lip formation. Further sepal and petal formation at least requires the additional presence of OMADS5, whereas large lip formation was seen when OMADS5 expression was absent. Our results provide a new finding and information pertaining to the roles for orchid B class MADS box genes in the regulation of sepal/petal/lip formation.     

The Association of the Arabidopsis Actin-Related Protein2/3 Complex with Cell Membranes Is Linked to Its Assembly Status But Not Its Activation

In growing plant cells, the combined activities of the cytoskeleton, endomembrane, and cell wall biosynthetic systems organize the cytoplasm and define the architecture and growth properties of the cell. These biosynthetic machineries efficiently synthesize, deliver, and recycle the raw materials that support cell expansion. The precise roles of the actin cytoskeleton in these processes are unclear. Certainly, bundles of actin filaments position organelles and are a substrate for long-distance intracellular transport, but the functional linkages between dynamic actin filament arrays and the cell growth machinery are poorly understood. The Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) “distorted group” mutants have defined protein complexes that appear to generate and convert small GTPase signals into an Actin-Related Protein2/3 (ARP2/3)-dependent actin filament nucleation response. However, direct biochemical knowledge about Arabidopsis ARP2/3 and its cellular distribution is lacking. In this paper, we provide biochemical evidence for a plant ARP2/3. The plant complex utilizes a conserved assembly mechanism. ARPC4 is the most critical core subunit that controls the assembly and steady-state levels of the complex. ARP2/3 in other systems is believed to be mostly a soluble complex that is locally recruited and activated. Unexpectedly, we find that Arabidopsis ARP2/3 interacts strongly with cell membranes. Membrane binding is linked to complex assembly status and not to the extent to which it is activated. Mutant analyses implicate ARP2 as an important subunit for membrane association.In plant cells, the actin cytoskeleton forms an intricate network of polymers that organizes the cytoplasm and defines the long-distance intracellular trafficking patterns of the cell. The actin network is critical not only for tip-growing cells (for review, see Cole and Fowler, 2006; Lovy-Wheeler et al., 2007) but also during the coordinated cell expansion that occurs in cells that utilize a diffuse growth mechanism (for review, see Wasteneys and Galway, 2003; Smith and Oppenheimer, 2005). For example, the polarized diffuse growth of leaf trichomes is highly sensitized to actin cytoskeleton disruption (Mathur et al., 1999; Szymanski et al., 1999), and a recent analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) ACTIN mutants revealed widespread cell swelling and isotropic expansion in numerous cell types in the root and shoot (Kandasamy et al., 2009). The actin network is dynamic. The array reorganizes during cell morphogenesis (Braun et al., 1999; Szymanski et al., 1999) and in response to endogenous (Lemichez et al., 2001) and external (Hardham et al., 2007) cues. A major research goal is to better understand not only how plant cells convert G-actin subunits to particular actin filament arrays but also how the actin network interacts with the cellular growth machinery during cell expansion.This is a difficult problem to solve, because in expanding vacuolated cells the actin array adopts numerous configurations and consists of dense meshworks of cortical actin filaments and bundles (Baluska et al., 2000), thick actin bundles that penetrate the central vacuole (Higaki et al., 2006), and meshworks of filaments and bundles that surround the nucleus and chloroplasts (Kandasamy and Meagher, 1999; Collings et al., 2000). The spatial relationships between these actin networks and localized cell expansion are not obvious. Certainly, the plasma membrane-cell wall interface is a critical location for the regulated delivery and fusion of vesicles containing cell wall polysaccharides. Frequent reports of localized domains of enriched cortical actin signal at regions of presumed localized cell expansion have led to the widely held view that the cortical actin array creates local tracks for vesicle-mediated secretion (for review, see Smith and Oppenheimer, 2005; Hussey et al., 2006). In one study, the dynamics of actin filaments were analyzed in living hypocotyl epidermal cells that utilize a diffuse growth mechanism (Staiger et al., 2009). In this case, individual actin filaments are very unstable and randomly oriented; therefore, the precise relationships between cortical F-actin, vesicle delivery, and cell shape change remain obscure. The best known function for the actin cytoskeleton is that of a track for myosin-dependent vesicle and organelle trafficking (Shimmen, 2007). The actin bundle network mediates the transport of cargo between endomembrane compartments (Geldner et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2005) and the long-distance actomyosin transport of a variety of organelles, including the Golgi (Nebenfuhr et al., 1999; Peremyslov et al., 2008; Prokhnevsky et al., 2008). Generation of distributed (Gutierrez et al., 2009; Timmers et al., 2009) and localized (Wightman and Turner, 2008) actin bundle networks appears to define early steps in the trafficking of Golgi-localized cellulose synthase complexes to the sites of primary and secondary wall synthesis, respectively.Plant cells employ diverse collections of G-actin-binding proteins, actin filament nucleators, and actin-bundling and cross-linking proteins to generate and remodel the F-actin network (for review, see Staiger and Blanchoin, 2006). One actin filament nucleator, termed the Actin-Related Protein2/3 (ARP2/3) complex, controls numerous aspects of plant morphogenesis and development. The vertebrate complex consists of the actin-related proteins ARP2 and ARP3 and five other unrelated proteins termed ARPC1 to ARPC5, in order of decreasing mass. ARP2/3 in isolation is inactive, but in the presence of proteins termed nucleation-promoting factors such as WAVE/SCAR (for WASP family Verprolin homologous/Suppressor of cAMP Repressor), ARP2/3 is converted into an efficient actin filament-nucleating machine (for review, see Higgs and Pollard, 2001; Welch and Mullins, 2002). In mammalian cells, ARP2/3 activities are linked to membrane dynamics. Keratocytes that crawl persistently on a solid substrate appear to use ARP2/3-generated dendritic actin filament networks at the leading edge to either drive or consolidate plasma membrane protrusion (Pollard and Borisy, 2003; Ji et al., 2008). In many vertebrate cell types, ARP2/3 has a strong punctate intracellular localization (Welch et al., 1997; Strasser et al., 2004), which could reflect hypothesized activities at the Golgi (Stamnes, 2002) or late endosomal (Fucini et al., 2002; Holtta-Vuori et al., 2005) compartment.Genetic studies in plants reveal nonessential but widespread functions for ARP2/3. In the moss Physcomitrella patens, the ARPC4 and ARPC1 subunit genes are critical during tip growth of protonemal filaments (Harries et al., 2005; Perroud and Quatrano, 2006). In Arabidopsis, loss of either ARP2/3 subunit gene or mutations in WAVE complex genes that positively regulate ARP2/3 cause complicated syndromes, including the loss of polarized diffuse growth throughout the shoot epidermis, defective cell-cell adhesion, and decreased hypocotyl elongation (for review, see Szymanski, 2005). Altered responses to exogenous Suc (Li et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2008) and reduced root elongation (Dyachok et al., 2008) are also reported for wave and arp2/3 strains. In higher plants, the involvement of ARP2/3 in tip growth and root hair development is more subtle. In Lotus japonicus, mutation of NAP1 and PIR1, known positive regulators of ARP2/3 (Basu et al., 2004; Deeks et al., 2004; El-Assal et al., 2004a), causes incompletely penetrant root hair phenotypes, but in the presence of symbiotic bacteria, the mutants have defective infection threads and reduced root nodule formation. Arabidopsis arp2/3 mutants do not have obvious tip growth defects in pollen tubes or root hairs, but in the presence of GFP:TALIN (Mathur et al., 2003b) and in double mutant combinations with the actin-binding protein CAP1 (Deeks et al., 2007), the effects of ARP2/3 on root hair growth are unmasked.In Arabidopsis, the genetics of the positive regulation of ARP2/3 are well characterized and appear to occur solely through another heteromeric complex termed WAVE (Eden et al., 2002; for review, see Szymanski, 2005). The putative WAVE/SCAR complex contains five subunits, one of which is the ARP2/3 activator SCAR. Plant SCARs contain conserved N-terminal and C-terminal domains that mediate interactions with other WAVE complex proteins and ARP2/3 activation, respectively (Frank et al., 2004; Basu et al., 2005). In nonplant systems, the regulatory relationships between WAVE and ARP2/3 appear to vary between cell types and species (for review, see Bompard and Caron, 2004; Stradal and Scita, 2006). However, in Arabidopsis, double mutant analyses indicate that WAVE is the sole pathway for ARP2/3 activation and that all subunits positively regulate ARP2/3 (Deeks et al., 2004; Basu et al., 2005; Djakovic et al., 2006). SCAR quadruple mutants are indistinguishable from arp2/3 null plants (Zhang et al., 2008). In moss, BRICK1 and ARP2/3 mutants have similar phenotypes, suggesting conserved regulatory relationships between WAVE and ARP2/3 in the plant kingdom (Harries et al., 2005; Perroud and Quatrano, 2006, 2008).Despite extensive molecular genetic knowledge about the ARP2/3 pathway and the strong actin cytoskeleton and growth phenotypes of arp2/3 plants, there are few direct data on the existence of the plant complex and its cellular function. There are reports of ARP2/3 localization based on the behavior of individual subunits (Le et al., 2003). In some cases, the results are weakened by the unknown specificity of heterologous ARP2/3 antibodies (Van Gestel et al., 2003; Fiserova et al., 2006). A specific antibody was raised against Silvetia ARP2 (Hable and Kropf, 2005). In developing zygotes, rhizhoid emergence is an early and actin-dependent developmental event, and at this stage a broad subcortical cone of ARP2 signal extends from the nuclear envelope toward the rhizhoid apex (Hable and Kropf, 2005). Double labeling experiments detected considerable overlap between ARP2 and actin, but surprisingly, there was a broad cortical domain of putative organelle-associated distal ARP2 that did not overlap with actin. In tip-growing P. patens chloronema cells, ARPC4 also appears to be membrane associated and localizes to a broad subcortical apical zone (Perroud and Quatrano, 2006). For these localization and genetic studies that rely on individual ARP2/3 subunits, it is important to prove that a plant ARP2/3 complex exists to test for an association of the complex with endomembrane compartments.In this paper, we provide several lines of evidence for an evolutionarily conserved pathway for ARP2/3 complex assembly in plant cells. These studies are based in part on genetic and biochemical analyses of the putative ARP2/3 subunit gene ARPC4. We found that disruption of the ARPC4 gene caused catastrophic disassembly of the complex and an array of phenotypes that were indistinguishable from known arp2/3 mutants. Chromatography experiments clearly revealed that functional hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged ARPC4 and endogenous ARP3 subunits assemble fully into ARP2/3 complexes. Surprisingly, much of the cellular pool of the plant ARP2/3 complex is membrane associated. An analysis of an extensive collection of wave and arp2/3 mutants allowed us to conclude that the normal association with membranes depended on the presence of ARP2 and the assembly status of the complex but not on the existence of an active pool of ARP2/3 in the cell.     

Phosphorylation of the C Terminus of RHD3 Has a Critical Role in Homotypic ER Membrane Fusion in Arabidopsis

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) consists of dynamically changing tubules and cisternae. In animals and yeast, homotypic ER membrane fusion is mediated by fusogens (atlastin and Sey1p, respectively) that are membrane-associated dynamin-like GTPases. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), another dynamin-like GTPase, ROOT HAIR DEFECTIVE3 (RHD3), has been proposed as an ER membrane fusogen, but direct evidence is lacking. Here, we show that RHD3 has an ER membrane fusion activity that is enhanced by phosphorylation of its C terminus. The ER network was RHD3-dependently reconstituted from the cytosol and microsome fraction of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) cultured cells by exogenously adding GTP, ATP, and F-actin. We next established an in vitro assay system of ER tubule formation with Arabidopsis ER vesicles, in which addition of GTP caused ER sac formation from the ER vesicles. Subsequent application of a shearing force to this system triggered the formation of tubules from the ER sacs in an RHD-dependent manner. Unexpectedly, in the absence of a shearing force, Ser/Thr kinase treatment triggered RHD3-dependent tubule formation. Mass spectrometry showed that RHD3 was phosphorylated at multiple Ser and Thr residues in the C terminus. An antibody against the RHD3 C-terminal peptide abolished kinase-triggered tubule formation. When the Ser cluster was deleted or when the Ser residues were replaced with Ala residues, kinase treatment had no effect on tubule formation. Kinase treatment induced the oligomerization of RHD3. Neither phosphorylation-dependent modulation of membrane fusion nor oligomerization has been reported for atlastin or Sey1p. Taken together, we propose that phosphorylation-stimulated oligomerization of RHD3 enhances ER membrane fusion to form the ER network.In eukaryotic cells, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the organelle with the largest membrane area. The ER consists of an elaborate network of interconnected membrane tubules and cisternae that is continually moving and being remodeled (Friedman and Voeltz, 2011). In plant cells, ER movement and remodeling is primarily driven by the actin-myosin XI cytoskeleton (Sparkes et al., 2009; Ueda et al., 2010; Yokota et al., 2011; Griffing et al., 2014) and secondarily by the microtubule cytoskeleton (Hamada et al., 2014). Several factors involved in creating the ER architecture have been also identified (Anwar et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2012; Goyal and Blackstone, 2013; Sackmann, 2014; Stefano et al., 2014a; Westrate et al., 2015). Among them, ER membrane-bound GTPases, animal atlastins and yeast Sey1p (Synthetic Enhancement of Yop1), function as ER fusogens to form the interconnected tubular network (Hu et al., 2009; Orso et al., 2009; Anwar et al., 2012). Atlastin molecules on the two opposed membranes have been proposed to transiently dimerize to attract the two membranes to each other (Bian et al., 2011; Byrnes and Sondermann, 2011; Morin-Leisk et al., 2011; Moss et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2012; Byrnes et al., 2013). Closely attracted lipid bilayers are supposed to be destabilized by an amphipathic helical domain at the atlastin C terminus to facilitate membrane fusion (Bian et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2012; Faust et al., 2015). Knockdown of atlastins leads to fragmentation of the ER and unbranched ER tubules, while overexpression of atlastins enhances ER membrane fusion, which enlarges the ER profiles (Hu et al., 2009; Orso et al., 2009).An Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) protein, ROOT HAIR DEFECTIVE3 (RHD3), has been proposed as a fusogen because (1) when it is disrupted, the ER network is modified into large cable-like strands of poorly branched membranes (Zheng et al., 2004; Chen et al., 2011; Stefano et al., 2012), (2) it shares sequence similarity with the above-mentioned fusogen Sey1p (Hu et al., 2009), and (3) it has structural similarity to atlastin and Sey1p, with a functional GTPase domain at the N-terminal cytosolic domain (Stefano et al., 2012) followed by two transmembrane domains and a cytosolic tail. RHD3 has a longer cytosolic C-terminal tail than do atlastin and Sey1p (Stefano and Brandizzi, 2014). It contains not only an amphipathic region but also a Ser/Thr-rich C terminus.Arabidopsis has two RHD3 isoforms called RHD3-Like 1 and RHD3-Like 2. Fluorescently tagged RHD3 and RHD3-Like 2 localize to the ER (Chen et al., 2011; Stefano et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2013). RHD3 and the two RHD3-Like proteins likely have redundant roles in ER membrane fusion (Zhang et al., 2013). Overexpression of either RHD3 or RHD3-Like 2 with a defective GTPase domain phenocopies the aberrant ER morphology in rhd3-deficient mutants (Chen et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2013).In this study, we show that the Ser/Thr-rich C terminus enhances ER membrane fusion following phosphorylation of its C terminus. We propose a model in which phosphorylation and oligomerization of RHD3 is required for efficient ER membrane fusion. Our findings clarify the mechanisms that regulate RHD3 and consequently the homeostasis of membrane fusion in the ER.     

Involvement of the Sieve Element Cytoskeleton in Electrical Responses to Cold Shocks

This study dealt with the visualization of the sieve element (SE) cytoskeleton and its involvement in electrical responses to local cold shocks, exemplifying the role of the cytoskeleton in Ca²⁺-triggered signal cascades in SEs. High-affinity fluorescent phalloidin as well as immunocytochemistry using anti-actin antibodies demonstrated a fully developed parietal actin meshwork in SEs. The involvement of the cytoskeleton in electrical responses and forisome conformation changes as indicators of Ca²⁺ influx was investigated by the application of cold shocks in the presence of diverse actin disruptors (latrunculin A and cytochalasin D). Under control conditions, cold shocks elicited a graded initial voltage transient, ΔV₁, reduced by external La³⁺ in keeping with the involvement of Ca²⁺ channels, and a second voltage transient, ΔV₂. Cytochalasin D had no effect on ΔV₁, while ΔV₁ was significantly reduced with 500 nm latrunculin A. Forisome dispersion was triggered by cold shocks of 4°C or greater, which was indicative of an all-or-none behavior. Forisome dispersion was suppressed by incubation with latrunculin A. In conclusion, the cytoskeleton controls cold shock-induced Ca²⁺ influx into SEs, leading to forisome dispersion and sieve plate occlusion in fava bean (Vicia faba).It has been argued for a long time that sieve elements (SEs) are devoid of a cytoskeleton (Parthasarathy and Pesacreta, 1980; Thorsch and Esau, 1981; Evert, 1990), but more recent biochemical and cytological studies favor the opposite view. Actin as well as profilin were detected in phloem exudates of various monocot and dicot species (Schobert et al., 1998, 2000), while immunocytochemical tests showed the presence of actin and tubulin in phloem exudates of pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima; Kulikova and Puryaseva, 2002). Proteome analyses gave further credence to the occurrence of microfilaments in SEs in castor bean (Ricinus communis; profilin; Barnes et al., 2004), pumpkin (actin; Walz et al., 2004), canola (Brassica napus; actin, profilin1 and profilin2, actin-depolymerizing factor4; Giavalisco et al., 2006), and rice (Oryza sativa; actin1, actin-depolymerizing factor2, actin depolymerizing-factor3, and actin-depolymerizing factor6; Aki et al., 2008). Moreover, cytological evidence suggests residues of a cytoskeleton in SEs; fluorescent immunolabeling identified an actin/myosin system at the sieve plates (Chaffey and Barlow, 2002).Theoretical considerations also call for the presence of a cytoskeleton in SEs. Turnover and addressing of macromolecules (Fisher et al., 1992; Leineweber et al., 2000) requires a local distribution network in SEs. This function was attributed to an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) continuous to the ER strands running through pore plasmodesma units (Blackman et al., 1998) into the companion cells. Although such a mechanism is essentially conceivable, an interaction between the ER and cytoskeleton would provide a more conventional mode of intracellular distribution (Hepler et al., 1990; Boevink et al., 1998; Ueda et al., 2010; Yokota et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2012). Moreover, macromolecular trafficking through pore plasmodesma units (Lucas et al., 2001) was proposed to be executed by actin and myosin (Oparka, 2004), implying the presence of a cytoskeleton in SEs. Despite the massive circumstantial evidence, however, a complete cytoskeleton network and its spatial distribution in SEs have not been visually documented thus far.The existence of an SE cytoskeleton would raise questions regarding its task(s) in this highly specialized cell type. In other plant cells, the cytoskeleton was proposed to be engaged, among others, in ion channel operation and intracellular signaling (Trewavas and Malho, 1997; Mazars et al., 1997, and refs. therein; Thuleau et al., 1998; Örvar et al., 2000; Sangwan et al., 2001; Drøbak et al., 2004; Davies and Stankovic, 2006), as in animal cells (Janmey, 1998; Lange and Gartzke, 2006). For instance, K⁺ fluxes are regulated by actin dynamics (Hwang et al., 1997; Liu and Luan, 1998; Chérel, 2004), while Ca²⁺ influx into the cytoplasm appears to be mediated by voltage-dependent Ca²⁺-permeable channels associated with microtubules (Mazars et al., 1997; Thion et al., 1998) or by mechanosensitive channels possibly associated with microfilaments (Wang et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2007).Both types of Ca²⁺-permeable channels probably reside in the SE plasma membrane (Knoblauch et al., 2001; Hafke et al., 2007, 2009; Furch et al., 2009), where they are likely involved in Ca²⁺-dependent systemic signaling (Furch et al., 2009; Hafke et al., 2009; van Bel et al., 2011; Hafke and van Bel, 2013). These channels are also putative initiators of Ca²⁺-induced signal transduction in SEs, leading to sieve-plate occlusion in response to local cold shocks (Thorpe et al., 2010). In fava bean (Vicia faba), Ca²⁺-dependent sieve tube occlusion by dispersion of special phloem-specific proteins (P-proteins) known as forisomes has been studied intensely (Knoblauch et al., 2001; Furch et al., 2007, 2009; Thorpe et al., 2010). Thus, apart from its distributive tasks, a cytoskeleton may be of major importance for intracellular signaling cascades in the highly specialized, sparsely equipped SEs.Our objective was to investigate the existence and spatial distribution of an SE cytoskeleton and its engagement in local signaling through Ca²⁺ influx brought about by cold shocks. This study dealt with the visualization of cytoskeletal components in intact sieve tubes using microinjection of fluorescent phalloidin and immunocytochemistry. Confocal laser-scanning micrography (CLSM) and transmission electron microscopy unequivocally showed a parietally located cylindrical actin meshwork. We demonstrated the engagement of the network in local cold shock-induced electrical responses and its association with Ca²⁺ influx, since we found effects of the Ca²⁺ channel blocker La³⁺ and of the cytoskeleton disruptor latrunculin A (LatA) on electrical signatures triggered by cold shocks and, by consequence, on forisome conformation changes.     

Interdependence of Endomembrane Trafficking and Actin Dynamics during Polarized Growth of Arabidopsis Pollen Tubes

During polarized growth of pollen tubes, endomembrane trafficking and actin polymerization are two critical processes that establish membrane/wall homeostasis and maintain growth polarity. Fine-tuned interactions between these two processes are therefore necessary but poorly understood. To better understand such cross talk in the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), we first established optimized concentrations of drugs that interfere with either endomembrane trafficking or the actin cytoskeleton, then examined pollen tube growth using fluorescent protein markers that label transport vesicles, endosomes, or the actin cytoskeleton. Both brefeldin A (BFA) and wortmannin disturbed the motility and structural integrity of ARA7- but not ARA6-labeled endosomes, suggesting heterogeneity of the endosomal populations. Disrupting endomembrane trafficking by BFA or wortmannin perturbed actin polymerization at the apical region but not in the longitudinal actin cables in the shank. The interference of BFA/wortmannin with actin polymerization was progressive rather than rapid, suggesting an indirect effect, possibly due to perturbed endomembrane trafficking of certain membrane-localized signaling proteins. Both the actin depolymerization drug latrunculin B and the actin stabilization drug jasplakinolide rapidly disrupted transport of secretory vesicles, but each drug caused distinct responses on different endosomal populations labeled by ARA6 or ARA7, indicating that a dynamic actin cytoskeleton was critical for some steps in endomembrane trafficking. Our results provide evidence of cross talk between endomembrane trafficking and the actin cytoskeleton in pollen tubes.Pollen tubes of flowering plants are specialized cells that deliver immotile sperm to the proximity of female gametes for successful reproduction (Johnson and Preuss, 2002). The growth of pollen tubes is both polar and directional (Hepler et al., 2001); many cellular activities contribute to such growth, the most important being the dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton system, targeted exocytosis, and endocytosis (Hepler et al., 2001).Pollen tubes contain longitudinal actin cables along the shank, which are important for providing structural support and acting as tracks for the movement of large organelles (Staiger et al., 1994). The apical area of pollen tubes instead contains dynamic filamentous actin (F-actin), as shown by fluorescently labeled actin-binding proteins (Kost et al., 1999; Fu et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2002; Wilsen et al., 2006). The dynamics of F-actin are critical for the polarized growth of pollen tubes. Genetically manipulating the activities of the small GTPases ROP (Kost et al., 1999; Fu et al., 2001; Cheung et al., 2008) and Rab (de Graaf et al., 2005), or of actin-binding proteins such as profilin and formin (Staiger et al., 1994; Chen et al., 2002; Cheung and Wu, 2004), disrupted F-actin dynamics and inhibited tube growth and caused apical bulges. Application of drugs such as latrunculin B (LatB) and jasplakinolide (Jas) showed similar effects (Gibbon et al., 1999; Vidali et al., 2001; Cardenas et al., 2005; Hörmanseder et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2007).Targeted exocytosis delivers building materials for cell membranes and cell walls and therefore is critical for maintaining growth polarity and directionality of growing pollen tubes (Hepler et al., 2001). Because targeted exocytosis brings more membrane and wall materials than needed to the apex of a pollen tube, an active endocytic system exists to retrieve excess secreted materials. In addition to this nonselective bulk membrane retrieval, pollen tubes may have selective and regulated endocytic trafficking pathways. For example, experiments using charged gold particles indicated the existence of two distinct endocytic pathways in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) pollen tubes (Moscatelli et al., 2007), and other studies showed that pollen tubes are able to take in materials from the extracellular matrix (Lind et al., 1996; Goldraij et al., 2006). The axis of targeted exocytosis correlated with the direction of tube growth and it asymmetrically changed toward the new apex during tube reorientation (Camacho and Malho, 2003; de Graaf et al., 2005). Disruption of membrane trafficking altered growth trajectories (de Graaf et al., 2005). Both suggest that membrane trafficking is a critical part of polarity maintenance and reorientation.As two important cellular processes in pollen tube growth, membrane trafficking and actin polymerization are conceivably dependent on each other. For example, several studies demonstrated that dynamic actin polymerization was essential for membrane trafficking (Hörmanseder et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2008), while others explored whether membrane trafficking affected actin polymerization (de Graaf et al., 2005; Hörmanseder et al., 2005). These studies, however, were mostly done with rapidly growing pollen tubes from tobacco or lily (Lilium longiflorum). For the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), whose pollen tubes grow slower, little is known in this regard. Given a robust protocol for Arabidopsis pollen germination (Boavida and McCormick, 2007), it is now possible to investigate the interactions between these two cellular activities.In this study, we analyzed the effects of drug treatments on Arabidopsis pollen tubes expressing fluorescent protein probes for transport vesicles, endosomes, or the actin cytoskeleton. We show that perturbing actin dynamics by LatB or Jas treatments disrupted the V-shaped distribution of transport vesicles, caused aggregation, and finally dissipation of a subpopulation of endosomes, indicating that actin dynamics are critical at some steps of endomembrane trafficking. On the other hand, disturbing endomembrane trafficking with brefeldin A (BFA) or wortmannin abolished the F-actin structure at the apical region without affecting the longitudinal actin cables at the shank. These results provide evidence that endomembrane trafficking and actin dynamics interact at certain steps during polarized growth of Arabidopsis pollen tubes.     

The K-Segment of Maize DHN1 Mediates Binding to Anionic Phospholipid Vesicles and Concomitant Structural Changes

Dehydrins (DHNs; late embryogenesis abundant D11 family) are a family of intrinsically unstructured plant proteins that accumulate in the late stages of seed development and in vegetative tissues subjected to water deficit, salinity, low temperature, or abscisic acid treatment. We demonstrated previously that maize (Zea mays) DHNs bind preferentially to anionic phospholipid vesicles; this binding is accompanied by an increase in α-helicity of the protein, and adoption of α-helicity can be induced by sodium dodecyl sulfate. All DHNs contain at least one “K-segment,” a lysine-rich 15-amino acid consensus sequence. The K-segment is predicted to form a class A2 amphipathic α-helix, a structural element known to interact with membranes and proteins. Here, three K-segment deletion proteins of maize DHN1 were produced. Lipid vesicle-binding assays revealed that the K-segment is required for binding to anionic phospholipid vesicles, and adoption of α-helicity of the K-segment accounts for most of the conformational change of DHNs upon binding to anionic phospholipid vesicles or sodium dodecyl sulfate. The adoption of structure may help stabilize cellular components, including membranes, under stress conditions.When plants encounter environmental stresses such as drought or low temperature, various responses take place to adapt to these conditions. Typical responses include increased expression of chaperones, signal transduction pathway and late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins, osmotic adjustment, and induction of degradation and repair systems (Ingram and Bartels, 1996).Dehydrins (DHNs; LEA D11 family) are a subfamily of group 2 LEA proteins that accumulate to high levels during late stages of seed development and in vegetative tissues subjected to water deficit, salinity, low temperature, or abscisic acid (ABA) treatment (Svensson et al., 2002). Some DHNs are expressed constitutively during normal growth (Nylander et al., 2001; Rorat et al., 2004, 2006; Rodriguez et al., 2005). DHNs exist in a wide range of photosynthetic organisms, including angiosperms, gymnosperms, algae, and mosses (Svensson et al., 2002). DHNs are encoded by a dispersed multigene family and are differentially regulated, at least in higher plants. For example, 13 Dhn genes have been identified in barley (Hordeum vulgare), dispersed over seven genetic map locations (Choi et al., 1999; Svensson et al., 2002) and regulated variably by drought, low temperature, and embryo development (Tommasini et al., 2008). DHNs are localized in various subcellular compartments, including cytosol (Roberts et al., 1993), nucleus (Houde et al., 1995), chloroplast (Artus et al., 1996), vacuole (Heyen et al., 2002), and proximal to the plasma membrane and protein bodies (Asghar et al., 1994; Egerton-Warburton et al., 1997; Puhakainen et al., 2004). Elevated expression of Dhn genes generally has been correlated with the acquisition of tolerance to abiotic stresses such as drought (Whitsitt et al., 1997), salt (Godoy et al., 1994; Jayaprakash et al., 1998), chilling (Ismail et al., 1999a), or freezing (Houde et al., 1995; Danyluk et al., 1998; Fowler et al., 2001). The differences in expression and tissue location suggest that individual members of the Dhn multigene family have somewhat distinct biological functions (Close, 1997; Zhu et al., 2000; Nylander et al., 2001). Many studies have observed a positive correlation between the accumulation of DHNs and tolerance to abiotic stresses (Svensson et al., 2002). However, overexpression of a single DHN protein has not, in general, been sufficient to confer stress tolerance (Puhakainen et al., 2004).DHNs are subclassified by sequence motifs referred to as the K-segment (Lys-rich consensus sequence), the Y-segment (N-terminal conserved sequence), the S-segment (a tract of Ser residues), and the φ-segment (Close, 1996). Because of high hydrophilicity, high content of Gly (>20%), and the lack of a defined three-dimensional structure in the pure form (Lisse et al., 1996), DHNs have been categorized as “intrinsically disordered/unstructured proteins” or “hydrophilins” (Wright and Dyson, 1999; Garay-Arroyo et al., 2000; Tompa, 2005; Kovacs et al., 2008). On the basis of compositional and biophysical properties and their link to abiotic stresses, several functions of DHNs have been proposed, including ion sequestration (Roberts et al., 1993), water retention (McCubbin et al., 1985), and stabilization of membranes or proteins (Close, 1996, 1997). Observations from in vitro experiments include DHN binding to lipid vesicles (Koag et al., 2003; Kovacs et al., 2008) or metals (Svensson et al., 2000; Heyen et al., 2002; Kruger et al., 2002; Alsheikh et al., 2003; Hara et al., 2005), protection of membrane lipid against peroxidation (Hara et al., 2003), retention of hydration or ion sequestration (Bokor et al., 2005; Tompa et al., 2006), and chaperone activity against the heat-induced inactivation and aggregation of various proteins (Kovacs et al., 2008).Intrinsically disordered/unstructured proteins that lack a well-defined three-dimensional structure have recently been recognized to be prevalent in prokaryotes and eukaryotes (Oldfield et al., 2005). They fulfill important functions in signal transduction, gene expression, and binding to targets such as protein, RNA, ions, and membranes (Wright and Dyson, 1999; Tompa, 2002; Dyson and Wright, 2005). The disorder confers structural flexibility and malleability to adapt to changes in the protein environment, including water potential, pH, ionic strength, and temperature, and to undergo structural transition when complexed with ligands such as other proteins, DNA, RNA, or membranes (Prestrelski et al., 1993; Uversky, 2002). Structural changes from disorder to ordered functional structure also can be induced by the folding of a partner protein (Wright and Dyson, 1999; Tompa, 2002; Mouillon et al., 2008).The idea that DHNs interact with membranes is consistent with many immunolocalization studies, which have shown that DHNs accumulate near the plasma membrane or membrane-rich areas surrounding lipid and protein bodies (Asghar et al., 1994; Egerton-Warburton et al., 1997; Danyluk et al., 1998; Puhakainen et al., 2004). The K-segment is predicted to form a class A2 amphipathic α-helix, in which hydrophilic and hydrophobic residues are arranged on opposite faces (Close, 1996). The amphipathic α-helix is a structural element known to interact with membranes and proteins (Epand et al., 1995). Also, in the presence of helical inducers such as SDS and trifluoroethanol (Dalal and Pio, 2006), DHNs take on α-helicity (Lisse et al., 1996; Ismail et al., 1999b). We previously examined the binding of DHN1 to liposomes and found that DHNs bind preferentially to anionic phospholipids and that this binding is accompanied by an increase in α-helicity of the protein (Koag et al., 2003). Similarly, a mitochondrial LEA protein, one of the group III LEA proteins, recently has been shown to interact with and protect membranes subjected to desiccation, coupled with the adoption of amphipathic α-helices (Tolleter et al., 2007).Here, we explore the basis of DHN-vesicle interaction using K-segment deletion proteins. This study reveals that the K-segment is necessary and sufficient for binding to anionic phospholipid vesicles and that the adoption of α-helicity of DHN proteins can be attributed mainly to the K-segment.     

RNA Silencing of Exocyst Genes in the Stigma Impairs the Acceptance of Compatible Pollen in Arabidopsis

Initial pollen-pistil interactions in the Brassicaceae are regulated by rapid communication between pollen grains and stigmatic papillae and are fundamentally important, as they are the first step toward successful fertilization. The goal of this study was to examine the requirement of exocyst subunits, which function in docking secretory vesicles to sites of polarized secretion, in the context of pollen-pistil interactions. One of the exocyst subunit genes, EXO70A1, was previously identified as an essential factor in the stigma for the acceptance of compatible pollen in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and Brassica napus. We hypothesized that EXO70A1, along with other exocyst subunits, functions in the Brassicaceae dry stigma to deliver cargo-bearing secretory vesicles to the stigmatic papillar plasma membrane, under the pollen attachment site, for pollen hydration and pollen tube entry. Here, we investigated the functions of exocyst complex genes encoding the remaining seven subunits, SECRETORY3 (SEC3), SEC5, SEC6, SEC8, SEC10, SEC15, and EXO84, in Arabidopsis stigmas following compatible pollinations. Stigma-specific RNA-silencing constructs were used to suppress the expression of each exocyst subunit individually. The early postpollination stages of pollen grain adhesion, pollen hydration, pollen tube penetration, seed set, and overall fertility were analyzed in the transgenic lines to evaluate the requirement of each exocyst subunit. Our findings provide comprehensive evidence that all eight exocyst subunits are necessary in the stigma for the acceptance of compatible pollen. Thus, this work implicates a fully functional exocyst complex as a component of the compatible pollen response pathway to promote pollen acceptance.In flowering plants, sexual reproduction occurs as a result of constant communication between the male gametophyte and the female reproductive organ, from the initial acceptance of compatible pollen to final step of successful fertilization (for review, see Beale and Johnson, 2013; Dresselhaus and Franklin-Tong, 2013; Higashiyama and Takeuchi, 2015). In the Brassicaceae, the stigmas that present a receptive surface for pollen are categorized as dry and covered with unicellular papillae (Heslop-Harrison and Shivanna, 1977). Communication is initiated rapidly following contact of a pollen grain with a stigmatic papilla, as the role of the papillae is to regulate the early cellular responses leading to compatible pollen germination. The basal compatible pollen recognition response also presents a barrier to foreign pollen or is inhibited with self-incompatible pollen (for review, see Dickinson, 1995; Hiscock and Allen, 2008; Chapman and Goring, 2010; Indriolo et al., 2014b).The initial adhesive interaction between the pollen grain and the papilla cell in the Brassicaceae is mediated by the exine of the pollen grain and the surface of the stigmatic papilla (Preuss et al., 1993; Zinkl et al., 1999). A stronger connection results between the adhered pollen grain and the stigmatic papilla with the formation of a lipid-protein interface (foot) derived from the pollen coat and the stigmatic papillar surface (Mattson et al., 1974; Stead et al., 1980; Gaude and Dumas, 1986; Elleman and Dickinson, 1990; Elleman et al., 1992; Preuss et al., 1993; Mayfield et al., 2001). It is at this point that a Brassicaceae-specific recognition of compatible pollen is proposed to occur (Hülskamp et al., 1995; Pruitt, 1999), though the nature of this recognition system is not clearly defined. Two stigma-specific Brassica oleracea glycoproteins, the S-Locus Glycoprotein and S-Locus Related1 (SLR1) protein, play a role in compatible pollen adhesion (Luu et al., 1997, 1999), potentially through interactions with the pollen coat proteins, PCP-A1 and SLR1-BP, respectively (Doughty et al., 1998; Takayama et al., 2000). The simultaneous recognition of self-incompatible pollen would also take place at this stage (for review, see Dresselhaus and Franklin-Tong, 2013; Indriolo et al., 2014b; Sawada et al., 2014). Thus, this interface not only provides a strengthened bond between the pollen grain and stigmatic papilla, but likely facilitates the interaction of signaling proteins from both partners to promote specific cellular responses in the stigmatic papilla toward the pollen grain.One response regulated by these interactions is the release of water from the stigmatic papilla to the adhered compatible pollen grain to enable the pollen grain to rehydrate, germinate, and produce a pollen tube (Zuberi and Dickinson, 1985; Preuss et al., 1993). Upon hydration, the pollen tube emerges at the site of pollen-papilla contact and penetrates the stigma surface between the plasma membrane and the overlaying cell wall (Elleman et al., 1992; Kandasamy et al., 1994). Pollen tube entry into the stigmatic surface represents a second barrier, selecting compatible pollen tubes. Subsequently, the compatible pollen tubes traverse down to the base of the stigma, enter the transmitting tract, and grow intracellularly toward ovules for fertilization. Pollen-pistil interactions at these later stages are also highly regulated (for review, see Beale and Johnson, 2013; Dresselhaus and Franklin-Tong, 2013; Higashiyama and Takeuchi, 2015).EXO70A1, a subunit of the exocyst, was identified as a factor involved in early pollen-stigma interactions, where it is required in the stigma for the acceptance of compatible pollen and inhibited by the self-incompatibility response (Samuel et al., 2009). Stigmas from the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) exo70A1 mutant display constitutive rejection of wild-type-compatible pollen (Samuel et al., 2009; Safavian et al., 2014). This stigmatic defect was rescued by the stigma-specific expression of an Red Fluorescent Protein (RFP):EXO70A1 transgene (Samuel et al., 2009) or partially rescued by providing a high relative humidity environment (Safavian et al., 2014). In addition, the stigma-specific expression of an EXO70A1 RNA interference construct in Brassica napus ‘Westar’ resulted in impaired compatible pollen acceptance and a corresponding reduction in seed production compared with compatible pollinations with wild-type B. napus ‘Westar’ pistils (Samuel et al., 2009). From these studies, EXO70A1 was found to be a critical component in stigmatic papillae to promote compatible pollen hydration and pollen tube entry through the stigma surface. One of the functions of the exocyst is to mediate polar secretion (for review, see Heider and Munson, 2012; Zárský et al., 2013; Synek et al., 2014). Consistent with this, previous studies have observed vesicle-like structures in proximity to the stigmatic papillar plasma membrane in response to compatible pollen in both Brassica spp. and Arabidopsis species (Elleman and Dickinson, 1990, 1996; Dickinson, 1995; Safavian and Goring, 2013; Indriolo et al., 2014a). The secretory activity is predicted to promote pollen hydration and pollen tube entry. As well, consistent with the proposed inhibition of EXO70A1 by the self-incompatibility pathway (Samuel et al., 2009), a complete absence or a significant reduction of vesicle-like structures at the stigmatic papillar plasma membrane was observed in the exo70A1 mutant and with self-incompatible pollen (Safavian and Goring, 2013; Indriolo et al., 2014a).The exocyst is a well-defined complex in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and animal systems, consisting of eight subunits, SEC3, SEC5, SEC6, SEC8, SEC10, SEC15, EXO70, and EXO84 (TerBush et al., 1996; Guo et al., 1999). Exocyst subunit mutants were first identified in yeast as secretory mutants displaying a cytosolic accumulation of secretory vesicles (Novick et al., 1980). Subsequent work defined roles for the exocyst in vesicle docking at target membranes in processes such as regulated secretion, polarized exocytosis, and cytokinesis to facilitate membrane fusion by Soluble NSF Attachment protein Receptor (SNARE) complexes (for review, see Heider and Munson, 2012; Liu and Guo, 2012). In plants, genes encoding all eight exocyst subunits have been identified, and many of these genes exist as multiple copies. For example, the Arabidopsis genome contains single copy genes for SEC6 and SEC8, two copies each for SECRETORY3 (SEC3), SEC5, SEC10, and SEC15, three EXO84 genes, and 23 EXO70 genes (Chong et al., 2010; Cvrčková et al., 2012; Vukašinović et al., 2014). Ultrastructural studies using electron tomography uncovered the existence of a structure resembling the exocyst in Arabidopsis (Otegui and Staehelin, 2004; Seguí-Simarro et al., 2004). Localization studies of specific Arabidopsis exocyst subunits also supported conserved roles in polarized exocytosis and cytokinesis in plants. Localization studies have shown EXO70, SEC6, and SEC8 at the growing tip of pollen tubes (Hála et al., 2008), EXO70A1 at the stigmatic papillar plasma membrane (Samuel et al., 2009), SEC3a, SEC6, SEC8, SEC15b, EXO70A1, and EXO84b at the root epidermal cell plasma membrane and developing cell plate (Fendrych et al., 2010, 2013; Wu et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013; Rybak et al., 2014), and SEC3a at the plasma membrane in the embryo and root hair (Zhang et al., 2013). Similar to the yeast exocyst mutants, vesicle accumulation has also been observed in the exo70A1 and exo84b mutants (Fendrych et al., 2010; Safavian and Goring, 2013). Taken together, these findings strongly support that plant exocyst subunits function in vivo in vesicle docking at sites of polarized secretion and cytokinesis (for review, see Zárský et al., 2013). In support of this, a recent study investigating Transport Protein Particle (TRAPP)II and exocyst complexes during cytokinesis in Arabidopsis has identified all eight exocyst components in immunoprecipitated complexes (SEC3a/SEC3b, SEC5a, SEC6, SEC8, SEC10, SEC15b, EXO70A1, EXO70H2, and EXO84b; Rybak et al., 2014).Several plant exocyst subunit genes have been implicated in biological processes that rely on regulated vesicle trafficking, where corresponding mutants have displayed a range of growth defects. At the cellular level, these phenotypes have been associated with decreased cell elongation and polar growth (Cole et al., 2005, 2014; Wen et al., 2005; Synek et al., 2006), defects in cytokinesis and cell plate formation (Fendrych et al., 2010; Wu et al., 2013; Rybak et al., 2014), and disrupted Pin-Formed (PIN) auxin efflux carrier recycling and polar auxin transport (Drdová et al., 2013). Several Arabidopsis subunit mutants display strong growth defects such as the sec3a mutant with an embryo-lethal phenotype (Zhang et al., 2013), sec6, sec8, and exo84b mutants with severely dwarfed phenotypes and defects in root growth (Fendrych et al., 2010; Wu et al., 2013; Cole et al., 2014), and exo70A1 with a milder dwarf phenotype (Synek et al., 2006). The Arabidopsis exo70A1 mutant has also been reported to have defects in root hair elongation, hypocotyl elongation, compatible pollen acceptance, seed coat deposition, and tracheary element differentiation (Synek et al., 2006; Samuel et al., 2009; Kulich et al., 2010; Li et al., 2013). Essential roles for other exocyst subunits include Arabidopsis SEC5a/SEC5b, SEC6, SEC8, and SEC15a/SEC15b in male gametophyte development and pollen tube growth (Cole et al., 2005; Hála et al., 2008; Wu et al., 2013), SEC8 in seed coat deposition (Kulich et al., 2010), SEC5a, SEC8, EXO70A1, and EXO84b in root meristem size and root cell elongation (Cole et al., 2014), and a maize (Zea mays) SEC3 homolog in root hair elongation (Wen et al., 2005). Finally, the Arabidopsis EXO70B1, EXO70B2, and EXO70H1 subunits have been implicated in plant defense responses (Pecenková et al., 2011; Stegmann et al., 2012; Kulich et al., 2013; Stegmann et al., 2013).Even with these detailed studies on the functions of exocyst subunits in plants, a systematic demonstration of the requirement of all eight exocyst subunits in a specific plant biological process is currently lacking. EXO70A1 was previously identified as an essential factor in the stigma for compatible pollen-pistil interactions in Arabidopsis and B. napus (Samuel et al., 2009), and we hypothesized that this protein functions as part of the exocyst complex to tether post-Golgi secretory vesicles to stigmatic papillar plasma membrane (Safavian and Goring, 2013). To provide support for the proposed biological role of the exocyst in the stigma for compatible pollen acceptance, we investigated the roles of the remaining seven subunits, SEC3, SEC5, SEC6, SEC8, SEC10, SEC15, and EXO84, in Arabidopsis stigmatic papillae. Given that some Arabidopsis exocyst subunits were previously determined to be essential at earlier growth stages, stigma-specific RNA-silencing constructs were used for each exocyst subunit, and the early postpollination stages were analyzed for these transgenic lines. Our collective data demonstrates that all eight exocyst subunits are required in the stigma for the early stages of compatible pollen-pistil interactions.     

Focus on Ethylene: Ethylene Biosynthesis Is Promoted by Very-Long-Chain Fatty Acids during Lysigenous Aerenchyma Formation in Rice Roots

In rice (Oryza sativa) roots, lysigenous aerenchyma, which is created by programmed cell death and lysis of cortical cells, is constitutively formed under aerobic conditions, and its formation is further induced under oxygen-deficient conditions. Ethylene is involved in the induction of aerenchyma formation. reduced culm number1 (rcn1) is a rice mutant in which the gene encoding the ATP-binding cassette transporter RCN1/OsABCG5 is defective. Here, we report that the induction of aerenchyma formation was reduced in roots of rcn1 grown in stagnant deoxygenated nutrient solution (i.e. under stagnant conditions, which mimic oxygen-deficient conditions in waterlogged soils). 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase (ACS) is a key enzyme in ethylene biosynthesis. Stagnant conditions hardly induced the expression of ACS1 in rcn1 roots, resulting in low ethylene production in the roots. Accumulation of saturated very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs) of 24, 26, and 28 carbons was reduced in rcn1 roots. Exogenously supplied VLCFA (26 carbons) increased the expression level of ACS1 and induced aerenchyma formation in rcn1 roots. Moreover, in rice lines in which the gene encoding a fatty acid elongase, CUT1-LIKE (CUT1L; a homolog of the gene encoding Arabidopsis CUT1, which is required for cuticular wax production), was silenced, both ACS1 expression and aerenchyma formation were reduced. Interestingly, the expression of ACS1, CUT1L, and RCN1/OsABCG5 was induced predominantly in the outer part of roots under stagnant conditions. These results suggest that, in rice under oxygen-deficient conditions, VLCFAs increase ethylene production by promoting 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid biosynthesis in the outer part of roots, which, in turn, induces aerenchyma formation in the root cortex.Aerenchyma formation is a morphological adaptation of plants to complete submergence and waterlogging of the soil, and facilitates internal gas diffusion (Armstrong, 1979; Jackson and Armstrong, 1999; Colmer, 2003; Voesenek et al., 2006; Bailey-Serres and Voesenek, 2008; Licausi and Perata, 2009; Sauter, 2013; Voesenek and Bailey-Serres, 2015). To adapt to waterlogging in soil, rice (Oryza sativa) develops lysigenous aerenchyma in shoots (Matsukura et al., 2000; Colmer and Pedersen, 2008; Steffens et al., 2011) and roots (Jackson et al., 1985b; Justin and Armstrong, 1991; Kawai et al., 1998), which is formed by programmed cell death and subsequent lysis of some cortical cells (Jackson and Armstrong, 1999; Evans, 2004; Yamauchi et al., 2013). In rice roots, lysigenous aerenchyma is constitutively formed under aerobic conditions (Jackson et al., 1985b), and its formation is further induced under oxygen-deficient conditions (Colmer et al., 2006; Shiono et al., 2011). The former and latter are designated constitutive and inducible lysigenous aerenchyma formation, respectively (Colmer and Voesenek, 2009). The gaseous plant hormone ethylene regulates adaptive growth responses of plants to submergence (Voesenek and Blom, 1989; Voesenek et al., 1993; Visser et al., 1996a,b; Lorbiecke and Sauter, 1999; Hattori et al., 2009; Steffens and Sauter, 2009; van Veen et al., 2013). Ethylene also induces lysigenous aerenchyma formation in roots of some gramineous plants (Drew et al., 2000; Shiono et al., 2008). The treatment of roots with ethylene or its precursor (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid [ACC]) stimulates aerenchyma formation in rice (Justin and Armstrong, 1991; Colmer et al., 2006; Yukiyoshi and Karahara, 2014), maize (Zea mays; Drew et al., 1981; Jackson et al., 1985a; Takahashi et al., 2015), and wheat (Triticum aestivum; Yamauchi et al., 2014a,b). Moreover, treatment of roots with inhibitors of ethylene action or ethylene biosynthesis effectively blocks aerenchyma formation under hypoxic conditions in maize (Drew et al., 1981; Konings, 1982; Jackson et al., 1985a; Rajhi et al., 2011).Ethylene biosynthesis is accomplished by two main successive enzymatic reactions: conversion of S-adenosyl-Met to ACC by 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase (ACS), and conversion of ACC to ethylene by 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase (ACO; Yang and Hoffman, 1984). The activities of both enzymes are enhanced during aerenchyma formation under hypoxic conditions in maize root (He et al., 1996). Since the ACC content in roots of maize is increased by oxygen deficiency and is strongly correlated with ethylene production (Atwell et al., 1988), ACC biosynthesis is essential for ethylene production during aerenchyma formation in roots. In fact, exogenously supplied ACC induced ethylene production in roots of maize (Drew et al., 1979; Konings, 1982; Atwell et al., 1988) and wheat (Yamauchi et al., 2014b), even under aerobic conditions. Ethylene production in plants is inversely related to oxygen concentration (Yang and Hoffman, 1984). Under anoxic conditions, the oxidation of ACC to ethylene by ACO, which requires oxygen, is almost completely repressed (Yip et al., 1988; Tonutti and Ramina, 1991). Indeed, anoxic conditions stimulate neither ethylene production nor aerenchyma formation in maize adventitious roots (Drew et al., 1979). Therefore, it is unlikely that the root tissues forming inducible aerenchyma are anoxic, and that the ACO-mediated step is repressed. Moreover, aerenchyma is constitutively formed in rice roots even under aerobic conditions (Jackson et al., 1985b), and thus, after the onset of waterlogging, oxygen can be immediately supplied to the apical regions of roots through the constitutively formed aerenchyma.Very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs; ≥20 carbons) are major constituents of sphingolipids, cuticular waxes, and suberin in plants (Franke and Schreiber, 2007; Kunst and Samuels, 2009). In addition to their structural functions, VLCFAs directly or indirectly participate in several physiological processes (Zheng et al., 2005; Reina-Pinto et al., 2009; Roudier et al., 2010; Ito et al., 2011; Nobusawa et al., 2013; Tsuda et al., 2013), including the regulation of ethylene biosynthesis (Qin et al., 2007). During fiber cell elongation in cotton ovules, ethylene biosynthesis is enhanced by treatment with saturated VLCFAs, especially 24-carbon fatty acids, and is suppressed by an inhibitor of VLCFA biosynthesis (Qin et al., 2007). The first rate-limiting step in VLCFA biosynthesis is condensation of acyl-CoA with malonyl-CoA by β-ketoacyl-CoA synthase (KCS; Joubès et al., 2008). KCS enzymes are thought to determine the substrate and tissue specificities of fatty acid elongation (Joubès et al., 2008). The Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genome has 21 KCS genes (Joubès et al., 2008). In the Arabidopsis cut1 mutant, which has a defect in the gene encoding CUT1 that is required for cuticular wax production (i.e. one of the KCS genes), the expression of AtACO genes and growth of root cells were reduced when compared with the wild type (Qin et al., 2007). Furthermore, expression of the AtACO genes was rescued by exogenously supplied saturated VLCFAs (Qin et al., 2007). These observations imply that VLCFAs or their derivatives work as regulatory factors for gene expression during some physiological processes in plants.reduced culm number1 (rcn1) was first identified as a rice mutant with a low tillering rate in a paddy field (Takamure and Kinoshita, 1985; Yasuno et al., 2007). The rcn1 (rcn1-2) mutant has a single nucleotide substitution in the gene encoding a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter subfamily G, RCN1/OsABCG5, causing an Ala-684Pro substitution (Yasuno et al., 2009). The mutation results in several mutant phenotypes, although the substrates of RCN1/OsABCG5 have not been determined (Ureshi et al., 2012; Funabiki et al., 2013; Matsuda et al., 2014). We previously found that the rcn1 mutant has abnormal root morphology, such as shorter root length and brownish appearance of roots, under stagnant (deoxygenated) conditions (which mimics oxygen-deficient conditions in waterlogged soils). We also found that the rcn1 mutant accumulates less of the major suberin monomers originating from VLCFAs in the outer part of adventitious roots, and this results in a reduction of a functional apoplastic barrier in the root hypodermis (Shiono et al., 2014a).The objective of this study was to elucidate the molecular basis of inducible aerenchyma formation. To this end, we examined lysigenous aerenchyma formation and ACC, ethylene, and VLCFA accumulation and their biosyntheses in rcn1 roots. Based on the results of these studies, we propose that VLCFAs are involved in inducible aerenchyma formation through the enhancement of ethylene biosynthesis in rice roots.