eIF4E promotes nuclear export of cyclin D1 mRNAs via an element in the 3'UTR

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E is a critical modulator of cellular growth with functions in the nucleus and cytoplasm. In the cytoplasm, recognition of the 5' m(7)G cap moiety on all mRNAs is sufficient for their functional interaction with eIF4E. In contrast, we have shown that in the nucleus eIF4E associates and promotes the nuclear export of cyclin D1, but not GAPDH or actin mRNAs. We determined that the basis of this discriminatory interaction is an approximately 100-nt sequence in the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of cyclin D1 mRNA, we refer to as an eIF4E sensitivity element (4E-SE). We found that cyclin D1 mRNA is enriched at eIF4E nuclear bodies, suggesting these are functional sites for organization of specific ribonucleoproteins. The 4E-SE is required for eIF4E to efficiently transform cells, thereby linking recognition of this element to eIF4E mediated oncogenic transformation. Our studies demonstrate previously uncharacterized fundamental differences in eIF4E-mRNA recognition between the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments and further a novel level of regulation of cellular proliferation.     

Structure and functions of the translation initiation factor eIF4E and its role in cancer development and treatment

In eukaryotic cells, protein synthesis is a complex and multi-step process that has several mechanisms to start the translation including cap-dependent and cap-independent initiation. The translation control of eukaryotic gene expression occurs principally at the initiation step. In this context, it is critical that the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E bind to the 7-methylguanosine (m7G) cap present at the 5′-UTRs of most eukaryotic mRNAs. Combined with other initiation factors, eIF4E mediates the mRNA recruitment on ribosomes to start the translation. Moreover, the eIF4E nuclear bodies are involved in the export of specific mRNAs from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. In this review, we focus on the eIF4E structure and its physiological functions, and describe the role of eIF4E in cancer development and progression and the current therapeutic strategies to target eIF4E.     

Identification in the ancient protist Giardia lamblia of two eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E homologues with distinctive functions

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) binds to the m(7)GTP of capped mRNAs and is an essential component of the translational machinery that recruits the 40S small ribosomal subunit. We describe here the identification and characterization of two eIF4E homologues in an ancient protist, Giardia lamblia. Using m(7)GTP-Sepharose affinity column chromatography, a specific binding protein was isolated and identified as Giardia eIF4E2. The other homologue, Giardia eIF4E1, bound only to the m(2,2,7)GpppN structure. Although neither homologue can rescue the function of yeast eIF4E, a knockdown of eIF4E2 mRNA in Giardia by a virus-based antisense ribozyme decreased translation, which was shown to use m(7)GpppN-capped mRNA as a template. Thus, eIF4E2 is likely the cap-binding protein in a translation initiation complex. The same knockdown approach indicated that eIF4E1 is not required for translation in Giardia. Immunofluorescence assays showed wide distribution of both homologues in the cytoplasm. But eIF4E1 was also found concentrated and colocalized with the m(2,2,7)GpppN cap, 16S-like rRNA, and fibrillarin in the nucleolus-like structure in the nucleus. eIF4E1 depletion from Giardia did not affect mRNA splicing, but the protein was bound to Giardia small nuclear RNAs D and H known to have an m(2,2,7)GpppN cap, thus suggesting a novel function not yet observed among other eIF4Es in eukaryotes.     

Sumoylation of eIF4E activates mRNA translation

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) is the cap‐binding protein that binds the 5′ cap structure of cellular messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Despite the obligatory role of eIF4E in cap‐dependent mRNA translation, how the translation activity of eIF4E is controlled remains largely undefined. Here, we report that mammalian eIF4E is regulated by SUMO1 (small ubiquitin‐related modifier 1) conjugation. eIF4E sumoylation promotes the formation of the active eIF4F translation initiation complex and induces the translation of a subset of proteins that are essential for cell proliferation and preventing apoptosis. Furthermore, disruption of eIF4E sumoylation inhibits eIF4E‐dependent protein translation and abrogates the oncogenic and antiapoptotic functions associated with eIF4E. These data indicate that sumoylation is a new fundamental regulatory mechanism of protein synthesis. Our findings suggest further that eIF4E sumoylation might be important in promoting human cancers.     

Cap-free structure of eIF4E suggests a basis for conformational regulation by its ligands

The activity of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E is modulated through conformational response to its ligands. For example, eIF4G and eIF4E-binding proteins (4E-BPs) modulate cap affinity, and thus physiological activity of eIF4E, by binding a site distal to the 7-methylguanosine cap-binding site. Further, cap binding substantially modulates eIF4E's affinity for eIF4G and the 4E-BPs. To date, only cap-bound eIF4E structures were reported. In the absence of structural information on the apo form, the molecular underpinnings of this conformational response mechanism cannot be established. We report here the first cap-free eIF4E structure. Apo-eIF4E exhibits structural differences in the cap-binding site and dorsal surface relative to cap-eIF4E. Analysis of structure and dynamics of apo-eIF4E, and changes observed upon ligand binding, reveal a molecular basis for eIF4E's conformational response to these ligands. In particular, alterations in the S4-H4 loop, distal to either the cap or eIF4G binding sites, appear key to modulating these effects. Mutation in this loop mimics these effects. Overall, our studies have important implications for the regulation of eIF4E.     

High affinity RNA for mammalian initiation factor 4E interferes with mRNA-cap binding and inhibits translation

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) consists of three polypeptides (eIF4A, eIF4G, and eIF4E) and is responsible for recruiting ribosomes to mRNA. eIF4E recognizes the mRNA 5'-cap structure (m7GpppN) and plays a pivotal role in control of translation initiation, which is the rate-limiting step in translation. Overexpression of eIF4E has a dramatic effect on cell growth and leads to oncogenic transformation. Therefore, an inhibitory agent to eIF4E, if any, might serve as a novel therapeutic against malignancies that are caused by aberrant translational control. Along these lines, we developed two RNA aptamers, aptamer 1 and aptamer 2, with high affinity for mammalian eIF4E by in vitro RNA selection-amplification. Aptamer 1 inhibits the cap binding to eIF4E more efficiently than the cap analog m7GpppN or aptamer 2. Consistently, aptamer 1 inhibits specifically cap-dependent in vitro translation while it does not inhibit cap-independent HCV IRES-directed translation initiation. The interaction between eIF4E and eIF4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), however, was not inhibited by aptamer 1. Aptamer 1 is composed of 86 nucleotides, and the high affinity to eIF4E is affected by deletions at both termini. Moreover, relatively large areas in the aptamer 1 fold are protected by eIF4E as determined by ribonuclease footprinting. These findings indicate that aptamers can achieve high affinity to a specific target protein via global conformational recognition. The genetic mutation and affinity study of variant eIF4E proteins suggests that aptamer 1 binds to eIF4E adjacent to the entrance of the cap-binding slot and blocks the cap-binding pocket, thereby inhibiting translation initiation.     

The yeast nuclear cap binding complex can interact with translation factor eIF4G and mediate translation initiation

The mRNA cap structure is bound by either the nuclear (CBC) or the cytoplasmic (eIF4F) cap binding complex. Following mRNA export, CBC must be exchanged for eIF4F in the cytoplasm. It is not known how this exchange occurs or how this RNP remodeling event is integrated with mRNA function. Here we report genetic and biochemical evidence that the yeast translation initiation factor eIF4G associates with CBC, and that eIF4E, the eIF4F component that binds both the cap and eIF4G, antagonizes this interaction. Furthermore, we find that CBC can stimulate translation in extracts containing an eIF4G protein deficient for eIF4E binding. These data suggest that eIF4E binding to the eIF4G-CBC complex on newly exported mRNA displaces CBC, and that the first round of translation on mRNA may occur via a different mechanism than subsequent rounds.     

The antiviral drug ribavirin does not mimic the 7-methylguanosine moiety of the mRNA cap structure in vitro

The eukaryotic initiation factor eIF4E binds the mRNA 5' cap structure and has a central role during translational initiation. eIF4E and the mechanisms to control its activity have oncogenic properties and thus have become targets for anticancer drug development. A recent study (Kentsis et al. 2004) presented evidence that the antiviral nucleoside ribavirin and its phosphorylated derivatives were structural mimics of the mRNA cap, high-affinity ligands for eIF4E, and potent repressors of eIF4E-mediated cell transformation and tumor growth. Based on these findings, we tested ribavirin, ribavirin triphosphate (RTP), and the dinucleotide RpppG for their ability to inhibit translation in vitro. Surprisingly, the ribavirin-based compounds did not affect translation at concentrations where canonical cap analogs efficiently block cap-dependent translation. Using a set of reporter mRNAs that are translated via either cap-dependent or viral internal ribosome entry sites (IRES)-dependent initiation, we found that these ribavirin-containing compounds did inhibit translation at high (millimolar) concentrations, but there was no correlation of this inhibition with an eIF4E requirement for translation. The addition of a ribavirin-containing cap to mRNA did not stimulate translation. Fluorescence titration experiments with eIF4E and the nuclear cap-binding complex CBC indicated affinities for RTP and RpppG that were two to four orders of magnitude lower than those of m(7)GTP and m(7)GpppG. We conclude that, at least with respect to translation, ribavirin does not act in vitro as a functional mimic of the mRNA cap.     

Translation driven by an eIF4G core domain in vivo.

Most eukaryotic mRNAs possess a 5' cap structure (m(7)GpppN) and a 3' poly(A) tail which promote translation initiation by binding the eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF)4E and the poly(A) binding protein (PABP), respectively. eIF4G can bridge between eIF4E and PABP, and-through eIF3-is thought to establish a link to the small ribosomal subunit. We fused the C-terminal region of human eIF4GI lacking both the eIF4E- and PABP-binding sites, to the IRE binding protein IRP-1. This chimeric protein suffices to direct the translation of the downstream cistron of bicistronic mRNAs bearing IREs in their intercistronic space in vivo. This function is preserved even when translation via the 5' end is inhibited. Deletion analysis defined the conserved central domain (amino acids 642-1091) of eIF4G as an autonomous 'ribosome recruitment core' and implicated eIF4A as a critical binding partner. Our data reveal the sufficiency of the conserved eIF4G ribosome recruitment core to drive productive mRNA translation in living cells. The C-terminal third of eIF4G is dispensable, and may serve as a regulatory domain.     

eIF4B controls survival and proliferation and is regulated by proto-oncogenic signaling pathways

Messenger RNA translation, or protein synthesis, is a fundamental biological process affecting cell growth, survival and proliferation. Initiation is the rate limiting and hence the most regulated step of translation. In eukaryotes, translation initiation is facilitated by multiple protein factors collectively called eIFs (for eukaryotic translation initiation factors). The complex consisting of the eIF4 group factors including the mRNA cap-binding eIF4E protein, large scaffolding protein eIF4G and RNA helicase eIF4A is assisted by the eIF4B co-factor to unwind local secondary structures and create a ribosome landing pad on mRNA. Recruitment of the ribosome and augmentation in the mRNA scanning process culminates in the positioning of the ribosome over the start codon. Deregulated translational control is believed to play an important role in oncogenic transformation. Indeed, many eIFs are bona fide proto-oncogenes. In many types of human cancers, eIFs are either overexpressed or ectopically activated by Ras-MAPK and PI3K-mTOR signaling cascades, resulting in increased survival and accelerated proliferation. In this review we will analyze the bulk of data describing eIF4B and its role in cell survival and proliferation. Recent studies have shown that eIF4B is phosphorylated and activated by Ras-MAPK and PI3K-mTOR signaling cascades. In addition, eIF4B regulates translation of proliferative and pro-survival mRNAs. Moreover, eIF4B depletion in cancer cells attenuates proliferation, sensitizes them to genotoxic stress driven apoptosis. Taken together, these findings identify eIF4B as a potential target for development of anti-cancer therapies.     

A new translational regulator with homology to eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G.

Translation initiation in eukaryotes is facilitated by the cap structure, m7GpppN (where N is any nucleotide). Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) is a cap binding protein complex that consists of three subunits: eIF4A, eIF4E and eIF4G. eIF4G interacts directly with eIF4E and eIF4A. The binding site of eIF4E resides in the N-terminal third of eIF4G, while eIF4A and eIF3 binding sites are present in the C-terminal two-thirds. Here, we describe a new eukaryotic translational regulator (hereafter called p97) which exhibits 28% identity to the C-terminal two-thirds of eIF4G. p97 mRNA has no initiator AUG and translation starts exclusively at a GUG codon. The GUG-initiated open reading frame (907 amino acids) has no canonical eIF4E binding site. p97 binds to eIF4A and eIF3, but not to eIF4E. Transient transfection experiments show that p97 suppresses both cap-dependent and independent translation, while eIF4G supports both translation pathways. Furthermore, inducible expression of p97 reduces overall protein synthesis. These results suggest that p97 functions as a general repressor of translation by forming translationally inactive complexes that include eIF4A and eIF3, but exclude eIF4E.     

eIF4B controls survival and proliferation and is regulated by proto-oncogenic signaling pathways

Messenger RNA translation or protein synthesis, is a fundamental biological process affecting cell growth, survival and proliferation. Initiation is the rate limiting and hence the most regulated step of translation. In eukaryotes, translation initiation is facilitated by multiple protein factors collectively called eIFs (for eukaryotic translation initiation factors). The complex consisting of the eIF4 group factors including the mRNA cap-binding eIF4E protein, large scaffolding protein eIF4G and RNA helicase eIF4A is assisted by the eIF4B co-factor to unwind local secondary structures and create a ribosome landing pad on mRNA. Recruitment of the ribosome and augmentation in the mRNA scanning process culminates in the positioning of the ribosome over the start codon. Deregulated translational control is believed to play an important role in oncogenic transformation. Indeed, many eIFs are bona fide proto-oncogenes. In many types of human cancers, eIFs are either overexpressed or ectopically activated by Ras-MAPK and PI3K-mTOR signaling cascades, resulting in increased survival and accelerated proliferation. In this review we will analyze the bulk of data describing eIF4B and its role in cell survival and proliferation. Recent studies have shown that eIF4B is phosphorylated and activated by Ras-MAPK and PI3K-mTOR signaling cascades. In addition, eIF4B regulates translation of proliferative and pro-survival mRNAs. Moreover, eIF4B depletion in cancer cells attenuates proliferation, sensitizes them to genotoxic stress-driven apoptosis. Taken together, these findings identify eIF4B as a potential target for development of anti-cancer therapies.Key words: eIF4B, translation, signaling, structured 5′UTR, helicase activity, survival, proliferation, apoptosis     

Regulation of translation initiation by insulin and amino acids in skeletal muscle of neonatal pigs

Previous studies have shown that intravenous infusion of insulin and/or amino acids reproduces the feeding-induced stimulation of muscle protein synthesis in neonates and that insulin and amino acids act independently to produce this effect. The goal of the present study was to delineate the regulatory roles of insulin and amino acids on muscle protein synthesis in neonates by examining translational control mechanisms, specifically the eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIFs), which enable coupling of initiator methionyl-tRNAi and mRNA to the 40S ribosomal subunit. Insulin secretion was blocked by somatostatin in fasted 7-day-old pigs (n = 8-12/group), insulin was infused to achieve plasma levels of approximately 0, 2, 6, and 30 microU/ml, and amino acids were clamped at fasting or fed levels or, at the high insulin dose, below fasting. Both insulin and amino acids increased the phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K1) and the eIF4E-binding protein (4E-BP1), decreased the binding of 4E-BP1 to eIF4E, increased eIF4E binding to eIF4G, and increased fractional protein synthesis rates but did not affect eIF2B activity. In the absence of insulin, amino acids had no effect on these translation initiation factors but increased the protein synthesis rates. Raising insulin from below fasting to fasting levels generally did not alter translation initiation factor activity but raised protein synthesis rates. The phosphorylation of S6K1 and 4E-BP1 and the amount of 4E-BP1 bound to eIF4E and eIF4E bound to eIF4G were correlated with insulin level, amino acid level, and protein synthesis rate. Thus insulin and amino acids regulate muscle protein synthesis in skeletal muscle of neonates by modulating the availability of eIF4E for 48S ribosomal complex assembly, although other processes also must be involved.     

Phosphorylation states of translational initiation factors affect mRNA cap binding in wheat

Phosphorylation of eukaryotic translational initiation factors (eIFs) has been shown to be an important means of regulating protein synthesis. Plant initiation factors undergo phosphorylation/dephosphorylation under a variety of stress and growth conditions. We have shown that recombinant wheat cap-binding protein, eIF(iso)4E, produced from E. coli can be phosphorylated in vitro. Phosphorylation of eIF(iso)4E has effects on m(7)G cap-binding affinity similar to those of phosphorylation of mammalian eIF4E even though eIF(iso)4E lacks an amino acid that can be phosphorylated at the residue corresponding to Ser-209, the phosphorylation site in mammalian eIF4E. The cap-binding affinity was reduced 1.2-2.6-fold when eIF(iso)4E was phosphorylated. The in vitro phosphorylation site for wheat eIF(iso)4E was identified as Ser-207. Addition of eIF(iso)4G and eIF4B that had also been phosphorylated in vitro further reduced cap-binding affinity. Temperature-dependent studies showed that DeltaH(degrees) was favorable for cap binding regardless of the phosphorylation state of the initiation factors. The entropy, however, was unfavorable (negative) except when eIF(iso)4E was phosphorylated and interacting with eIF(iso)4G. Phosphorylation may modulate not only cap-binding activity, but other functions of eukaryotic initiation factors as well.     

A novel shuttling protein, 4E-T, mediates the nuclear import of the mRNA 5' cap-binding protein, eIF4E

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) plays an important role in the control of cell growth. eIF4E binds to the mRNA 5' cap structure m(7)GpppN (where N is any nucleotide), and promotes ribosome binding to the mRNA in the cytoplasm. However, a fraction of eIF4E localizes to the nucleus. Here we describe the cloning and functional characterization of a new eIF4E-binding protein, referred to as 4E-T (eIF4E-Transporter). We demonstrate that 4E-T is a nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein that contains an eIF4E-binding site, one bipartite nuclear localization signal and two leucine-rich nuclear export signals. eIF4E forms a complex with the importin alphabeta heterodimer only in the presence of 4E-T. Overexpression of wild-type 4E-T, but not of a mutant defective for eIF4E binding, causes the nuclear accumulation of HA-eIF4E in cells treated with leptomycin B. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the novel nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein 4E-T mediates the nuclear import of eIF4E via the importin alphabeta pathway by a piggy-back mechanism.     

The Hsp90 Inhibitor Geldanamycin Abrogates Colocalization of eIF4E and eIF4E-Transporter into Stress Granules and Association of eIF4E with eIF4G

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E plays a critical role in the control of translation initiation through binding to the mRNA 5′ cap structure. eIF4E is also a component of processing bodies and stress granules, which are two types of cytoplasmic RNA granule in which translationally inactivated mRNAs accumulate. We found that treatment with the Hsp90 inhibitor geldanamycin leads to a substantial reduction in the number of HeLa cells that contain processing bodies. In contrast, stress granules are not disrupted but seem to be only partially affected by the inhibition of Hsp90. However, it is striking that eIF4E as well as its binding partner eIF4E transporter (4E-T), which mediates the import of eIF4E into the nucleus, are obviously lost from stress granules. Furthermore, the amount of eIF4G that is associated with the cap via eIF4E is reduced by geldanamycin treatment. Thus, the chaperone activity of Hsp90 probably contributes to the correct localization of eIF4E and 4E-T to stress granules and also to the interaction between eIF4E and eIF4G, both of which may be needed for eIF4E to acquire the physiological functionality that underlies the mechanism of translation initiation.