The S4-S5 linker acts as a signal integrator for HERG K+ channel activation and deactivation gating

Human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG) K(+) channels have unusual gating kinetics. Characterised by slow activation/deactivation but rapid inactivation/recovery from inactivation, the unique gating kinetics underlie the central role hERG channels play in cardiac repolarisation. The slow activation and deactivation kinetics are regulated in part by the S4-S5 linker, which couples movement of the voltage sensor domain to opening of the activation gate at the distal end of the inner helix of the pore domain. It has also been suggested that cytosolic domains may interact with the S4-S5 linker to regulate activation and deactivation kinetics. Here, we show that the solution structure of a peptide corresponding to the S4-S5 linker of hERG contains an amphipathic helix. The effects of mutations at the majority of residues in the S4-S5 linker of hERG were consistent with the previously identified role in coupling voltage sensor movement to the activation gate. However, mutations to Ser543, Tyr545, Gly546 and Ala548 had more complex phenotypes indicating that these residues are involved in additional interactions. We propose a model in which the S4-S5 linker, in addition to coupling VSD movement to the activation gate, also contributes to interactions that stabilise the closed state and a separate set of interactions that stabilise the open state. The S4-S5 linker therefore acts as a signal integrator and plays a crucial role in the slow deactivation kinetics of the channel.     

Proline Scan of the hERG Channel S6 Helix Reveals the Location of the Intracellular Pore Gate

In Shaker-like channels, the activation gate is formed at the bundle crossing by the convergence of the inner S6 helices near a conserved proline-valine-proline motif, which introduces a kink that allows for electromechanical coupling with voltage sensor motions via the S4-S5 linker. Human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) channels lack the proline-valine-proline motif and the location of the intracellular pore gate and how it is coupled to S4 movement is less clear. Here, we show that proline substitutions within the S6 of hERG perturbed pore gate closure, trapping channels in the open state. Performing a proline scan of the inner S6 helix, from Ile⁶⁵⁵ to Tyr⁶⁶⁷ revealed that gate perturbation occurred with proximal (I655P-Q664P), but not distal (R665P-Y667P) substitutions, suggesting that Gln⁶⁶⁴ marks the position of the intracellular gate in hERG channels. Using voltage-clamp fluorimetry and gating current analysis, we demonstrate that proline substitutions trap the activation gate open by disrupting the coupling between the voltage-sensing unit and the pore of the channel. We characterize voltage sensor movement in one such trapped-open mutant channel and demonstrate the kinetics of what we interpret to be intrinsic hERG voltage sensor movement.     

The I182 region of k(ir)6.2 is closely associated with ligand binding in K(ATP) channel inhibition by ATP

The ATP-inhibited potassium (K(ATP)) channel is assembled from four inward rectifier potassium (K(ir)6.x) subunits and four sulfonylurea receptor (SURx) subunits. The inhibitory action of ATP is mediated by at least two distinct functional domains within the C-terminal cytoplasmic tail of K(ir)6.2. The G334D mutation of K(ir)6.2 virtually eliminates ATP-dependent gating with no effect on ligand-independent gating, suggesting a role in linkage of the site to the gate or in the ATP binding site, itself. The T171A mutation of K(ir)6.2 strongly disrupts both ATP-dependent and ligand-independent gating, suggesting a role for T171 in the gating step. A neighboring mutation, I182Q, virtually eliminates ATP inhibition, but its effect on ligand-independent gating remained unknown. We have now characterized both the K(i) values for inhibition by ATP and the ligand-independent gating kinetics of 15 substitutions at position 182. All substitutions decreased ATP-dependent inhibition gating as measured by the K(i), many profoundly so, yet had little or no effect on ligand-independent gating kinetics. Thus, substitutions at position 182 are unlikely to act by disrupting inhibition gate movement. Our results indicate an indispensable role for I182 in a step of the ATP binding mechanism, the linkage mechanism coupling the ATP binding site to the inhibition gate, or both.     

Proline Scan of the hERG Channel S6 Helix Reveals the Location of the Intracellular Pore Gate

In Shaker-like channels, the activation gate is formed at the bundle crossing by the convergence of the inner S6 helices near a conserved proline-valine-proline motif, which introduces a kink that allows for electromechanical coupling with voltage sensor motions via the S4-S5 linker. Human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) channels lack the proline-valine-proline motif and the location of the intracellular pore gate and how it is coupled to S4 movement is less clear. Here, we show that proline substitutions within the S6 of hERG perturbed pore gate closure, trapping channels in the open state. Performing a proline scan of the inner S6 helix, from Ile⁶⁵⁵ to Tyr⁶⁶⁷ revealed that gate perturbation occurred with proximal (I655P-Q664P), but not distal (R665P-Y667P) substitutions, suggesting that Gln⁶⁶⁴ marks the position of the intracellular gate in hERG channels. Using voltage-clamp fluorimetry and gating current analysis, we demonstrate that proline substitutions trap the activation gate open by disrupting the coupling between the voltage-sensing unit and the pore of the channel. We characterize voltage sensor movement in one such trapped-open mutant channel and demonstrate the kinetics of what we interpret to be intrinsic hERG voltage sensor movement.     

Removal of the outermost arginine in IVS4 segment of the Ca(V)3.1 channel affects amplitude but not voltage dependence of gating current

Positively charged amino acids in S4 segments of voltage-dependent Ca(V)3.1 channel form putative voltage sensor. Previously we have shown that exchange of uppermost positively charged arginine in IVS4 segment for cysteine (mutation R1717C) affected deactivation and inactivation, but not activation of macroscopic current. Now we compared gating currents from both channels. Maximal amplitude of charge movement in R1717C channel decreased but voltage-dependent characteristics of charge movement were not significantly altered. We concluded that mutation of R1717C affects the coupling between S4 activation and pore opening, but not the S4 activation itself.     

Tail end of the s6 segment: role in permeation in shaker potassium channels

The permeation pathway in voltage-gated potassium channels has narrow constrictions at both the extracellular and intracellular ends. These constrictions might limit the flux of cations from one side of the membrane to the other. The extracellular constriction is the selectivity filter, whereas the intracellular bundle crossing is proposed to act as the activation gate that opens in response to a depolarization. This four-helix bundle crossing is composed of S6 transmembrane segments, one contributed by each subunit. Here, we explore the cytoplasmic extension of the S6 transmembrane segment of Shaker potassium channels, just downstream from the bundle crossing. We substituted cysteine for each residue from N482 to T489 and determined the amplitudes of single channel currents and maximum open probability (P(o,max)) at depolarized voltages using nonstationary noise analysis. One mutant, F484C, significantly reduces P(o,max), whereas Y483C, F484C, and most notably Y485C, reduce single channel conductance (gamma). Mutations of residue Y485 have no effect on the Rb(+)/K(+) selectivity, suggesting a local effect on gamma rather than an allosteric effect on the selectivity filter. Y485 mutations also reduce pore block by tetrabutylammonium, apparently by increasing the energy barrier for blocker movement through the open activation gate. Replacing Rb(+) ions for K(+) ions reduces the amplitude of single channel currents and makes gamma insensitive to mutations of Y485. These results suggest that Rb(+) ions increase an extracellular energy barrier, presumably at the selectivity filter, thus making it rate limiting for flux of permeant ions. These results indicate that S6(T) residues have an influence on the conformation of the open activation gate, reflected in both the stability of the open state and the energy barriers it presents to ions.     

Slow photo-cross-linking kinetics of benzophenone-labeled voltage sensors of ion channels

Voltage-gated ion channels have voltage sensors that move in response to changes in membrane potential. This movement regulates the gates that control access of ions to the permeation pathway. To study the coupling between voltage sensors and gates, we immobilize the voltage sensors, using a bifunctional photo-cross-linking reagent that can be attached to an introduced cysteine, and observe the consequences for gate movement [Horn, R., Ding, S., and Gruber, H. J. (2000) J. Gen. Physiol. 116, 461-475]. UV irradiation of the benzophenone adduct attached to the cysteine residue immobilizes the voltage sensors, S4 segments, of both Na(+) and Shaker K(+) channels. Here we examine the kinetics of S4 immobilization after a brief UV flash. Immobilization has an exponential time course with time constants of >200 ms for Shaker and 17 ms for Na(+) channels, whereas the triplet excited state lifetime of the benzophenone adduct is <1 ms. This result suggests that H-atom abstraction by benzophenone is rapid and that the rate-limiting step in immobilization is the recombination of alkyl and ketyl free radicals generated by H-abstraction. H-Abstraction is also 2.7-fold more efficient at a hyperpolarized voltage than at a depolarized membrane potential in Shaker S4 segments. S4 immobilization after a UV flash can be prevented by depolarization of Shaker channels, suggesting that movement in the activation pathway is capable of separating the ketyl and alkyl free radicals. Exploiting the unique charge movement and gating properties of the L382V mutant of Shaker, we show that free radical separation follows S4 movement itself and is relatively independent of the movement of activation gates.     

Shaker potassium channel gating. II: Transitions in the activation pathway

Voltage-dependent gating behavior of Shaker potassium channels without N-type inactivation (ShB delta 6-46) expressed in Xenopus oocytes was studied. The voltage dependence of the steady-state open probability indicated that the activation process involves the movement of the equivalent of 12-16 electronic charges across the membrane. The sigmoidal kinetics of the activation process, which is maintained at depolarized voltages up to at least +100 mV indicate the presence of at least five sequential conformational changes before opening. The voltage dependence of the gating charge movement suggested that each elementary transition involves 3.5 electronic charges. The voltage dependence of the forward opening rate, as estimated by the single- channel first latency distribution, the final phase of the macroscopic ionic current activation, the ionic current reactivation and the ON gating current time course, showed movement of the equivalent of 0.3 to 0.5 electronic charges were associated with a large number of the activation transitions. The equivalent charge movement of 1.1 electronic charges was associated with the closing conformational change. The results were generally consistent with models involving a number of independent and identical transitions with a major exception that the first closing transition is slower than expected as indicated by tail current and OFF gating charge measurements.     

Voltage-sensing domain mode shift is coupled to the activation gate by the N-terminal tail of hERG channels

Human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) potassium channels exhibit unique gating kinetics characterized by unusually slow activation and deactivation. The N terminus of the channel, which contains an amphipathic helix and an unstructured tail, has been shown to be involved in regulation of this slow deactivation. However, the mechanism of how this occurs and the connection between voltage-sensing domain (VSD) return and closing of the gate are unclear. To examine this relationship, we have used voltage-clamp fluorometry to simultaneously measure VSD motion and gate closure in N-terminally truncated constructs. We report that mode shifting of the hERG VSD results in a corresponding shift in the voltage-dependent equilibrium of channel closing and that at negative potentials, coupling of the mode-shifted VSD to the gate defines the rate of channel closure. Deletion of the first 25 aa from the N terminus of hERG does not alter mode shifting of the VSD but uncouples the shift from closure of the cytoplasmic gate. Based on these observations, we propose the N-terminal tail as an adaptor that couples voltage sensor return to gate closure to define slow deactivation gating in hERG channels. Furthermore, because the mode shift occurs on a time scale relevant to the cardiac action potential, we suggest a physiological role for this phenomenon in maximizing current flow through hERG channels during repolarization.     

Gating charges in the activation and inactivation processes of the HERG channel

The hERG channel has a relatively slow activation process but an extremely fast and voltage-sensitive inactivation process. Direct measurement of hERG's gating current (Piper, D.R., A. Varghese, M.C. Sanguinetti, and M. Tristani-Firouzi. 2003. PNAS. 100:10534-10539) reveals two kinetic components of gating charge transfer that may originate from two channel domains. This study is designed to address three questions: (1) which of the six positive charges in hERG's major voltage sensor, S4, are responsible for gating charge transfer during activation, (2) whether a negative charge in the cytoplasmic half of S2 (D466) also contributes to gating charge transfer, and (3) whether S4 serves as the sole voltage sensor for hERG inactivation. We individually mutate S4's positive charges and D466 to cysteine, and examine (a) effects of mutations on the number of equivalent gating charges transferred during activation (z(a)) and inactivation (z(i)), and (b) sidedness and state dependence of accessibility of introduced cysteine side chains to a membrane-impermeable thiol-modifying reagent (MTSET). Neutralizing the outer three positive charges in S4 and D466 in S2 reduces z(a), and cysteine side chains introduced into these positions experience state-dependent changes in MTSET accessibility. On the other hand, neutralizing the inner three positive charges in S4 does not affect z(a). None of the charge mutations affect z(i). We propose that the scheme of gating charge transfer during hERG's activation process is similar to that described for the Shaker channel, although hERG has less gating charge in its S4 than in Shaker. Furthermore, channel domain other than S4 contributes to gating charge involved in hERG's inactivation process.     

Differential effects of paramyotonia congenita mutations F1473S and F1705I on sodium channel gating

We investigated effects of paramyotonia congenita mutations F1473S and F1705I on gating of skeletal muscle Na+ channels. We used on-cell recordings from Xenopus oocytes to compare fast inactivation and deactivation in wild type and mutant channels. Then, we used gating current recordings to determine how these actions of PC mutants might be reflected in their effects on charge movement and its immobilization. F1473S, but not F1705I, accelerated deactivation from the inactivated state and enhanced the remobilization of gating charge. F1473S and F1705I decreased the completion of closed-state fast inactivation, and each mutant decreased charge movement over the voltage range at which channels did not activate. An unexpected result was that F1705I increased the extent of charge immobilization in response to strong depolarization. Our results suggest that the DIV S4-S5 linker mutation F1473S promotes the hyperpolarized position of DIVS4 to accelerate recovery. Inhibition of charge movement by F1473S and F1705I in the absence of channel opening is discussed with respect to their effects on closed-state fast inactivation.     

Differential effects of paramyotonia congenita mutations F1473S and F1705I on sodium channel gating

We investigated effects of paramyotonia congenita mutations F1473S and F1705I on gating of skeletal muscle Na+ channels. We used on-cell recordings from Xenopus oocytes to compare fast inactivation and deactivation in wild-type and mutant channels. Then, we used gating current recordings to determine how these actions of PC mutants might be reflected in their effects on charge movement and its immobilization. F1473S, but not F1705I, accelerated deactivation from the inactivated state and enhanced the remobilization of gating charge. F1473S and F1705I decreased the completion of closed-state fast inactivation, and decreased charge movement over the voltage range at which channels did not activate. An unexpected result was that F1705I increased the extent of charge immobilization in response to strong depolarization. Our results suggest that the DIV S4-S5 linker mutation F1473S promotes the hyperpolarized position of DIVS4 to accelerate recovery. Inhibition of charge movement by F1473S and F1705I in the absence of channel opening is discussed with respect to their effects on closed-state fast inactivation.     

The cooperative voltage sensor motion that gates a potassium channel

The four arginine-rich S4 helices of a voltage-gated channel move outward through the membrane in response to depolarization, opening and closing gates to generate a transient ionic current. Coupling of voltage sensing to gating was originally thought to operate with the S4s moving independently from an inward/resting to an outward/activated conformation, so that when all four S4s are activated, the gates are driven to open or closed. However, S4 has also been found to influence the cooperative opening step (Smith-Maxwell et al., 1998a), suggesting a more complex mechanism of coupling. Using fluorescence to monitor structural rearrangements in a Shaker channel mutant, the ILT channel (Ledwell and Aldrich, 1999), that energetically isolates the steps of activation from the cooperative opening step, we find that opening is accompanied by a previously unknown and cooperative movement of S4. This gating motion of S4 appears to be coupled to the internal S6 gate and to two forms of slow inactivation. Our results suggest that S4 plays a direct role in gating. While large transmembrane rearrangements of S4 may be required to unlock the gating machinery, as proposed before, it appears to be the gating motion of S4 that drives the gates to open and close.     

Molecular action of lidocaine on the voltage sensors of sodium channels

Block of sodium ionic current by lidocaine is associated with alteration of the gating charge-voltage (Q-V) relationship characterized by a 38% reduction in maximal gating charge (Q(max)) and by the appearance of additional gating charge at negative test potentials. We investigated the molecular basis of the lidocaine-induced reduction in cardiac Na channel-gating charge by sequentially neutralizing basic residues in each of the voltage sensors (S4 segments) in the four domains of the human heart Na channel (hH1a). By determining the relative reduction in the Q(max) of each mutant channel modified by lidocaine we identified those S4 segments that contributed to a reduction in gating charge. No interaction of lidocaine was found with the voltage sensors in domains I or II. The largest inhibition of charge movement was found for the S4 of domain III consistent with lidocaine completely inhibiting its movement. Protection experiments with intracellular MTSET (a charged sulfhydryl reagent) in a Na channel with the fourth outermost arginine in the S4 of domain III mutated to a cysteine demonstrated that lidocaine stabilized the S4 in domain III in a depolarized configuration. Lidocaine also partially inhibited movement of the S4 in domain IV, but lidocaine's most dramatic effect was to alter the voltage-dependent charge movement of the S4 in domain IV such that it accounted for the appearance of additional gating charge at potentials near -100 mV. These findings suggest that lidocaine's actions on Na channel gating charge result from allosteric coupling of the binding site(s) of lidocaine to the voltage sensors formed by the S4 segments in domains III and IV.     

Enzyme domain affects the movement of the voltage sensor in ascidian and zebrafish voltage-sensing phosphatases

The ascidian voltage-sensing phosphatase (Ci-VSP) consists of the voltage sensor domain (VSD) and a cytoplasmic phosphatase region that has significant homology to the phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome TEN (PTEN).The phosphatase activity of Ci-VSP is modified by the conformational change of the VSD. In many proteins, two protein modules are bidirectionally coupled, but it is unknown whether the phosphatase domain could affect the movement of the VSD in VSP. We addressed this issue by whole-cell patch recording of gating currents from a teleost VSP (Dr-VSP) cloned from Danio rerio expressed in tsA201 cells. Replacement of a critical cysteine residue, in the phosphatase active center of Dr-VSP, by serine sharpened both ON- and OFF-gating currents. Similar changes were produced by treatment with phosphatase inhibitors, pervanadate and orthovanadate, that constitutively bind to cysteine in the active catalytic center of phosphatases. The distinct kinetics of gating currents dependent on enzyme activity were not because of altered phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate levels, because the kinetics of gating current did not change by depletion of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, as reported by coexpressed KCNQ2/3 channels. These results indicate that the movement of the VSD is influenced by the enzymatic state of the cytoplasmic domain, providing an important clue for understanding mechanisms of coupling between the VSD and its effector.     

Identification of a protein–protein interaction between KCNE1 and the activation gate machinery of KCNQ1

KCNQ1 channels assemble with KCNE1 transmembrane (TM) peptides to form voltage-gated K⁺ channel complexes with slow activation gate opening. The cytoplasmic C-terminal domain that abuts the KCNE1 TM segment has been implicated in regulating KCNQ1 gating, yet its interaction with KCNQ1 has not been described. Here, we identified a protein–protein interaction between the KCNE1 C-terminal domain and the KCNQ1 S6 activation gate and S4–S5 linker. Using cysteine cross-linking, we biochemically screened over 300 cysteine pairs in the KCNQ1–KCNE1 complex and identified three residues in KCNQ1 (H363C, P369C, and I257C) that formed disulfide bonds with cysteine residues in the KCNE1 C-terminal domain. Statistical analysis of cross-link efficiency showed that H363C preferentially reacted with KCNE1 residues H73C, S74C, and D76C, whereas P369C showed preference for only D76C. Electrophysiological investigation of the mutant K⁺ channel complexes revealed that the KCNQ1 residue, H363C, formed cross-links not only with KCNE1 subunits, but also with neighboring KCNQ1 subunits in the complex. Cross-link formation involving the H363C residue was state dependent, primarily occurring when the KCNQ1–KCNE1 complex was closed. Based on these biochemical and electrophysiological data, we generated a closed-state model of the KCNQ1–KCNE1 cytoplasmic region where these protein–protein interactions are poised to slow activation gate opening.     

Inactivation of the sodium channel. II. Gating current experiments

Gating current (Ig) has been studied in relation to inactivation of Na channels. No component of Ig has the time course of inactivation; apparently little or no charge movement is associated with this step. Inactivation nonetheless affects Ig by immobilizing about two-thirds of gating charge. Immobilization can be followed by measuring ON charge movement during a pulse and comparing it to OFF charge after the pulse. The OFF:ON ratio is near 1 for a pulse so short that no inactivation occurs, and the ratio drops to about one-third with a time course that parallels inactivation. Other correlations between inactivation and immobilization are that: (a) they have the same voltage dependence; (b) charge movement recovers with the time coures of recovery from inactivation. We interpret this to mean that the immobilized charge returns slowly to "off" position with the time course of recovery from inactivation, and that the small current generated is lost in base-line noise. At -150 mV recover is very rapid, and the immobilized charge forms a distinct slow component of current as it returns to off position. After destruction of inactivation by pronase, there is no immobilization of charge. A model is presented in which inactivation gains its voltage dependence by coupling to the activation gate.     

Voltage-dependent C-type inactivation in a constitutively open K+ channel

Most voltage-gated potassium (Kv) channels undergo C-type inactivation during sustained depolarization. The voltage dependence and other mechanistic aspects of this process are debated, and difficult to elucidate because of concomitant voltage-dependent activation. Here, we demonstrate that MinK-KCNQ1 (I_Ks) channels with an S6-domain mutation, F340W in KCNQ1, exhibit constitutive activation but voltage-dependent C-type inactivation. F340W-I_Ks inactivation was sensitive to extracellular cation concentration and species, and it altered ion selectivity, suggestive of pore constriction. The rate and extent of F340W-I_Ks inactivation and recovery from inactivation were voltage-dependent with physiologic intracellular ion concentrations, and in the absence or presence of external K⁺, with an estimated gating charge, z_i, of ∼1. Finally, double-mutant channels with a single S4 charge neutralization (R231A,F340W-I_Ks) exhibited constitutive C-type inactivation. The results suggest that F340W-I_Ks channels exhibit voltage-dependent C-type inactivation involving S4, without the necessity for voltage-dependent opening, allosteric coupling to voltage-dependent S6 transitions occurring during channel opening, or voltage-dependent changes in ion occupancy. The data also identify F340 as a critical hub for KCNQ1 gating processes and their modulation by MinK, and present a unique system for further mechanistic studies of the role of coupling of C-type inactivation to S4 movement, without contamination from voltage-dependent activation.     

Mutations in the S6 Gate Isolate a Late Step in the Activation Pathway and Reduce 4-AP Sensitivity in Shaker Kv Channel

K_v channels detect changes in the membrane potential via their voltage-sensing domains (VSDs) that control the status of the S6 bundle crossing (BC) gate. The movement of the VSDs results in a transfer of the S4 gating charges across the cell membrane but only the last 10–20% of the total gating charge movement is associated with BC gate opening, which involves cooperative transition(s) in the subunits. Substituting the proline residue P475 in the S6 of the Shaker channel by a glycine or alanine causes a considerable shift in the voltage-dependence of the cooperative transition(s) of BC gate opening, effectively isolating the late gating charge component from the other gating charge that originates from earlier VSD movements. Interestingly, both mutations also abolished Shaker’s sensitivity to 4-aminopyridine, which is a pharmacological tool to isolate the late gating charge component. The alanine substitution (that would promote a α-helical configuration compared to proline) resulted in the largest separation of both gating charge components; therefore, BC gate flexibility appears to be important for enabling the late cooperative step of channel opening.     

Mutations in the S6 Gate Isolate a Late Step in the Activation Pathway and Reduce 4-AP Sensitivity in Shaker Kv Channel

K_v channels detect changes in the membrane potential via their voltage-sensing domains (VSDs) that control the status of the S6 bundle crossing (BC) gate. The movement of the VSDs results in a transfer of the S4 gating charges across the cell membrane but only the last 10–20% of the total gating charge movement is associated with BC gate opening, which involves cooperative transition(s) in the subunits. Substituting the proline residue P475 in the S6 of the Shaker channel by a glycine or alanine causes a considerable shift in the voltage-dependence of the cooperative transition(s) of BC gate opening, effectively isolating the late gating charge component from the other gating charge that originates from earlier VSD movements. Interestingly, both mutations also abolished Shaker’s sensitivity to 4-aminopyridine, which is a pharmacological tool to isolate the late gating charge component. The alanine substitution (that would promote a α-helical configuration compared to proline) resulted in the largest separation of both gating charge components; therefore, BC gate flexibility appears to be important for enabling the late cooperative step of channel opening.