Mutagenesis of Individual Pentatricopeptide Repeat Motifs Affects RNA Binding Activity and Reveals Functional Partitioning of Arabidopsis PROTON GRADIENT REGULATION3

Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins bind RNA and act in multiple eukaryotic processes, including RNA editing, RNA stability, and translation. Here, we investigated the mechanism underlying the functional versatility of Arabidopsis thaliana PROTON GRADIENT REGULATION3 (PGR3), a chloroplast protein harboring 27 PPR motifs. Previous studies suggested that PGR3 acts in (1) stabilization of photosynthetic electron transport L (petL) operon RNA, (2) translation of petL, and (3) translation of ndhA. We showed here that replacement of the 4th amino acid of the 12th PPR with nonpolar or charged amino acids abolished functions (1) and (2) but not (3) of PGR3 by compromising the function of this specific PPR. This discovery enabled us to knock out the RNA binding ability of individual PPR motifs. Consequently, we showed that the 16 N-terminal PPRs were sufficient for function (1) via sequence-specific RNA binding, whereas the 11 C-terminal motifs were essential for functions (2) and (3) by activating translation. We also clarified that the 14th amino acid of the 12th PPR should be positively charged to make the PPR functionally active. Our finding opens up the possibility of selectively manipulating the functions of PPR proteins.     

Improved Computational Target Site Prediction for Pentatricopeptide Repeat RNA Editing Factors

Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins with an E domain have been identified as specific factors for C to U RNA editing in plant organelles. These PPR proteins bind to a unique sequence motif 5′ of their target editing sites. Recently, involvement of a combinatorial amino acid code in the P (normal length) and S type (short) PPR domains in sequence specific RNA binding was reported. PPR proteins involved in RNA editing, however, contain not only P and S motifs but also their long variants L (long) and L2 (long2) and the S2 (short2) motifs. We now find that inclusion of these motifs improves the prediction of RNA editing target sites. Previously overlooked RNA editing target sites are suggested from the PPR motif structures of known E-class PPR proteins and are experimentally verified. RNA editing target sites are assigned for the novel PPR protein MEF32 (mitochondrial editing factor 32) and are confirmed in the cDNA.     

Structure of a PLS-class Pentatricopeptide Repeat Protein Provides Insights into Mechanism of RNA Recognition

Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins that form a pervasive family of proteins conserved in yeast, plants, and humans. The plant PPR proteins are grouped mainly into the P and PLS classes. Here, we report the crystal structure of a PLS-class PPR protein from Arabidopsis thaliana called THA8L (THA8-like) at 2.0 Å. THA8L resembles THA8 (thylakoid assembly 8), a protein that is required for the splicing of specific group II introns of genes involved in biogenesis of chloroplast thylakoid membranes. The THA8L structure contains three P-type PPR motifs flanked by one L-type motif and one S-type motif. We identified several putative THA8L-binding sites, enriched with purine sequences, in the group II introns. Importantly, THA8L has strong binding preference for single-stranded RNA over single-stranded DNA or double-stranded RNA. Structural analysis revealed that THA8L contains two extensive patches of positively charged residues next to the residues that are proposed to comprise the RNA-binding codes. Mutations in these two positively charged patches greatly reduced THA8L RNA-binding activity. On the basis of these data, we constructed a model of THA8L-RNA binding that is dependent on two forces: one is the interaction between nucleotide bases and specific amino acids in the PPR motifs (codes), and the other is the interaction between the negatively charged RNA backbone and positively charged residues of PPR motifs. Together, these results further our understanding of the mechanism of PPR protein-RNA interactions.     

A combinatorial amino Acid code for RNA recognition by pentatricopeptide repeat proteins

The pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) is a helical repeat motif found in an exceptionally large family of RNA-binding proteins that functions in mitochondrial and chloroplast gene expression. PPR proteins harbor between 2 and 30 repeats and typically bind single-stranded RNA in a sequence-specific fashion. However, the basis for sequence-specific RNA recognition by PPR tracts has been unknown. We used computational methods to infer a code for nucleotide recognition involving two amino acids in each repeat, and we validated this model by recoding a PPR protein to bind novel RNA sequences in vitro. Our results show that PPR tracts bind RNA via a modular recognition mechanism that differs from previously described RNA-protein recognition modes and that underpins a natural library of specific protein/RNA partners of unprecedented size and diversity. These findings provide a significant step toward the prediction of native binding sites of the enormous number of PPR proteins found in nature. Furthermore, the extraordinary evolutionary plasticity of the PPR family suggests that the PPR scaffold will be particularly amenable to redesign for new sequence specificities and functions.     

Pentatricopeptide repeat proteins and their emerging roles in plants.

Several protein families with tandem repeat motifs play a very important role in plant development and defense. The pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein family, one of the largest families, is the most perplexing one in plants. PPR proteins have been implicated in many crucial functions broadly involving organelle biogenesis and plant development. PPR motifs are degenerate motifs, each with 35-amino-acid sequences and are present in tandem arrays of 2-27 repeats per protein. Although PPR proteins are found in other eukaryotes, their large number is probably required in plants to meet the specific needs of organellar gene expression. The repeats of PPR proteins form a superhelical structure to bind a specific ligand, probably a single-stranded RNA molecule, and modulate its expression. Functional studies on different PPR proteins have revealed their role in organellar RNA processing, fertility restoration in CMS plants, embryogenesis, and plant development. Functional genomic techniques can help identify the diverse roles of the PPR family of proteins in nucleus-organelle interaction and in plant development.     

Pentatricopeptide repeats of protein-only RNase P use a distinct mode to recognize conserved bases and structural elements of pre-tRNA

Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) motifs are α-helical structures known for their modular recognition of single-stranded RNA sequences with each motif in a tandem array binding to a single nucleotide. Protein-only RNase P 1 (PRORP1) in Arabidopsis thaliana is an endoribonuclease that uses its PPR domain to recognize precursor tRNAs (pre-tRNAs) as it catalyzes removal of the 5′-leader sequence from pre-tRNAs with its NYN metallonuclease domain. To gain insight into the mechanism by which PRORP1 recognizes tRNA, we determined a crystal structure of the PPR domain in complex with yeast tRNA^Phe at 2.85 Å resolution. The PPR domain of PRORP1 bound to the structurally conserved elbow of tRNA and recognized conserved structural features of tRNAs using mechanisms that are different from the established single-stranded RNA recognition mode of PPR motifs. The PRORP1 PPR domain-tRNA^Phe structure revealed a conformational change of the PPR domain upon tRNA binding and moreover demonstrated the need for pronounced overall flexibility in the PRORP1 enzyme conformation for substrate recognition and catalysis. The PRORP1 PPR motifs have evolved strategies for protein-tRNA interaction analogous to tRNA recognition by the RNA component of ribonucleoprotein RNase P and other catalytic RNAs, indicating convergence on a common solution for tRNA substrate recognition.     

The 3' untranslated region of human vimentin mRNA interacts with protein complexes containing eEF-1gamma and HAX-1

Previously, we have shown that the vimentin 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR) contains a highly conserved region, which is sufficient for the perinuclear localization of a reporter mRNA. This region was shown to specifically bind protein(s) by band shift analyses. UV-cross-linking studies suggest these proteins are 46- and 35-kDa in mass. Here, we have used this sequence as ‘bait’ to isolate RNA binding proteins using the yeast three-hybrid method. This technique relies on a functional assay detecting bona fide RNA–protein interaction in vivo. Three cDNA isolates, HAX-1, eEF-1γ and hRIP, code for proteins of a size consistent with in vitro cross- linking studies. In all cases, recombinant proteins were capable of binding RNA in vitro. Although hRIP is thought to be a general mRNA binding protein, this represents an unreported activity for eEF-1γ and HAX-1. Moreover, HAX-1 binding appears to be specific to vimentin’s 3′UTR. Both in vivo synthesized eEF-1γ and HAX-1 proteins were ‘pulled out’ of HeLa whole cell extracts by binding to a RNA affinity column comprised of vimentin’s 3′UTR. Moreover, size-fractionation of extracts results in the separation of large complexes containing either eEF-1γ or HAX-1. Thus, in addition to their known functions, both eEF-1γ and HAX-1 are RNA binding proteins, which suggests new roles in mRNA translation and/or perinuclear localization.     

Comparative analysis of editosome proteins in trypanosomatids

Detailed comparisons of 16 editosome proteins from Trypanosoma brucei, Trypanosoma cruzi and Leishmania major identified protein motifs associated with catalysis and protein or nucleic acid interactions that suggest their functions in RNA editing. Five related proteins with RNase III-like motifs also contain a U1-like zinc finger and either dsRBM or Pumilio motifs. These proteins may provide the endoribonuclease function in editing. Two other related proteins, at least one of which is associated with U-specific 3′ exonuclease activity, contain two putative nuclease motifs. Thus, editosomes contain a plethora of nucleases or proteins presumably derived from nucleases. Five additional related proteins, three of which have zinc fingers, each contain a motif associated with an OB fold; the TUTases have C-terminal folds reminiscent of RNA binding motifs, thus indicating the presence of numerous nucleic acid and/or protein binding domains, as do the two RNA ligases and a RNA helicase, which provide for additional catalytic steps in editing. These data indicate that trypanosomatid RNA editing is orchestrated by a variety of domains for catalysis, molecular interaction and structure. These domains are generally conserved within other protein families, but some are found in novel combinations in the editosome proteins.     

Specificity of RNA Binding by CPEB: Requirement for RNA Recognition Motifs and a Novel Zinc Finger

CPEB is an RNA binding protein that interacts with the maturation-type cytoplasmic polyadenylation element (CPE) (consensus UUUUUAU) to promote polyadenylation and translational activation of maternal mRNAs in Xenopus laevis. CPEB, which is conserved from mammals to invertebrates, is composed of three regions: an amino-terminal portion with no obvious functional motif, two RNA recognition motifs (RRMs), and a cysteine-histidine region that is reminiscent of a zinc finger. In this study, we investigated the physical properties of CPEB required for RNA binding. CPEB can interact with RNA as a monomer, and phosphorylation, which modifies the protein during oocyte maturation, has little effect on RNA binding. Deletion mutations of CPEB have been overexpressed in Escherichia coli and used in a series of RNA gel shift experiments. Although a full-length and a truncated CPEB that lacks 139 amino-terminal amino acids bind CPE-containing RNA avidly, proteins that have had either RRM deleted bind RNA much less efficiently. CPEB that has had the cysteine-histidine region deleted has no detectable capacity to bind RNA. Single alanine substitutions of specific cysteine or histidine residues within this region also abolish RNA binding, pointing to the importance of this highly conserved domain of the protein. Chelation of metal ions by 1,10-phenanthroline inhibits the ability of CPEB to bind RNA; however, RNA binding is restored if the reaction is supplemented with zinc. CPEB also binds other metals such as cobalt and cadmium, but these destroy RNA binding. These data indicate that the RRMs and a zinc finger region of CPEB are essential for RNA binding.     

Selections for constituting new RNA-protein interactions in catalytic RNP

In vitro and in vivo selection techniques are developed to constitute new RNA–peptide interactions. The selection strategy is designed by employing a catalytic RNP consisting of a derivative of the Tetrahymena ribozyme and an artificial RNA-binding protein. An arginine-rich RNA-binding motif and its target RNA motif in the RNP are substituted with randomized sequences and used for the selection experiments. Previously unknown binding motifs are obtained and the newly established interactions have been indispensable for assembling a catalytically active RNP. The method employed in this study is useful for making customized self-splicing intron RNAs whose activity is regulated by protein cofactors.