Oxanine DNA glycosylase activity from Mammalian alkyladenine glycosylase

Oxanine (Oxa) is a deaminated base lesion derived from guanine in which the N(1)-nitrogen is substituted by oxygen. This work reports the mutagenicity of oxanine as well as oxanine DNA glycosylase (ODG) activities in mammalian systems. Using human DNA polymerase beta, deoxyoxanosine triphosphate is only incorporated opposite cytosine (Cyt). When an oxanine base is in a DNA template, Cyt is efficiently incorporated opposite the template oxanine; however, adenine and thymine are also incorporated opposite Oxa with an efficiency approximately 80% of a Cyt/Oxa (C/O) base pair. Guanine is incorporated opposite Oxa with the least efficiency, 16% compared with cytosine. ODG activity was detected in several mammalian cell extracts. Among the known human DNA glycosylases tested, human alkyladenine glycosylase (AAG) shows ODG activity, whereas hOGG1, hNEIL1, or hNEIL2 did not. ODG activity was detected in spleen cell extracts of wild type age-matched mice, but little activity was observed in that of Aag knock-out mice, confirming that the ODG activity is intrinsic to AAG. Human AAG can excise Oxa from all four Oxa-containing double-stranded base pairs, Cyt/Oxa, Thy/Oxa, Ade/Oxa, and Gua/Oxa, with no preference to base pairing. Surprisingly, AAG can remove Oxa from single-stranded Oxa-containing DNA as well. Indeed, AAG can also remove 1,N(6)-ethenoadenine from single-stranded DNA. This study extends the deaminated base glycosylase activities of AAG to oxanine; thus, AAG is a mammalian enzyme that can act on all three purine deamination bases, hypoxanthine, xanthine, and oxanine.     

Germline ablation of SMUG1 DNA glycosylase causes loss of 5-hydroxymethyluracil- and UNG-backup uracil-excision activities and increases cancer predisposition of Ung-/-Msh2-/- mice

Deamination of cytosine (C), 5-methylcytosine (mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (hmC) occurs spontaneously in mammalian DNA with several hundred deaminations occurring in each cell every day. The resulting potentially mutagenic mispairs of uracil (U), thymine (T) or 5-hydroxymethyluracil (hmU) with guanine (G) are substrates for repair by various DNA glycosylases. Here, we show that targeted inactivation of the mouse Smug1 DNA glycosylase gene is sufficient to ablate nearly all hmU-DNA excision activity as judged by assay of tissue extracts from knockout mice as well as by the resistance of their embryo fibroblasts to 5-hydroxymethyldeoxyuridine toxicity. Inactivation of Smug1 when combined with inactivation of the Ung uracil-DNA glycosylase gene leads to a loss of nearly all detectable uracil excision activity. Thus, SMUG1 is the dominant glycosylase responsible for hmU-excision in mice as well as the major UNG-backup for U-excision. Both Smug1-knockout and Smug1/Ung-double knockout mice breed normally and remain apparently healthy beyond 1 year of age. However, combined deficiency in SMUG1 and UNG exacerbates the cancer predisposition of Msh2(-/-) mice suggesting that when both base excision and mismatch repair pathways are defective, the mutagenic effects of spontaneous cytosine deamination are sufficient to increase cancer incidence but do not preclude mouse development.     

Crystal structure of human methyl-binding domain IV glycosylase bound to abasic DNA

The mammalian repair protein MBD4 (methyl-CpG-binding domain IV) excises thymine from mutagenic G·T mispairs generated by deamination of 5-methylcytosine (mC), and downstream base excision repair proteins restore a G·C pair. MBD4 is also implicated in active DNA demethylation by initiating base excision repair of G·T mispairs generated by a deaminase enzyme. The question of how mismatch glycosylases attain specificity for excising thymine from G·T, but not A·T, pairs remains largely unresolved. Here, we report a crystal structure of the glycosylase domain of human MBD4 (residues 427-580) bound to DNA containing an abasic nucleotide paired with guanine, providing a glimpse of the enzyme-product complex. The mismatched guanine remains intrahelical, nestled into a recognition pocket. MBD4 provides selective interactions with the mismatched guanine (N1H, N2H(2)) that are not compatible with adenine, which likely confer mismatch specificity. The structure reveals no interactions that would be expected to provide the MBD4 glycosylase domain with specificity for acting at CpG sites. Accordingly, we find modest 1.5- to 2.7-fold reductions in G·T activity upon altering the CpG context. In contrast, 37- to 580-fold effects were observed previously for thymine DNA glycosylase. These findings suggest that specificity of MBD4 for acting at CpG sites depends largely on its methyl-CpG-binding domain, which binds preferably to G·T mispairs in a methylated CpG site. MBD4 glycosylase cannot excise 5-formylcytosine (fC) or 5-carboxylcytosine (caC), intermediates in a Tet (ten eleven translocation)-initiated DNA demethylation pathway. Our structure suggests that MBD4 does not provide the electrostatic interactions needed to excise these oxidized forms of mC.     

Excision Repair of 2,5-Diaziridinyl-1,4-Benzoquinone (DZQ)-DNA Adduct by Bacterial and Mammalian 3-Methyladenine-DNA Glycosylases

The mechanisms of anticancer activity of 2,5-diaziridinyl-1,4-benzoquinone (DZQ) are believed to involve the alkylation of guanine and adenine bases. In this study, it has been investigated whether bacterial and mammalian 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylases are able to excise DZQ-DNA adduct with a differential substrate specificity. DZQ-induced DNA adduct was first formed in the radiolabeled restriction enzyme DNA fragment, and excision of the DNA adduct was analyzed following treatment with homogeneous 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylase from E. coli, rat, and human, respectively. Abasic sites generated by DNA glycosylases were cleaved by the associated lyase activity of the E. coli formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase. Resolution of cleaved DNA on a sequencing gel with Maxam-Gilbert sequencing reactions showed that DZQ-induced adenine and guanine adducts were very good substrates for bacterial and mammalian enzymes. The E. coli enzyme excises DZQ-induced adenine and guanine adducts with similar efficiency. The rat and human enzymes, however, excise the adenine adduct more efficiently than the guanine adduct. These results suggest that the 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylases from different origins have differential substrate specificity to release DZQ-DNA lesions. The use of 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylase incision analysis could possibly be applied to quantify a variety of DNA adducts at the nucleotide level.     

Repair activity of base and nucleotide excision repair enzymes for guanine lesions induced by nitrosative stress

Nitric oxide (NO) induces deamination of guanine, yielding xanthine and oxanine (Oxa). Furthermore, Oxa reacts with polyamines and DNA binding proteins to form cross-link adducts. Thus, it is of interest how these lesions are processed by DNA repair enzymes in view of the genotoxic mechanism of NO. In the present study, we have examined the repair capacity for Oxa and Oxa–spermine cross-link adducts (Oxa–Sp) of enzymes involved in base excision repair (BER) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) to delineate the repair mechanism of nitrosative damage to guanine. Oligonucleotide substrates containing Oxa and Oxa–Sp were incubated with purified BER and NER enzymes or cell-free extracts (CFEs), and the damage-excising or DNA-incising activity was compared with that for control (physiological) substrates. The Oxa-excising activities of Escherichia coli and human DNA glycosylases and HeLa CFEs were 0.2–9% relative to control substrates, implying poor processing of Oxa by BER. In contrast, DNA containing Oxa–Sp was incised efficiently by UvrABC nuclease and SOS-induced E.coli CFEs, suggesting a role of NER in ameliorating genotoxic effects associated with nitrosative stress. Analyses of the activity of CFEs from NER-proficient and NER-deficient human cells on Oxa–Sp DNA confirmed further the involvement of NER in the repair of nitrosative DNA damage.     

Mammalian 5-formyluracil-DNA glycosylase. 2. Role of SMUG1 uracil-DNA glycosylase in repair of 5-formyluracil and other oxidized and deaminated base lesions

In the accompanying paper [Matsubara, M., et al. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 4993-5002], we have partially purified and characterized rat 5-formyluracil (fU)-DNA glycosylase (FDG). Several lines of evidence have indicated that FDG is a rat homologue of single-strand-selective monofunctional uracil-DNA glycosylase (SMUG1). We report here that rat and human SMUG1 (rSMUG1 and hSMUG1) expressed from the corresponding cDNAs indeed excise fU in single-stranded (ss) and double-stranded (ds) DNA. The enzymes also excised uracil (U) and uracil derivatives bearing an oxidized group at C5 [5-hydroxyuracil (hoU) and 5-hydroxymethyluracil (hmU)] in ssDNA and dsDNA but not analogous cytosine derivatives (5-hydroxycytosine and 5-formylcytosine) and other oxidized damage. The damage specificity and the salt concentration dependence of rSMUG1 (and hSMUG1) agreed well with those of FDG, confirming that FDG is rSMUG1. Consistent with the damage specificity above, hSMUG1 removed damaged bases from Fenton-oxidized calf thymus DNA, generating abasic sites. The amount of resulting abasic sites was about 10% of that generated by endonuclease III or 8-oxoguanine glycosylase in the same substrate. The HeLa cell extract and hSMUG1 exhibited a similar damage preference (hoU.G > hmU.A, fU.A), and the activities for fU, hmU, and hoU in the cell extract were effectively neutralized with hSMUG1 antibodies. These data indicate a dual role of hSMUG1 as a backup enzyme for UNG and a primary repair enzyme for a subset of oxidized pyrimidines such as fU, hmU, and hoU.     

Excision Repair of 2,5-Diaziridinyl-1,4-Benzoquinone (DZQ)-DNA Adduct by Bacterial and Mammalian 3-Methyladenine-DNA Glycosylases

The mechanisms of anticancer activity of 2,5-diaziridinyl-1,4-benzoquinone (DZQ) are believed to involve the alkylation of guanine and adenine bases. In this study, it has been investigated whether bacterial and mammalian 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylases are able to excise DZQ-DNA adduct with a differential substrate specificity. DZQ-induced DNA adduct was first formed in the radiolabeled restriction enzyme DNA fragment, and excision of the DNA adduct was analyzed following treatment with homogeneous 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylase from E. coli, rat, and human, respectively. Abasic sites generated by DNA glycosylases were cleaved by the associated lyase activity of the E. coli formami-dopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase. Resolution of cleaved DNA on a sequencing gel with Maxam-Gilbert sequencing reactions showed that DZQ-induced adenine and guanine adducts were very good substrates for bacterial and mammalian enzymes. The E. coli enzyme excises DZQ-induced adenine and guanine adducts with similar efficiency. The rat and human enzymes, however, excise the adenine adduct more efficiently than the guanine adduct. These results suggest that the 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylases from different origins have differential substrate specificity to release DZQ-DNA lesions. The use of 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylase incision analysis could possibly be applied to quantify a variety of DNA adducts at the nucleotide level.     

Alkyladenine DNA glycosylase (Aag) in somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination

Somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class switch recombination (CSR) of immunoglobulin (Ig) genes require the cytosine deaminase AID, which deaminates cytosine to uracil in Ig gene DNA. Paradoxically, proteins involved normally in error-free base excision repair and mismatch repair, seem to be co-opted to facilitate SHM and CSR, by recruiting error-prone translesion polymerases to DNA sequences containing deoxy-uracils created by AID. Major evidence supports at least one mechanism whereby the uracil glycosylase Ung removes AID-generated uracils creating abasic sites which may be used either as uninformative templates for DNA synthesis, or processed to nicks and gaps that prime error-prone DNA synthesis. We investigated the possibility that deamination at adenines also initiates SHM. Adenosine deamination would generate hypoxanthine (Hx), a substrate for the alkyladenine DNA glycosylase (Aag). Aag would generate abasic sites which then are subject to error-prone repair as above for AID-deaminated cytosine processed by Ung. If the action of an adenosine deaminase followed by Aag were responsible for significant numbers of mutations at A, we would find a preponderance of A:T>G:C transition mutations during SHM in an Aag deleted background. However, this was not observed and we found that the frequencies of SHM and CSR were not significantly altered in Aag-/- mice. Paradoxically, we found that Aag is expressed in B lymphocytes undergoing SHM and CSR and that its activity is upregulated in activated B cells. Moreover, we did find a statistically significant, albeit low increase of T:A>C:G transition mutations in Aag-/- animals, suggesting that Aag may be involved in creating the SHM A>T bias seen in wild type mice.     

XRCC1 interactions with multiple DNA glycosylases: a model for its recruitment to base excision repair

Repair of chemically modified bases in DNA is accomplished through base excision repair (BER). This pathway is initiated by a specific DNA glycosylase that recognizes and excises the altered base to yield an abasic (AP) site. After cleavage of the AP site by APE1, repair proceeds through re-synthesis and ligation steps. In mammalian cells, the XRCC1 protein, essential for the maintenance of genomic stability, is involved in both base excision and single-strand break repair. XRCC1 participates in the first step of BER by interacting with the human DNA glycosylases hOGG1 and NEIL1. To analyze the possibility of a general mechanism involving the interaction of XRCC1 with DNA glycosylases we used XRCC1 to pull-down DNA glycosylases activities from human cell extracts. XRCC1 co-purifies with DNA glycosylase activities capable of excising hypoxanthine and dihydrothymine, in addition to 8-oxoguanine, but not uracil. Biochemical analyses with the purified proteins confirmed the interactions between XRCC1 and MPG, hNTH1 or hNEIL2. Furthermore, XRCC1 stimulates the activities of these enzymes. In vivo localization studies show that after genotoxic treatments these DNA glycosylases can be found associated with XRCC1 foci. Our results support a BER model in which XRCC1 is recruited to the repair of alkylated or oxidized bases by the enzyme recognizing the lesion. XRCC1 would then coordinate the subsequent enzymatic steps and modulate the activities of all the proteins involved.     

Purification and characterization of 5-hydroxymethyluracil-DNA glycosylase from calf thymus. Its possible role in the maintenance of methylated cytosine residues

5-Hydroxymethyluracil (HmUra) residues formed by the oxidation of thymine are removed from DNA through the action of a DNA glycosylase activity. This activity was purified over 1870-fold from calf thymus and found to be distinct from uracil (Ura)-DNA glycosylase. The HmUra-DNA glycosylase has a molecular weight of 38,000, a pH optimum of 6.7-6.8 and an apparent Km of 0.73 +/- 0.04 microM. These values are similar to those reported for other mammalian DNA glycosylases. The enzyme removed HmUra residues from single- and double-stranded DNA with almost equal efficiency. HmUra-DNA glycosylase activity was not product inhibited by free HmUra. The DNA glycosylase activity was inhibited by Mg2+, but the purest enzyme fractions contained a Mg2+-dependent apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease activity. HmUra-DNA glycosylase and the recently described 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (HmCyt)-DNA glycosylase (Cannon, S. V., Cummings, A. C., and Teebor, G. W. (1988) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 151, 1173-1179) are unique among known DNA glycosylases in being present in mammalian cells and absent from bacteria. These DNA glycosylase activities were shown here to reside on different proteins. We suggest that the major function of HmUra-DNA glycosylase, together with HmCyt-DNA glycosylase, is the maintenance of methylated cytosine residues in the DNA of higher organisms.     

Repair of deaminated base damage by Schizosaccharomyces pombe thymine DNA glycosylase

Thymine DNA glycosylases (TDG) in eukaryotic organisms are known for their double-stranded glycosylase activity on guanine/uracil (G/U) base pairs. Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Spo) TDG is a member of the MUG/TDG family that belongs to a uracil DNA glycosylase superfamily. This work investigates the DNA repair activity of Spo TDG on all four deaminated bases: xanthine (X) and oxanine (O) from guanine, hypoxanthine (I) from adenine, and uracil from cytosine. Unexpectedly, Spo TDG exhibits glycosylase activity on all deaminated bases in both double-stranded and single-stranded DNA in the descending order of X > I > U  O. In comparison, human TDG only excises deaminated bases from G/U and, to a much lower extent, A/U and G/I base pairs. Amino acid substitutions in motifs 1 and 2 of Spo TDG show a significant impact on deaminated base repair activity. The overall mutational effects are characterized by a loss of glycosylase activity on oxanine in all five mutants. L157I in motif 1 and G288M in motif 2 retain xanthine DNA glycosylase (XDG) activity but reduce excision of hypoxanthine and uracil, in particular in C/I, single-stranded hypoxanthine (ss-I), A/U, and single-stranded uracil (ss-U). A proline substitution at I289 in motif 2 causes a significant reduction in XDG activity and a loss of activity on C/I, ss-I, A/U, C/U, G/U, and ss-U. S291G only retains reduced activity on T/I and G/I base pairs. S163A can still excise hypoxanthine and uracil in mismatched base pairs but loses XDG activity, making it the closest mutant, functionally, to human TDG. The relationship among amino acid substitutions, binding affinity and base recognition is discussed.     

Identification of high excision capacity for 5-hydroxymethyluracil mispaired with guanine in DNA of Escherichia coli MutM,Nei and Nth DNA glycosylases

The oxidation and deamination of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) in DNA generates a base-pair between 5-hydroxymethyluracil (5hmU) and guanine. 5hmU normally forms a base-pair with adenine. Therefore, the conversion of 5mC to 5hmU is a potential pathway for the generation of 5mC to T transitions. Mammalian cells have high levels of activity of 5hmU-DNA glycosylase, which excises 5hmU from DNA. However, glycosylases that similarly excise 5hmU have not been observed in yeast or Escherichia coli. Recently, we found that E.coli MutM, Nei and Nth have DNA glycosylase activity for 5-formyluracil, which is another type of oxidation product of the thymine methyl group. In this study, we examined whether or not E.coli MutM, Nei and Nth have also DNA glycosylase activity that acts on 5hmU in vitro. When incubated with synthetic duplex oligonucleotides containing 5hmU:G or 5hmU:A, purified MutM, Nei and Nth cleaved the 5hmU:G oligonucleotide 58, 5 and 37 times, respectively, more efficiently than the 5hmU:A oligonucleotide. In E.coli, the 5hmU-DNA glycosylase activities of MutM, Nei and Nth may play critical roles in the repair of 5hmU:G mispairs to avoid 5mC to T transitions.     

The Bacillus subtilis counterpart of the mammalian 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase has hypoxanthine and 1,N6-ethenoadenine as preferred substrates

The AAG family of 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylases was initially thought to be limited to mammalian cells, but genome sequencing efforts have revealed the presence of homologous proteins in certain prokaryotic species as well. Here, we report the first molecular characterization of a functional prokaryotic AAG homologue, i.e. YxlJ, termed bAag, from Bacillus subtilis. The B. subtilis aag gene was expressed in Escherichia coli, and the protein was purified to homogeneity. As expected, B. subtilis Aag was found to be a DNA glycosylase, which releases 3-alkylated purines and hypoxanthine, as well as the cyclic etheno adduct 1,N(6)-ethenoadenine from DNA. However, kinetic analysis showed that bAag removed hypoxanthine much faster than human AAG with a 10-fold higher value for k(cat), whereas the rate of excision of 1, N(6)-ethenoadenine was found to be similar. In contrast, it was found that bAag removes 3-methyladenine and 3-methylguanine approximately 10-20 times more slowly than human AAG, and there was hardly any detectable excision of 7-methylguanine. It thus appears that bAag has a minor role in the repair of DNA alkylation damage and an important role in preventing the mutagenic effects of deaminated purines and cyclic etheno adducts in Bacillus subtilis.     

Excision of thymine and 5-hydroxymethyluracil by the MBD4 DNA glycosylase domain: structural basis and implications for active DNA demethylation

The mammalian DNA glycosylase-methyl-CpG binding domain protein 4 (MBD4)-is involved in active DNA demethylation via the base excision repair pathway. MBD4 contains an N-terminal MBD and a C-terminal DNA glycosylase domain. MBD4 can excise the mismatched base paired with a guanine (G:X), where X is uracil, thymine or 5-hydroxymethyluracil (5hmU). These are, respectively, the deamination products of cytosine, 5-methylcytosine (5mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC). Here, we present three structures of the MBD4 C-terminal glycosylase domain (wild-type and its catalytic mutant D534N), in complex with DNA containing a G:T or G:5hmU mismatch. MBD4 flips the target nucleotide from the double-stranded DNA. The catalytic mutant D534N captures the intact target nucleotide in the active site binding pocket. MBD4 specifically recognizes the Watson-Crick polar edge of thymine or 5hmU via the O(2), N(3) and O(4) atoms, thus restricting its activity to thymine/uracil-based modifications while excluding cytosine and its derivatives. The wild-type enzyme cleaves the N-glycosidic bond, leaving the ribose ring in the flipped state, while the cleaved base is released. Unexpectedly, the C(1)' of the sugar has yet to be hydrolyzed and appears to form a stable intermediate with one of the side chain carboxyl oxygen atoms of D534, via either electrostatic or covalent interaction, suggesting a different catalytic mechanism from those of other DNA glycosylases.     

Mechanisms of Base Selection by Human Single-stranded Selective Monofunctional Uracil-DNA Glycosylase

hSMUG1 (human single-stranded selective monofunctional uracil-DNA glyscosylase) is one of three glycosylases encoded within a small region of human chromosome 12. Those three glycosylases, UNG (uracil-DNA glycosylase), TDG (thymine-DNA glyscosylase), and hSMUG1, have in common the capacity to remove uracil from DNA. However, these glycosylases also repair other lesions and have distinct substrate preferences, indicating that they have potentially redundant but not overlapping physiological roles. The mechanisms by which these glycosylases locate and selectively remove target lesions are not well understood. In addition to uracil, hSMUG1 has been shown to remove some oxidized pyrimidines, suggesting a role in the repair of DNA oxidation damage. In this paper, we describe experiments in which a series of oligonucleotides containing purine and pyrimidine analogs have been used to probe mechanisms by which hSMUG1 distinguishes potential substrates. Our results indicate that the preference of hSMUG1 for mispaired uracil over uracil paired with adenine is best explained by the reduced stability of a duplex containing a mispair, consistent with previous reports with Escherichia coli mispaired uracil-DNA glycosylase. We have also extended the substrate range of hSMUG1 to include 5-carboxyuracil, the last in the series of damage products from thymine methyl group oxidation. The properties used by hSMUG1 to select damaged pyrimidines include the size and free energy of solvation of the 5-substituent but not electronic inductive properties. The observed distinct mechanisms of base selection demonstrated for members of the uracil glycosylase family help explain how considerable diversity in chemical lesion repair can be achieved.Three glycosylases that initiate DNA repair via the base excision repair (BER)2 pathway are found on human chromosome 12. These three glycosylases are designated as UNG, TDG, and hSMUG1 (1–4). Several groups are currently investigating the structure and properties of these glycosylases in order to determine their physiological roles. A common property of these enzymes is the cleavage of uracil residues from DNA, although each of the glycosylases repairs additional lesions. Despite low sequence homology (8%), these three glycosylases share a common fold and overall architecture (5). Subtle differences in structure apparently distinguish these repair enzymes with respect to substrate and context preferences.UNG is the most active of the glycosylases. UNG recognizes uracil residues when found in single strand, or double strand DNA paired with adenine or mispaired with guanine (6); however, only a small number of other pyrimidines are also targets. UNG is spliced into two forms, UNG1 and UNG2. UNG1 is targeted to the mitochondrion, whereas UNG2 is found primarily in the cell nucleus (7). Due to the capacity of UNG to repair uracil in many contexts, as well as its association with DNA replication machinery and cell cycle specificity, it is thought that a primary role for UNG is in the repair of uracil misincorporated opposite adenine during DNA replication (8, 9). Recent studies also suggest an important role for UNG in removing uracil residues in DNA generated by activation-induced deaminase as part of somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination in activated B-cells (10–12).In contrast to UNG, the related glycosylases hSMUG1 and TDG appear to target uracil and uracil analogs mispaired with guanine (3, 13, 14). Although hSMUG1 was originally characterized as a single strand selective glycosylase (13), more recent studies suggest it is more active on mispaired uracil in duplex DNA (14), and it has an extended substrate range, removing several oxidized pyrimidines (15–18), including 5-hydroxymethyluracil (HmU), 5-formyluracil (FoU), and 5-hydroxyuracil (HoU). TDG appears to act exclusively on duplex substrates, with a strong preference for mispaired pyrimidines, including thymine, and a strong preference for damage located in CpG dinucleotides (19–21). The apparent sequence selectivity of TDG has led to suggestions that the primary role of TDG is the repair of deaminated 5-methylcytosine residues in CpG dinucleotides (20).In this paper, we have investigated the enzymatic properties of recombinant human SMUG1 in single-turnover kinetic assays on a series of oligonucleotide substrates containing purine and pyrimidine analogs. In the first set of experiments, the capacity of hSMUG1 to cleave uracil opposite a series of purine analogs was measured to determine if the preference of hSMUG1 for mispairs can be attributed to reduced duplex stability or if hSMUG1 recognizes specific functional groups on the purine opposite the target uracil. In the second series of experiments, a series of 5-substituted uracil analogs was paired opposite guanine to probe the mechanisms by which hSMUG1 distinguishes potential substrates. This series includes uracil, a series of oxidatively damaged pyrimidines, and the 5-halouracils, which serve to measure both substituent size and electronic inductive properties. New to this series is 5-carboxyuracil (CaU), the last in the sequence of damage products arising from oxidation of the thymine methyl group (22–24).Previous studies with other glycosylases described above have highlighted the importance of size and electronic inductive properties of 5-substituted pyrimidines in substrate selection. In contrast, the capacity of hSMUG1 to recognize HmU but not thymine has been attributed to the hydrophilicity and hydrogen-bonding capacity of the HmU substituent (15–18). In this paper, selected physical properties have been calculated for each pyrimidine examined, including solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) and the free energy of solvation in water. The SASA is introduced as a parameter to define the relative size of the 5-substituted pyrimidines, whereas the free energy of solvation in water is proposed to describe the capacity of the 5-substituted pyrimidine to interact with or replace water within the hSMUG1 pyrimidine binding pocket. The observed kinetic rate constants are compared with the physical properties of the modified bases and base pairs in order to explain the mechanisms by which hSMUG1 identifies and distinguishes target lesions. Our results indicate that the strategies used by hSMUG1 to select target bases and avoid normal bases contrast with those of other members of the uracil DNA-glycosylase family.     

Base excision repair and its role in maintaining genome stability

For all living organisms, genome stability is important, but is also under constant threat because various environmental and endogenous damaging agents can modify the structural properties of DNA bases. As a defense, organisms have developed different DNA repair pathways. Base excision repair (BER) is the predominant pathway for coping with a broad range of small lesions resulting from oxidation, alkylation, and deamination, which modify individual bases without large effect on the double helix structure. As, in mammalian cells, this damage is estimated to account daily for 10(4) events per cell, the need for BER pathways is unquestionable. The damage-specific removal is carried out by a considerable group of enzymes, designated as DNA glycosylases. Each DNA glycosylase has its unique specificity and many of them are ubiquitous in microorganisms, mammals, and plants. Here, we review the importance of the BER pathway and we focus on the different roles of DNA glycosylases in various organisms.     

In vivo repair of methylation damage in Aag 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase null mouse cells

3-Methyladenine (3MeA) DNA glycosylases initiate base excision repair by removing 3MeA. These glycosylases also remove a broad spectrum of spontaneous and environmentally induced base lesions in vitro. Mouse cells lacking the Aag 3MeA DNA glycosylase (also known as the Mpg, APNG or ANPG DNA glycosylase) are susceptible to 3MeA-induced S phase arrest, chromosome aberrations and apoptosis, but it is not known if Aag is solely responsible for repair of 3MeA in vivo. Here we show that in Aag^–/– cells, 3MeA lesions disappear from the genome slightly faster than would be expected by spontaneous depurination alone, suggesting that there may be residual repair of 3MeA. However, repair of 3MeA is at least 10 times slower in Aag^–/– cells than in Aag^+/+ cells. Consequently, 24 h after exposure to [³H]MNU, 30% of the original 3MeA burden is intact in Aag^–/– cells, while 3MeA is undetectable in Aag^+/+ cells. Thus, Aag is the major DNA glycosylase for 3MeA repair. We also investigated the in vivo repair kinetics of another Aag substrate, 7-methylguanine. Surprisingly, 7-methylguanine is removed equally efficiently in Aag^+/+ and Aag^–/– cells, suggesting that another DNA glycosylase acts on lesions previously thought to be repaired by Aag.     

Preparation and enzymatic recognition of guanine lesions induced by nitrogen oxides.

Xanthine (Xan) and oxanine (Oxa) are the major deamination products of guanine formed by the treatment with nitrogen oxides (e.g., NO and HNO2). In this study, 2'-deoxyribonucleoside 5'-triphosphates of Xan and Oxa were prepared by the NaNO2 treatment of dGTP. These modified nucleotides were incorporated into oligonucleotides by DNA polymerase reactions. The repair activities of various DNA N-glycosylases for Xan and Oxa were examined using these substrates.     

Mutational studies of Pa-AGOG DNA glycosylase from the hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon Pyrobaculum aerophilum

In all organisms studied to date, 8-oxoguanine (GO), an important oxidation product of guanine, is removed by highly conserved GO DNA glycosylases. The hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon Pyrobaculum aerophilum encodes a GO DNA glycosylase, Pa-AGOG (Archaeal GO DNA glycosylase) which has become the founding member of a new family within the HhH-GPD superfamily of DNA glycosylases based on unique structural and functional characteristics. In this study, we made quantitative measurements of the DNA glycosylase activity of Pa-AGOG wild type and some engineered variants under single turnover conditions. The mutagenesis study includes residues Trp222 (W222A and W222F), Trp69 (W69F), Gln31 (Q31S) and Lys147 (K147Q) all of which are involved in GO recognition and Asp172 (D172N and D172Q) and Lys140 (K140Q) that are involved in catalysis. Pa-AGOG prefers GO/G mispairs for both base excision and base excision/β-lyase activities. The mutagenesis studies show that base-stacking between GO and Trp222 is very important for recognition. The contact between Trp69 and the 8-oxo group was found to be dispensable, while that to N⁷ by Gln31 is indispensable for GO recognition. In contrast to human OGG1 the catalytic mutant, D172Q did not show detectable glycosylase activity. Pa-AGOG mutants K140Q, D172N and D172Q did bind GO containing single-stranded DNA more tightly than double-stranded DNA containing a GO/C base pair. Our studies confirm and extend the unique characteristics of Pa-AGOG, which distinguish it from other mesophilic and thermostable GO DNA glycosylases.