The interaction between the regulatory light chain domains on two heads is critical for regulation of smooth muscle myosin

Recent findings have suggested that the interaction between the two heads is critical for phosphorylation-dependent regulation of smooth muscle myosin. We hypothesized that the interaction between the two regulatory light chains on two heads of myosin dictates the regulation of myosin motor function. To evaluate this notion, we engineered and characterized smooth muscle heavy meromyosin (HMM), which is composed of one entire HMM heavy chain and one motor domain truncated heavy chain containing the S2 rod and regulatory light chain (RLC) binding site, as well as the bound RLC (SMDHMM). SMDHMM was inactive for both actin-translocating activity and actin-activated ATPase activity in the dephosphorylated state, demonstrating that the interaction between the two RLC domains on the two heads and/or a motor domain and a RLC domain in a distinct head is sufficient for the inhibition of smooth muscle myosin motor activity. When phosphorylated, SMDHMM was activated for both actin-translocating activity and actin-activated ATPase activity; however, these activities were lower than those of double-headed HMM, implying partial release of inhibition by phosphorylation in SMDHMM and/or cooperativity between the two heads of smooth muscle myosin. The present results indicate that the RLC domain is critical for phosphorylation-dependent regulation of smooth muscle myosin motor activity. On the other hand, similar to double-headed HMM, SMDHMM showed both "folded" and "extended" conformations, and the ratio of those conformations is dependent on ionic strength, suggesting that the RLC domain is sufficient to regulate the conformational transition in myosin.     

Three-dimensional reconstruction of tarantula myosin filaments suggests how phosphorylation may regulate myosin activity

Muscle contraction involves the interaction of the myosin heads of the thick filaments with actin subunits of the thin filaments. Relaxation occurs when this interaction is blocked by molecular switches on these filaments. In many muscles, myosin-linked regulation involves phosphorylation of the myosin regulatory light chains (RLCs). Electron microscopy of vertebrate smooth muscle myosin molecules (regulated by phosphorylation) has provided insight into the relaxed structure, revealing that myosin is switched off by intramolecular interactions between its two heads, the free head and the blocked head. Three-dimensional reconstruction of frozen-hydrated specimens revealed that this asymmetric head interaction is also present in native thick filaments of tarantula striated muscle. Our goal in this study was to elucidate the structural features of the tarantula filament involved in phosphorylation-based regulation. A new reconstruction revealed intra- and intermolecular myosin interactions in addition to those seen previously. To help interpret the interactions, we sequenced the tarantula RLC and fitted an atomic model of the myosin head that included the predicted RLC atomic structure and an S2 (subfragment 2) crystal structure to the reconstruction. The fitting suggests one intramolecular interaction, between the cardiomyopathy loop of the free head and its own S2, and two intermolecular interactions, between the cardiac loop of the free head and the essential light chain of the blocked head and between the Leu305-Gln327 interaction loop of the free head and the N-terminal fragment of the RLC of the blocked head. These interactions, added to those previously described, would help switch off the thick filament. Molecular dynamics simulations suggest how phosphorylation could increase the helical content of the RLC N-terminus, weakening these interactions, thus releasing both heads and activating the thick filament.     

Phosphorylated smooth muscle heavy meromyosin shows an open conformation linked to activation

Smooth muscle myosin and smooth muscle heavy meromyosin (smHMM) are activated by regulatory light chain phosphorylation, but the mechanism remains unclear. Dephosphorylated, inactive smHMM assumes a closed conformation with asymmetric intramolecular head-head interactions between motor domains. The "free head" can bind to actin, but the actin binding interface of the "blocked head" is involved in interactions with the free head. We report here a three-dimensional structure for phosphorylated, active smHMM obtained using electron crystallography of two-dimensional arrays. Head-head interactions of phosphorylated smHMM resemble those found in the dephosphorylated state but occur between different molecules, not within the same molecule. The light chain binding domain structure of phosphorylated smHMM differs markedly from that of the "blocked" head of dephosphorylated smHMM. We hypothesize that regulatory light chain phosphorylation opens the inhibited conformation primarily by its effect on the blocked head. Singly phosphorylated smHMM is not compatible with the closed conformation if the blocked head is phosphorylated. This concept has implications for the extent of myosin activation at low levels of phosphorylation in smooth muscle.     

Role of the essential light chain in the activation of smooth muscle myosin by regulatory light chain phosphorylation

The activity of smooth and non-muscle myosin II is regulated by phosphorylation of the regulatory light chain (RLC) at serine 19. The dephosphorylated state of full-length monomeric myosin is characterized by an asymmetric intramolecular head–head interaction that completely inhibits the ATPase activity, accompanied by a hairpin fold of the tail, which prevents filament assembly. Phosphorylation of serine 19 disrupts these head–head interactions by an unknown mechanism. Computational modeling (Tama et al., 2005. J. Mol. Biol. 345, 837–854) suggested that formation of the inhibited state is characterized by both torsional and bending motions about the myosin heavy chain (HC) at a location between the RLC and the essential light chain (ELC). Therefore, altering relative motions between the ELC and the RLC at this locus might disrupt the inhibited state. Based on this hypothesis we have derived an atomic model for the phosphorylated state of the smooth muscle myosin light chain domain (LCD). This model predicts a set of specific interactions between the N-terminal residues of the RLC with both the myosin HC and the ELC. Site directed mutagenesis was used to show that interactions between the phosphorylated N-terminus of the RLC and helix-A of the ELC are required for phosphorylation to activate smooth muscle myosin.     

Two new modes of smooth muscle myosin regulation by the interaction between the two regulatory light chains, and by the S2 domain

Previous studies indicated that single-headed smooth muscle myosin and S1 (a single head fragment) are not regulated through phosphorylation of the regulatory light chain (RLC). To investigate the importance of the double-headedness of myosin and of the S2 region for the phosphorylation-dependent regulation, we made three types of recombinant mutant smooth muscle HMMs with one intact head and an N-terminally truncated head. The truncated head of Delta MD lacked the motor domain, that of Delta(MD+ELC) lacked the motor and essential light chain binding domains, and single-headed HMM had one intact head alone. The basal ATPase activities of the three mutants decreased as the KCl concentration became less than 0.1 M. Such a decrease was not observed for S1, which had no S2 region, suggesting that S2 is necessary for this myosin behavior. This activity decrease also disappeared when RLCs of Delta MD and Delta(MD+ELC), but that of single-headed HMM, were phosphorylated. When their RLCs were unphosphorylated, the three mutants exhibited similar actin-activated ATPase levels. However, when they were phosphorylated, the actin-activated ATPase activities of Delta MD and Delta(MD+ELC) increased to the S1 level, while that of single-headed HMM remained unchanged. Even in the phosphorylated state, the actin-activated ATPase activities of the three mutants and S1 were much lower than that of wild-type HMM. We propose that S2 has an inhibitory function that is canceled by an interaction between two phosphorylated RLCs. We also propose that a cooperative interaction between two motor domains is required for a higher level of actin activation.     

Dynamic modulation of the regulatory domain of myosin heads by pH, ionic strength, and RLC phosphorylation in synthetic myosin filaments

The position of the myosin head with respect to the filament backbone is thought to be a function of pH, ionic strength (micro) and the extent of regulatory light chain (RLC) phosphorylation [Harrington (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 5066-5070]. The object of this study is to examine the dynamics of the proximal part of the myosin head (regulatory domain) which accompany the changes in head disposition. The essential light chain was labeled at Cys177 with the indanedione spin-label followed by the exchange of the labeled proteins into myosin. The mobility of the labeled domain was investigated with saturation transfer electron paramagnetic resonance in reconstituted, synthetic myosin filaments. We have found that the release of the heads from the myosin filament surface by reduction of electrostatic charge is accompanied by a 2-fold increase in the mobility of the regulatory domain. Phosphorylation of the RLC by myosin light chain kinase resulted in a smaller 1. 5-fold increase of motion, establishing that the head disordering observed by electron microscopy [Levine et al. (1996) Biophys. J. 71, 898-907] is due to increased mobility of the heads. This result indirectly supports the hypothesis that the RLC phosphorylation effect on potentiation of force arises from a release of heads from the filament surface and a shift of the heads toward actin.     

Chimaeric myosin regulatory light chains: sub-domain switching experiments to analyse the function of the N-terminal EF hand.

The regulatory light chains (RLCs) located on the myosin head, regulate the interaction of myosin with actin in response to either Ca2+ or phosphorylation signals. The RLCs belong to a family of calcium binding proteins and are composed of four "EF hand" ancestral calcium binding motifs (numbered I to IV). To determine the role of the first EF hand (EF hand I) in the regulatory process, chimaeric light chains were constructed by protein engineering, by switching this region between smooth muscle and skeletal muscle myosin RLCs. For example, chimaera G(I)S consisted of EF hand I of the smooth muscle (gizzard) RLC and EF hands II to IV of the skeletal muscle RLC, whereas chimaera S(I)G consisted of EF hand I of the skeletal muscle RLC and EF hands II to IV of the smooth muscle RLC. The chimaeric RLCs were expressed in Escherichia coli using the pLcII expression system, and after isolation and purification their regulatory properties were compared with those of wild-type smooth and skeletal muscle myosin RLCs. The chimaeric RLCs bound to the myosin heads in scallop striated muscle myofibrils from which the endogenous RLCs had been removed ("desensitized" myofibrils) with similar affinities to those of the wild-type smooth and skeletal muscle RLCs. Both chimaeric RLCs were able to regulate the actin-activated Mg(2+)-ATPase activity of scallop myosin: G(I)S inhibited the ATPase in the presence and absence of Ca2+, like the wild-type skeletal muscle RLC, while S(I)G inhibited the myosin ATPase in the absence of Ca2+, and this inhibition was relieved on Ca2+ addition, in the same way as the wild-type smooth muscle RLC. Thus the type of regulation that the RLCs confer on the myosin is determined by the source of EF hands II to IV rather than that of EF hand I.     

Calponin binds to the 20-kilodalton regulatory light chain of myosin

Calponin (CaP) is a 34 kDa smooth muscle-specific protein that has been implicated in regulation of smooth muscle contractility. Two CaP binding sites on smooth muscle myosin rod have been recently described [Szymanski and Tao (1997) J.Biol.Chem. 272, 11142-11146]. We used a combination of cosedimentation, overlay, and fluorescence assays to determine the interaction between CaP and both subfragment 1 of myosin and isolated 20 kDa regulatory light chain of myosin (RLC). Subfragment 1, which was generated by cleavage of myosin with Staphylococcus aureus protease (myosin S1SA) inhibits cosedimentation of CaP with myosin filaments. Fluorescence assay showed that CaP labeled with fluorescent label (DAN-CaP) interacts with myosin S1SA in solution via a single class of binding sites. The binding constant (kaff) of this interaction at 50 mM NaCl is (2. 1 +/- 0.2) x 10(6) M-1 (n = 3). The interaction between DAN-CaP and myosin S1SA depends on ionic strength, and the EC50 of inhibition of this interaction occurs at about 130 mM NaCl. In contrast, the subfragment 1 that was generated by papain digestion (myosin S1PA), which cleaves RLC 4 kDa away from the NH2-terminal end of the molecule, does not interact with DAN-CaP. Overlay and fluorescent assay in solution showed that CaP binds to isolated RLC, suggesting that the interaction between CaP and subfragment 1 of myosin is due to a direct binding of CaP to RLC. CaP binding to myosin S1SA is stronger than to subfragment 2 in physiological salt concentrations. CaP binding to myosin head strengthened upon phosphorylation of RLC by Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent myosin light chain kinase. We suggest that CaP binds to subfragment 1 of myosin, exclusively via the NH2-terminal end of RLC, and this interaction could play a role in regulation of the actin-myosin interaction in smooth muscle contractility.     

Orientation of the N-terminal lobe of the myosin regulatory light chain in skeletal muscle fibers

The orientation of the N-terminal lobe of the myosin regulatory light chain (RLC) in demembranated fibers of rabbit psoas muscle was determined by polarized fluorescence. The native RLC was replaced by a smooth muscle RLC with a bifunctional rhodamine probe attached to its A, B, C, or D helix. Fiber fluorescence data were interpreted using the crystal structure of the head domain of chicken skeletal myosin in the nucleotide-free state. The peak angle between the lever axis of the myosin head and the fiber or actin filament axis was 100—110° in relaxation, isometric contraction, and rigor. In each state the hook helix was at an angle of ～40° to the lever/filament plane. The in situ orientation of the RLC D and E helices, and by implication of its N- and C-lobes, was similar in smooth and skeletal RLC isoforms. The angle between these two RLC lobes in rigor fibers was different from that in the crystal structure. These results extend previous crystallographic evidence for bending between the two lobes of the RLC to actin-attached myosin heads in muscle fibers, and suggest that such bending may have functional significance in contraction and regulation of vertebrate striated muscle.     

Phosphorylation regulates the ADP-induced rotation of the light chain domain of smooth muscle myosin.

We have observed the effects of MgADP and thiophosphorylation on the conformational state of the light chain domain of myosin in skinned smooth muscle. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy was used to monitor the orientation of spin probes attached to the myosin regulatory light chain (RLC). Two spectral states were seen, termed here "intermediate" and "final", that are distinguished by a approximately 24 degrees axial rotation of spin probes attached to the RLC. The two observed conformations are similar to those found previously for smooth muscle myosin S1; the final state corresponds to the major conformation of S1 in the absence of ADP, while the intermediate state corresponds to the conformation of S1 with ADP bound. Light chain domain orientation was observed as a function of the MgADP concentration and the extent of RLC thiophosphorylation. In rigor (no MgADP), LC domains were distributed equally between the intermediate state and the final state; upon addition of saturating (3.5 mM) MgADP, about one-third of the LC domains in the final state rotated approximately 20 degrees axially to the intermediate state. The progression of the change in populations was fit to a simple binding equation, yielding an apparent dissociation constant of approximately 110 microM for skinned smooth muscle fibers and approximately 730 microM for thiophosphorylated, skinned smooth muscle fibers. These observations suggest a model that explains the behavior of "latch bridges" in smooth muscle.     

Regulation by molluscan myosins

Molluscan myosins are regulated molecules that control muscle contraction by the selective binding of calcium. The essential and the regulatory light chains are regulatory subunits. Scallop myosin is the favorite material for studying the interactions of the light chains with the myosin heavy chain since the regulatory light chains can be reversibly removed from it and its essential light chains can be exchanged. Mutational and structural studies show that the essential light chain binds calcium provided that the Ca-binding loop is stabilized by specific interactions with the regulatory light chain and the heavy chain. The regulatory light chains are inhibitory subunits. Regulation requires the presence of both myosin heads and an intact headrod junction. Heavy meromyosin is regulated and shows cooperative features of activation while subfragment-1 is non-cooperative. The myosin heavy chains of the functionally different phasic striated and the smooth catch muscle myosins are products of a single gene, the isoforms arise from alternative splicing. The differences between residues of the isoforms are clustered at surface loop-1 of the heavy chain and account for the different ATPase activity of the two muscle types. Catch muscles contain two regulatory light chain isoforms, one phosphorylatable by gizzard myosin light chain kinase. Phosphorylation of the light chain does not alter ATPase activity. We could not find evidence that light chain phosphorylation is responsible for the catch state.     

Essential light chain modulates phosphorylation-dependent regulation of smooth muscle myosin

To examine the functional role of the essential light chain (ELC) in the phosphorylation-dependent regulation of smooth muscle myosin, we replace the native light chain in smooth muscle myosin with bacterially expressed chimeric ELCs in which one or two of the four helix-loop-helix domains of chicken gizzard ELC were substituted by the corresponding domains of scallop (Aquipecten irradians) ELC. All of these myosins, regardless of the ELC mutations or regulatory light chain (RLC) phosphorylation, showed normal subunit constitutions and NH(4)(+)/EDTA-ATPase activities, both of which were similar to those of native myosin. None of the ELC mutations changed the actin-activated ATPase activity of myosin in the absence of RLC phosphorylation. However, in the presence of RLC phosphorylation, the substitution of domain 1 or 2 in the ELC significantly decreased the actin-activated ATPase activity, whereas the substitution of both of these domains did not change the activity. In contrast to myosin, the domain 2 substitution in the ELC did not affect the actin-activated ATPase activity of single-headed myosin subfragment 1. These results suggest an interhead interaction between domains 1 and 2 of ELCs which is required to attain the full actin-activated ATPase activity of smooth muscle myosin in the presence of RLC phosphorylation.     

Phosphorylation of smooth muscle myosin heads regulates the head-induced movement of tropomyosin

It has been shown that skeletal and smooth muscle myosin heads binding to actin results in the movement of smooth muscle tropomyosin, as revealed by a change in fluorescence resonance energy transfer between a fluorescence donor on tropomyosin and an acceptor on actin (Graceffa, P. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 11984-11992). In this work, tropomyosin movement was similarly monitored as a function of unphosphorylated and phosphorylated smooth muscle myosin double-headed fragment smHMM. In the absence of nucleotide and at low myosin head/actin ratios, only phosphorylated heads induced a change in energy transfer. In the presence of ADP, the effect of head phosphorylation was even more dramatic, in that at all levels of myosin head/actin, phosphorylation was necessary to affect energy transfer. It is proposed that the regulation of tropomyosin position on actin by phosphorylation of myosin heads plays a key role in the regulation of smooth muscle contraction. In contrast, actin-bound caldesmon was not moved by myosin heads at low head/actin ratios, as uncovered by fluorescence resonance energy transfer and disulfide cross-linking between caldesmon and actin. At higher head concentration caldesmon was dissociated from actin, consistent with the multiple binding model for the binding of caldesmon and myosin heads to actin (Chen, Y., and Chalovich, J. M. (1992) Biophys. J. 63, 1063-1070).     

A new model for the surface arrangement of myosin molecules in tarantula thick filaments

Three-dimensional reconstructions of the negatively stained thick filaments of tarantula muscle with a resolution of 50 A have previously suggested that the helical tracks of myosin heads are zigzagged, short diagonal ridges being connected by nearly axial links. However, surface views of lower contour levels reveal an additional J-shaped feature approximately the size and shape of a myosin head.We have modelled the surface array of myosin heads on the filaments using as a building block a model of a two-headed regulated myosin molecule in which the regulatory light chains of the two heads together form a compact head-tail junction. Four parameters defining the radius, orientation and rotation of each myosin molecule were varied. In addition, the heads were allowed independently to bend in a plane perpendicular to the coiled-coil tail at three sites, and to tilt with respect to the tail and to twist at one of these sites. After low-pass filtering, models were aligned with the reconstruction, scored by cross-correlation and refined by simulated annealing.Comparison of the geometry of the reconstruction and the distance between domains in the myosin molecule narrowed the choice of models to two main classes. A good match to the reconstruction was obtained with a model in which each ridge is formed from the motor domain of a head pointing to the bare zone together with the head-tail junction of a neighbouring molecule. The heads pointing to the Z-disc intermittently occupy the J-position. Each motor domain interacts with the essential and regulatory light chains of the neighbouring heads. A near-radial spoke in the reconstruction connecting the backbone to one end of the ridge can be identified as the start of the coiled-coil tail.     

The N-terminal lobes of both regulatory light chains interact with the tail domain in the 10 S-inhibited conformation of smooth muscle myosin

In the presence of ATP, unphosphorylated smooth muscle myosin can form a catalytically inactive monomer that sediments at 10 Svedbergs (10 S). The tail of 10 S bends into thirds and interacts with the regulatory domain. ADP-P(i) is "trapped" at the active site, and consequently the ATPase activity is extremely low. We are interested in the structural basis for maintenance of this off state. Our prior photocross-linking work with 10 S showed that tail residues 1554-1583 are proximal to position 108 in the C-terminal lobe of one of the two regulatory light chains ( Olney, J. J., Sellers, J. R., and Cremo, C. R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20375-20384 ). These data suggested that the tail interacts with only one of the two regulatory light chains. Here we present data, using a photocross-linker on position 59 on the N-terminal lobe of the regulatory light chain (RLC), demonstrating that both regulatory light chains of a single molecule can cross-link to the light meromyosin portion of the tail. Mass spectrometric data show four specific cross-linked regions spanning residues 1428-1571 in the light meromyosin portion of the tail, consistent with cross-linking two RLC to one light meromyosin. In addition, we find that position 59 can cross-link internally to residues 42-45 within the same RLC subunit. The internal cross-link only forms in 10 S and not in unphosphorylated heavy meromyosin (lacking the light meromyosin), suggesting a structural rearrangement within the RLC attributed to the interaction of the tail with the head.     

Role of the tail in the regulated state of myosin 2

Myosin 2 from vertebrate smooth muscle or non-muscle sources is in equilibrium between compact, inactive monomers and thick filaments under physiological conditions. In the inactive monomer, the two heads pack compactly together, and the long tail is folded into three closely packed segments that are associated chiefly with one of the heads. The molecular basis of the folding of the tail remains unexplained. By using electron microscopy, we show that compact monomers of smooth muscle myosin 2 have the same structure in both the native state and following specific, intramolecular photo-cross-linking between Cys109 of the regulatory light chain (RLC) and segment 3 of the tail. Nonspecific cross-linking between lysine residues of the folded monomer by glutaraldehyde also does not perturb the compact conformation and stabilizes it against unfolding at high ionic strength. Sequence comparisons across phyla and myosin 2 isoforms suggest that the folding of the tail is stabilized by ionic interactions between the positively charged N-terminal sequence of the RLC and a negatively charged region near the start of tail segment 3 and that phosphorylation of the RLC could perturb these interactions. Our results support the view that interactions between the heads and the distal tail perform a critical role in regulating activity of myosin 2 molecules through stabilizing the compact monomer conformation.     

Regulation of asymmetric smooth muscle myosin II molecules

The emerging view of smooth/nonmuscle myosin regulation suggests that the attainment of the completely inhibited state requires numerous weak interactions between components of the two heads and the myosin rod. To further examine the nature of the structural requirements for regulation, we engineered smooth muscle heavy meromyosin molecules that contained one complete head and truncations of the second head. These truncations eliminated the motor domain but retained two, one, or no light chains. All constructs contained 37 heptads of rod sequence. None of the truncated constructs displayed complete regulation of both ATPase and motility, reinforcing the idea that interactions between motor domains are necessary for complete regulation. Surprisingly, the rate of ADP release was slowed by regulatory light chain dephosphorylation of the truncated construct that contained all four light chains and one motor domain. These data suggest that there is a second step (ADP release) in the smooth muscle myosin-actin-activated ATPase cycle that is modulated by regulatory light chain phosphorylation. This may be part of the mechanism underlying "latch" in smooth muscle.     

Asymmetric photocross-linking of singly phosphorylated smooth muscle heavy meromyosin

Although activities of smooth muscle myosin are regulated by phosphorylation, the molecular mechanisms of regulation have not been fully established. Phosphorylation of both heads of myosin is known to activate ATPase and motor activities, but the effects of phosphorylation of only one of the heads have not been established. Such information on singly phosphorylated myosin can serve to elucidate the molecular mechanism of the phosphorylation-dependent regulation. To understand the structural properties of the singly phosphorylated state, we prepared singly phosphorylated heavy meromyosin (HMM) containing a photoreactive benzophenone-labeled RLC and examined its photocross-linking reactivity. The two heads in the singly phosphorylated HMM showed different reactivities. The dephosphorylated RLC in the singly phosphorylated HMM was cross-linked to a heavy chain, like that in the dephosphorylated HMM, whereas the phosphorylated RLC did not react, like that in the fully phosphorylated HMM. These results indicate that the two heads of the singly phosphorylated HMM have an asymmetric structure, suggesting that phosphorylation of one head can to some extent activate smooth muscle HMM.     

The "roll and lock" mechanism of force generation in muscle

Muscle force results from the interaction of the globular heads of myosin-II with actin filaments. We studied the structure-function relationship in the myosin motor in contracting muscle fibers by using temperature jumps or length steps combined with time-resolved, low-angle X-ray diffraction. Both perturbations induced simultaneous changes in the active muscle force and in the extent of labeling of the actin helix by stereo-specifically bound myosin heads at a constant total number of attached heads. The generally accepted hypothesis assumes that muscle force is generated solely by tilting of the lever arm, or the light chain domain of the myosin head, about its catalytic domain firmly bound to actin. Data obtained suggest an additional force-generating step: the "roll and lock" transition of catalytic domains of non-stereo-specifically attached heads to a stereo-specifically bound state. A model based on this scheme is described to quantitatively explain the data.     

Stepping between Membrane Microdomains

In isolated thick filaments from many types of muscle, the two head domains of each myosin molecule are folded back against the filament backbone in a conformation called the interacting heads motif (IHM) in which actin interaction is inhibited. This conformation is present in resting skeletal muscle, but it is not known how exit from the IHM state is achieved during muscle activation. Here, we investigated this by measuring the in situ conformation of the light chain domain of the myosin heads in relaxed demembranated fibers from rabbit psoas muscle using fluorescence polarization from bifunctional rhodamine probes at four sites on the C-terminal lobe of the myosin regulatory light chain (RLC). The order parameter 〈P₂〉 describing probe orientation with respect to the filament axis had a roughly sigmoidal dependence on temperature in relaxing conditions, with a half-maximal change at ∼19°C. Either lattice compression by 5% dextran T500 or addition of 25 μM blebbistatin decreased the transition temperature to ∼14°C. Maximum entropy analysis revealed three preferred orientations of the myosin RLC region at 25°C and above, two with its long axis roughly parallel to the filament axis and one roughly perpendicular. The parallel orientations are similar to those of the so-called blocked and free heads in the IHM and are stabilized by either lattice compression or blebbistatin. In relaxed skeletal muscle at near-physiological temperature and myofilament lattice spacing, the majority of the myosin heads have their light chain domains in IHM-like conformations, with a minority in a distinct conformation with their RLC regions roughly perpendicular to the filament axis. None of these three orientation populations were present during active contraction. These results are consistent with a regulatory transition of the thick filament in skeletal muscle associated with a conformational equilibrium of the myosin heads.