Specificity of Inhibition of ras-p21 Signal Transduction by Peptides from GTPase Activating Protein (GAP) and the Son-of Sevenless (SOS) ras-Specific Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Protein

In previous studies, involving molecular modeling of wild-type and oncogenic forms of the ras-p21 protein bound to GTPase activating protein GAP and the ras-specific guanine nucleotide exchange-promoting protein, SOS, we identified specific domains of GAP and SOS proteins that differ in conformation when the computed average structures of the corresponding wild-type and oncogenic complexes are superimposed. Additionally, in these previous studies, we have synthesized peptides corresponding to these domains and found that all of them inhibit either or both oncogenic (Val 12-containing) p21- and insulin-activated wild-type p21-induced oocyte maturation. To document further the specificity of the inhibition of these peptides for the ras signal transduction pathway, we have now tested their effects on progesterone-induced maturation that occurs by a ras-independent pathway. None of these peptides, including a peptide corresponding to residues 980–989 of SOS that completely blocks oncogenic p21-induced maturation and also causes extensive inhibition of insulin-induced maturation, affects progesterone-induced maturation, suggesting that all of these peptides are specific for the ras pathway. Since our approach to the design of peptides that can inhibit oncogenic ras-p21 selectively is based on identifying domains that differ in conformation between oncogenic and wild-type complexes, we have now further synthesized peptides that correspond to domains of GAP (residues 903–910) and SOS (residues 792–804) that do not differ in conformation when the average structures are superimposed. These peptides do not inhibit either oncogenic p21- or insulin-induced oocyte maturation, supporting the overall strategy of using peptides from domains that change conformation as the ones most likely to inhibit oncogenic and/or wild-type ras-p21. These results further support the specificity of inhibition of the GAP and SOS peptides from the conformationally distinct domains of both proteins.     

An Effector Peptide from Glutathione-S-Transferase-pi Strongly and Selectively Blocks Mitotic Signaling by Oncogenic ras-p21

Oncogenic ras-p21 directly activates jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK) and its substrate, jun as a unique step on its mitogenic signal transduction pathway. This activation is blocked by the specific JNK-jun inhibitor, glutathione-S-transferase-pi (GST-pi). Four domains of GST-pi have been implicated in this regulatory function: 34-50, 99-121, 165-182, and 194-201. The 34-50 domain is unique in that it does not affect GST-pi binding to JNK-jun but blocks jun phosphorylation by JNK. We now find that it completely blocks oncogenic (Val 12-) ras-p21-induced oocyte maturation but has no effect on insulin-induced oocyte maturation. Because the latter process requires activation of wild-type ras-p21, this peptide appears to be specific for inhibiting only the oncogenic form of ras-p21, suggesting its use in treating ras-induced tumors.     

Evidence that oocyte maturation induced by an oncogenic ras-p21 protein and insulin is mediated by overlapping yet distinct mechanisms.

We have recently shown that a peptide (residues 35-47) from a functional region of the ras p21 protein, thought to be involved in the binding of p21 to GTPase activating protein, the antibiotic azatyrosine, known to induce the ras-recision gene, and the selective protein kinase C inhibitor, CGP 41,251, all inhibit oncogenic p21 protein-induced maturation of oocytes in a dose-dependent manner. We now show that these three agents only partially inhibit insulin-induced oocyte maturation, known to be dependent on activation of cellular p21 protein. On the other hand, the anti-p21 protein antibody Y13-259 completely inhibits both insulin- and oncogenic p21 protein-induced maturation as does a tetrapeptide, CVIM, known to block the enzyme farnesyl transferase which covalently attaches the farnesyl moiety to the p21 protein allowing it to attach to the cell membrane. Our results suggest that while the oncogenic and insulin-activated normal p21 proteins share certain elements of their signal transduction pathways in common, these pathways diverge and allow for selective inhibition of the oncogenic pathway.     

Loop Domain Peptides from the SOS ras-Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Protein, Identified from Molecular Dynamics Calculations, Strongly Inhibit ras Signaling

In the accompanying paper, we found, using molecular dynamics calculations, four domains of the ras-specific SOS guanine nucleotide exchange protein (residues 589-601, 654-675, 746-761, and 980-989) that differ markedly in conformation when SOS is complexed with either oncogenic (Val 12-) ras-p21 or wild-type ras-p21. Three of these domains contain three crystallographically undefined loops that we modeled in these calculations, and one is a newly identified non-loop domain containing SOS residues 980-989. We have now synthesized peptides corresponding to these four domains and find that all of them block Val 12-ras-p21-induced oocyte maturation. All of them also block insulin-induced oocyte maturation, but two of these peptides, corresponding to SOS residues 589-601 and 980-989, block oncogenic ras to a significantly greater extent. These results suggest that SOS contains domains, including the three loop domains, that are important for ras signaling and that several of these domains can activate different pathways specific to oncogenic or wild-type ras-p21.     

Evidence that oocyte maturation induced by an oncogenic ras-p21 protein and insulin is mediated by overlapping yet distinct mechanisms

We have recently shown that a peptide (residues 35–47) from a functional region of the ras p21 protein, thought to be involved in the binding of p21 to GTPase activating protein, the antibiotic azatyrosine, known to induce the ras-recision gene, and the selective protein kinase C inhibitor, CGP 41 251, all inhibit oncogenic p21 protein-induced maturation of oocytes in a dose-dependent manner. We now show that these three agents only partially inhibit insulin-induced oocyte maturation, known to be dependent on activation of cellular p21 protein. On the other hand, the anti-p21 protein antibody Y13–259 completely inhibits both insulin- and oncogenic p21 protein-induced maturation as does a tetrapeptide, CVIM, known to block the enzyme farnesyl transferase which covalently attaches the farnesyl moiety to the p21 protein allowing it to attach to the cell membrane. Our results suggest that while the oncogenic and insulin-activated normal p21 proteins share certain elements of their signal transduction pathways in common, these pathways diverge and allow for selective inhibition of the oncogenic pathway.     

Identification of the Site of Inhibition of Oncogenic ras–p21-Induced Signal Transduction by a Peptide from a ras Effector Domain

We have previously found that a peptide corresponding to residues 35–47 of the ras-p21 protein, from its switch 1 effector domain region, strongly inhibits oocyte maturation induced by oncogenic p21, but not by insulin-activated cellular wild-type p21. Another ras–p21 peptide corresponding to residues 96–110 that blocks ras–jun and jun kinase (JNK) interactions exhibits a similar pattern of inhibition. We have also found that c-raf strongly induces oocyte maturation and that dominant negative c-raf strongly blocks oncogenic p21-induced oocyte maturation. We now find that the p21 35–47, but not the 96–110, peptide completely blocks c-raf-induced maturation. This finding suggests that the 35–47 peptide blocks oncogenic ras at the level of raf; that activated normal and oncogenic ras–p21 have differing requirements for raf-dependent signaling; and that the two oncogenic-ras-selective inhibitory peptides, 35–47 and 96–110, act at two different critical downstream sites, the former at raf, the latter at JNK/jun, both of which are required for oncogenic ras-p21 signaling.     

Differences in patterns of activation of MAP kinases induced by oncogenic ras-p21 and insulin in oocytes

Oncogenic ras (Val 12-containing)-p21 protein induces oocyte maturation by a pathway that is blocked by peptides from effector domains of ras-p21, i.e., residues 35-47 (that block Val 12-p21-activated raf) and 96-110 and 115-126, which do not affect the ability of insulin-activated cellular p21 to induce maturation. Oncogenic p21 binds directly to jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK), which is blocked by the p21 96-110 and 115-126 peptides. This finding predicts that oncogenic p21, but not insulin, induces maturation by early and sustained activation of JNK. We now directly confirm this prediction by showing that oncogenic p21 induces activating phosphorylation of JNK (JNK-P) and of ERK (MAP kinase) (MAPK-P), whose levels correlate with oocyte maturation. p21 peptides 35-47 and 96-110 block formation of JNK-P and MAPK-P, further confirming this correlation and suggesting, unexpectedly, that raf-MEK-MAPK and JNK-jun pathways strongly interact on the oncogenic p21 pathway. In contrast, insulin activates only low levels of JNK-P, and, surprisingly, we find that insulin induces only low levels of MAPK-P, indicating that insulin and activated normal p21 utilize MAP kinase-independent signal transduction pathways.     

Inhibition of Oncogenic and Activated Wild-Type ras–p21 Protein-Induced Oocyte Maturation by Peptides from the Guanine-Nucleotide Exchange Protein, SOS, Identified from Molecular Dynamics Calculations. Selective Inhibition of Oncogenic ras–p21

In the preceding paper we performed molecular dynamics calculations of the average structures of the SOS protein bound to wild-type and oncogenic ras–p21. Based on these calculations, we have identified four major domains of the SOS protein, consisting of residues 631–641, 676–691, 718–729, and 994–1004, which differ in structure between the two complexes. We have now microinjected synthetic peptides corresponding to each of these domains into Xenopus laevis oocytes either together with oncogenic (Val 12)-p21 or into oocytes subsequently incubated with insulin. We find that the first three peptides inhibit both oncogenic and wild-type p21-induced oocyte maturation, while the last peptide much more strongly inhibits oncogenic p21 protein-induced oocyte maturation. These results suggest that each identified SOS region is involved in ras–stimulated signal transduction and that the 994–1004 domain is involved uniquely with oncogenic ras–p21 signaling.     

Inhibition of oncogenic and activated wild-type ras-p21 protein-induced oocyte maturation by peptides from the guanine-nucleotide exchange protein, SOS, identified from molecular dynamics calculations. Selective inhibition of oncogenic ras-p21

In the preceding paper we performed molecular dynamics calculations of the average structures of the SOS protein bound to wild-type and oncogenic ras–p21. Based on these calculations, we have identified four major domains of the SOS protein, consisting of residues 631–641, 676–691, 718–729, and 994–1004, which differ in structure between the two complexes. We have now microinjected synthetic peptides corresponding to each of these domains into Xenopus laevis oocytes either together with oncogenic (Val 12)-p21 or into oocytes subsequently incubated with insulin. We find that the first three peptides inhibit both oncogenic and wild-type p21-induced oocyte maturation, while the last peptide much more strongly inhibits oncogenic p21 protein-induced oocyte maturation. These results suggest that each identified SOS region is involved in ras–stimulated signal transduction and that the 994–1004 domain is involved uniquely with oncogenic ras–p21 signaling.     

Functional interactions of Raf and MEK with Jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK) result in a positive feedback loop on the oncogenic Ras signaling pathway

In previous studies we have found that oncogenic (Val 12)-ras-p21 induces Xenopus laevis oocyte maturation that is selectively blocked by two ras-p21 peptides, 35-47, also called PNC-7, that blocks its interaction with raf, and 96-110, also called PNC-2, that blocks its interaction with jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK). Each peptide blocks activation of both JNK and MAP kinase (MAPK or ERK) suggesting interaction between the raf-MEK-ERK and JNK-jun pathways. We further found that dominant negative raf blocks JNK induction of oocyte maturation, again suggesting cross-talk between pathways. In this study, we have undertaken to determine where these points of cross-talk occur. First, we have immunoprecipitated injected Val 12-Ha-ras-p21 from oocytes and found that a complex forms between ras-p21 raf, MEK, MAPK, and JNK. Co-injection of either peptide, but not a control peptide, causes diminished binding of ras-p21, raf, and JNK. Thus, one site of interaction is cooperative binding of Val 12-ras-p21 to raf and JNK. Second, we have injected JNK, c-raf, and MEK into oocytes alone and in the presence of raf and MEK inhibitors and found that JNK activation is independent of the raf-MEK-MAPK pathway but that activated JNK activates raf, allowing for activation of ERK. Furthermore, we have found that constitutively activated MEK activates JNK. We have corroborated these findings in studies with isolated protein components from a human astrocyte (U-251) cell line; that is, JNK phosphorylates raf but not the reverse; MEK phosphorylates JNK but not the reverse. We further have found that JNK does not phosphorylate MAPK and that MAPK does not phosphorylate JNK. The stress-inducing agent, anisomycin, causes activation of JNK, raf, MEK, and ERK in this cell line; activation of JNK is not inhibitable by the MEK inhibitor, U0126, while activation of raf, MEK, and ERK are blocked by this agent. These results suggest that activated JNK can, in turn, activate not only jun but also raf that, in turn, activates MEK that can then cross-activate JNK in a positive feedback loop.     

Identification, using molecular dynamics, of an effector domain of the ras-binding domain of the raf-p74 protein that is uniquely involved in oncogenic ras-p21 signaling

By comparing the average structures, computed using molecular dynamics, of the ras-binding domain of raf (RBD) bound to activated wild-type ras-p21 and its homologous inhibitory protein, rap-1A, we formerly identified three domains of the RBD that changed conformation between the two complexes, residues 62–76, 97–110, and 111–121. We found that one synthetic peptide, corresponding to RBD residues 97–110, selectively inhibited oncogenic ras-p21-induced oocyte maturation. In this study, we performed molecular dynamics on the Val 12-ras-p21-RBD complex and compared its average structure with that for the wild-type protein. We find that there is a large displacement of a loop involving these residues when the structures of the two complexes are compared. This result corroborates our former finding that the RBD 97–110 peptide inhibits only signal transduction by oncogenic ras-p21 and suggests that oncogenic p21 uses this loop to interact with raf in a unique manner.     

Identification of the site of inhibition of oncogenic ras-p21-induced signal transduction by a peptide from a ras effector domain

We have previously found that a peptide corresponding to residues 35–47 of the ras-p21 protein, from its switch 1 effector domain region, strongly inhibits oocyte maturation induced by oncogenic p21, but not by insulin-activated cellular wild-type p21. Another ras–p21 peptide corresponding to residues 96–110 that blocks ras–jun and jun kinase (JNK) interactions exhibits a similar pattern of inhibition. We have also found that c-raf strongly induces oocyte maturation and that dominant negative c-raf strongly blocks oncogenic p21-induced oocyte maturation. We now find that the p21 35–47, but not the 96–110, peptide completely blocks c-raf-induced maturation. This finding suggests that the 35–47 peptide blocks oncogenic ras at the level of raf; that activated normal and oncogenic ras–p21 have differing requirements for raf-dependent signaling; and that the two oncogenic-ras-selective inhibitory peptides, 35–47 and 96–110, act at two different critical downstream sites, the former at raf, the latter at JNK/jun, both of which are required for oncogenic ras-p21 signaling.     

Identification of the site of inhibition of mitogenic signaling by oncogenic ras-p21 by a ras effector peptide

We have previously found that a ras switch 1 domain peptide (PNC-7, residues 35–47) selectively blocks oocyte maturation induced by oncogenic (Val 12–containing) ras-p21 protein and also blocks c-raf–induced oocyte maturation. We now find that oncogenic ras-p21 does not inhibit oocyte maturation of a constitutively activated raf protein (raf BXB) that is lacking most of the first 301 amino terminal amino acids, including the major ras binding domain and accessory ras-binding regions. We also find that a dominant negative raf that completely blocks c-raf–induced maturation likewise does not block raf-BXB–induced maturation. We conclude that PNC-7 blocks ras by binding to the amino-terminal domain of raf and that raf BXB must initiate signal transduction in the cytosol.     

Insulin induction of Xenopus laevis oocyte maturation is inhibited by monoclonal antibody against p21 ras proteins.

Microinjection of transforming p21 ras protein induces maturation of Xenopus laevis oocytes, and the induction is blocked by coinjection of monoclonal antibody (Y13-259) against p21 ras proteins. Similar to other inducing agents, the effect of p21 ras protein is mediated via the appearance of maturation or meiosis-promoting factor activity. In addition, the neutralizing antibody markedly reduces oocyte maturation after insulin induction, whereas it fails to inhibit progesterone induction. Our results suggest that insulin induces maturation of oocytes via a different pathway than that of steroidal agents. The induction by insulin is ras dependent, and the action of ras may be directed at the steps before meiosis-promoting factor autocatalytic activation. These results suggest a role of p21 ras protein in the events associated with amphibian oocyte maturation.     

Hormone- and phorbol ester-activated protein kinase C isozymes mediate a reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton associated with prolactin secretion in GH4C1 cells.

TRH regulates PRL secretion and synthesis in GH4C1 rat pituitary cells. TRH responses are associated with activation of protein kinase C (PKC) isozymes and elevation of cytosolic calcium. To determine which PKC isozymes are involved in TRH-directed responses, we evaluated the effect of TRH on GH cell alpha-, beta-, delta-, and epsilon-PKC isozymes. Immunoblot analysis demonstrated that TRH caused rapid redistribution of all isozymes to a Triton X-100-insoluble (i.e. cytoskeletal) fraction. Corollary immunocytofluorescence studies demonstrated that redistributed PKCs accumulate in cell peripheries. Exocytosis involves reorganization of the cytoskeleton, therefore, each of the GH cell PKCs is appropriately located to phosphorylate proteins important for cytoskeleton organization. To determine the relative contributions of calcium and PKC signal transduction pathways in mediating TRH responses, the effects of potassium depolarization (which increases cytosolic calcium) and phorbol dibutyrate (which activates all PKC isozymes without increasing calcium) were compared. The data indicate that TRH-mediated reorganization of vinculin proceeds via a calcium-mediated pathway, whereas fragmentation of actin filaments proceeds via a PKC-dependent pathway. Selective down-modulation of epsilon-PKC with prolonged TRH-treatment was used to demonstrate that epsilon-PKC is not necessary for certain TRH-stimulated biological responses.     

Activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase, ERK2, by p21ras oncoprotein.

To examine signal transduction events activated by oncogenic p21ras, we have studied kinases that are activated following the scrape loading of p21ras into quiescent cells. We observe rapid activation of 42 kDa and 46 kDa protein kinases. The 42 kDa kinase is the mitogen and extracellular-signal regulated kinase ERK2, (MAP2 kinase), which is activated by phosphorylation on tyrosine and threonine in response to oncogenic p21ras, while the 46 kDa kinase is likely to be another member of the ERK family. Stimulation of these kinases by oncogenic p21ras does not require the presence of growth factors, showing that oncogenic p21ras uncouples kinase activation from external signals. In ras transformed cell lines, these kinases are constitutively activated. We propose that the kinases are important components of the signal transduction pathway activated by p21ras oncoprotein.     

Regulation of tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate-induced responses in NIH 3T3 cells by GAP, the GTPase-activating protein associated with p21c-ras.

Proteins of the ras family of oncogenes have been implicated in signal transduction pathways initiated by protein kinase C (PKC) and by tyrosine kinase oncogenes and receptors, but the role that ras plays in these diverse signalling systems is poorly defined. The activity of ras proteins has been shown to be controlled in part by a cellular protein, GAP (GTPase-activating protein), that negatively regulates p21c-ras by enhancing its intrinsic GTPase activity. Thus, overexpression of GAP provides a tool for determining the step(s) in signal transduction dependent on p21c-ras activity. In this paper, we report that overexpression of GAP blocks the phorbol ester (tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate [TPA])-induced activation of p42 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p42mapk), c-fos expression, and DNA synthesis. GAP overexpression did not block responses to serum or fluoroaluminate. Moreover, not all biochemical events elicited by TPA were affected by GAP overexpression, as increased glucose uptake and phosphorylation of MARCKS, a major PKC substrate, occurred normally. Reduction of GAP expression to near normal levels restored the ability of the cells to activate p42mapk in response to TPA. These findings suggest that ras and GAP together play a key role in a PKC-dependent signal transduction pathway which leads to p42mapk activation and cell proliferation.     

Activation of intracellular kinases in Xenopus oocytes by p21ras and phospholipases: a comparative study.

Signal transduction induced by generations of second messengers from membrane phospholipids is a major regulatory mechanism in the control of cell proliferation. Indeed, oncogenic p21ras alters the intracellular levels of phospholipid metabolites in both mammalian cells and Xenopus oocytes. However, it is still controversial whether this alteration it is biologically significant. We have analyzed the ras-induced signal transduction pathway in Xenopus oocytes and have correlated its mechanism of activation with that of the three most relevant phospholipases (PLs). After microinjection, ras-p21 induces a rapid PLD activation followed by a late PLA2 activation. By contrast, phosphatidylcholine-specific PLC was not activated under similar conditions. When each of these PLs was studied for its ability to activate intracellular signalling kinases, all of them were found to activate maturation-promoting factor efficiently. However, only PLD was able to activate MAP kinase and S6 kinase II, a similar pattern to that induced by p21ras proteins. Thus, the comparison of activated enzymes after microinjection of p21ras or PLs indicated that only PLD microinjection mimetized p21ras signalling. Finally, inhibition of the endogenous PLD activity by neomycin substantially reduced the biological activity of p21ras. All these results suggest that PLD activation may constitute a relevant step in ras-induced germinal vesicle breakdown in Xenopus oocytes.     

Oncogenic ras protein induces meiotic maturation of amphibian oocytes in the presence of protein synthesis inhibitors

Microinjection of the activated ras oncogenic protein can induce the meiotic maturation of Xenopus laevis oocytes, a process that can also be triggered by progesterone or high concentrations of insulin. Cycloheximide and puromycin, well-known inhibitors of protein synthesis, block the maturation process induced by progesterone and insulin but do not affect the maturation caused by H-raslys12 protein microinjection. Theophylline, an inhibitor of cAMP phosphodiesterase that also affects oocyte protein synthesis, does cause a partial inhibition of ras protein-induced maturation. These findings indicate that ras protein acts on the oocyte maturation process at a point that is downstream of the protein synthesis requirement, a characteristic shared with the maturation promoting factor, an activity that appears in oocytes and mitotic cells at the onset of cell division.