Adipose Triglyceride Lipase Is Implicated in Fuel- and Non-fuel-stimulated Insulin Secretion

Reduced lipolysis in hormone-sensitive lipase-deficient mice is associated with impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS), suggesting that endogenous β-cell lipid stores provide signaling molecules for insulin release. Measurements of lipolysis and triglyceride (TG) lipase activity in islets from HSL^−/− mice indicated the presence of other TG lipase(s) in the β-cell. Using real time-quantitative PCR, adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) was found to be the most abundant TG lipase in rat islets and INS832/13 cells. To assess its role in insulin secretion, ATGL expression was decreased in INS832/13 cells (ATGL-knockdown (KD)) by small hairpin RNA. ATGL-KD increased the esterification of free fatty acid (FFA) into TG. ATGL-KD cells showed decreased glucose- or Gln + Leu-induced insulin release, as well as reduced response to KCl or palmitate at high, but not low, glucose. The K_ATP-independent/amplification pathway of GSIS was considerably reduced in ATGL-KD cells. ATGL^−/− mice were hypoinsulinemic and hypoglycemic and showed decreased plasma TG and FFAs. A hyperglycemic clamp revealed increased insulin sensitivity and decreased GSIS and arginine-induced insulin secretion in ATGL^−/− mice. Accordingly, isolated islets from ATGL^−/− mice showed reduced insulin secretion in response to glucose, glucose + palmitate, and KCl. Islet TG content and FFA esterification into TG were increased by 2-fold in ATGL^−/− islets, but glucose usage and oxidation were unaltered. The results demonstrate the importance of ATGL and intracellular lipid signaling for fuel- and non-fuel-induced insulin secretion.Free fatty acids (FFA)⁵ and other lipid molecules are important for proper glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) by β-cells. Thus, deprivation of fatty acids (FA) in vivo (1) diminishes GSIS, whereas a short term exposure to FFA enhances it (1–3). In contrast, a sustained provision of FA, particularly in the presence of high glucose in vitro, is detrimental to β-cells in that it reduces insulin gene expression (4) and secretion (5) and induces β-cell apoptosis (6). The FA supply to the β-cells can be from exogenous sources, such as plasma FFAs and lipoproteins, or endogenous sources, such as intracellular triglyceride (TG) stores. Studies from our laboratory (7–10) and others (11, 12) support the concept that the hydrolysis of endogenous TG plays an important role in fuel-induced insulin secretion because TG depletion with leptin (13) or inhibition of TG lipolysis by lipase inhibitors such as 3,5-dimethylpyrazole (7) or orlistat (11, 12) markedly curtail GSIS in rat islets. Furthermore, mice with β-cell-specific knock-out of hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL), which hydrolyzes both TG and diacylglycerol (DAG), show defective first phase GSIS in vivo and in vitro (14).Lipolysis is an integral part of an essential metabolic pathway, the TG/FFA cycle, in which FFA esterification onto a glycerol backbone leading to the synthesis of TG is followed by its hydrolysis with the release of the FFA that can then be re-esterified. Intracellular TG/FFA cycling is known to occur in adipose tissue of rats and humans (15, 16) and also in liver and skeletal muscle (17). It is generally described as a “futile cycle” as it leads to the net hydrolysis of ATP with the generation of heat (18). However, several studies have shown that this cycle has important functions in the cell. For instance, in brown adipose tissue, it contributes to overall thermogenesis (17, 19). In islets from the normoglycemic, hyperinsulinemic, obese Zucker fatty rat, increased GSIS is associated with increased glucose-stimulated lipolysis and FA esterification, indicating enhanced TG/FFA cycling (10). Stimulation of lipolysis by glucose has also been observed in isolated islets from normal rats (12) and HSL^−/− mice (8) indicating the presence of glucose-responsive TG/FFA cycling in pancreatic β-cells.The identity of the key lipases involved in the TG/FFA cycle in pancreatic islets is uncertain. HSL is expressed in islets (20), is up-regulated by long term treatment with elevated glucose (21), and is associated with insulin secretory granules (22). In addition, our earlier results suggested that elevated HSL expression correlates with augmented TG/FFA cycling in islets of Zucker fatty rats (10). However, it appears that other lipases may contribute to lipolysis and the regulation of GSIS in islet tissue. Thus, results from studies using HSL^−/− mice showed unaltered GSIS (8, 23), except in fasted male mice (8, 9) in which lipolysis was decreased but not abolished. Furthermore, HSL^−/− mice show residual TG lipase activity (8) indicating the presence of other TG lipases.Recently, adipocyte triglyceride lipase (ATGL; also known as Desnutrin, TTS-2, iPLA₂-ζ, and PNPLA2) (24–26) was found to account for most if not all of the residual lipolysis in HSL^−/− mice (26, 27). Two homologues of ATGL, Adiponutrin and GS2, have been described in adipocytes (24). All three enzymes contain a patatin-like domain with broad lipid acyl-hydrolase activity. However, it is not known if adiponutrin and GS2 are actually TG hydrolases. An additional lipase, TG hydrolase or carboxylesterase-3, has been identified in rat adipose tissue (28, 29). Although the hydrolysis of TG is catalyzed by all these lipases, HSL can hydrolyze both TG and DAG, the latter being a better substrate (30).In this study, we observed that besides HSL, ATGL (31), adiponutrin, and GS2 are expressed in rat islets and INS832/13 cells, with ATGL being the most abundant. We then focused on the role of ATGL in fuel-stimulated insulin secretion in two models, INS832/13 β-cells in which ATGL expression was reduced by RNA interference-knockdown (ATGL-KD) and ATGL^−/− mice.     

��-Defensins in Enteric Innate Immunity: FUNCTIONAL PANETH CELL ��-DEFENSINS IN MOUSE COLONIC LUMEN*

Paneth cells are a secretory epithelial lineage that release dense core granules rich in host defense peptides and proteins from the base of small intestinal crypts. Enteric α-defensins, termed cryptdins (Crps) in mice, are highly abundant in Paneth cell secretions and inherently resistant to proteolysis. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that enteric α-defensins of Paneth cell origin persist in a functional state in the mouse large bowel lumen. To test this idea, putative Crps purified from mouse distal colonic lumen were characterized biochemically and assayed in vitro for bactericidal peptide activities. The peptides comigrated with cryptdin control peptides in acid-urea-PAGE and SDS-PAGE, providing identification as putative Crps. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry experiments showed that the molecular masses of the putative α-defensins matched those of the six most abundant known Crps, as well as N-terminally truncated forms of each, and that the peptides contain six Cys residues, consistent with identities as α-defensins. N-terminal sequencing definitively revealed peptides with N termini corresponding to full-length, (des-Leu)-truncated, and (des-Leu-Arg)-truncated N termini of Crps 1–4 and 6. Crps from mouse large bowel lumen were bactericidal in the low micromolar range. Thus, Paneth cell α-defensins secreted into the small intestinal lumen persist as intact and functional forms throughout the intestinal tract, suggesting that the peptides may mediate enteric innate immunity in the colonic lumen, far from their upstream point of secretion in small intestinal crypts.Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs)² are released by epithelial cells onto mucosal surfaces as effectors of innate immunity (1–5). In mammals, most AMPs derive from two major families, the cathelicidins and defensins (6). The defensins comprise the α-, β-, and θ-defensin subfamilies, which are defined by the presence of six cysteine residues paired in characteristic tridisulfide arrays (7). α-Defensins are highly abundant in two primary cell lineages: phagocytic leukocytes, primarily neutrophils, of myeloid origin and Paneth cells, which are secretory epithelial cells located at the base of the crypts of Lieberkühn in the small intestine (8–10). Neutrophil α-defensins are stored in azurophilic granules and contribute to non-oxidative microbial cell killing in phagolysosomes (11, 12), except in mice whose neutrophils lack defensins (13). In the small bowel, α-defensins and other host defense proteins (14–18) are released apically as components of Paneth cell secretory granules in response to cholinergic stimulation and after exposure to bacterial antigens (19). Therefore, the release of Paneth cell products into the crypt lumen is inferred to protect mitotically active crypt cells from colonization by potential pathogens and confer protection against enteric infection (7, 20, 21).Under normal, homeostatic conditions, Paneth cells are not found outside the small bowel, although they may appear ectopically in response to local inflammation throughout the gastrointestinal tract (22, 23). Paneth cell numbers increase progressively throughout the small intestine, occurring at highest numbers in the distal ileum (24). Mouse Paneth cells express numerous α-defensin isoforms, termed cryptdins (Crps) (25), that have broad spectrum antimicrobial activities (6, 26). Collectively, α-defensins constitute approximately seventy percent of the bactericidal peptide activity in mouse Paneth cell secretions (19), selectively killing bacteria by membrane-disruptive mechanisms (27–30). The role of Paneth cell α-defensins in gastrointestinal mucosal immunity is evident from studies of mice transgenic for human enteric α-defensin-5, HD-5, which are immune to infection by orally administered Salmonella enterica sv. typhimurium (S. typhimurium) (31).The biosynthesis of mature, bactericidal α-defensins from their inactive precursors requires activation by lineage-specific proteolytic convertases. In mouse Paneth cells, inactive ∼8.4-kDa Crp precursors are processed intracellularly into microbicidal ∼4-kDa Crps by specific cleavage events mediated by matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) (32, 33). MMP-7 null mice exhibit increased susceptibility to systemic S. typhimurium infection and decreased clearance of orally administered non-invasive Escherichia coli (19, 32). Although the α-defensin proregions are sensitive to proteolysis, the mature, disulfide-stabilized peptides resist digestion by their converting enzymes in vitro, whether the convertase is MMP-7 (32), trypsin (34), or neutrophil serine proteinases (35). Because α-defensins resist proteolysis in vitro, we hypothesized that Paneth cell α-defensins resist degradation and remain in a functional state in the large bowel, a complex, hostile environment containing varied proteases of both host and microbial origin.Here, we report on the isolation and characterization of a population of enteric α-defensins from the mouse colonic lumen. Full-length and N-terminally truncated Paneth cell α-defensins were identified and are abundant in the distal large bowel lumen.     

Assembly of the Fungal SC3 Hydrophobin into Functional Amyloid Fibrils Depends on Its Concentration and Is Promoted by Cell Wall Polysaccharides

Class I hydrophobins function in fungal growth and development by self-assembling at hydrophobic-hydrophilic interfaces into amyloid-like fibrils. SC3 of the mushroom-forming fungus Schizophyllum commune is the best studied class I hydrophobin. This protein spontaneously adopts the amyloid state at the water-air interface. In contrast, SC3 is arrested in an intermediate conformation at the interface between water and a hydrophobic solid such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE; Teflon). This finding prompted us to study conditions that promote assembly of SC3 into amyloid fibrils. Here, we show that SC3 adopts the amyloid state at the water-PTFE interface at high concentration (300 μg ml⁻¹) and prolonged incubation (16 h). Moreover, we show that amyloid formation at both the water-air and water-PTFE interfaces is promoted by the cell wall components schizophyllan (β(1–3),β(1–6)-glucan) and β(1–3)-glucan. Hydrophobin concentration and cell wall polysaccharides thus contribute to the role of SC3 in formation of aerial hyphae and in hyphal attachment.Hydrophobins are a class of surface active proteins that play diverse roles in fungal growth and development. For instance, they allow fungi to escape an aqueous environment, confer hydrophobicity to fungal surfaces in contact with air, and mediate attachment of fungi to hydrophobic surfaces (1, 2). They also play a role in the architecture of the cell wall (3).Hydrophobins share eight conserved cysteine residues, but otherwise their sequences are diverse (4). Class I and II hydrophobins are distinguished on the basis of differences in hydropathy patterns and biophysical properties (5). SC3 of Schizophyllum commune is the best characterized class I hydrophobin. It self-assembles at interfaces between water and air, water and oil, and water and hydrophobic solids (6–8). The four disulfide bridges of SC3 prevent spontaneous self-assembly in solution and thus account for the controlled assembly at hydrophobic-hydrophilic interfaces (9).The water-soluble form of SC3 is oligomeric (10) and rich in β-sheet (11). Upon assembly at the water-air interface, SC3 proceeds via an intermediate form that has increased α-helical structure (α-helical state) to a stable end form that has increased β-sheet structure (β-sheet state) (11–13). SC3 in the β-sheet state initially has no clear ultrastructure (β-sheet I state) (12), but after prolonged incubation, the protein forms 10-nm wide amyloid-like fibrils (β-sheet II state) (12–14) that are called rodlets (6, 15). Like other amyloid fibrils (16), rodlets of the hydrophobins SC3 of S. commune and EAS of Neurospora crassa increase fluorescence of thioflavin T and bind Congo red (14, 17, 18). Moreover, x-ray diffraction of rodlets of EAS showed reflections at 4.8 Å (distance between strands in a β-sheet) and 10–12 Å (spacing between β-sheets stacked perpendicular to the fibril long axis) (19), which are indicative for amyloid fibrils.Notably, SC3 does not spontaneously self-assemble into amyloid fibrils at an interface between water and a hydrophobic solid. Instead, SC3 is arrested in the intermediate α-helical state. Transition to the β-sheet state is observed only by heating the sample in the presence of detergent (11, 12). These observations prompted us to study conditions that promote assembly of SC3 into amyloid fibrils. Here, we show that amyloid formation of SC3 is promoted by increasing its concentration or by the presence of cell wall polysaccharides.     

Skeletal Muscle AMP-activated Protein Kinase Is Essential for the Metabolic Response to Exercise in Vivo

AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) has been postulated as a super-metabolic regulator, thought to exert numerous effects on skeletal muscle function, metabolism, and enzymatic signaling. Despite these assertions, little is known regarding the direct role(s) of AMPK in vivo, and results obtained in vitro or in situ are conflicting. Using a chronically catheterized mouse model (carotid artery and jugular vein), we show that AMPK regulates skeletal muscle metabolism in vivo at several levels, with the result that a deficit in AMPK activity markedly impairs exercise tolerance. Compared with wild-type littermates at the same relative exercise capacity, vascular glucose delivery and skeletal muscle glucose uptake were impaired; skeletal muscle ATP degradation was accelerated, and arterial lactate concentrations were increased in mice expressing a kinase-dead AMPKα2 subunit (α2-KD) in skeletal muscle. Nitric-oxide synthase (NOS) activity was significantly impaired at rest and in response to exercise in α2-KD mice; expression of neuronal NOS (NOSμ) was also reduced. Moreover, complex I and IV activities of the electron transport chain were impaired 32 ± 8 and 50 ± 7%, respectively, in skeletal muscle of α2-KD mice (p < 0.05 versus wild type), indicative of impaired mitochondrial function. Thus, AMPK regulates neuronal NOSμ expression, NOS activity, and mitochondrial function in skeletal muscle. In addition, these results clarify the role of AMPK in the control of muscle glucose uptake during exercise. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that AMPK is central to substrate metabolism in vivo, which has important implications for exercise tolerance in health and certain disease states characterized by impaired AMPK activation in skeletal muscle.The ubiquitously expressed serine/threonine AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)² is an αβγ heterotrimer postulated to play a key role in the response to energetic stress (1, 2), because of its sensitivity to increased cellular AMP levels (3). Pharmacological activation of AMPK (primarily via the AMP analogue ZMP) increases catabolic processes such as GLUT4 translocation (4, 5), glucose uptake (6, 7), long chain fatty acid (LCFA) uptake (8), and substrate oxidation (6). Concomitantly, pharmacological activation of AMPK inhibits anabolic processes, and in skeletal muscle genetic reduction of the catalytic AMPKα2 subunit eliminates these pharmacological effects (9–12). Thus, AMPK has been proposed to act as a metabolic master switch (2, 13, 14). Physiologically, exercise at intensities sufficient to increase free cytosolic AMP (AMP_free) levels is a potent stimulus of AMPK, preferentially activating AMPKα2 in skeletal muscle (15–17). The metabolic profile of skeletal muscle during moderate to high intensity exercise is remarkably similar to skeletal muscle in which AMPK has been pharmacologically activated (i.e. increases in catabolic processes). This is consistent with the hypothesis that AMPK activation is required for the metabolic response to increased cellular stress. Given this, it is surprising that the direct role(s) of skeletal muscle AMPK during exercise under physiological in vivo conditions is unknown.A number of studies have tried to attribute causality to the AMPK and metabolic responses to exercise using transgenic models. In mouse models in which AMPKα2 protein expression and/or activity has been impaired, contractions performed in isolated skeletal muscle in vitro, ex vivo, or in situ have demonstrated that skeletal muscle glucose uptake (MGU) is normal (9, 10), partially impaired (11, 18), or ablated (19). Furthermore, ex vivo skeletal muscle LCFA uptake and oxidation in response to contraction appears to be AMPK-independent (20, 21). A key limitation of these studies is that the experimental models were not physiological. Under in vivo conditions, mice expressing a kinase-dead (18) or inactive (22) AMPKα2 subunit in cardiac and skeletal muscle have impaired voluntary and maximal physical activity, respectively, indicative of a physiological role for AMPK during exercise. In this context, obese non-diabetic and diabetic individuals have impaired skeletal muscle AMPK activation during moderate intensity exercise (23) as well as during the post-exercise period (24), yet the contribution of this impairment to the disease state is unclear. Thus, in vivo studies are essential to define the role of AMPK in skeletal muscle during exercise.Physical exercise of a moderate intensity is an effective adjunct treatment for chronic metabolic diseases such as obesity and type 2 diabetes (25). Given the importance of elucidating the molecular mechanism(s) regulating skeletal muscle substrate metabolism during exercise and the putative role of AMPK as a critical mediator in this process, we tested the hypothesis that AMPKα2 is functionally linked to substrate metabolism in vivo.     

Molecular Interplay between Endostatin, Integrins, and Heparan Sulfate

Endostatin is an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis. Although several endothelial cell surface molecules have been reported to interact with endostatin, its molecular mechanism of action is not fully elucidated. We used surface plasmon resonance assays to characterize interactions between endostatin, integrins, and heparin/heparan sulfate. α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins form stable complexes with immobilized endostatin (K_D = ∼1.8 × 10⁻⁸ m, two-state model). Two arginine residues (Arg²⁷ and Arg¹³⁹) are crucial for the binding of endostatin to integrins and to heparin/heparan sulfate, suggesting that endostatin would not bind simultaneously to integrins and to heparan sulfate. Experimental data and molecular modeling support endostatin binding to the headpiece of the αvβ3 integrin at the interface between the β-propeller domain of the αv subunit and the βA domain of the β3 subunit. In addition, we report that α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins bind to heparin/heparan sulfate. The ectodomain of the α5β1 integrin binds to haparin with high affinity (K_D = 15.5 nm). The direct binding between integrins and heparin/heparan sulfate might explain why both heparan sulfate and α5β1 integrin are required for the localization of endostatin in endothelial cell lipid rafts.Endostatin is an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis that inhibits proliferation and migration of endothelial cells (1–3). This C-fragment of collagen XVIII has also been shown to inhibit 65 different tumor types and appears to down-regulate pathological angiogenesis without side effects (2). Endostatin regulates angiogenesis by complex mechanisms. It modulates embryonic vascular development by enhancing proliferation, migration, and apoptosis (4). It also has a biphasic effect on the inhibition of endothelial cell migration in vitro, and endostatin therapy reveals a U-shaped curve for antitumor activity (5, 6). Short term exposure of endothelial cells to endostatin may be proangiogenic, unlike long term exposure, which is anti-angiogenic (7). The effect of endostatin depends on its concentration and on the type of endothelial cells (8). It exerts the opposite effects on human umbilical vein endothelial cells and on endothelial cells derived from differentiated embryonic stem cells. Furthermore, two different mechanisms (heparin-dependent and heparin-independent) may exist for the anti-proliferative activity of endostatin depending on the growth factor used to induce cell proliferation (fibroblast growth factor 2 or vascular endothelial growth factor). Its anti-proliferative effect on endothelial cells stimulated by fibroblast growth factor 2 is mediated by the binding of endostatin to heparan sulfate (9), whereas endostatin inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis independently of its ability to bind heparin and heparan sulfate (9, 10). The broad range of molecular targets of endostatin suggests that multiple signaling systems are involved in mediating its anti-angiogenic action (11), and although several endothelial cell surface molecules have been reported to interact with endostatin, its molecular mechanisms of action are not as fully elucidated as they are for other endogenous angiogenesis inhibitors (11).Endostatin binds with relatively low affinity to several membrane proteins including α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins (12), heparan sulfate proteoglycans (glypican-1 and -4) (13), and KDR/Flk1/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (14), but no high affinity receptor(s) has been identified so far. The identification of molecular interactions established by endostatin at the cell surface is a first step toward the understanding of the mechanisms by which endostatin regulates angiogenesis. We have previously characterized the binding of endostatin to heparan sulfate chains (9). In the present study we have focused on characterizing the interactions between endostatin, α5β1, αvβ3, and αvβ5 integrins and heparan sulfate. Although interactions between several integrins and endostatin have been studied previously in solid phase assays (12) and in cell models (12, 15, 16), no molecular data are available on the binding site of endostatin to the integrins. We found that two arginine residues of endostatin (Arg²⁷ and Arg¹³⁹) participate in binding to integrins and to heparan sulfate, suggesting that endostatin is not able to bind simultaneously to these molecules displayed at the cell surface. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that α5β1, αvβ3, and αvβ5 integrins bind to heparan sulfate. This may explain why both heparan sulfate and α5β1 integrins are required for the localization of endostatin in lipid rafts, in support of the model proposed by Wickström et al. (15).     

Proinsulin and the Genetics of Diabetes Mellitus

Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.     

PR55��, a Regulatory Subunit of PP2A, Specifically Regulates PP2A-mediated ��-Catenin Dephosphorylation

A central question in Wnt signaling is the regulation of β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. Multiple kinases, including CKIα and GSK3, are involved in β-catenin phosphorylation. Protein phosphatases such as PP2A and PP1 have been implicated in the regulation of β-catenin. However, which phosphatase dephosphorylates β-catenin in vivo and how the specificity of β-catenin dephosphorylation is regulated are not clear. In this study, we show that PP2A regulates β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation in vivo. We demonstrate that PP2A is required for Wnt/β-catenin signaling in Drosophila. Moreover, we have identified PR55α as the regulatory subunit of PP2A that controls β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. PR55α, but not the catalytic subunit, PP2Ac, directly interacts with β-catenin. RNA interference knockdown of PR55α elevates β-catenin phosphorylation and decreases Wnt signaling, whereas overexpressing PR55α enhances Wnt signaling. Taken together, our results suggest that PR55α specifically regulates PP2A-mediated β-catenin dephosphorylation and plays an essential role in Wnt signaling.Wnt/β-catenin signaling plays essential roles in development and tumorigenesis (1–3). Our previous work found that β-catenin is sequentially phosphorylated by CKIα⁴ and GSK3 (4), which creates a binding site for β-Trcp (5), leading to degradation via the ubiquitination/proteasome machinery (3). Mutations in β-catenin or APC genes that prevent β-catenin phosphorylation or ubiquitination/degradation lead ultimately to cancer (1, 2).In addition to the involvement of kinases, protein phosphatases, such as PP1, PP2A, and PP2C, are also implicated in Wnt/β-catenin regulation. PP2C and PP1 may regulate dephosphorylation of Axin and play positive roles in Wnt signaling (6, 7). PP2A is a multisubunit enzyme (8–10); it has been reported to play either positive or negative roles in Wnt signaling likely by targeting different components (11–21). Toward the goal of understanding the mechanism of β-catenin phosphorylation, we carried out siRNA screening targeting several major phosphatases, in which we found that PP2A dephosphorylates β-catenin. This is consistent with a recent study where PP2A is shown to dephosphorylate β-catenin in a cell-free system (18).PP2A consists of a catalytic subunit (PP2Ac), a structure subunit (PR65/A), and variable regulatory B subunits (PR/B, PR/B′, PR/B″, or PR/B‴). The substrate specificity of PP2A is thought to be determined by its B subunit (9). By siRNA screening, we further identified that PR55α, a regulatory subunit of PP2A, specifically regulates β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. Mechanistically, we found that PR55α directly interacts with β-catenin and regulates PP2A-mediated β-catenin dephosphorylation in Wnt signaling.     

Loop 2 Structure in Glycine and GABAA Receptors Plays a Key Role in Determining Ethanol Sensitivity

The present study tests the hypothesis that the structure of extracellular domain Loop 2 can markedly affect ethanol sensitivity in glycine receptors (GlyRs) and γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA_ARs). To test this, we mutated Loop 2 in the α1 subunit of GlyRs and in the γ subunit of α1β2γ2GABA_ARs and measured the sensitivity of wild type and mutant receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes to agonist, ethanol, and other agents using two-electrode voltage clamp. Replacing Loop 2 of α1GlyR subunits with Loop 2 from the δGABA_AR (δL2), but not the γGABA_AR subunit, reduced ethanol threshold and increased the degree of ethanol potentiation without altering general receptor function. Similarly, replacing Loop 2 of the γ subunit of GABA_ARs with δL2 shifted the ethanol threshold from 50 mm in WT to 1 mm in the GABA_A γ-δL2 mutant. These findings indicate that the structure of Loop 2 can profoundly affect ethanol sensitivity in GlyRs and GABA_ARs. The δL2 mutations did not affect GlyR or GABA_AR sensitivity, respectively, to Zn²⁺ or diazepam, which suggests that these δL2-induced changes in ethanol sensitivity do not extend to all allosteric modulators and may be specific for ethanol or ethanol-like agents. To explore molecular mechanisms underlying these results, we threaded the WT and δL2 GlyR sequences onto the x-ray structure of the bacterial Gloeobacter violaceus pentameric ligand-gated ion channel homologue (GLIC). In addition to being the first GlyR model threaded on GLIC, the juxtaposition of the two structures led to a possible mechanistic explanation for the effects of ethanol on GlyR-based on changes in Loop 2 structure.Alcohol abuse and dependence are significant problems in our society, with ∼14 million people in the United States being affected (1, 2). Alcohol causes over 100,000 deaths in the United States, and alcohol-related issues are estimated to cost nearly 200 billion dollars annually (2). To address this, considerable attention has focused on the development of medications to prevent and treat alcohol-related problems (3–5). The development of such medications would be aided by a clear understanding of the molecular structures on which ethanol acts and how these structures influence receptor sensitivity to ethanol.Ligand-gated ion channels (LGICs)² have received substantial attention as putative sites of ethanol action that cause its behavioral effects (6–12). Research in this area has focused on investigating the effects of ethanol on two large superfamilies of LGICs: 1) the Cys-loop superfamily of LGICs (13, 14), whose members include nicotinic acetylcholine, 5-hydroxytryptamine₃, γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA_A), γ-aminobutyric acid type C, and glycine receptors (GlyRs) (10, 11, 15–20) and 2) the glutamate superfamily, including N-methyl d-aspartate, α-amino-3-hydroxyisoxazolepropionic acid, and kainate receptors (21, 22). Recent studies have also begun investigating ethanol action in the ATP-gated P2X superfamily of LGICs (23–25).A series of studies that employed chimeric and mutagenic strategies combined with sulfhydryl-specific labeling identified key regions within Cys-loop receptors that appear to be initial targets for ethanol action that also can determine the sensitivity of the receptors to ethanol (7–12, 18, 19, 26–30). This work provides several lines of evidence that position 267 and possibly other sites in the transmembrane (TM) domain of GlyRs and homologous sites in GABA_ARs are targets for ethanol action and that mutations at these sites can influence ethanol sensitivity (8, 9, 26, 31).Growing evidence from GlyRs indicates that ethanol also acts on the extracellular domain. The initial findings came from studies demonstrating that α1GlyRs are more sensitive to ethanol than are α2GlyRs despite the high (∼78%) sequence homology between α1GlyRs and α2GlyRs (32). Further work found that an alanine to serine exchange at position 52 (A52S) in Loop 2 can eliminate the difference in ethanol sensitivity between α1GlyRs and α2GlyRs (18, 20, 33). These studies also demonstrated that mutations at position 52 in α1GlyRS and the homologous position 59 in α2GlyRs controlled the sensitivity of these receptors to a novel mechanistic ethanol antagonist (20). Collectively, these studies suggest that there are multiple sites of ethanol action in α1GlyRs, with one site located in the TM domain (e.g. position 267) and another in the extracellular domain (e.g. position 52).Subsequent studies revealed that the polarity of the residue at position 52 plays a key role in determining the sensitivity of GlyRs to ethanol (20). The findings with polarity in the extracellular domain contrast with the findings at position 267 in the TM domain, where molecular volume, but not polarity, significantly affected ethanol sensitivity (9). Taken together, these findings indicate that the physical-chemical parameters of residues at positions in the extracellular and TM domains that modulate ethanol effects and/or initiate ethanol action in GlyRs are not uniform. Thus, knowledge regarding the physical-chemical properties that control agonist and ethanol sensitivity is key for understanding the relationship between the structure and the actions of ethanol in LGICs (19, 31, 34–40).GlyRs and GABA_ARs, which differ significantly in their sensitivities to ethanol, offer a potential method for identifying the structures that control ethanol sensitivity. For example, α1GlyRs do not reliably respond to ethanol concentrations less than 10 mm (32, 33, 41). Similarly, γ subunit-containing GABA_ARs (e.g. α1β2γ2), the most predominantly expressed GABA_ARs in the central nervous system, are insensitive to ethanol concentrations less than 50 mm (42, 43). In contrast, δ subunit-containing GABA_ARs (e.g. α4β3δ) have been shown to be sensitive to ethanol concentrations as low as 1–3 mm (44–51). Sequence alignment of α1GlyR, γGABA_AR, and δGABA_AR revealed differences between the Loop 2 regions of these receptor subunits. Since prior studies found that mutations of Loop 2 residues can affect ethanol sensitivity (19, 20, 39), the non-conserved residues in Loop 2 of GlyR and GABA_AR subunits could provide the physical-chemical and structural bases underlying the differences in ethanol sensitivity between these receptors.The present study tested the hypothesis that the structure of Loop 2 can markedly affect the ethanol sensitivity of GlyRs and GABA_ARs. To accomplish this, we performed multiple mutations that replaced the Loop 2 region of the α1 subunit in α1GlyRs and the Loop 2 region of the γ subunit of α1β2γ2 GABA_ARs with corresponding non-conserved residues from the δ subunit of GABA_AR and tested the sensitivity of these receptors to ethanol. As predicted, replacing Loop 2 of WT α1GlyRs with the homologous residues from the δGABA_AR subunit (δL2), but not the γGABA_AR subunit (γL2), markedly increased the sensitivity of the receptor to ethanol. Similarly, replacing the non-conserved residues of the γ subunit of α1β2γ2 GABA_ARs with δL2 also markedly increased ethanol sensitivity of GABA_ARs. These findings support the hypothesis and suggest that Loop 2 may play a role in controlling ethanol sensitivity across the Cys-loop superfamily of receptors. The findings also provide the basis for suggesting structure-function relationships in a new molecular model of the GlyR based on the bacterial Gloeobacter violaceus pentameric LGIC homologue (GLIC).