Bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia

Bundle branch reentrant (BBR) tachycardia is an uncommon form of ventricular tachycardia (VT) incorporating both bundle branches into the reentry circuit. The arrhythmia is usually seen in patients with an acquired heart disease and significant conduction system impairment, although patients with structurally normal heart have been described. Surface ECG in sinus rhythm (SR) characteristically shows intraventricular conduction defects. Patients typically present with presyncope, syncope or sudden death because of VT with fast rates frequently above 200 beats per minute. The QRS morphology during VT is a typical bundle branch block pattern, usually left bundle branch block, and may be identical to that in SR. Prolonged His-ventricular (H-V) interval in SR is found in the majority of patients with BBR VT, although some patients may have the H-V interval within normal limits. The diagnosis of BBR VT is based on electrophysiological findings and pacing maneuvers that prove participation of the His- Purkinje system in the tachycardia mechanism. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of a bundle branch can cure BBR VT and is currently regarded as the first line therapy. The technique of choice is ablation of the right bundle. The reported incidence of clinically significant conduction system impairment requiring implantation of a permanent pacemaker varies from 0% to 30%. Long-term outcome depends on the underlying cardiac disease. Patients with poor systolic left ventricular function are at risk of sudden death or death from progressive heart failure despite successful BBR VT ablation and should be considered for an implantable cardiovertor-defibrillator.     

Persistent ventricular preexcitation despite right bundle branch block

A 44-year-old man with a history of ventricular preexcitation and supraventricular tachycardia was evaluated. The baseline electrocardiogram exhibited ventricular preexcitation with a normal PR interval and a minimally negative delta wave in lead V1 and positive delta waves in the inferior leads. The administration of adenosine resulted in a progressive prolongation of the PR interval with a fixed preexcitation degree, suggesting the presence of antegrade conduction over the fasciculo-ventricular pathway. When complete right bundle branch block occurred, the degree of preexcitation never changed. These findings suggested that the fasciculo-ventricular pathway was likely to be connected to the left-sided His-Purkinje system.     

Coexistence of a bradycardia- and tachycardia-dependent bundle branch block

Aberrant ventricular conduction is a rare phenomenon as compared with the more frequently occurring antrioventricular conduction disturbances. It leads to widening of the QRS complex, which is either due to a complete or functional block in one of the bundle branches or a block within the intramyocardial conduction system itself. Mechanisms that are potentially involved in the genesis of aberrant ventricular conduction are sudden shortening of cycle length (tachycardia-dependent phase III), antegrade block with retrograde concealed conduction, or bradycardia-dependent block (enhanced phase IV). In this paper, we present a patient with aberrant ventricular conduction with the occurrence of a tachycardia-dependent, as well as a bradycardia-dependent bundle branch block, which is an even rarer phenomenon.     

The left bundle branch block revised with novel imaging modalities

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is related to abnormal cardiac conduction and mechanical asynchrony and is associated with hypertension and coronary artery disease. Improved evaluation of left ventricular (LV) mechanical asynchrony is needed, because of the increasing number of patients with LBBB and heart failure. In this paper, we describe tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), strain (rate) imaging and tissue tracking in LBBB patients. A variety of patterns of mechanical activation can be observed in LBBB patients. A recent development, referred to as tissue synchronisation imaging, colour codes TDI time-to-peak systolic velocities of segments and displays mechanical asynchrony. Furthermore, real-time 3D echocardiography provides new regional information about mechanical asynchrony. Contained in an LV model and projected on a bull''s eye plot, this modality helps to display the spatial distribution of mechanical asynchrony. Finally, segmental time-to-peak circumferential strain curves, produced by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, provide additional quantification of LV mechanical asynchrony. Effects of LBBB on regional and global cardiac function are impressive, myocardial involvement seems to play a role and with the help of these novel imaging modalities, new insights continue to develop.     

Selective left bundle branch pacing for pediatric complete heart block

Traditionally Right Ventricle has been the preferred site of pacing for the management of symptomatic brady-arrhythmias. The deleterious effect of chronic RV pacing has been shown by several studies. This has generated interest into a novel pacing strategy called physiological pacing wherein the His bundle or the left bundle is paced directly with 4.1 F pacing lead. Herewith we are reporting a case of congenital complete heart block in a 13-year-old child for whom selective left bundle branch pacing was done. This physiological pacing will ensure a synchronized contraction of the ventricles thereby avoiding the deleterious effect of RV pacing.     

Tailoring cardiac resynchronisation therapy to non-left bundle branch block: Successful cardiac resynchronisation for right bundle branch block with left posterior fascicular block without implantation of a left ventricular lead

Despite advances, cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) remains fundamentally orientated to the dyssynchrony of left bundle branch block (LBBB), in which septo-lateral electrical and mechanical delays predominate. For non-LBBB patients response rates to conventional CRT are lower and mortality and rehospitalisation rates are not reduced. Despite this, alternative approaches which tailor CRT to the differing dyssynchrony patterns of non-LBBB have yet to be developed. In the specific non-LBBB subgroup of right bundle branch block (RBBB) with left posterior fascicular block (LPFB), ventricular conduction via the left anterior fascicle results in a unique early lateral, and late septal depolarisation, or lateral to septal left ventricular (LV) delay, an electrical sequence which is followed mechanically. This latero-septal delay is somewhat the reverse of LBBB and was overcome by fusing right ventricular (RV) septal pacing with intrinsic conduction via the left anterior fascicle, achieving successful resynchronisation without implantation of a left ventricular lead. A stable fusion pattern was achieved via the ‘Negative AV Hysteresis with Search’ algorithm (Abbott, St Paul, Minnesota). Improvement in all standard CRT response indices was achieved at 3 months: QRS duration was reduced from 153 to 106 ms, ejection fraction increased from 14 to 32%, and LV end-systolic and end-diastolic diameters reduced by 19% and 12.5% respectively. NYHA class improved from III-IV to class II. Cardiac resynchronisation for RBBB with LPFB can be successfully achieved with a standard pacemaker or defibrillator without left ventricular lead implantation by fusing RV septal-only pacing with intrinsic conduction.     

Left ventricular resynchronization therapy in a canine model of left bundle branch block

Positive responses to left (LV) and biventricular (BV) stimulation observed in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) suggest a possible mechanism of LV resynchronization. An anesthetized canine LBBB model was developed using radio frequency ablation. Before and after ablation, LV pressure derivative over time (dP/dt) and aortic pulse pressure (PP) were assessed during normal sinus rhythm with right ventricle (RV), LV, or BV stimulation combined with four atrioventricular delays in six dogs. In three more dogs, M-mode echocardiograms of septal and LV posterior wall motion were obtained before and after LBBB and during LV stimulation. LBBB caused QRS widening and hemodynamics deterioration. Before ablation, stimulation alone worsened LV dP/dt and PP. After ablation, LV and BV stimulation maximally increased LV dP/dt by 16% and PP by 7% (P < 0.001), whereas little improvement was observed during RV stimulation. M-mode echocardiogram showed that LBBB resulted in a paradoxical septal wall motion that was corrected by LV stimulation. In conclusion, LV and BV stimulation improved cardiac function in a canine LBBB model via resynchronization of LV excitation and contraction.     

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with left bundle branch block with residual conduction

AimTo evaluate whether left bundle branch block with residual conduction (rLBBB) is associated with worse outcomes after cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT).MethodsAll consecutive CRT implants at our institution between 2006 and 2013 were identified from our local device registry. Pre- and post-implant patient specific data were extracted from clinical records.ResultsA total of 690 CRT implants were identified during the study period. Prior to CRT, 52.2% of patients had true left bundle branch block (LBBB), 19.1% a pacing-induced LBBB (pLBBB), 11.2% a rLBBB, 0.8% a right bundle branch block (RBBB), and 16.5% had a nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) electrocardiogram pattern. Mean age at implant was 67.5 years (standard deviation [SD] = 10.6), mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) was 25.7% (SD = 7.9%), and mean QRS duration was 158.4 ms (SD = 32 ms). After CRT, QRS duration was significantly reduced in the LBBB (p < 0.001), pLBBB (p < 0.001), rLBBB (p < 0.001), RBBB (p = 0.04), and IVCD groups (p = 0.03). LV EF significantly improved in the LBBB (p < 0.001), rLBBB (p = 0.002), and pLBBB (p < 0.001) groups, but the RBBB and IVCD groups showed no improvement. There was no significant difference in mortality between the LBBB and rLBBB groups. LV EF post-CRT, chronic kidney disease, hyperkalaemia, hypernatremia, and age at implant were significant predictors of mortality.ConclusionCRT in patients with rLBBB results in improved LV EF and similar mortality rates to CRT patients with complete LBBB. Predictors of mortality post-CRT include post-CRT LV EF, presence of CKD, hyperkalaemia, hypernatremia, and older age at implant.