Adhesion-dependent cell cycle progression linked to the expression of cyclin D1, activation of cyclin E-cdk2, and phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein

Growth factors and cell anchorage jointly regulate transit through G1 in almost all cell types, but the cell cycle basis for this combined requirement remains largely uncharacterized. We show here that cell adhesion and growth factors jointly regulate the cyclin D1- and E- dependent kinases. Adhesion to substratum regulates both the induction and translation of cyclin D1 mRNA. Nonadherent cells fail to phosphorylate the retinoblastoma protein (Rb), and enforced expression of cyclin D1 rescues Rb phosphorylation and entry into S phase when G1 cells are cultured in the absence of substratum. Nonadherent cells also fail to activate the cyclin E-associated kinase, and this effect can be linked to an increased association of the cdk inhibitors, p21 and p27. These data describe a striking convergence in the cell cycle controls used by the two major signal transduction systems responsible for normal and abnormal cell growth. Taken together with our previous studies showing adhesion-dependent expression of cyclin A, they also establish the cell cycle basis for explaining the combined requirement for growth factors and the extracellular matrix in transit through the Rb checkpoint, entry into S phase, and anchorage-dependent growth.     

A unified view of the DNA-damage checkpoint

Recent investigation of the DNA-damage checkpoint in several organisms has highlighted the conservation of this pathway. The checkpoint's signal transduction pathway consists of four conserved classes of molecules: two large protein kinases having homology to phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases, three "sensor" proteins with homology to proliferating cell nuclear antigen, two serine/threonine (S/T) kinases, and two adaptors for the S/T kinases. This review compares the role of these four classes of checkpoint proteins in humans and model organisms.     

Triggering the cell cycle in plants

In essence, the mitotic cell cycle in eukaryotes involves the duplication and separation of chromosomes, coupled to the process of dividing one cell into two. Cytokinesis is therefore the culmination of a series of events that were triggered during G1 phase, and brings the daughter cells back to the starting position in G1 for another possible round of division. In all eukaryotes, progression through the cell cycle is controlled by cyclin-dependent kinases that bind to positive regulators called cyclins. This review explores some of the pathways that trigger the plant cell cycle, with emphasis on the G1 phase. Examples include signalling pathways involving glutathione and cellular redox potential, the possible existence of a G1 DNA-damage checkpoint, and the plant hormones auxin and cytokinin. Progress in understanding the link between cell proliferation, cell differentiation and the cell-cycle machinery in a developmental context is discussed.     

Beta-catenin regulation during the cell cycle: implications in G2/M and apoptosis

Beta-catenin is a multifunctional protein involved in cell-cell adhesion and Wnt signal transduction. Beta-catenin signaling has been proposed to act as inducer of cell proliferation in different tumors. However, in some developmental contexts and cell systems beta-catenin also acts as a positive modulator of apoptosis. To get additional insights into the role of beta-catenin in the regulation of the cell cycle and apoptosis, we have analyzed the levels and subcellular localization of endogenous beta-catenin and its relation with adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) during the cell cycle in S-phase-synchronized epithelial cells. Beta-catenin levels increase in S phase, reaching maximum accumulation at late G2/M and then abruptly decreasing as the cells enter into a new G1 phase. In parallel, an increased cytoplasmic and nuclear localization of beta-catenin and APC is observed during S and G2 phases. In addition, strong colocalization of APC with centrosomes, but not beta-catenin, is detected in M phase. Interestingly, overexpression of a stable form of beta-catenin, or inhibition of endogenous beta-catenin degradation, in epidermal keratinocyte cells induces a G2 cell cycle arrest and leads to apoptosis. These results support a role for beta-catenin in the control of cell cycle and apoptosis at G2/M in normal and transformed epidermal keratinocytes.     

Low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity: a consequence of ineffective cell cycle arrest of radiation-damaged G2-phase cells

This review highlights the phenomenon of low-dose hyper- radiosensitivity (HRS), an effect in which cells die from excessive sensitivity to small single doses of ionizing radiation but become more resistant (per unit dose) to larger single doses. Established and new data pertaining to HRS are discussed with respect to its possible underlying molecular mechanisms. To explain HRS, a three-component model is proposed that consists of damage recognition, signal transduction and damage repair. The foundation of the model is a rapidly occurring dose-dependent pre-mitotic cell cycle checkpoint that is specific to cells irradiated in the G2phase. This checkpoint exhibits a dose expression profile that is identical to the cell survival pattern that characterizes HRS and is probably the key control element of low-dose radiosensitivity. This premise is strengthened by the recent observation coupling low- dose radiosensitivity of G2-phase cells directly to HRS. The putative role of known damage response factors such as ATM, PARP, H2AX, 53BP1 and HDAC4 is also included within the framework of the HRS model.     

The G2-phase DNA-damage checkpoint

DNA damage causes cell-cycle delay before S phase, during replication and before mitosis. This involves a number of highly conserved proteins that sense DNA damage and signal the cell-cycle machinery. Kinases that were initially discovered in yeast model systems have recently been shown to regulate the regulators of cyclin-dependent kinases and to control the stability of p53. This shows the importance of checkpoint proteins for maintaining genome stability. Here, we discuss recent data from yeast and metazoans that suggest a remarkable conservation of the organization of the G2 DNA-damage checkpoint pathway.     

Caffeine inhibits the checkpoint kinase ATM.

The basis of many anti-cancer therapies is the use of genotoxic agents that damage DNA and thus kill dividing cells. Agents that cause cells to override the DNA-damage checkpoint are predicted to sensitize cells to killing by genotoxic agents. They have therefore been sought as adjuncts in radiation therapy and chemotherapy. One such compound, caffeine, uncouples cell-cycle progression from the replication and repair of DNA [1] [2]. Caffeine therefore servers as a model compound in establishing the principle that agents that override DNA-damage checkpoints can be used to sensitize cells to the killing effects of genotoxic drugs [3]. But despite more than 20 years of use, the molecular mechanisms by which caffeine affects the cell cycle and checkpoint responses have not been identified. We investigated the effects of caffeine on the G2/M DNA-damage checkpoint in human cells. We report that the radiation-induced activation of the kinase Cds1 [4] (also known as Chk2 [5]) is inhibited by caffeine in vivo and that ATM kinase activity is directly inhibited by caffeine in vitro. Inhibition of ATM provides a molecular explanation of the attenuation of DNA-damage checkpoint responses and for the increased radiosensitivity of caffeine-treated cells [6] [7] [8].     

Computational experiments reveal the efficacy of targeting CDK2 and CKIs for significantly lowering cellular senescence bar for potential cancer treatment

Lowering the threshold of cellular senescence, the process employed by cells to thwart abnormal cell proliferation, though inhibition of CDK2 or Skp2 (regulator of CDK inhibitors) has been recently suggested as a potential avenue for cancer treatment. In this study, we employ a published mathematical model of G1/S transition involving the DNA-damage signal transduction pathway to conduct carefully constructed computational experiments to highlight the effectiveness of manipulating cellular senescence in inhibiting damaged cell proliferation. We first demonstrate the suitability of the mathematical model to explore senescence by highlighting the overlap between senescence pathways and those involved in G1/S transition and DNA damage signal transduction. We then investigate the effect of CDK2 deficiency on senescence in healthy cells, followed by effectiveness of CDK2 deficiency in triggering senescence in DNA damaged cells. For this, we focus on the behaviour of CycE, whose peak response indicates G1/S transition, for several reduced CDK2 levels in healthy as well as two DNA-damage conditions to calculate the probability (β) or the percentage of CDK2 deficient cells passing G1/S checkpoint ((1 - β) indicates level of senescence). Results show that 50% CDK2 deficiency can cause senescence in all healthy cells in a fairly uniform cell population; whereas, most healthy cells (≈67%) in a heterogeneous population escape senescence. This finding is novel to our study. Under both low- and high-DNA damaged conditions, 50% CDK deficiency can cause 65% increase in senescence in a heterogeneous cell population. Furthermore, the model analyses the relationship between CDK2 and its CKIs (p21, p27) to help search for other effective ways to bring forward cellular senescence. Results show that the degradation rate of p21 and initial concentration of p27 are effective in lowering CDK2 levels to lower the senescence threshold. Specifically, CDK2 and p27 are the most effective in triggering senescence while p21 having a smaller influence. While receiving experimental support, these findings specify in detail the inhibitory effects of CKIs. However, simultaneous variation of CDK2 and CKIs produces a dramatic reduction of damage cells passing the G1/S with CDK2&p27 combination causing senescence in almost all damaged cells. This combined effect of CDK2&CKIs on senescence is a novel contribution in this study. A review of the crucial protein complexes revealed that the concentration of active CycE/CDK2-p that controls cell cycle arrest provides support for the above findings with CycE/CDK2-p undergoing the largest reduction (over 100%) under the combined CDK2&CKI conditions leading to the arrest of most of the damaged cells. Our study thus provides quantitative assessments for the previously published qualitative findings on senescence and highlights new avenues for bringing forward senescence bar.     

Growth regulation of a human mature B cell line, B104, by anti-IgM and anti-IgD antibodies

An EBNA- human B lymphoma cell line, B104, was established. B104 cells express IgD as well as IgM on their surface, which is thought to be a basic characteristic of mature B cells. The growth of B104 cells was inhibited by treatment with a panel of anti-IgM antibodies. Cell cycle analyses revealed that the transition of B104 cells from the G2/M to the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle was markedly inhibited by treatment with anti-IgM antibodies. Progression of B104 cells to the M phase of the cell cycle was found to be suppressed in the presence of anti-IgM antibodies. In contrast, both the entrance of G0/G1 phase cells into the S phase and the progression of S phase cells to the G2/M phase of the cell cycle did not seem to be inhibited significantly by treatment with anti-IgM antibodies. These results indicate that the mechanism of the inhibition of growth of B104 cells by anti-IgM antibodies is blockage of the transition from the G2 to the M phase of the cell cycle. In contrast to anti-IgM antibodies, anti-IgD antibodies could not cause growth inhibition of B104 cells at all. B cell growth factors such as IL-4 and IL-6 had no effect on the inhibition of growth of B104 cells by anti-IgM antibody. IFN-alpha and -beta, which have no B cell growth factor activity, did increase the number of cells that survived the treatment with anti-IgM antibodies. B104 is an excellent experimental model for the study of the mechanism of signal transduction through sIg as well as the functional difference between sIgM and sIgD.     

A role for DNA primase in coupling DNA replication to DNA damage response.

The temperature-sensitive yeast DNA primase mutant pri1-M4 fails to execute an early step of DNA replication and exhibits a dominant, allele-specific sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. pri1-M4 is defective in slowing down the rate of S phase progression and partially delaying the G1-S transition in response to DNA damage. Conversely, the G2 DNA damage response and the S-M checkpoint coupling completion of DNA replication to mitosis are unaffected. The signal transduction pathway leading to Rad53p phosphorylation induced by DNA damage is proficient in pri1-M4, and cell cycle delay caused by Rad53p overexpression is counteracted by the pri1-M4 mutation. Altogether, our results suggest that DNA primase plays an essential role in a subset of the Rad53p-dependent checkpoint pathways controlling cell cycle progression in response to DNA damage.     

Chk2 suppresses the oncogenic potential of DNA replication-associated DNA damage

The Mre11 complex (Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1) and Chk2 have been implicated in the DNA-damage response, an inducible process required for the suppression of malignancy. The Mre11 complex is predominantly required for repair and checkpoint activation in S phase, whereas Chk2 governs apoptosis. We examined the relationship between the Mre11 complex and Chk2 in the DNA-damage response via the establishment of Nbs1(DeltaB/DeltaB) Chk2(-/-) and Mre11(ATLD1/ATLD1) Chk2(-/-) mice. Chk2 deficiency did not modify the checkpoint defects or chromosomal instability of Mre11 complex mutants; however, the double-mutant mice exhibited synergistic defects in DNA-damage-induced p53 regulation and apoptosis. Nbs1(DeltaB/DeltaB) Chk2(-/-) and Mre11(ATLD1/ATLD1) Chk2(-/-) mice were also predisposed to tumors. In contrast, DNA-PKcs-deficient mice, in which G1-specific chromosome breaks are present, did not exhibit synergy with Chk2(-/-) mutants. These data suggest that Chk2 suppresses the oncogenic potential of DNA damage arising during S and G2 phases of the cell cycle.     

Dual cell cycle checkpoints sensitive to chromosome replication and DNA damage in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

In eucaryotic cells chromosomes must be fully replicated and repaired before mitosis begins. Genetic studies indicate that this dependence of mitosis on completion of DNA replication and DNA repair derives from a negative control called a checkpoint which somehow checks for replication and DNA damage and blocks cell entry into mitosis. Here we summarize our current understanding of the genetic components of the cell cycle checkpoint in budding yeast. Mutants were identified and their phase and signal specificity tested primarily through interactions of the arrest-defective mutants with cell division cycle mutants. The results indicate that dual checkpoint controls exist in budding yeast, one control sensitive to inhibition of DNA replication (S-phase checkpoint), and a distinct but overlapping control sensitive to DNA repair (G2 checkpoint). Six genes are required for arrest in G2 phase after DNA damage (RAD9, RAD17, RAD24, MEC1, MEC2, and MEC3), and two of these are also essential for arrest in S phase when DNA replication is blocked (MEC1 and MEC2).     

G2/M checkpoint gene expression in developing germ cells

Cell cycle progression is prevented by signal transduction pathways known as checkpoints which are activated in response to replication interference and DNA damage. We cloned a G2/M cell cycle phase-related checkpoint gene from a neonatal mouse testis cDNA library which was identified as mouse claspin, a proposed adaptor protein for Chk1. As part of a study on germ cell differentiation we examined the expression of the checkpoint gene, Chk1, and claspin at 12.5 and 14.5 days post coitum (dpc) and in the post-natal phase. Chk1 mRNA expression increased from 12.5 to 14.5 dpc in female gonads and was strong in males at both time points. Claspin however, was not detected until 14.5 dpc. This suggests there may be some dissociation of claspin expression from Chk1 in fetal germ cell development. Chk1 and claspin expression was also studied in testis over the first 3 days following birth, when apoptosis regulates germ stem cell number. We modulated checkpoint-related gene expression in testis using the anti-metabolite, 5-fluorouracil, resulting in increased apoptosis and upregulation of Chk1 (P<0.0001) and Cdc2 (P<0.02) mRNA. Although we do not fully understand the role checkpoint gene expression has during mammalian germ cell development this report is the first to show the expression of checkpoint-related genes in early mammalian germ cells.     

A role for homologous recombination proteins in cell cycle regulation

Eukaryotic cells respond to DNA breaks, especially double-stranded breaks (DSBs), by activating the DNA damage response (DDR), which encompasses DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint signaling. The DNA damage signal is transmitted to the checkpoint machinery by a network of specialized DNA damage-recognizing and signal-transducing molecules. However, recent evidence suggests that DNA repair proteins themselves may also directly contribute to the checkpoint control. Here, we investigated the role of homologous recombination (HR) proteins in normal cell cycle regulation in the absence of exogenous DNA damage. For this purpose, we used Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells expressing the Fluorescent ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicators (Fucci). Systematic siRNA-mediated knockdown of HR genes in these cells demonstrated that the lack of several of these factors alters cell cycle distribution, albeit differentially. The knock-down of MDC1, Rad51 and Brca1 caused the cells to arrest in the G2 phase, suggesting that they may be required for the G2/M transition. In contrast, inhibition of the other HR factors, including several Rad51 paralogs and Rad50, led to the arrest in the G1/G0 phase. Moreover, reduced expression of Rad51B, Rad51C, CtIP and Rad50 induced entry into a quiescent G0-like phase. In conclusion, the lack of many HR factors may lead to cell cycle checkpoint activation, even in the absence of exogenous DNA damage, indicating that these proteins may play an essential role both in DNA repair and checkpoint signaling.     

Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints

The DNA damage response pathways involve processes of double-strand break (DSB) repair and cell cycle checkpoint control to prevent or limit entry into S phase or mitosis in the presence of unrepaired damage. Checkpoints can function to permanently remove damaged cells from the actively proliferating population but can also halt the cell cycle temporarily to provide time for the repair of DSBs. Although efficient in their ability to limit genomic instability, checkpoints are not foolproof but carry inherent limitations. Recent work has demonstrated that the G1/S checkpoint is slowly activated and allows cells to enter S phase in the presence of unrepaired DSBs for about 4-6?h post irradiation. During this time, only a slowing but not abolition of S-phase entry is observed. The G2/M checkpoint, in contrast, is quickly activated but only responds to a level of 10-20 DSBs such that cells with a low number of DSBs do not initiate the checkpoint or terminate arrest before repair is complete. Here, we discuss the limitations of these checkpoints in the context of the current knowledge of the factors involved. We suggest that the time needed to fully activate G1/S arrest reflects the existence of a restriction point in G1-phase progression. This point has previously been defined as the point when mitogen starvation fails to prevent cells from entering S phase. However, cells that passed the restriction point can respond to DSBs, albeit with reduced efficiency.     

DNA replication defects, spontaneous DNA damage, and ATM-dependent checkpoint activation in replication protein A-deficient cells

Replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric, single-stranded DNA-binding complex comprised of 70-kDa (RPA1), 32-kDa (RPA2), and 14-kDa (RPA3) subunits that is essential for DNA replication, recombination, and repair in eukaryotes. In addition, recent studies using vertebrate model systems have suggested an important role for RPA in the initiation of cell cycle checkpoints following exposure to DNA replication stress. Specifically, RPA has been implicated in the recruitment and activation of the ATM-Rad3-related protein kinase, ATR, which in conjunction with the related kinase, ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated), transmits checkpoint signals via the phosphorylation of downstream effectors. In this report, we have explored the effects of RPA insufficiency on DNA replication, cell survival, and ATM/ATR-dependent signal transduction in response to genotoxic stress. RNA interference-mediated suppression of RPA1 caused a slowing of S phase progression, G2/M cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis in HeLa cells. RPA-deficient cells demonstrated high levels of spontaneous DNA damage and constitutive activation of ATM, which was responsible for the terminal G2/M arrest phenotype. Surprisingly, we found that neither RPA1 nor RPA2 were essential for the hydroxyurea- or UV-induced phosphorylation of the ATR substrates CHK1 and CREB (cyclic AMP-response element-binding protein). These findings reveal that RPA is required for genomic stability and suggest that activation of ATR can occur through RPA-independent pathways.     

Differential activation of intra-S-phase checkpoint in response to tripchlorolide and its effects on DNA replication

DNA replication is tightly regulated during the S phase of the cell cycle, and the activation of the intra-S-phase checkpoint due to DNA damage usually results in arrest of DNA synthesis. However, the molecular details about the correlation between the checkpoint and regulation of DNA replication are still unclear. To investigate the connections between DNA replication and DNA damage checkpoint, a DNA-damage reagent, tripchlorolide, was applied to CHO (Chinese ovary hamster) cells at early- or middle-stages of the S phase. The early-S-phase treatment with TC signifi-cantly delayed the progression of the S phase and caused the phosphorylation of the Chk 1 checkpoint protein, whereas the middle-S-phase treatment only slightly slowed down the progression of the S phase. Furthermore, the analysis of DNA replication patterns revealed that replication pattern II was greatly prolonged in the cells treated with the drug during the early-S phase, whereas the late-replication patterns of these cells were hardly detected, suggesting that the activation of the intra-S-phase checkpoint inhibits the late-origin firing of DNA replication. We conclude that cells at different stages of the S phase are differentially sensitive to the DNA-damage reagent, and the activation of the intra-S-phase checkpoint blocks the DNA replication progression in the late stage of S phase.