Salicylic acid antagonism of EDS1‐driven cell death is important for immune and oxidative stress responses in Arabidopsis

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have emerged as signals in the responses of plants to stress. Arabidopsis Enhanced Disease Susceptibility1 (EDS1) regulates defense and cell death against biotrophic pathogens and controls cell death propagation in response to chloroplast‐derived ROS. Arabidopsis Nudix hydrolase7 (nudt7) mutants are sensitized to photo‐oxidative stress and display EDS1‐dependent enhanced resistance, salicylic acid (SA) accumulation and initiation of cell death. Here we explored the relationship between EDS1, EDS1‐regulated SA and ROS by examining gene expression profiles, photo‐oxidative stress and resistance phenotypes of nudt7 mutants in combination with eds1 and the SA‐biosynthetic mutant, sid2. We establish that EDS1 controls steps downstream of chloroplast‐derived O₂^?? that lead to SA‐assisted H₂O₂ accumulation as part of a mechanism limiting cell death. A combination of EDS1‐regulated SA‐antagonized and SA‐promoted processes is necessary for resistance to host‐adapted pathogens and for a balanced response to photo‐oxidative stress. In contrast to SA, the apoplastic ROS‐producing enzyme NADPH oxidase RbohD promotes initiation of cell death during photo‐oxidative stress. Thus, chloroplastic O₂^?? signals are processed by EDS1 to produce counter‐balancing activities of SA and RbohD in the control of cell death. Our data strengthen the idea that EDS1 responds to the status of O₂^?? or O₂^??‐generated molecules to coordinate cell death and defense outputs. This activity may enable the plant to respond flexibly to different biotic and abiotic stresses in the environment.     

The truncated NLR protein TIR‐NBS13 is a MOS6/IMPORTIN‐α3 interaction partner required for plant immunity

Importin‐α proteins mediate the translocation of nuclear localization signal (NLS)‐containing proteins from the cytoplasm into the nucleus through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). Genetically, Arabidopsis IMPORTIN‐α3/MOS6 (MODIFIER OF SNC1, 6) is required for basal plant immunity and constitutive disease resistance activated in the autoimmune mutant snc1 (suppressor of npr1‐1, constitutive 1), suggesting that MOS6 plays a role in the nuclear import of proteins involved in plant defense signaling. Here, we sought to identify and characterize defense‐regulatory cargo proteins and interaction partners of MOS6. We conducted both in silico database analyses and affinity purification of functional epitope‐tagged MOS6 from pathogen‐challenged stable transgenic plants coupled with mass spectrometry. We show that among the 13 candidate MOS6 interactors we selected for further functional characterization, the TIR‐NBS‐type protein TN13 is required for resistance against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000 lacking the type‐III effector proteins AvrPto and AvrPtoB. When expressed transiently in N. benthamiana leaves, TN13 co‐immunoprecipitates with MOS6, but not with its closest homolog IMPORTIN‐α6, and localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), consistent with a predicted N‐terminal transmembrane domain in TN13. Our work uncovered the truncated NLR protein TN13 as a component of plant innate immunity that selectively binds to MOS6/IMPORTIN‐α3 in planta. We speculate that the release of TN13 from the ER membrane in response to pathogen stimulus, and its subsequent nuclear translocation, is important for plant defense signal transduction.     

The dependence of leaf senescence on the balance between 1‐aminocyclopropane‐1‐carboxylate acid synthase 1 (ACS1)‐catalysed ACC generation and nitric oxide‐associated 1 (NOS1)‐dependent NO accumulation in Arabidopsis

• Ethylene and nitric oxide (NO) act as endogenous regulators during leaf senescence. Levels of ethylene or its precursor 1‐aminocyclopropane‐1‐carboxylate acid (ACC) depend on the activity of ACC synthases (ACS), and NO production is controlled by NO‐associated 1 (NOA1). However, the integration mechanisms of ACS and NOA1 activity still need to be explored during leaf senescence.
• Here, using experimental techniques, such as physiological and molecular detection, liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry and fluorescence measurement, we investigated the relevant mechanisms.
• Our observations showed that the loss‐of‐function acs1‐1 mutant ameliorated age‐ or dark‐induced leaf senescence syndrome, such as yellowing and loss of chlorophyll, that acs1‐1 reduced ACC accumulation mainly in mature leaves and that acs1‐1‐promoted NOA1 expression and NO accumulation mainly in juvenile leaves, when compared with the wild type (WT). But the leaf senescence promoted by the NO‐deficient noa1 mutant was not involved in ACS1 expression. There was a similar sharp reduction of ACS1 and NOA1 expression with the increase in WT leaf age, and this inflection point appeared in mature leaves and coincided with the onset of leaf senescence.
• These findings suggest that NOA1‐dependent NO accumulation blocked the ACS1‐induced onset of leaf senescence, and that ACS1 activity corresponds to the onset of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis.

     

The diversion of 2‐C‐methyl‐d‐erythritol‐2,4‐cyclodiphosphate from the 2‐C‐methyl‐d‐erythritol 4‐phosphate pathway to hemiterpene glycosides mediates stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana

2‐C‐Methyl‐d ‐erythritol‐2,4‐cyclodiphosphate (MEcDP) is an intermediate of the plastid‐localized 2‐C‐methyl‐d ‐erythritol‐4‐phosphate (MEP) pathway which supplies isoprenoid precursors for photosynthetic pigments, redox co‐factor side chains, plant volatiles, and phytohormones. The Arabidopsis hds‐3 mutant, defective in the 1‐hydroxy‐2‐methyl‐2‐(E)‐butenyl‐4‐diphosphate synthase step of the MEP pathway, accumulates its substrate MEcDP as well as the free tetraol 2‐C‐methyl‐d ‐erythritol (ME) and glucosylated ME metabolites, a metabolic diversion also occurring in wild type plants. MEcDP dephosphorylation to the free tetraol precedes glucosylation, a process which likely takes place in the cytosol. Other MEP pathway intermediates were not affected in hds‐3. Isotopic labeling, dark treatment, and inhibitor studies indicate that a second pool of MEcDP metabolically isolated from the main pathway is the source of a signal which activates salicylic acid induced defense responses before its conversion to hemiterpene glycosides. The hds‐3 mutant also showed enhanced resistance to the phloem‐feeding aphid Brevicoryne brassicae due to its constitutively activated defense response. However, this MEcDP‐mediated defense response is developmentally dependent and is repressed in emerging seedlings. MEcDP and ME exogenously applied to adult leaves mimics many of the gene induction effects seen in the hds‐3 mutant. In conclusion, we have identified a metabolic shunt from the central MEP pathway that diverts MEcDP to hemiterpene glycosides via ME, a process linked to balancing plant responses to biotic stress.     

A TIR–NBS protein encoded by Arabidopsis Chilling Sensitive 1 (CHS1) limits chloroplast damage and cell death at low temperature

Survival of plants at low temperature depends on mechanisms for limiting physiological damage and maintaining growth. We mapped the chs1‐1 (chilling sensitive1‐1) mutation in Arabidopsis accession Columbia to the TIR‐NBS gene At1g17610. In chs1‐1, a single amino acid exchange at the CHS1 N‐terminus close to the conserved TIR domain creates a stable mutant protein that fails to protect leaves against chilling stress. The sequence of another TIR‐NBS gene (At5g40090) named CHL1 (CHS1‐like 1) is related to that of CHS1. Over‐expression of CHS1 or CHL1 alleviates chilling damage and enhances plant growth at moderate (24°C) and chilling (13°C) temperatures, suggesting a role for both proteins in growth homeostasis. chs1‐1 mutants show induced salicylic acid production and defense gene expression at 13°C, indicative of autoimmunity. Genetic analysis of chs1‐1 in combination with defense pathway mutants shows that chs1‐1 chilling sensitivity requires the TIR‐NBS‐LRR and basal resistance regulators encoded by EDS1 and PAD4 but not salicylic acid. By following the timing of metabolic, physiological and chloroplast ultrastructural changes in chs1‐1 leaves during chilling, we have established that alterations in photosynthetic complexes and thylakoid membrane integrity precede leaf cell death measured by ion leakage. At 24°C, the chs1‐1 mutant appears normal but produces a massive necrotic response to virulent Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato infection, although this does not affect bacterial proliferation. Our results suggest that CHS1 acts at an intersection between temperature sensing and biotic stress pathway activation to maintain plant performance over a range of conditions.     

γ‐glutamyl transpeptidase 1 specifically suppresses green‐light avoidance via GABAA receptors in Drosophila

Drosophila larvae innately show light avoidance behavior. Compared with robust blue‐light avoidance, larvae exhibit relatively weaker green‐light responses. In our previous screening for genes involved in larval light avoidance, compared with control w¹¹¹⁸ larvae, larvae with γ‐glutamyl transpeptidase 1 (Ggt‐1) knockdown or Ggt‐1 mutation were found to exhibit higher percentage of green‐light avoidance which was mediated by Rhodopsin6 (Rh6) photoreceptors. However, their responses to blue light did not change significantly. By adjusting the expression level of Ggt‐1 in different tissues, we found that Ggt‐1 in malpighian tubules was both necessary and sufficient for green‐light avoidance. Our results showed that glutamate levels were lower in Ggt‐1 null mutants compared with controls. Feeding Ggt‐1 null mutants glutamate can normalize green‐light avoidance, indicating that high glutamate concentrations suppressed larval green‐light avoidance. However, rather than directly, glutamate affected green‐light avoidance indirectly through GABA, the level of which was also lower in Ggt‐1 mutants compared with controls. Mutants in glutamate decarboxylase 1, which encodes GABA synthase, and knockdown lines of the GABA_A receptor, both exhibit elevated levels of green‐light avoidance. Thus, our results elucidate the neurobiological mechanisms mediating green‐light avoidance, which was inhibited in wild‐type larvae.

     

Characterization of stress‐responsive lncRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana by integrating expression,epigenetic and structural features

Agrobacterium genetically transforms plants by transferring and integrating T‐(transferred) DNA into the host genome. This process requires both Agrobacterium and host proteins. VirE2 interacting protein 1 (VIP1), an Arabidopsis bZIP protein, has been suggested to mediate transformation through interaction with and targeting of VirE2 to nuclei. We examined the susceptibility of Arabidopsis vip1 mutant and VIP1 overexpressing plants to transformation by numerous Agrobacterium strains. In no instance could we detect altered transformation susceptibility. We also used confocal microscopy to examine the subcellular localization of Venus‐tagged VirE2 or Venus‐tagged VIP1, in the presence or absence of the other untagged protein, in different plant cell systems. We found that VIP1–Venus localized in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus of Arabidopsis roots, agroinfiltrated Nicotiana benthamiana leaves, Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts and tobacco BY‐2 protoplasts, regardless of whether VirE2 was co‐expressed. VirE2 localized exclusively to the cytoplasm of tobacco and Arabidopsis protoplasts, whether in the absence or presence of VIP1 overexpression. In transgenic Arabidopsis plants and agroinfiltrated N. benthamina leaves we could occasionally detect small aggregates of the Venus signal in nuclei, but these were likely to be imagining artifacts. The vast majority of VirE2 remained in the cytoplasm. We conclude that VIP1 is not important for Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation or VirE2 subcellular localization.     

Dissecting virulence function from recognition: cell death suppression in Nicotiana benthamiana by XopQ/HopQ1‐family effectors relies on EDS1‐dependent immunity

Many Gram‐negative plant pathogenic bacteria express effector proteins of the XopQ/HopQ1 family which are translocated into plant cells via the type III secretion system during infection. In Nicotiana benthamiana, recognition of XopQ/HopQ1 proteins induces an effector‐triggered immunity (ETI) reaction which is not associated with strong cell death but renders plants immune against Pseudomonas syringae and Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria strains. Additionally, XopQ suppresses cell death in N. benthamiana when transiently co‐expressed with cell death inducers. Here, we show that representative XopQ/HopQ1 proteins are recognized similarly, likely by a single resistance protein of the TIR‐NB‐LRR class. Extensive analysis of XopQ derivatives indicates the recognition of structural features. We performed Agrobacterium‐mediated protein expression experiments in wild‐type and EDS1‐deficient (eds1) N. benthamiana leaves, not recognizing XopQ/HopQ1. XopQ recognition limits multiplication of Agrobacterium and attenuates levels of transiently expressed proteins. Remarkably, XopQ fails to suppress cell death reactions induced by different effectors in eds1 plants. We conclude that XopQ‐mediated cell death suppression in N. benthamiana is due to the attenuation of Agrobacterium‐mediated protein expression rather than the cause of the genuine XopQ virulence activity. Thus, our study expands our understanding of XopQ recognition and function, and also challenges the commonly used co‐expression assays for elucidation of in planta effector activities, at least under conditions of ETI induction.     

A flavonoid 3‐O‐glucoside:2″‐O‐glucosyltransferase responsible for terminal modification of pollen‐specific flavonols in Arabidopsis thaliana

Flavonol 3‐O‐diglucosides with a 1→2 inter‐glycosidic linkage are representative pollen‐specific flavonols that are widely distributed in plants, but their biosynthetic genes and physiological roles are not well understood. Flavonoid analysis of four Arabidopsis floral organs (pistils, stamens, petals and calyxes) and flowers of wild‐type and male sterility 1 (ms1) mutants, which are defective in normal development of pollen and tapetum, showed that kaempferol/quercetin 3‐O‐β‐d ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→2)‐β‐d ‐glucopyranosides accumulated in Arabidopsis pollen. Microarray data using wild‐type and ms1 mutants, gene expression patterns in various organs, and phylogenetic analysis of UDP‐glycosyltransferases (UGTs) suggest that UGT79B6 (At5g54010) is a key modification enzyme for determining pollen‐specific flavonol structure. Kaempferol and quercetin 3‐O‐glucosyl‐(1→2)‐glucosides were absent from two independent ugt79b6 knockout mutants. Transgenic ugt79b6 mutant lines transformed with the genomic UGT79B6 gene had the same flavonoid profile as wild‐type plants. Recombinant UGT79B6 protein converted kaempferol 3‐O‐glucoside to kaempferol 3‐O‐glucosyl‐(1→2)‐glucoside. UGT79B6 recognized 3‐O‐glucosylated/galactosylated anthocyanins/flavonols but not 3,5‐ or 3,7‐diglycosylated flavonoids, and prefers UDP‐glucose, indicating that UGT79B6 encodes flavonoid 3‐O‐glucoside:2″‐O‐glucosyltransferase. A UGT79B6‐GUS fusion showed that UGT79B6 was localized in tapetum cells and microspores of developing anthers.     

The grapevine (Vitis vinifera) LysM receptor kinases VvLYK1‐1 and VvLYK1‐2 mediate chitooligosaccharide‐triggered immunity

Chitin, a major component of fungal cell walls, is a well‐known pathogen‐associated molecular pattern (PAMP) that triggers defense responses in several mammal and plant species. Here, we show that two chitooligosaccharides, chitin and chitosan, act as PAMPs in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) as they elicit immune signalling events, defense gene expression and resistance against fungal diseases. To identify their cognate receptors, the grapevine family of LysM receptor kinases (LysM‐RKs) was annotated and their gene expression profiles were characterized. Phylogenetic analysis clearly distinguished three V. vinifera LysM‐RKs (VvLYKs) located in the same clade as the Arabidopsis CHITIN ELICITOR RECEPTOR KINASE1 (AtCERK1), which mediates chitin‐induced immune responses. The Arabidopsis mutant Atcerk1, impaired in chitin perception, was transformed with these three putative orthologous genes encoding VvLYK1‐1, ‐2, or ‐3 to determine if they would complement the loss of AtCERK1 function. Our results provide evidence that VvLYK1‐1 and VvLYK1‐2, but not VvLYK1‐3, functionally complement the Atcerk1 mutant by restoring chitooligosaccharide‐induced MAPK activation and immune gene expression. Moreover, expression of VvLYK1‐1 in Atcerk1 restored penetration resistance to the non‐adapted grapevine powdery mildew (Erysiphe necator). On the whole, our results indicate that the grapevine VvLYK1‐1 and VvLYK1‐2 participate in chitin‐ and chitosan‐triggered immunity and that VvLYK1‐1 plays an important role in basal resistance against E. necator.