Inducers of immunogenic cancer cell death

Recently, cytokine-based pro-tumourigenic signalling has been found to play a major role in the immune system's pro-tumourigenic activity. On the other hand, other recent findings have shown that immunogenic cancer cell death triggered by certain anticancer modalities might reset the dysfunctional immune system towards the activation of a long-lasting protective anti-tumour response. Therefore, using inducers of immunogenic cell death (ICD) that can prevent or impede tumour-promoting cytokine signalling is one of the best ways of instigating or restoring efficient anti-tumour immunity. In this review it is discussed, how the different ICD inducers interact with the immune system and influence cytokine-based pro-tumourigenic signalling. We believe that it is crucial to discover or develop new anti-cancer therapeutic modalities that can induce ICD and impede tumour-promoting cytokine signalling.     

Molecular mechanisms of ATP secretion during immunogenic cell death

The immunogenic demise of cancer cells can be induced by various chemotherapeutics, such as anthracyclines and oxaliplatin, and provokes an immune response against tumor-associated antigens. Thus, immunogenic cell death (ICD)-inducing antineoplastic agents stimulate a tumor-specific immune response that determines the long-term success of therapy. The release of ATP from dying cells constitutes one of the three major hallmarks of ICD and occurs independently of the two others, namely, the pre-apoptotic exposure of calreticulin on the cell surface and the postmortem release of high-mobility group box 1 (HMBG1) into the extracellular space. Pre-mortem autophagy is known to be required for the ICD-associated secretion of ATP, implying that autophagy-deficient cancer cells fail to elicit therapy-relevant immune responses in vivo. However, the precise molecular mechanisms whereby ATP is actively secreted in the course of ICD remain elusive. Using a combination of pharmacological screens, silencing experiments and techniques to monitor the subcellular localization of ATP, we show here that, in response to ICD inducers, ATP redistributes from lysosomes to autolysosomes and is secreted by a mechanism that requires the lysosomal protein LAMP1, which translocates to the plasma membrane in a strictly caspase-dependent manner. The secretion of ATP additionally involves the caspase-dependent activation of Rho-associated, coiled-coil containing protein kinase 1 (ROCK1)-mediated, myosin II-dependent cellular blebbing, as well as the opening of pannexin 1 (PANX1) channels, which is also triggered by caspases. Of note, although autophagy and LAMP1 fail to influence PANX1 channel opening, PANX1 is required for the ICD-associated translocation of LAMP1 to the plasma membrane. Altogether, these findings suggest that caspase- and PANX1-dependent lysosomal exocytosis has an essential role in ATP release as triggered by immunogenic chemotherapy.     

Reinforcing the immunogenic cell death to enhance cancer immunotherapy efficacy

Immunogenic cell death (ICD) has been a revolutionary modality in cancer treatment since it kills primary tumors and prevents recurrent malignancy simultaneously. ICD represents a particular form of cancer cell death accompanied by production of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that can be recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which enhances infiltration of effector T cells and potentiates antitumor immune responses. Various treatment methods can elicit ICD involving chemo- and radio-therapy, phototherapy and nanotechnology to efficiently convert dead cancer cells into vaccines and trigger the antigen-specific immune responses. Nevertheless, the efficacy of ICD-induced therapies is restrained due to low accumulation in the tumor sites and damage of normal tissues. Thus, researchers have been devoted to overcoming these problems with novel materials and strategies. In this review, current knowledge on different ICD modalities, various ICD inducers, development and application of novel ICD-inducing strategies are summarized. Moreover, the prospects and challenges are briefly outlined to provide reference for future design of novel immunotherapy based on ICD effect.     

Viral subversion of immunogenic cell death

While physiological cell death is non-immunogenic, pathogen induced cell death can be immunogenic and hence stimulate an immune response against antigens that derive from dying cells and are presented by dendritic cells (DCs). The obligate immunogenic “eat-me” signal generated by dying cells consists in the exposure of calreticulin (CRT) at the cell surface. This particular “eat-me” signal, which facilitates engulfment by DCs, can only be found on cells that succumb to immunogenic apoptosis, while it is not present on cells dying in an immunologically silent fashion. CRT normally resides in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), yet can translocate to the plasma membrane surface through a complex pathway that involves elements of the ER stress response (e.g., the eIF2α-phosphorylating kinase PERK), the apoptotic machinery (e.g., caspase-8 and its substrate BAP31, Bax, Bak), the anterograde transport from the ER to the Golgi apparatus, and SNARE-dependent exocytosis. A large panoply of viruses encodes proteins that inhibit eIF2α kinases, catalyze the dephosphorylation of eIF2α, bind to caspase-8, Bap31, Bax or Bak, or perturb exocytosis. We therefore postulate that obligate intracellular pathogens have developed a variety of strategies to subvert CRT exposure, thereby avoiding immunogenic cell death.     

Enlightening the impact of immunogenic cell death in photodynamic cancer therapy

EMBO J 31 5, 1062–1079 (2012); published online January172012In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Garg et al (2012) delineate a signalling pathway that leads to calreticulin (CRT) exposure and ATP release by cancer cells that succumb to photodynamic therapy (PTD), thereby providing fresh insights into the molecular regulation of immunogenic cell death (ICD).The textbook notion that apoptosis would always take place unrecognized by the immune system has recently been invalidated (Zitvogel et al, 2010; Galluzzi et al, 2012). Thus, in specific circumstances (in particular in response to anthracyclines, oxaliplatin, and γ irradiation), cancer cells can enter a lethal stress pathway linked to the emission of a spatiotemporally defined combination of signals that is decoded by the immune system to activate tumour-specific immune responses (Zitvogel et al, 2010). These signals include the pre-apoptotic exposure of intracellular proteins such as the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperon CRT and the heat-shock protein HSP90 at the cell surface, the pre-apoptotic secretion of ATP, and the post-apoptotic release of the nuclear protein HMGB1 (Zitvogel et al, 2010). Together, these processes (and perhaps others) constitute the molecular determinants of ICD.In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Garg et al (2012) add hypericin-based PTD (Hyp-PTD) to the list of bona fide ICD inducers and convincingly link Hyp-PTD-elicited ICD to the functional activation of the immune system. Moreover, Garg et al (2012) demonstrate that Hyp-PDT stimulates ICD via signalling pathways that overlap with—but are not identical to—those elicited by anthracyclines, which constitute the first ICD inducers to be characterized (Casares et al, 2005; Zappasodi et al, 2010; Fucikova et al, 2011).Intrigued by the fact that the ER stress response is required for anthracycline-induced ICD (Panaretakis et al, 2009), Garg et al (2012) decided to investigate the immunogenicity of Hyp-PDT (which selectively targets the ER). Hyp-PDT potently stimulated CRT exposure and ATP release in human bladder carcinoma T24 cells. As a result, T24 cells exposed to Hyp-PDT (but not untreated cells) were engulfed by Mf4/4 macrophages and human dendritic cells (DCs), the most important antigen-presenting cells in antitumour immunity. Similarly, murine colon carcinoma CT26 cells succumbing to Hyp-PDT (but not cells dying in response to the unspecific ER stressor tunicamycin) were preferentially phagocytosed by murine JAWSII DCs, and efficiently immunized syngenic BALB/c mice against a subsequent challenge with living cells of the same type. Of note, contrarily to T24 cells treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or dying from accidental necrosis, T24 cells exposed to Hyp-PDT activated DCs while eliciting a peculiar functional profile, featuring high levels of NO production and absent secretion of immunosuppressive interleukin-10 (IL-10) (Garg et al, 2012). Moreover upon co-culture with Hyp-PDT-treated T24 cells, human DCs were found to secrete high levels of IL-1β, a cytokine that is required for the adequate polarization of interferon γ (IFNγ)-producing antineoplastic CD8⁺ T cells (Aymeric et al, 2010). Taken together, these data demonstrate that Hyp-PDT induces bona fide ICD, eliciting an antitumour immune response.By combining pharmacological and genetic approaches, Garg et al (2012) then investigated the molecular cascades that are required for Hyp-PDT-induced CRT exposure and ATP release. They found that CRT exposure triggered by Hyp-PDT requires reactive oxygen species (as demonstrated with the ¹O₂ quencher L-histidine), class I phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) activity (as shown with the chemical inhibitor wortmannin and the RNAi-mediated depletion of the catalytic PI3K subunit p110), the actin cytoskeleton (as proven with the actin inhibitor latrunculin B), the ER-to-Golgi anterograde transport (as shown using brefeldin A), the ER stress-associated kinase PERK, the pro-apoptotic molecules BAX and BAK as well as the CRT cell surface receptor CD91 (as demonstrated by their knockout or RNAi-mediated depletion). However, there were differences in the signalling pathways leading to CRT exposure in response to anthracyclines (Panaretakis et al, 2009) and Hyp-PDT (Garg et al, 2012). In contrast to the former, the latter was not accompanied by the exposure of the ER chaperon ERp57, and did not require eIF2α phosphorylation (as shown with non-phosphorylatable eIF2α mutants), caspase-8 activity (as shown with the pan-caspase blocker Z-VAD.fmk, upon overexpression of the viral caspase inhibitor CrmA and following the RNAi-mediated depletion of caspase-8), and increased cytosolic Ca²⁺ concentrations (as proven with cytosolic Ca²⁺ chelators and overexpression of the ER Ca²⁺ pump SERCA). Moreover, Hyp-PDT induced the translocation of CRT at the cell surface irrespective of retrograde transport (as demonstrated with the microtubular poison nocodazole) and lipid rafts (as demonstrated with the cholesterol-depleting agent methyl-β-cyclodextrine). Of note, ATP secretion in response to Hyp-PDT depended on the ER-to-Golgi anterograde transport, PI3K and PERK activity (presumably due to their role in the regulation of secretory pathways), but did not require BAX and BAK (Garg et al, 2012). Since PERK can stimulate autophagy in the context of ER stress (Kroemer et al, 2010), it is tempting to speculate that autophagy is involved in Hyp-PDT-elicited ATP secretion, as this appears to be to the case during anthracycline-induced ICD (Michaud et al, 2011).Altogether, the intriguing report by Garg et al (2012) demonstrates that the stress signalling pathways leading to ICD depend—at least in part—on the initiating stimulus (Figure 1). Speculatively, this points to the coexistence of a ‘core'' ICD signalling pathway (which would be common to several, if not all, ICD inducers) with ‘private'' molecular cascades (which would be activated in a stimulus-dependent fashion). Irrespective of these details, the work by Garg et al (2012) further underscores the importance of anticancer immune responses elicited by established and experimental therapies.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Molecular mechanisms of immunogenic cell death (ICD). At least three processes underlie the immunogenicity of cell death: the pre-apoptotic exposure of calreticulin (CRT) at the cell surface, the secretion of ATP, and the post-apoptotic release of HMGB1. ICD can be triggered by multiple stimuli, including photodynamic therapy, anthracycline-based chemotherapy, and some types of radiotherapy. The signalling pathways elicited by distinct ICD inducers overlap, but are not identical. In red are indicated molecules and processes that—according to current knowledge—may be required for CRT exposure and ATP secretion in response to most, if not all, ICD inducers. The molecular determinants of the immunogenic release of HMGB1 remain poorly understood. ER, endoplasmic reticulum; P-eIF2α, phosphorylated eIF2α; PI3K, class I phosphoinositide-3-kinase; ROS, reactive oxygen species.     

Multimodal immunogenic cancer cell death as a consequence of anticancer cytotoxic treatments

Apoptotic cell death generally characterized by a morphologically homogenous entity has been considered to be essentially non-immunogenic. However, apoptotic cancer cell death, also known as type 1 programmed cell death (PCD), was recently found to be immunogenic after treatment with several chemotherapeutic agents and oncolytic viruses through the emission of various danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Extensive studies have revealed that two different types of immunogenic cell death (ICD) inducers, recently classified by their distinct actions in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, can reinitiate immune responses suppressed by the tumor microenvironment. Indeed, recent clinical studies have shown that several immunotherapeutic modalities including therapeutic cancer vaccines and oncolytic viruses, but not conventional chemotherapies, culminate in beneficial outcomes, probably because of their different mechanisms of ICD induction. Furthermore, interests in PCD of cancer cells have shifted from its classical form to novel forms involving autophagic cell death (ACD), programmed necrotic cell death (necroptosis), and pyroptosis, some of which entail immunogenicity after anticancer treatments. In this review, we provide a brief outline of the well-characterized DAMPs such as calreticulin (CRT) exposure, high-mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1), and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) release, which are induced by the morphologically distinct types of cell death. In the latter part, our review focuses on how emerging oncolytic viruses induce different forms of cell death and the combinations of oncolytic virotherapies with further immunomodulation by cyclophosphamide and other immunotherapeutic modalities foster dendritic cell (DC)-mediated induction of antitumor immunity. Accordingly, it is increasingly important to fully understand how and which ICD inducers cause multimodal ICD, which should aid the design of reasonably multifaceted anticancer modalities to maximize ICD-triggered antitumor immunity and eliminate residual or metastasized tumors while sparing autoimmune diseases.     

The intrinsic immunogenic properties of cancer cell lines,immunogenic cell death,and how these influence host antitumor immune responses

Modern cancer therapies often involve the combination of tumor-directed cytotoxic strategies and generation of a host antitumor immune response. The latter is unleashed by immunotherapies that activate the immune system generating a more immunostimulatory tumor microenvironment and a stronger tumor antigen-specific immune response. Studying the interaction between antitumor cytotoxic therapies, dying cancer cells, and the innate and adaptive immune system requires appropriate experimental tumor models in mice. In this review, we discuss the immunostimulatory and immunosuppressive properties of cancer cell lines commonly used in immunogenic cell death (ICD) studies being apoptosis or necroptosis. We will especially focus on the antigenic component of immunogenicity. While in several cancer cell lines the epitopes of endogenously expressed tumor antigens are known, these intrinsic epitopes are rarely determined in experimental apoptotic or necroptotic ICD settings. Instead by far the most ICD research studies investigate the antigenic response against exogenously expressed model antigens such as ovalbumin or retroviral epitopes (e.g., AH1). In this review, we will argue that the immune response against endogenous tumor antigens and the immunopeptidome profile of cancer cell lines affect the eventual biological readouts in the typical prophylactic tumor vaccination type of experiments used in ICD research, and we will propose additional methods involving immunopeptidome profiling, major histocompatibility complex molecule expression, and identification of tumor-infiltrating immune cells to document intrinsic immunogenicity following different cell death modalities.Subject terms: Cancer models, Antigen-presenting cells, Immune cell death     

Crosstalk between ER stress and immunogenic cell death

Preclinical and clinical findings suggest that tumor-specific immune responses may be responsible – at least in part – for the clinical success of therapeutic regimens that rely on immunogenic cell death (ICD) inducers, including anthracyclines and oxaliplatin. The molecular pathways whereby some, but not all, cytotoxic agents promote bona fide ICD remain to be fully elucidated. Nevertheless, a central role for the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response has been revealed in all scenarios of ICD described thus far. Hence, components of the ER stress machinery may constitute clinically relevant druggable targets for the induction of ICD. In this review, we will summarize recent findings in the field of ICD research with a special focus on ER stress mechanisms and their implication for cancer therapy.     

ROS-induced autophagy in cancer cells assists in evasion from determinants of immunogenic cell death

Calreticulin surface exposure (ecto-CALR), ATP secretion, maturation of dendritic cells (DCs) and stimulation of T cells are prerequisites for anticancer therapy-induced immunogenic cell death (ICD). Recent evidence suggests that chemotherapy-induced autophagy may positively regulate ICD by favoring ATP secretion. We have recently shown that reactive oxygen species (ROS)-based endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress triggered by hypericin-mediated photodynamic therapy (Hyp-PDT) induces bona fide ICD. However, whether Hyp-PDT-induced autophagy regulates ICD was not explored. Here we showed that, in contrast to expectations, reducing autophagy (by ATG5 knockdown) in cancer cells did not alter ATP secretion after Hyp-PDT. Autophagy-attenuated cancer cells displayed enhanced ecto-CALR induction following Hyp-PDT, which strongly correlated with their inability to clear oxidatively damaged proteins. Furthermore, autophagy-attenuation in Hyp-PDT-treated cancer cells increased their ability to induce DC maturation, IL6 production and proliferation of CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ T cells, which was accompanied by IFNG production. Thus, our study unravels a role for ROS-induced autophagy in weakening functional interaction between dying cancer cells and the immune system thereby helping in evasion from ICD prerequisites or determinants.     

Shikonin induces immunogenic cell death in tumor cells and enhances dendritic cell-based cancer vaccine

Immunogenic cell death is characterized by damage-associated molecular patterns, which can enhance the maturation and antigen uptake of dendritic cells. Shikonin, an anti-inflammatory and antitumor phytochemical, was exploited here as an adjuvant for dendritic cell-based cancer vaccines via induction of immunogenic cell death. Shikonin can effectively activate both receptor- and mitochondria-mediated apoptosis and increase the expression of all five tested damage-associated molecular patterns in the resultant tumor cell lysates. The combination treatment with damage-associated molecular patterns and LPS activates dendritic cells to a high maturation status and enhances the priming of Th1/Th17 effector cells. Shikonin-tumor cell lysate-loaded mature dendritic cells exhibit a high level of CD86 and MHC class II and activate Th1 cells. The shikonin-tumor cell lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccines result in a strong induction of cytotoxic activity of splenocytes against target tumor cells, a retardation in tumor growth, and an increase in the survival of test mice. The much enhanced immunogenicity and efficacy of the current cancer vaccine formulation, that is, the use of shikonin-treated tumor cells as cell lysates for the pulse of dendritic cells in culture, may suggest a new ex vivo approach for developing individualized, dendritic cells-based anticancer vaccines.     

A novel pathway combining calreticulin exposure and ATP secretion in immunogenic cancer cell death

Surface-exposed calreticulin (ecto-CRT) and secreted ATP are crucial damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) for immunogenic apoptosis. Inducers of immunogenic apoptosis rely on an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-based (reactive oxygen species (ROS)-regulated) pathway for ecto-CRT induction, but the ATP secretion pathway is unknown. We found that after photodynamic therapy (PDT), which generates ROS-mediated ER stress, dying cancer cells undergo immunogenic apoptosis characterized by phenotypic maturation (CD80(high), CD83(high), CD86(high), MHC-II(high)) and functional stimulation (NO(high), IL-10(absent), IL-1β(high)) of dendritic cells as well as induction of a protective antitumour immune response. Intriguingly, early after PDT the cancer cells displayed ecto-CRT and secreted ATP before exhibiting biochemical signatures of apoptosis, through overlapping PERK-orchestrated pathways that require a functional secretory pathway and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-mediated plasma membrane/extracellular trafficking. Interestingly, eIF2α phosphorylation and caspase-8 signalling are dispensable for this ecto-CRT exposure. We also identified LRP1/CD91 as the surface docking site for ecto-CRT and found that depletion of PERK, PI3K p110α and LRP1 but not caspase-8 reduced the immunogenicity of the cancer cells. These results unravel a novel PERK-dependent subroutine for the early and simultaneous emission of two critical DAMPs following ROS-mediated ER stress.     

The Achilles’ heel of cancer: targeting tumors via lysosome-induced immunogenic cell death

Interest in the lysosome’s potential role in anticancer therapies has recently been appreciated in the field of immuno-oncology. Targeting lysosomes triggers apoptotic pathways, inhibits cytoprotective autophagy, and activates a unique form of apoptosis known as immunogenic cell death (ICD). This mechanism stimulates a local and systemic immune response against dead-cell antigens. Stressors that can lead to ICD include an abundance of ROS which induce lysosome membrane permeability (LMP). Dying cells express markers that activate immune cells. Dendritic cells engulf the dying cell and then present the cell’s neoantigens to T cells. The discovery of ICD-inducing agents is important due to their potential to trigger autoimmunity. In this review, we discuss the various mechanisms of activating lysosome-induced cell death in cancer cells specifically and the strategies that current laboratories are using to selectively promote LMP in tumors.Subject terms: Cancer immunotherapy, Immunotherapy, Tumour immunology, Apoptosis, Adaptive immunity     

The oncolytic peptide LTX-315 triggers immunogenic cell death

LTX-315 is a cationic amphilytic peptide that preferentially permeabilizes mitochondrial membranes, thereby causing partially BAX/BAK1-regulated, caspase-independent necrosis. Based on the observation that intratumorally injected LTX-315 stimulates a strong T lymphocyte-mediated anticancer immune response, we investigated whether LTX-315 may elicit the hallmarks of immunogenic cell death (ICD), namely (i) exposure of calreticulin on the plasma membrane surface, (ii) release of ATP into the extracellular space, (iii) exodus of HMGB1 from the nucleus, and (iv) induction of a type-1 interferon response. Using a panel of biosensor cell lines and robotized fluorescence microscopy coupled to automatic image analysis, we observed that LTX-315 induces all known ICD characteristics. This conclusion was validated by several independent methods including immunofluorescence stainings (for calreticulin), bioluminescence assays (for ATP), immunoassays (for HMGB1), and RT-PCRs (for type-1 interferon induction). When injected into established cancers, LTX-315 caused a transiently hemorrhagic focal necrosis that was accompanied by massive release of HMGB1 (from close-to-all cancer cells), as well as caspase-3 activation in a fraction of the cells. LTX-315 was at least as efficient as the positive control, the anthracycline mitoxantrone (MTX), in inducing local inflammation with infiltration by myeloid cells and T lymphocytes. Collectively, these results support the idea that LTX-315 can induce ICD, hence explaining its capacity to mediate immune-dependent therapeutic effects.Although cytotoxic chemotherapeutics used for the treatment of cancer often fail to achieve their ultimate goal – namely curing the patient in a permanent manner, without later relapse of the disease – there are a few examples in which conventional chemotherapy achieves long-term effects.^{1, 2} Beyond hematopoietic cancers, this applies for example to anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer, which achieves a marked reduction in the relapse rate.³ The extraordinary success of this treatment might be explained by the fact that anthracyclines mobilize the immune system against malignant cells. Thus, cancer cells treated with anthracyclines in vitro elicits a T lymphocyte-mediated immune response against tumor-associated antigens when they are injected subcutaneously into immunocompetent mice, thereby protecting mice against rechallenge with live tumor cells of the same kind.^{4, 5} In other words, anthracyclines trigger immunogenic cell death (ICD).^{6, 7, 8}At the immunological level, it turned out that several pattern recognition receptors are involved in the recognition of dying cancer cells, meaning that their knockout or loss-of-function mutation abolishes the anticancer immune response. This applies for example to toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1), meaning that anthracyclines have a reduced efficacy on tumors growing in Tlr4^−/− or Fpr1^−/− mice (as compared with WT mice) and that breast cancer patients bearing loss-of-function mutations in TLR4 or FPR1 have a comparatively poor prognosis after adjuvant chemotherapy with anthracyclines.^{9, 10} Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with anthracyclines causes a favorable change in the ratio between cytotoxic T lymphocytes and immunosuppressive regulatory T cells, in particular in those patients who manifest a complete pathological response.¹¹ This constitutes a further proof in favor of the concept that anthracyclines mediate their antineoplastic effects via the induction of an anticancer immune response.Anthracycline-induced ICD relies on one of the biochemical hallmarks of apoptosis, namely caspase activation. Thus, the pharmacological pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-fmk, as well as transfection with the baculovirus inhibitor p35, do not interfere with anthracycline-induced cell death (which apparently can proceed in the absence of caspase activation), yet do abolish the immunogenicity of anthracycline-induced cell death.⁴ Mechanistic studies revealed that caspase inhibition interferes with several of the hallmarks of anthracycline-induced ICD, namely the exposure of calreticulin (CALR) on the cell surface,^{5, 12} as well as with the release of ATP that is usually associated with the blebbing phase of apoptosis.^{13, 14} CALR acts as a potent ‘eat-me'' signal when it is exposed on the surface of stressed and dying cancer cells, facilitating the transfer of tumor antigens to dendritic cells.^{15, 16, 17} The mechanism of anthracycline-triggered CALR translocation to the cell surface is complex and involves the obligatory activation of caspase-8,^{18, 19} as well as the co-translocation of the disulfidisomerase PDIA3 (better known as ERp57).²⁰ ATP acts as a potent chemoattractant, hence causing the influx of myeloid cells into the tumor bed.^{21, 22} ATP is released through a partially autophagy-dependent mechanism that also involves the caspase-3-mediated cleavage of pannexin-1 channels.^{13, 21} Removal of CALR (by knockdown) or extracellular ATP (by expression of the ATP-degrading ectoenzyme ENTPDI, better known as CD39) abolishes the immunogenicity of anthracycline-triggered cell death, similarly as does caspase inhibition.^{5, 14} On the basis of these results, we have been assuming that ICD was intimately linked to caspase activation and that necrosis (which does not involve caspase activation) would be intrinsically incompatible with ICD. Indeed, induction of necrosis by freeze-thawing of otherwise untreated cancer cells failed to yield an immunogenic preparation; and freeze-thawing actually destroyed the immunogenic properties of anthracycline-treated cells.⁴ Other hallmarks of ICD, namely the exodus of HMGB1 from the nuclei of dead cells and the induction of a type-1 interferon response occur in a largely caspase-independent manner.^{9, 23}In apparent contradiction with our findings, Patricia Agostinis found that photodynamic therapy stimulates ICD without capase-8 activation,²⁴ establishing the existence of another type of ICD (called ‘type-2 ICD'' as opposed to the anthracycline-induced ‘type-1 ICD'') that differs in its signaling mechanisms.^{6, 25} In accord with this possibility, artificial activation of necroptosis by chemical dimerization of a modified transgenic RIPK3 (better known as RIP3) protein can induce ICD.²⁶ Hence, cell death that does not involve caspase activation can be perceived as immunogenic. Nonetheless, this cell death triggered by photodynamic therapy or RIP3 activation does exhibit all major signs of ICD including CALR exposure, ATP release, and HMGB1 exodus.^{24, 26}There is yet additional, though indirect evidence that necrosis may be immunogenic. Thus, LTX-315, a cationic amphiphilic peptide derivative that permeabilizes inner mitochondrial membranes and induces necrosis,^{27, 28} is a strong inducer of anticancer immune responses if injected into tumors developing on immunocompetent mice.^{29, 30} Indeed, intratumoral injection of LTX-315 can lead to the eradication of B16 melanomas, accompanied by an immune response that protects cured mice against rechallenge with live B16 cells.^{29, 30} Challenged by this observation, we investigated whether LTX-315 can trigger ICD by characterizing the hallmarks of ICD (CALR exposure, ATP release, HMGB1 exodus and type-1 interferon response). Our results indicate that LTX-315 can induce all characteristics of ICD in a caspase-independent manner in vitro. When injected in vivo, into tumors, LTX-315 induces massive focal necrosis, followed by immune infiltration.     

Ischemia and reperfusion injury combined with cisplatin induces immunogenic cell death in lung cancer cells

A first-line chemotherapeutic drug for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), cisplatin (CDDP), fails to induce immunogenic cell death (ICD) because it fails to induce calreticulin (CRT) exposure on the cell surface. We investigated the potential of ischemia and reperfusion injury (I/R) combined with CDDP to induce ICD in lung cancer cells. The in vitro model of I/R, oxygen-glucose deprivation and reperfusion (OGD/R), effectively induced CRT exposure, ATP secretion, high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) release and eIF2α phosphorylation in both Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) and A549 cells when combined with CDDP. By using a vaccine assay and coculture with bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs), we showed that OGD/R restored the immunogenicity of CDDP by phosphorylating eIF2α and demonstrated that OGD/R + CDDP (O + C) is an ICD inducer. Using the inguinal tumor model, we found that I/R significantly enhanced the tumor-killing effect of CDDP and Mitomycin C, and this effect relied on adaptive antitumor immunity. Consistently, I + C altered the ratio of interferon-gamma-secreting T lymphocytes, thus overcoming the immunosuppressive effect induced by CDDP. In conclusion, our research presents a new combination strategy and indicates that I/R is a potential anticancer immunogenic modality when combined with nonimmunogenic chemotherapy.Subject terms: Cancer immunotherapy, Chemotherapy     

Molecular mechanisms of programmed cell death

Programmed cell death is currently under active investigation. A recent meeting focused on the molecular machinery of programmed cell death and on its role in the pathogenesis of human diseases.     

Mechanisms of pre‐apoptotic calreticulin exposure in immunogenic cell death

Dying tumour cells can elicit a potent anticancer immune response by exposing the calreticulin (CRT)/ERp57 complex on the cell surface before the cells manifest any signs of apoptosis. Here, we enumerate elements of the pathway that mediates pre‐apoptotic CRT/ERp57 exposure in response to several immunogenic anticancer agents. Early activation of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)‐sessile kinase PERK leads to phosphorylation of the translation initiation factor eIF2α, followed by partial activation of caspase‐8 (but not caspase‐3), caspase‐8‐mediated cleavage of the ER protein BAP31 and conformational activation of Bax and Bak. Finally, a pool of CRT that has transited the Golgi apparatus is secreted by SNARE‐dependent exocytosis. Knock‐in mutation of eIF2α (to make it non‐phosphorylatable) or BAP31 (to render it uncleavable), depletion of PERK, caspase‐8, BAP31, Bax, Bak or SNAREs abolished CRT/ERp57 exposure induced by anthracyclines, oxaliplatin and ultraviolet C light. Depletion of PERK, caspase‐8 or SNAREs had no effect on cell death induced by anthracyclines, yet abolished the immunogenicity of cell death, which could be restored by absorbing recombinant CRT to the cell surface.