Mutation analysis of Lhca1 antenna complex. Low energy absorption forms originate from pigment-pigment interactions

The light harvesting complex Lhca1, one of the four gene products comprising the photosystem I antenna system, has been analyzed by site-directed mutagenesis with the aim of determining the chromophore(s) responsible for its long wavelength chlorophyll spectral form, a specific characteristic of the LHCI antenna complex. A family of mutant proteins, each carrying a mutation at a single chlorophyll-binding residue, was obtained and characterized by biochemical and spectroscopic methods. A map of the chromophores bound to each of the 10 chlorophyll-binding sites was drawn, and the energy levels of the Q(y) transition were determined in most cases. When compared with Lhcb proteins previously analyzed, Lhca1 is characterized by stronger interactions between individual chromophores as detected by both biochemical and spectroscopic methods; most mutations, although targeted to a single residue, lead to the loss of more than one chromophore and of conservative CD signals typical of chlorophyll-chlorophyll interactions. The lower energy absorption form (686 nm at 100K, 688 nm at room temperature), which is responsible for the red-shifted emission components at 690 and 701 nm, typical of Lhca1, is associated with a chlorophyll a/chlorophyll a excitonic interaction originating from a pigment cluster localized in the protein domain situated between helix C and the helix A/helix B cross. This cluster includes chlorophylls bound to sites A5-B5-B6 and a xanthophyll bound to site L2.     

Use of immobilized light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein to study the stoichiometry of its self-association.

D. J. Davis & E. L. Gross (1976) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 449, 554-564 previously observed that the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein or chlorophyll protein complex II self-associated as determined by ultracentrifugation. We have determined the stoichiometry of complex formation by immobilizing the monomer on ethylenediamine-Sepharose 4B and determing the ability of immobilized protein to bind the free protein. The amount of soluble protein bound to the immobilized protein increased as the concentration of soluble protein increased. The binding was maximal between pH 7 and 8. The maximum binding was three molecules bound per one molecule of protein immobilized. These results indicate that a tetramer is the intrinsic structural unit of the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein in the chloroplast membrane. Upon complex formation, the chlorophyll fluorescence was decreased without any spectral change. The maximum binding was approximately doubled upon addition of 0.5 mM CaCl2 whereas 5 mM NaCl had no effect. Addition of CaCl2 had no effect on the fluorescence of the monomer. The light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein can be isolated from a sodium lauryl sulfate extract of chloroplasts by affinity chromatography using the immobilized light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein.     

Carotenoid-binding sites of the major light-harvesting complex II of higher plants.

Recombinant light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) proteins with modified carotenoid composition have been obtained by in vitro reconstitution of the Lhcb1 protein overexpressed in bacteria. The monomeric protein possesses three xanthophyll-binding sites. The L1 and L2 sites, localized by electron crystallography in the helix A/helix B cross, have the highest affinity for lutein, but also bind violaxanthin and zeaxanthin with lower affinity. The latter xanthophyll causes disruption of excitation energy transfer. The occupancy of at least one of these sites, probably L1, is essential for protein folding. Neoxanthin is bound to a distinct site (N1) that is highly selective for this species and whose occupancy is not essential for protein folding. Whereas xanthophylls in the L1 and L2 sites interact mainly with chlorophyll a, neoxanthin shows strong interaction with chlorophyll b, inducing the hyperchromic effect of the 652 nm absorption band. This observation explains the recent results of energy transfer from carotenoids to chlorophyll b obtained by femtosecond absorption spectroscopy. Whereas xanthophylls in the L1 and L2 sites are active in photoprotection through chlorophyll-triplet quenching, neoxanthin seems to act mainly in (1)O(2)(*) scavenging.     

Chromophore organization in the higher-plant photosystem II antenna protein CP26

The chlorophyll a/b-xanthophyll-protein CP26 complex belongs to the Lhc protein family. It binds nine chlorophylls and two xanthophylls per 26.6 kDa polypeptide. Determination of the characteristics of each binding site is needed for the understanding of functional organization of individual proteins belonging to the photosystem II supramolecular complex. The biochemical and spectroscopic features of native CP26 are presented here together with identification of pigment binding and energy transitions in different sites. The analysis has been performed via a new approach using recombinant CP26 complexes in which the chromophore content has been experimentally modified. Data were interpreted on the basis of homology with CP29 and LHCII complexes, for which detailed knowledge is available from mutation analysis. We propose that one additional Chl b is present in CP26 as compared to CP29 and that it is located in site B2. We also found that in CP26 three chlorophyll binding sites are selective for Chl a, one of them being essential for the folding of the pigment-protein complex. Two xanthophyll binding sites were identified, one of which (L1) is essential for protein folding and specifically binds lutein. The second site (L2) has lower selectivity and can bind any of the xanthophyll species present in thylakoids.     

The effect of protein conformational flexibility on the electronic properties of a chromophore

In this paper we address the question of how a protein environment can modulate the absorption spectrum of a chromophore during a molecular dynamics simulation. The effect of the protein is modeled as an external field acting on the unperturbed eigenstates of the chromophore. Using a first-principles method recently developed in our group, we calculated the perturbed electronic energies for each frame and the corresponding wavelength absorption during the simulation. We apply this method to a nanosencond timescale molecular dynamics simulation of the light-harvesting peridinin-chlorophyll-protein complex from Amphidinium carterae, where chlorophyll was selected among the chromophores of the complex for the calculation. The combination of this quantum-classical calculation with the analysis of the large amplitude motions of the protein makes it possible to point out the relationship between the conformational flexibility of the environment and the excitation wavelength of the chromophore. Results support the idea of the existence of a correlation between protein conformational flexibility and chlorophyll electronic transitions induced by light.     

Consecutive binding of chlorophylls a and b during the assembly in vitro of light-harvesting chlorophyll-a/b protein (LHCIIb)

The apoprotein of the major light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b complex (LHCIIb) is post-translationally imported into the chloroplast, where membrane insertion, protein folding, and pigment binding take place. The sequence and molecular mechanism of the latter steps is largely unknown. The complex spontaneously self-organises in vitro to form structurally authentic LHCIIb upon reconstituting the unfolded recombinant protein with the pigments chlorophyll a, b, and carotenoids in detergent micelles. Former measurements of LHCIIb assembly had revealed two apparent kinetic phases, a faster one (tau1) in the range of 10 s to 1 min, and a slower one (tau2) in the range of several min. To unravel the sequence of events we analysed the binding of chlorophylls into the complex by using time-resolved fluorescence measurements of resonance energy transfer from chlorophylls to an acceptor dye attached to the apoprotein. Chlorophyll a, offered in the absence of chlorophyll b, bound with the faster kinetics (tau1) exclusively whereas chlorophyll b, in the absence of chlorophyll a, bound predominantly with the slower kinetics (tau2). In double-jump experiments, LHCIIb assembly could be dissected into a faster chlorophyll a and a subsequent, predominantly slower chlorophyll b-binding step. The assignment of the faster and the slower kinetic phase to predominantly chlorophyll a and exclusively chlorophyll b binding, respectively, was verified by analysing the assembly kinetics with a circular dichroism signal in the visible domain presumably reflecting the establishment of pigment-pigment interactions. We propose that slow chlorophyll binding is confined to the exclusively chlorophyll b binding sites whereas faster binding occurs to the chlorophyll a binding sites. The latter sites can bind both chlorophylls a and b but in a reversible fashion as long as the complex is not stabilised by proper occupation of the chlorophyll b sites. The resulting two-step model of LHCIIb assembly is able to reconcile the highly specific binding sites containing either chlorophyll a or b, as seen in the recent crystal structures of LHCIIb, with the observation of promiscuous binding sites able to bind both chlorophyll a and b in numerous reconstitution analyses of LHCIIb assembly.     

The nature of a chlorophyll ligand in Lhca proteins determines the far red fluorescence emission typical of photosystem I

Photosystem I of higher plants is characterized by a typically long wavelength fluorescence emission associated to its light-harvesting complex I moiety. The origin of these low energy chlorophyll spectral forms was investigated by using site-directed mutagenesis of Lhca1-4 genes and in vitro reconstitution into recombinant pigment-protein complexes. We showed that the red-shifted absorption originates from chlorophyll-chlorophyll (Chl) excitonic interactions involving Chl A5 in each of the four Lhca antenna complexes. An essential requirement for the presence of the red-shifted absorption/fluorescence spectral forms was the presence of asparagine as a ligand for the Chl a chromophore in the binding site A5 of Lhca complexes. In Lhca3 and Lhca4, which exhibit the most red-shifted red forms, its substitution by histidine maintains the pigment binding and, yet, the red spectral forms are abolished. Conversely, in Lhca1, having very low amplitude of red forms, the substitution of Asn for His produces a red shift of the fluorescence emission, thus confirming that the nature of the Chl A5 ligand determines the correct organization of chromophores leading to the excitonic interaction responsible for the red-most forms. The red-shifted fluorescence emission at 730 nm is here proposed to originate from an absorption band at approximately 700 nm, which represents the low energy contribution of an excitonic interaction having the high energy band at 683 nm. Because the mutation does not affect Chl A5 orientation, we suggest that coordination by Asn of Chl A5 holds it at the correct distance with Chl B5.     

Excitation spectra of chlorophyll fluorescence in spinach and barley chloroplasts at 4 K

Excitation spectra of chlorophyll a fluorescence in chloroplasts from spinach and barley were measured at 4.2 K. The spectra showed about the same resolution as the corresponding absorption spectra. Excitation spectra for long-wave chlorophyll a emission (738 or 733 nm) indicate that the main absorption maximum of the photosystem (PS) I complex is at 680 nm, with minor bands at longer wavelengths. From the corresponding excitation spectra it was concluded that the emission bands at 686 and 695 nm both originate from the PS II complex. The main absorption bands of this complex were at 676 and 684 nm. The PS I and PS II excitation spectra both showed a contribution by the light-harvesting chlorophyll $\text{a}\text{b}$ protein(s), but direct energy transfer from PS II to PS I was not observed at 4 K. Omission of Mg²⁺ from the suspension favored energy transfer from the light-harvesting protein to PS I. Excitation spectra of a chlorophyll b-less mutant of barley showed an average efficiency of 50–60% for energy transfer from β-carotene to chlorophyll a in the PS I and in the PS II complexes.     

Protein-protein interactions of light-harvesting pigment protein from spinach chloroplasts. I.Ca-2+ binding and its relation to protein association.

The role of divalent cations in the regulation of the distribution of excitation energy between the two photosystems involved in green plants photosynthesis has led us to search for a better understanding of how such phenomena might occur at the molecular level. Since small changes in orientation of and distance between pigment molecules could greatly affect the distribution of excitation energy, we have decided to study the effects of ions on the light-harvesting pigment protein from spinach chloroplasts. The light-harvesting pigment protein is shown to have two types of binding sites for Ca-2+. Binding studies and analytical ultracentrifugation indicate that site I (K-d equals 2.5 mu-M, n equals 1.5-4.0 mu-mol Ca-2+ bound/mg chlorophyll) is lost as the protein associates. Site II (K-d equals 32 mu-M, n equals 9,5 mu-mol Ca-2+/mg chlorophyll) is not affected by the association of the protein. This site is responsible, however, for a further divalent cation-dependent association of the protein. The possible role of this protein in grana stacking and control of spillover is discussed.     

Early steps in the assembly of light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b complex: time-resolved fluorescence measurements

The light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b complex (LHCIIb) spontaneously assembles from its pigment and protein components in detergent solution. The formation of functional LHCIIb can be detected in time-resolved experiments by monitoring the establishment of excitation energy transfer from protein-bound chlorophyll b to chlorophyll a. To detect the possible initial steps of chlorophyll binding that may not yet give rise to chlorophyll b-to-a energy transfer, we have monitored LHCIIb assembly by measuring excitation energy transfer from a fluorescent dye, covalently bound to the protein, to the chlorophylls. In order to exclude interference of the dye with protein folding or pigment binding, the experiments were repeated with the dye bound to four different positions in the protein. Initial chlorophyll binding occurs at roughly the same rate as the establishment of chlorophyll b-to-a energy transfer, in the range of 10 s. However, under limiting chlorophyll concentrations, the binding of chlorophyll a clearly precedes that of chlorophyll b. The complex containing the apoprotein, carotenoids, and chlorophyll a but no chlorophyll b is biochemically unstable and therefore cannot be isolated. However, chlorophyll a binding into this weak complex is specific, as it does not occur with a C-terminal deletion mutant of Lhcb1 which still contains most chlorophyll-ligating amino acids but is unable to fold and assemble into functional LHCIIb. As a scenario for LHCIIb assembly in the thylakoid, we propose the initial formation of a labile Lhcb1-chlorophyll a-carotenoid complex that then becomes stabilized by the binding (or formation in situ) of chlorophyll b.     

A Mechanism of Energy Dissipation in Cyanobacteria

When grown under a variety of stress conditions, cyanobacteria express the isiA gene, which encodes the IsiA pigment-protein complex. Overexpression of the isiA gene under iron-depletion stress conditions leads to the formation of large IsiA aggregates, which display remarkably short fluorescence lifetimes and thus a strong capacity to dissipate energy. In this work we investigate the underlying molecular mechanism responsible for chlorophyll fluorescence quenching. Femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy allowed us to follow the process of energy dissipation in real time. The light energy harvested by chlorophyll pigments migrated within the system and eventually reaches a quenching site where the energy is transferred to a carotenoid-excited state, which dissipates it by decaying to the ground state. We compare these findings with those obtained for the main light-harvesting complex in green plants (light-harvesting complex II) and artificial light-harvesting antennas, and conclude that all of these systems show the same mechanism of energy dissipation, i.e., one or more carotenoids act as energy dissipators by accepting energy via low-lying singlet-excited S₁ states and dissipating it as heat.     

Absorption spectra of chlorophyll a and b in Lhcb protein environment

The spectral forms of the two chlorophyll species in higher plant Photosystem II antenna proteins have been experimentally determined within their protein environment. Recombinant CP29 and LHC II antenna proteins missing individual chromophores were obtained by over-expression in bacteria without any changing of the primary protein sequence and in vitro reconstitution. Difference absorption spectroscopy with respect to the corresponding proteins binding the complete pigment complement yielded the spectral shape and extinction of single chlorophyll a and b. A functional relation of their absorption was given by Gaussian subband decomposition covering the entire Q_x and Q_y optical region together with the absolute value of the molar extinction coefficient. With respect to analogous determinations reported in the literature for organic solvents, this information is valuable for further understanding the in-protein chlorophyll excited states and excited state dynamics: in particular, for the calculation of Förster transfer rates by means of chlorophyll–chlorophyll overlap integral employing the Stepanov relation for emission and single chromophore transition energies according to the results of mutational analysis of chlorophyll binding sites [Bassi et al. (1999) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 10056–10061; Remelli et al. (1999) J Biol Chem 274: 33510–33521].     

Effects of cations upon chloroplast membrane subunit interactions and excitation energy distribution

When isolated chloroplasts from mature pea (Pisum sativum) leaves were treated with digitonin under “low salt” conditions, the membranes were extensively solubilized into small subunits (as evidenced by analysis with small pore ultrafilters). From this solubilized preparation, a photochemically inactive chlorophyll · protein complex (chlorophyll $\text{a}\text{b}$ ratio, 1.3) was isolated. We suggest that the detergent-derived membrane fragment from mature membranes is a structural complex within the membrane which contains the light-harvesting chlorophyll $\text{a}\text{b}$ protein and which acts as a light-harvesting antenna primarily for Photosystem II.Cations dramatically alter the structural interaction of the light-harvesting complex with the photochemically active system II complex. This interaction has been measured by determining the amount of protein-bound chlorophyll b and Photosystem II activity which can be released into dispersed subunits by digitonin treatment of chloroplast lamellae. When cations are present to cause interaction between the Photosystem II complex and the light-harvesting pigment · protein, the combined complexes pellet as a “heavy” membranous fraction during differential centrifugation of detergent treated lamellae. In the absence of cations, the two complexes dissociate and can be isolated in a “light” submembrane preparation from which the light-harvesting complex can be purified by sucrose gradient centrifugation.Cation effects on excitation energy distribution between Photosystems I and II have been monitored by following Photosystem II fluorescence changes under chloroplast incubation conditions identical to those used for detergent treatment (with the exception of chlorophyll concentration differences and omission of detergents). The cation dependency of the pigment · protein complex and Photosystem II reaction center interactions measured by detergent fractionation, and regulation of excitation energy distribution as measured by fluorescence changes, were identical. We conclude that changes in substructural organization of intact membranes, involving cation induced changes in the interaction of intramembranous subunits, are the primary factors regulating the distribution of excitation energy between Photosystems II and I.     

Novel aspects of chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins

The light-harvesting proteins (LHC) constitute a multigene family including, in higher plants, at least 12 members whose location, within the photosynthetic membrane, relative abundance and putative function appear to be very different. The major light-harvesting complex of photosystem II (LHCII) is the most abundant membrane protein in the biosphere and fulfil a constitutive light-harvesting function for photosystem II while the early light-induced proteins (ELIPs) are expressed in low amounts under stress conditions. Primary sequence analysis suggests that all these proteins share a common structure which was resolved at 3.7 Å resolution by electron crystallography in the case of the major LHCII complex: Three transmembrane helices connected by hydrophilic loops coordinate seven chlorophyll a and five chlorophyll b molecules by histidine, glutamine, asparagine lateral chains as well as by charge compensated ionic pairs of glutamic acid and arginine residues; moreover, at least two xantophyll molecules are located at the centre of the structure in close contact with seven porphyrins, tentatively identified as chlorophyll a. The antenna system is also involved in the regulation of excitation energy transfer to reaction centre II. This function has been attributed to three members of the protein family, namely CP29, CP26 and CP24 (also called minor chlorophyll proteins) which have been recently characterised and shown to bind most of the xantophyll cycle carotenoids, thus suggesting that the non-photochemical quenching mechanism is acting in these proteins. Further support to this assignment comes from the recent identification of protonation sites in CP29 and CP26 by covalent dicyclohexhylcarbodiimide binding suggesting that these respond to low lumenal pH. In addition, CP29 is reversibly phosphorylated under light and cold stress conditions, undergoing conformational change, supporting the hypothesis that these subunits, present in low amounts in photosystem II, have a major regulatory role in the light-harvesting function and are thus important in environmental stress resistance.     

500 MHz 1H NMR of chlorophylls in the major light-harvesting chlorophyll-protein complex of photosystem II

500 MHz 1H NMR spectra were obtained of solutions containing oligomeric and monomeric forms of Chl a/b-P2, the major light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-protein complex of photosystem II, isolated from thylakoid membranes of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Oligomers showed only a broad unresolved spectrum, but for monomers several downfield-shifted chlorophyll proton resonances were observed, assigned to the alpha and beta methine protons and the formyl proton of Chl-b. Identifying the observed shifts as ring-current shifts, these NMR data can be matched with previously obtained optical data confirming the trimeric arrangement of Chl-b in Chl a/b-P2 protein, with a distance between the chromophore centers of approximately 12 A.     

A structural investigation of the central chlorophyll a binding sites in the minor photosystem II antenna protein, Lhcb4

Mutant proteins from light-harvesting complexes of higher plants may be obtained by expressing modified apoproteins in Escherichia coli, and reconstituting them in the presence of chlorophyll and carotenoid cofactors. This method has allowed, in particular, the engineering of mutant LHCs in which each of the residues coordinating the central Mg atoms of the chlorophylls was replaced by noncoordinating amino acids [Bassi, R., Croce, R., Cugini, D., and Sandonà, D. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 10056-10061]. The availability of these mutants is of particular importance for determining the precise position of absorption bands for the different chlorophyll molecules, as well as the sequence of energy transfer events that occur within LHC complexes, provided that the structural impact of each mutation is precisely evaluated. Using resonance Raman spectroscopy, we have characterized the pigment-protein interactions in the minor photosystem II antenna protein, Lhcb4 (CP29), in which each of three of the four central chlorophyll a molecules has been removed by such mutations. By comparing the spectra of these mutants with those of the wild-type protein, the state of interaction of the carbonyl group, the coordination state of the central magnesium ion, and the dielectric constant (polarity) of the immediate environment in the binding pocket of the chlorophyll a molecule were defined for each cofactor binding site. In addition, the structural impact of the absence of one chlorophyll a molecule and the quality of protein folding were evaluated for each of these mutated polypeptides.     

Chloroplast phosphoproteins. Phosphorylation of polypeptides of the light-harvesting chlorophyll protein complex.

When isolated, intact chloroplasts of pea (Pisum sativum) are incubated in the light with [32P]-orthophosphate, isotope is incorporated into several polypeptides. Among the most conspicuous phosphoproteins are two which form a very closely spaced doublet on dodecyl sulphate/polyacrylamide gels and co-electrophorese with the major polypeptide component of the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b binding complex. Like the light-harvesting polypeptide, the phosphoprotein doublet is bound to thylakoids, sediments with the heavy particles released from thylakoids after digitonin treatment, is soluble in chloroform/methanol and has an apparent molecular weight of about 26 000. The doublet also appears in the highly purified light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b binding complex isolated from thylakoids by hydrosylapatite chromatography. I conclude that two polypeptide components of the complex are phosphorylated. One of these components may be the major light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b binding protein.     

Relation between the mode of binding of nitrite and the energy distribution between the two photosystems

The reversibility of nitrite-induced inhibition in relation to energy distribution between the two photosystems was studied in spinach thylakoid membranes. Measurements of electron transfer rate catalyzed by photosystem I (PS I) and photosystem II (PS II), chlorophyll a (Chl a ) fluorescence induction kinetics, S₂ state multiline spectra, and room temperature electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signals indicated that nitrite anions bind PS II in two ways: dissociable (loose) and non-dissociable (tight). The inhibition caused by the dissociable binding was reversible in washed (nitrite-treated samples washed with nitrite-free medium) samples, while the inhibition caused by the non-dissociable binding was irreversible. At 77 K, an increase in absorption cross section of PS I (as inferred from the excitation spectra of Chl a fluorescence) and a decrease in absorption cross section of PS II in nitrite-treated sample when compared with sample washed with nitrite-free medium and control sample suggested that nitrite plays a role in regulating the distribution of absorbed excitation energy between the two photosystems. We propose, for the first time, that the removal of loosely bound nitrite leads to migration of light-harvesting complex II back to the PS II, and thus the mode of binding of nitrite regulates the extent of migration of antenna molecules between the two photosystems.     

Functional assembly in vitro of phycobilisomes with isolated photosystem II particles of eukaryotic chloroplasts

Phycobiliproteins obtained by dissociation of phycobilisomes were reassociated in vitro with intact thylakoids or isolated photosystems I and II preparations obtained from cyanophytes (prokaryotes) or green algae (eukaryotes) to form bound phycobilisome complexes. Energy transfer from Fremyella diplosiphon phycobiliproteins to chlorophyll a of reaction centers I and II was measured in: complexes containing intact thylakoids of the cyanophytes F. diplosiphon or Anacystis nidulans and the eukaryotic algae Euglena gracilis and mutants of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii; complexes containing isolated photosystem II particles of A. nidulans or C. reinhardtii; and complexes containing reaction center I of F. diplosiphon or C. reinhardtii. Energy transfer from phycoerythrin to chlorophyll a of photosystem II could be demonstrated in complexes containing phycobilisomes bound to cyanophyte thylakoids or isolated photosystem II particles of A. nidulans or C. reinhardtii. Bound phycobilisomes did not transfer energy to photosystem II within green algae thylakoids containing altered forms of light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-protein complex (LHC) II antenna, reduced amounts of LHC II, or chlorophyll b, or chlorophyll b-less mutants, nor to chlorophyll a of photosystem I of intact thylakoids or isolated reaction centers. We conclude that phycobilisomes can form a specific and functional association with photosystem II particles of both cyanophytes and eukaryotic thylakoids. This interaction appears to be hindered by the presence of LHC II antenna in the eukaryotic thylakoids.     

Protein-Protein interactions of light-harvesting pigment protein from spinach chloroplasts. I. Ca binding and its relation to protein association

The role of divalent cations in the regulation of the distribution of excitation energy between the two photosystems involved in green plant photosynthesis has led us to search for a better understanding of how such phenomena might occur at the molecular level. Since small changes in orientation of and distance between pigment molecules could greatly affect the distribution of excitation energy, we have decided to study the effects of ions on the light-harvesting pigment protein from spinach chloroplasts. The light-harvesting pigment protein is shown to have two types of binding sites for Ca²⁺. Binding studies and analytical ultracentrifugation indicate that site I (K_d = 2.5 μM, n = 1.5−4.0 μmol Ca²⁺ bound/mg chlorophyll) is lost as the protein associates. Site II (K_d = 32 μM, n = 9.5 μmol Ca²⁺/mg chlorophyll) is not affected by the association of the protein. This site is responsible, however, for a further divalent cation-dependent association of the protein. The possible role of this protein in grana stacking and control of spillover is discussed.