Integrin trafficking regulated by Rab21 is necessary for cytokinesis

Adherent cells undergo remarkable changes in shape during cell division. However, the functional interplay between cell adhesion turnover and the mitotic machinery is poorly understood. The endo/exocytic trafficking of integrins is regulated by the small GTPase Rab21, which associates with several integrin alpha subunits. Here, we show that targeted trafficking of integrins to and from the cleavage furrow is required for successful cytokinesis, and that this is regulated by Rab21. Rab21 activity, integrin-Rab21 association, and integrin endocytosis are all necessary for normal cytokinesis, which becomes impaired when integrin-mediated adhesion at the cleavage furrow fails. We also describe a chromosomal deletion and loss of Rab21 gene expression in human cancer, which leads to the accumulation of multinucleate cells. Importantly, reintroduction of Rab21 rescued this phenotype. In conclusion, Rab21-regulated integrin trafficking is essential for normal cell division, and its defects may contribute to multinucleation and genomic instability, which are hallmarks of cancer.     

Intracellular nanovesicles mediate α5β1 integrin trafficking during cell migration

Membrane traffic is an important regulator of cell migration through the endocytosis and recycling of cell surface receptors such as integrin heterodimers. Intracellular nanovesicles (INVs) are transport vesicles that are involved in multiple membrane trafficking steps, including the recycling pathway. The only known marker for INVs is tumor protein D54 (TPD54/TPD52L2), a member of the TPD52-like protein family. Overexpression of TPD52-like family proteins in cancer has been linked to poor prognosis and an aggressive metastatic phenotype, which suggests cell migration may be altered under these conditions. Here, we show that TPD54 directly binds membrane and associates with INVs via a conserved positively charged motif in its C terminus. We describe how other TPD52-like proteins are also associated with INVs, and we document the Rab GTPase complement of all INVs. Depletion of TPD52-like proteins inhibits cell migration and invasion, while their overexpression boosts motility. We show that inhibition of migration is likely due to altered recycling of α5β1 integrins in INVs.     

Regulation of Integrin β1 Recycling to Lipid Rafts by Rab1a to Promote Cell Migration

Rab1a is a member of the Rab family of small GTPases with a well characterized function in the regulation of vesicle trafficking from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus and within Golgi compartments. The integrin family heterodimeric transmembrane proteins serve as major receptors for extracellular matrix proteins, which play essential roles in cell adhesion and migration. Although effects on intracellular trafficking of integrins or other key cargos by Rab1a could influence cell migration, the regulatory mechanisms linking Rab1a to cell migration are not well understood. Here, we report identification of Rab1a as a novel regulator of cell migration using an unbiased RNAi screen targeting GTPases. Inhibition of Rab1a reduced integrin-mediated cell adhesion and spreading on fibronectins, reduced integrin β1 localization to lipid rafts, and decreased recycling of integrin β1 to the plasma membrane. Analysis of Rab1a effector molecules showed that p115 mediated Rab1a regulation of integrin recycling and lipid raft localization in cell migration. Taken together, these results suggest a novel function for Rab1a in the regulation of cell migration through controlling integrin β1 recycling and localization to lipid rafts via a specific downstream effector pathway.     

Competitive binding of Rab21 and p120RasGAP to integrins regulates receptor traffic and migration

Integrin trafficking from and to the plasma membrane controls many aspects of cell behavior including cell motility, invasion, and cytokinesis. Recruitment of integrin cargo to the endocytic machinery is regulated by the small GTPase Rab21, but the detailed molecular mechanisms underlying integrin cargo recruitment are yet unknown. Here we identify an important role for p120RasGAP (RASA1) in the recycling of endocytosed α/β1-integrin heterodimers to the plasma membrane. Silencing of p120RasGAP attenuated integrin recycling and augmented cell motility. Mechanistically, p120RasGAP interacted with the cytoplasmic domain of integrin α-subunits via its GAP domain and competed with Rab21 for binding to endocytosed integrins. This in turn facilitated exit of the integrin from Rab21- and EEA1-positive endosomes to drive recycling. Our results assign an unexpected role for p120RasGAP in the regulation of integrin traffic in cancer cells and reveal a new concept of competitive binding of Rab GTPases and GAP proteins to receptors as a regulatory mechanism in trafficking.     

Endocytosis of beta1 integrins is an early event in migration promoted by the cell adhesion molecule L1

Directional cell motility is a complex process requiring orchestration of signals from diverse cell adhesion receptors for proper organization of neuronal groups in the brain. The L1 cell adhesion molecule potentiates integrin-dependent migration of neuronal cells and stimulates integrin endocytosis but its mechanism of action is unclear. The hypothesis was investigated that L1 stimulates cell motility by modulating surface levels of integrins through intracellular trafficking using a model cell system. Antibody-induced clustering of L1, which mimics ligand binding, induced formation of cell surface complexes of L1 and beta1 integrins in L1-expressing HEK293 cells. L1 formed cell surface complexes with integrin beta1 and alpha3 subunits but not with integrin alpha1. Following cell surface clustering, beta1 integrins and L1 became rapidly internalized into Rab5+ early endosomes. Internalization of L1 and beta1 integrins was prevented by treatment with monodansyl cadaverine (MDC), an inhibitor of clathrin-dependent endocytosis, and by deletion of the AP2/clathrin binding motif (RSLE) from the L1 cytoplasmic domain. MDC treatment coordinately inhibited L1-potentiated haptotactic migration of HEK293 cells to fibronectin in Transwell assays. These results suggested that downregulation of adhesive complexes of L1 and beta1 integrin at the plasma membrane by clathrin-mediated endocytosis is a potential mechanism for enhancing cell motility.     

Inhibition of SNARE-mediated membrane traffic impairs cell migration

Cell migration occurs as a highly-regulated cycle of cell polarization, membrane extension at the leading edge, adhesion, contraction of the cell body, and release from the extracellular matrix at the trailing edge. In this study, we investigated the involvement of SNARE-mediated membrane trafficking in cell migration. Using a dominant-negative form of the enzyme N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor as a general inhibitor of SNARE-mediated membrane traffic and tetanus toxin as a specific inhibitor of VAMP3/cellubrevin, we conducted transwell migration assays and determined that serum-induced migration of CHO-K1 cells is dependant upon SNARE function. Both VAMP3-mediated and VAMP3-independent traffic were involved in regulating this cell migration. Inhibition of SNARE-mediated membrane traffic led to a decrease in the protrusion of lamellipodia at the leading edge of migrating cells. Additionally, the reduction in cell migration resulting from the inhibition of SNARE function was accompanied by perturbation of a Rab11-containing alpha(5)beta(1) integrin compartment and a decrease in cell surface alpha(5)beta(1) without alteration to total cellular integrin levels. Together, these observations suggest that inhibition of SNARE-mediated traffic interferes with the intracellular distribution of integrins and with the membrane remodeling that contributes to lamellipodial extension during cell migration.     

Distinct Recycling of Active and Inactive β1 Integrins

Integrin trafficking plays an important role in cellular motility and cytokinesis. Integrins undergo constant endo/exocytic shuttling to facilitate the dynamic regulation of cell adhesion. Integrin activity toward the components of the extracellular matrix is regulated by the ability of these receptors to switch between active and inactive conformations. Several cellular signalling pathways have been described in the regulation of integrin traffic under different conditions. However, the interrelationship between integrin activity conformations and their endocytic fate have remained incompletely understood. Here, we have investigated the endocytic trafficking of active and inactive β1 integrins in cancer cells. Both conformers are endocytosed in a clathrin‐ and dynamin‐dependent manner. The net endocytosis rate of the active β1 integrins is higher, whereas endocytosis of the inactive β1 integrin is counteracted by rapid recycling back to the plasma membrane via an ARF 6‐ and early endosome antigen 1‐positive compartment in an Rab 4a‐ and actin‐dependent manner. Owing to these distinct trafficking routes, the two receptor pools display divergent subcellular localization. At steady state, the inactive β1 integrin is mainly on the plasma membrane, whereas the active receptor is predominantly intracellular. These data provide new insights into the endocytic traffic of integrins and imply the possibility of a previously unappreciated crosstalk between pathways regulating integrin activity and traffic.     

A functionally neutral single chain antibody to measure beta‐1 integrin uptake and recycling

Integrin‐mediated cell adhesion and signaling are critical for many physiological processes. The dynamic turnover of integrins and their associated adhesion complexes through endocytic and recycling pathways has emerged as an important mechanism for controlling cell migration and invasion in cancer. Thus, the regulation of integrin trafficking and how this may be altered by disease‐specific molecular mechanisms has generated considerable interest. However, current tools available to study integrin trafficking may cause artifacts and/or do not provide adequate kinetic information. Here, we report the generation of a functionally neutral and monovalent single chain antibody to quantitatively and qualitatively measure β1 integrin trafficking in cells. Our novel probe can be used in a variety of assays and allows for the biochemical characterization of rapid recycling of endogenous integrins. We also demonstrate its potential utility in live cell imaging, providing proof of principle to guide future integrin probe design.     

A Highlights from MBoC Selection: Rab5 Mediates Caspase-8–promoted Cell Motility and Metastasis

Caspase-8 is a key apical sensory protein that governs cell responses to environmental cues, alternatively promoting apoptosis, proliferation, and cell migration. The proteins responsible for integration of these pathways, however, have remained elusive. Here, we reveal that Rab5 regulates caspase-8–dependent signaling from integrins. Integrin ligation leads to Rab5 activation, association with integrins, and activation of Rac, in a caspase-8–dependent manner. Rab5 activation promotes colocalization and coprecipitation of integrins with caspase-8, concomitant with Rab5 recruitment to integrin-rich regions such as focal adhesions and membrane ruffles. Moreover, caspase-8 expression promotes Rab5-mediated internalization and the recycling of β1 integrins, increasing cell migration independently of caspase catalytic activity. Conversely, Rab5 knockdown prevented caspase-8–mediated integrin signaling for Rac activation, cell migration, and apoptotic signaling, respectively. Similarly, Rab5 was critical for caspase-8–driven cell migration in vivo, because knockdown of Rab5 compromised the ability of caspase-8 to promote metastasis under nonapoptotic conditions. These studies identify Rab5 as a key integrator of caspase-8–mediated signal transduction downstream of integrins, regulating cell survival and migration in vivo and in vitro.     

A Spatial Model for Integrin Clustering as a Result of Feedback between Integrin Activation and Integrin Binding

Integrins are transmembrane adhesion receptors that bind extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins and signal bidirectionally to regulate cell adhesion and migration. In many cell types, integrins cluster at cell-ECM contacts to create the foundation for adhesion complexes that transfer force between the cell and the ECM. Even though the temporal and spatial regulation of these integrin clusters is essential for cell migration, how cells regulate their formation is currently unknown. It has been shown that integrin cluster formation is independent of actin stress fiber formation, but requires active (high-affinity) integrins, phosphoinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), talin, and immobile ECM ligand. Based on these observations, we propose a minimal model for initial formation of integrin clusters, facilitated by localized activation and binding of integrins to ECM ligands as a result of biochemical feedback between integrin binding and integrin activation. By employing a diffusion-reaction framework for modeling these reactions, we show how spatial organization of bound integrins into clusters may be achieved by a local source of active integrins, namely protein complexes formed on the cytoplasmic tails of bound integrins. Further, we show how such a mechanism can turn small local increases in the concentration of active talin or active integrin into integrin clusters via positive feedback. Our results suggest that the formation of integrin clusters by the proposed mechanism depends on the relationships between production and diffusion of integrin-activating species, and that changes to the relative rates of these processes may affect the resulting properties of integrin clusters.     

Dynamic partitioning into lipid rafts controls the endo-exocytic cycle of the alphaL/beta2 integrin, LFA-1, during leukocyte chemotaxis

Cell migration entails the dynamic redistribution of adhesion receptors from the cell rear toward the cell front, where they form new protrusions and adhesions. This process may involve regulated endo-exocytosis of integrins. Here we show that in primary neutrophils unengaged alphaL/beta2 integrin (LFA-1) is internalized and rapidly recycled upon chemoattractant stimulation via a clathrin-independent, cholesterol-sensitive pathway involving dynamic partitioning into detergent-resistant membranes (DRM). Persistent DRM association is required for recycling of the internalized receptor because 1) >90% of endocytosed LFA-1 is associated with DRM, and a large fraction of the internalized receptor colocalizes intracellularly with markers of DRM and the recycling endocytic compartment; 2) a recycling-defective mutant (alphaL/beta2Y735A) dissociates rapidly from DRM upon being endocytosed and is subsequently diverted into a late endosomal pathway; and 3) a dominant negative Rab11 mutant (Rab11S25N) induces intracellular accumulation of endocytosed alphaL/beta2 and prevents its enrichment in chemoattractant-induced lamellipodia. Notably, chemokine-induced migration of neutrophils over immobilized ICAM-1 is abrogated by cholesterol-sequestering agents. We propose that DRM-associated endocytosis allows efficient retrieval of integrins, as they detach from their ligands, followed by polarized recycling to areas of the plasma membrane, such as lamellipodia, where they establish new adhesive interactions and promote outside-in signaling events.     

Structural and mechanical functions of integrins

Integrins are ubiquitously expressed cell surface receptors that play a critical role in regulating the interaction between a cell and its microenvironment to control cell fate. These molecules are regulated either via their expression on the cell surface or through a unique bidirectional signalling mechanism. However, integrins are just the tip of the adhesome iceberg, initiating the assembly of a large range of adaptor and signalling proteins that mediate the structural and signalling functions of integrin. In this review, we summarise the structure of integrins and mechanisms by which integrin activation is controlled. The different adhesion structures formed by integrins are discussed, as well as the mechanical and structural roles integrins play during cell migration. As the function of integrin signalling can be quite varied based on cell type and context, an in depth understanding of these processes will aid our understanding of aberrant adhesion and migration, which is often associated with human pathologies such as cancer.     

PKD1/PKCmu promotes alphavbeta3 integrin recycling and delivery to nascent focal adhesions

To identify kinases that regulate integrin recycling, we have immunoprecipitated alphavbeta3 integrin from NIH 3T3 fibroblasts in the presence and absence of primaquine (a drug that inhibits receptor recycling and leads to accumulation of integrins in endosomes) and screened for co-precipitating kinases. Primaquine strongly promoted association of alphavbeta3 integrin with PKD1, and fluorescence microscopy indicated that integrin and PKD1 associate at a vesicular compartment that is downstream of a Rab4-dependent transport step. PKD1 association was mediated by the C-terminal region of the beta3 integrin cytodomain, and mutants of beta3 that were unable to recruit PKD1 did not recycle in a PDGF-dependent fashion. Furthermore, suppression of endogenous PKD1 levels by RNAi, or overexpression of catalytically inactive PKD1 inhibited PDGF-dependent recycling of alphavbeta3 from early endosomes to the plasma membrane and blocked recruitment of alphavbeta3 to newly formed focal adhesions during cell spreading. These data indicate that PKD1 influences cell migration by directing vesicular transport of the alphavbeta3 integrin heterodimer.     

SNARE-mediated trafficking of alpha5beta1 integrin is required for spreading in CHO cells

In this study, the role of SNARE-mediated membrane traffic in regulating integrin localization was examined and the requirement for SNARE function in cellular spreading was quantitatively assessed. Membrane traffic was inhibited with the VAMP-specific catalytic light chain from tetanus toxin (TeTx-LC), a dominant-negative form (E329Q) of N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein (NSF), and brefeldin A (BfA). Inhibition of membrane traffic with either E329Q-NSF or TeTx-LC, but not BfA, significantly inhibited spreading of CHO cells on fibronectin. Spreading was rescued in TeTx-LC-expressing cells by co-transfection with a TeTx-resistant cellubrevin/VAMP3. E329Q-NSF, a general inhibitor of SNARE function, was a more potent inhibitor of cell spreading than TeTx-LC, suggesting that tetanus toxin-insensitive SNAREs contribute to adhesion. It was found that E329Q-NSF prevented trafficking of alpha5beta1 integrins from a central Rab11-containing compartment to sites of protrusion during cell adhesion, while TeTx-LC delayed this trafficking. These results are consistent with a model of cellular adhesion that implicates SNARE function as an important component of integrin trafficking during the process of cell spreading.     

The Rab4A effector protein Rabip4 is involved in migration of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts

The small GTP-binding protein Rab4 has been involved in the recycling of alphavbeta3 integrins in response to platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) stimulation suggesting a role for Rab4 in cell adhesion and migration. In this study, we explored the role of Rabip4 and Rabip4', two Rab4 effector proteins, in migration of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. In these cells, Rabip4 and Rabip4', collectively named Rabip4s, were partially co-localized with the early endosomal marker EEA1. PDGF treatment re-distributed endogenous Rabip4s toward the cell periphery where they colocalized with F-actin. In cells expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)-Rabip4 or GFP-Rabip4', constitutive appearance of GFP-Rabip4s at the cell periphery was accompanied by local increase in cortical F-actin in membrane ruffles at the leading edge. The expression of GFP-Rabip4 induced an increased migration compared with control cells expressing GFP alone, even in the absence of PDGF stimulation. On the contrary, in cells expressing a mutated form of Rabip4s unable to interact with Rab4, lack of typical leading edge was observed. Furthermore, PDGF treatment did not stimulate the migration of these cells. Furthermore, down-regulation of the expression of Rabip4s inhibited PDGF-stimulated cell migration. Endogenous Rabip4s were localized with alphav integrins at the leading edge following PDGF treatment, whereas in cells expressing GFP-Rabip4s, alphav integrins, together with GFP-Rabip4s, were constitutively localized at the leading edge. In contrast, reduction in Rabip4s expression levels using small interfering RNA was associated with impaired PDGF-induced translocation of alphav integrins toward the leading edge. Taken together, our data provide evidence that Rabip4s, possibly via their interaction with Rab4, regulate integrin trafficking and are involved in the migration of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts.     

Single cell tracking assay reveals an opposite effect of selective small non-peptidic α5β1 or αvβ3/β5 integrin antagonists in U87MG glioma cells

BackgroundIntegrins are extracellular matrix receptors involved in several pathologies. Despite homologies between the RGD-binding α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins, selective small antagonists for each heterodimer have been proposed. Herein, we evaluated the effects of such small antagonists in a cellular context, the U87MG cell line, which express both integrins. The aim of the study was to determine if fibronectin-binding integrin antagonists are able to impact on cell adhesion and migration in relationships with their defined affinity and selectivity for α5β1 and αvβ3/β5 purified integrins.MethodsSmall antagonists were either selective for α5β1 integrin, for αvβ3/β5 integrin or non-selective. U87MG cell adhesion was evaluated on fibronectin or vitronectin. Migration assays included wound healing recovery and single cell tracking experiments. U87MG cells stably manipulated for the expression of α5 integrin subunit were used to explore the impact of α5β1 integrin in the biological assays.ResultsU87MG cell adhesion on fibronectin or vitronectin was respectively dependent on α5β1 or αvβ3/β5 integrin. Wound healing migration was dependent on both integrins. However U87MG single cell migration was highly dependent on α5β1 integrin and was inhibited selectively by α5β1 integrin antagonists but increased by αvβ3/β5 integrin antagonists.ConclusionsWe provide a rationale for testing new integrin ligands in a cell-based assay to characterize more directly their potential inhibitory effects on integrin cellular functions.General significanceOur data highlight a single cell tracking assay as a powerful cell-based test which may help to characterize true functional integrin antagonists that block α5β1 integrin-dependent cell migration.     

A tale of three GTPases and a RIN in endothelial cell adhesion

Endothelial cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix regulates migration and outgrowth of blood vessels during angiogenesis. Cell adhesion is mediated by integrins, which transduce signals from the extracellular environment into the cell and, in turn, are regulated by intracellular signaling molecules. In a paper recently published in Cell Research, Sandri et al. show that RIN2 connects three GTPases, R-Ras, Rab5 and Rac1, to promote endothelial cell adhesion through the regulation of integrin internalization and Rac1 activation.The formation of the vascular tree during development requires the orderly growth of blood vessels to irrigate all organs and tissues. This process of blood vessel remodeling, termed angiogenesis, requires endothelial cell proliferation, adhesion, migration and tube formation¹. Pathological angiogenesis takes place during tumor growth as hypoxia within the tumor induces the release of pro-angiogenic mediators such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).Small GTPases are critical for the regulation of cell behavior and thus also play a central role in angiogenesis. Small GTPases are 20-25 kDa signaling proteins that cycle between an active GTP-bound and an inactive GDP-bound state. When active, GTPases associate with and activate diverse effector molecules that subsequently relay the signal to other molecules, ultimately leading to a specific cell response. Two classes of proteins facilitate GTPase cycling. Guanine exchange factors (GEFs) catalyze GDP unloading thereby promoting GTP binding and GTPase activation. Conversely, GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) enhance the intrinsic GTP hydrolysis activity of the GTPase leading to its inactivation. Small GTPases form a large superfamily with over 100 members in mammals. Based on structural and functional criteria, the GTPase superfamily is subdivided in Ras, Rab, Rho, Arf and Ran subfamilies, each of them generally, but not exclusively, specialized in the regulation of specific cellular events. For example, Rho GTPases primarily regulate cytoskeletal dynamics; Rab GTPases regulate intracellular membrane trafficking; and Ras GTPases function in the regulation of cell proliferation and survival. However, complex processes such as angiogenesis require the coordinated action of several GTPases. This is evidenced by the work of Sandri et al.² recently published in Cell Research. In their paper, Sandri et al. propose a mechanism for the regulation of endothelial cell adhesion and migration involving three GTPases belonging to different GTPase branches, R-Ras, Rab5 and Rac1. The protein RIN2 (Ras and Rab adaptor 2) brings together R-Ras and Rab5 to form a signaling module that orchestrates integrin trafficking and Rac1 activation, processes that are essential for cell adhesion and migration.Integrins are heterodimeric transmembrane extracellular matrix (ECM) receptors composed of one α and one β chain. In a process known as ''outside-in'' signaling, integrins transmit signals from the extracellular environment to intracellular adaptor and signaling molecules that regulate cell migration, survival and growth. Conversely, during ''inside-out'' signaling, integrins can be switched from an inactive to an active conformation by cytoplasmic signaling molecules leading to increased integrin affinity for the ECM.During 2D migration of adherent cells, nascent, highly dynamic focal contacts are formed at the leading edge lamellipodia where integrins mediate adhesion to the ECM. Some of these focal contacts disassemble and some mature into larger focal adhesions with a longer half-life. Failure in maintaining a dynamic assembly and disassembly of focal contacts will result in the inhibition of cell migration.Integrin-mediated adhesion can be regulated at different levels: (1) by changing integrin conformation and thus affinity for their ligand; (2) by modulating integrin avidity, i.e., by promoting integrin clustering on the plasma membrane; and (3) by changing the kinetics of integrin endocytosis and/or recycling³.The Ras GTPase R-Ras is primarily expressed in the vascular system (endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells)⁴. Zhang et al.⁵ were the first to show that R-Ras is a potent regulator of cell adhesion when they reported that expression of active R-Ras was enough to induce ECM adhesion of suspension cells, whereas dominant negative R-Ras reduced adhesion of the adherent cell line CHO. Although R-Ras was shown to enhance integrin affinity⁵, this effect was not consistently observed^6,7. These contradictory findings could be explained by the fact that R-Ras may activate integrins indirectly through antagonizing H-Ras-mediated integrin inhibition⁶.Recent findings suggest that R-Ras stimulates adhesion through the regulation of integrin internalization into Rab11-positive endosomes⁸. Now, the data of Sandri et al.² support this model. The authors addressed the question on how R-Ras regulates cell adhesion of endothelial cells by performing a yeast-two-hybrid screen using constitutively-active R-Ras as bait. The screen revealed that RIN2 is a major R-Ras-interacting protein. RIN proteins (RIN1, 2 and 3) are downstream effectors of Ras GTPases that function as GEFs for Rab5⁹, a GTPase that regulates endocytosis. RIN1 was shown to mediate the stimulation of EGF receptor-mediated endocytosis by H-Ras through the activation of Rab5¹⁰. Surprisingly, Sandri et al. found that R-Ras dramatically impaired the Rab5 exchange activity of RIN2, while H-Ras had no effect. However, RIN2 was still able to specifically bind active Rab5. These data suggest that active R-Ras, RIN2 and active Rab5 form a signaling complex. Accordingly, Sandri et al. show that endogenous R-Ras, RIN2 and Rab5 are indeed found in a complex in endothelial cells. While active R-Ras and RIN2 colocalize at nascent focal contacts and on intracellular vesicles, colocalization with Rab5 takes place on endosomes. The deletion of either the Ras- or the Rab5-binding domains of RIN2 prevented the colocalization of the trio. Thus, RIN2 appears to facilitate the transport of active R-Ras to Rab5-positive endosomes. What is the functional relevance of these interactions? Sandri et al. show that silencing of endogenous RIN2 impaired the increase in adhesion induced by active R-Ras and by Rab5. A similar effect was obtained upon expression of RIN2 deletion mutants lacking Ras- or Rab5-binding domains. These data strongly suggest that the adaptor function of RIN2 in connecting R-Ras and Rab5 regulates endothelial cell adhesion to the ECM. But what is the mechanism? Previous work has shown that the pro-adhesive activity of active R-Ras is linked to its ability to regulate β1 integrin endocytosis⁸. Sandri et al. confirm these data by showing that silencing of R-Ras or RIN2 decreases the rate of endocytosis of active ECM-engaged β1 integrins. In addition, the authors set a step further as they show that the signaling complex R-Ras/RIN2/Rab5 mediates basal Rac1 GTPase activation. Rac1 regulates actin dynamics and ruffle formation at the leading edge of migrating cells and its activity is essential for cell adhesion and migration. TIAM-1-mediated activation of Rac1 on endosomes and subsequent polarized transport to the plasma membrane has been proposed as a way to restrict Rac activity to sites of membrane protrusion^11,12. In line with this model, Sandri et al. show that active R-Ras and RIN2 colocalize with Rac1 on endosomes and that the endosomal Rac GEF TIAM-1 is necessary for R-Ras- and RIN2-induced cell adhesion.Altogether, the data of Sandri et al. support a model in which, integrin-activated R-Ras recruits RIN2 to focal adhesions and induces RIN2 conversion from a Rab5 GEF to a Rab5-docking protein. Subsequently, the complex promotes the endocytosis of ECM-engaged integrins and moves to early endosomes where R-Ras activates the TIAM-1/Rac1 pathway¹³. Active Rac1 translocates to the plasma membrane where it promotes actin polymerization and formation of new focal contacts (Figure 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Model proposed by Sandri et al.² for the regulation of focal adhesion dynamics by R-Ras. (1) R-Ras is activated by ECM-engaged integrins, recruits RIN2 and converts it from a Rab5 GEF to a Rab5 adaptor; (2) RIN2 binding to active Rab5 mediates the endocytosis of integrins and the transport of active R-Ras to endosomes; (3) R-Ras contributes to the activation of the Rac1 GEF TIAM-1, which then activates Rac1; (4) Active Rac1 translocates to the plasma membrane and promotes actin polymerization and formation of new focal contacts.By bridging active R-Ras and Rab5, RIN2 combines two processes essential for cell adhesion: (1) focal contact dynamics through the internalization of ECM-engaged integrins; and (2) local Rac1 activation to ensure actin polymerization at lamellipodia. Similarly, RIN2 also connects H-Ras and Rab5 in the internalization of the epithelial cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin¹⁴. Thus, RIN2 appears to be a universal effector of Ras-induced endocytosis of membrane receptors.Interestingly, the phenotype of a family with a homozygous mutation in RIN2 was recently described¹⁵. The affected individuals showed diverse abnormalities related to a defective connective tissue. Indeed, ultrastructural analysis of the skin showed an abnormal morphology of collagen fibrils. Collagen is a ligand for β1 integrins. Through simultaneous binding to collagen and to the intracellular cytoskeleton, integrins contribute to the assembly of the ECM by transmitting contraction forces from the cell to the ECM. It is tempting to speculate that the phenotype of the patients lacking RIN2 is due to a deficient β1 integrin function as found by Sandri et al. in their in vitro analysis. In addition, these patients bruise easily and present prolonged bleeding, which could be caused by deficient wound healing of blood vessels as a consequence of impaired R-Ras signaling.It should be noted, however, that R-Ras knockout mice have no major defects in vascular development but respond with increased angiogenesis to stress conditions such as tumor implantation⁴. On the contrary, the in vitro study by Sandri et al. suggests that R-Ras deficiency results in decreased endothelial cell migration. Further research is needed to clarify the role of R-Ras in angiogenesis. Likewise, it will be interesting to study vascular responses in RIN2-deficient mice in comparison to R-Ras knockout mice.     

The differential amino acid requirement within osteopontin in α4 and α9 integrin-mediated cell binding and migration

Osteopontin (OPN) contains at least two major integrin recognition domains, Arg159-Gly-Asp161 (RGD) and Ser162-Val-Val-Tyr-Gly-Leu-Arg168 (SVVYGLR), recognized by αvβ3 and α5β1 and α4 and α9 integrins, respectively. OPN is specifically cleaved by thrombin and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-3 or MMP-7 at a position of Arg168/Ser169 (R/S) and Gly166/Leu167 (G/L), respectively. We in this study examined the requirement of residues within SVVYGLR for the α4 and α9 integrin recognition and how MMP-cleavage influences the integrin recognition. The residues, Val164, Tyr165, and Leu167 are critical for α4 and α9 integrin recognition in both cell adhesion and cell migration. The residue Arg168 is additionally required for α9 integrin recognition in cell adhesion and this explains why α9 integrin binds to only thrombin cleaved form of OPN. α4 integrin is able to bind to SVVYG (MMP-cleaved form of RAA OPN-N half), while α9 integrin is not, supporting the above notion that Arg168 is additionally required for α9 integrin-mediated cell adhesion. The residue Val163 is important for α4, but not for α9 integrin recognition in cell migration. Importantly, we found that the replacement of Arg168 by Ala (R168A mutant) induces the augmentation of cell migration via α4 and α9 integrins.     

Macrophage stimulating protein-induced epithelial cell adhesion is mediated by a PI3-K-dependent, but FAK-independent mechanism

Macrophage stimulating protein (MSP) is a growth and motility factor that mediates its activity via the RON/STK receptor tyrosine kinase. MSP promotes integrin-dependent epithelial cell migration, which suggests that MSP may regulate integrin receptor functions. Integrins are cell surface receptors for extracellular matrix. Epithelial cell adhesion and motility are mediated by integrins. We studied the enhancement by MSP of cell adhesion and the molecular mechanisms mediating this effect. MSP decreased the time required for adhesion of 293 and RE7 epithelial cells to substrates coated with collagen or fibronectin. Prevention of adhesion by an RGD-containing peptide showed that the cell-substrate interaction was mediated by integrins. Wortmannin, an inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-K), blocked MSP-dependent adhesion, which shows that PI3-K is in the MSP-induced adhesion pathway. MSP also affected focal adhesion kinase (FAK) which is important for some types of cell adhesion and motility. Although MSP caused PI3-K-independent tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of FAK, experiments with dominant-negative FAK constructs showed that FAK does not mediate the effects of MSP on cell adhesion or motility. Thus PI3-K, but not FAK, mediates MSP-induced integrin-dependent adhesion of epithelial cells. Also, we found ligand-independent association between RON and beta1 integrin, which is additional evidence for a relationship between these two receptor systems.     

A role for caveolin and the urokinase receptor in integrin-mediated adhesion and signaling

The assembly of signaling molecules surrounding the integrin family of adhesion receptors remains poorly understood. Recently, the membrane protein caveolin was found in complexes with beta1 integrins. Caveolin binds cholesterol and several signaling molecules potentially linked to integrin function, e.g., Src family kinases, although caveolin has not been directly implicated in integrin-dependent adhesion. Here we report that depletion of caveolin by antisense methodology in kidney 293 cells disrupts the association of Src kinases with beta1 integrins resulting in loss of focal adhesion sites, ligand-induced focal adhesion kinase (FAK) phosphorylation, and adhesion. The nonintegrin urokinase receptor (uPAR) associates with and stabilizes beta1 integrin/caveolin complexes. Depletion of caveolin in uPAR-expressing 293 cells also disrupts uPAR/integrin complexes and uPAR-dependent adhesion. Further, beta1 integrin/caveolin complexes could be disassociated by uPAR-binding peptides in both uPAR-transfected 293 cells and human vascular smooth muscle cells. Disruption of complexes by peptides in intact smooth muscle cells blocks the association of Src family kinases with beta1 integrins and markedly impairs their migration on fibronectin. We conclude that ligand-induced signaling necessary for normal beta1 integrin function requires caveolin and is regulated by uPAR. Caveolin and uPAR may operate within adhesion sites to organize kinase-rich lipid domains in proximity to integrins, promoting efficient signal transduction.