Catechol-<Emphasis Type="Italic">O</Emphasis>-methyltransferase (COMT) Val158Met polymorphism and risk of osteoporotic fracture

Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) is an estrogen degrading enzyme. The COMT Val158Met polymorphism is associated with bone mineral density. The aim of this study was to investigate associations between COMT Val158Met and osteoporotic fractures in Chinese Han patients. Case-control study of 320 patients with osteoporotic fractures and 320 healthy controls were conducted. The COMT Val158Met polymorphism was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay. Patients with osteoporotic fracture had a significantly lower frequency of Val/Val genotype [odds ratio (OR) = 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39–0.99, P = 0.04] than controls. When stratified by the fracture type, there was a significantly lower frequency of Val/Val genotype in patients with vertebral fracture (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.36–0.94, P = 0.03) than controls. There was no significant difference in the distribution of each genotype between patients with hip fracture and the control group. Our findings suggest that COMT Val/Val genotype was associated with a lower risk of osteoporotic fracture in Chinese population, especially to vertebral fracture.     

The associations between the Val158Met in the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene and the risk of uterine leiomyoma (ULM)

The Val158Met polymorphism of the COMT gene has been implicated in susceptibility to uterine leiomyoma (ULM), but the reported results were inconclusive. The aim of the study was to evaluate the Val158Met polymorphism of the COMT gene and the risk of ULM by meta-analysis. A comprehensive electronic search for relevant articles was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang, and Weipu databases. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Revman4.2 software and Stata10.0 software. A total of 7 articles including 12 case–control studies were identified in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the polymorphism was associated with decreased risk of ULM (Met/Met + Val/Met vs. Met/Met: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–0.99, Z = 2.07, p = 0.04). In the subgroup analyses by ethnicity, significant decreased risk was found among the black populations (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.48–0.97, Z = 2.15, p = 0.03). The current meta-analysis suggested that the Val158Met polymorphism in the COMT gene was associated with decreased risk of ULM, especially in the black population. Future studies are needed to validate our conclusions.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">FAS</Emphasis> −1,377 G/A polymorphism is associated with cancer susceptibility: evidence from 10,564 cases and 12,075 controls

Published data on the association between FAS −1,377 G/A polymorphism and cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of 17 studies including 10,564 cases and 12,075 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, significantly elevated cancer risk was associated with AA variant genotype when all the eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (for AA vs GG: OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.01–1.40; P _{heterogeneity} = 0.05; for recessive model: OR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.04–1.41; P _{heterogeneity} = 0.05). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, borderline statistically significantly increased risks were found among Asians for recessive model (OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.00–1.45; P _{heterogeneity} = 0.01). In the subgroup analysis by population-based controls or hospital-based controls, statistically significantly increased risks were found among groups with population-based controls for AA versus GG (OR = 1.27; 95% CI = 1.02–1.58; P _{heterogeneity} = 0.05) and recessive model (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.00–1.59; P _{heterogeneity} = 0.01). For breast cancer, borderline statistically significantly increased risks were found for AA versus GG (OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.00–1.67; P _{heterogeneity} = 0.41). In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that the FAS −1,377 G/A polymorphism is associated with cancer susceptibility. L. X. Qiu, J. Shi and H. Yuan contributed equally to this work and should be considered as co-first authors.     

The l58Val/Met polymorphism of catechol-O-methyl transferase gene and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis

The association between COMT Val158Met polymorphism and prostate cancer has been evaluated. However, the results of these studies on the association remain conflicting. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A comprehensive search was conducted to identify the eligible studies of COMT Val158Met polymorphism and prostate cancer risk. Summary odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) for COMT Val158Met polymorphism and prostate cancer were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with the software program Review Manage (Version 5.0) and Stata (Version 12.0). Six case–control studies, totally 4,118 persons including 2,143 cases and 1,975 controls, met the included criteria and thus were selected. Our analysis suggested that Val158Met polymorphism was associated with prostate cancer risk in overall population. Collectively, the results of the present study suggest that significant associations of COMT Val158Met polymorphisms with prostate cancer were observed (for additive model: OR = 1.068, 95 % CI = 1.002–1.138, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.363, P = 0.043; for dominant model: OR = 1.266, 95 % CI = 1.057–1.517, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.000, P = 0.011; for recessive model: OR = 1.050, 95 % CI = 0.961–1.146, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.558, P = 0.279; and Val allele versus Met allele OR = 0.932, 95 % CI = 0.894–0.971, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.272, P = 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, we detected no significant association between the COMT 158 Val/Met genotype and prostate cancer risk in Caucasian and Asian populations, while the contrary result for additive model (OR = 2.43, 95 % CI = 1.08–5.43, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.04, P = 0.03) in Asian populations. The result of this meta-analysis suggests that COMT l58Val/Met polymorphism might be contributed to the overall prostate cancer risk.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">TGFBR1</Emphasis>*6A/9A polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 13,662 cases and 14,147 controls

Published data on the association between TGFBR1*6A/9A polymorphism and cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of 32 studies including 13,662 cases and 14,147 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, significantly elevated cancer risks were associated with TGFBR1*6A in all genetic models (for allelic effect: OR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.03–1.21; for 6A/6A vs. 9A/9A: OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.01–1.69; for 9A/6A vs. 9A/9A: OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.01–1.15; for dominant model: OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.02–1.15; for recessive model: OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.00–1.68). In the subgroup analysis by cancer types, significant associations were found in breast cancer (for allelic effect: OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.01–1.34) and ovarian cancer (for allelic effect: OR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.00–1.54; for 6A/6A vs. 9A/9A: OR = 2.34; 95% CI = 1.03–5.33). However, no significant associations were found in colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, prostate cancer and lung cancer for all genetic models. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that the TGFBR1*6A/9A polymorphism is associated with cancer susceptibility, increasing the risk of breast and ovarian cancer.     

Association between ATM 5557G>A polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between ATM 5557G>A (p.D1853N) polymorphism and breast cancer risk. However, the results remain conflicting rather than conclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, we performed this meta-analysis. Systematic searches of PubMed and Medline databases were performed. A total of nine studies included 3155 cases and 2752 controls were identified. When all nine studies were pooled into the meta-analysis, there was no evidence for significant association between 5557G>A mutation and breast cancer risk(for G/A vs. G/G: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.83–1.34; for A/A vs. G/G: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.58–1.03; for dominant model: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.82–1.31; for recessive model: OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.69–1.09). In the subgroup analyses by family history and ethnicity, significant associations were found among Amerindians (for G/A vs. G/G: OR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.38–3.47; for dominant model: OR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.37–3.38). In summary, the meta-analysis suggest that ATM 5557G>A polymorphism is associated with increased breast cancer risk among Amerindians. However, due to the small subjects included in analysis and the selection bias existed in some studies, the results for Amerindians should be interpreted with caution.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">ACE2</Emphasis> gene polymorphism and essential hypertension: an updated meta-analysis involving 11,051 subjects

The polymorphisms of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) gene have been suggested to be linked to increase risk of essential hypertension in multiple populations. However, the results are still debatable. To assess the association between ACE2 G8970A genetic polymorphism and essential hypertension, we conducted a meta-analysis of case–control studies across different ethnicity. PubMed, Embase, CBM, Wanfang and VIP databases were searched, and a total of 11 separate studies in females and nine separate studies in males met the inclusion criteria. Because ACE2 is on the X chromosome, data for each sex were analyzed separately. The selected studies contained 7,251 (4,472 females/2,779 males) hypertensive patients and 3,800 (2,161 females/1,639 males) normotensive controls. A statistically significant association was observed between the G8970A gene polymorphism and essential hypertension risk in female hypertensive group in the recessive genetic model (AA vs. GG+GA: P = 0.03, OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.02–1.30, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.40, I ² = 5%, fixed-effects model). Although no association was shown between the frequency of the A allele and the genetic susceptibility to essential hypertension in all male patients (A Allele: P = 0.38, OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.89–1.38, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.02, I ² = 56%, random-effects model), we found that the relationship between carrier of A allele and the essential hypertension risk in Han-Chinese male patients subgroup (A Allele: P = 0.006, OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.06–1.38, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.10, I ² = 44%, fixed-effects model). The current meta-analysis provided solid evidence suggesting that ACE2 gene polymorphism G8790A was probably a genetic risk factor for essential hypertension across different ethnic populations in female subjects and in Han-Chinese male subjects.     

CXCL12 G801A polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis

The G801A polymorphism in the CXCL12 gene has been implicated in breast cancer risk. However, the published findings are inconsistent. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to investigate this relationship. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association. The pooled ORs were performed for codominant model, dominant model, and recessive model, respectively. Five published case–control studies, including 1,058 breast cancer cases and 1,023 controls were identified. No study had a deviation from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in controls. We found that the CXCL12 G801A (rs1801157) polymorphism was associated with a significantly increased risk of breast cancer risk when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (codomiant model: AA versus GG, OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.16–2.33; GA versus GG, OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.18–1.71; dominant model: AA/GA versus GG, OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.21–1.72). Furthermore, Egger’s test did not show any evidence of publication bias (P > 0.05 for the dominant model). In conclusion, the results suggest that the CXCL12 G801A polymorphism may be a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast cancer.     

Association of IL-10-1082 promoter polymorphism with susceptibility to gastric cancer: evidence from 22 case–control studies

Evidence suggested that interleukin-10 (IL-10) may be involved in the etiology of gastric cancer (GC). However, epidemiological studies on the association between IL-10-1082 promoter polymorphism and GC risk are still ambiguous. To quantitatively summarize the evidence for such a relationship, we performed a meta-analysis. Systemic searches of the PubMed and Medline databases were performed, with the last report up to July 2011. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of association. 22 independent studies including 4,289 cases and 5,965 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Obvious association was found when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (A vs. G: OR = 0.489, 95% CI = 0.335–0.713, P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, we observed significant associations in Asians (A vs. G: OR = 0.651, 95% CI = 0.506–0.838, P = 0.001; AA vs. GG: OR = 0.482, 95% CI = 0.328–0.709, P < 0.001; AA/AG vs. GG: OR = 0.711, 95% CI = 0.527–0.959, P = 0.025; AA vs. AG/GG: OR = 0.701, 95% CI = 0.520–0.944, P = 0.019) and Caucasians (A vs. G: OR = 0.365, 95% CI = 0.140–0.949, P = 0.039), but not in Latino population. When stratified analysis by control sources, our results indicated that A allele decreased approximately 48% risk among population-based studies (A vs. G: OR = 0.524, 95% CI = 0.374–0.733, P < 0.001). Taken together, this meta-analysis suggests that IL-10-1082 polymorphism is associated with GC risk.     

XPA A23G polymorphism and susceptibility to cancer: a meta-analysis

Xeroderma pigmentosum group A (XPA) participates in modulating recognition of DNA damage during the DNA nucleotide excision repair process. The XPA A23G polymorphism has been investigated in case–control studies to evaluate the cancer risk attributed to the variant, but the results were conflicting. To clarify the effect of XPA A23G polymorphism in cancer risk, we conducted a meta-analysis that included 30 published case–control studies. Overall, no significant association of XPA A23G variant with cancer susceptibility was observed for any genetic model. However, significant association was observed for colorectal cancer (GG vs. AA: OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.15–2.44; dominant genetic model GG + AG vs. AA: OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.08–1.17), for breast cancer an increased but non-significant risk was found (GG vs. AA: OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.98–1.66; dominant genetic model GG + AG vs. AA: OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.99–1.63), and for head and neck cancer an increased risk was observed in recessive model (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.02–1.38), whereas for lung cancer a significant reduced risk was observed (GG vs. AA: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.66–0.90; dominant genetic model GG + AG vs. AA: OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.66–0.87), it’s noting that in Asian population the inverse association was more apparent. In addition, in Asian population for esophageal cancer a significant decreased risk was also found in dominant genetic model (OR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.43–0.70) and for head and neck cancer an increased risk was observed in dominant genetic model (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.03–2.23). The meta-analysis suggested that the XPA A23G G allele is a low-penetrant risk factor for cancer development.     

The Ku70 ?1310C/G promoter polymorphism is associated with breast cancer susceptibility in Chinese Han population

Ku70 plays an important role in the DSBR (DNA double-strand breaks repair) and maintenance of genomic integrity. Genetic variations within human Ku70 have been demonstrated to be associated with increased risk of several types of cancers. In this hospital-based case–control study, we aimed to investigate whether a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the promoter region (rs2267437) of Ku70 gene is associated with susceptibility to breast cancer in Chinese Han population. A total of 293 patients with breast cancer and 301 age-matched healthy controls were enrolled in this study. The Ku70 −1310C/G polymorphism was determined by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR–RFLP) analysis. A significant difference in genotype distribution and allele frequency was observed between patients and controls. The CG or GG carries were at higher risk of breast cancer compared with the CC homozygotes (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.02–2.00, P = 0.038 and OR = 3.53, 95% CI = 1.60–7.80, P = 0.002, respectively). Further stratification analysis revealed that G allele was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.21–2.33, P = 0.002), but not in postmenopausal women (OR = 1.33, 5% CI = 0.85–2.10, P = 0.216). Our study suggests that the Ku70 −1310C/G promoter polymorphism may be a susceptibility factor for breast cancer in Chinese Han population.     

Quantitative assessment of the effect of MTHFR polymorphisms on the risk of lung carcinoma

Published studies on the relationships between 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms and lung cancer risk have been conflicting. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess the association between MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and lung cancer risk. A total of 15 studies including 10,753 cases and 11,275 controls described C677T genotypes, among which 11 articles totalling 6,161 cases and 7,684 controls described A1298C genotypes, were also involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significantly elevated lung cancer risk was found in any genetic models when all studies were pooled. For C677T polymorphism: (TT vs. CC: OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.97–1.42; TC vs. CC: OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.94–1.20; dominant model: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.96–1.24; and recessive model: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.95–1.24); for A1298C polymorphism: (CC vs. AA: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.91–1.19; AC vs. AA: OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.91–1.06; dominant model: OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.92–1.06; and recessive model: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.92–1.20). In the subgroup analyses, the results showed that 677T varients could decrease lung cancer risk in female (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.41–0.95, P-value = 0.03, 677CC as reference). No evidence of any associations of MTHFR A1298C polymorphism with lung cancer was found in overall or subgroup analyses. Our meta-analysis supports that the common polymorphisms of C677T and A1298C in MTHFR gene are not susceptibility gene for lung cancer from currently available evidence.     

Association of a LSP1 gene rs3817198T>C polymorphism with breast cancer risk: evidence from 33,920 cases and 35,671 controls

Published data on the association between lymphocyte-specific protein 1 (LSP1) rs3817198T>C polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis of the LSP1 gene and risk of breast cancer to obtain the most reliable estimate of the association. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and pooled to assess the strength of the association between the LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism and risk of breast cancer. A total of seven eligible studies including 33,920 cases and 35,671 controls based on the search criteria were involved in this meta-analysis. The distributions of genotypes in the controls were all in agreement with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. We observed that the LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism was significantly correlated with breast cancer risk when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (the allele contrast model: OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.04–1.08; the homozygote codominant: OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.01–1.28). In the stratified analysis by ethnicity, significant association was observed in Caucasians for CC versus TT homozygote codominant model (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.03–1.52) and for the recessive model (OR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.02–1.47). There was significant association observed in Africans for CC versus TT homozygote codominant model (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.22–0.92) and for the recessive model (OR = 0.43; 95% CI=0.22–0.88). Also, significant association was observed in mixed ethnicities for CC versus TT homozygote codominant model (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.05–1.19). When stratified by study design, statistically significantly elevated risk was found in nested case–control studies (CC vs. TT: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.05–1.19). But no significant association was observed for all comparison models between LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism and breast cancer risk in hospital-based and people-based studies. When stratified by BRCA1 mutation carriers status, statistically significantly elevated risk was found in this meta-analysis (the allele contrast model: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01–1.14; the dominant model: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.00–1.18). And significant association was found in the BRCA2 mutation carriers in the allele contrast (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.03–1.20), the homozygote codominant (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.04–1.47), the heterozygote codominant (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.00–1.25) and the dominant models (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.03–1.27). There was significant association between LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 positive cohort in all comparison models (the allele contrast model: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.03–1.13; CC vs. TT: OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.05–1.29; TC vs. TT: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.01–1.16; the dominant model: OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.03–1.17; the recessive model: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.01–1.23). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism is a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast cancer but may not be in Africans.     

Association between the XRCC3 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis based on case–control studies

The previous published data on the association between X-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) T241M, A4541G, and A17893G polymorphisms and breast cancer risk remained controversial. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the association between breast cancer and XRCC3 T241M (21,910 cases and 23,961 controls), A4541G (9,633 cases and 10,994 controls), and A17893G polymorphisms (10,761 cases and 12,235 controls) in different inheritance models. When all the eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis of XRCC3 T241M polymorphism, significantly increased risk of breast cancer was observed in recessive model (odds' ratio [OR] = 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04–1.16) and in additive model (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.03–1.16). No significant association was found between A4541G polymorphism and breast cancer risk. When all the eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis of XRCC3 A17893G polymorphism, no significant association was found in any genetic model. Additionally, when one study was deleted in the sensitive analysis, the results of XRCC3 A17893G were changed in the additive model (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82–0.99) and dominant model (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89–0.99). In summary, this meta-analysis indicates that T241M polymorphism show an increased breast cancer risk and A17893G polymorphism may be associated with decreased breast cancer risk. A study with the larger sample size is needed to further evaluated gene-environment interaction on XRCC3 T241M, A4541G, and A17893G polymorphisms and breast cancer risk.     

CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I polymorphism contributes to oral cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

Previous data on association between CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I polymorphism and oral cancer risk were controversial. To investigate the association between CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I polymorphism and oral cancer risk. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between oral cancer and genotype with English language until June 2010. Twelve published case–control studies of 1259 patients with oral cancer and 2262 controls were acquired. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association in codominant and dominant models. Overall, the pooled ORs indicated a significant association between CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I polymorphism and oral cancer risk (for c1/c2 vs. c1/c1: OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.04–1.62, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.57; for (c1/c2 + c2/c2) vs. c1/c1: OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.07–1.64, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.57, respectively). In subgroup analysis by race, the same significant risks were found among Asian (for c1/c2 vs. c1/c1: OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.05–1.91, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.92; for (c1/c2 + c2/c2) vs. c1/c1: OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.08–1.88, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.97, respectively). In conclusion, this meta-analysis demonstrates that CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I c2 allele may be a biomarker for oral cancer, especially among Asian populations.     

Association of C47T polymorphism in <Emphasis Type="Italic">SOD2</Emphasis> gene with coronary artery disease: a case–control study and a meta-analysis

Oxidative damage promotes atherosclerosis. SOD2 is an important antioxidant enzyme. A case–control study and a meta-analysis were performed to assess the association of C47T polymorphism in SOD2 gene with premature, late-onset and overall coronary artery disease (CAD) risk. A hospital-based case–control study was conducted with 269 premature CAD cases, 278 late-onset CAD cases and 299 healthy controls. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Pyrosequencing were used to detect the polymorphism. Multinomial logistic regression model was performed to estimate odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and adjust potential confounders. A meta-analysis was performed using eight outcomes including our result. Fixed or random effect pooled measure was selected on the basis of homogeneity test among studies. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using I ². Meta-regression was used to explore potential sources of between-study heterogeneity. Publication bias was estimated using Peters’s linear regression test. In our case–control study, compared with the TT as the reference, the mutant genotype of CC + TC was significantly associated with a reduced premature CAD risk both in univariate (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.41–0.87) and multivariate (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.40–0.87) logistic regressions, but not with late-onset CAD risk. After excluding one article that deviated from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in controls, this meta-analysis showed a significant association of the C allele with reduced risk of CAD in dominant (FEM: OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.61–0.78), recessive (OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.50–0.82), and codominant (FEM: OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.65–0.80) models. Our study suggested that the mutant genotype of CC + TC was significantly associated with a reduced CAD risk.     

Meta-analysis of TYK2 gene polymorphisms association with susceptibility to autoimmune and inflammatory diseases

The aim of our meta-analysis was to quantitatively summarize the association of TYK2 gene polymorphisms with autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. 11 studies that included data from 21497 cases and 22647 controls were identified. OR was used as a measure of the effect of the association in a fixed/random effect model. Meta-analysis was performed for six TYK2 gene polymorphisms (rs34536443, rs2304256, rs280523, rs280519, rs12720270 and rs12720356). Significant association was found in rs34536443 (C versus G: OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.69–0.84, P < 0.00001; GC + CC versus GG: OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.68–0.90, P = 0.0005; CC versus GG + GC: OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.28–2.05, P = 0.58; CC versus GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.27–2.02, P = 0.56; GC versus GG: OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.68–0.90, P = 0.0006) and rs2304256 (A versus C: OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.70–0.87, P < 0.0001; CA + AA versus CC: OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.59–0.81, P < 0.0001; AA versus CC + CA: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.66–1.00, P = 0.05; AA versus CC: OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.47–0.86, P = 0.003; CA versus CC: OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.60–0.83, P < 0.0001) in TYK2 gene, but not for the other polymorphisms (rs280523, rs280519, rs12720270, and rs12720356). This meta-analysis demonstrates that autoimmune and inflammatory diseases is associated with TYK2 gene rs34536443 and rs2304256 polymorphisms, but not rs280523, rs280519, rs12720270 and rs12720356.     

Association between TNF-α polymorphisms and cervical cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is a vital cytokine involved in inflammation, immunity, and cellular organization. The TNFA-308G/A (rs1800629) and -238G/A (rs361525) polymorphisms are two widely investigated variants for their associations with risk of cervical cancer, but the results are conflicting. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to pool the data and evaluate the between-studies heterogeneity. All the case–control studies published from January 1989 to October 2010 on the association between the two polymorphisms of TNFA and cervical cancer risk were identified by searching the electronic literature Medline. The cervical cancer risk associated with the two polymorphisms of TNFA gene was estimated for each study by OR together with its 95% CI, respectively, by using the Review Manager 4.2 software. It was showed that the variant homozygote -308AA was associated with a significantly increased risk of cervical cancer (AA vs. GG: OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.03–1.92, P = 0.033; AA vs. GA/GG: OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.02–1.90, P = 0.036), and the effect was more evident among Asians (AA vs. GA/GG: OR = 3.67, 95% CI = 1.25–10.81, P = 0.018). We also found that the variant genotypes -238GA/AA was associated with a significantly decreased risk of cervical cancer (GA/AA vs. GG: OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.41–0.74, P < 0.001). The results suggested that TNFA-308G/A and -238G/A may contribute to cervical cancer susceptibility.     

Differential effects of paraoxonase 1 (PON1) polymorphisms on cancer risk: evidence from 25 published studies

Paraoxonase is an HDL-associated enzyme that plays a preventive role against oxidative stress, which is thought to contribute to cancer development. PON1 activity varies widely among individuals, which is in part related to two common nonsynonymous polymorphisms in the PON1 gene (Q192R and L55M). The polymorphisms in PON1 have been implicated in cancer risk. However, results from the studies to date have been conflicting. To clarify the association, a meta-analysis was performed for 7,073 cases and 9,520 controls from 25 published case–control studies. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association. Significant associations between PON1-L55M but not Q192R polymorphism and total cancer were observed from all the comparisons. In stratified analyses, PON1-55M allele was a risk factor for breast cancer. Similarly, increased risk was observed for prostate cancer (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.01–1.36, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.260) and Caucasian population (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02–1.38, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.1) of the LM genotype, compared with the LL genotype. For PON1-Q192R polymorphism, PON1-192R allele was a decreased risk factor for cancer in the Asian group (RR vs QQ: OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.38–0.98, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.268; QR vs QQ: OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52–0.96, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.130; RR + QR vs QQ: OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53–0.95, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.135). Although some modest bias could not be eliminated, this meta-analysis suggests that the PON1-55M allele is a risk factor for the development of cancer, in particular for breast cancer. Future studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to further evaluate these associations.     

GSTT1 Null Genotype Contributes to Lung Cancer Risk in Asian Populations: A Meta-Analysis of 23 Studies

Background

Genetic variation in glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) may contribute to lung cancer risk. Many studies have investigated the correlation between the Glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) null genotype and lung cancer risk in Asian population but yielded inconclusive results.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We performed a meta-analysis of 23 studies including 4065 cases and 5390 controls. We assessed the strength of the association of GSTT1 with lung cancer risk and performed sub-group analyses by source of controls, smoking status, histological types, and sample size. A statistically significant correlation between GSTT1 null genotype and lung cancer in Asian population was observed (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.10, 1.49; P_{heterogeneity}<0.001 and I² = 62.0%). Sub-group analysis revealed there was a statistically increased lung cancer risk in ever-smokers who carried the GSTT1 null genotype (OR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.27, 2.96; P heterogeneity = 0.02 and I² = 58.1%). It was also indicated that GSTT1 null genotype could increase lung cancer risk among population-based studies (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.50; P_{heterogeneity} = 0.003 and I² = 56.8%). The positive association was also found in studies of sample size (≤500 participants) (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.10, 1.62; P_{heterogeneity}<0.001 and I² = 65.4%).

Conclusions

These meta-analysis results suggest that GSTT1 null genotype is associated with a significantly increased risk of lung cancer in Asian population.