New microsurgical breast reconstruction using free paraumbilical perforator adiposal flaps

Pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps have generally been used for bilateral breast losses. The major disadvantages of this method are the total or partial loss of the rectus abdominis muscles and various resulting postoperative complications, such as abdominal bulging and lumbar pain. With the recent development of perforator flaps and supermicrosurgery with anastomosis of 0.5-mm caliber vessels, these serious complications can be overcome with a paraumbilical perforator adiposal flap, without sacrificing the rectus abdominis muscle. The breasts of a 57-year-old woman who had undergone a bilateral subcutaneous mastectomy, including silicone prostheses, were repaired simultaneously with this new method using free paraumbilical perforator adiposal flaps. This new method of breast augmentation with a vascularized adiposal flap and without any muscle component is minimally invasive; its advantages are the preservation of the rectus abdominis muscles and the short time elevation for the adiposal flap.     

Superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap for reconstruction of limb defects

The superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap differs from the established groin flap in that it is nourished by only a perforator of the superficial circumflex iliac system and has a short segment (3 to 4 cm in length) of this vascular system. Three cases in which free superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flaps were successfully transferred for coverage of soft-tissue defects in the limb are described in this article. The advantages of this flap are as follows: no need for deeper and longer dissection for the pedicle vessel, a shorter flap elevation time, possible thinning of the flap with primary defatting, the possibility of an adiposal flap with customized thickness for tissue augmentation, a concealed donor site, minimal donor-site morbidity, and the availability of a large cutaneous vein as a venous drainage system. The disadvantages are the need for dissection for a smaller perforator and an anastomosing technique for small-caliber vessels of less than 1.0 mm.     

Clinical applications of free soleus and peroneal perforator flaps

Clinical applications of two free lateral leg perforator flaps are described: a free soleus perforator flap that is based on the musculocutaneous perforator vessels from one of the three main arteries in the proximal lateral lower leg, and a free peroneal perforator flap that is based on the septocutaneous or direct skin perforator vessels from the peroneal artery in the distal and middle thirds of the lateral lower leg. The authors applied free soleus perforator flaps to 18 patients and free peroneal perforator flaps to five patients with soft-tissue defects. The recipient site was the great toe in 14 patients, the hand and fingers in five patients, the leg in two patients, and the upper arm and the jaw in one patient each. The largest soleus perforator flap was 15 x 9 cm, and the largest peroneal perforator flap was 9 x 4 cm. Vascular pedicle lengths ranged from 6.5 to 10 cm in soleus perforator flaps and from 4 to 6 cm in peroneal perforator flaps. All flaps, except for the flap in one patient in the peroneal perforator flap series, survived completely. Advantages of these flaps are that there is no need to sacrifice any main artery in the lower leg, and there is minimal morbidity at the donor site. For patients with a small to medium soft-tissue defect, these free perforator flaps are useful.     

Perforator flap breast reconstruction using internal mammary perforator branches as a recipient site: an anatomical and clinical analysis

A variety of useful recipient sites exist for breast reconstruction with free flaps, and correct selection remains a significant decision for the surgeon. Among the main pedicles, the disadvantages of the internal mammary vessels are the necessity of costal cartilage resection and the impairment of future cardiac bypass. This study was designed to reduce morbidity and to seek alternative recipient vessels. In the anatomical part of the study, 32 parasternal regions from 16 fresh cadavers were used. The locations and components of internal mammary perforator branches were measured and a histomorphometric analysis was performed. In the clinical part of the study, 36 patients underwent 38 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap and two superior gluteal artery perforator flap breast reconstructions (31 immediate and four bilateral). The recipient vessels were evaluated. In the anatomical study, there were 22 perforating vessels, with 14 (63.6 percent) on the second intercostal space and 11 (50 percent) with one artery and vein. The average (+/-SD) internal and external perforator artery diameters were 598.48 +/- 176.68 microm and 848.97 +/- 276.68 microm, respectively. In the clinical study, 13 successful anastomoses (32.5 percent) were performed at the internal mammary perforator branches (second and third intercostal spaces) with 12 DIEP flaps and one superior gluteal artery perforator flap (all performed as immediate reconstructions). One case of intraoperative vein thrombosis and one case of pedicle avulsion during flap molding were observed. The anatomic and clinical studies demonstrated that the internal mammary perforator branch as a recipient site is a further refinement to free flap breast reconstruction. However, it is neither a reproducible technique nor potentially applicable in all patients. Preoperative planning between the general surgeon and the plastic surgeon is crucial to preserve the main perforator branches during mastectomy. The procedure was not demonstrable in late reconstructions. The main advantages of internal mammary perforator branches used as recipient sites are sparing of the internal mammary vessels for a possible future cardiac surgery, prevention of thoracic deformities, and reduction of the operative time by limited dissection. Despite this, limited surgical exposure, caliber incompatibility, and technical difficulties have to be considered as the main restrictions.     

The thin latissimus dorsi perforator-based free flap for resurfacing

The authors present their experience with "thin" latissimus dorsi perforator-based free flaps for resurfacing defects. Perforator-based free flaps have been used for various kinds of reconstruction by presenting important donor structures. The thin latissimus dorsi perforatorbased free flap included only the skin and superficial adipose layer to reduce its bulkiness by dissection through the superficial fascial plane. This flap was used in 12 clinical cases, without flap necrosis or other serious postoperative complications. All of the patients were examined by preoperative power Doppler ultrasound in the spectral Doppler mode to search for the most reliable perforator. This noninvasive ultrasound technique determines the exact location and course of and ensures the reliable flow of the perforators; therefore, it greatly assists microsurgeons in saving operation time and in selecting the most suitable design for perforator flap reconstruction. We used perforators that were identified several centimeters from the lateral border of the latissimus dorsi muscle. The thin flap dimensions could be safely designed for flaps measuring up to 20 cm in length and 8 cm in width for primary closure of the donor site. Generally, a long pedicle is not required for resurfacing reconstructions, where small recipient arteries in the bed are acceptable for anastomosis with pedicles. However, pedicle dissection to the proximal vessels through the latissimus dorsi muscle was required when it was necessary to match the recipient vein for anastomosis. The authors conclude that this thin latissimus dorsi perforator-based free flap has great potential for resurfacing because of its constant thickness, easy elevation with the help of power Doppler ultrasound information, and proper flap size for moderate defects caused by scar contracture release, superficial tumor ablation, and so on.     

Monitoring flap for buried free tissue transfer: its importance and reliability

To improve the success rate of microsurgical flap transfers into a buried area, it is important to monitor the circulation of the flap during the early stage. A monitoring flap includes such advantages as simplicity, reliability, noninvasiveness, and the ability to continuously monitor the vascular status of various buried flaps. This article describes experiences related to the importance and reliability of a monitoring flap. A total of 109 flaps in 99 patients were treated with buried free flaps, including a monitoring flap, between 1990 and 1999. Forty-nine patients received a tubed free radial forearm flap with a skin-monitoring flap, and six received a free jejunal flap with a jejunal segment monitoring flap for the reconstruction of the esophagus. Vascularized fibular grafts with a skin monitoring flap or peroneus longus muscle monitoring flap were used for reconstructing the mandible in six patients and for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head in 48 flaps in 38 patients. Monitoring flap abnormalities were indicated in 14 flaps; therefore, immediate revisions were performed on the pedicle of the monitoring flap and microanastomosis site. Among these 14 flaps, nine showed true thrombosis and five showed false-positive thrombosis. Among the nine flaps that showed true thrombosis, five were salvaged and four were finally lost. The false-positive thrombosis in the five flaps was attributed to torsion or tension of the perforator of the monitoring flap in three flaps, an unclear determination in one flap because the monitoring flap size was too small, and damage to the perforator in the last flap. The total thrombosis rate was 8.3 percent (nine of 109), and the failure rate of the free tissue transfer was 3.7 percent (four of 109). The overall sensitivity of the monitoring flap was 100 percent, the predictive value of a positive test was 64 percent (nine of 14), and false-positive results occurred in 36 percent (five of 14). The salvage rate was 55.6 percent. To improve the reliability of a monitoring flap, it is recommended that the size of the flap be larger than 1 x 2 cm to assess the arterial status, and that a perforator with the appropriate caliber be selected. When a monitoring flap is fixed to a previous incision line or a newly created wound, any torsion or tension of the perforator should be avoided. In conclusion, the current results suggest that a monitoring flap is a simple, extremely useful, and reliable method for assessing the vascular status of a buried free flap.     

Two options for perforator flaps in the flank donor site: latissimus dorsi and thoracodorsal perforator flaps

Two types of perforators, septocutaneous and musculocutaneous, are found in the same donor site of the flank area, and two perforator flaps based on each perforator are clinically available. Therefore, it is necessary to distinguish them from one another using different nomenclatures. Accordingly, the perforator flap based on a musculocutaneous perforator is named according to the name of the muscle perforated, the latissimus dorsi perforator flap, and the perforator flap based on a septocutaneous perforator, located between the serratus anterior and latissimus dorsi muscles, is named according to the name of the proximal vessel, the thoracodorsal perforator flap. In this series of 42 latissimus dorsi perforator flaps, flap size ranged from 5 x 3 cm to 20 x 15 cm, and two complications were observed: a marginal necrosis in an extremely large flap (26 x 12 cm) and a failure caused by infection. The thoracodorsal perforator flap was used in 14 cases, including two cases of chimeric composition. Flap size ranged from 4.5 x 3.5 to 18 x 15 cm, with no complications. In the two patterns of perforator flap that the author used, initial temporary flap congestion was observed in five latissimus dorsi perforator flap cases and two thoracodorsal perforator flap cases, when the flap was designed as a large flap or a less reliable perforator was selected. However, the congestion was not serious enough to cause flap necrosis. Several techniques, such as T anastomosis or inclusion of an additional perforator or a small portion of muscle, are recommended to prevent the initial flap congestion, especially when an unreliable perforator is inevitably used or when a flap larger than 20 cm long is required. A small portion of the muscle was included in six cases, when an unduly large or improperly long flap was planned. All of the flaps were successful and ranged from 22 x 7 to 15 x 28 cm, except for one case of distal flap necrosis in an extraordinarily large flap measuring 34 x 10 cm. Diverse selection of the perforator flap is one of the great advantages of the flank donor site, providing it with wider availability and more versatile composition for reconstruction or resurfacing.     

The value of preoperative Doppler sonography for planning free perforator flaps

The individual perforating vessels have a high degree of anatomical variation, therefore it is desirable to conduct a careful examination of them before undertaking a perforator flap operation. Because locating the vessels beforehand makes performing the operative procedure much easier, the aim of the present study was to assess the value of using simple acoustic Doppler sonography to plan a perforator flap operation. The vessel examinations were carried out before taking 46 free microvascular flaps from either the lower abdominal wall or the buttock for reconstructive breast surgery. The perforating vessels located were marked, and their position relative to the umbilicus or the most cranial point of the rima ani recorded using a coordinate system. In 40 patients, a perforator flap operation (deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, n = 32; superior gluteal artery perforator flap, n = 8) was actually carried out; in six of these patients, a myocutaneous flap was used because of the insufficient availability of perforating vessels. Before the operation, perforating vessels were marked for each patient, with an average of 7.3 for the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and 6.5 for the superior gluteal artery perforator flap. Out of 286 vessels marked for later perforator flaps, 162 were identified during the operation. A preoperatively marked vessel was used in 37 of 40 patients. In the remaining patients, a vessel was used that had not been previously marked. The vertical and horizontal distance between the perforating vessels identified during the operation and the preoperative marks averaged 0.8 cm. The results show preoperative Doppler sonography to be useful for locating the position of individual perforating vessels, making it much easier to find them during the operation.     

Free dorsoulnar perforator flap transfers for the reconstruction of severely injured digits

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of transferring the free dorsoulnar perforator flap nourished by the cutaneous perforator branched dorsoulnar artery to reconstruct severely injured fingers under upper arm anesthesia. Between April of 2001 and April of 2002, 13 free dorsoulnar perforator flaps were used in 13 patients. There were 11 men and two women ranging in age from 18 to 64 years, with an average age of 38 years. The affected fingers were one thumb, four index fingers, five middle fingers, two ring fingers, and one little finger. All cases were performed under upper arm anesthesia combined with intravenous local anesthesia. The operative time ranged from 103 to 140 minutes, with an average time of 120 minutes. The flap size ranged from 1 x 3 to 3 x 4 cm, and was transferred from the same forearm of the injured finger. All donor sites were closed primarily without a skin graft. The aim of reconstruction for fingers was to repair a traumatic defect (five cases), partial necrosis following replantation (two cases), and soft-tissue defects resulting from resection of a scar (three cases) and to revascularize ischemic fingers (three cases). All flaps survived completely. After repair of the flow-through circulation of the common digital artery and ischemic finger, a postoperative angiogram showed the vascular patency and hypervascularity of the reconstructed fingers, and the patients' complaints were reduced. The free dorsoulnar perforator flap under regional anesthesia is first reported; it may become one valuable option as a very small flap for the treatment of repairing intercalated or segmental defects as a flow-through flap for soft-tissue defects and ischemic fingers.     

Technique and strategy in anterolateral thigh perforator flap surgery,based on an analysis of 15 complete and partial failures in 439 cases

The free anterolateral thigh flap is becoming one of the most preferred options for soft-tissue defect reconstruction. Between June of 1996 and August of 2000, 672 anterolateral thigh flaps were used in 660 patients in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. A total of 439 flaps were cutaneous or fasciocutaneous flaps based on musculocutaneous perforators. The analysis of the flap failures was done only in this perforator series. In six cases, no suitable skin vessel was found during the dissection of the flaps. The complete success rate was 96.58 percent (424 of 439). Of the 15 failure cases, eight were complete and seven were partial (10 percent to 60 percent of the flap). Thirty-four flaps were reexplored, and 19 (56 percent) were salvaged. In this study, some of the reasons for the flap failure, unique to the anterolateral thigh perforator flap, were identified. They include inadvertent division of perforator at the fascial plane as a result of inadequate knowledge of perforator anatomy, inadvertent injury to the perforator during intramuscular dissection (noted by the surgeon or ignored) as a result of inexperience, and twisting of the pedicle during inset of the flap at the recipient site. Technical pearls in the harvest of the anterolateral thigh perforator flap are as follows: mapping of the skin vessels with a Doppler probe before flap design, meticulous dissection of the perforator under surgical loupe or even lower-magnification microscope, inclusion of a small fascia cuff around the perforator, and intermittent topical use of Xylocaine during the intramuscular dissection of the perforators. During reexploration, one must search for twisting of the pedicle and small bleeders from the branches of the intramuscular perforators.     

Importance of lateral row perforator vessels in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap harvesting

Free flaps based on perforator vessels, and in particular the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, are currently being applied in abdominal reconstruction. However, one of the main disadvantages is the operative complexity. Through anatomical study and clinical experience with the DIEP flap in breast reconstruction, the intramuscular path of the perforator vessels was comparatively studied, to establish the main anatomical parameters that favor procedure planning. Thirty DIEP flaps from 15 fresh cadavers were used. The number, location, and intramuscular course of the perforator vessels were determined. In addition, an initial clinical study was performed in 31 patients using 35 DIEP flaps in breast reconstruction. The number, location, and the intramuscular course of the perforators were assessed. In the cadaver study, 191 perforator vessels were detected (6.4 vessels per flap). Thirty-four percent were located in the lateral row, and the rectilinear course was observed in 79.2 percent of these vessels. In the medial row, only 18.2 percent of the perforator vessels presented this configuration (p = 0.001). Thirty-one patients underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction, with 26 immediate and four bilateral reconstructions. In 22 of 35 flaps (62.9 percent), two perforators were used. In 25 flaps (71.4 percent), the lateral row perforators with a rectilinear course were observed. Mean operative time was 7 hours and 37 minutes. Two total flap losses and two partial necroses were observed. The majority of the lateral row perforators presented a rectilinear intramuscular course, which was shorter than that of the medial row perforators. This anatomical characteristic favors dissection with reduced operative time and vascular lesion morbidity, resulting in an important anatomical parameter for DIEP flap harvesting.     

The thoracodorsal artery perforator flap: clinical experience and anatomic study with emphasis on harvest techniques

The thoracodorsal artery perforator flap is a relatively new flap that has yet to find its niche in reconstructive surgery. At the authors' institution it has been used for limb salvage, head and neck reconstruction, and trunk reconstruction in cases related to trauma, burns, and malignancy. The authors have found the flap to be advantageous for cranial base reconstruction and for resurfacing the face and oral cavity. The flap has been used successfully for reconstruction of traumatic upper and lower extremity defects, and it can be used as a pedicled flap or as a free tissue transfer. The perforating branches of the thoracodorsal artery offer a robust blood supply to a skin-soft-tissue paddle of 10 to 12 cm x 25 cm, overlying the latissimus dorsi muscle. The average pedicle length is 20 cm (range, 16 to 23 cm), which allows for a safe anastomosis outside the zone of injury in traumatized extremities; the flap can be made sensate by neurorrhaphy with sensory branches of the intercostal nerves. Vascularized bone can be transferred with this flap by taking advantage of the inherent vascular anatomy of the subscapular artery. A total of 30 pedicled and free flap transfers were performed at the authors' institution with an overall complication rate of 23 percent and an overall flap survival rate of 97 percent. Major complications, such as vascular thrombosis, return to the operating room, fistula formation, recurrence of tumor, and flap loss, occurred in 17 percent of the patients. Despite these drawbacks, the authors have found the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap to be a safe and extremely versatile flap that offers significant advantages in acute and delayed reconstruction cases.     

Perforator-based flap in rats: a new experimental model.

A new type of flap, the perforator-based flap, has been described in the last decade. It has been used successfully as a pedicle or free flap by many plastic surgeons. There is no animal model for research, although these flaps have gained popularity in clinical use. We created a perforator-based flap model in the rat (a perforator-based flap group and two control groups; 10 rats in each group) and evaluated the survival characteristics of the new flap. The abdominal skin flap was elevated based on the second perforator of the right superior deep epigastric artery and then sutured to its original bed. In the first control group, the same flap was elevated with a subcutaneous pedicle without any perforator; in the second control group, a right-sided, random-pattern pedicle abdominal skin flap with the same dimensions and location was elevated and sutured to its original bed. Flap survival was studied, and microangiography and histologic studies were performed. The amount of viable skin in the three groups was compared 1 week later. The area of surviving skin paddles in the experimental group ranged from 74 to 83 percent; in the first control group, it was 0 percent; and in the second control group, it ranged from 29 to 44 percent (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). There was a predictable and constant area of necrosis in the model.The results of this study demonstrate that most of the abdominal skin of the rat can survive on the basis of a single musculocutaneous perforator vessel. This flap can be easily elevated, and it can be used as a reliable model for flap research.     

Eyelids and eye socket reconstruction using the expanded forehead flap and scapha composite grafting.

After trauma or excision of malignant tumor, it is difficult to achieve satisfactory results when reconstructing deformed eyelids and the socket for an ocular prosthesis. The authors demonstrate examples of successful reconstruction for a prosthetic eye that provided adequate and aesthetic soft-tissue support achieved by applying a three-step surgical procedure of reconstruction of the eye socket, the eyelids, and the tarsus and eyelid margin. Because it is highly vascularized and its distal end can be divided into two or three portions for easy three-dimensional reconstruction, the expanded forehead flap alone, with a galea flap, or with a free rectus abdominis muscle perforator flap was used. The expanded forehead flap also provides excellent thin upper lid contour and good color-matching with a recipient site. For the eye socket, sufficient volume of tissue was provided from the expanded forehead flap with or without a galea or a free rectus abdominis muscle perforator flap, and a deep and convex fornix was formed. This resulted in a good fit and in stability of the ocular prosthesis. The surface and the inner lining of the eyelids were reconstructed using portions of the expanded forehead flap. For the tarsus and eyelid margin, conventional reconstruction techniques use cartilage of the concha, which has limitations of length and which does not fit the shape of the tarsal margin. The authors used the scapha composite graft, and a natural shape and good elasticity resulted.     

Perforator topography of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in 100 cases of breast reconstruction

The anatomic topography of the perforators within the rectus muscle and the anterior fascia largely determines the time needed to harvest the perforator free flap and the difficulty of the procedure. In 100 consecutive cases, the topographic patterns of the perforators were investigated. In 65 percent, a short intramuscular course was seen. In 16 percent, a perforator at the tendinous intersection was encountered. In 9 percent, the largest perforator was found to have a long intramuscular course. In 5 percent, a subfascial course was found, and in another 5 percent, a paramedian course was found. In 74 percent of flaps, just one perforator was used, whereas two perforators were dissected in 20 percent. Only in 6 percent of flaps were three perforators used. A long intramuscular course (>4 cm) lengthens the dissection substantially, especially when the intramuscular course is in a step-wise pattern. The subfascial course requires precarious attention at the early stage of the perforator dissection when splitting the fascia. The perforators at the tendinous intersections are the most accessible and require a short but intense dissection in the fibrotic tissue of intersection. A paramedian perforator, medial to the rectus muscle, is a septocutaneous rather than a musculocutaneous perforator. The straightforward dissection almost extends up to the midline. Therefore, dissection always is performed at one side and, if no good perforators are present, continued at the intact contralateral side. The size of these perforators and their location in the flap determine the choice. One perforator with significant flow can perfuse the whole flap. If in doubt, two perforators can be harvested, especially if they show a linear anatomy so that muscle fibers can be split. The only interference with the muscle exists in splitting the muscle fibers. A perforator that lies in the middle of the flap is preferable. For a large flap, a perforator of the medial row provides better perfusion to zone 4 than one of the lateral row because of the extra choke vessel for the lateral row perforators. The clinical appearance of the perforators is the key element in the dissection of the perforator flap. Perforator topography determines the overall length and difficulty of the procedure.     

Free medial plantar perforator flaps for the resurfacing of finger and foot defects

In this article, three cases in which free medial plantar perforator flaps were successfully transferred for coverage of soft-tissue defects in the fingers and foot are described. This perforator flap has no fascial component and is nourished only by perforators of the medial plantar vessel and a cutaneous vein or with a small segment of the medial plantar vessel. The advantages of this flap are minimal donor-site morbidity, minimal damage to both the posterior tibial and medial plantar systems, no need for deep dissection, the ability to thin the flap by primary removal of excess fatty tissue, the use of a large cutaneous vein as a venous drainage system, a good color and texture match for finger pulp repair, short time for flap elevation, possible application as a flow-through flap, and a concealed donor scar.     

A microdissected thin tensor fasciae latae perforator flap.

A new method, named "microdissection," has been introduced to create a thin flap by elevating the tensor fasciae latae perforator flap to serve as microdissected thin tensor fasciae latae perforator flap. In microdissection, perforators that run in the posterolateral direction in the adipose tissue after penetrating the deep fascia are dissected meticulously using an operative microscope, and a thin flap is elevated in a single process. The caliber of the perforator artery and vein in the tensor fasciae latae muscle measures approximately 0.7 mm and 0.9 mm, respectively. When transplanting the flap, an end-to-side anastomosis to the main artery measuring 1 to 2 mm is preferable to avoid the risk of arterial thrombosis. In contrast, an end-to-end anastomosis of the perforator vein to the comitans vein of the main artery can be performed safely. In the present study, 11 flaps were transplanted to the sites of skin defects of the neck, hand, axilla, knee, and foot. The author considers that the first clinical indication of this flap is reconstruction of hand skin defects.     

Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps

Breast reconstruction using the lower abdominal free superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap has the potential to virtually eliminate abdominal donor-site morbidity because the rectus abdominis fascia and muscle are not incised or excised. However, despite its advantages, the free SIEA flap for breast reconstruction is rarely used. A prospective study was conducted of the reliability and outcomes of the use of SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction compared with transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Breast reconstruction with an SIEA flap was attempted in 47 consecutive free autologous tissue breast reconstructions between August of 2001 and November of 2002. The average patient age was 49 years, and the average body mass index was 27 kg/m. The SIEA flap was used in 14 (30 percent) of these breast reconstructions in 12 patients. An SIEA flap was not used in the remaining 33 cases because the SIEA was absent or was deemed too small. The mean superficial inferior epigastric vessel pedicle length was approximately 7 cm. The internal mammary vessels were used as recipients in all SIEA flap cases so that the flap could be positioned sufficiently medially on the chest wall. The average hospital stay was significantly shorter for patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with SIEA flaps than it was for those who underwent reconstruction with TRAM or DIEP flaps. Of the 47 free flaps, one SIEA flap was lost because of arterial thrombosis. Medium-size and large breasts were reconstructed with hemi-lower abdominal SIEA flaps, with aesthetic results similar to those obtained with TRAM and DIEP flaps. The free SIEA flap is an attractive option for autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Harvest of this flap does not injure the anterior rectus fascia or underlying rectus abdominis muscle. This can potentially eliminate abdominal donor-site complications such as bulge and hernia formation, and decrease weakness, discomfort, and hospital stay compared with TRAM and DIEP flaps. The disadvantages of an SIEA flap are a smaller pedicle diameter and shorter pedicle length than TRAM and DIEP flaps and the absence or inadequacy of an arterial pedicle in most patients. Nevertheless, in selected patients, the SIEA flap offers advantages over the TRAM and DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.     

Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps

A series of 310 breasts reconstructed by a single surgeon using free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps was reviewed to see if there were any differences in the incidence of fat necrosis and/or partial flap loss between the two techniques. During the study period, 279 breasts were reconstructed with free TRAM flaps and 31 breasts were reconstructed with DIEP flaps. In the breasts reconstructed with free TRAM flaps, the incidence of partial flap loss was 2.2 percent and the incidence of fat necrosis was 12.9 percent. The DIEP flaps were divided into two groups. For the first eight flaps, patients were selected using the same criteria normally used to choose patients for free TRAM flaps. In this unselected early group, the incidence of partial flap loss was 37.5 percent and the incidence of fat necrosis was 62.5 percent. Because of the high incidence of partial flap loss and fat necrosis in the first eight flaps, subsequent selection was modified to limit the use of DIEP flaps to patients who had at least one sufficiently large perforator in each flap (a palpable pulse and a vein at least 1 mm in diameter) and who did not require more than 70 percent of the flap to create a breast of adequate size. In this later (selected) group, fat necrosis (17.4 percent) and partial flap loss (8.7 percent) were reduced to a level only moderately higher than that found in the free TRAM flap group. From these data, it can be concluded that the incidence of partial flap loss and fat necrosis is higher in DIEP flaps than in free TRAM flaps, probably because the blood flow to the former flap is less robust. This difficulty can be circumvented to some extent, however, by careful patient selection. Factors that should be considered include tobacco use, size of the perforators (especially the vein), and (in unilateral reconstructions) the amount of flap tissue across the midline needed to create an adequately sized breast. If these factors are properly considered when planning the operation, fat necrosis and partial flap loss can be reduced to an acceptable level. For selected patients, the DIEP flap is an excellent technique that can obtain a successful, autologous tissue breast reconstruction with minimal donor-site morbidity. For patients who are not good candidates for reconstruction with this flap, the free TRAM flap remains a good alternative.     

Simple approach to harvest of the anterolateral thigh flap

The free anterolateral thigh flap has proven to be invaluable for many types of reconstruction, ranging from upper and lower extremity trauma to head and neck reconstruction. There exist some controversies relating to certain difficulties in flap harvest because of the intramuscular route of its major perforator, which can exceed 80 percent and create a longer, more tedious dissection. Strategies to expedite flap harvest and minimize technical challenges have been proposed. The authors propose a simplified approach to harvest the anterolateral thigh flap founded on topographic surface anatomy and the intrinsic vascular anatomy of the flap. No Doppler imaging or angiography is used for preoperative perforator mapping.