Variability in the properties of silicone gel breast implants.

Several generations of silicone gel breast implants have been produced by implant manufacturers. The primary material usually viewed as the base material in the manufacture of implants is polydimethylsiloxane. Polymeric reactions are notorious for their variability and nonuniformity. The elastomer used in different types of implants can have vastly different properties. Furthermore, the material properties associated with a particular type of implant can vary considerably from one lot to the next. Considering the various designs, styles, and manufacturing techniques associated with silicone gel implants, knowledge of the original properties of the implants before implantation is important in determining the effects of aging in vivo. This study was conducted to investigate differences in key mechanical and chemical properties of silicone gel breast implant materials. The two types of implants chosen for analysis were Silastic I and Silastic II control implants. Material property data were determined for both types of controls and significant differences were found in their values. Lot-to-lot variability was also investigated and found to be significant.     

In vivo aging characteristics of silicone gel breast implants compared to lot-matched controls

A study was conducted to investigate the effect of in vivo aging on the physical, mechanical, and chemical properties of Silastic II gel-filled breast implants. In the study, the properties of 16 Silastic II gel-filled explants (retrieved from eight patients), with in vivo duration times ranging from 4 months to 13 years, were compared with lot-matched control (unimplanted) samples. Tensile and tear strength properties were measured for both explant and control shells by using identical testing protocols. The tensile strength properties of shells, which were extracted with hexane to remove non-cross-linked silicones, were also measured. Swelling measurements were used to determine the average molecular weight between cross-links (or entanglements). In addition, scanning electron microscopy was applied in the comparison of the morphological features of the explants and their lot-matched controls. The results of the study suggest that the silicone polymer used to fabricate the shells does not undergo appreciable degradation for up to 13 years in vivo. The study represents an investigation of the world's largest known inventory of explanted breast implants with lot-matched controls.     

The effect of breast implants on the radiographic detection of microcalcification and soft-tissue masses

Current implants for breast augmentation containing silicone gel, saline, or both can totally obscure mammographic detection of microcalcifications and soft-tissue masses. To investigate the possibility of developing a more radiolucent implant, radiographs were obtained of silicone shells that contained silicone gel, saline, silicone gel and saline, polyurethane-covered silicone gel, gelatin, sunflower oil, and peanut oil. All radiographs were obtained using a Siemens Mammomat by placing the implant over an American College of Radiology mammography phantom. Results were measured by the ability to visualize or resolve the artifacts in the mammography phantom. The silicone shell alone minimally altered artifact resolution. Silicone shells filled with silicone gel, silicone gel and saline, saline alone, polyurethane-covered silicone gel, and gelatin were equal in radiodensity and completely obscured all phantom artifacts. Silicone shells filled with peanut oil and sunflower oil had equal radiodensity and allowed visualization of large microcalcifications and some soft-tissue masses. Current implants used for augmentation mammaplasty can totally obscure mammographic detection of microcalcifications and soft-tissue masses. A more radiolucent breast implant is possible, and further research is needed to define the best filler material and test its biocompatibility.     

Effect of povidone iodine on silicone gel breast implants in vitro: implications for clinical practice

Irrigation of breast implants and breast implant pockets with various solutions, including povidone iodine, has been a common practice among plastic surgeons for many years. Recent reports of potential weakening of silicone tubing have led the Food and Drug Administration to pronounce any contact of povidone iodine with breast implants a contraindication. An in vitro experimental study was undertaken to assess the effect of povidone iodine on the physical properties of silicone breast implant shells. Identical specimens were obtained from the shells of silicone breast implants according to published standards. The specimens were randomly assigned to eight groups of five and incubated in various solutions of decreasing concentration of povidone iodine (10% to 0.01%), and a control group (0.9% saline) was used. The containers were stored in a warming cabinet at 37 degrees C for 4 weeks. Testing of the specimens for tensile strength following 4 weeks of incubation showed no significant difference among any of the groups, including the control group. In addition, no correlation was shown between the concentration of the solution used and the tensile strength of the specimens.     

Biocompatibility of radiolucent breast implants

Current implants for breast augmentation containing silicone gel, saline, or both are radiopaque on mammographic examination and can totally obscure microcalcifications and soft-tissue masses. The effect of these implants on the detection of early breast cancers in patients who have undergone augmentation mammaplasty remains unproven and controversial. Implants filled with medium-chain triglycerides (peanut oil) are radiolucent on mammographic examination and allow visualization of both soft-tissue masses and microcalcifications. To investigate the biocompatibility of radiolucent implants, 10 cc of sterile, nonpyrogenic peanut oil was injected subcutaneously into rats using silicone gel as a control. Twenty-one rabbits had two 125-cc silicone shell implants inserted on either side of the chest wall. The right-sided shell was filled with 125 cc of sterile saline, and the left-sided shell was filled with 125 cc of sterile, nonpyrogenic peanut oil. Results were determined by both histologic and radiographic examination. Rats injected with peanut oil equivalent to 7 percent of their body weight rapidly absorbed the freely injected oil without detriment. Histologic examination of the lungs, liver, kidneys, and tissues adjacent to the injection sites demonstrated no abnormalities. There was no evidence of allergic, toxic, inflammatory, or neoplastic response. Eighteen of 21 rabbits survived more than 3 months. Radiographs showed the oil-filled implants to be radiolucent, whereas the saline-filled controls obscured the surrounding soft and bony tissues. Histologic examination demonstrated a fibrous capsule surrounding both types of implants. Histologic examination of the lungs, liver, and kidneys showed no significant abnormalities. These and previous studies have shown peanut oil to be biocompatible when freely injected either intramuscularly or subcutaneously. This study demonstrates that a radiolucent, peanut oil-filled implant is biocompatible in animals and that further long-term studies for its use in humans are merited.     

The deposition of talc in patients with silicone gel-filled breast implants.

This study was initiated to understand why talc was found in the entrance wounds and pericapsular scars of patients with silicone breast implants. Twenty-five surgical gloves made between 1977 and 1992 by a major glove manufacturer were evaluated with infrared spectroscopy. Seven gloves manufactured before early 1983 contained talc. Later manufactured gloves contained calcium carbonate instead of talc. Talc-containing gloves were submitted to independent laboratories for scanning electron microscopic examination and x-ray microanalysis to obtain finer detail. Remnants of the mold-release agent talc were found in the matrix of the patient-contact side of the glove. Wetting studies showed that silicone oil (gel bleed) immediately wet the surface of rubber glove. After donning, silicone oil was massaged between the thumb and index finger of each washed, talc-containing glove for 1 minute and then daubed from the glove to a microscopic slide. The slide was viewed with polarized light microscopy for the presence of talc crystals. Transfer of talc occurred using silicone oil, but not saline, in each talc-containing glove. Three factors were likely involved in the greater talc deposition that occurred with patients undergoing silicone gel-filled breast implantation than in patients undergoing other surgical procedures. (1) The wetting of the gloves with silicone gel bleed from implants loosened the talc in the glove matrix. (2) Hand-intensive surgical use freed the talc from the gloves. (3) Loose talc adhered to the silicone elastomer of the breast implants and was deposited with implant placement.     

Scanning electron microscopy characterization of surgical instrument damage to breast implants.

In this article, mechanisms of breast-implant failure caused by surgical instruments commonly used to perform implantation, breast biopsies, needle localization procedures, cyst aspirations, and explantation are described. Failure was artificially induced in breast-implant shells using various types of surgical instruments, including scalpels, suture needles, hypodermic needles, hemostats, and Adson forceps. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to document the morphology of the failure sites produced by these instruments. Micrographs were used to categorize failure according to a specific type of surgical instrument. SEM micrographs were also obtained on explants that failed in situ, and the morphology of the corresponding failure sites was examined. The study was designed to document a range of failure mechanisms associated with gel-filled, saline-filled, double-lumen (saline-gel), and soybean oil-filled implants. The results of the study also demonstrate that SEM can often be used to determine the cause of breast-implant failure.     

PHEMA as a fibrous capsule-resistant breast prosthesis

The presence of a silicone (poly-dimethyl siloxane) breast prosthesis in a breast reconstruction patient typically leads to fibrous tissue encapsulation of the prosthesis. Fibrous capsular contracture forces the prosthesis into a hardened sphere. The initially satisfactory cosmetic result can thus be changed into a deformed mass of inappropriate compliance. It is the author's hope with the present study to identify a material for implantation with a diminished tendency to form fibrous encapsulation, to improve the long-term results of prosthetic implants. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the early capsule production quality of poly-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (PHEMA) and poly-dimethyl siloxane (silicone). Each of five rats subcutaneously underwent implantation with both a disk of poly-dimethyl siloxane (control) and a similar disk of PHEMA. In this study, the extent of fibrous encapsulation was assessed at 6 weeks after implantation of the two disk types. The five disks of poly-dimethyl siloxane were embedded in fibrous tissue, whereas there was no apparent fibrous tissue surrounding the implants of PHEMA. The author concludes that the results for PHEMA were superior to those for silicone at 6 weeks with regard to fibrous encapsulation (p = 0.0312).     

"Bleeding" of silicone from bag-gel breast implants, and its clinical relation to fibrous capsule reaction.

We present evidence of the following. 1. Modern silicone bag-gel breast implants leak silicone gel through the bag. 2. The amount of silicone leaked by an intact implant varies from one implant to another, and is not constant for any type or brand. 3. The leaked silicone, together with fibrous thickening and various degrees of inflammation will be found in capsules surrounding the implants if extensive biopsies are taken and many sections are examined.     

Analysis of silicon in human tissues with special reference to silicone breast implants

The increase, in the last two decades, in the application of silicones (polysiloxanes) and inorganic silicon compounds in medicine and the food industry, has exposed the human body to extensive contacts with these substances. Most silicone breast implants contain a gel consisting of a crosslinked silicone elastomer swollen by silicone oil (PDMS). Diffusion of PDMS through the silicone elastomer envelope and rupture of the envelope with release of the gel contents both occur clinically. The amount and distribution of silicone compounds in various tissues are key issues in the assessment of health problems connected with silicone implants. We have measured by GFAAS the Si content of tissues from normal and implant patients and the organic solvent extractable Si levels (assumed to be silicone), using careful control of sample collection and preparation. Whole blood levels were: implant patients mean 38.8 (SD 25.6) (microg/kg), controls mean 24.2 (SD 26.7) (microg/kg) in one study and subsequently 103.8 (SD 112.1) and 74.3 (SD 86.5) (microg/kg) in another study. Capsular tissue levels were: gel implants 25047 (SD 39313) (mg/kg of dry tissue), saline implants 20.0 (SD 27.3) (mg/kg of dry tissue) and controls 0.24 (SD 0.39) (mg/kg of dry tissue). Breast milk levels were: implant patients mean 58.7 (SD 33.8) (microg/kg), controls mean 51.1 (SD 31.0) (microg/kg); infant formula mean was 4.40 (mg/kg). Various precautions were undertaken to avoid Si contamination in this work, the most important being a) the use of a Class 100 laboratory for sample preparation and b) application of strict and elaborate washing procedure for specimen collection tools and laboratory plasticware. This data demonstrated that to properly interpret the importance of these numbers for human health, a larger study of "normal" levels of Si in human tissues should be undertaken and factors such as diet, water, race and geographical location should be considered.     

Silicone gel-filled breast implant integrity: a retrospective review of 478 consecutively explanted implants

Concern has been expressed over the long-term integrity of silicone gel breast implants. There are no large series representing experience with these implants outside of the United States. A retrospective case note review of explanted silicone breast implants was performed; 478 implants have been explanted during the past 11 years and relate to the use of these devices since 1971. Loss of implant integrity was not simply related to its age in vivo. Failure was more likely with implants of the late 1970s and early 1980s (second generation) and with subpectoral placement. Implant failure was independent of capsular contracture as the indication for removal (p = 0.09). There is no evidence that the currently used textured silicone gel breast implants are subject to the same loss of integrity as previous examples of these devices. The life span of these implants, the first of which are approaching 10 years in vivo, is at present unknown. Information concerning the integrity of silicone gel breast implants is essential in the current climate for counseling of both new and old implant recipients.     

Analysis of the soft-tissue response to components used in the manufacture of breast implants: rat animal model.

The implant-tissue response to the silicone gel mammary prosthesis requires a more thorough evaluation in light of recent concerns related to human connective-tissue diseases, contracture, infection, and neoplasia. The silicone prosthesis is not a homogeneous implant but is a milieu of various silicone chemistries. Silicone polymer precursors and prosthesis components (silicone shells, shells extracted of their low-molecular-weight components, silica-free silicone, silicone oil, fumed silica, and silicone extract) were implanted subcutaneously using a nonhemorrhagic technique into the backs of Lew/SsN rats (n = 90), two implants per rat, for periods of 7, 14, 28, 56, and 90 days for a total of 6 implants per material per time period. Histologic analysis was performed on specimens from the harvested soft tissue. The intensity of the cellular and capsular response was lowest for the silicone oil and increased as the material's molecular weight increased and material compliance decreased. Fumed silica elicited the most highly reactive cellular response. From this study it is apparent that the polymer's molecular weight influences its migration, encapsulation, and intensity of cellular response. Further, the silicone extract distillate elicited a highly intense cellular response with pronounced lymphocyte invasion. The human relevance of this work awaits further correlation with implant retrieval and in vivo performance.     

Elevated serum silicon levels in women with silicone gel breast implants

The metatolic fate of silicone gel leaked from an intact or ruptured prosthesis is unknown. In this study, serum was blindly assayed by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) for elemental silicon in 72 women with silicone gel breast implants and 55 control women (mean age 48 yr, both groups). Blood was drawn and processed using silicon-free materials. The mean silicon level in controls was 0.13±0.07 mg/L (range 0.06–0.35 mg/L), whereas in implant patients, the mean was significantly higher at 0.28±0.22 mg/L (range 0.06–0.87 mg/L) (P<0.01, Student'st-test with correction for unequal variances). Using the mean of the control group +2 SD as a cutoff for normal range (0.27 mg/L), 25/72 (34.7%) implant patients exceeded this value, compared with 2/55 (3.6%) controls. There was no significant correlation between past rupture of one or both implants, current rupture at the time of the blood draw, or the number of years with implants and silicon levels. The results suggest that serum silicon levels are elevated in many women with silicone gel breast implants. The chemical species involved and kinetics of this elevation remain to be determined.     

The biophysical and histologic properties of capsules formed by smooth and textured silicone implants in the rabbit.

Capsular contracture remains the major complication of reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if a silicone implant with a textured surface will form a capsule of significantly different biophysical and histologic properties than conventional smooth silicone. Thirty smooth and 30 textured silicone tissue expanders were implanted under the panniculus carnosus of rabbits. After 3 months, measurements related to contracture were performed on anesthetized animals in an investigator-blinded, controlled manner. Intraexpander pressures were measured as saline was injected over time. We found a significant correlation between intraexpander pressures, applanation tonometry, and Baker class. Histology revealed a thicker, more adherent, and inflammatory capsule around the textured silicone implants as compared with the smooth silicone implants. Dynamic pressures were plotted against volume of saline within the two types of implants. Statistical analysis revealed that the textured implants form a tighter and thicker capsule than the smooth implants after 3 months of observation (p less than 0.005).     

Long-term health status of Danish women with silicone breast implants

Long-term safety data are important in the evaluation of possible adverse health outcomes related to silicone breast implants. The authors evaluated long-term symptoms and conditions and medication use among 190 Danish women with cosmetic silicone breast implants compared with 186 women who had undergone breast reduction surgery and with 149 women from the general population. Breast implant and reduction surgeries were performed from 1973 to 1988 at one public hospital and one private plastic surgery clinic. Among women with breast implants, the average implantation time was 19 years, 60 percent (n = 114) had only one implantation, and 10 percent (n = 19) had undergone explantation before the time of study (1997 to 1998). The authors found no material differences in self-reported diseases or symptoms among study groups, except for breast pain, which was reported nearly three times as often by women with implants than by women with breast reduction (odds ratio, 2.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.4 to 5.3). Approximately 80 percent of women in each study group reported at least one symptom. No consistent differences were observed in the seroprevalences of antinuclear antibodies or other autoantibodies. Self-reported use of psychotropic drugs was higher among women with breast implants than among either control group. The authors conclude that long-term cosmetic breast implantation may cause capsular contracture and breast pain but does not appear to be associated with other symptoms, diseases, or autoimmune reactivity. The authors' finding of excess use of drugs for treatment of depression and anxiety among women with breast implants may warrant further investigation.     

Radiolucent prosthetic gel.

The successful use of silicone breast implants is complicated by their interference with mammography. We have evaluated clinically available implant filling materials and found that a new Bio-Oncotic gel approximates the radiolucency of normal breast tissue. Silicone implants completely obscure areas of the breast in mammography. Recently proposed as a filler material, peanut oil is significantly more radiolucent than normal tissue. Physiologic saline solution compares favorably as a tissue-density-simulating substance. However, saline's lack of lubricating properties results in leakage, making it less than optimal. Bio-Oncotic gel is biologically compatible. We conclude that this gel is the most appropriate filler for breast prostheses. Clinical studies are indicated.     

Microstructural shell strength of the Subantarctic pteropod <Emphasis Type="Italic">Limacina helicina antarctica</Emphasis>

Anthropogenic inputs of CO₂ are changing ocean chemistry and will likely affect calcifying marine organisms, particularly aragonite producers such as pteropods. This work seeks to set a benchmark analysis of pteropod shell properties and variability using nanoindentation and electron microscopy to measure the structural and mechanical properties of Subantarctic pteropod shells (Limacina helicina antarctica) collected in 1998 and 2007. The 1998 shells were collected by a sediment trap deployed at 2000 m, 47°S, 142°E, and the 2007 shells were collected using nets from mixed-layer waters in the region (44°–54°S, 140°–155°E). Transmission electron microscopy revealed that the shells are composed of a polycrystalline structure, and no obvious porosity was visible. The hardness and modulus of the shells were measured using shell cross-section nanoindentation, across various regions of the shell from the inner to outer whorl. No change in mechanical properties was found with respect to the region of the shell cross-section probed. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean modulus or hardness of the shells between the 1998 and 2007 data sets. No major changes in the mechanical properties of these pteropod shells were detected between the 1998 and 2007 data sets, and we discuss the possible biases in the sampling techniques in complicating our analysis. However, quantifying the mechanical properties and microstructure of calcified may still provide insights into the responses of calcification to environmental changes, such as ocean acidification.     

The correction of capsular contracture by conversion to "dual-plane" positioning: technique and outcomes

Little has been published regarding the treatment of patients with long-established capsular contracture after previous submuscular or subglandular breast augmentation. This study reviews 7 years of experience in treating established capsular contracture after augmentation mammaplasty by relocating implants to the "dual-plane" or partly subpectoral position. A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who were treated for capsular contracture using this technique between 1993 and 1999. Data collected included the date of the original augmentation, the original implant location, date of revision and type of implant used, length of follow-up, outcome, and any ensuing complications. Different surgical techniques were used, depending on whether the prior implant was located in a subglandular or submuscular plane. All patients had revisions such that their implants were relocated to a dual plane, with the superior two thirds or so of the implant located beneath the pectoralis major muscle and the inferior one third located subglandularly. Of 85 patients reviewed, 54 had their original implants in a submuscular position and 31 had their initial augmentation in a subglandular position. Of the 54 patients whose implants were initially submuscular, 23 patients (43 percent) had silicone gel implants, 15 patients (28 percent) had double-lumen implants, and the remaining 16 patients (30 percent) had saline implants. Of the 31 patients whose implants were initially subglandular, 20 patients (65 percent) had silicone gel implants, three patients (10 percent) had double-lumen implants, and the remaining eight patients (26 percent) had saline implants. Fifty-one patients (60 percent) had replacement with saline implants (37 smooth saline, 14 textured saline), whereas 34 (40 percent) had silicone gel implants (seven smooth gel, 27 textured gel). The average time from previous augmentation to revision was 9 years 9 months. The average follow-up time after conversion to the dual-plane position was 11.5 months. Only three of 85 patients required reoperation for complications, all of which involved some degree of implant malposition. Of patients converted to the dual plane, 98 percent were free of capsular contracture and were Baker class I at follow-up, whereas 2 percent were judged as Baker class II. There were no Baker level III or IV contractures at follow-up. The dual-plane method of breast augmentation has proved to be an effective technique for correcting established capsular contracture after previous augmentation mammaplasty. This technique appears to be effective when performed with either silicone or saline-filled implants.     

Textured-surface saline-filled silicone breast implants for augmentation mammaplasty

The earliest silicone breast implants were smooth-surface, silicone rubber devices filled with either silicone gel or saline. Because of persistent problems with capsular contracture, polyurethane-covered silicone implants were developed as an alternative. Particularly in the short run, these alternatives proved highly successful at reducing the incidence of capsular contracture. By 1990, polyurethane-covered implants were rapidly becoming the preferred implant choice of many plastic surgeons, but for legal, regulatory, financial, and safety reasons they were withdrawn from the market by Bristol-Myers in 1991. Meanwhile, during the late 1980s, surface texturing and improved materials became available on other silicone breast implants and expanders. Most studies suggest that textured-surface silicone gel-filled implants, saline-filled implants, and tissue expanders have less frequent capsular contracture than their smooth-surface counterparts.     

Antinuclear antibodies and breast implants.

Anecdotal reports have linked silicone breast implants to autoimmune diseases, with scleroderma being mentioned most often. In view of other environmental influences--such as silica mining and the toxic oil syndrome--thought to predispose to scleroderma, more systematic immunologic information on women with silicone implants is needed to assess any possible relation to autoimmunity. A cross-sectional survey was carried out with 150 women, of whom 131 had implants. Group 0 consisted of 19 volunteer women without breast implants who felt healthy, group I was 38 volunteer women with breast implants who felt healthy, group II was 82 women with implants who had various symptoms, and group III was 11 women with implants who had autoimmune disease. Scleroderma was overrepresented in group III (6 of 11). Antinuclear antibodies were determined on Hep-2 cells, using serum dilutions of 1:16, 1:64, and 1:256. A positive test was indicated by 1+ or more fluorescence at 1:256. Antinuclear antibody tests were positive in 0% of group 0, 18% of group I (P < .05 versus group 0), 26% of group II, and 64% of group III. There was no correlation between antinuclear antibody positivity and type of implant, indication for implantation, time since first implantation, total number of implants, and report of implant leak or rupture. Women with breast implants may be at risk for the development of antinuclear antibodies. Proof of such an association will require large-scale prospective studies and epidemiologic analyses.