Effect of a long-lasting opioid receptor antagonist (naltrexone) on pulsatile LH release in early postpartum Holstein dairy cows

The present trial was the first one to investigate the effect of an intravenous injection of naltrexone, an opioid receptor antagonist that has a longer duration of action than that of naloxone, on the LH pulse in early postpartum Holstein dairy cows. On Day 10 postpartum, blood samples were collected from cows at 10-min intervals for a period of 4 h before (pre-injection period) and a period of 5 h after (post-injection period) an intravenous injection of 10 mL of saline (Control Group, n=5) or 300 mg of naltrexone in 10 mL of saline (Naltrexone Group, n=5). The plasma LH level was assayed by double antibody radioimmunoassay. The number of LH peaks per 1 h, the mean LH level, and the amplitude of LH peaks were analyzed utilizing the Pulsar algorithm, and data were compared by repeated measures ANOVA. No differences were observed in the parameters of LH pulse in the pre-injection period between the Control and the Naltrexone Groups (P>0.10). In the Naltrexone Group, the number of LH peaks per 1 h and the mean LH level were significantly higher in the post-injection period than in the pre-injection period (0.85 +/- 0.29 vs. 1.24 +/- 0.17, P<0.05, and 1.81 +/- 0.70 vs. 2.47 +/- 0.92 ng/ml, P<0.05, respectively), but there was no significant increase in the amplitude of LH peaks (1.48 +/- 0.64 vs. 1.83 +/- 0.82 ng/ml, P>0.10). In contrast, all of the parameters of LH pulse remained unchanged in the Control Group (P>0.10). These results suggested that an intravenous injection of naltrexone activates the LH pulse.     

Relationships between insulin and glucose metabolism and pituitary-ovarian functions in fasted heifers

The effects of fasting between Days 8 and 16 of the estrous cycle on plasma concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH), progesterone, cortisol, glucose and insulin were determined in 4 fasted and 4 control heifers during an estrous cycle of fasting and in the subsequent cycle after fasting. Cortisol levels were unaffected by fasting. Concentrations of insulin and glucose, however, were decreased (p less than 0.05) by 12 and 36 h, respectively, after fasting was begun and did not return to control values until 12 h (insulin) and 4 to 7 days (glucose) after fasting ended. Concentrations of progesterone were greater (p less than 0.05) in fasted than in control heifers from Day 10 to 15 of the estrous cycle during fasting, while LH levels were lower (p less than 0.01) in fasted than in control heifers during the last 24 h of fasting. Concentrations of LH increased (p less than 0.01) abruptly in fasted heifers in the first 4 h after they were refed on Day 16 of the fasted cycle. Concentrations (means +/- SEM) of LH also were greater (p less than 0.05) in fasted (11.2 +/- 2.6 ng/ml) than in control (4.7 +/- 1.2 ng/ml) heifers during estrus of the cycle after fasting; this elevated LH was preceded by a rebound response in insulin levels in the fasted-refed heifers, with insulin increasing from 176 +/- 35 pg/ml to 1302 +/- 280 pg/ml between refeeding and estrus of the cycle after fasting. Concentrations of LH, glucose and insulin were similar in both groups after Day 2 of the postfasting cycle. Concentrations of progesterone in two fasted heifers and controls were similar during the cycle after fasting, whereas concentrations in the other fasted heifers were less than 1 ng/ml until Day 10, indicating delayed ovulation and (or) reduced luteal function. Thus, aberrant pituitary and luteal functions in fasted heifers were associated with concurrent fasting-induced changes in insulin and glucose metabolism.     

Effects of oxytocin on follicular development and duration of the estrous cycle in heifers

Holstein heifers were used to study effects of exogenous administration of oxytocin on luteal function and ovarian follicular development. Twelve heifers were monitored for 1 estrous cycle to confirm normal ovarian function. At the subsequent estrus, these animals were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments: saline control, (Group 1, n=4), oxytocin (Group 2, n=4) and saline pregnant (Group 3, n=4). Group 2 received continuous infusion of oxytocin (1.9 mg/d) from Days 14 to 26 after estrus, while Groups 1 and 3 received saline infusion during the same period. Group 3 were artificially inseminated at estrus. Daily blood samples were collected for oxytocin and progesterone assay. Ovarian follicles and corpus luteum (CL) development were monitored daily by transrectal ultrasonography until Day 32 after estrus. Plasma progesterone (P4) concentrations prior to initiation of infusion were 7.6+/-1.3 ng/mL on Day 14. They then decreased to <1 ng/mL on Day 19 for Group 1 and on Day 28 for Group 2. The interestrous interval was longer (P <0.05) for heifers that received oxytocin infusion. During the infusion period P4 concentrations were not different (P >0.05) between Group 2 and 3 but declined gradually from Day 20 in Group 2 despite the presence of high plasma oxytocin concentrations. Control heifers had 2 waves of follicular growth, with the second dominant follicle ovulating. Three of the 4 oxytocin-infused animals had an additional wave, with the third dominant follicle ovulating. Oxytocin infusion had no effect on size of the ovulating follicle (P >0.05) and the number of Class 1 follicles (3 to 5 mm, P >0.1). Differences in the number of Class 2 follicles (6 to 9 mm) among treatments on Days 15 to 22 after estrus were not detected (P >0.1) except on Days 23 to 26, when Group 2 had fewer follicles than Group 3 (P <0.05). The results show that continuous infusion of oxytocin during normal luteolysis delays luteal regression without inhibiting follicular development.     

The variability in the interval between estrus and ovulation in cattle and its determinants

Fertility of Holstein cows has been decreasing for years and, to a lesser extent, the fertility of heifers too but more recently. A hypothesis to explain this phenomenon may be that the chronology of events leading to ovulation is different for those animals bred nowadays when compared to what was reported previously; this would result in an inappropriate time of insemination. Therefore, two experiments were designed to investigate the relationships among estrus behavior, follicular growth, hormonal events and time of ovulation in Holstein cows and heifers. In the first experiment, the onset of estrus, follicular growth, patterns of estradiol-17beta, progesterone and LH, and the time of ovulation were studied in 12 cyclic Holstein heifers that had their estrus synchronized using the Crestar method; this was done twice, 3 weeks apart. The intervals between estrus and ovulation, estrus and the LH peak, and between the LH peak and ovulation were, respectively, 38.5 h +/-3.0, 9.1 +/- 2.0 and 29.4 h +/-1.5 (mean+/- S.E.M). The variation in the interval between estrus and the LH peak explained 80.6% of the variation in the interval between estrus and ovulation. The intervals between estrus and the LH peak, and estrus and ovulation were correlated with estradiol-17beta peak value (r=-0.423, P <0.04 and r=-0.467, P<0.02, respectively). Positive correlation coefficients for the number of follicle larger than 5 mm, and negative correlation coefficients for the size of the preovulatory follicle with the intervals between estrus and LH peak, LH peak and ovulation, and estrus and ovulation suggest an ovarian control of these intervals. In respect to its role to explain the variation in the interval between estrus and ovulation, the variation in the interval between estrus and the LH peak was evaluated further in a second set of experiments utilizing 12 pubertal Holstein heifers and 35 Holstein cows. The duration of the interval between the beginning of estrus and the LH peak was longer in heifers than in cows (4.15 h versus -1.0 h; P <0.002); the variation for this interval was higher in cows than in heifers (S.E.M.= 1.2 h versus 0.8 h; P=0.01). According to the results of these studies it can be proposed that estradiol and other product(s) of ovarian origin regulate not only the duration of intervals between the onset of estrus and the LH surge but also between the LH surge and ovulation. From the results obtained in the first experiment, it may be postulated that differences observed between cows and heifers for the duration of the interval between onset of estrus and the LH surge as well as for the variation of this interval would be observed also for the interval between the onset of estrus and ovulation. Therefore, on a practical point of view, the long interval between the onset of estrus and ovulation and the high variation of this interval, especially in cows, may be a source of low fertility and should be considered when analysing reproductive disorders.     

Influence of CIDR treatment during superovulation on embryo production and hormonal patterns in cattle

One of the major sources of success in embryo transfer is timing of AI relative to the LH surge and ovulation. The aim of this study was to compare the embryo production following superovulation during a PGF2alpha (control cycle) or a CIDR-B synchronized cycle (CIDR-B cycle). CIDR-B (CIDR-B ND, Virbac, Carros, France) was inserted on Day 11 of a previously synchronized cycle and left for 5 days. A total dose of 350 microg FSH was administered (eight injections i.m. for 4 days; first on Day 13, decreasing doses) and PGFalpha analog (750 microg i.m.: Uniandine ND, Schering-Plough, Levallois-Perret, France) injected at the time of third FSH injection. Artificial inseminations were performed 12 and 24 h after standing estrus (Day 0). Embryos were collected on Day 7. Luteinizing hormone was measured by EIA (Reprokit Sanofi, Libourne, France) from blood samples collected every 3 h for 36 h, starting 24 h after PGF2alpha (control cycle) or 12 h after CIDR-B removal (CIDR-B cycle). The effects of treatment group and interval between the LH peak and AI (two classes, < 10 and > or = 10 h) on embryo production and quality were analyzed by ANOVA. No effect of treatment was observed on embryo production variables. The intervals between the end of treatment and onset of estrus and between end of treatment and LH surge were greater in heifers treated during a control than a CIDR-B cycle, respectively (45.5 +/- 1.4 versus 31.9 +/- 0.7; 42.0 +/- 1.6 versus 31.0 +/- 1.5; P < 0.05), but maximal LH and estradiol concentrations, at the preovulatory surge were similar in control and CIDR-B synchronized heifers. The numbers of viable and Grade I embryos were significantly increased (P < 0.01) when animals had an interval from LH peak to first AI > or = 10 h (7.2 +/- 0.9 and 3.5 +/- 0.6) when compared to shorter intervals (4.2 +/- 1.1 and 2.0 +/- 0.7) whereas total number of embryos was unchanged (11.8 +/- 1.4 versus 10.3 +/- 1.8). It is concluded that late occurrence of LH peaks in relation to estrous behavior is associated with a lower embryo quality when first AIs are performed systematically 12 h after standing estrus. Further studies are needed to know if results may be improved when making AI at a later time after standing estrus or if LH assays are useful to better monitor AI time.     

Luteolytic effect of 13,14-dihydro-PGF-2 alpha in heifers

Holstein heifers (4/group) were injected intramuscularly with 0, 5, 10 or 25 mg 13,14-dihydro-PGF-2 alpha on Day 10 of the oestrous cycle. Complete luteolysis and precocious oestrus occurred in 3 of 4 heifers receiving 25 mg and 1 of 4 receiving 10 mg 13,14-dihydro-PGF-2 alpha injected i.m. These features were not affected in heifers injected with 0 or 5 mg 13,14-dihydro-PGF-2 alpha, although plasma progesterone concentrations were depressed in all treated heifers within 75 min. LH concentrations were elevated between 5 and 8 h after 13,14-dihydro-PGF-2 alpha in all treated heifers. The addition of 13,14-dihydro-PGF-2 alpha to dispersed bovine luteal cells did not affect progesterone accumulation during a 2-h period. These results suggest that 13,14-dihydro-PGF-2 alpha may play a role in PGF-2 alpha-induced luteolysis.     

Effect of estrus synchronization with Syncro-Mate-B((R)) on serum luteinizing hormone, progesterone and conception rate in Brahman heifers

Twenty-two estrous cyclic, 2-yr-old Brahman heifers were randomly assigned to receive either estrus synchronization with Syncro-Mate-B((R)) (SMB; 11) or no treatment (Control; 11). Blood samples were collected via tail vessel puncture at onset of estrus and daily thereafter until Day 11 after estrus. Blood samples were also collected from five SMB and five Control heifers at 0, 4, 8 and 12 h after the onset of estrus. All samples were processed to yield serum and stored at -20 degrees C until radioimmunoassay. Heifers were inseminated by one technician using semen from a single ejaculate of a Brahman bull 12 h after the onset of estrus. All SMB heifers exhibited estrus within 72 h of implant removal. All heifers had corpora lutea (CL) detected by rectal examination 8 to 12 d following estrus. Serum luteinizing hormone (LH) was not affected by treatment, time (4 - h intervals) or an interaction of treatment by time (P > 0.10). Independent analysis with h indicated that at h 12, SMB (2.2 +/- 0.06 ng/ml) had lower LH than did control heifers (8.9 +/- 2.1 ng/ml). Serum progesterone increased from Day 1 through Day 12 in all heifers, which is indicative of functional CL. Serum progesterone was affected by treatment (P < 0.0001) and time (d intervals; P < 0.10). Progesterone elevation was lower (P < 0.05) and area under the progesterone curve was lower (P < 0.03) in SMB (5.6 +/- 0.5 ng/ml, 32.0 +/- 4.5 units, respectively) when compared with control heifers (7.0 +/- 4 ng/ml, 43.7 +/- 2.4 units, respectively). Conception rate was lower (P < 0.01) in SMB heifers (2 of 11) than in control heifers (8 of 11). The lowered conception rate in SMB treated Brahman heifers may be due to altered timing of LH release following estrus, resulting in an altered time of ovulation.     

Close synchrony of ovulation in superstimulated heifers that have a downregulated anterior pituitary gland and are induced to ovulate with exogenous LH

The synchrony of ovulation was examined in superstimulated heifers that had a downregulated pituitary gland and which were induced to ovulate by injection of exogenous LH. The pituitary was downregulated and desensitized to GnRH by treatment with the GnRH agonist deslorelin. Nulliparous heifers (3.5 yr old) at random stages of the estrous cycle were assigned to 1 of 3 groups, and on Day -7 received the following treatments: Group 1 (control, n = 8), 1 norgestomet ear implant; Group 2 (GnRH agonist, n = 8); Group 3 (GnRH agonist-LH protocol, n = 8), 2 deslorelin ear implants. Ovarian follicle growth in all heifers was superstimulated with twice-daily intramuscular injections of FSH (Folltropin-V): Day O, 40 mg (80 mg total dose); Day 1, 30 mg; Day 2; 20 mg; Day 3, 10 mg. On Day 2, all heifers were given a luteolytic dose of PGF (7 A.M.), Norgestomet implants were removed from heifers in Group 1 (6 P.M.). Heifers in Group 3 were given an injection of 25 mg, i.m. porcine LH (Lutropin) on Day 4 (4 P.M.). Ovarian follicle status was monitored at 8-h intervals from Day 3 (8 A.M.) to Day 6 (4 P.M.) using an Aloka Echo Camera and 7.5 MHz transducer. Heifers in Groups 2 and 3 exhibited estrus earlier (P < 0.05) than heifers in Group 1. Heifers in Group 2 did not have a preovulatory LH surge and they did not ovulate. Individual control heifers in Group 1 ovulated between 12 A.M. on Day 5 and 8 A.M. on Day 6. Heifers with deslorelin implants and injected with LH in Group 3 ovulated between 4 P.M. on Day 5 and 8 A.M. on Day 6. It was confirmed that superstimulated heifers with GnRH agonist implants can be induced to ovulate with LH. It was also demonstrated that ovulation is closely synchronized after injection of LH. Thus, a single, fixed-time insemination schedule could be used in a GnRH agonist-LH superovulation protocol, with significant practical and economic advantages for superovulation and embryo transfer programs.     

Use of a GnRH agonist to prevent the endogenous LH surge and injection of exogenous LH to induce ovulation in heifers superstimulated with FSH: a new model for superovulation

A new protocol for superovulating cattle which allows for control of the timing of ovulation after superstimulation with FSH was developed. The preovulatory LH surge was blocked with the GnRH agonist deslorelin, and ovulation was induced by injection of LH. In Experiment 1, heifers (3-yr-old) were assigned to a control group (Group 1A, n = 4) or a group with deslorelin implants (Group 1B, n = 5). On Day -7, heifers in Group 1A received a progestagen CIDR-B((R))device, while heifers in Group 1B received a CIDR-B((R))device + deslorelin implants. Both groups were superstimulated with twice daily injections of FSH (Folltropin((R))-V): Day 0, 40 mg (80 mg total dose on Day 0); Day 1, 30 mg; Day 2, 20 mg; Day 3, 10 mg. On Day 2, heifers were given PGF (a.m.) and CIDR-B((R)) devices were removed (p.m.). Three heifers in Group 1A had a LH surge and ovulated, whereas neither of these events occurred in Group 1B (with deslorelin implants) heifers. In Experiment 2, heifers (3-yr-old) were assigned to 1 of 4 equal groups (n = 6). On Day -7, heifers in Group 2A received a norgestomet implant, while heifers in Groups 2B, 2C and 2D received norgestomet + deslorelin implants. Heifers were superstimulated with FSH starting on Day 0 as in Experiment 1. On Day 2, heifers were given PGF (a.m.) and norgestomet implants were removed (p.m.). Heifers in Groups 2B to 2D were given 25 mg LH (Lutropin((R))): Group 2B, Day 4 (a.m.); Group 2C, Day 4 (p.m.); Group 2D, Day 5 (a.m.). Heifers in Group 2A were inseminated at estrus and 12 and 24 h later, while heifers in Groups 2B to 2D were inseminated at the time of respective LH injection and 12 and 24 h later. Injection of LH induced ovulation in heifers in Groups 2B to 2D. Heifers in Group 2C had similar total ova and embryos (15.2 +/- 1.4) as heifers in Group 2A (11.0 +/- 2.8) but greater (P < 0.05) numbers than heifers in Group 2B (7.0 +/- 2.3) and Group 2D (6.3 +/- 2.0). The number of transferable embryos was similar for heifers in Group 2A (5.8 +/- 1.8) and Group 2C (7.3 +/- 2.1) but lower (P < 0.05) for heifers in Group 2B (1.2 +/- 0.8) and Group 2D (1.3 +/- 1.0). The new GnRH agonist-LH protocol does not require observation of estrus, and induces ovulation in superstimulated heifers that would not have an endogenous LH surge.     

Use of short-term progestin treatment to resynchronize the second estrus following synchronized breeding in beef heifers

Two trials were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of short-term progestin administration to resynchronize the second estrus after artificial insemination in yearling beef heifers. In Trial 1 crossbred yearling heifers (n = 208) were synchronized with Syncro-Mate-B (SMB) and artificially inseminated (AI) between 48 and 54 h following implant removal. Implant removal is defined as Day 1. Following AI, the heifers were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 experimental groups. Group 1 heifers were fed melengestrol acetate (MGA) daily from Day 17 to 21 at a rate of 0.5 mg/head, while Group 2 control received no exogenous progestin during this period. Synchrony of estrus was defined as the 3-d period in which the highest number of heifers expressed behavioral estrus in each group. There was no difference (P < 0.05) in the pregnancy rate during the second estrus due to MGA supplementation. More MGA-treated heifers (P < 0.01) expressed estrus in a 3-d period than the controls. In Trial 2, yearling heifers (n = 108) were synchronized with 2 injections of PGF(2alpha) (second PGF(2alpha) injection is designated as Day 1) administered 14 d apart with AI 12 h after the onset of behavioral estrus. The heifers were then randomly assigned to 1 of the following 3 treatment groups after initial AI: 1) MGA fed at 0.5 mg/head daily from Days 17 to 21; 2) norgestomet administered in 6.0-mg implants from Days 17 to 21; 3) untreated control heifers. Blood samples were collected on Day 21 and analyzed for progesterone (P(4)). Elevated P(4) (> 1 ng/ml) on Day 21 indicated pregnancy to the first insemination. Synchrony among the 3 groups of heifers was similar (P > 0.10); however, the second estrus was less (P < 0.05) variable in the MGA and norgestomet treated heifers. During the resynchronized second estrus, conception rates were not affected by progestin treatment (MGA 40%, norgestomet 64%, and control 62%; P > 0.10). However, a proportion of heifers treated MGA 10% 4 36 and norgestomet 3% 1 36 expressed behavioral estrus during second estrus even though they were diagnosed as pregnant from first service by elevated P(4) levels on Day 21. We conclude that short-term use of progestin from Days 17 to 21 following AI causes closer synchrony of estrus; however, inseminating pregnant heifers that exhibit behavioral estrus may cause abortion.     

Endocrine responses and estrous activity in Holstein heifers fed supplemental beta-carotene

Three trials involving 56 Holstein heifers were conducted to determine the effect of feeding supplemental beta-carotene (BC) on several reproductive parameters. Heifers were maintained in a loose housing system and group fed year-old brome hay ad libitum. All heifers were individually fed 2.73 kg of a concentrate mix daily. Half of the heifers received 300 mg BC/d (Trials 1 and 2) or 600 mg BC/d (Trial 3) blended in the concentrate mix. After 4 wk of dietary treatment, estrus was synchronized to facilitate observation for estrous activity and collection of blood samples. Two weeks after the treatment was initiated, concentrations of BC in blood serum were greater in the heifers that were fed supplemental BC as compared to control heifers. This difference increased to 6 wk. However, feeding supplemental BC had no effect on any of the reproductive parameters measured, including incidence of estrus and changes in progesterone and luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations after PGF(2alpha), intervals from PGF(2alpha) to estrus and LH peak, estrual activity or first service conception rate. The results indicate that feeding supplemental BC does not alter reproductive performance in Holstein heifers.     

Effects of ovarian input on GnRH and LH secretion immediately postovulation in pony mares

The potential involvement of ovarian factors in regulating GnRH and LH postovulation was studied in ovarian intact (Group 1; n=3) and ovariectomized (OVX; Group 2; n=3) mares (OVX within 12 hr of ovulation). Blood samples were collected every 10 min for 6 hr from jugular vein (JV) and intercavernous sinus (ICS) during estrus and on Day 8 postovulation for LH and GnRH analysis. Additionally, JV samples were collected twice daily (12-hr intervals) for 30 days for LH and progesterone (P4) analysis. A significant treatment x day effect (P<0.0001) describes declining plasma LH concentrations in intact mares, and regression analysis indicated that response curves were not parallel (P<0.001). Plasma LH concentrations remained elevated in OVX mares. LH increased further in OVX mares by Day 8 post-OVX (P<0.06), reflecting the increased (P<0.07) LH episode amplitude. GnRH decreased from estrus to Day 8 in both groups reflecting an effect of sampling period (P<0.03). GnRH episode amplitude declined (P<0.08) from estrus (62.8+/-3.1 pg/mL) to Day 8 (46.3+/-3.1 pg/mL) in OVX mares, but not in control mares (intact estrus, 36.5+/-6.4; intact Day 8, 37.5+/-7.3; OVX estrus, 62.8+/-3.1; OVX Day 8, 46.3+/-3.1 pg/mL). In conclusion, we propose that postovulatory LH decline requires ovarian feedback in mares, and that OVX alters GnRH secretory dynamics such that LH concentrations does not decline postovulation and, in fact, is further elevated with time after OVX.     

Reproductive and metabolic hormones during estrus after fasting in Holstein heifers

The estrous cycles of 23 Holstein heifers were synchronized with three prostaglandin F₂α (PG) injections at 0600 h 11 d apart, designated as Days ?11, 0 and 11. Twelve of the animals were randomly assigned to receive no solid food (Group F) from Day 6 to 14, while the other animals remained on full feed to serve as controls (Group C). Jugular blood samples were collected at 6-h intervals beginning with PG injection at 0600 h on Day 0 until 1800 h on Day 4 and at 0600, 1200 and 1700 h on Day 8 through 10. Samples were collected again at 6-h intervals from PG Day 11 (0600 h) until 1800 h on Day 15. Period 1 was defined as those samples collected from Day 0 through 4.5, Period 2 from Day 7 through 10, Period 3 from Day 11 through 14.25, and Period 4 from Day 14.5 through 15. Plasma growth hormone concentrations were increased (P<0.01) in F as compared with C animals during Periods 2, 3 and 4. Plasma concentrations of prolactin (P<0.01) were decreased in F as compared with C animals during Periods 2 and 3. Plasma urea concentrations were increased (P<0.01) in F as compared with C animals during the first 3 d of the fast (Period 2) but were decreased (P<0.01) during the remainder of the experiment (Periods 3 and 4). Thus, fasting was effective in altering several metabolic parameters. Although plasma progesterone and luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations remained similar (P>0.05) between F and C animals, plasma estradiol-17β concentrations decreased in F as compared with C animals during Periods 2, 3 and 4. No differences (P>0.05) between F and C animals were found in duration to LH peak after PG injection, estrous behavior, or pregnancy rates. Results from this study indicate that fasting reduced plasma estradiol-17β concentrations during estrus but did not alter occurrence of estrus or pregnancy rate.     

Induction of superovulation in cyclic heifers: The inhibitory effect of large doses of PMSG

In two different experiments, superovulation was attempted with a PMSG-PG treatment; a bovine anti-PMSG serum was injected at estrus. After 2500, 5000 and 7500 IU of PMSG injected during the luteal phase, the mean ovulation rates were respectively 16.2 +/- 7.7, 3.2 +/- 2.1, and 1.4 +/- 0.6 in the first experiment (17 heifers) and 18.3 +/- 12.6, 8.5 +/- 8.2, and 2.2 +/- 2.3 in the second (19 heifers). The estradiol-17beta and progesterone patterns and the observations of the ovaries on the day of estrus (Day 0) by ultrasonic echography and on Day 8 by endoscopy show that the ovaries were highly stimulated and suggest that the inhibition observed with the largest doses reflects the absence of the preovulatory LH discharge or its effect.     

Effects of progesterone administered to dairy heifers on sensitivity of corpora lutea to PGF(2)alpha and on plasma LH concentration

To determine whether progesterone facilitates PGF(2)alpha-induced luteolysis prior to day 5 of the estrous cycle, 48 Holstein-Friestian heifers were assigned at random to four treatments: 1) 4 ml corn oil/day + 5 ml Tris-HCl buffer (control); 2) 25 mg prostaglandin F(2)alpha (PGF(2)alpha); 3) 100 mg progesterone/day (progesterone); 4) 100 mg progesterone/day + 25 mg PGF(2)alpha (combined treatment). Progesterone was injected subcutaneously daily from estrus (day 0) through day 3. The PGF(2)alpha was injected intramuscularly on day 3. Estrous cycle lengths were decreased by progesterone: 20.2 +/- 0.56, 19.2 +/- 0.31 (control and PGF(2)alpha); 13.2 +/- 1.40, and 11.7 +/- 1.27 (progesterone and combined). The combination of progesterone and PGF(2)alpha did not shorten the cycle any more than did progesterone alone (interaction, P>0.05). PGF(2)alpha treatment reduced progesterone concentrations on day 6 (P<0.05) and both progesterone and PGF(2)alpha reduced plasma progesterone on day 8 (P<0.01 and P<0.05, respectively). LH was measured in blood samples collected at 10- min intervals for 4 hr on day 4 from three heifers selected at random from each of the four treatment groups. Mean LH concentration for control heifers ranged from 0.35 to 0.63 ng/ml (overall mean, 0.49 ng/ml) and for progesterone-treated heifers ranged from 0.12 to 0.30 ng/ml (overall mean, 0.23 ng/ml). LH concentrations were greater in control heifers (P<0.01). The mean LH pulse rate for control heifers was 2.7 pulses/heifers/4 hr, while that for the progesterone-treated heifers was 1.7 pulses/heifer/4 hr. The mean pulse amplitude for control and progesterone treatments was 0.47 ng/ml and 0.36 ng/ml, respectively. Neither pulse amplitude nor frequency were different between treatment groups.     

The effects of dose and duration of administration of pFSH during the first follicular wave on the ovulation rate of beef heifers

Four experiments were carried out to examine the effects of administration of pFSH (Vetrepharm) from Day 3 of the estrous cycle in conjunction with PG on Day 5 on follicular populations and ovulation rate in heifers. In Experiment 1, 47 heifers were allocated to 1 of 4 treatment groups (n = 11 to 12 per group): a) control, b) 1.5 mg pFSH, c) 2.0 mg pFSH or d) 2.5 mg pFSH until estrus. Heifers assigned to the 3 treatments had a higher ovulation rate than the controls (P < 0.05). In Experiment 2, 45 heifers were allocated to 1 of 5 treatment groups (n = 8 to 10 per group): a) control, b) 1.0 mg pFSH until PG, c) 1.0 mg pFSH until estrus, d) 1.5 mg pFSH until PG or e) 1.5 mg pFSH until estrus. From Day 5, heifers assigned to pFSH treatments had more large follicles than the controls (P < 0.05). There was no effect of treatment on the incidence of twin ovulations. In Experiment 3, 43 heifers were assigned to 1 of 3 groups (n = 11 to 16 per group): a) control, b) 1.0 mg pFSH until estrus or c) 1.5 mg pFSH until estrus. At slaughter, 14 d after administration of PG, the incidence of twin ovulations was 0/11, 7/16 and 8/16 for Groups a, b and c, respectively (P = 0.011). In Experiment 4, pFSH (1.5 mg) was administered to 3 groups during the development of the first dominant follicle: a) growth phase (n = 19); b) static phase (n = 17); and c) decline phase (n = 17). All pFSH-treated heifers had a higher ovulation rate than the controls (P < 0.05); heifers assigned to Group c had a higher ovulation rate than those in Groups a or b (P < 0.05). More heifers assigned to Group c (7/17) superovulated than in the other 2 groups (P < 0.05). In conclusion, administration of 1.0 or 1.5 mg pFSH twice daily beginning at Day 3 of the estrous cycle in association with the induction of luteolysis increased the ovulation rate significantly when pFSH treatment was continued to onset of estrus. The ovulation rate and the occurrence of multiple ovulations were significantly higher when pFSH was administered at the time that the first dominant follicle was in decline.     

Synchronization of estrus in cyclic beef heifers with the prostaglandin analog alfaprostol

Seventy-eight Hereford-Angus crossbred heifers were injected intramuscularly twice with 6 mg of alfaprostol^b in 6 ml of propylene glycol. On each representative day of a 20-day estrous cycle (estrus = Day 0), either three or four heifers received their first injection. The second injection was given 12 days after the first, regardless of the response to the first injection. Thirty-nine heifers were not treated. The first alfaprostol injection reduced serum progesterone to less than 1 ng/ml in all heifers injected after Day 4. A total of 79.5% ($\text{62}\text{78}$) of the heifers exhibited estrus by five days after the first injection. Average interval from injection to estrus was 63 hours. The second injection occurred on Days 6 through 16 for all but one heifer, with 75.6% ($\text{59}\text{78}$) falling on Days 8 through 11 of the estrous cycle. Estrus was detected in 93.6% ($\text{73}\text{78}$) of the heifers within five days after the second injection, with an average interval to estrus of 66 hours.Day of cycle at second injection did not affect the interval to estrus. Conception occurred in 79.4% ($\text{58}\text{73}$) of the heifers inseminated in the five days after the second injection. Occurrence of estrus and conception was no different in treated heifers after five days of the insemination period than in nontreated heifers after 21 days of the insemination period, where 94.9% ($\text{37}\text{39}$) were observed in estrus and 83.8% ($\text{31}\text{37}$) conceived. Overall percent conception for a 55-day insemination period was 89.7 ($\text{70}\text{78}$) for treated and 87.2 ($\text{34}\text{39}$) for nontreated heifers. Day of cycle at first or second injection did not affect conception after the second injection. Some signs of estrus were observed in 11 of the 16 heifers injected before Day 5.A second trial to determine if alfaprostol induced luteolysis early in the cycle was conducted. Twenty purebred Angus, Hereford, or Simmental heifers received either one or two injections of alfaprostol on either Day 1, 2, 3, or 4. Only five heifers showed any signs of estrus, and the three that were inseminated did not conceive. Subsequent cycle length indicated that luteolysis occurred in only one heifer.Data suggest that alfaprostol is an effective luteolytic agent in cyclic beef heifers after Day 4 and that two injections 12 days apart will effectively synchronize estrus in heifers when distributed throughout the cycle at the first injection without affecting conception rate.     

Ovulatory responses and plasma luteinizing hormone concentrations in dairy heifers after treatment with exogenous progesterone and estradiol benzoate

The objectives of this experiment were to determine the effects of 0.5 mg estradiol benzoate, administered intramuscularly 24 h after removal of CIDR-B progesterone containing intravaginal devices, on the time to estrus, ovulation and peak LH concentration in dairy heifers. Ovulatory responses and plasma LH concentrations were examined using 14 Friesian dairy heifers in 2 separate treatment periods. All heifers received a CIDR-B progesterone-containing intravaginal device with an attached 10-mg estradiol benzoate capsule for 12 d. Within each period, 24 h after CIDR-B removal, 7 heifers received an intramuscular injection of 0.5 mg estradiol benzoate while the remaining 7 heifers received an intramuscular injection of a placebo. Blood samples for LH assay were collected at 0, 6 and 12 h, and then every 4 h for 60 h after estradiol injection. Detection of estrus was conducted at 4-h intervals, and ultrasonographical examination to detect ovulation was conducted every 8 h for 88 h after removal of the CIDR-B device. Treatment with estradiol benzoate tended to reduce the time from device removal to the LH peak in Period 1 (median time to LH peak 40.1 vs 63.9 h; P = 6.07). In Period 2, treatment with estradiol had no significant effect on the time to the LH peak, standing estrus or ovulation. We hypothesize that the period effect was due to the stage of cycle at the time of treatment. For heifers treated in Period 1, the stage of cycle was random. However, because of the prior synchronization of estrus, which was implicit in the experimental design, heifers in Period 2 tended to be in late diestrus. The administration of estradiol benzoate after treatment with exogenous progesterone appears to overcome the variability in timing of LH peaks typically occurring in a herd of synchronized heifers due to different stages of follicular development.     

Response to GnRH on day 6 of the estrous cycle is diminished as the percentage of Bos indicus breeding increases in Angus, Brangus, and Brahman x Angus heifers

Angus (n=6), Brangus (5/8 Angus x 3/8 Brahman, n=6), and Brahman x Angus (3/8 Angus x 5/8 Brahman, n=6) heifers exhibiting estrous cycles at regular intervals were used to determine if the percentage of Bos indicus breeding influenced the secretory patterns of LH in response to a GnRH treatment on Day 6 of the estrous cycle. Heifers were pre-synchronized with a two-injection PGF(2 alpha) protocol (25 mg i.m. Day -14 and 12.5 mg i.m. Day -3 and -2 of experiment). Heifers received 100 microg GnRH i.m. on Day 6 of the subsequent estrous cycle. Blood samples were collected at -60, -30, and -1 min before GnRH and 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, and 480 min after GnRH to determine concentrations of serum LH. Estradiol concentrations were determined at -60, -30, and -1 min before GnRH. On Day 6 and 8, ovaries were examined by ultrasonography to determine if ovulation occurred. On Day 13, heifers received 25 mg PGF(2 alpha) i.m. and blood samples were collected daily until either the expression of estrus or Day 20 for heifers not exhibiting estrus to determine progesterone concentrations. There was no effect (P>0.10) of breed on ovulation rate to GnRH as well as size of the largest follicle, mean estradiol, and mean corpus luteum volume at GnRH. Mean LH was greater (P<0.05) for Angus (7.0+/-0.8 ng/mL) compared to Brangus (4.6+/-0.8 ng/mL) and Brahman x Angus (2.9+/-0.8 ng/mL), which were similar (P>0.10). Mean LH peak-height was similar (P>0.10) for Brangus (13.9+/-3.4 ng/mL) compared to Angus (21.9+/-3.4 ng/mL) and Brahman x Angus (8.0+/-3.4 ng/mL), but was greater (P<0.05) for Angus compared to Brahman x Angus. Interval from GnRH to LH peak was similar (P>0.10) between breeds. As the percentage of Bos indicus breeding increased the amount of LH released in response to GnRH on Day 6 of the estrous cycle decreased.     

Exogenous estradiol reduces inhibition of luteinizing hormone by estradiol in prepubertal heifers

The hypothesis that high levels of exogenous estradiol administered to heifers during the prepubertal period would decrease subsequent negative feedback of estradiol on luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion was tested. Fourteen prepubertal heifers were ovariectomized on Day 0. Ovariectomized heifers received either no further treatment (OVX, n = 4), a single estradiol implant on Day 0 (OVXE, n = 5), or the single implant on Day 0 and two additional implants between Days 16 and 30 (OVXE+ E, n = 5). Ten ovary-intact heifers received either no treatment (INT, n = 5) or were administered the two estradiol implants between Days 16 and 30 (INT+ 5, n = 5). Comparison of LH secretion in OVXE to OVXE+E, and in INT to INT+E resulted in significant time-by-treatment interactions (p less than 0.05 for both). As pubertal age approached, mean concentration of LH (p less than 0.05) and pulse frequency (p less than 0.05) increased more rapidly in OVXE+E and INT+E than in OVXE and INT, respectively. Amplitude of LH pulses was unaffected by treatment. When data were standardized to day of puberty in INT and INT+E heifers, mean LH concentration and LH pulse frequency increased as puberty approached in both groups. These data confirm earlier reports indicating that secretion of LH increases gradually as puberty approaches in heifers. It was concluded that administration of estradiol during the prepubertal period hastened the decline in the subsequent negative feedback of estradiol. Precocious puberty was not induced in ovary-intact females.