Novel blunt-end addition reactions catalyzed by DNA polymerase I of Escherichia coli

DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment) of Escherichia coli catalyzes the addition of deoxynucleotides to 3' hydroxyl termini of blunt-ended DNA fragments. The product of the reaction, which we call +1 addition, is found only in very low yield under conditions that permit editing by the 3'----5' exonuclease activity of the wild-type polymerase. A mutant form of the Klenow fragment that lacks detectable 3'----5' exonuclease activity shows an elevated accumulation of the +1 addition product. The mutant enzyme can use any one of the four dNTPs to carry out the reaction when each precursor is provided individually. However, in the presence of all four dNTPs the addition of dATP is strongly preferred. Suppression of the editing function of the wild-type polymerase through the use of high concentrations of exogenous deoxynucleoside monophosphates also results in a significant increase in the amount of +1 addition product formed. The presence of a high dNMP concentration also alters the specificity of the nucleotide addition reaction carried out by the wild-type enzyme. Thus, in addition to dATP, the dNTP which is complementary to the exogenous deoxynucleoside monophosphate, is also used in the +1 addition reaction. A similar effect of dNMPs on the specificity of nucleotide addition was obtained with the mutant Klenow fragment. These results define two pathways for the +1 addition reaction: one that does not require coding information from the DNA template and a second in which coding information is provided by the exogenous dNMP.     

Family A and family B DNA polymerases are structurally related: evolutionary implications.

In order to establish the evolutionary relationship between the family A and B DNA polymerases, we have closely compared the 3'-->5' exonuclease domains between the Klenow fragment of E.coli DNA polymerase I (a family A DNA polymerase) and the bacteriophage PRD1 DNA polymerase, the smallest member of the DNA polymerase family B. Although the PRD1 DNA polymerase has a smaller 3'-->5' exonuclease domain, its active sites appear to be very similar to those of the Klenow fragment. Site-directed mutagenesis studies revealed that the residues important for the 3'-->5' exonuclease activity, particularly metal binding ligands for the Klenow fragment, are all conserved in the PRD1 DNA polymerase as well. The metal binding ligands are also essential for the strand-displacement activity of the PRD1 DNA polymerase. Based on these results and the studies by others in various systems, we conclude that family A and B DNA polymerases, at least in the 3'-->5' exonuclease domain, are structurally as well as evolutionarily related.     

3′–5′ exonuclease activity of human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 towards DNAs containing dNMP and their modified analogs at the 3′ end of single strand DNA break

Human DNA apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP-) endonuclease 1 (APE1) is involved in the base excision repair (BER) pathway. The enzyme hydrolyzes DNA from the 5 side of the AP site. In addition to endonuclease activity, APE1 also possesses other slight activities including 3 -5 exonuclease activity. The latter is preferentially exhibited towards mispaired (non-canonical) nucleotides, this being the reason why APE1 is considered as a proofreading enzyme correcting the misincorporations introduced by DNA polymerase beta. We have studied 3 -5 exonuclease activity of APE1 towards dCMP and dTMP residues and modified dCMP analogs with photoreactive groups at the 3 end of the nicked DNA. Photoreactive dNMP residues were incorporated at the 3 end of the lesion using DNA polymerase beta and photoreactive dNTPs. The dependence of exonuclease activity on the "canonicity" of the base pair formed by dNMP flanking the nick at the 3 end, on the nature of the group flanking the nick at the 5 end, and on the reaction conditions has been determined. Optimal reaction conditions for the 3 -5 exonuclease hydrolysis reaction catalyzed by APE1 in vitro have been established, and conditions when photoreactive residues are not removed by APE1 have been chosen. These reaction conditions are suitable for using photoreactive nicked DNAs bearing 3 -photoreactive dNMP residues for photoaffinity labeling of proteins in cellular/nuclear extracts and model APE1-containing systems. We recommend using FAPdCTP for photoaffinity modification in APE1-containing systems because the FAPdCMP residue is less prone to exonuclease degradation, in contrast to FABOdCTP, which is not recommended.     

A domain of the Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I has polymerase but no exonuclease activity

The Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I from Escherichia coli has two enzymatic activities: DNA polymerase and 3'-5' exonuclease. The crystal structure showed that the fragment is folded into two distinct domains. The smaller domain has a binding site for deoxynucleoside monophosphate and a divalent metal ion that is thought to identify the 3'-5' exonuclease active site. The larger C-terminal domain contains a deep cleft that is believed to bind duplex DNA. Several lines of evidence suggested that the large domain also contains the polymerase active site. To test this hypothesis, we have cloned the DNA coding for the large domain into an expression system and purified the protein product. We find that the C-terminal domain has polymerase activity (albeit at a lower specific activity than the native Klenow fragment) but no measurable 3'-5' exonuclease activity. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that each of the three enzymatic activities of DNA polymerase I from E. coli resides on a separate protein structural domain.     

Interaction of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I with azidoDNA and fluorescent DNA probes: identification of protein-DNA contacts

The synthesis of an azidoDNA duplex and its use to photolabel DNA polymerases have been previously described (Gibson & Benkovic, 1987). We now present detailed experiments utilizing this azidoDNA photoprobe as a substrate for Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment) and the photoaffinity labeling of the protein. The azidoDNA duplex is an efficient substrate for both the polymerase and 3'----5' exonuclease activities of the enzyme. However, the hydrolytic degradation of the azido-bearing base is dramatically impaired. On the basis of the ability of these duplexes to photolabel the enzyme, we have determined that the protein contacts between five and seven bases of duplex DNA. Incubation of azidoDNA with the Klenow fragment in the presence of magnesium results in the in situ formation of a template-primer with the azido-bearing base bound at the polymerase catalytic site of the enzyme. Photolysis of this complex followed by proteolytic digestion and isolation of DNA-labeled peptides results in the identification of a single residue modified by the photoreactive DNA substrate. We identify Tyr766 as the modified amino acid and thus localize the catalytic site for polymerization in the protein. A mansyl-labeled DNA duplex has been prepared as a fluorescent probe of protein structure. This has been utilized to determine the location of the primer terminus when bound to the Klenow fragment. When the duplex contains five unpaired bases in the primer strand of the duplex, the primer terminus resides predominantly at the exonuclease catalytic site of the enzyme. Removal of the mismatched bases by the exonuclease activity of the enzyme yields a binary complex with the primer terminus now bound predominantly at the polymerase active site. Data are presented which suggest that the rate-limiting step in the exonuclease activity of the enzyme is translocation of the primer terminus from polymerase to exonuclease catalytic sites.     

How DNA travels between the separate polymerase and 3'-5'-exonuclease sites of DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment)

The polymerase and 3'-5'-exonuclease activities of the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I are located on separate structural domains of the protein, separated by about 30 A. To determine whether a DNA primer terminus can move from one active site to the other without dissociation of the enzyme-DNA complex, we carried out reactions on a labeled DNA substrate in the presence of a large excess of unlabeled DNA, to limit observations to a single enzyme-DNA encounter. The results indicated that while Klenow fragment is capable of intramolecular shuttling of a DNA substrate between the two catalytic sites, the intermolecular pathway involving enzyme-DNA dissociation can also be used. Thus, there is nothing in the protein structure or the reaction mechanism that dictates a particular means of moving the DNA substrate. Instead, the use of the intermolecular or the intramolecular pathway is determined by the competition between the polymerase or exonuclease reaction and DNA dissociation. When the substrate has a mispaired primer terminus, DNA dissociation seems generally more rapid than exonucleolytic digestion. Thus, Klenow fragment edits its own polymerase errors by a predominantly intermolecular process, involving dissociation of the enzyme-DNA complex and reassociation of the DNA with the exonuclease site of a second molecule of Klenow fragment.     

Determinants of DNA mismatch recognition within the polymerase domain of the Klenow fragment.

The Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I catalyzes template-directed synthesis of DNA and uses a separate 3'-5' exonuclease activity to edit misincorporated bases. The polymerase and exonuclease activities are contained in separate structural domains. In this study, nine Klenow fragment derivatives containing mutations within the polymerase domain were examined for their interaction with model primer-template duplexes. The partitioning of the DNA primer terminus between the polymerase and 3'-5' exonuclease active sites of the mutant proteins was assessed by time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy, utilizing a dansyl fluorophore attached to the DNA. Mutation of N845 or R668 disrupted favorable interactions between the Klenow fragment and a duplex containing a matched terminal base pair but had little effect when the terminus was mismatched. Thus, N845 and R668 are required for recognition of correct terminal base pairs in the DNA substrate. Mutation of N675, R835, R836, or R841 resulted in tighter polymerase site binding of DNA, suggesting that the side chains of these residues induce strain in the DNA and/or protein backbone. A double mutant (N675A/R841A) showed an even greater polymerase site partitioning than was displayed by either single mutation, indicating that such strain is additive. In both groups of mutant proteins, the ability to discriminate between duplexes containing matched or mismatched base pairs was impaired. In contrast, mutation of K758 or Q849 had no effect on partitioning relative to wild type, regardless of DNA mismatch character. These results demonstrate that DNA mismatch recognition is dependent on specific amino acid residues within the polymerase domain and is not governed solely by thermodynamic differences between correct and mismatched base pairs. Moreover, this study suggests a mechanism whereby the Klenow fragment is able to recognize polymerase errors following a misincorporation event, leading to their eventual removal by the 3'-5' exonuclease activity.     

DNA substrate structural requirements for the exonuclease and polymerase activities of procaryotic and phage DNA polymerases

A DNA duplex covalently cross-linked between specific bases has been prepared. This and similar duplexes are substrates for the polymerase and exonuclease activities of the Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I and T4 and T7 DNA polymerases. The action of Klenow fragment on these duplexes indicates that the polymerase site does not require that the DNA duplex undergo strand separation for activity, whereas the exonuclease site requires that at least four base pairs of the primer strand must melt out for the exonucleolytic removal of nucleotides from the primer terminus. The exonucleolytic action of T4 and T7 DNA polymerases requires that only two and three bases respectively melt out for excision of nucleotides from the primer terminus. Klenow fragment and T4 DNA polymerase are able to polymerize onto duplexes incapable of strand separation, whereas T7 DNA polymerase seems to require that the primer terminus be at least three bases from the cross-linked base pair. A DNA duplex with a biotin covalently linked to a specific base has been prepared. In the presence of the biotin binding protein avidin, the exonucleolytic activity of Klenow fragment requires that the primer terminus be at least 15 base pairs downstream from the base with the biotin-avidin complex. On the other hand, the polymerase activity of Klenow fragment required that the primer terminus be at least six base pairs downstream from the base with the biotin-avidin complex. These results suggest that the polymerase and exonuclease sites of Klenow are physically separate in solution and exhibit different substrate structural requirements for activity.     

A simple method for 3'-labeling of RNA.

We describe a simple method for 3'-end labeling RNAs of known sequence. A short DNA template is designed to anneal to the 3'-end of the RNA, with a two nucleotide 5' overhang of 3'-TA-5', 3'-TG-5' or 3'-TC-5'. The Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I can then cleanly and efficiently extend the 3'-end of the RNA by the incorporation of a single alpha-32P-labeled dATP residue. This method can be used to label one RNA in a mixture of RNAs, or to label 5'-blocked RNAs such as mRNA.     

Resonance energy transfer measurements between substrate binding sites within the large (Klenow) fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I

Resonance energy transfer was used to determine separation distances between fluorescent derivatives of substrates for Klenow fragment and a unique sulfhydryl, cysteine 907, on the enzyme. Fluorescent derivatives of duplex DNA, deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTP), and deoxynucleotide monophosphates (dNMP), modified with aminonaphthalenesulfonates (ANS), served as energy-transfer donors to the fluorophore used to modify cysteine 907, 4-[N-[(iodoacetoxy)ethyl]-N-methylamino]-7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole (IANBD). The labeling of cysteine 907 with NBD caused no decrease in the enzyme's polymerase activity, suggesting that the probe did not significantly alter the conformation of the enzyme. The efficiency of singlet-singlet resonance energy transfer was determined from the quantum yield of the donor in the presence and absence of acceptor. By F?rster's theory, the measured distances between cysteine 907 and binding sites for duplex DNA, dNTP, and dNMP were 25-39, 19-28, and 17-26 A, respectively. As the fluorophores, attached to the substrates via a tether arm, are separated from the substrates by approximately 12 A, the distances measured between binding sites are subject to this uncertainty. To measure the separation between binding sites for duplex DNA and dNMP, and to reduce the uncertainty introduced by the tether arm, two experiments were carried out. In the first, duplex DNA was labeled with the acceptor fluorophore NBD and used with the donor ANS-modified dNMP to yield a measured distance separating these two sites of 19-28 A.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The proofreading 3'-->5' exonuclease activity of DNA polymerases: a kinetic barrier to translesion DNA synthesis

The 3'-->5' exonuclease activity intrinsic to several DNA polymerases plays a primary role in genetic stability; it acts as a first line of defense in correcting DNA polymerase errors. A mismatched basepair at the primer terminus is the preferred substrate for the exonuclease activity over a correct basepair. The efficiency of the exonuclease as a proofreading activity for mispairs containing a DNA lesion varies, however, being dependent upon both the DNA polymerase/exonuclease and the type of DNA lesion. The exonuclease activities intrinsic to the T4 polymerase (family B) and DNA polymerase gamma (family A) proofread DNA mispairs opposite endogenous DNA lesions, including alkylation, oxidation, and abasic adducts. However, the exonuclease of the Klenow polymerase cannot discriminate between correct and incorrect bases opposite alkylation and oxidative lesions. DNA damage alters the dynamics of the intramolecular partitioning of DNA substrates between the 3'-->5' exonuclease and polymerase activities. Enzymatic idling at lesions occurs when an exonuclease activity efficiently removes the same base that is preferentially incorporated by the DNA polymerase activity. Thus, the exonuclease activity can also act as a kinetic barrier to translesion synthesis (TLS) by preventing the stable incorporation of bases opposite DNA lesions. Understanding the downstream consequences of exonuclease activity at DNA lesions is necessary for elucidating the mechanisms of translesion synthesis and damage-induced cytotoxicity.     

The proofreading 3′→5′ exonuclease activity of DNA polymerases: a kinetic barrier to translesion DNA synthesis

The 3′→5′ exonuclease activity intrinsic to several DNA polymerases plays a primary role in genetic stability; it acts as a first line of defense in correcting DNA polymerase errors. A mismatched basepair at the primer terminus is the preferred substrate for the exonuclease activity over a correct basepair. The efficiency of the exonuclease as a proofreading activity for mispairs containing a DNA lesion varies, however, being dependent upon both the DNA polymerase/exonuclease and the type of DNA lesion. The exonuclease activities intrinsic to the T4 polymerase (family B) and DNA polymerase γ (family A) proofread DNA mispairs opposite endogenous DNA lesions, including alkylation, oxidation, and abasic adducts. However, the exonuclease of the Klenow polymerase cannot discriminate between correct and incorrect bases opposite alkylation and oxidative lesions. DNA damage alters the dynamics of the intramolecular partitioning of DNA substrates between the 3′→5′ exonuclease and polymerase activities. Enzymatic idling at lesions occurs when an exonuclease activity efficiently removes the same base that is preferentially incorporated by the DNA polymerase activity. Thus, the exonuclease activity can also act as a kinetic barrier to translesion synthesis (TLS) by preventing the stable incorporation of bases opposite DNA lesions. Understanding the downstream consequences of exonuclease activity at DNA lesions is necessary for elucidating the mechanisms of translesion synthesis and damage-induced cytotoxicity.     

Characterization of 3''----5'' exonuclease associated with DNA polymerase of silkworm nuclear polyhedrosis virus.

3'----5' Exonuclease specific for single-stranded DNA copurified with DNA polymerase of nuclear polyhedrosis virus of silkworm Bombyx mori (BmNPV Pol). BmNPV Pol has no detectable 5'----3' exonuclease activity on single-stranded or duplex DNA. Analysis of the products of 3'----5' exonucleolytic reaction showed that deoxynucleoside monophosphates were released during the hydrolysis of single-stranded DNA. The exonuclease activity cosedimented with the polymerase activity during ultracentrifugation of BmNPV Pol in glycerol gradient. The polymerase and the exonuclease activities of BmNPV Pol were inactivated by heat with nearly identical kinetics. The mode of the hydrolysis of single-stranded DNA by BmNPV Pol-associated exonuclease was strictly distributive. The enzyme dissociated from single-stranded DNA after the release of a single dNMP and then reassociated with a next polynucleotide being degradated.     

Affinity modification of DNA polymerase I from Escherichia coli and its Klenow fragment with nucleotide imidazolides

Affinity modification of E. coli DNA polymerase I and its Klenow fragment by imidazolides of dNMP (Im-dNMP) and dNTP was studied. DNA polymerase activity of DNA polymerase I was reduced by both Im-dNMP and Im-dNTP. However Im-dNTP does not inactivate of the Klenow fragment. The level of covalent labelling of both enzymes by radioactive Im-dNTP did not exceed 0.01 mol of reagent per mol of enzyme. But the deep inactivation of DNA polymerase I by Im-dNTP was observed. It is likely that this inactivation is due to the formation of intramolecular ether followed by phosphorylation of the carboxyl group. This assumption is strongly supported by the increase of the isoelectrical point of DNA polymerase I after its incubation with Im-dNTP in conditions of enzyme inactivation. All data permit us to suggest that the affinity modification of both enzymes by Im-dNMP and covalent labeling by Im-dNTP takes place without complementary binding of dNTP moiety with the template. However inactivation of DNA polymerase I by Im-dNTP occurs only if the dNTP-moiety is complementary to the template in the template.primer complex. It was shown that His residue was phosphorylated by Im-dNMP and Tyr or Ser residues between Met-802 and Met-848 were phosphorylated by Im-dNTP. We suppose that there are two states of DNA polymerase active site for the binding of dNTPs. One of them is independent on the template, in the other state the dNTP hydrogen bond with the template is formed.