Anti-cooperative assembly of the SRP19 and SRP68/72 components of the signal recognition particle

The mammalian SRP (signal recognition particle) represents an important model for the assembly and role of inter-domain interactions in complex RNPs (ribonucleoproteins). In the present study we analysed the interdependent interactions between the SRP19, SRP68 and SRP72 proteins and the SRP RNA. SRP72 binds the SRP RNA largely via non-specific electrostatic interactions and enhances the affinity of SRP68 for the RNA. SRP19 and SRP68 both bind directly and specifically to the same two RNA helices, but on opposite faces and at opposite ends. SRP19 binds at the apices of helices 6 and 8, whereas the SRP68/72 heterodimer binds at the three-way junction involving RNA helices 5, 6 and 8. Even though both SRP19 and SRP68/72 stabilize a similar parallel orientation for RNA helices 6 and 8, these two proteins bind to the RNA with moderate anti-cooperativity. Long-range anti-cooperative binding by SRP19 and SRP68/72 appears to arise from stabilization of distinct conformations in the stiff intervening RNA scaffold. Assembly of large RNPs is generally thought to involve either co-operative or energetically neutral interactions among components. By contrast, our findings emphasize that antagonistic interactions can play significant roles in assembly of multi-subunit RNPs.     

Role of SRP19 in assembly of the Archaeoglobus fulgidus signal recognition particle

Previous studies have shown that SRP19 promotes association of the highly conserved signal peptide-binding protein, SRP54, with the signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA in both archaeal and eukaryotic model systems. In vitro characterization of this process is now reported using recombinantly expressed components of SRP from the hyperthermophilic, sulfate-reducing archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidis. A combination of native gel mobility shift, filter binding, and Ni-NTA agarose bead binding assays were used to determine the binding constants for binary and ternary complexes of SRP proteins and SRP RNA. Archaeal SRP54, unlike eukaryotic homologues, has significant intrinsic affinity for 7S RNA (K(D) approximately 15 nM), making it possible to directly compare particles formed in the presence and absence of SRP19 and thereby assess the precise role of SRP19 in the assembly process. Chemical modification studies using hydroxyl radicals and DEPC identify nonoverlapping primary binding sites for SRP19 and SRP54 corresponding to the tips of helix 6 and helix 8 (SRP19) and the distal loop and asymmetric bulge of helix 8 (SRP54). SRP19 additionally induces conformational changes concentrated in the proximal asymmetric bulge of helix 8. Selected nucleotides in this bulge become modified as a result of SRP19 binding but are subsequently protected from modification by formation of the complete complex with SRP54. Together these results suggest a model for assembly in which bridging the ends of helix 6 and helix 8 by SRP19 induces a long-range structural change to present the proximal bulge in a conformation compatible with high-affinity SRP54 binding.     

Assembly of the human signal recognition particle (SRP): overlap of regions required for binding of protein SRP54 and assembly control.

Assembly of the human signal recognition particle (SRP) entails the incorporation of protein SRP54, mediated by a protein SRP1 9-induced conformational change in SRP RNA. To localize the region that controls this crucial step in the assembly of human SRP RNA, four chimeras, Ch-1 to Ch-4, composed of portions of human and Methanococcus jannashii SRP RNAs, were generated by PCR site-directed mutagenesis from a larger precursor. Protein-binding activities of the hybrid RNAs were determined using purified human SRP19 and a polypeptide (SRP54M) that corresponded to the methionine-rich domain of human SRP54. Mutant Ch-1 containing the large domain of M. jannashii SRP RNA, as well as mutant Ch-2 RNA in which helices 6 and 8 were replaced, bound SRP54M independently of SRP19. Mutant Ch-3 RNA, which contained M. jannashii helix 6, required SRP19 for binding of SRP54M, but mutant Ch-4 RNA, which possessed M. jannashii helix 8, bound SRP54M without SRP19. We concluded that the formation of a stable ternary complex did not rely on extensive conformational changes that might take place throughout the large domain of SRP, but was controlled by a smaller region encompassing certain RNA residues at positions 177 to 221. Five chimeric RNAs altered within helix 8 were used to investigate the potential role of a significant AA-to-U change and to determine the boundaries of the assembly control region. Reduced protein-binding activities of these chimeras demonstrated a considerable overlap of regions required for SRP54 binding and assembly control.     

The signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA links conformational changes in the SRP to protein targeting

The RNA component of the signal recognition particle (SRP) is universally required for cotranslational protein targeting. Biochemical studies have shown that SRP RNA participates in the central step of protein targeting by catalyzing the interaction of the SRP with the SRP receptor (SR). SRP RNA also accelerates GTP hydrolysis in the SRP.SR complex once formed. Using a reverse-genetic and biochemical analysis, we identified mutations in the E. coli SRP protein, Ffh, that abrogate the activity of the SRP RNA and cause corresponding targeting defects in vivo. The mutations in Ffh that disrupt SRP RNA activity map to regions that undergo dramatic conformational changes during the targeting reaction, suggesting that the activity of the SRP RNA is linked to the major conformational changes in the signal sequence-binding subunit of the SRP. In this way, the SRP RNA may coordinate the interaction of the SRP and the SR with ribosome recruitment and transfer to the translocon, explaining why the SRP RNA is an indispensable component of the protein targeting machinery.     

Nuclear export of yeast signal recognition particle lacking Srp54p by the Xpo1p/Crm1p NES-dependent pathway

BACKGROUND: The movement of macromolecules through the nuclear pores requires energy and transport receptors that bind both cargo and nuclear pores. Different molecules/complexes often require different transport receptors. The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a conserved cytosolic ribonucleoprotein that targets proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. Previous studies have shown that the export of SRP RNA from the nucleus requires trans-acting factors and that SRP may be at least partly assembled in the nucleus, but little else is known about how it is assembled and exported into the cytoplasm. RESULTS: Of the six proteins that constitute the yeast SRP, we found that all except Srp54p were imported into the nucleus. Four of these had nucleolar pools. The same four proteins are required for stability of the yeast SRP RNA scR1, suggesting that they assemble with the RNA in the nucleus to form a central core SRP. This core SRP was a competent export substrate. Of the remaining components, Sec65p entered the nucleus and was assembled onto the core particle there, whereas Srp54p was solely cytoplasmic. The export of SRP from the nucleus required the transport receptor Xpo1p/Crm1p and Yrb2p, both components of the pathway that exports leucine-rich nuclear export signal (NES)-containing proteins from the nucleus. CONCLUSIONS: The SRP is assembled in the nucleus into a complex lacking only Srp54p. It is then exported through the NES pathway into the cytoplasm where Srp54p binds to it. This transport route for a ribonucleoprotein complex is so far unique in yeast.     

Fluorescence-detected assembly of the signal recognition particle: binding of the two SRP protein heterodimers to SRP RNA is noncooperative.

Protein-RNA and protein-protein interactions involved in the assembly of the signal recognition particle (SRP) were examined using fluorescence spectroscopy. Fluorescein was covalently attached to the 3'-terminal ribose of SRP RNA following periodate oxidation, and the resulting SRP RNA-Fl was reconstituted into a fluorescent SRP species that was functional in promoting translocation of secretory proteins across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum. Each of the two protein heterodimers purified from SRP elicited a substantial change in fluorescein emission upon association with the modified RNA. The binding of SRP9/14 to singly-labeled SRP RNA-Fl increased fluorescein emission intensity by 41% at pH 7.5 and decreased its anisotropy from 0.18 to 0.16. The binding of SRP68/72 increased the fluorescein anisotropy from 0.18 to 0.23 but did not alter the emission intensity of SRP RNA-Fl. These fluorescence changes did not result from a direct interaction between the dye and protein because the fluorescein remained accessible to both iodide ions and fluorescein-specific antibodies in the complexes. The spectral changes were elicited by specific SRP RNA-protein interactions, since (i) the SRP9/14- and SRP68/72-dependent changes were unique, (ii) an excess of unlabeled SRP RNA, but not of tRNA, blocked the fluorescence changes, and (iii) no emission changes were observed when SRP RNA-Fl was titrated with other RNA-binding proteins. Each heterodimer bound tightly to the RNA, since the Kd values determined spectroscopically and at equilibrium for the SRP9/14 and the SRP68/72 complexes with SRP RNA-Fl were less than 0.1 and 7 +/- 3 nM, respectively. The binding affinity of SRP68/72 for SRP RNA-Fl was unaffected by the presence of SRP9/14, and hence the binding of the heterodimers to SRP RNA is noncooperative in the absence of SRP54 and SRP19. The SRP protein heterodimers therefore associate randomly and independently with SRP RNA to form domains in the particle that are distinct both structurally and functionally. Any cooperativity in SRP assembly would have to be mediated by SRP54 and/or SRP19.     

Signal recognition particle (SRP) stabilizes the translocation-competent conformation of pre-secretory proteins.

When affinity-purified proOmpA was diluted out of 8 M urea into a sample of yeast microsomes, it was translocated and processed in the absence of any cytosolic factors; an intact membrane and ATP were the only requirements. The translocation competence of proOmpA was lost, however, during a 15-h incubation at 0 degrees C. The competence was retained when trigger factor and a yeast cytosolic extract were present during incubations at 0 degrees C. The same reactions were carried out with affinity-purified prepro-alpha-factor, and the same results were obtained with the exception that trigger factor was not required. When the various cytosolic factors were replaced with SRP, the addition of yeast microsomes after 15 h resulted in the translocation and processing (and glycosylation) of both proOmpA and prepro-alpha-factor. Pancreatic microsomes were also used in this type of assay, and it was found that proOmpA (but not prepro-alpha-factor) could be translocated when diluted out of urea. In this case, as with yeast microsomes, translocation competence was maintained by SRP. These results show that in addition to a recognition and targeting function, SRP can stabilize the translocation-competent conformation of pre-secretory proteins in vitro for translocation across eukaryotic membranes.     

Crystal structure of SRP19 in complex with the S domain of SRP RNA and its implication for the assembly of the signal recognition particle

The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a ribonucleoprotein particle involved in GTP-dependent translocation of secretory proteins across membranes. In Archaea and Eukarya, SRP19 binds to 7SL RNA and promotes the incorporation of SRP54, which contains the binding sites for GTP, the signal peptide, and the membrane-bound SRP receptor. We have determined the crystal structure of Methanococcus jannaschii SRP19 bound to the S domain of human 7SL RNA at 2.9 A resolution. SRP19 clamps the tetraloops of two branched helices (helices 6 and 8) and allows them to interact side by side. Helix 6 acts as a splint for helix 8 and partially preorganizes the binding site for SRP54 in helix 8, thereby facilitating the binding of SRP54 in assembly.     

Structures of SRP54 and SRP19, the two proteins that organize the ribonucleic core of the signal recognition particle from Pyrococcus furiosus

In all organisms the Signal Recognition Particle (SRP), binds to signal sequences of proteins destined for secretion or membrane insertion as they emerge from translating ribosomes. In Archaea and Eucarya, the conserved ribonucleoproteic core is composed of two proteins, the accessory protein SRP19, the essential GTPase SRP54, and an evolutionarily conserved and essential SRP RNA. Through the GTP-dependent interaction between the SRP and its cognate receptor SR, ribosomes harboring nascent polypeptidic chains destined for secretion are dynamically transferred to the protein translocation apparatus at the membrane. We present here high-resolution X-ray structures of SRP54 and SRP19, the two RNA binding components forming the core of the signal recognition particle from the hyper-thermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus (Pfu). The 2.5 A resolution structure of free Pfu-SRP54 is the first showing the complete domain organization of a GDP bound full-length SRP54 subunit. In its ras-like GTPase domain, GDP is found tightly associated with the protein. The flexible linker that separates the GTPase core from the hydrophobic signal sequence binding M domain, adopts a purely alpha-helical structure and acts as an articulated arm allowing the M domain to explore multiple regions as it scans for signal peptides as they emerge from the ribosomal tunnel. This linker is structurally coupled to the GTPase catalytic site and likely to propagate conformational changes occurring in the M domain through the SRP RNA upon signal sequence binding. Two different 1.8 A resolution crystal structures of free Pfu-SRP19 reveal a compact, rigid and well-folded protein even in absence of its obligate SRP RNA partner. Comparison with other SRP19*SRP RNA structures suggests the rearrangement of a disordered loop upon binding with the RNA through a reciprocal induced-fit mechanism and supports the idea that SRP19 acts as a molecular scaffold and a chaperone, assisting the SRP RNA in adopting the conformation required for its optimal interaction with the essential subunit SRP54, and proper assembly of a functional SRP.     

S-domain assembly of the signal recognition particle

The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a phylogenetically conserved ribonucleoprotein that associates with ribosomes to mediate the targeting of membrane and secretory proteins to biological membranes. In higher eukaryotes, SRP biogenesis involves the sequential binding of SRP19 and SRP54 proteins to the S domain of 7S RNA. The recently determined crystal structures of SRP19 in complex with the S domain, and that of the ternary complex of SRP19, the S domain and the M domain of SRP54, provide insight into the molecular basis of S-domain assembly and SRP function.     

Interaction of rice and human SRP19 polypeptides with signal recognition particle RNA

The signal recognition particle (SRP) controls the transport of secretory proteins into and across lipid bilayers. SRP-like ribonucleoprotein complexes exist in all organisms, including plants. We characterized the rice SRP RNA and its primary RNA binding protein, SRP19. The secondary structure of the rice SRP RNA was similar to that found in other eukaryotes; however, as in other plant SRP RNAs, a GUUUCA hexamer sequence replaced the highly conserved GNRA-tetranucleotide loop motif at the apex of helix 8. The small domain of the rice SRP RNA was reduced considerably. Structurally, rice SRP19 lacked two small regions that can be present in other SRP19 homologues. Conservative structure prediction and site-directed mutagenesis of rice and human SRP19 polypeptides indicated that binding to the SRP RNAs occurred via a loop that is present in the N-domain of both proteins. Rice SRP19 protein was able to form a stable complex with the rice SRP RNA in vitro. Furthermore, heterologous ribonucleoprotein complexes with components of the human SRP were assembled, thus confirming a high degree of structural and functional conservation between plant and mammalian SRP components.     

Structure of the chloroplast signal recognition particle (SRP) receptor: domain arrangement modulates SRP-receptor interaction

The signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway mediates co-translational targeting of nascent proteins to membranes. Chloroplast SRP is unique in that it does not contain the otherwise universally conserved SRP RNA, which accelerates the association between the SRP guanosine-5′-triphosphate (GTP) binding protein and its receptor FtsY in classical SRP pathways. Recently, we showed that the SRP and SRP receptor (SR) GTPases from chloroplast (cpSRP54 and cpFtsY, respectively) can interact with one another 400-fold more efficiently than their bacterial homologues, thus providing an explanation as to why this novel chloroplast SRP pathway bypasses the requirement for the SRP RNA. Here we report the crystal structure of cpFtsY from Arabidopsis thaliana at 2.0 Å resolution. In this chloroplast SR, the N-terminal “N” domain is more tightly packed, and a more extensive interaction surface is formed between the GTPase “G” domain and the N domain than was previously observed in many of its bacterial homologues. As a result, the overall conformation of apo-cpFtsY is closer to that found in the bacterial SRP•FtsY complex than in free bacterial FtsY, especially with regard to the relative orientation of the N and G domains. In contrast, active-site residues in the G domain are mispositioned, explaining the low basal GTP binding and hydrolysis activity of free cpFtsY. This structure emphasizes proper N-G domain arrangement as a key factor in modulating the efficiency of SRP-receptor interaction and helps account, in part, for the faster kinetics at which the chloroplast SR interacts with its binding partner in the absence of an SRP RNA.     

Evidence for coupling of membrane targeting and function of the signal recognition particle (SRP) receptor FtsY

Recent studies have indicated that FtsY, the signal recognition particle receptor of Escherichia coli, plays a central role in membrane protein biogenesis. For proper function, FtsY must be targeted to the membrane, but its membrane-targeting pathway is unknown. We investigated the relationship between targeting and function of FtsY in vivo, by separating its catalytic domain (NG) from its putative targeting domain (A) by three means: expression of split ftsY, insertion of various spacers between A and NG, and separation of A and NG by in vivo proteolysis. Proteolytic separation of A and NG does not abolish function, whereas separation by long linkers or expression of split ftsY is detrimental. We propose that proteolytic cleavage of FtsY occurs after completion of co-translational targeting and assembly of NG. In contrast, separation by other means may interrupt proper synchronization of co-translational targeting and membrane assembly of NG. The co-translational interaction of FtsY with the membrane was confirmed by in vitro experiments.     

Compartmentalization directs assembly of the signal recognition particle

Many ribonucleoprotein complexes assemble stepwise in distinct cellular compartments, a process that usually involves bidirectional transport of both RNA and proteins between the nucleus and cytoplasm. The biological rationale for such complex transport steps in RNP assembly is obscure. One important example is the eukaryotic signal recognition particle (SRP), a cytoplasmic RNP consisting of one RNA and six proteins. Prior in vivo studies support an "SRP54-late" assembly model in which all SRP proteins, except SRP54, are imported from the cytoplasm to the nucleus to bind SRP RNA. This partially assembled complex is then exported to the cytoplasm where SRP54 binds and forms the SRP holocomplex. Here we show that native SRP assembly requires segregated and ordered binding by its protein components. A native ternary complex forms in vitro when SRP19 binds the SRP RNA prior to binding by SRP54, which approximates the eukaryotic cellular pathway. In contrast, the presence of SRP54 disrupts native assembly of SRP19, such that two RNA-binding loops in SRP19 misfold. These results imply that SRP54 must be sequestered during early SRP assembly steps, as apparently occurs in vivo, for proper assembly of the SRP to occur. Our findings emphasize that spatial compartmentalization provides an additional level of regulation that prevents competition among components and can function to promote native assembly of the eukaryotic SRP.