共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
Lilly Y. W. Bourguignon Weiliang Xia Gabriel Wong 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(5):2657-2671
4.
5.
Susan R. Ferrari Jennifer Grubb Douglas K. Bishop 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(18):11766-11770
During homologous recombination, a number of proteins cooperate to catalyze
the loading of recombinases onto single-stranded DNA. Single-stranded
DNA-binding proteins stimulate recombination by coating single-stranded DNA
and keeping it free of secondary structure; however, in order for recombinases
to load on single-stranded-DNA-binding protein-coated DNA, the activity of a
class of proteins known as recombination mediators is required. Mediator
proteins coordinate the handoff of single-stranded DNA from single-stranded
DNA-binding protein to recombinase. Here we show that a complex of Mei5 and
Sae3 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae preferentially binds
single-stranded DNA and relieves the inhibition of the strand assimilation and
DNA binding abilities of the meiotic recombinase Dmc1 imposed by the
single-stranded DNA-binding protein replication protein A. Additionally, we
demonstrate the physical interaction of Mei5-Sae3 with replication protein A.
Our results, together with previous in vivo studies, indicate that
Mei5-Sae3 is a mediator of Dmc1 assembly during meiotic recombination in
S. cerevisiae.During meiosis, recombination between homologous chromosomes ensures proper
segregation into haploid products. Recombination events are initiated by the
formation of double strand breaks
(DSBs)2 in DNA
(1). This is followed by
resection of free DNA ends to yield 3′ single-stranded tails, upon which
recombinase assembles to form nucleoprotein filaments. Following recombinase
assembly, the nucleoprotein filament engages a donor chromatid, searches for
homologous DNA sequences on that chromatid, and promotes strand exchange to
yield a heteroduplex DNA intermediate often referred to as a joint molecule.
Although recombinase alone is capable of promoting homology search and strand
exchange in vitro, genetic and biochemical studies have demonstrated
that normal recombinase function in vivo requires the activity of a
number of accessory factors
(2). These factors enhance the
assembly of nucleoprotein filaments, target capture, homology search, and
dissociation of recombinase from duplex DNA.Most eukaryotes possess two recombinases, both homologues of the
Escherichia coli recombinase RecA: Rad51, which is the major
recombinase in mitotic cells and is also important during meiotic
recombination, and Dmc1, which functions only in meiosis. Dmc1 and Rad51 have
been shown to assemble at DSBs by immunofluorescence and chromatin
immunoprecipitation
(3–6),
and both proteins oligomerize on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) to form
nucleofilaments that catalyze strand invasion
(7–9).A number of biochemical studies have defined the role of accessory factors
in stimulating the activity of Rad51
(10–12).
Replication protein A (RPA), the yeast ssDNA-binding protein (SSB), removes
secondary structure in ssDNA that otherwise prevents formation of fully
functional nucleoprotein filaments
(13). Both Rad52 protein
(11,
12) and the heterodimeric
protein Rad55/Rad57 (14) can
overcome the inhibitory effect of RPA on Rad51 nucleoprotein filament
formation in purified systems, mediating a handoff between RPA and Rad51. It
is thought that the mechanism for the mediator activity of Rad52 involves
Rad52 recognizing and binding to RPA-coated ssDNA, where it provides
nucleation sites for the recruitment of free molecules of Rad51
(15). The tumor suppressor
protein BRCA2 also serves as an assembly factor for Rad51 during mitosis in a
variety of species that encode orthologues of this protein, including mice
(16), corn smut
(17), and humans
(18).The meiosis-specific recombinase Dmc1 is stimulated by a distinct set of
accessory factors. Immunostaining studies suggest that the Rad51 mediators
Rad52 and Rad55/Rad57 are not required for assembly of Dmc1 foci in
vivo, although Rad51 itself promotes Dmc1 foci
(19–21).
More recently, immunostaining and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments
demonstrated a role for the Mei5 and Sae3 proteins of Saccharomyces
cerevisiae in assembly of Dmc1 at sites of DSBs in vivo
(22,
23). Consistent with these
observations, mei5 and sae3 mutants display markedly similar
meiotic defects as compared with dmc1 mutants, including defects in
sporulation, spore viability, crossing over, DSB repair, progression through
meiosis, and synaptonemal complex formation
(19,
22–24).
Finally, the three proteins have been shown to physically interact; Mei5 and
Sae3 have been co-purified and co-immunoprecipitated, and an N-terminal
portion of Mei5 has been shown to interact with Dmc1 in a two-hybrid assay
(22).The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe encodes two proteins,
Swi5 and Sfr1, which share sequence homology with Sae3 and Mei5, respectively
(22). Swi5 and Sfr1 have been
shown to stimulate the strand exchange activity of Rhp51 (the S.
pombe Rad51 homologue) and Dmc1
(25). Although some results
indicate functional similarity of Swi5-Sfr1 and Mei5-Sae3, there are also
clear differences. The Mei5-Sae3 complex of budding yeast is expressed solely
during meiosis, and no mitotic phenotypes have been reported for mei5
or sae3 mutants (22,
24,
26). In contrast, the
Swi5-Sfr1 complex of fission yeast is expressed in mitotic and meiotic cells,
and mutations in SWI5 have been shown to cause defects in mitotic
recombination (27).
Furthermore, although mei5 and sae3 mutants are
phenotypically similar to dmc1 mutants, swi5 and
sfr1 mutants display more severe meiotic defects during fission yeast
meiosis than do dmc1 mutants
(27–29).
These data suggest that although Swi5-Sfr1 clearly contributes to Rad51
activity in fission yeast, it is possible that the activity of Mei5-Sae3 is
restricted to stimulating Dmc1 in budding yeast.In this study, a biochemical approach is used to test the budding yeast
Mei5-Sae3 complex for properties expected of a recombinase assembly mediator.
We show that Mei5-Sae3 binds both ssDNA and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) but
binds ssDNA preferentially. We also show that Mei5-Sae3 can overcome the
inhibitory effects of RPA on the ssDNA binding and strand assimilation
activities of Dmc1. Finally, we show that Mei5-Sae3 and RPA bind one another
directly. These results indicate that Mei5-Sae3 acts directly as a mediator
protein for assembly of Dmc1. 相似文献
6.
Ruben K. Dagda Salvatore J. Cherra III Scott M. Kulich Anurag Tandon David Park Charleen T. Chu 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(20):13843-13855
Mitochondrial dysregulation is strongly implicated in Parkinson disease.
Mutations in PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) are associated with familial
parkinsonism and neuropsychiatric disorders. Although overexpressed PINK1 is
neuroprotective, less is known about neuronal responses to loss of PINK1
function. We found that stable knockdown of PINK1 induced mitochondrial
fragmentation and autophagy in SH-SY5Y cells, which was reversed by the
reintroduction of an RNA interference (RNAi)-resistant plasmid for PINK1.
Moreover, stable or transient overexpression of wild-type PINK1 increased
mitochondrial interconnectivity and suppressed toxin-induced
autophagy/mitophagy. Mitochondrial oxidant production played an essential role
in triggering mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in PINK1 shRNA lines.
Autophagy/mitophagy served a protective role in limiting cell death, and
overexpressing Parkin further enhanced this protective mitophagic response.
The dominant negative Drp1 mutant inhibited both fission and mitophagy in
PINK1-deficient cells. Interestingly, RNAi knockdown of autophagy proteins
Atg7 and LC3/Atg8 also decreased mitochondrial fragmentation without affecting
oxidative stress, suggesting active involvement of autophagy in morphologic
remodeling of mitochondria for clearance. To summarize, loss of PINK1 function
elicits oxidative stress and mitochondrial turnover coordinated by the
autophagic and fission/fusion machineries. Furthermore, PINK1 and Parkin may
cooperate through different mechanisms to maintain mitochondrial
homeostasis.Parkinson disease is an age-related neurodegenerative disease that affects
∼1% of the population worldwide. The causes of sporadic cases are unknown,
although mitochondrial or oxidative toxins such as
1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium, 6-hydroxydopamine
(6-OHDA),3 and
rotenone reproduce features of the disease in animal and cell culture models
(1). Abnormalities in
mitochondrial respiration and increased oxidative stress are observed in cells
and tissues from parkinsonian patients
(2,
3), which also exhibit
increased mitochondrial autophagy
(4). Furthermore, mutations in
parkinsonian genes affect oxidative stress response pathways and mitochondrial
homeostasis (5). Thus,
disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis represents a major factor implicated
in the pathogenesis of sporadic and inherited parkinsonian disorders (PD).The PARK6 locus involved in autosomal recessive and early-onset PD
encodes for PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1)
(6,
7). PINK1 is a cytosolic and
mitochondrially localized 581-amino acid serine/threonine kinase that
possesses an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence
(6,
8). The primary sequence also
includes a putative transmembrane domain important for orientation of the
PINK1 domain (8), a conserved
kinase domain homologous to calcium calmodulin kinases, and a C-terminal
domain that regulates autophosphorylation activity
(9,
10). Overexpression of
wild-type PINK1, but not its PD-associated mutants, protects against several
toxic insults in neuronal cells
(6,
11,
12). Mitochondrial targeting
is necessary for some (13) but
not all of the neuroprotective effects of PINK1
(14), implicating involvement
of cytoplasmic targets that modulate mitochondrial pathobiology
(8). PINK1 catalytic activity
is necessary for its neuroprotective role, because a kinase-deficient K219M
substitution in the ATP binding pocket of PINK1 abrogates its ability to
protect neurons (14). Although
PINK1 mutations do not seem to impair mitochondrial targeting, PD-associated
mutations differentially destabilize the protein, resulting in loss of
neuroprotective activities
(13,
15).Recent studies indicate that PINK1 and Parkin interact genetically
(3,
16-18)
to prevent oxidative stress
(19,
20) and regulate mitochondrial
morphology (21). Primary cells
derived from PINK1 mutant patients exhibit mitochondrial fragmentation with
disorganized cristae, recapitulated by RNA interference studies in HeLa cells
(3).Mitochondria are degraded by macroautophagy, a process involving
sequestration of cytoplasmic cargo into membranous autophagic vacuoles (AVs)
for delivery to lysosomes (22,
23). Interestingly,
mitochondrial fission accompanies autophagic neurodegeneration elicited by the
PD neurotoxin 6-OHDA (24,
25). Moreover, mitochondrial
fragmentation and increased autophagy are observed in neurodegenerative
diseases including Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases
(4,
26-28).
Although inclusion of mitochondria in autophagosomes was once believed to be a
random process, as observed during starvation, studies involving hypoxia,
mitochondrial damage, apoptotic stimuli, or limiting amounts of aerobic
substrates in facultative anaerobes support the concept of selective
mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy)
(29,
30). In particular,
mitochondrially localized kinases may play an important role in models
involving oxidative mitochondrial injury
(25,
31,
32).Autophagy is involved in the clearance of protein aggregates
(33-35)
and normal regulation of axonal-synaptic morphology
(36). Chronic disruption of
lysosomal function results in accumulation of subtly impaired mitochondria
with decreased calcium buffering capacity
(37), implicating an important
role for autophagy in mitochondrial homeostasis
(37,
38). Recently, Parkin, which
complements the effects of PINK1 deficiency on mitochondrial morphology
(3), was found to promote
autophagy of depolarized mitochondria
(39). Conversely, Beclin
1-independent autophagy/mitophagy contributes to cell death elicited by the PD
toxins 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium and 6-OHDA
(25,
28,
31,
32), causing neurite
retraction in cells expressing a PD-linked mutation in leucine-rich repeat
kinase 2 (40). Whereas
properly regulated autophagy plays a homeostatic and neuroprotective role,
excessive or incomplete autophagy creates a condition of “autophagic
stress” that can contribute to neurodegeneration
(28).As mitochondrial fragmentation
(3) and increased mitochondrial
autophagy (4) have been
described in human cells or tissues of PD patients, we investigated whether or
not the engineered loss of PINK1 function could recapitulate these
observations in human neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y). Stable knockdown of endogenous
PINK1 gave rise to mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy and
mitophagy, whereas stable or transient overexpression of PINK1 had the
opposite effect. Autophagy/mitophagy was dependent upon increased
mitochondrial oxidant production and activation of fission. The data indicate
that PINK1 is important for the maintenance of mitochondrial networks,
suggesting that coordinated regulation of mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy
limits cell death associated with loss of PINK1 function. 相似文献
7.
Jenny Erales Sabrina Lignon Brigitte Gontero 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(19):12735-12744
A new role is reported for CP12, a highly unfolded and flexible protein,
mainly known for its redox function with A4
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Both reduced and oxidized
CP12 can prevent the in vitro thermal inactivation and aggregation of
GAPDH from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. This mechanism is thus not
redox-dependent. The protection is specific to CP12, because other proteins,
such as bovine serum albumin, thioredoxin, and a general chaperone, Hsp33, do
not fully prevent denaturation of GAPDH. Furthermore, CP12 acts as a specific
chaperone, since it does not protect other proteins, such as catalase, alcohol
dehydrogenase, or lysozyme. The interaction between CP12 and GAPDH is
necessary to prevent the aggregation and inactivation, since the mutant C66S
that does not form any complex with GAPDH cannot accomplish this protection.
Unlike the C66S mutant, the C23S mutant that lacks the N-terminal bridge is
partially able to protect and to slow down the inactivation and aggregation.
Tryptic digestion coupled to mass spectrometry confirmed that the S-loop of
GAPDH is the interaction site with CP12. Thus, CP12 not only has a redox
function but also behaves as a specific “chaperone-like protein”
for GAPDH, although a stable and not transitory interaction is observed. This
new function of CP12 may explain why it is also present in complexes involving
A2B2 GAPDHs that possess a regulatory C-terminal
extension (GapB subunit) and therefore do not require CP12 to be
redox-regulated.CP12 is a small 8.2-kDa protein present in the chloroplasts of most
photosynthetic organisms, including cyanobacteria
(1,
2), higher plants
(3), the diatom
Asterionella formosa
(4,
5), and green
(1) and red algae
(6). It allows the formation of
a supramolecular complex between phosphoribulokinase (EC 2.7.1.19) and
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
(GAPDH),3 two key
enzymes of the Calvin cycle pathway, and was recently shown to interact with
fructose bisphosphate aldolase, another enzyme of the Calvin cycle pathway
(7). The
phosphoribulokinase·GAPDH·CP12 complex has been extensively
studied in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
(8,
9) and in Arabidopsis
thaliana (10,
11). In the green alga C.
reinhardtii, the interaction between CP12 and GAPDH is strong
(8). GAPDH may exist as a
homotetramer composed of four GapA subunits (A4) in higher plants,
cyanobacteria, and green and red algae
(6,
12), but in higher plants, it
can also exist as a heterotetramer (A2B2), composed of
two subunits, GapA and GapB
(13,
14). GapB, up to now, has
exclusively been found in Streptophyta, but recently two
prasinophycean green algae, Ostreococcus tauri and Ostreococcus
lucimarinus, were also shown to possess a GapB gene, whereas
CP12 is missing (15).
The GapB subunit is similar to the GapA subunit but has a C-terminal extension
containing two redox-regulated cysteine residues
(16). Thus, although the
A4 GAPDHs lack these regulatory cysteine residues
(13,
14,
17–20),
they are also redox-regulated through its interaction with CP12, since the C
terminus of this small protein resembles the C-terminal extension of the GapB
subunit. The regulatory cysteine residues for GapA are thus supplied by CP12,
as is well documented in the literature
(1,
8,
11,
16).CP12 belongs to the family of intrinsically unstructured proteins (IUPs)
(21–26).
The amino acid composition of these proteins causes them to have no or few
secondary structures. Their total or partial lack of structure and their high
flexibility allow them to be molecular adaptors
(27,
28). They are often able to
bind to several partners and are involved in most cellular functions
(29,
30). Recently, some IUPs have
been described in photosynthetic organisms
(31,
32).There are many functional categories of IUPs
(22,
33). They can be, for
instance, involved in permanent binding and have (i) a scavenger role,
neutralizing or storing small ligands; (ii) an assembler role by forming
complexes; and (iii) an effector role by modulating the activity of a partner
molecule (33). These functions
are not exclusive; thus, CP12 can form a stable complex with GAPDH, regulating
its redox properties (8,
34,
35), and can also bind a metal
ion (36,
37). IUPs can also bind
transiently to partners, and some of them have been found to possess a
chaperone activity (31,
38). This chaperone function
was first shown for α-synuclein
(39) and for α-casein
(40), which are fully
disordered. The amino acid composition of IUPs is less hydrophobic than those
of soluble proteins; hence, they lack hydrophobic cores and do not become
insoluble when heated. Since CP12 belongs to this family, we tested if it was
resistant to heat treatment and finally, since it is tightly bound to GAPDH,
if it could prevent aggregation of its partner, GAPDH, an enzyme well known
for its tendency to aggregate
(41–44)
and consequently a substrate commonly used in chaperone studies
(45,
46).Unlike chaperones, which form transient, dynamic complexes with their
protein substrates through hydrophobic interactions
(47,
48), CP12 forms a stable
complex with GAPDH. The interaction involves the C-terminal part of the
protein and the presence of negatively charged residues on CP12
(35). However, only a
site-directed mutagenesis has been performed to characterize the interaction
site on GAPDH. Although the mutation could have an indirect effect, the
residue Arg-197 was shown to be a good candidate for the interaction site
(49).In this report, we accordingly used proteolysis experiments coupled with
mass spectrometry to detect which regions of GAPDH are protected by its
association with CP12. To conclude, the aim of this report was to characterize
a chaperone function of CP12 that had never been described before and to map
the interaction site on GAPDH using an approach that does not involve
site-directed mutagenesis. 相似文献
8.
Kuen-Feng Chen Pei-Yen Yeh Chiun Hsu Chih-Hung Hsu Yen-Shen Lu Hsing-Pang Hsieh Pei-Jer Chen Ann-Lii Cheng 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(17):11121-11133
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and aggressive
human malignancies. Recombinant tumor necrosis factor-related
apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a promising anti-tumor agent. However,
many HCC cells show resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In this study, we
showed that bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, overcame TRAIL resistance in
HCC cells, including Huh-7, Hep3B, and Sk-Hep1. The combination of bortezomib
and TRAIL restored the sensitivity of HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis.
Comparing the molecular change in HCC cells treated with these agents, we
found that down-regulation of phospho-Akt (P-Akt) played a key role in
mediating TRAIL sensitization of bortezomib. The first evidence was that
bortezomib down-regulated P-Akt in a dose- and time-dependent manner in
TRAIL-treated HCC cells. Second, , a PI3K inhibitor, also sensitized
resistant HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Third, knocking down Akt1 by
small interference RNA also enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Huh-7 cells.
Finally, ectopic expression of mutant Akt (constitutive active) in HCC cells
abolished TRAIL sensitization effect of bortezomib. Moreover, okadaic acid, a
protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibitor, reversed down-regulation of P-Akt in
bortezomib-treated cells, and PP2A knockdown by small interference RNA also
reduced apoptosis induced by the combination of TRAIL and bortezomib,
indicating that PP2A may be important in mediating the effect of bortezomib on
TRAIL sensitization. Together, bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance at
clinically achievable concentrations in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and
this effect is mediated at least partly via inhibition of the PI3K/Akt
pathway.Hepatocellular carcinoma
(HCC) LY2940022 is currently
the fifth most common solid tumor worldwide and the fourth leading cause of
cancer-related death. To date, surgery is still the only curative treatment
but is only feasible in a small portion of patients
(1). Drug treatment is the
major therapy for patients with advanced stage disease. Unfortunately, the
response rate to traditional chemotherapy for HCC patients is unsatisfactory
(1). Novel pharmacological
therapy is urgently needed for patients with advanced HCC. In this regard, the
approval of sorafenib might open a new era of molecularly targeted therapy in
the treatment of HCC patients.Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a
type II transmembrane protein and a member of the TNF family, is a promising
anti-tumor agent under clinical investigation
(2). TRAIL functions by
engaging its receptors expressed on the surface of target cells. Five
receptors specific for TRAIL have been identified, including DR4/TRAIL-R1,
DR5/TRAIL-R2, DcR1, DcR2, and osteoprotegerin. Among TRAIL receptors, only DR4
and DR5 contain an effective death domain that is essential to formation of
death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), a critical step for TRAIL-induced
apoptosis. Notably, the trimerization of the death domains recruits an adaptor
molecule, Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD), which subsequently
recruits and activates caspase-8. In type I cells, activation of caspase-8 is
sufficient to activate caspase-3 to induce apoptosis; however, in another type
of cells (type II), the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway is essential for
apoptosis characterized by cleavage of Bid and release of cytochrome
c from mitochondria, which subsequently activates caspase-9 and
caspase-3 (3).Although TRAIL induces apoptosis in malignant cells but sparing normal
cells, some tumor cells are resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Mechanisms
responsible for the resistance include receptors and intracellular resistance.
Although the cell surface expression of DR4 or DR5 is absolutely required for
TRAIL-induced apoptosis, tumor cells expressing these death receptors are not
always sensitive to TRAIL due to intracellular mechanisms. For example, the
cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), a homologue to caspase-8 but
without protease activity, has been linked to TRAIL resistance in several
studies (4,
5). In addition, inactivation
of Bax, a proapoptotic Bcl-2 family protein, resulted in resistance to TRAIL
in MMR-deficient tumors (6,
7), and reintroduction of Bax
into Bax-deficient cells restored TRAIL sensitivity
(8), indicating that the Bcl-2
family plays a critical role in intracellular mechanisms for resistance of
TRAIL.Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor approved clinically for multiple myeloma
and mantle cell lymphoma, has been investigated intensively for many types of
cancer (9). Accumulating
studies indicate that the combination of bortezomib and TRAIL overcomes the
resistance to TRAIL in various types of cancer, including acute myeloid
leukemia (4), lymphoma
(10–13),
prostate
(14–17),
colon (15,
18,
19), bladder
(14,
16), renal cell carcinoma
(20), thyroid
(21), ovary
(22), non-small cell lung
(23,
24), sarcoma
(25), and HCC
(26,
27). Molecular targets
responsible for the sensitizing effect of bortezomib on TRAIL-induced cell
death include DR4 (14,
27), DR5
(14,
20,
22–23,
28), c-FLIP
(4,
11,
21–23,
29), NF-κB
(12,
24,
30), p21
(16,
21,
25), and p27
(25). In addition, Bcl-2
family also plays a role in the combinational effect of bortezomib and TRAIL,
including Bcl-2 (10,
21), Bax
(13,
22), Bak
(27), Bcl-xL
(21), Bik
(18), and Bim
(15).Recently, we have reported that Akt signaling is a major molecular
determinant in bortezomib-induced apoptosis in HCC cells
(31). In this study, we
demonstrated that bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells through
inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway. 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Denise A. Berti Cain Morano Lilian C. Russo Leandro M. Castro Fernanda M. Cunha Xin Zhang Juan Sironi Cl��cio F. Klitzke Emer S. Ferro Lloyd D. Fricker 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(21):14105-14116
Thimet oligopeptidase (EC 3.4.24.15; EP24.15) is an intracellular enzyme
that has been proposed to metabolize peptides within cells, thereby affecting
antigen presentation and G protein-coupled receptor signal transduction.
However, only a small number of intracellular substrates of EP24.15 have been
reported previously. Here we have identified over 100 peptides in human
embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells that are derived from intracellular
proteins; many but not all of these peptides are substrates or products of
EP24.15. First, cellular peptides were extracted from HEK293 cells and
incubated in vitro with purified EP24.15. Then the peptides were
labeled with isotopic tags and analyzed by mass spectrometry to obtain
quantitative data on the extent of cleavage. A related series of experiments
tested the effect of overexpression of EP24.15 on the cellular levels of
peptides in HEK293 cells. Finally, synthetic peptides that corresponded to 10
of the cellular peptides were incubated with purified EP24.15 in
vitro, and the cleavage was monitored by high pressure liquid
chromatography and mass spectrometry. Many of the EP24.15 substrates
identified by these approaches are 9–11 amino acids in length,
supporting the proposal that EP24.15 can function in the degradation of
peptides that could be used for antigen presentation. However, EP24.15 also
converts some peptides into products that are 8–10 amino acids, thus
contributing to the formation of peptides for antigen presentation. In
addition, the intracellular peptides described here are potential candidates
to regulate protein interactions within cells.Intracellular protein turnover is a crucial step for cell functioning, and
if this process is impaired, the elevated levels of aged proteins usually lead
to the formation of intracellular insoluble aggregates that can cause severe
pathologies (1). In mammalian
cells, most proteins destined for degradation are initially tagged with a
polyubiquitin chain in an energy-dependent process and then digested to small
peptides by the 26 S proteasome, a large proteolytic complex involved in the
regulation of cell division, gene expression, and other key processes
(2,
3). In eukaryotes, 30–90%
of newly synthesized proteins may be degraded by proteasomes within minutes of
synthesis (3,
4). In addition to proteasomes,
other extralysosomal proteolytic systems have been reported
(5,
6). The proteasome cleaves
proteins into peptides that are typically 2–20 amino acids in length
(7). In most cases, these
peptides are thought to be rapidly hydrolyzed into amino acids by
aminopeptidases
(8–10).
However, some intracellular peptides escape complete degradation and are
imported into the endoplasmic reticulum where they associate with major
histocompatibility complex class I
(MHC-I)3 molecules and
traffic to the cell surface for presentation to the immune system
(10–12).
Additionally, based on the fact that free peptides added to the intracellular
milieu can regulate cellular functions mediated by protein interactions such
as gene regulation, metabolism, cell signaling, and protein targeting
(13,
14), intracellular peptides
generated by proteasomes that escape degradation have been suggested to play a
role in regulating protein interactions
(15). Indeed, oligopeptides
isolated from rat brain tissue using the catalytically inactive EP24.15 (EC
3.4.24.15) were introduced into Chinese hamster ovarian-S and HEK293 cells and
were found capable of altering G protein-coupled receptor signal transduction
(16). Moreover, EP24.15
overexpression itself changed both angiotensin II and isoproterenol signal
transduction, suggesting a physiological function for its intracellular
substrates/products (16).EP24.15 is a zinc-dependent peptidase of the metallopeptidase M3 family
that contains the HEXXH motif
(17). This enzyme was first
described as a neuropeptide-degrading enzyme present in the soluble fraction
of brain homogenates (18).
Whereas EP24.15 can be secreted
(19,
20), its predominant location
in the cytosol and nucleus suggests that the primary function of this enzyme
is not the extracellular degradation of neuropeptides and hormones
(21,
22). EP24.15 was shown in
vivo to participate in antigen presentation through MHC-I
(23–25)
and in vitro to bind
(26) or degrade
(27) some MHC-I associated
peptides. EP24.15 has also been shown in vitro to degrade peptides
containing 5–17 amino acids produced after proteasome digestion of
β-casein (28). EP24.15
shows substrate size restriction to peptides containing from 5 to 17 amino
acids because of its catalytic center that is located in a deep channel
(29). Despite the size
restriction, EP24.15 has a broad substrate specificity
(30), probably because a
significant portion of the enzyme-binding site is lined with potentially
flexible loops that allow reorganization of the active site following
substrate binding (29).
Recently, it has also been suggested that certain substrates may be cleaved by
an open form of EP24.15 (31).
This characteristic is supported by the ability of EP24.15 to accommodate
different amino acid residues at subsites S4 to S3′, which even includes
the uncommon post-proline cleavage
(30). Such biochemical and
structural features make EP24.15 a versatile enzyme to degrade structurally
unrelated oligopeptides.Previously, brain peptides that bound to catalytically inactive EP24.15
were isolated and identified using mass spectrometry
(22). The majority of peptides
captured by the inactive enzyme were intracellular protein fragments that
efficiently interacted with EP24.15; the smallest peptide isolated in these
assays contained 5 and the largest 17 amino acids
(15,
16,
22,
32), which is within the size
range previously reported for natural and synthetic substrates of EP24.15
(18,
30,
33,
34). Interestingly, the
peptides released by the proteasome are in the same size range of EP24.15
competitive inhibitors/substrates
(7,
35,
36). Taken altogether, these
data suggest that in the intracellular environment EP24.15 could further
cleave proteasome-generated peptides unrelated to MHC-I antigen presentation
(15).Although the mutated inactive enzyme “capture” assay was
successful in identifying several cellular protein fragments that were
substrates for EP24.15, it also found some interacting peptides that were not
substrates. In this study, we used several approaches to directly screen for
cellular peptides that were cleaved by EP24.15. The first approach involved
the extraction of cellular peptides from the HEK293 cell line, incubation
in vitro with purified EP24.15, labeling with isotopic tags, and
analysis by mass spectrometry to obtain quantitative data on the extent of
cleavage. The second approach examined the effect of EP24.15 overexpression on
the cellular levels of peptides in the HEK293 cell line. The third set of
experiments tested synthetic peptides with purified EP24.15 in vitro,
and examined cleavage by high pressure liquid chromatography and mass
spectrometry. Collectively, these studies have identified a large number of
intracellular peptides, including those that likely represent the endogenous
substrates and products of EP24.15, and this original information contributes
to a better understanding of the function of this enzyme in vivo. 相似文献
15.
16.
Jonathan M. Budzik So-Young Oh Olaf Schneewind 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(19):12989-12997
Bacillus cereus and other Gram-positive bacteria elaborate pili
via a sortase D-catalyzed transpeptidation mechanism from major and minor
pilin precursor substrates. After cleavage of the LPXTG sorting
signal of the major pilin, BcpA, sortase D forms an amide bond between the
C-terminal threonine and the amino group of lysine within the YPKN motif of
another BcpA subunit. Pilus assembly terminates upon sortase A cleavage of the
BcpA sorting signal, resulting in a covalent bond between BcpA and the cell
wall cross-bridge. Here, we show that the IPNTG sorting signal of BcpB, the
minor pilin, is cleaved by sortase D but not by sortase A. The C-terminal
threonine of BcpB is amide-linked to the YPKN motif of BcpA, thereby
positioning BcpB at the tip of pili. Thus, unique attributes of the sorting
signals of minor pilins provide Gram-positive bacteria with a universal
mechanism ordering assembly of pili.Sortases catalyze transpeptidation reactions to assemble proteins in the
envelope of Gram-positive bacteria
(1). Secreted proteins require
a C-terminal sorting signal for sortase recognition such that sortase cleaves
the substrate at a short peptide motif and forms a thioester-linked
intermediate to its active site cysteine
(2–4).
Nucleophilic attack by an amino group within the bacterial envelope resolves
the thioester intermediate, generating an amide bond tethering surface
proteins at their C terminus onto Gram-positive bacteria
(5). Four classes of sortases
can be distinguished on the basis of sequence homology and substrate
recognition (6,
7). Sortase A cleaves secreted
protein at LPXTG sorting signals and recognizes the amino group of
lipid II peptidoglycan precursors as a nucleophile
(8,
9). Sortase B cleaves protein
substrates at NPQTN sorting signals
(10). This enzyme immobilizes
proteins within fully assembled cell walls, utilizing the cell wall
cross-bridge as a nucleophile
(11). Sortase C cuts LPNTA
sorting signals and anchors proteins to the peptidoglycan cross-bridges in
sporulating bacteria (12,
13). Finally, sortase D
catalyzes transpeptidation reactions in the assembly of pili
(14,
15). Sortase D recognizes the
amino group of lysine residues within the YPKN motif of pilin subunits as
nucleophiles (16). The
resultant sortase D-catalyzed amide bond links adjacent pilin subunits to grow
the pilus fiber (16,
17).Pili of Gram-positive bacteria comprised either two or three different
pilin subunits synthesized as cytoplasmic precursors with N-terminal signal
peptides and C-terminal sorting signals (P1 precursors)
(14,
18). After translocation
across the plasma membrane, P2 precursor species arise from removal of the
signal peptide from P1 precursors by a signal peptidase
(16). Bacillus cereus
pili are composed of two subunits; that is, the major pilin, BcpA, and the
minor pilin, BcpB (15). In
contrast to BcpA, which is deposited throughout the pilus, BcpB is found at
fiber tip (15). Sortase D
cleaves the BcpA LPXTG motif sorting signal between the threonine and
glycine residues to form an amide bond to the ε-amino group of the lysine
within the YPKN motif of adjacent BcpA subunits
(16). However, sortase A also
cleaves BcpA precursors, which are subsequently linked to the side chain amino
group of meso-diaminopimelic acid within lipid II
(19). The latter reaction
serves to terminate fiber elongation, immobilizing BcpA pili in the cell wall
envelope (19).The conservation of sortase D, the YPKN motif, and C-terminal sorting
signal in major pilin subunits suggest a universal pilus assembly mechanism
among Gram-positive bacteria
(14,
20). However, the molecular
mechanism whereby bacilli deposit BcpB, the minor pilin, at the tip of BcpA
pili is not known. Although the BcpB precursor harbors an N-terminal signal
peptide and a C-terminal IPNTG sorting signal, it lacks the YPKN pilin motif
of the major subunit (15).
Furthermore, the substrate properties of the BcpB IPNTG sorting signal for the
four classes of sortases expressed by bacilli has yet to be established. 相似文献
17.
S��bastien Thomas Brigitte Ritter David Verbich Claire Sanson Lyne Bourbonni��re R. Anne McKinney Peter S. McPherson 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(18):12410-12419
Intersectin-short (intersectin-s) is a multimodule scaffolding protein
functioning in constitutive and regulated forms of endocytosis in non-neuronal
cells and in synaptic vesicle (SV) recycling at the neuromuscular junction of
Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans. In vertebrates,
alternative splicing generates a second isoform, intersectin-long
(intersectin-l), that contains additional modular domains providing a guanine
nucleotide exchange factor activity for Cdc42. In mammals, intersectin-s is
expressed in multiple tissues and cells, including glia, but excluded from
neurons, whereas intersectin-l is a neuron-specific isoform. Thus,
intersectin-I may regulate multiple forms of endocytosis in mammalian neurons,
including SV endocytosis. We now report, however, that intersectin-l is
localized to somatodendritic regions of cultured hippocampal neurons, with
some juxtanuclear accumulation, but is excluded from synaptophysin-labeled
axon terminals. Consistently, intersectin-l knockdown (KD) does not affect SV
recycling. Instead intersectin-l co-localizes with clathrin heavy chain and
adaptor protein 2 in the somatodendritic region of neurons, and its KD reduces
the rate of transferrin endocytosis. The protein also co-localizes with
F-actin at dendritic spines, and intersectin-l KD disrupts spine maturation
during development. Our data indicate that intersectin-l is indeed an
important regulator of constitutive endocytosis and neuronal development but
that it is not a prominent player in the regulated endocytosis of SVs.Clathrin-mediated endocytosis
(CME)4 is a
major mechanism by which cells take up nutrients, control the surface levels
of multiple proteins, including ion channels and transporters, and regulate
the coupling of signaling receptors to downstream signaling cascades
(1-5).
In neurons, CME takes on additional specialized roles; it is an important
process regulating synaptic vesicle (SV) availability through endocytosis and
recycling of SV membranes (6,
7), it shapes synaptic
plasticity
(8-10),
and it is crucial in maintaining synaptic membranes and membrane structure
(11).Numerous endocytic accessory proteins participate in CME, interacting with
each other and with core components of the endocytic machinery such as
clathrin heavy chain (CHC) and adaptor protein-2 (AP-2) through specific
modules and peptide motifs
(12). One such module is the
Eps15 homology domain that binds to proteins bearing NPF motifs
(13,
14). Another is the Src
homology 3 (SH3) domain, which binds to proline-rich domains in protein
partners (15). Intersectin is
a multimodule scaffolding protein that interacts with a wide range of
proteins, including several involved in CME
(16). Intersectin has two
N-terminal Eps15 homology domains that are responsible for binding to epsin,
SCAMP1, and numb
(17-19),
a central coil-coiled domain that interacts with Eps15 and SNAP-23 and -25
(17,
20,
21), and five SH3 domains in
its C-terminal region that interact with multiple proline-rich domain
proteins, including synaptojanin, dynamin, N-WASP, CdGAP, and mSOS
(16,
22-25).
The rich binding capability of intersectin has linked it to various functions
from CME (17,
26,
27) and signaling
(22,
28,
29) to mitogenesis
(30,
31) and regulation of the
actin cytoskeleton (23).Intersectin functions in SV recycling at the neuromuscular junction of
Drosophila and C. elegans where it acts as a scaffold,
regulating the synaptic levels of endocytic accessory proteins
(21,
32-34).
In vertebrates, the intersectin gene is subject to alternative splicing, and a
longer isoform (intersectin-l) is generated that is expressed exclusively in
neurons (26,
28,
35,
36). This isoform has all the
binding modules of its short (intersectin-s) counterpart but also has
additional domains: a DH and a PH domain that provide guanine nucleotide
exchange factor (GEF) activity specific for Cdc42
(23,
37) and a C2 domain at the C
terminus. Through its GEF activity and binding to actin regulatory proteins,
including N-WASP, intersectin-l has been implicated in actin regulation and
the development of dendritic spines
(19,
23,
24). In addition, because the
rest of the binding modules are shared between intersectin-s and -l, it is
generally thought that the two intersectin isoforms have the same endocytic
functions. In particular, given the well defined role for the invertebrate
orthologs of intersectin-s in SV endocytosis, it is thought that intersectin-l
performs this role in mammalian neurons, which lack intersectin-s. Defining
the complement of intersectin functional activities in mammalian neurons is
particularly relevant given that the protein is involved in the
pathophysiology of Down syndrome (DS). Specifically, the intersectin gene is
localized on chromosome 21q22.2 and is overexpressed in DS brains
(38). Interestingly,
alterations in endosomal pathways are a hallmark of DS neurons and neurons
from the partial trisomy 16 mouse, Ts65Dn, a model for DS
(39,
40). Thus, an endocytic
trafficking defect may contribute to the DS disease process.Here, the functional roles of intersectin-l were studied in cultured
hippocampal neurons. We find that intersectin-l is localized to the
somatodendritic regions of neurons, where it co-localizes with CHC and AP-2
and regulates the uptake of transferrin. Intersectin-l also co-localizes with
actin at dendritic spines and disrupting intersectin-l function alters
dendritic spine development. In contrast, intersectin-l is absent from
presynaptic terminals and has little or no role in SV recycling. 相似文献
18.
Mikael K. Schnizler Katrin Schnizler Xiang-ming Zha Duane D. Hall John A. Wemmie Johannes W. Hell Michael J. Welsh 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(5):2697-2705
The acid-sensing ion channel 1a (ASIC1a) is widely expressed in central and
peripheral neurons where it generates transient cation currents when
extracellular pH falls. ASIC1a confers pH-dependent modulation on postsynaptic
dendritic spines and has critical effects in neurological diseases associated
with a reduced pH. However, knowledge of the proteins that interact with
ASIC1a and influence its function is limited. Here, we show that
α-actinin, which links membrane proteins to the actin cytoskeleton,
associates with ASIC1a in brain and in cultured cells. The interaction
depended on an α-actinin-binding site in the ASIC1a C terminus that was
specific for ASIC1a versus other ASICs and for α-actinin-1 and
-4. Co-expressing α-actinin-4 altered ASIC1a current density, pH
sensitivity, desensitization rate, and recovery from desensitization.
Moreover, reducing α-actinin expression altered acid-activated currents
in hippocampal neurons. These findings suggest that α-actinins may link
ASIC1a to a macromolecular complex in the postsynaptic membrane where it
regulates ASIC1a activity.Acid-sensing ion channels
(ASICs)2 are
H+-gated members of the DEG/ENaC family
(1–3).
Members of this family contain cytosolic N and C termini, two transmembrane
domains, and a large cysteine-rich extracellular domain. ASIC subunits combine
as homo- or heterotrimers to form cation channels that are widely expressed in
the central and peripheral nervous systems
(1–4).
In mammals, four genes encode ASICs, and two subunits, ASIC1 and ASIC2, have
two splice forms, a and b. Central nervous system neurons express ASIC1a,
ASIC2a, and ASIC2b
(5–7).
Homomeric ASIC1a channels are activated when extracellular pH drops below 7.2,
and half-maximal activation occurs at pH 6.5–6.8
(8–10).
These channels desensitize in the continued presence of a low extracellular
pH, and they can conduct Ca2+
(9,
11–13).
ASIC1a is required for acid-evoked currents in central nervous system neurons;
disrupting the gene encoding ASIC1a eliminates H+-gated currents
unless extracellular pH is reduced below pH 5.0
(5,
7).Previous studies found ASIC1a enriched in synaptosomal membrane fractions
and present in dendritic spines, the site of excitatory synapses
(5,
14,
15). Consistent with this
localization, ASIC1a null mice manifested deficits in hippocampal
long term potentiation, learning, and memory, which suggested that ASIC1a is
required for normal synaptic plasticity
(5,
16). ASICs might be activated
during neurotransmission when synaptic vesicles empty their acidic contents
into the synaptic cleft or when neuronal activity lowers extracellular pH
(17–19).
Ion channels, including those at the synapse often interact with multiple
proteins in a macromolecular complex that incorporates regulators of their
function (20,
21). For ASIC1a, only a few
interacting proteins have been identified. Earlier work indicated that ASIC1a
interacts with another postsynaptic scaffolding protein, PICK1
(15,
22,
23). ASIC1a also has been
reported to interact with annexin II light chain p11 through its cytosolic N
terminus to increase cell surface expression
(24) and with
Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II to phosphorylate the
channel (25). However, whether
ASIC1a interacts with additional proteins and with the cytoskeleton remain
unknown. Moreover, it is not known whether such interactions alter ASIC1a
function.In analyzing the ASIC1a amino acid sequence, we identified cytosolic
residues that might bind α-actinins. α-Actinins cluster membrane
proteins and signaling molecules into macromolecular complexes and link
membrane proteins to the actincytoskeleton (for review, Ref.
26). Four genes encode
α-actinin-1, -2, -3, and -4 isoforms. α-Actinins contain an
N-terminal head domain that binds F-actin, a C-terminal region containing two
EF-hand motifs, and a central rod domain containing four spectrin-like motifs
(26–28).
The C-terminal portion of the rod segment appears to be crucial for binding to
membrane proteins. The α-actinins assemble into antiparallel homodimers
through interactions in their rod domain. α-Actinins-1, -2, and -4 are
enriched in dendritic spines, concentrating at the postsynaptic membrane
(29–35).
In the postsynaptic membrane of excitatory synapses, α-actinin connects
the NMDA receptor to the actin cytoskeleton, and this interaction is key for
Ca2+-dependent inhibition of NMDA receptors
(36–38).
α-Actinins can also regulate the membrane trafficking and function of
several cation channels, including L-type Ca2+ channels,
K+ channels, and TRP channels
(39–41).To better understand the function of ASIC1a channels in macromolecular
complexes, we asked if ASIC1a associates with α-actinins. We were
interested in the α-actinins because they and ASIC1a, both, are present
in dendritic spines, ASIC1a contains a potential α-actinin binding
sequence, and the related epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC) interacts
with the cytoskeleton (42,
43). Therefore, we
hypothesized that α-actinin interacts structurally and functionally with
ASIC1a. 相似文献
19.
20.
Tatsuhiro Sato Akio Nakashima Lea Guo Fuyuhiko Tamanoi 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(19):12783-12791
Rheb G-protein plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling pathway
by activating mTORC1. The activation of mTORC1 by Rheb can be faithfully
reproduced in vitro by using mTORC1 immunoprecipitated by the use of
anti-raptor antibody from mammalian cells starved for nutrients. The low
in vitro kinase activity against 4E-BP1 of this mTORC1 preparation is
dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb. On the other hand,
the addition of Rheb does not activate mTORC2 immunoprecipitated from
mammalian cells by the use of anti-rictor antibody. The activation of mTORC1
is specific to Rheb, because other G-proteins such as KRas, RalA/B, and Cdc42
did not activate mTORC1. Both Rheb1 and Rheb2 activate mTORC1. In addition,
the activation is dependent on the presence of bound GTP. We also find that
the effector domain of Rheb is required for the mTORC1 activation. FKBP38, a
recently proposed mediator of Rheb action, appears not to be involved in the
Rheb-dependent activation of mTORC1 in vitro, because the preparation
of mTORC1 that is devoid of FKBP38 is still activated by Rheb. The addition of
Rheb results in a significant increase of binding of the substrate protein
4E-BP1 to mTORC1. PRAS40, a TOR signaling (TOS) motif-containing protein that
competes with the binding of 4EBP1 to mTORC1, inhibits Rheb-induced activation
of mTORC1. A preparation of mTORC1 that is devoid of raptor is not activated
by Rheb. Rheb does not induce autophosphorylation of mTOR. These results
suggest that Rheb induces alteration in the binding of 4E-BP1 with mTORC1 to
regulate mTORC1 activation.Rheb defines a unique member of the Ras superfamily G-proteins
(1). We have shown that Rheb
proteins are conserved and are found from yeast to human
(2). Although yeast and fruit
fly have one Rheb, mouse and human have two Rheb proteins termed Rheb1 (or
simply Rheb) and Rheb2 (RhebL1)
(2). Structurally, these
proteins contain G1-G5 boxes, short stretches of amino acids that define the
function of the Ras superfamily G-proteins including guanine nucleotide
binding (1,
3,
4). Rheb proteins have a
conserved arginine at residue 15 that corresponds to residue 12 of Ras
(1). The effector domain
required for the binding with downstream effectors encompasses the G2 box and
its adjacent sequences (1,
5). Structural analysis by
x-ray crystallography further shows that the effector domain is exposed to
solvent, is located close to the phosphates of GTP especially at residues
35–38, and undergoes conformational change during GTP/GDP exchange
(6). In addition, all Rheb
proteins end with the CAAX (C is cysteine, A is an aliphatic amino
acid, and X is the C-terminal amino acid) motif that signals
farnesylation. In fact, we as well as others have shown that these proteins
are farnesylated
(7–9).Rheb plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling, a signaling
pathway that plays central roles in regulating protein synthesis and growth in
response to nutrient, energy, and growth conditions
(10–14).
Rheb is down-regulated by a TSC1·TSC2 complex that acts as a
GTPase-activating protein for Rheb
(15–19).
Recent studies established that the GAP domain of TSC2 defines the functional
domain for the down-regulation of Rheb
(20). Mutations in the
Tsc1 or Tsc2 gene lead to tuberous sclerosis whose symptoms
include the appearance of benign tumors called hamartomas at different parts
of the body as well as neurological symptoms
(21,
22). Overexpression of Rheb
results in constitutive activation of mTOR even in the absence of nutrients
(15,
16). Two mTOR complexes,
mTORC1 and mTORC2, have been identified
(23,
24). Whereas mTORC1 is
involved in protein synthesis activation mediated by S6K and 4EBP1, mTORC2 is
involved in the phosphorylation of Akt in response to insulin. It has been
suggested that Rheb is involved in the activation of mTORC1 but not mTORC2
(25).Although Rheb is clearly involved in the activation of mTOR, the mechanism
of activation has not been established. We as well as others have suggested a
model that involves the interaction of Rheb with the TOR complex
(26–28).
Rheb activation of mTOR kinase activity using immunoprecipitated mTORC1 was
reported (29). Rheb has been
shown to interact with mTOR
(27,
30), and this may involve
direct interaction of Rheb with the kinase domain of mTOR
(27). However, this Rheb/mTOR
interaction is a weak interaction and is not dependent on the presence of GTP
bound to Rheb (27,
28). Recently, a different
model proposing that FKBP38 (FK506-binding protein
38) mediates the activation of
mTORC1 by Rheb was proposed
(31,
32). In this model, FKBP38
binds mTOR and negatively regulates mTOR activity, and this negative
regulation is blocked by the binding of Rheb to FKBP38. However, recent
reports dispute this idea
(33).To further characterize Rheb activation of mTOR, we have utilized an in
vitro system that reproduces activation of mTORC1 by the addition of
recombinant Rheb. We used mTORC1 immunoprecipitated from nutrient-starved
cells using anti-raptor antibody and have shown that its kinase activity
against 4E-BP1 is dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb.
Importantly, the activation of mTORC1 is specific to Rheb and is dependent on
the presence of bound GTP as well as an intact effector domain. FKBP38 is not
detected in our preparation and further investigation suggests that FKBP38 is
not an essential component for the activation of mTORC1 by Rheb. Our study
revealed that Rheb enhances the binding of a substrate 4E-BP1 with mTORC1
rather than increasing the kinase activity of mTOR. 相似文献