DNA-Binding and Photocleavage Properties of Ru(II) Polypyridyl Complexes with DNA and Their Toxicity Studies on Eukaryotic Microorganisms

Four Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes, [Ru(bpy)₂(7-NO₂-dppz)]²⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(7-CH₃-dppz)]²⁺, [Ru(phen)₂(7-NO₂-dppz)]²⁺, and [Ru(phen)₂(7-CH₃-dppz)]²⁺ (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, phen = 1,10-phenanthroline), (7-Nitro-dppz = 7-Nitro dipyrido[3,2-a:2′-3′-c]phenazine, 7-CH₃-dppz = 7-Methyl dipyrido[3,2-a:2′-3′-c]phenazine), have been synthesized and characterized by IR, UV, elemental analysis, ¹H NMR, ¹³C-NMR, and mass spectroscopy. The DNA-binding properties of the four complexes were investigated by spectroscopic and viscosity measurements. The results suggest that all four complexes bind to DNA via an intercalative mode. Under irradiation at 365 nm, all four complexes were found to promote the photocleavage of plasmid pBR 322 DNA. Toxicological effects of the selected complexes were performed on industrially important yeasts (eukaryotic microorganisms).     

Strong and weak coupling in mixed-valence complexes bridged by 4,4′-azo-di(phenylcyanamido)

The complexes [{Ru(tpy^∗)(bpy)}₂(μ-adpc)][PF₆]₂ where tpy^∗ is 4,4′,4″-tri-(tert-butyl)-2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine, bpy is 2,2′-bipyridine, and adpc²⁻ is 4,4′-azo-diphenylcyanamide dianion and trans,trans-[{Ru(tpy^∗)(pc)}₂(μ-adpc)] where pc⁻ is 2-pyrazine-carboxylato were prepared and characterized by cyclic voltammetry and spectroelectrochemical methods. Intervalence band properties and IR spectroelectrochemistry of the mixed-valence complexes [{Ru(tpy^∗)(bpy)}₂(μ-adpc)]³⁺ and trans,trans-[{Ru(tpy^∗)(pc)}₂(μ-adpc)]⁺ are consistent with delocalized and valence-trapped mixed-valence properties respectively. The reduction in mixed-valence coupling upon substituting a bipyridine ligand with 2-pyrazine carboxylato strongly suggests that hole-transfer superexchange is the dominant mechanism for metal-metal coupling in these complexes.     

Synthesis, characterization and electrode adsorption studies of porphyrins coordinated to ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes

Two new porphyrins, meso-tris-3,4-dimethoxyphenyl-mono-(4-pyridyl)porphyrin (H₂MPy3,4DMPP) and meso-tris-3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl-mono-(4-pyridyl)porphyrin (H₂MPy3M4HPP), and their ruthenium analogs obtained by coordination of [Ru(bpy)₂Cl]⁺ groups (where bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) to the pyridyl nitrogens have been synthesized and studied by electronic absorption spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry and spectroelectrochemistry. These ruthenated porphyrins couple Ru chromophores to porphyrins containing electroactive meso-substituents. The highest energy electronic absorption for the ruthenated complexes is assigned as a bpy(π) → bpy(π*) intraligand charge transfer while the next lowest energy electronic absorption is assigned as Ru(dπ) → bpy(π*) metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) transition. The Ru^III/II couples occur at approximately 0.95 V versus the SHE reference electrode in acetonitrile solutions. The first oxidation of the porphyrin is localized on the 3,4-dimethoxyphenyl and 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl substituents, respectively. Electroactive surfaces result from adsorption of these compounds onto glassy carbon electrodes followed by anodic cycling in acidic media.     

Mixed-ligand complexes of ruthenium(II) containing new photoactive or electroactive ligands: synthesis, spectral characterization and DNA interactions

Mixed-ligand ruthenium(II) complexes of three photoactive ligands, viz., (E)-1-[2-(4-methyl-2-pyridyl)-4-pyridyl]-2-(1-naphthyl)-1-ethene (mppne), (E)-1-(9-anthryl)-2-[2-(4-methyl-2-pyridyl)-4-pyridyl]-1-ethene (mppae) and (E)-1-[2-(4-methyl-2-pyridyl)-4-pyridyl]-2-(1-pyrenyl)-1-ethene (mpppe), in which a 2,2′-bipyridyl unit is linked via an ethylinic linkage to either a naphthalene, an anthracene or a pyrene chromophore and three electroactive ligands, viz., 4-(4-pyridyl)-1,2-benzenediol (catpy), 5,6-dihydroxy-1,10-phenanthroline (catphen) and 1,2-benzenediol (cat), were synthesized in good to moderate yields. Complexes [Ru(bpy)₂(mppne)]²⁺ (bpy is 2, 2′–bipyridyl), [Ru(bpy)₂(mppae)]²⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(mpppe)]²⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(sq-py)]⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(sq-phen)]⁺ and [Ru(phen)₂(bsq)]⁺ (phen is 1,10-phenanthroline) were fully characterized by elemental analysis, IR, ¹H NMR, fast-atom bombardment or electron-impact mass, UV–vis and cyclic voltammetric methods. In the latter three complexes, the ligands catpy, catphen and cat are actually bound to the metal center as the corresponding semiquinone species, viz., 4-(4-pyridyl)-1,2-benzenedioleto(+I) (sq-py), 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dioleto(+I) (sq-phen) and 1,2-benzenedioleto(+I) (bsq), thus making the overall charge of the complexes formally equal to + 1 in each case. These three complexes are electron paramagnetic resonance active and exhibit an intense absorption band between 941 and 958 nm owing to metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT, d _Ru→π*_sq) transitions. The other three ruthenium(II) complexes containing three photoactive ligands, mppne, mppae and mpppe, exhibit MLCT (d _Ru→π*_bpy ) bands in the 454–461-nm region and are diamagnetic. These can be characterized by the ¹H NMR method. [Ru(bpy)₂(mppne)]²⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(mppae)]²⁺ and [Ru(bpy)₂(mpppe)]²⁺ exhibit redox waves corresponding to the Ru^III/Ru^II couple along with the expected ligand (bpy and substituted bpy) based ones in their cyclic and differential pulse voltammograms (CH₃CN, 0.1 M tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate)—corresponding voltammograms of [Ru(bpy)₂(sq-py)]⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(sq-phen)]⁺ and [Ru(phen)₂(bsq)]⁺ are mainly characterized by waves corresponding to the quinone/semiquinone (q/sq) and semiquinone/1,2-diol (sq/cat) redox processes. The results of absorption and fluorescence titration as well as thermal denaturation studies reveal that [Ru(bpy)₂(mppne)]²⁺ and [Ru(bpy)₂(mppae)]²⁺ are moderate-to-strong binders of calf thymus DNA with binding constants ranging from 10⁵ to 10⁶ M⁻¹. Under the identical conditions of drug and light dose, the DNA (supercoiled pBR 322) photocleavage activities of these two complexes follow the order:[Ru(bpy)₂(mppne)]²⁺>[Ru(bpy)₂(mppae)]²⁺, although the emission quantum yields follow the reverse order. The other ruthenium(II) complexes containing the semiquinone-based ligands are found to be nonluminescent and inefficient photocleavage agents of DNA. However, experiments shows that [Ru(bpy)₂(sq)]⁺-based complexes oxidize the sugar unit and could be used as mild oxidants for the sugar moiety of DNA. Possible explanations for these observations are presented.Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available for this article at .     

Synthesis and characterization of Pt(II) and Pt(II)/Ru(II) complexes with the bidentate bridging ligand dipyrido(2,3-a:3′,2′-h)phenazine (dpop)

Three new complexes [Pt(dpop)(Cl)₂], [(Cl)₂Pt(dpop)Pt(Cl)₂] and [(bpy)₂Ru(dpop)Pt(Cl)₂](PF₆)₂ (dpop = dipyrido(2,3-a:3′,2′-h)phenazine) were prepared and studied. The electronic absorption spectra of the complexes display Pt dπ → dpop π* and Ru dπ → dpop π* MLCT transitions at longer wavelengths than for previously reported similar complexes. Results of cyclic voltammograms show reversible dpop centered reductions while for the mixed metal [(bpy)₂Ru(dpop)Pt(Cl)₂]²⁺ an irreversible Pt(II) oxidative wave precedes the Ru(II) oxidation/reduction couple. Spectroelectrochemical results show that all oxidative and reductive processes are completely reversible. The [(Cl)₂Pt(dpop)Pt(Cl)₂] complex cleaves in solution with pseudo-first order kinetics resulting in loss of the Pt dπ → dpop π* MLCT transition at 545 nm.     

Electronic Effect of Substituents on the DNA Intercalation of Ruthenium(II)?Polypyridyl Complexes

Five ruthenium(II) complexes, i.e., [Ru(bpy)₂(TIP)]²⁺ (bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine; TIP=2‐thiophenimidazo[4,5‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline; 1 ), [Ru(bpy)₂(5‐NTIP)]²⁺ (5‐NTIP=2‐(5‐nitrothiophen)imidazo[4,5‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline; 2 ), [Ru(bpy)₂(5‐MOTIP)]²⁺ (5‐MOTIP=2‐(5‐methoxythiophen)imidazo[4,5‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline; 3 ), [Ru(bpy)₂(5‐BTIP)]²⁺ (5‐BTIP=2‐(5‐bromothiophen)imidazo[4,5‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline; 4 ), and [Ru(bpy)₂(4‐BTIP)]²⁺ (4‐BTIP=2‐(4‐bromothiophen)imidazo[4,5‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline; 5 ), were synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis and UV/VIS, IR, and ¹H‐NMR spectroscopic methods. The photophysical and DNA‐binding properties were investigated by means of UV and fluorescence spectroscopic methods and viscosity measurements, respectively. The results suggest that all five complexes can bind to CT‐DNA with various binding strength. Complexes 2 and 3 showed the strongest and the weakest binding affinity, respectively, among these five complexes. Due to the substituent position of the Br‐atom in the ligand, complex 5 interacted stronger with CT‐DNA than complex 4 . The binding affinities of the complexes decreased in the order 2, 5, 4, 1 , and 3 .     

Diastereoisomerically pure pyrazole-3,5-dicarboxylate-bridged dinuclear ruthenium(II) and osmium(II) complexes of 2,2-bipyridine: structural, electrochemical and spectral studies

Pyrazole-3,5-dicarboxylate-bridged dinuclear ruthenium(II) and osmium(II) complexes of 2,2^′-bipyridine of composition [(bpy)₂Ru(pzdc)Ru(bpy)₂](ClO₄) · H₂O (1) and [(bpy)₂Os(pzdc)Os(bpy)₂](ClO₄) · H₂O (2) have been obtained in high yield and have been separated to their homochiral (ΛΛ/ΔΔ) rac (1a, 2a) and heterochiral (ΛΔ/ΔΛ) meso (1b, 2b) diastereoisomers. The distinctive structural features of these diastereoisomers have been characterized by 1-D and 2-D ¹H NMR spectroscopy. The X-ray crystal structure of rac-[(bpy)₂Os(pzdc)Os(bpy)₂](ClO₄) · H₂O (2a) has been determined. The electrochemical and electronic spectral studies have established that there remain difference in properties and hence difference in intermetallic communication between the diastereoisomeric forms in each case.     

Synthesis and properties of red emitter Ru(II) complexes based on 6,6′-disubstituted-4,4′-bipyrimidine

Heteroleptic complexes [Ru(bpy)₂(R₂bpm)]²⁺, where bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine and R₂bpm = 6,6′-diaryl-4,4′-bipyrimidine, have been synthesized and characterized, together with the homoleptic complex [Ru(R₂bpm)₃]²⁺, in which R₂bpm = 6,6′-diphenyl-4,4′-bipyrimidine. The substituent aryl on the bipyrimidine has significant effects on the properties of these complexes as compared to the parent [Ru(bpy)₂(bpm)]²⁺ complex. The complexes exhibit Ru-to-bpm charge transfer (CT) absorptions centered at about 540 nm and Ru-to-bpy CT absorptions centered at about 435 nm. The assignment of the low energy absorptions is supported by the relative ease of the reduction of the new complexes as compared to [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺. The new complexes exhibit a relatively intense emission at room temperature, with lifetimes in the 10-50 ns range, with the homoleptic species exhibiting the higher-energy (maximum at 724 nm) and the longest-lived (τ = 48 ns) emission among the complexes. Luminescence lifetimes and quantum yields are governed by the energy gap law, indicating that direct deactivation to the ground state is the dominant relaxation pathway for 1-6, while thermally activated processes are inefficient.     

X-ray structure, redox and spectroscopic properties of ruthenium phosphine complexes [Ru(tpy)(bpy)(PPh3)] and [Ru(tpy)(bpy)(PCy3)]

The synthesis and crystal structures of two new phosphine ruthenium polypyridine complexes [Ru(tpy)(bpy)(PR₃)]²⁺ with R = Ph (1), Cy (2) are reported. Their geometrical parameters are intimately related to the electronic and steric properties of the phosphine ligand. Electrochemical and UV-Vis analyses showed the influence of the substituents of the coordinated phosphorus atom on the Ru^III/Ru^II potential and on the frontier orbitals energy gap. The results are discussed in terms of steric effects and net donor power of the phosphine ligands.     

Targeting topoisomerase II with the chiral DNA-intercalating ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes

Many antitumor drugs act as topoisomerase inhibitors, and the inhibitions are usually related to DNA binding. Here we designed and synthesized DNA-intercalating Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes Δ--[Ru(bpy)₂(uip)]²⁺ and Λ-[Ru(bpy)₂(uip)]²⁺ (bpy is 2,2′-bipyridyl, uip is 2-(5-uracil)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline). The DNA binding, photocleavage, topoisomerase inhibition, and cytotoxicity of the complexes were studied. As we expected, the synthesized Ru(II) complexes can intercalate into DNA base pairs and cleave the pBR322 DNA with high activity upon irradiation. The mechanism studies reveal that singlet oxygen (¹O₂) and superoxide anion radical (O₂^•−) may play an important role in the photocleavage. The inhibition of topoisomerases I and II by the Ru(II) complexes has been studied. The results suggest that both complexes are efficient inhibitors towards topoisomerase II by interference with the DNA religation and direct topoisomerase II binding. Both complexes show antitumor activity towards HELA, hepG2, BEL-7402, and CNE-1 tumor cells. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Two star‐shaped tetranuclear Ru(II) complexes containing uncoordinated imidazole groups: synthesis,characterization, photophysical and pH sensing properties

Tetrapodal ligands H₄L¹ and H₄L² containing imidazole groups have been synthesized by the reaction of 1,10‐phenanthroline‐5,6‐dione with 1,2,4,5‐tetrakis[(4‐formylphenoxy)methyl]benzene and 1,2,4,5‐tetrakis[(3‐formylphenoxy)methyl]benzene, respectively, in presence of NH₄OAc. Two star‐shaped complexes [{Ru(bpy)₂}₄(μ₄‐H₄L¹)](PF₆)₈ and [{Ru(bpy)₂}₄(μ₄‐H₄L²)](PF₆)₈ (bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridine) have been prepared by refluxing Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂·2H₂O and each ligand in ethylene glycol. The deprotonated complexes [{Ru(bpy)₂}₄(μ₄‐L¹)](PF₆)₄ and [{Ru(bpy)₂}₄(μ₄‐L²)](PF₆)₄ have been obtained by the reaction of sodium methoxide with [{Ru(bpy)₂}₄(μ₄‐H₄L¹)](PF₆)₈ and [{Ru(bpy)₂}₄(μ₄‐H₄L²)](PF₆)₈, respectively, in methanol. The pH effects on the UV–vis light absorption and emission spectra of both complexes have been studied, and ground‐ and excited‐state ionization constants of both complexes have been derived. The photophysical properties of both complexes are strongly dependent on the solution pH. They act as proton‐induced off–on–off luminescent sensors through two successive deprotonation processes of imidazole groups, with a maximum on–off ratio of 8 in buffer solution at room temperature. Theoretical calculations for the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest occupied molecular orbital (LOMO) orbitals of bridging ligand are also presented for plausible explanations of the fluorescence changes. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Experimental and DFT studies on the DNA-binding trend and spectral properties of complexes [Ru(bpy)2L] (L = dmdpq, dpq, and dcdpq)

The trend in DNA-binding affinities and the spectral properties of a series of Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes, [Ru(bpy)₂(dmdpq)]²⁺ (1), [Ru(bpy)₂(dpq)]²⁺ (2), [Ru(bpy)₂(cndpq)]²⁺ (3) (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine; dpq = dipyrido[3,2-d:2′,3′-f]quinoxaline; dmdpq = di-methyl-dpq; dcdpq = di-cyano-dpq), have been experimentally and theoretically investigated. The DNA-binding constants K_b of the complexes were determined systematically with spectrophotometric titration. The density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TDDFT) calculations were carried out for these complexes. The experimental results show that these complexes bind to DNA in intercalation mode, and the order of their intrinsic DNA-binding constants K_b is K_b(1) < K_b(2) ? K_b(3). The substituents on the intercalative ligands of the complexes play a very important role in the control of DNA-binding affinities of the complexes, in particular, the stronger electron-withdrawing substituent (-CN) on the intercalative ligand can greatly improve the DNA-binding property of the derivative complex. The trend in DNA-binding affinities as well as the spectral properties of metal-ligand charge-transition (¹MLCT) of this series of complexes can be reasonably explained by applying the DFT and TDDFT calculations and the frontier molecular orbital theory.     

Mixed ligand ruthenium(II) complexes of 5,6-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline: The role of ligand hydrophobicity on DNA binding of the complexes

A series of mixed ligand Ru(II) complexes of 5,6-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline (5,6-dmp) as primary ligand and 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy), pyridine (py) and NH₃ as co-ligands have been prepared and characterized by X-ray crystallography, elemental analysis and ¹H NMR and electronic absorption spectroscopy. The X-ray crystal structure of the complex [Ru(phen)₂(bpy)]Cl₂ reveals a distorted octahedral coordination geometry for the RuN₆ coordination sphere. The DNA binding constants obtained from the absorption spectral titrations decrease in the order, tris(5,6-dmp)Ru(II) > bis(5,6-dmp)Ru(II) > mono(5,6-dmp)Ru(II), which is consistent with the trend in apparent emission enhancement of the complexes on binding to DNA. These observations reveal that the DNA binding affinity of the complexes depend upon the number of 5,6-dmp ligands and hence the hydrophobic interaction of 5,6-dimethyl groups on the DNA surface, which is critical in determining the DNA binding affinity and the solvent accessibility of the exciplex. Among the bis(5,6-dmp)Ru(II) complexes, those with monodentate py (4) or NH₃ (5) co-ligands show DNA binding affinities slightly higher than the bpy and phen analogues. This reveals that they interact with DNA through the co-ligands while both the 5,6-dmp ligands interact with the exterior of the DNA surface. All these observations are supported by thermal denaturation and viscosity measurements. Two DNA binding modes - surface/electrostatic and strong hydrophobic/partial intercalative DNA interaction - are suggested for the mixed ligand complexes on the basis of time-resolved emission measurements. Interestingly, the 5,6-dmp ligands promote aggregation of the complexes on the DNA helix as a helical nanotemplate, as evidenced by induced CD signals in the UV region. The ionic strength variation experiments and competitive DNA binding studies on bis(5,6-dmp)Ru(II) complexes reveal that EthBr and the partially intercalated and kinetically inert [Ru(phen)₂(dppz)]²⁺ (dppz = dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine) complexes revert the CD signals induced by exciton coupling of the DNA-bound complexes with the free complexes in solution.     

Synthesis and characterisation of bis(2,2′-bipyridine)(4-carboxy-4′-(pyrid-2-ylmethylamido)-2,2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) di(hexafluorophosphate): Comparison of spectroelectrochemical properties with related complexes

The new complex, [Ru^II(bpy)₂(4-HCOO-4′-pyCH₂ NHCO-bpy)](PF₆)₂ · 3H₂O (1), where 4-HCOO-4′-pyCH₂NHCO-bpy is 4-(carboxylic acid)-4′-pyrid-2-ylmethylamido-2,2′-bipyridine, has been synthesised from [Ru(bpy)₂(H₂dcbpy)](PF₆)₂ (H₂dcbpy is 4,4′-(dicarboxylic acid)-2,2′-bipyridine) and characterised by elemental analysis and spectroscopic methods. An X-ray crystal structure determination of the trihydrate of the [Ru(bpy)₂(H₂dcbpy)](PF₆)₂ precursor is reported, since it represented a different solvate to an existing structure. The structure shows a distorted octahedral arrangement of the ligands around the ruthenium(II) centre and is consistent with the carboxyl groups being protonated. A comparative study of the electrochemical and photophysical properties of [Ru^II(bpy)₂(4-HCOO-4′-pyCH₂NHCO-bpy)]²⁺ (1), [Ru(bpy)₂(H₂dcbpy)]²⁺ (2), [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ (3), [Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂] (4) and [Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂]⁺ (5) was then undertaken to determine their variation upon changing the ligands occupying two of the six ruthenium(II) coordination sites. The ruthenium(II) complexes exhibit intense ligand centred (LC) transition bands in the UV region, and broad MLCT bands in the visible region. The ruthenium(III) complex, 5, displayed overlapping LC bands in the UV region and a LMCT band in the visible. 1, 2 and 3 were found, via cyclic voltammetry at a glassy carbon electrode, to exhibit very positive reversible formal potentials of 996, 992 and 893 mV (versus Fc/Fc⁺) respectively for the Ru(III)/Ru(II) half-cell reaction. As expected the reversible potential derived from oxidation of 4 (−77 mV (versus Fc/Fc⁺)) was in excellent agreement with that found via reduction of 5 (−84 mV (versus Fc/Fc⁺)). Spectroelectrochemical experiments in an optically transparent thin-layer electrochemical cell configuration allowed UV-Vis spectra of the Ru(III) redox state to be obtained for 1, 2, 3 and 4 and also confirmed that 5 was the product of oxidative bulk electrolysis of 4. These spectrochemical measurements also confirmed that the oxidation of all Ru(II) complexes and reduction of the corresponding Ru(III) complex are fully reversible in both the chemical and electrochemical senses.     

Syntheses, characterization and DNA binding of mono- and diruthenium(II) complexes containing 2,2′-bis(1,2,4-triazino[5,6-f]phenanthren-3-yl)-4,4′-bipyridine and 2,2′-bipyridine ligands

A novel bridging ligand 2,2′-bis(1,2,4-triazino[5,6-f]phenanthren-3-yl)-4,4′-bipyridine (btpb) and its mononuclear ruthenium(II) complex [Ru(bpy)₂(btpb)]²⁺ (Rubtpb; bpy = 2,2′-bipyridyl) and dinuclear ruthenium(II) complex [Ru(bpy)₂(btpb)Ru(bpy)₂]⁴⁺ (Ru₂btpb) have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analyses, fast atom bombardment or electrospray mass spectra, ¹H NMR, and electronic spectroscopy. Binding behaviors of the mono- and dinuclear complexes with calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA) have been investigated by absorption spectra, viscosity measurements, and equilibrium dialysis experiments. As the concentration of DNA is increased, the electronic absorption spectra bands at the metal-ligand charge transfer of the mononuclear complex Rubtpb at 501.0 nm exhibit hypochromism of about 17.4% and bathochromism of 2.0 nm, the dinuclear complex Ru₂btpb at 511.0 nm exhibits hypochromism of about 24.8% and bathochromism of 1.0 nm. The increasing amounts of the complexes on the relative viscosities of CT-DNA are much smaller than that of the classic intercalators. The experiments suggest that the Rubtpb and Ru₂btpb may be bound to DNA by non-intercalating binder.     

Electronic effects on the interactions of complexes [Ru(phen)2(p-L)] (L=MOPIP, HPIP, and NPIP) with DNA

In order to explore the electronic effects of Ru(II) complexes binding to DNA, a series of Ru(II) complexes [Ru(phen)₂ (p-MOPIP)]²⁺ (1), [Ru(phen)₂ (p-HPIP)]²⁺ (2), and [Ru(phen)₂(p-NPIP)]²⁺ (3) were synthesized and characterized by elementary, ¹H NMR, and ES-MS analysis. The binding properties of these complexes to CT-DNA were investigated with spectroscopic methods and viscosity experiments. Furthermore, the computations for these complexes applying the density functional theory (DFT) method have also been performed. The results show that all of these complexes can well bind to DNA in intercalation mode and DNA-binding affinity of these complexes is greatly influenced by electronic effects of intercalating ligands. The intrinsic binding constants for 1, 2, and 3 are 0.20, 0.69, and 1.56 × 10⁵ M⁻¹, respectively. This order is in accordance with that of the electron-withdrawing ability of substituent [-OR < -OH < -NO₂]. Such a trend in electronic effects of Ru(II) complexes binding to DNA can be reasonably explained by the DFT calculations.     

Non-adiabatic electronic energy transfer from the (3CTRu(bpy)2(CN)2 excited state to Cr(III) complexes

The quenching of the luminescence lifetime of cis-Ru(bpy)₂(CN)₂ (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) by complexes of the cis- and trans-Cr(en)₂(XY)⁺ families (en = ethylenediamine; X and Y = F, Cl, Br, NCS, ONO) has been studied in aqueous solution and the results obtained have been discussed together with those previously reported for the quenching of the Ru(bpy)₃²⁺ luminescene by the same Cr(III) complexes. Experimental results and theoretical considerations show that the quenching process occurs by exchange electronic energy transfer. Since in all cases the process is sufficiently exoergonic to make up for the small intrinsic barriers, the lowest diffusion values of the quenching constants indicate a non-adiabatic behavior. The degree of adiabaticity of the energy transfer process is larger for the neutral Ru(bpy)₂(CN)₂ donor than for the positively charged Ru(bpy)₃²⁺ donor. The X and Y ligands can be ordered in the following adiabaticity series: ONO^?, F^? < Cl^? <NCS^? <Br^?. The geometry of the acceptor is a discriminating parameter only for energy transfer from the charged donor. These results show that the electronic term of exchange energy transfer in non-adiabatic processess is governed by a delicate balance of factors related to the composition and structure of the encounter complex [1].     

Ruthenium(II) complexes containing asymmetric 2-(pyrazin-2-yl)naphthoimidazole: syntheses, characterization, DNA-binding and photocleavage studies

A novel asymmetric bidentate ligand, 2-(pyrazin-2-yl)naphthoimidazole (PZNI), and its Ru(II) complexes [Ru(bpy)₂(PZNI)]²⁺ (1) and [Ru(phen)₂(PZNI)]²⁺ (2) have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, mass spectra, ¹H NMR, and electronic spectroscopy. The electrochemical behaviors of the novel complexes were studied by cyclic voltammetry. The DNA-binding properties of the complexes were investigated by spectroscopic methods and viscosity measurements. The experimental results indicate that the complexes 1 and 2 interact with calf thymus DNA by intercalative mode via the terminal naphthyl ring into the base pairs of DNA. The two Ru(II) complexes have also been found to promote the cleavage of plasmid pBR 322 DNA from the supercoiled form I to the open circular form II upon irradiation.     

Variation of DNA photocleavage efficiency for [(TL)2Ru(dpp)]Cl2 complexes where TL = 2,2′-bipyridine, 1,10-phenanthroline, or 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline

The complexes [(bpy)₂Ru(dpp)]Cl₂, [(phen)₂Ru(dpp)]Cl₂, and [(Ph₂phen)₂Ru(dpp)]Cl₂ (where dpp = 2,3-bis(2-pyridyl)pyrazine, bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, phen = 1,10-phenanthroline, Ph₂phen = 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline) have been investigated and found to photocleave DNA via an oxygen-mediated pathway. These light absorbing complexes possess intense metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) transitions in the visible region of the spectrum. The [(TL)₂Ru(dpp)]²⁺ systems populate ³MLCT states after visible light excitation, giving rise to emissions in aqueous solution centered at 692, 690, and 698 nm for TL = bpy, phen, and Ph₂phen respectively. The ³MLCT states and emissions are quenched by O₂, producing a reactive oxygen species. These complexes photocleave DNA with varying efficiencies, [(Ph₂phen)₂Ru(dpp)]²⁺ > [(phen)₂Ru(dpp)]²⁺ > [(bpy)₂Ru(dpp)]²⁺. The presence of the polyazine bridging ligand will allow these chromophores to be incorporated into larger supramolecular assemblies.     

Synthesis and properties of electrochemiluminescent dinuclear Ru(II) complexes assembled with ester-bridged bis(bipyridine) ligands

New bridging ligands, such as bpy-(COOCH₂)-bpy (BL1), mbpy-(CH₂)₃COOCH₂-bpy (BL2), bpy-COO(CH₂)₆OOC-bpy (BL3), and bpy-COOCH₂PhPhCH₂OOC-bpy (BL4), have been synthesized and coordinated to [RuL₂(acetone)₂](PF₆)₂ for various [Ru(L)₂(BL)Ru(L)₂](PF₆)₄-type dinuclear ruthenium complexes (where BL = BL1, BL2, BL3, BL4, and L = bpy, o-phen, DTDP). Their electrochemical redox potentials, spectroscopic properties and relative electrochemiluminescence were investigated in detail. All dinuclear Ru complexes exhibit MLCT (metal-to-ligand charge transfer) absorption and luminescence bands in the visible region. ECL intensities of dinuclear ruthenium(II) complexes were affected not only by the kind of the ligand, but also by the nature of the bridging ligand. Among the synthesized dinuclear Ru complexes, [(DTDP)₂Ru(mbpy)-(CH₂)₃COOCH₂-(bpy)Ru(DTDP)₂](PF₆)₄ exhibited enhanced ECL intensities as high as 2.9 times greater than that of the reference, [Ru(o-phen)₃](PF₆)₂.