Two pathways for lysophosphatidic acid production

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA, 1- or 2-acyl-sn-glycerol 3-phosphate) is a simple phospholipid but displays an intriguing cell biology that is mediated via interactions with G protein-coupled seven transmembrane receptors (GPCRs). So far, five GPCRs, designated LPA(1-5), and, more recently, two additional GPCRs, GPR87 and P2Y5, have been identified as receptors for LPA. These LPA receptors can be classified into two families, the EDG and P2Y families, depending on their primary structures. Recent studies on gene targeting mice and family diseases of these receptors revealed that LPA is involved in both pathological and physiological states including brain development (LPA(1)), neuropathy pain (LPA(1)), lung fibrosis (LPA(1)), renal fibrosis (LPA(1)) protection against radiation-induced intestinal injury (LPA(2)), implantation (LPA(3)) and hair growth (P2Y5). LPA is produced both in cells and biological fluids, where multiple synthetic reactions occur. There are at least two pathways for LPA production. In serum or plasma, LPA is predominantly produced by a plasma enzyme called autotaxin (ATX). ATX is a multifunctional ectoenzyme and is involved in many patho-physiological conditions such as cancer, neuropathy pain, lymphocyte tracking in lymph nodes, obesity, diabetes and embryonic blood vessel formation. LPA is also produced from phosphatidic acid (PA) by its deacylation catalyzed by phospholipase A (PLA)-type enzymes. However, the physiological roles of this pathway as well as the enzymes involved remained to be solved. A number of phospholipase A(1) and A(2) isozymes could be involved in this pathway. One PA-selective PLA(1) called mPA-PLA(1)alpha/LIPH is specifically expressed in hair follicles, where it has a critical role in hair growth by producing LPA through a novel LPA receptor called P2Y5.     

G protein mediated signaling pathways in lysophospholipid induced cell proliferation and survival

Agonist activation of a subset of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) stimulates cell proliferation, mimicking the better known effects of tyrosine kinase growth factors. Cell survival or apoptosis is also regulated via pathways initiated by stimulation of these same GPCRs. This review focuses on aspects of signaling by the lysophospholipid mediators, lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), and sphingosine 1 phosphate (S1P), which make these agonists uniquely capable of modulating cell growth and survival. The general features of GPCR coupling to specific G proteins, downstream effectors and signaling cascades are first reviewed. GPCR coupling to G(i) and Ras/MAPK or to G(q) and phospholipase generated second messengers are insufficient to regulate cell proliferation while G(12/13)/Rho engagement provides additional complementary signals required for cell proliferation. Survival is best predicted by coupling to G(i) pathways that regulate PI3K and Akt, but other signals generated through different G protein pathways are also implicated. The unique ability of LPA and S1P to concomitantly stimulate G(i), G(q), and G(12/13) pathways, given the proper complement of expressed LPA or S1P receptors, allows these receptors to support cell survival and proliferation. In pathophysiological situations, e.g., vascular disease, cancer, brain injury, and inflammation, components of the signaling cascade downstream of lysophospholipid receptors, in particular those involving Ras or Rho, may be altered. In addition, up or downregulation of LPA or S1P receptor subtypes, altering their ratio, and increased availability of the lysophospholipid ligands at sites of injury or inflammation, likely contribute to disease and may be important targets for therapeutic intervention.     

Cutting edge: selective usage of chemokine receptors by plasmacytoid dendritic cells

The existence of dendritic cell (DC) subsets is firmly established, but their trafficking properties are virtually unknown. In this study, we show that myeloid (M-DCs) and plasmacytoid (P-DCs) DCs isolated from human blood differ widely in the capacity to migrate to chemotactic stimuli. The pattern of chemokine receptors expressed by blood M-DCs and P-DCs, with the exception of CCR7, is similar. However, most chemokine receptors of P-DCs, in particular those specific for inflammatory chemokines and classical chemotactic agonists, are not functional in circulating cells. Following maturation induced by CD40 ligation, the receptors for inflammatory chemokines are down-regulated, and CCR7 on P-DCs becomes coupled to migration. The drastically impaired capacity of blood P-DCs to migrate in response to inflammatory chemotactic signals contrasts with the response to lymph node-homing chemokines, indicating a propensity to migrate to secondary lymphoid organs rather than to sites of inflammation.     

Expression of IFN-gamma induced CXCR3 agonist chemokines and compartmentalization of CXCR3+ cells in the periphery and lymph nodes of rhesus macaques during simian immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

Dysregulation of cytokines and chemokines during human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection is thought to be critical in the progression of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). To evaluate the potential role of Th1-agonist chemokines in disease progression during AIDS, we assessed CXCL9/MIG and CXCL10/IP-10 expression simultaneously in the periphery and lymphoid tissues of SIV-infected animals at a single-cell level by flow cytometry. We optimized intracellular staining and analysis of CXCL9/MIG and CXCL10/IP-10 production in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR+ macaque cells by flow cytometry using cross-reactive antibodies against human chemokines. We observed an upregulation of CXCL9/MIG and CXCL10/IP-10 production in both the periphery and lymph nodes of infected animals compared with na?ve controls. Animals with higher viral loads had higher levels of CXCL9/MIG and CXCL10/IP-10 producing cells compared with animals with low viral loads. Analysis of cells bearing the receptor (CXCR3) for CXCL9/MIG and CXCL10/IP-10 revealed increased number of CXCR3+ cells in the lymph nodes of infected animals. Importantly, an inverse correlation (P < 0.05) between CXCL9/MIG and CXCL10/IP-10 production, both in the periphery and lymph nodes, and peripheral CD4+ T-cell numbers was observed. These findings provide further evidence that dysregulation of Th1 agonist chemokines might contribute to the ultimate immunopathology during AIDS.     

Chemokine triggered integrin activation and actin remodeling events guiding lymphocyte migration across vascular barriers

Chemokine signals activate leukocyte integrins and actin remodeling machineries critical for leukocyte adhesion and motility across vascular barriers. The arrest of leukocytes at target blood vessel sites depends on rapid conformational activation of their α4 and β2 integrins by the binding of endothelial-displayed chemokines to leukocyte Gi-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). A universal regulator of this event is the integrin-actin adaptor, talin1. Chemokine-stimulated GPCRs can transmit within fractions of seconds signals via multiple Rho GTPases, which locally raise plasma membrane levels of the talin activating phosphatidyl inositol, PtdIns(4,5)P2 (PIP2). Additional pools of GPCR stimulated Rac-1 and Rap-1 GTPases together with GPCR stimulated PLC and PI3K family members regulate the turnover of focal contacts of leukocyte integrins, induce the collapse of leukocyte microvilli, and promote polarized leukocyte crawling in search of exit cues. Concomitantly, other leukocyte GTPases trigger invasive protrusions into and between endothelial cells in search of basolateral chemokine exit cues. We will review here major findings and open questions related to these sequential guiding activities of endothelial presented chemokines, focusing mainly on lymphocyte-endothelial interactions as a paradigm for other leukocytes.     

Differential induction of adhesion molecule and chemokine expression by LTalpha3 and LTalphabeta in inflammation elucidates potential mechanisms of mesenteric and peripheral lymph node development

Lymphotoxin (LT) is a member of the proinflammatory TNF family of cytokines that plays a critical role in the development of lymphoid tissue. It has previously been reported that the presence of the LTalpha transgene under the control of the rat insulin promoter results in inflammation at the sites of transgene expression. LTalpha transgene expression results in expression of the adhesion molecules VCAM, ICAM, peripheral node addressin (a marker of peripheral lymph nodes), and mucosal addressin cellular adhesion molecule (a marker of mucosal lymphoid tissue, including mesenteric lymph nodes). In this study to determine the mechanisms by which LT promotes inflammation and lymphoid tissue organization, we analyzed the regulation of expression of adhesion molecules and chemokines in LT transgenic mice. The results demonstrate that LTalpha3 induces expression of the adhesion molecules VCAM, ICAM, and mucosal addressin cellular adhesion molecule as well as the chemokines RANTES, IFN-inducible protein-10, and monocyte chemotactic protein-1, while LTalphabeta is required for the induction of peripheral node addressin that may contribute to the recruitment of L-selectinhigh CD44low naive T cells. These data provide candidate mediators of LT-induced inflammation as well as potential mechanisms by which LTalpha and LTalphabeta may differentially promote the development of mesenteric and peripheral lymph nodes.     

Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of second-generation phosphatidic acid derivatives as lysophosphatidic acid receptor ligands

Short-chain phosphatidic acid derivatives, dioctanoyl glycerol pyrophosphate (DGPP 8:0, 1) and phosphatidic acid 8:0 (PA 8:0, 2), were previously identified as subtype-selective LPA(1) and LPA(3) receptor antagonists. Recently, we reported that the replacement of the phosphate headgroup by thiophosphate in a series of fatty alcohol phosphates (FAP) improves agonist as well as antagonist activities at LPA GPCR. Here, we report the synthesis of stereoisomers of PA 8:0 analogs and their biological evaluation at LPA GPCR, PPARgamma, and ATX. The results indicate that LPA receptors stereoselectively interact with glycerol backbone modified ligands. We observed entirely stereospecific responses by dioctyl PA 8:0 compounds, in which (R)-isomers were found to be agonists and (S)-isomers were antagonists of LPA GPCR. From this series, we identified compound 13b as the most potent LPA(3) receptor subtype-selective agonist (EC(50)=3 nM), and 8b as a potent and selective LPA(3) receptor antagonist (K(i)=5 nM) and inhibitor of ATX (IC(50)=600 nM). Serinediamide phosphate 19b was identified as an LPA(3) receptor specific antagonist with no effect on LPA(1), LPA(2), and PPARgamma.     

Effect of moderate exercise on rat T-cells.

The aim of this study was a detailed examination of the effects of moderate exercise on T-cells in adult male Wistar rats. The T-cell populations were compared in sedentary rats (C, n = 5) and in rats trained for 4 weeks on a treadmill (30-60 min.day-1, 6 days.week-1, 20-30 m.min-1) and sacrificed at rest (T-rest, n = 5). In the T-rest rats, there were higher percentages of CD4+CD8-, CD4-CD8+ and CD4-CD8- thymocytes (P < 0.05, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 respectively) and of CD4-CD8+ splenocytes (P < 0.01), and a lower percentage of CD4-CD8+ cells in the lymph nodes (P < 0.01). Compared with T-rest or C rats, trained rats (n = 5) or untrained rats (n = 5) sacrificed immediately after a running session (60 min, 30 m.min-1) had a higher percentage of mononucleated cells CD4+CD8- in the blood (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01). Lastly, compared with C rats, rats (n = 5) sacrificed immediately after their 5th day of training (30-60 min.day-1) presented a higher total splenocyte population (P < 0.05) and greater in vitro production of T-cell growth factor (interleukin 2 + Interleukin 4) by splenocytes in response to a mitogen (P < 0.01). These results would indicate that moderate endurance training modifies the cellular composition of lymphoid organs, without impairing the in vitro functions of T-cells.     

Effect of posttranslational processing on the in vitro and in vivo activity of chemokines

The CXC and CC chemokine gene clusters provide an abundant number of chemotactic factors selectively binding to shared G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). Hence, chemokines function in a complex network to mediate migration of the various leukocyte subsets, expressing specific GPCRs during the immune response. Further fine-tuning of the chemokine system is reached through specific posttranslational modifications of the mature proteins. Indeed, enzymatic processing of chemokines during an early phase of inflammation leads to activation of precursor molecules or cleavage into even more active or receptor specific chemokine isoforms. At a further stage, proteolytic processing leads to loss of GPCR signaling, thereby providing natural chemokine receptor antagonists. Finally, further NH₂-terminal cleavage results in complete inactivation to dampen the inflammatory response. During inflammatory responses, the two chemokines which exist in a membrane-bound form may be released by proteases from the cellular surface. In addition to proteolytic processing, citrullination and glycosylation of chemokines is also important for their biological activity. In particular, citrullination of arginine residues seems to reduce the inflammatory activity of chemokines in vivo. This goes along with other positive and negative regulatory mechanisms for leukocyte migration, such as chemokine synergy and scavenging by decoy receptors.     

Cutting edge: regulation of T cell trafficking and primary immune responses by sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1

Signaling by sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) through its receptor S1P(1) has recently been shown to promote thymocyte egress. In the periphery, S1P(1) is expressed on naive T cells but lost upon T cell activation. To determine the significance of S1P(1) down-regulation and function of S1P(1) in peripheral T cells, we developed transgenic mice that constitutively express S1P(1) in T cells. Mature T cells from these mice exhibited enhanced chemotactic response toward S1P, and preferentially distributed to the blood rather than secondary lymphoid organs. S1P(1)-transgenic mice showed significant delay in the onset of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, and had defective contact hypersensitivity reaction and local Ag-induced responses. These impairments were associated with reduced numbers of Ag-activated T cells in the draining lymph nodes. Our studies demonstrate that S1P(1) signaling affects systemic trafficking of peripheral T cells and immune responses and highlight that levels of S1P(1) expression represent an important mechanism of immune regulation.     

Lysophosphatidic acid and sphingosine 1-phosphate stimulate endothelial cell wound healing

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and sphingosine 1-phosphate(S1P) are potent lipid growth factors with similar abilities tostimulate cytoskeleton-based cellular functions. Their effects aremediated by a subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) encoded by endothelial differentiation genes (edgs). Wehypothesize that large quantities of LPA and S1P generated by activatedplatelets may influence endothelial cell functions. Using an in vitrowound healing assay, we observed that LPA and S1P stimulated closure ofwounded monolayers of human umbilical vein endothelial cells and adultbovine aortic endothelial cells, which express LPA receptor Edg2, andS1P receptors Edg1 and Edg3. The two major components of wound healing,cell migration and proliferation, were stimulated individually by bothlipids. LPA and S1P also stimulated intracellular Ca²⁺mobilization and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)phosphorylation. Pertussis toxin partially blocked the effects of bothlipids on endothelial cell migration, MAPK phosphorylation, andCa²⁺ mobilization, implicatingG_i/_o-coupled Edg receptor signaling inendothelial cells. LPA and S1P did not cross-desensitize each other inCa²⁺ responses, suggesting involvement of distinctreceptors. Thus LPA and S1P affect endothelial cell functions throughsignaling pathways activated by distinct GPCRs and may contribute tothe healing of wounded vasculatures.

     

Targeting chemokine receptors in allergic disease

The directed migration of cells in response to chemical cues is known as chemoattraction, and plays a key role in the temporal and spatial positioning of cells in lower- and higher-order life forms. Key molecules in this process are the chemotactic cytokines, or chemokines, which, in humans, constitute a family of approx. 40 molecules. Chemokines exert their effects by binding to specific GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) which are present on a wide variety of mature cells and their progenitors, notably leucocytes. The inappropriate or excessive generation of chemokines is a key component of the inflammatory response observed in several clinically important diseases, notably allergic diseases such as asthma. Consequently, much time and effort has been directed towards understanding which chemokine receptors and ligands are important in the allergic response with a view to therapeutic intervention. Such strategies can take several forms, although, as the superfamily of GPCRs has historically proved amenable to blockade by small molecules, the development of specific antagonists has been has been a major focus of several groups. In the present review, I detail the roles of chemokines and their receptors in allergic disease and also highlight current progress in the development of relevant chemokine receptor antagonists.     

G protein-coupled receptor crosstalk and signaling in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells

A variety of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is expressed in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HPCs), including the chemokine receptor CXCR4, the leukotriene receptor CysLT1, the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor S1P1, the cannabinoid receptor CB2, and the complement receptor C3aR. While the role of CXCR4 in stem cell homing is largely established, the function of the other GPCRs expressed in HPCs is only partially understood. CXCR4 and CysLT1 inhibit their own activation after ligand binding (homologous desensitization). Stimulation of S1P1 or C3aR has been shown to activate CXCR4 in HPCs that may sensitize CXCR4-dependent stem cell homing. In contrast, activation of CXCR4 results in a loss of CysLT1 function, which is most likely mediated by protein kinase C (PKC) signaling (heterologous desensitization) and could explain the ineffectiveness of CysLT1 antagonists to mobilize HPCs in vivo. Further characterization of GPCR crosstalk will allow a better understanding of HPC trafficking.     

The sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor agonist FTY720 differentially affects the sequestration of CD4+/CD25+ T-regulatory cells and enhances their functional activity

The sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor agonist FTY720 is well known for its immunomodulatory activity, sequestering lymphocytes from blood and spleen into secondary lymphoid organs and thereby preventing their migration to sites of inflammation. Because inflammation is critically dependent on a balance between Ag-specific Th/effector cells and T-regulatory cells, we investigated the effect of FTY720 on T-regulatory cell trafficking and functional activity. An increased number of CD4+/CD25+ T cells was found in blood and spleens of FTY720-treated mice, and transfer of these cells resulted in a significantly more pronounced accumulation in spleens but not lymph nodes after treatment, suggesting that this compound differentially affects the homing properties of T-regulatory cells compared with other T cell subsets. Indeed, CD4+/CD25+ T cells express lower levels of S1P1 and S1P4 receptors and demonstrate a reduced chemotactic response to S1P. Moreover, analysis of the functional response of FTY720-treated CD4+/CD25+ T cells revealed an increased suppressive activity in an in vitro Ag-specific proliferation assay. This correlated with enhanced function in vivo, with T-regulatory cells obtained from FTY720-treated mice being able to suppress OVA-induced airway inflammation. Thus, FTY720 differentially affects the sequestration of T-regulatory cells and importantly, increases the functional activity of T-regulatory cells, suggesting that it may have disease-modifying potential in inflammatory disorders.     

与癌症相关的G 蛋白偶联受体及通路的研究进展

G蛋白偶联受体(G protein-coupled receptors,GPCRs)是一类重要的细胞膜表面跨膜蛋白受体超家族,具有7个跨膜螺旋结构。GPCRs的细胞内信号由G蛋白介导,可将激素、神经递质、药物、趋化因子等多种物理和化学的细胞外刺激穿过细胞膜转导到细胞内不同的效应分子,激活相应的信号级联系统进而影响恶性肿瘤的生长迁移过程。虽然目前药物市场上有很多治疗癌症的小分子药物属于G蛋白受体相关药物,但所作用的靶点集中于少数特定G蛋白偶联受体。因此,新的具有成药性的G蛋白偶联受体的开发具有很大的研究价值和市场潜力。本文主要以在癌症发生、发展中起重要作用的溶血磷脂酸(LPA),G蛋白偶联受体30(GPR30)、内皮素A受体(ETAR)等不同G蛋白偶联受体为分类依据,综述其与相关的信号通路在癌症进程中的作用,并对相应的小分子药物的临床应用和研究进展进行展望。     

Expression of the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor, S1P1, on T-cells controls thymic emigration

S1P(1) is a widely distributed G protein-coupled receptor whose ligand, sphingosine 1-phosphate, is present in high concentrations in the blood. The sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor-signaling pathway is believed to have potent effects on cell trafficking in the immune system. To determine the precise role of the S1P(1) receptor on T-cells, we established a T-cell-specific S1P(1) knock-out mouse. The mutant mice showed a block in the egress of mature T-cells into the periphery. The expression of the S1P(1) receptor was up-regulated in mature thymocytes, and its deletion altered the chemotactic responses of thymocytes to sphingosine 1-phosphate. The results indicated that the expression of the S1P(1) receptor on T-cells controls their exit from the thymus and entry into the blood and, thus, has a central role in regulating the numbers of peripheral T-cells.     

In vivo roles of lysophospholipid receptors revealed by gene targeting studies in mice

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) are extracellular ligands for a family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), LPA1/2/3 and S1P1/2/3/4/5. Through coupling to multiple classes of G proteins and activating multiple signaling pathways, LPA/S1P receptors have been shown to be integral players for many essential cellular and physiological processes. Generation and analysis of mice deficient in each of LPA1, LPA2, S1P1, S1P2, and S1P3 have provided valuable information on the in vivo roles of these receptors. This review is focussed on expression patterns of each receptor gene in wild-type mice, targeted deletion approaches for generating mutant animals, main phenotypes of receptor-null mice, and alterations in signaling characteristics in receptor-deficient primary cells. Altogether, these data give insights to the importance of LPA/S1P receptors at the cellular and organismal level.     

Biochemical regulation of breast cancer cell expression of S1P2 (Edg-5) and S1P3 (Edg-3) G protein-coupled receptors for sphingosine 1-phosphate

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) for lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) transduce signals to many functions of normal cells. Most human cancer cells upregulate S1P and LPA GPCRs, in patterns distinctive for each type of tumor. The findings that 1-alpha, 25-dihydroxy-vitamin D(3) (VD3) and all-trans retinoic acid (RA) differentially alter expression of the predominant S1P(3) (Edg-3) R and S1P(2) (Edg-5) R in human breast cancer cells (BCCs) permitted analyses of their individual activities, despite a lack of selective pharmacological probes. S1P-evoked increases in [Ca(2+)](i) in S1P(3) R-predominant BCCs were suppressed by concentrations of VD3 and RA which decreased expression of S1P(3) Rs, despite RA-induced increases in S1P(2) Rs. S1P-elicited chemokinetic migration of S1P(3) R-predominant BCCs across a type IV collagen-coated micropore filter also was inhibited by concentrations of VD3 and RA which decreased expression of S1P(3) Rs. The RA-induced increase in expression of S1P(2) Rs did not prevent suppression by RA of S1P-elicited chemokinesis, which appears to be mediated by S1P(3) Rs, but instead exposed S1P(2) R-mediated inhibition of epidermal growth factor-stimulated chemotaxis of BCCs. In contrast, expression of the predominant LPA(2) Rs, LPA-evoked increase in [Ca(2+)](i) and LPA-stimulated chemokinetic migration were suppressed concomitantly by RA but not VD3. Thus two structurally-homologous S1P Rs of BCCs differ in coupling to [Ca(2+)](i) signaling and have opposite effects on protein growth factor-stimulated chemotaxis.