Comparison of the binding sites for the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein at the lactose and galactose promoters

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis has been used to visualise and quantitate complexes between the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) and DNA fragments containing the promoter region of either the E. coli galactose or lactose operons. We show that, although CRP binding to the gal fragment is weaker than binding to the lac fragment, in each case, stable complexes are formed between one dimer of CRP and one molecule of DNA. We have examined the effects of a series of deletions and point mutations in the gal promoter region on CRP binding. From the position of deletions and mutations which prevent the formation of stable complexes, we deduce the location and extent of the sequence at the CRP binding site. We show that it covers approximately the same length of sequence as the binding site at the lac promoter. Unlike the lac site, the gal site contains no palindromic sequence. We discuss the importance of symmetry in the sequence at CRP binding sites and the validity of CRP binding consensus sequences which have been proposed.     

Regulation of open complex formation at the Escherichia coli galactose operon promoters. Simultaneous interaction of RNA polymerase, gal repressor and CAP/cAMP.

The regulation of open complex formation at the Escherichia coli galactose operon promoters by galactose repressor and catabolite activator protein/cyclic AMP (CAP/cAMP) was investigated in DNA-binding and kinetic experiments performed in vitro. We found that gal repressor and CAP/cAMP bind to the gal regulatory region independently, resulting in simultaneous occupancy of the two gal operators and the CAP/cAMP binding site. Both CAP/cAMP and gal repressor altered the partitioning of RNA polymerase between the two overlapping gal promoters. Open complexes formed in the absence of added regulatory proteins were partitioned between gal P1 and P2 with occupancies of 25% and 75%, respectively. CAP/cAMP caused open complexes to be formed nearly exclusively at P1 (98% occupancy). gal repressor caused a co-ordinated, but incomplete, switch in promoter partitioning from P1 to P2 in both the absence and presence of CAP/cAMP. We measured the kinetic constants governing open complex formation and decay at the gal promoters in the absence and presence of gal repressor and CAP/cAMP. CAP/cAMP had the largest effect on the kinetics of open complex formation, resulting in a 30-fold increase in the apparent binding constant. We conclude that the regulation of open complex formation at the gal promoters does not result from competition between gal repressor, CAP/cAMP and RNA polymerase for binding at the gal operon regulatory region, but instead results from the interactions of the three proteins during the formation of a nucleoprotein complex on the gal DNA fragment. Finally, we present a kinetic model for the regulation of open complex formation at the gal operon.     

Position 127 amino acid substitutions affect the formation of CRP:cAMP:lacP complexes but not CRP:cAMP:RNA polymerase complexes at lacP.

The lacP DNA binding and activation characteristics of CRP having amino acid substitutions at position 127 were investigated. Wild-type (WT) and T127C CRP footprinted lacP DNA in the presence of DNase I in a cAMP-dependent manner. The T127G, T127I, and T127S forms of CRP failed to footprint lacP both in the absence and in the presence of cAMP. Consistent with these data, WT and T127C CRP:cAMP complexes exhibited high affinity for the lacP CRP site whereas T127G, T127I, or T127S CRP:cAMP complexes exhibited low affinity for the lacP CRP site. CRP:cAMP:RNA polymerase (RNAP) complexes formed at lacP in reactions that contained WT, T127C, T127G, T127I, or T127S CRP. These results demonstrate that allosteric changes important for cAMP-mediated CRP activation are differentially affected by amino acid substitution at position 127. Proper cAMP-mediated reorientation of the DNA binding helices required either threonine or cysteine at position 127. However, cAMP-dependent interaction of CRP with RNAP was accomplished regardless of the amino acid at position 127. RNAP:lacP complexes that supported high-level lac RNA synthesis formed rapidly in reactions that contained WT or T127C CRP whereas RNAP:lacP complexes that supported only low-level lac RNA synthesis formed at slower rates in reactions that contained T127I or T127S CRP. The T127G CRP:cAMP:RNAP:lacP complex failed to activate lacP. The results of this study lead us to conclude that threonine 127 plays an important role in transduction of the signal from the CRP cyclic nucleotide binding pocket that promotes proper orientation of the DNA binding helices and only a minor, if any, role in the functional exposure of the CRP RNAP interaction domain.     

Mutants of the lac promoter with large insertions and deletions between the CAP binding site and the -35 region

A set of the lac promoter mutants that have varying lengths of the spacer between the CAP binding site and the -35 region was constructed. The mutants have the spacer length increased by five (I5 mutant), or eleven (I11) residues or decreased by eleven residues (D11). We also present a construction of the hybrid between the gal and lac promoters in which the CAP binding site and the -35 region of the gal promoter are fused to the lac -10 region. The promoter fragments were assembled through ligations of chemically synthesized oligodeoxynucleotides and cloned into a pBR322-derivative vector. The results of the in vivo assays of promoter activity show that the I11 mutation results in an active but weak promoter that can be stimulated by CAP, though to a lesser degree than the wild-type lac promoter. The other mutants exhibit no promoter activity. Since the insertion of 11-bp preserves the location of the CAP binding site on the same side on the DNA helix, the data demonstrate the importance of spatial alignment between the CAP binding site and the promoter. The fact that the gal::lac hybrid is inactive as a promoter indicates also that catabolite activation is a highly complex process in which the -35 and -10 regions cannot be easily exchanged between promoters.     

Is DNA unwound by the cyclic AMP receptor protein?

Superhelical pBR 322 derivatives have been relaxed by eukaryotic topoisomerase I in the presence or in the absence of E. coli cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) and of cyclic AMP (cAMP). CRP alone, or cAMP alone do not affect the average linking number of the distribution of the relaxed topoisomers. Hence, they do not unwind the template. In the presence of cAMP, CRP induces a small unwinding. The extent of this unwinding is barely modified when the relaxation is carried out on a similar vector plasmid where the CRP binding site of the lac or of the gal operon has been inserted. Under these conditions, we checked that CRP occupies the lactose control site and that upon addition of RNA polymerase, the corresponding promoter is readily activated. These findings are difficult to reconcile with the proposal that activation of these promoters results from the binding of the CRP-cAMP complex to left-handed DNA sequences.     

Segment-specific mutagenesis of the regulatory region in the Escherichia coli galactose operon: isolation of mutations reducing the initiation of transcription and translation

Using hydroxylamine mutagenesis in vitro, mutations were introduced into a short DNA fragment containing the two overlapping promoters of the Escherichia coli galactose operon and the start of the first gal gene, galE. The mutagenised fragment was inserted into a lac expression plasmid. In such a vector, lac expression is controlled by the gal promoter region. Amongst eighteen candidates in which expression was reduced due to mutations in the gal fragment, twelve contained promoter mutations and six carried mutations that reduce the initiation of galE translation. The candidates in which promoter activity was reduced contained mutations affecting the promoter P1, which is dependent on the cyclic AMP-receptor protein complex (cAMP-CRP) for activation. All carried mutations in the sequence 5'GTGA3' at the CRP binding site. One of the twelve also contained a second mutation affecting the second promoter, P2, which normally functions in the absence of cAMP-CRP. Amongst the six candidates affecting galE translation, two contained a mutation that changes the initiator codon from AUG to AUA and almost completely suppresses galE expression. The mutations in the other four candidates affect the ribosome binding sequence, 5'GGAG3'. However, multiple mutations that abolish this sequence do not totally suppress galE expression, showing that there must be another way to guide ribosomes to the correct initiation site.