Structural scaffold for eIF4E binding selectivity of 4E‐BP isoforms: crystal structure of eIF4E binding region of 4E‐BP2 and its comparison with that of 4E‐BP1

To clarify the higher eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) binding selectivity of 4E‐binding protein 2 (4E‐BP2) than of 4E‐BP1, as determined by Trp fluorescence analysis, the crystal structure of the eIF4E binding region of 4E‐BP2 in complex with m⁷GTP‐bound human eIF4E has been determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis and compared with that of 4E‐BP1. The crystal structure revealed that the Pro47‐Ser65 moiety of 4E‐BP2 adopts a L ‐shaped conformation involving extended and α‐helical structures and extends over the N‐terminal loop and two different helix regions of eIF4E through hydrogen bonds, and electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions; these features were similarly observed for 4E‐BP1. Although the pattern of the overall interaction of 4E‐BP2 with eIF4E was similar to that of 4E‐BP1, a notable difference was observed for the 60–63 sequence in relation to the conformation and binding selectivity of the 4E‐BP isoform, i.e. Met‐Glu‐Cys‐Arg for 4E‐BP1 and Leu‐Asp‐Arg‐Arg for 4E‐BP2. In this paper, we report that the structural scaffold of the eIF4E binding preference for 4E‐BP2 over 4E‐BP1 is based on the stacking of the Arg63 planar side chain on the Trp73 indole ring of eIF4E and the construction of a compact hydrophobic space around the Trp73 indole ring by the Leu59‐Leu60 sequence of 4E‐BP2. Copyright © 2011 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

4E-BP1 degradation and eIF4E truncation occur spatially distinctly in the porcine uterine epithelia and are features of noninvasive implantation in the pig

The implantation of the blastocyst into the endometrium is an indispensable premise for successful embryonic development. This process is regulated by maternal and embryonic signals that influence gene expression at the translational level, among other processes. Recently, we have shown that proteolytical cleavage of the prototypical 25‐kDa, mRNA cap‐binding protein eIF4E produces a stable variant with a molecular mass of approximately 23 kDa exclusively in the porcine endometrium during implantation. This is accompanied by dephosphorylation and reduction of the abundant repressor 4E‐BP1. Here, we investigate the distribution of the truncated eIF4E and of 4E‐BP1 in the porcine uterine tissue, their binding in native samples, and we analyzed eIF4E‐, eIF4G‐, and 4E‐BP1‐specific proteolytic activities. Our results show that in pigs, the truncated eIF4E is located in the endometrial luminal epithelium during implantation. Neither glandulary tissue nor stroma expressed any truncated eIF4E. The reduced abundance of 4E‐BP1 during implantation is mainly the result of decay in the glandular epithelia. Moreover, steroid replacements, in vitro protease assays, and cell lysate fractionation showed that eIF4E cleavage and 4E‐BP1 decay both depended on the ovarian steroid hormones estradiol and progestrone, but these effects are the result of different proteolytic activities. Although eIF4G cleavage also depends on calcium, stimulation by these steroids could not be established. We propose that the translation initiation process in the endometrium is differently regulated by the truncated eIF4E, utilizing different abundances of 4E‐BP1 and binding dynamic of eIF4E/4E‐BP1 in distinct forms of implantation. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 78:895–905, 2011. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

eIF4E‐Binding proteins are differentially modified after ammonia versus intracellular calcium activation of sea urchin unfertilized eggs

Fertilization of sea urchin eggs triggers a rise of protein synthesis mainly dependent on the cap‐binding protein eIF4E, which is released from its repressor 4E‐BP and associates with eIF4G. Association of eIF4G with eIF4E is a crucial event for the onset of the first mitotic division following fertilization. Artificial activation of unfertilized eggs with the calcium ionophore A23187 results in the activation of protein synthesis comparable to the one triggered by fertilization, while increasing the intracellular pH by ammonia treatment results in partial activation of protein synthesis. Nevertheless, artificial activation does not induce the mitotic division. Here we investigate the effect of calcium ionophore and ammonia treatment of unfertilized eggs on eIF4E and its two antagonist partners, 4E‐BP and eIF4G. We show that the addition of calcium ionophore to unfertilized eggs induces permanent dissociation between eIF4E and 4E‐BP, whereas a reversible dissociation of the complex occurs after ammonia treatment. The regulation of the complex correlates with permanent or reversible 4E‐BP disappearance depending on the treatment used to trigger artificial activation. Furthermore, while calcium ionophore treatment of unfertilized eggs induces eIF4G modifications comparable to those observed following fertilization, ammonia treatment does not. These results suggest that ionophore and ammonia treatments of unfertilized eggs induce differential protein synthesis activation by targeting eIF4E availability and specific regulation through its two partners 4E‐BP and eIF4G. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 77: 83–91, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Activation of p53 stimulates proteasome-dependent truncation of eIF4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1)

Background information. The translational inhibitor protein 4E‐BP1 [eIF4E (eukaryotic initiation factor 4E)‐binding protein 1] regulates the availability of polypeptide chain initiation factor eIF4E for protein synthesis. Initiation factor eIF4E binds the 5′ cap structure present on all cellular mRNAs. Its ability to associate with initiation factors eIF4G and eIF4A, forming the eIF4F complex, brings the mRNA to the 43S complex during the initiation of translation. Binding of eIF4E to eIF4G is inhibited in a competitive manner by 4E‐BP1. Phosphorylation of 4E‐BP1 decreases the affinity of this protein for eIF4E, thus favouring the binding of eIF4G and enhancing translation. We have previously shown that induction or activation of the tumour suppressor protein p53 rapidly leads to 4E‐BP1 dephosphorylation, resulting in sequestration of eIF4E, decreased formation of the eIF4F complex and inhibition of protein synthesis. Results. We now report that activation of p53 also results in modification of 4E‐BP1 to a truncated form. Unlike full‐length 4E‐BP1, which is reversibly phosphorylated at multiple sites, the truncated protein is almost completely unphosphorylated. Moreover, the latter interacts with eIF4E in preference to full‐length 4E‐BP1. Inhibitor studies indicate that the p53‐induced cleavage of 4E‐BP1 is mediated by the proteasome and is blocked by conditions that inhibit the dephosphorylation of full‐length 4E‐BP1. Measurements of the turnover of 4E‐BP1 indicate that the truncated form is much more stable than the full‐length protein. Conclusions. The results suggest a model in which proteasome activity gives rise to a stable, hypophosphorylated and truncated form of 4E‐BP1, which may exert a long‐term inhibitory effect on the availability of eIF4E, thus contributing to the inhibition of protein synthesis and the growth‐inhibitory and pro‐apoptotic effects of p53.     

Tristetraprolin Recruits Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E2 To Repress Translation of AU-Rich Element-Containing mRNAs

Tristetraprolin (TTP) regulates the expression of AU-rich element-containing mRNAs through promoting the degradation and repressing the translation of target mRNA. While the mechanism for promoting target mRNA degradation has been extensively studied, the mechanism underlying translational repression is not well established. Here, we show that TTP recruits eukaryotic initiation factor 4E2 (eIF4E2) to repress target mRNA translation. TTP interacted with eIF4E2 but not with eIF4E. Overexpression of eIF4E2 enhanced TTP-mediated translational repression, and downregulation of endogenous eIF4E2 or overexpression of a truncation mutant of eIF4E2 impaired TTP-mediated translational repression. Overexpression of an eIF4E2 mutant that lost the cap-binding activity also impaired TTP''s activity, suggesting that the cap-binding activity of eIF4E2 is important in TTP-mediated translational repression. We further show that TTP promoted eIF4E2 binding to target mRNA. These results imply that TTP recruits eIF4E2 to compete with eIF4E to repress the translation of target mRNA. This notion is supported by the finding that downregulation of endogenous eIF4E2 increased the production of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) protein without affecting the mRNA levels in THP-1 cells. Collectively, these results uncover a novel mechanism by which TTP represses target mRNA translation.     

General RNA‐binding proteins have a function in poly(A)‐binding protein‐dependent translation

The interaction between the poly(A)‐binding protein (PABP) and eukaryotic translational initiation factor 4G (eIF4G), which brings about circularization of the mRNA, stimulates translation. General RNA‐binding proteins affect translation, but their role in mRNA circularization has not been studied before. Here, we demonstrate that the major mRNA ribonucleoprotein YB‐1 has a pivotal function in the regulation of eIF4F activity by PABP. In cell extracts, the addition of YB‐1 exacerbated the inhibition of 80S ribosome initiation complex formation by PABP depletion. Rabbit reticulocyte lysate in which PABP weakly stimulates translation is rendered PABP‐dependent after the addition of YB‐1. In this system, eIF4E binding to the cap structure is inhibited by YB‐1 and stimulated by a nonspecific RNA. Significantly, adding PABP back to the depleted lysate stimulated eIF4E binding to the cap structure more potently if this binding had been downregulated by YB‐1. Conversely, adding nonspecific RNA abrogated PABP stimulation of eIF4E binding. These data strongly suggest that competition between YB‐1 and eIF4G for mRNA binding is required for efficient stimulation of eIF4F activity by PABP.     

Transgenic Brassica rapa plants over‐expressing eIF(iso)4E variants show broad‐spectrum Turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) resistance

The protein–protein interaction between VPg (viral protein genome‐linked) of potyviruses and eIF4E (eukaryotic initiation factor 4E) or eIF(iso)4E of their host plants is a critical step in determining viral virulence. In this study, we evaluated the approach of engineering broad‐spectrum resistance in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa) to Turnip mosaic virus (TuMV), which is one of the most important potyviruses, by a systematic knowledge‐based approach to interrupt the interaction between TuMV VPg and B. rapa eIF(iso)4E. The seven amino acids in the cap‐binding pocket of eIF(iso)4E were selected on the basis of other previous results and comparison of protein models of cap‐binding pockets, and mutated. Yeast two‐hybrid assay and co‐immunoprecipitation analysis demonstrated that W95L, K150L and W95L/K150E amino acid mutations of B. rapa eIF(iso)4E interrupted its interaction with TuMV VPg. All eIF(iso)4E mutants were able to complement an eIF4E‐knockout yeast strain, indicating that the mutated eIF(iso)4E proteins retained their function as a translational initiation factor. To determine whether these mutations could confer resistance, eIF(iso)4E W95L, W95L/K150E and eIF(iso)4E wild‐type were over‐expressed in a susceptible Chinese cabbage cultivar. Evaluation of the TuMV resistance of T₁ and T₂ transformants demonstrated that the over‐expression of the eIF(iso)4E mutant forms can confer resistance to multiple TuMV strains. These data demonstrate the utility of knowledge‐based approaches for the engineering of broad‐spectrum resistance in Chinese cabbage.     

A new translational regulator with homology to eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G.

Translation initiation in eukaryotes is facilitated by the cap structure, m7GpppN (where N is any nucleotide). Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) is a cap binding protein complex that consists of three subunits: eIF4A, eIF4E and eIF4G. eIF4G interacts directly with eIF4E and eIF4A. The binding site of eIF4E resides in the N-terminal third of eIF4G, while eIF4A and eIF3 binding sites are present in the C-terminal two-thirds. Here, we describe a new eukaryotic translational regulator (hereafter called p97) which exhibits 28% identity to the C-terminal two-thirds of eIF4G. p97 mRNA has no initiator AUG and translation starts exclusively at a GUG codon. The GUG-initiated open reading frame (907 amino acids) has no canonical eIF4E binding site. p97 binds to eIF4A and eIF3, but not to eIF4E. Transient transfection experiments show that p97 suppresses both cap-dependent and independent translation, while eIF4G supports both translation pathways. Furthermore, inducible expression of p97 reduces overall protein synthesis. These results suggest that p97 functions as a general repressor of translation by forming translationally inactive complexes that include eIF4A and eIF3, but exclude eIF4E.     

Participation of eIF4F complex in Junin virus infection: blockage of eIF4E does not impair virus replication

Translation efficiency of viral mRNAs is a key factor defining both cytopathogenicity and virulence of viruses, which are entirely dependent on the cellular translation machinery to synthesize their proteins. This dependence has led them to develop different translational reprogramming strategies to ensure viral mRNAs can effectively compete with cellular mRNAs. Junin virus (JUNV) is a member of the family Arenaviridae, whose mRNAs are capped but not polyadenylated. In this work we evaluated the relevance to JUNV replication of the main components of the eIF4F complex: eIF4A, eIF4GI and eIF4E. We found the viral nucleoprotein (N) of JUNV colocalized with eIF4A and eIF4GI but not with eIF4E. Moreover, N could be immunoprecipitated in association with eIF4A and eIF4GI but not with eIF4E. Accordingly, functional impairment of eIF4A as well as eIF4GI reduced JUNV multiplication. By contrast, inhibition of eIF4E did not show a significant effect on JUNV protein synthesis. A similar situation was observed for another two members of arenaviruses: Tacaribe (TCRV) and Pichinde (PICV) viruses. Finally, the nucleoproteins of JUNV, TCRV and PICV were able to interact with 7 methyl‐guanosine (cap), suggesting that the independence of JUNV multiplication on eIF4E, the cap‐binding protein, may be due to the replacement of this factor by N protein.     

A mutant of eukaryotic protein synthesis initiation factor eIF4E(K119A) has an increased binding affinity for both m7G cap analogues and eIF4G peptides

The eukaryotic multisubunit initiation factor eIF4F is an essential component of the translational machinery. Recognition of the cap structure of mRNA, m(7)GpppN, where N is any nucleotide, by eIF4E is required for initiation of translation. Here we compare the equilibrium and thermodynamic binding characteristics of wild-type eIF4E and a high-affinity mutant, eIF4E(K119A), with those of cap analogues and eIF4G peptides. The temperature-dependent K(d) values for cap analogues were markedly lower, indicating tighter binding, with the eIF4E(K119A) mutant compared with wild-type eIF4E. Although interactions with cap analogues were found to be enthalpically driven, entropic contributions were also significant. Moreover, the binding affinities of eIF4G peptides were 2-4-fold tighter for eIF4E(K119A) than for eIF4E(wt). These results demonstrate that the binding affinity for both the mRNA cap and eIF4G peptides can be simultaneously altered by point mutations distant from either binding site. Entropic contributions to binding suggesting hydrophobic interactions are larger in the mutant protein and are most likely due to a conformational change.     

Repression of cap-dependent translation by 4E-binding protein 1: competition with p220 for binding to eukaryotic initiation factor-4E.

An important aspect of the regulation of gene expression is the modulation of translation rates in response to growth factors, hormones and mitogens. Most of this control is at the level of translation initiation. Recent studies have implicated the MAP kinase pathway in the regulation of translation by insulin and growth factors. MAP kinase phosphorylates a repressor of translation initiation [4E-binding protein (BP) 1] that binds to the mRNA 5' cap binding protein eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)-4E and inhibits cap-dependent translation. Phosphorylation of the repressor decreases its affinity for eIF-4E, and thus relieves translational inhibition. eIF-4E forms a complex with two other polypeptides, eIF-4A and p220, that promote 40S ribosome binding to mRNA. Here, we have studied the mechanism by which 4E-BP1 inhibits translation. We show that 4E-BP1 inhibits 48S pre-initiation complex formation. Furthermore, we demonstrate that 4E-BP1 competes with p220 for binding to eIF-4E. Mutants of 4E-BP1 that are deficient in their binding to eIF-4E do not inhibit the interaction between p220 and eIF-4E, and do not repress translation. Thus, translational control by growth factors, insulin and mitogens is affected by changes in the relative affinities of 4E-BP1 and p220 for eIF-4E.     

Regulation of the translation initiation factor eIF4F by multiple mechanisms in human cytomegalovirus-infected cells

As a viral opportunistic pathogen associated with serious disease among the immunocompromised and congenital defects in newborns, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) must engage the translational machinery within its host cell to synthesize the viral proteins required for its productive growth. However, unlike many viruses, HCMV does not suppress the translation of host polypeptides. Here, we examine how HCMV regulates the cellular cap recognition complex eIF4F, a critical component of the cellular translation initiation apparatus that recruits the 40S ribosome to the 5' end of the mRNA. This study establishes that the cap binding protein eIF4E, together with the translational repressor 4E-BP1, are both phosphorylated early in the productive viral growth cycle and that the activity of the cellular eIF4E kinase, mnk, is critical for efficient viral replication. Furthermore, HCMV replication also induces an increase in the overall abundance of eIF4F components and promotes assembly of eIF4F complexes. Notably, increasing the abundance of select eIF4F core components and associated factors alters the ratio of active eIF4F complexes in relation to the 4E-BP1 translational repressor, illustrating a new strategy through which members of the herpesvirus family enhance eIF4F activity during their replicative cycle.     

Deciphering the mechanistic effects of eIF4E phosphorylation on mRNA‐cap recognition

The mRNA cap‐binding oncoprotein “eIF4E” is phosphorylated at residue S209 by Mnk kinases, and is closely associated with tumor development and progression. Despite being well‐established, mechanistic details at the molecular level of mRNA recognition by eIF4E due to phosphorylation have not been clearly elucidated. We investigated this through molecular modeling and simulations of the S209 phosphorylated derivative of eIF4E and explored the associated implication on the binding of the different variants of mRNA‐cap analogs. A key feature that emerges as a result of eIF4E phosphorylation is a salt‐bridge network between the phosphorylated S209 (pS209) and a specific pair of lysine residues (K159 and K162) within the cap‐binding interface on eIF4E. This interaction linkage stabilizes the otherwise dynamic C‐terminal region of the protein, resulting in the attenuation of the overall plasticity and accessibility of the binding pocket. The pS209‐K159 salt‐bridge also results in an energetically less favorable environment for the bound mRNA‐cap primarily due to electrostatic repulsion between the negative potentials from the phosphates in the cap and those appearing as a result of phosphorylation of S209. These observations collectively imply that the binding of the mRNA‐cap will be adversely affected in the phosphorylated derivative of eIF4E. We propose a mechanistic model highlighting the role of eIF4E phosphorylation as a regulatory tool in modulating eIF4E: mRNA‐cap recognition and its potential impact on translation initiation.     

Analysis of the interacting partners eIF4F and 3′‐CITE required for Melon necrotic spot virus cap‐independent translation

We have shown previously that the translation of Melon necrotic spot virus (MNSV, family Tombusviridae, genus Carmovirus) RNAs is controlled by a 3′‐cap‐independent translation enhancer (CITE), which is genetically and functionally dependent on the eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) 4E. Here, we describe structural and functional analyses of the MNSV‐Mα5 3′‐CITE and its translation initiation factor partner. We first mapped the minimal 3′‐CITE (Ma5TE) to a 45‐nucleotide sequence, which consists of a stem‐loop structure with two internal loops, similar to other I‐shaped 3′‐CITEs. UV crosslinking, followed by gel retardation assays, indicated that Ma5TE interacts in vitro with the complex formed by eIF4E + eIF4G_980–1159 (eIF4F_p20), but not with each subunit alone or with eIF4E + eIF4G_1003–1092, suggesting binding either through interaction with eIF4E following a conformational change induced by its binding to eIF4G_980–1159, or through a double interaction with eIF4E and eIF4G_980–1159. Critical residues for this interaction reside in an internal bulge of Ma5TE, so that their mutation abolished binding to eIF4E + eIF4G_1003–1092 and cap‐independent translation. We also developed an in vivo system to test the effect of mutations in eIF4E in Ma5TE‐driven cap‐independent translation, showing that conserved amino acids in a positively charged RNA‐binding motif around amino acid position 228, implicated in eIF4E–eIF4G binding or belonging to the cap‐recognition pocket, are essential for cap‐independent translation controlled by Ma5TE, and thus for the multiplication of MNSV.     

Identification of a C-terminal poly(A)-binding protein (PABP)-PABP interaction domain: role in cooperative binding to poly (A) and efficient cap distal translational repression

The poly(A)-binding protein (PABP), bound to the 3' poly(A) tail of eukaryotic mRNAs, plays critical roles in mRNA translation and stability. PABP autoregulates its synthesis by binding to a conserved A-rich sequence present in the 5'-untranslated region of PABP mRNA and repressing its translation. PABP is composed of two parts: the highly conserved N terminus, containing 4 RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) responsible for poly(A) and eIF4G binding; and the more variable C terminus, which includes the recently described PABC domain, and promotes intermolecular interaction between PABP molecules as well as cooperative binding to poly(A). Here we show that, in vitro, GST-PABP represses the translation of reporter mRNAs containing 20 or more A residues in their 5'-untranslated regions and remains effective as a repressor when an A61 tract is placed at different distances from the cap, up to 126 nucleotides. Deletion of the PABP C terminus, but not the PABC domain alone, significantly reduces its ability to inhibit translation when bound to sequences distal to the cap, but not to proximal ones. Moreover, cooperative binding by multiple PABP molecules to poly(A) requires the C terminus, but not the PABC domain. Further analysis using pull-down assays shows that the interaction between PABP molecules, mediated by the C terminus, does not require the PABC domain and is enhanced by the presence of RRM 4. In vivo, fusion proteins containing parts of the PABP C terminus fused to the viral coat protein MS2 have an enhanced ability to prevent the expression of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter mRNAs containing the MS2 binding site at distal distances from the cap. Altogether, our results identify a proline- and glutamine-rich linker located between the RRMs and the PABC domain as being strictly required for PABP/PABP interaction, cooperative binding to poly(A) and enhanced translational repression of reporter mRNAs in vitro and in vivo.     

Molecular dissection of the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) export‐competent RNP

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) controls gene expression through its effects on mRNA export and cap‐dependent translation, both of which contribute to its oncogenic potential. In contrast to its translation function, the mRNA export function of eIF4E is poorly understood. Using an RNP isolation/mass spectrometry approach, we identified candidate cofactors of eIF4E mRNA export including LRPPRC. This protein associates with mRNAs containing the eIF4E‐sensitivity element (4E‐SE), and its overexpression alters the nuclear export of several eIF4E‐sensitive mRNAs. LRPPRC‐mediated alteration of eIF4E's mRNA export function requires the integrity of its eIF4E‐binding site and it coincides with the subcellular re‐distribution of eIF4E. The eIF4E export RNP is distinct in composition from the bulk mRNA export pathway, in that eIF4E‐ and eIF4E‐sensitive mRNAs do not associate with general mRNA export factors such as TAP/NXF1 or REF/Aly. Our data indicate that mRNA export pathways have evolved for specific mRNAs enabling the differential regulation of biochemical pathways by modulating the expression of groups of genes at the level of their export.     

Sumoylation of eIF4E activates mRNA translation

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) is the cap‐binding protein that binds the 5′ cap structure of cellular messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Despite the obligatory role of eIF4E in cap‐dependent mRNA translation, how the translation activity of eIF4E is controlled remains largely undefined. Here, we report that mammalian eIF4E is regulated by SUMO1 (small ubiquitin‐related modifier 1) conjugation. eIF4E sumoylation promotes the formation of the active eIF4F translation initiation complex and induces the translation of a subset of proteins that are essential for cell proliferation and preventing apoptosis. Furthermore, disruption of eIF4E sumoylation inhibits eIF4E‐dependent protein translation and abrogates the oncogenic and antiapoptotic functions associated with eIF4E. These data indicate that sumoylation is a new fundamental regulatory mechanism of protein synthesis. Our findings suggest further that eIF4E sumoylation might be important in promoting human cancers.