Drosophila Smad2 Opposes Mad Signaling during Wing Vein Development

In the vertebrates, the BMP/Smad1 and TGF-β/Smad2 signaling pathways execute antagonistic functions in different contexts of development. The differentiation of specific structures results from the balance between these two pathways. For example, the gastrula organizer/node of the vertebrates requires a region of low Smad1 and high Smad2 signaling. In Drosophila, Mad regulates tissue determination and growth in the wing, but the function of dSmad2 in wing patterning is largely unknown. In this study, we used an RNAi loss-of-function approach to investigate dSmad2 signaling during wing development. RNAi-mediated knockdown of dSmad2 caused formation of extra vein tissue, with phenotypes similar to those seen in Dpp/Mad gain-of-function. Clonal analyses revealed that the normal function of dSmad2 is to inhibit the response of wing intervein cells to the extracellular Dpp morphogen gradient that specifies vein formation, as measured by expression of the activated phospho-Mad protein. The effect of dSmad2 depletion in promoting vein differentiation was dependent on Medea, the co-factor shared by Mad and dSmad2. Furthermore, double RNAi experiments showed that Mad is epistatic to dSmad2. In other words, depletion of Smad2 had no effect in Mad-deficient wings. Our results demonstrate a novel role for dSmad2 in opposing Mad-mediated vein formation in the wing. We propose that the main function of dActivin/dSmad2 in Drosophila wing development is to antagonize Dpp/Mad signaling. Possible molecular mechanisms for the opposition between dSmad2 and Mad signaling are discussed.     

Repression of dpp targets by binding of brinker to mad sites

Signaling by decapentaplegic (Dpp), a Drosophila member of the transforming growth factor (TGF) beta superfamily of growth factors, has recently been shown to activate targets such as vestigial (vg) indirectly through negative regulation of brinker (brk). Here we show that the Brk protein functions as a repressor by binding to Dpp response elements. The Brk DNA binding activity was localized to an amino-terminal region containing a putative homeodomain. Brk bound to a Dpp response element of the Ultrabithorax (Ubx) midgut enhancer at a sequence that overlaps a binding site for the Smad protein, Mothers Against Dpp (Mad). Furthermore, Brk was able to compete with Mad for occupancy of this binding site. This recognition of overlapping binding sites provides a potential explanation for why the G/C-rich Mad binding site consensus differs the Smad3/Smad4 binding site consensus. We also found that the Dpp response element from Ubx was more sensitive than the vg quadrant enhancer to repression by Brk. This difference correlates with short-range activation of Ubx by Dpp in the visceral mesoderm, whereas vg exhibits a long-range response to Dpp in the wing imaginal disc, indicating that Brk binding sites may play a critical role in limiting thresholds for activation by Dpp. Finally, we provide evidence that Brk is capable of functioning as an active repressor. Thus, whereas Brk and Mad compete for regulation of Ubx and vg, Brk may regulate other Dpp targets without direct involvement of Mad.     

Flexible interaction of Drosophila Smad complexes with bipartite binding sites

A subset of BMP-responsive enhancer elements are characterized by pairing of a GC-rich Smad1 binding site and an SBE-type Smad4 binding site. Such paired, or bipartite, sites are in some cases just 5 bp apart and thus might be contacted by a single Smad1-Smad4 complex. Other potential pairings are separated as much as 60 bp but it is not known whether such longer distances can be spanned by a Smad1-Smad4 complex, indeed binding of native Smad1-Smad4 complexes to any of these bipartite elements has yet to be reported. Here we report that a complex of the homologous Drosophila Smad proteins, Mad and Medea, is capable of concerted binding to GC-rich and SBE sites separated by as much as 20 bp. The wider the separation, the more severely binding affinity was reduced by shortening of the linker region that tethers the DNA binding domain of Medea. In contrast, length of the Mad linker did not affect the allowed distance between paired sites, rather it contributes specifically to Mad contact with the GC-rich site. Finally, we show that Smad1 and Smad4 can participate in binding to bipartite sites.     

Disorder in a target for the smad2 mad homology 2 domain and its implications for binding and specificity

The Smad2 Mad homology 2 (MH2) domain binds to a diverse group of proteins which do not share a common sequence motif. We have used NMR to investigate the structure of one of these interacting proteins, the Smad binding domain (SBD) of Smad anchor for receptor activation (SARA). Our results indicate that the unbound SBD is highly disordered and forms no stable secondary or tertiary structures. Additionally we have used fluorescence binding studies to study the interaction between the MH2 domain and SBD and find that no region of the SBD dominates the interaction between the MH2 and the SBD. Our results are consistent with a series of hydrophobic patches on the MH2 that are able to recognize disordered regions of proteins. These findings elucidate a mechanism by which a single domain (MH2) can specifically recognize a diverse set of proteins which are unrelated by sequence, lead to a clearer picture of how MH2 domains function in the transforming growth factor-beta-signaling pathway and suggest possible mechanisms for controlling interactions with MH2 domains.     

A novel function of Drosophila eIF4A as a negative regulator of Dpp/BMP signalling that mediates SMAD degradation

Signalling by the TGF-beta superfamily member and BMP orthologue Decapentaplegic (Dpp) is crucial for multiple developmental programmes and has to be tightly regulated. Here, we demonstrate that the Drosophila Dpp pathway is negatively regulated by eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A (eIF4A), which mediates activation-dependent degradation of the Dpp signalling components Mad and Medea. eIF4A mutants exhibit increased Dpp signalling and accumulation of Mad and phospho-Mad. Overexpression of eIF4A decreases Dpp signalling and causes loss of Mad and phospho-Mad. Furthermore, eIF4A physically associates with Mad and Medea, and promotes their degradation following activation of Dpp signalling in a translation-independent manner. Finally, we show that eIF4A acts synergistically with, but independently of, the ubiquitin ligase DSmurf, indicating that a dual system controls SMAD degradation. Thus, in addition to being an obligatory component of the cap-dependent translation initiation complex, eIF4A has a novel function as a specific inhibitor of Dpp signalling that mediates the degradation of SMAD homologues.     

Nkx-2.5 gene induction in mice is mediated by a Smad consensus regulatory region

In the forming vertebrate heart, bone morphogenetic protein signaling induces expression of the early cardiac regulatory gene nkx-2.5. A similar regulatory interaction has been defined in Drosophila embryos where Dpp signaling mediated by the Smad homologues Mad and Medea directly regulates early cardiac expression of tinman. A conserved cluster of Smad consensus binding sequences was identified in early cardiac regulatory sequences of the mouse nkx-2.5 gene. The importance of the nkx-2.5 Smad consensus region in early cardiac gene expression was examined in transgenic mice and in cultured mouse embryos. In transgenic mice, deletion of the Smad consensus region delays induction of embryonic DeltaSmadnkx-2.5/lacZ gene expression during early heart formation. Induction of DeltaSmadnkx-2.5/lacZ expression is also delayed in the outflow tract myocardium and visceral mesoderm. Targeted mutation of the three Smad consensus sequences inhibited nkx-2.5/lacZ expression in the cardiac crescent, demonstrating a specific requirement for the Smad consensus sites in early cardiac gene induction. Cultured DeltaSmadnkx-2.5/lacZ transgenic mouse embryos also exhibit delayed induction of transgene expression. In the four-chambered heart, deletion of the Smad consensus region resulted in expanded DeltaSmadnkx-2.5/lacZ transgene expression. Thus, the nkx-2.5 Smad consensus region can have positive or negative regulatory function, depending on the developmental context and cellular environment.     

The N domain of Smad7 is essential for specific inhibition of transforming growth factor-beta signaling.

Inhibitory Smads (I-Smads) repress signaling by cytokines of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily. I-Smads have conserved carboxy-terminal Mad homology 2 (MH2) domains, whereas the amino acid sequences of their amino-terminal regions (N domains) are highly divergent from those of other Smads. Of the two different I-Smads in mammals, Smad7 inhibited signaling by both TGF-beta and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), whereas Smad6 was less effective in inhibiting TGF-beta signaling. Analyses using deletion mutants and chimeras of Smad6 and Smad7 revealed that the MH2 domains were responsible for the inhibition of both TGF-beta and BMP signaling by I-Smads, but the isolated MH2 domains of Smad6 and Smad7 were less potent than the full-length Smad7 in inhibiting TGF-beta signaling. The N domains of I-Smads determined the subcellular localization of these molecules. Chimeras containing the N domain of Smad7 interacted with the TGF-beta type I receptor (TbetaR-I) more efficiently, and were more potent in repressing TGF-beta signaling, than those containing the N domain of Smad6. The isolated N domain of Smad7 physically interacted with the MH2 domain of Smad7, and enhanced the inhibitory activity of the latter through facilitating interaction with TGF-beta receptors. The N domain of Smad7 thus plays an important role in the specific inhibition of TGF-beta signaling.