Profiling thimet oligopeptidase-mediated proteolysis in Arabidopsis thaliana

Protein homeostasis (proteostasis) is crucial for proper cellular function, including the production of peptides with biological functions through controlled proteolysis. Proteostasis has roles in maintenance of cellular functions and plant interactions with the environment under physiological conditions. Plant stress continues to reduce agricultural yields causing substantial economic losses; thus, it is critical to understand how plants perceive stress signals to elicit responses for survival. As previously shown in Arabidopsis thaliana, thimet oligopeptidases (TOPs) TOP1 (also referred to as organellar oligopeptidase) and TOP2 (also referred to as cytosolic oligopeptidase) are essential components in plant response to pathogens, but further characterization of TOPs and their peptide substrates is required to understand their contributions to stress perception and defense signaling. Herein, label-free peptidomics via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to differentially quantify 1111 peptides, originating from 369 proteins, between the Arabidopsis Col-0 wild type and top1top2 knock-out mutant. This revealed 350 peptides as significantly more abundant in the mutant, representing accumulation of these potential TOP substrates. Ten direct substrates were validated using in vitro enzyme assays with recombinant TOPs and synthetic candidate peptides. These TOP substrates are derived from proteins involved in photosynthesis, glycolysis, protein folding, biogenesis, and antioxidant defense, implicating TOP involvement in processes aside from defense signaling. Sequence motif analysis revealed TOP cleavage preference for non-polar residues in the positions surrounding the cleavage site. Identification of these substrates provides a framework for TOP signaling networks, through which the interplay between proteolytic pathways and defense signaling can be further characterized.     

Dysfunction of Arabidopsis MACPF domain protein activates programmed cell death via tryptophan metabolism in MAMP‐triggered immunity

Plant immune responses triggered upon recognition of microbe‐associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) typically restrict pathogen growth without a host cell death response. We isolated two Arabidopsis mutants, derived from accession Col‐0, that activated cell death upon inoculation with nonadapted fungal pathogens. Notably, the mutants triggered cell death also when treated with bacterial MAMPs such as flg22. Positional cloning identified NSL1 (Necrotic Spotted Lesion 1) as a responsible gene for the phenotype of the two mutants, whereas nsl1 mutations of the accession No‐0 resulted in necrotic lesion formation without pathogen inoculation. NSL1 encodes a protein of unknown function containing a putative membrane‐attack complex/perforin (MACPF) domain. The application of flg22 increased salicylic acid (SA) accumulation in the nsl1 plants derived from Col‐0, while depletion of isochorismate synthase 1 repressed flg22‐inducible lesion formation, indicating that elevated SA is needed for the cell death response. nsl1 plants of Col‐0 responded to flg22 treatment with an RBOHD‐dependent oxidative burst, but this response was dispensable for the nsl1‐dependent cell death. Surprisingly, loss‐of‐function mutations in PEN2, involved in the metabolism of tryptophan (Trp)‐derived indole glucosinolates, suppressed the flg22‐induced and nsl1‐dependent cell death. Moreover, the increased accumulation of SA in the nsl1 plants was abrogated by blocking Trp‐derived secondary metabolite biosynthesis, whereas the nsl1‐dependent hyperaccumulation of PEN2‐dependent compounds was unaffected when the SA biosynthesis pathway was blocked. Collectively, these findings suggest that MAMP‐triggered immunity activates a genetically programmed cell death in the absence of the functional MACPF domain protein NSL1 via Trp‐derived secondary metabolite‐mediated activation of the SA pathway.     

Salicylic acid antagonism of EDS1‐driven cell death is important for immune and oxidative stress responses in Arabidopsis

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have emerged as signals in the responses of plants to stress. Arabidopsis Enhanced Disease Susceptibility1 (EDS1) regulates defense and cell death against biotrophic pathogens and controls cell death propagation in response to chloroplast‐derived ROS. Arabidopsis Nudix hydrolase7 (nudt7) mutants are sensitized to photo‐oxidative stress and display EDS1‐dependent enhanced resistance, salicylic acid (SA) accumulation and initiation of cell death. Here we explored the relationship between EDS1, EDS1‐regulated SA and ROS by examining gene expression profiles, photo‐oxidative stress and resistance phenotypes of nudt7 mutants in combination with eds1 and the SA‐biosynthetic mutant, sid2. We establish that EDS1 controls steps downstream of chloroplast‐derived O₂^?? that lead to SA‐assisted H₂O₂ accumulation as part of a mechanism limiting cell death. A combination of EDS1‐regulated SA‐antagonized and SA‐promoted processes is necessary for resistance to host‐adapted pathogens and for a balanced response to photo‐oxidative stress. In contrast to SA, the apoplastic ROS‐producing enzyme NADPH oxidase RbohD promotes initiation of cell death during photo‐oxidative stress. Thus, chloroplastic O₂^?? signals are processed by EDS1 to produce counter‐balancing activities of SA and RbohD in the control of cell death. Our data strengthen the idea that EDS1 responds to the status of O₂^?? or O₂^??‐generated molecules to coordinate cell death and defense outputs. This activity may enable the plant to respond flexibly to different biotic and abiotic stresses in the environment.     

The TSC-mTOR Pathway Mediates Translational Activation of TOP mRNAs by Insulin Largely in a Raptor- or Rictor-Independent Manner

The stimulatory effect of insulin on protein synthesis is due to its ability to activate various translation factors. We now show that insulin can increase protein synthesis capacity also by translational activation of TOP mRNAs encoding various components of the translation machinery. This translational activation involves the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), as the knockout of TSC1 or TSC2 rescues TOP mRNAs from translational repression in mitotically arrested cells. Similar results were obtained upon overexpression of Rheb, an immediate TSC1-TSC2 target. The role of mTOR, a downstream effector of Rheb, in translational control of TOP mRNAs has been extensively studied, albeit with conflicting results. Even though rapamycin fully blocks mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) kinase activity, the response of TOP mRNAs to this drug varies from complete resistance to high sensitivity. Here we show that mTOR knockdown blunts the translation efficiency of TOP mRNAs in insulin-treated cells, thus unequivocally establishing a role for mTOR in this mode of regulation. However, knockout of the raptor or rictor gene has only a slight effect on the translation efficiency of these mRNAs, implying that mTOR exerts its effect on TOP mRNAs through a novel pathway with a minor, if any, contribution of the canonical mTOR complexes mTORC1 and mTORC2. This conclusion is further supported by the observation that raptor knockout renders the translation of TOP mRNAs rapamycin hypersensitive.     

CBP60g and SARD1 play partially redundant critical roles in salicylic acid signaling

Arabidopsis thaliana calmodulin binding protein 60g (CBP60g) contributes to production of salicylic acid (SA) in response to recognition of microbe‐associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) such as flg22, a fragment of bacterial flagellin. Calmodulin binding is required for the function of CBP60g in limiting growth of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola (Pma) ES4326 and activation of SA synthesis. Here, we describe a closely related protein, SARD1. Unlike CBP60g, SARD1 does not bind calmodulin. Growth of Pma ES4326 is enhanced in sard1 mutants. In cbp60g sard1 double mutants, growth of Pma ES4326 is greatly enhanced, and SA levels and expression of PR‐1 and SID2 are dramatically reduced. Expression profiling placed the CBP60g/SARD1 node between the PAD4/EDS1 and SA nodes in the defense signaling network, and indicated that CBP60g and SARD1 affect defense responses in addition to SA production. A DNA motif bound by CBP60g and SARD1, GAAATTT, was significantly over‐represented in promoters of CBP60g/SARD1‐dependent genes, suggesting that expression of these genes is modulated by CBP60g/SARD1 binding. Gene expression patterns showed a stronger effect of cbp60g mutations soon after activation of a defense response, and a stronger effect of sard1 mutations at later times. The results are consistent with a model in which CBP60g and SARD1 comprise a partially redundant protein pair that is required for activation of SA production as well as other defense responses, with CBP60g playing a more important role early during the defense response, and SARD1 to playing a more important role later.     

Critical roles of tyrosyl‐DNA phosphodiesterases in cell tolerance to carnosol‐induced DNA damage

Carnosol is a natural compound with pharmacological action due to its anti‐cancer properties. However, the precise mechanism for its anti‐carcinogenic effect remains elusive. In this study, we used lymphoblastoid TK6 cell lines to identify the DNA damage and repair mechanisms of carnosol. Our results showed that carnosol induced DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs). We also found that cells lacking tyrosyl‐DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1), an enzyme related to topoisomerase 1 (TOP1), and tyrosyl‐DNA phosphodiesterase 2 (TDP2), an enzyme related to topoisomerase 2 (TOP2), were supersensitive to carnosol. Carnosol was found to induce the formation of the TOP1‐DNA cleavage complex (TOP1cc) and TOP2‐DNA cleavage complex (TOP2cc). When comparing the accumulation of γ‐H2AX foci and the number of chromosomal aberrations (CAs) with wild‐type (WT) cells, the susceptivity of the TDP1^?/? and TDP2^?/? cells were associated with an increased DNA damage. Our results provided evidence of carnosol inducing DNA lesions in TK6 cells and demonstrated that the damage induced by carnosol was associated with abnormal topoisomerase activity. We conclude that TDP1 and TDP2 play important roles in the anti‐cancer effect of carnosol.     

Light-mediated regulation defines a minimal promoter region of TOP2

Light signaling has been demonstrated to be an important factor for plant growth and development; however, its role in the regulation of DNA replication and cell cycle has just started to be unraveled. In this work, we have demonstrated that the TOP2 promoter of Pisum sativum (pea) is activated by a broad spectrum of light including far-red light (FR), red light (RL) and blue light (BL). Deletion analyses of the TOP2 promoter in transformed plants, Arabidopsis thaliana and Nicotiana tobaccum (tobacco), define a minimal promoter region that is induced by RL, FR and BL, and is essential and sufficient for light-mediated activation. The minimal promoter of TOP2 follows the phytochrome- mediated low-fluence response similar to complex light regulated promoters. DNA–protein interaction studies reveal the presence of a DNA binding activity specific to a 106 bp region of the minimal promoter that is crucial for light-mediated activation. These results altogether indicate a direct involvement of light signaling in the regulation of expression of TOP2, one of the components of the DNA replication/cell cycle machinery.     

Induction of systemic disease resistance in Nicotiana benthamiana by the cyclodipeptides cyclo (l‐Pro‐l‐Pro) and cyclo (d‐Pro‐d‐Pro)

Cyclodipeptides, formed from two amino acids by cyclodehydration, are produced naturally by many organisms, and are known to possess a large number of biological activities. In this study, we found that cyclo (l ‐Pro‐l ‐Pro) and cyclo (d ‐Pro‐d ‐Pro) (where Pro is proline) could induce defence responses and systemic resistance in Nicotiana benthamiana. Treatment with the two cyclodipeptides led to a reduction in disease severity by Phytophthora nicotianae and Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) infections compared with controls. Both cyclopeptides triggered stomatal closure, induced reactive oxygen species production and stimulated cytosolic calcium ion and nitric oxide production in guard cells. In addition, the application of cyclodipeptides significantly up‐regulated the expression of the plant defence gene PR‐1a and the PR‐1a protein, and increased cellular salicylic acid (SA) levels. These results suggest that the SA‐dependent defence pathway is involved in cyclodipeptide‐mediated pathogen resistance in N. benthamiana. We report the systemic resistance induced by cyclodipeptides, which sheds light on the potential of cyclodipeptides for the control of plant diseases.