One size fits all: a surgical technique for the correction of all types of prominent ears

Patient satisfaction after surgery to correct the prominent ear relates to the degree of retroposition of the ear. Angular breaks in the cartilage seen with other cartilage-transecting procedures (and even after conchal resections), which are noticed by patients, led to the development of this technique. It is an easy operative technique that may be modified to suit all prominent ears, including the constricted cup ear, and it does not leave any sharp, visible ridges in the region of the anti-helix or concha. The procedure combines and modifies a number of techniques that have been described previously, which allows more flexibility in the treatment of this deformity.     

Modifications in the surgical correction of trigonocephaly

A modified technique for the surgical correction of trigonocephaly is presented. The technical modifications are designed both to increase the stability of fixation of the supraorbital bar and lateral canthal advancements and to increase interorbital distance and anterior cranial fossa volume when utilized in those patients who exhibit the full expression of trigonocephaly, including midline ridging, bifrontal recession, hypotelorbitism, shortened anterior cranial fossa, deficient projection of lateral orbit, and bitemporal narrowing. It is a modification of the supraorbital bar remodeling/advancement procedure as originally described by Marchac with the introduction of a nasofrontal osteotomy and superior osteotomy bone graft and midline miniplate fixation of the supraorbital bar to the nasofrontal junction. Its use in 20 patients has been favorable.     

The inverted nipple: its grading and surgical correction

Inverted nipples have been treated by various methods by many authors, but the relationship between the grade of the deformity and the appropriate surgical procedure is not clearly described. One hundred seven inverted nipples in 60 patients were treated from 1993 to 1997. They were divided into three groups by the authors' system of grading. The grade was made by preoperative evaluation of severity of inversion and was confirmed by the surgical findings. In grade I, the nipple is easily pulled out manually and maintains its projection quite well. Grade I nipples are believed to have minimal fibrosis; thus, manual traction and a single, buried purse-string suture are enough for the correction. The majority of inverted nipples belong to grade II, i.e., the nipples can be pulled out but cannot maintain projection and tend to go back again. These nipples are thought to have moderate fibrosis beneath the nipple. Blunt dissections for surgical release were carried out until the inversion did not recur after releasing the traction. The lactiferous ducts could be identified and preserved, permitting proper release of fibrotic bands in the grade II group. The purse-string suture was used. In grade III, to which the least number of inverted-nipple cases belong, the nipple can hardly be pulled out manually. Severe fibrosis made it impossible to reach optimal release of the fibrotic band with the preservation of the ducts. The fibrotic bands are widely dissected, and the lactiferous ducts are cut, especially in the central portion. Two or three deepithelialized dermal flaps may be used to make up for soft-tissue deficiency; a purse-string suture is also used. This grading system will be useful for patient classification and analysis, systematic planning, and application of the proper surgical procedures.     

Postquadrantectomy breast deformities: classification and techniques of surgical correction

The deformity which is encountered following quadrantectomy (or similar procedures such as segmentectomy or partial mastectomy) and radiation therapy is difficult to evaluate objectively, and subjective assessment of the cosmetic outcome is extremely variable. In a group of 54 patients who underwent the procedure between 1979 and 1983, the types of cosmetic changes were evaluated and classified according to morphologic criteria. Four types of deformities and their related etiopathologic factors were identified. Type I is characterized by malposition and distortion of the nipple-areola complex and is mainly due to postoperative fibrosis and scar contracture. In type II deformity, localized tissue insufficiency is observed, which may be due to skin deficiency (type IIa), subcutaneous tissue deficiency (type IIb), or both (type IIab). Type III deformity is characterized by breast retraction and shrinkage and is mainly due to the effects of radiotherapy on residual breast parenchyma. In type IV deformity, severe radiation-induced damage to the skin, nipple-areola complex, and subcutaneous and glandular tissues is present. Surgical correction of each type of deformity is discussed, and examples are reported.