Polyamines regulate their synthesis by inducing expression and blocking degradation of ODC antizyme

Polyamines are essential organic cations with multiple cellular functions. Their synthesis is controlled by a feedback regulation whose main target is ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), the rate-limiting enzyme in polyamine biosynthesis. In mammals, ODC has been shown to be inhibited and targeted for ubiquitin-independent degradation by ODC antizyme (AZ). The synthesis of mammalian AZ was reported to involve a polyamine-induced ribosomal frameshifting mechanism. High levels of polyamine therefore inhibit new synthesis of polyamines by inducing ODC degradation. We identified a previously unrecognized sequence in the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encoding an orthologue of mammalian AZ. We show that synthesis of yeast AZ (Oaz1) involves polyamine-regulated frameshifting as well. Degradation of yeast ODC by the proteasome depends on Oaz1. Using this novel model system for polyamine regulation, we discovered another level of its control. Oaz1 itself is subject to ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis by the proteasome. Degradation of Oaz1, however, is inhibited by polyamines. We propose a model, in which polyamines inhibit their ODC-mediated biosynthesis by two mechanisms, the control of Oaz1 synthesis and inhibition of its degradation.     

Mechanisms of degradation of the fungal ornithine decarboxylase

Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) is the first enzyme in polyamine biosynthesis in numerous living organisms, from bacteria to mammalian cells. Its control is under negative feedback regulation by the end products of the pathway. In dimorphic fungi, ODC activity and therefore polyamine concentrations are related to the morphogenetic process. From the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe to human, polyamines induce antizyme synthesis which in turn inactivates ODC. This is hydrolyzed by the 26S proteasome without ubiquitination. The regulatory mechanism of antizyme on polyamines is conserved, although to date no antizyme homology has been identified in some fungal species. The components that are responsible for regulating polyamine levels in cells and the current knowledge of ODC regulation in dimorphic fungi are presented in this review. ODC degradation is of particular interest because inhibitors of this pathway may lead to the discovery of novel antifungal drugs.     

Feedback control of ornithine decarboxylase expression by polyamines. Analysis of ornithine decarboxylase mRNA distribution in polysome profiles and of translation of this mRNA in vitro.

Cell growth and differentiation require the presence of optimal concentrations of polyamines. Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) catalyses the first and rate-controlling step in polyamine synthesis. In studies using cultures of Ehrlich ascites-tumour cells, we have shown that the expression of ODC is subject to feedback regulation by the polyamines. A decrease in the cellular polyamine concentration results in a compensatory increase in the synthesis of ODC, whereas an increase in polyamine concentration results in suppression of ODC synthesis. These changes in ODC synthesis were attributed to changes in the efficiency of ODC mRNA translation, because the steady-state amount of ODC mRNA remained constant. We now show that the number of ribosomes associated with ODC mRNA is low, and that the increase in ODC mRNA translation takes place without a shift in the distribution of ODC mRNA towards larger polysomes. This finding indicates that the polyamines regulate the efficiency of ODC mRNA translation by co-ordinately affecting the rates of initiation and elongation. By analysing ODC mRNA translation in vitro, using a rabbit reticulocyte lysate, polyadenylated RNA from a cell line with an amplified ODC gene, and a monospecific anti-ODC antibody, we also show that spermidine, but not putrescine, exerts a direct regulatory effect on ODC synthesis.     

On the translational control of ornithine decarboxylase expression by polyamines

Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC, EC 4.1.1.17) expression is subject to negative feedback regulation by the polyamines. The results of previous studies favor either translational or post-translational regulation. To facilitate further analysis of the mechanism by which polyamines affect ODC expression we have used a cell line (L1210-DFMOr) that overproduces ODC. This cell line was isolated by selection for resistance to the antiproliferative effect of the ODC inhibitor alpha-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO). These cells respond similarly to polyamine depletion and repletion as do their wild-type counterparts. When L1210-DFMOr cells were grown in the presence of 20 mM DFMO (i.e., when their polyamine content was reduced to an extent that still permitted a normal growth rate) ODC represented 4-5% of the soluble protein synthesized. After transfer of the cells to a medium lacking DFMO (i.e., when their polyamine pools were repleted), the rate of incorporation of [35S]methionine into ODC was one order of magnitude lower. Since this difference in incorporation of radioactivity into ODC remained the same irrespective of the pulse-label time used (between 2 and 20 min) it is likely to represent a true difference in ODC synthesis rate. Consequently, the pulse-label experiments cannot be explained by rapid degradation of the enzyme during the labeling period. The difference in ODC synthesis rate was not accompanied by a corresponding difference in the steady-state level of ODC mRNA. Analyses of the distribution of ODC mRNA in polysome profiles did not demonstrate any major difference between cells grown in the absence or presence of DFMO, even though the ODC synthesis rate differed by as much as 10-fold. However, the distribution of the ODC mRNA in the polysome profiles indicated that the message was poorly translated. Thus, most of the ODC mRNA was present in fractions containing ribosomal subunits or monosomes. Inhibition of elongation by cycloheximide treatment resulted in a shift of the ODC mRNA from the region of the gradient containing ribosomal subunits to that containing mono- and polysomes, indicating that most of the ODC mRNA was accessible to translation. Taken together these data lend support to a translational control mechanism which involves both initiation and elongation.     

Management of polyamine pools and the regulation of ornithine decarboxylase

The management of polyamine synthesis and polyamine pools differs fundamentally from that of most other small molecular-weight endproducts. The polyamines are vital to growth and important cellular functions, but they are toxic in excess. I argue here that their multivalent cationic character, leading to binding to cell constituents, precludes fluent feedback inhibition of synthesis. This has led to the development of elaborate alternative regulatory mechanisms controlling ornithine decarboxylase, the key initial enzyme of the pathway. Poorly regulated polyamine synthesis and the toxicity of polyamines impose upon cells a need to control uptake and to dispose of excess polyamines. Recent data on polyamine transport suggest unorthodox mechanisms of accomplishing these functions.     

Polyamine regulation of ornithine decarboxylase and its antizyme in intestinal epithelial cells

Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) is feedback regulated by polyamines. ODC antizyme mediates this process by forming a complex with ODC and enhancing its degradation. It has been reported that polyamines induce ODC antizyme and inhibit ODC activity. Since exogenous polyamines can be converted to each other after they are taken up into cells, we used an inhibitor of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase, diethylglyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone) (DEGBG), to block the synthesis of spermidine and spermine from putrescine and investigated the specific roles of individual polyamines in the regulation of ODC in intestinal epithelial crypt (IEC-6) cells. We found that putrescine, spermidine, and spermine inhibited ODC activity stimulated by serum to 85, 46, and 0% of control, respectively, in the presence of DEGBG. ODC activity increased in DEGBG-treated cells, despite high intracellular putrescine levels. Although exogenous spermidine and spermine reduced ODC activity of DEGBG-treated cells close to control levels, spermine was more effective than spermidine. Exogenous putrescine was much less effective in inducing antizyme than spermidine or spermine. High putrescine levels in DEGBG-treated cells did not induce ODC antizyme when intracellular spermidine and spermine levels were low. The decay of ODC activity and reduction of ODC protein levels were not accompanied by induction of antizyme in the presence of DEGBG. Our results indicate that spermine is the most, and putrescine the least, effective polyamine in regulating ODC activity, and upregulation of antizyme is not required for the degradation of ODC protein.     

The roles of polyamines in microorganisms

Polyamines are small polycations that are well conserved in all the living organisms except Archae, Methanobacteriales and Halobacteriales. The most common polyamines are putrescine, spermidine and spermine, which exist in varying concentrations in different organisms. They are involved in a variety of cellular processes such as gene expression, cell growth, survival, stress response and proliferation. Therefore, diverse regulatory pathways are evolved to ensure strict regulation of polyamine concentration in the cells. Polyamine levels are kept under strict control by biosynthetic pathways as well as cellular uptake driven by specific transporters. Reverse genetic studies in microorganisms showed that deletion of the genes in polyamine metabolic pathways or depletion of polyamines have negative effects on cell survival and proliferation. The protein products of these genes are also used as drug targets against pathogenic protozoa. These altogether confirm the significant roles of polyamines in the cells. This mini-review focuses on the differential concentrations of polyamines and their cellular functions in different microorganisms. This will provide an insight about the diverse evolution of polyamine metabolism and function based on the physiology and the ecological context of the microorganisms.     

A new perspective on ornithine decarboxylase regulation: prevention of polyamine toxicity is the overriding theme

The polyamines are essential cellular components for growth. Control of a key regulated enzyme of polyamine biosynthesis, ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), as a function of growth, is an area of intense interest. A unique regulatory property of ODC is the short half-life of the protein, which has been suggested to be an important factor in rapid activation of polyamine biosynthesis after cells are mitogenically stimulated. In this paper, it is argued that the biological significance of the short half-life of ODC is unrelated to the rate of its induction to a new steady state by growth factors, which is in fact limited by the relatively long half-life of the ODC mRNA. Instead, I suggest that the rapid turnover of ODC protein becomes of significance when cells cease growth and expeditious downregulation of the enzyme is important in preventing polyamine overproduction, which would result in cytotoxicity in the arrested cells. Although mitogenic activation of ODC expression has been studied extensively, there is very little known about the mechanisms controlling downregulation of polyamine biosynthesis during the arrest of animal cell growth. These considerations suggest that this would be a fertile area of future inquiry.     

Feedback regulation of polyamine synthesis in Ehrlich ascites tumor cells. Analysis using nonmetabolizable derivatives of putrescine and spermine

Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) is subject to feedback regulation by the polyamines. Thus, addition of putrescine, spermidine or spermine to cells causes inhibition of ODC mRNA translation. Putrescine and spermine are readily converted into spermidine. Therefore, it is conceivable that the inhibition of ODC synthesis observed in putrescine- and spermine-supplemented cells is instead an effect of spermidine. To examine this possibility we have used two analogs of putrescine and spermine, namely 1,4-dimethylputrescine and 5,8-dimethylspermine, which cannot be converted into spermidine. Both analogs were found to inhibit the incorporation of [35S]methionine into ODC protein to approximately the same extent, suggesting that putrescine as well as spermine exert a negative feedback control of ODC mRNA translation in the cell. In addition to suppressing ODC synthesis, both analogs were found to increase the turnover rate of the enzyme. 5,8-Dimethylspermine caused a marked decrease in the activity of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (AdoMetDC). This effect was not obtained with 1,4-dimethylputrescine, indicating that spermine, but not putrescine, exerts a negative control of AdoMetDC. Treatment with 1,4-dimethylputrescine caused extensive depletion of the cellular putrescine and spermidine content, but accumulation of spermine. 5,8-Dimethylspermine treatment, on the other hand, effectively depleted the spermine content and had less effect on the putrescine and spermidine content, at least initially. Nevertheless, the total polyamine content was more extensively reduced by treatment with 5,8-dimethylspermine than with 1,4-dimethylputrescine. Accordingly, only 5,8-dimethylspermine treatment exerted a significant inhibitory effect on Ehrlich ascites tumor cell growth.     

Feedback regulation of polyamine synthesis in Ehrlich ascites tumor cells. Analysis using nonmetabolizable derivatives of putrescine and spormine

Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) is subject to feedback regulation by the polyamines. Thus, addition of putrescine, spermidine or spermine to cells causes inhibition of ODC mRNA translation. Putrescine and spermine are readily converted into spermidine. Therefore, it is conceivable that the inhibition of ODC synthesis observed in putrescine- and spermine-supplemented cells is instead an effect of spermidine. To examine this possibility we have used two analogs of putrescine and spermine, namely 1,4-dimethylputrescine and 5,8-dimethylspermine, which cannot be converted into spermidine. Both analogs were found to inhibit the incorporation of [³⁵S]methionine into ODC protein to approximately the same extent, suggesting that putrescine as well as spermine exert a negative feedback control of ODC mRNA translation in the cell. In addition to suppressing ODC synthesis, both analogs were found to increase the turnover rate of the enzyme. 5,8-Dimethylspermine caused a marked decrease in the activity of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (AdoMetDC). This effect was not obtained with 1,4-dimethylputrescine, indicating that spermine, but not putrescien, exerts a negative control of AdoMetDC. Treatment with 1,4-dimethylputrescine caused extensive depletion of the cellular putrescine and spermidine content, but accumulation of spermine. 5,8-Dimethylspermine treatment, on the other hand, effectively depleted the spermine content and had less effect on the putrescine and spermidine content, at least initially. Nevertheless, the total polyamine content was more extensively reduced by treatment with 5,8-dimethylspermine than with 1,4-dimethylputrescine. Accordingly, only 5,8-dimethylspermine treatment exerted a significant inhibitory effect on Ehrlich ascites tumor cell growth.     

Induction of apoptotic cell death by putrescine

The polyamines are essential for cellular growth and differentiation. Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), which catalyses the first step in the biosynthesis of the polyamines, has a very fast turnover and is subject to a strong feedback control by the polyamines. In the present study, we show that overexpression of a metabolically stable ODC in CHO cells induced a massive cell death unless the cells were grown in the presence of the ODC inhibitor alpha-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO). Cells overexpressing wild-type (unstable) ODC, on the other hand, were not dependent on the presence of DFMO for their growth. The induction of cell death was correlated with a dramatic increase in cellular putrescine levels. Analysis using flow cytometry revealed perturbed cell cycle kinetics, with a large accumulation of cells with sub-G1 amounts of DNA, which is a typical sign of apoptosis. Another strong indication of apoptosis was the finding that one of the key enzymes in the apoptotic process, caspase-3, was induced when DFMO was omitted from the growth medium. Furthermore, inhibition of the caspase activity significantly reduced the recruitment of cells to the sub-G1 fraction. In conclusion, deregulation of polyamine homeostasis may negatively affect cell proliferation and eventually lead to cell death by apoptosis if putrescine levels become too high.     

Regulation of intestinal mucosal growth by amino acids

Amino acids, especially glutamine (GLN) have been known for many years to stimulate the growth of small intestinal mucosa. Polyamines are also required for optimal mucosal growth, and the inhibition of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), the first rate-limiting enzyme in polyamine synthesis, blocks growth. Certain amino acids, primarily asparagine (ASN) and GLN stimulate ODC activity in a solution of physiological salts. More importantly, their presence is also required before growth factors and hormones such as epidermal growth factor and insulin are able to increase ODC activity. ODC activity is inhibited by antizyme-1 (AZ) whose synthesis is stimulated by polyamines, thus, providing a negative feedback regulation of the enzyme. In the absence of amino acids mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) is inhibited, whereas, mTORC2 is stimulated leading to the inhibition of global protein synthesis but increasing the synthesis of AZ via a cap-independent mechanism. These data, therefore, explain why ASN or GLN is essential for the activation of ODC. Interestingly, in a number of papers, AZ has been shown to inhibit cell proliferation, stimulate apoptosis, or increase autophagy. Each of these activities results in decreased cellular growth. AZ binds to and accelerates the degradation of ODC and other proteins shown to regulate proliferation and cell death, such as Aurora-A, Cyclin D1, and Smad1. The correlation between the stimulation of ODC activity and the absence of AZ as influenced by amino acids is high. Not only do amino acids such as ASN and GLN stimulate ODC while inhibiting AZ synthesis, but also amino acids such as lysine, valine, and ornithine, which inhibit ODC activity, increase the synthesis of AZ. The question remaining to be answered is whether AZ inhibits growth directly or whether it acts by decreasing the availability of polyamines to the dividing cells. In either case, evidence strongly suggests that the regulation of AZ synthesis is the mechanism through which amino acids influence the growth of intestinal mucosa. This brief article reviews the experiments leading to the information presented above. We also present evidence from the literature that AZ acts directly to inhibit cell proliferation and increase the rate of apoptosis. Finally, we discuss future experiments that will determine the role of AZ in the regulation of intestinal mucosal growth by amino acids.     

Translational regulation of ornithine decarboxylase and other enzymes of the polyamine pathway

It has long been known that polyamines play an essential role in the proliferation of mammalian cells, and the polyamine biosynthetic pathway may provide an important target for the development of agents that inhibit carcinogenesis and tumor growth. The rate-limiting enzymes of the polyamine pathway, ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) and S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (AdoMetDC), are highly regulated in the cell, and much of this regulation occurs at the level of translation. Although the 5' leader sequences of ODC and AdoMetDC are both highly structured and contain small internal open reading frames (ORFs), the regulation of their translation appears to be quite different. The translational regulation of ODC is more dependent on secondary structure, and therefore responds to the intracellular availability of active eIF-4E, the cap-binding subunit of the eIF-4F complex, which mediates translation initiations. Cell-specific translation of AdoMetDC appears to be regulated exclusively through the internal ORF, which causes ribosome stalling that is independent of eIF-4E levels and decreases the efficiency with which the downstream ORF encoding AdoMetDC protein is translated. The translation of both ODC and AdoMetDC is negatively regulated by intracellular changes in the polyamines spermidine and spermine. Thus, when polyamine levels are low, the synthesis of both ODC and AdoMetDC is increased, and an increase in polyamine content causes a corresponding decrease in protein synthesis. However, an increase in active eIF-4E may allow for the synthesis of ODC even in the presence of polyamine levels that repress ODC translation in cells with lower levels of the initiation factor. In contrast, the amino acid sequence that is encoded by the upstream ORF is critical for polyamine regulation of AdoMetDC synthesis and polyamines may affect synthesis by interaction with the putative peptide, MAGDIS.     

Transgenic mouse models for studies of the role of polyamines in normal,hypertrophic and neoplastic growth

Transgenic mice expressing proteins altering polyamine levels in a tissue-specific manner have considerable promise for evaluation of the roles of polyamines in normal, hypertrophic and neoplastic growth. This short review summarizes the available transgenic models. Mice with large increases in ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase or antizyme, a protein regulating polyamine synthesis by reducing polyamine transport and ODC in the heart, have been produced using constructs in which the protein is expressed from the alpha -myosin heavy-chain promoter. These mice are useful in studies of the role of polyamines in hypertrophic growth. Expression from keratin promoters has been used to target increased synthesis of ODC, spermidine/spermine-N(1)-acetyltransferase (SSAT) and antizyme in the skin. Such expression of ODC leads to an increased sensitivity to chemical and UV carcinogenesis. Expression of antizyme inhibits carcinogenesis in skin and forestomach. Expression of SSAT increases the incidence of skin papillomas and their progression to carcinomas in response to a two-stage carcinogenesis protocol. These results establish the importance of polyamines in carcinogenesis and neoplastic growth and these transgenic mice will be valuable experimental tools to evaluate the importance of polyamines in mediating responses to oncogenes and studies of cancer chemoprevention.     

Glucocorticoids have opposite effects on ornithine decarboxylase and cell growth in pancreatic acinar AR42J cells.

This paper reviews the relationships between the effects of glucocorticoids on rat pancreatic acinar AR42J cell polyamine levels and cellular growth and differentiation. Glucocorticoids inhibit the growth of AR42J cells. Glucocorticoids either stimulate or inhibit the formation of polyamines in a variety of cell types. Cells require polyamines for normal growth. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that polyamines mediate the effects of glucocorticoids on AR42J cells. First, to confirm that AR42J cells required polyamines for growth we examined the effects of inhibiting ornithine decarboxylase (ODC). ODC is the most important and generally rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of the polyamines. As expected, the ODC inhibitor difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) inhibited AR42J cell DNA synthesis, and the addition of exogenous putrescine reversed this effect. The levels of growth inhibition by glucocorticoids and DFMO treatment were similar. Second, we examined the effects of glucocorticoids on ODC. Surprisingly, glucocorticoids increased levels of AR42J cell ODC mRNA, ODC activity, and putrescine. Glucocorticoids increased these parameters over a similar time-course as they decreased DNA synthesis. Analog specificity studies indicated that a glucocorticoid receptor mediated both the growth inhibitory and ODC stimulatory effects. Dose-response studies indicated, however, that growth inhibition was more sensitive to dexamethasone (DEX) than were ODC levels. Therefore, polyamines do not account for the effects of glucocorticoids on AR42J cell growth. In these cells, glucocorticoids have opposite and independent effects on ODC and growth.