Müllerian inhibiting substance regulates its receptor/SMAD signaling and causes mesenchymal transition of the coelomic epithelial cells early in Müllerian duct regression

Examination of Müllerian inhibiting substance (MIS) signaling in the rat in vivo and in vitro revealed novel developmental stage- and tissue-specific events that contributed to a window of MIS responsiveness in Müllerian duct regression. The MIS type II receptor (MISRII)-expressing cells are initially present in the coelomic epithelium of both male and female urogenital ridges, and then migrate into the mesenchyme surrounding the male Müllerian duct under the influence of MIS. Expression of the genes encoding MIS type I receptors, Alk2 and Alk3, is also spatiotemporally controlled; Alk2 expression appears earlier and increases predominantly in the coelomic epithelium, whereas Alk3 expression appears later and is restricted to the mesenchyme, suggesting sequential roles in Müllerian duct regression. MIS induces expression of Alk2, Alk3 and Smad8, but downregulates Smad5 in the urogenital ridge. Alk2-specific small interfering RNA (siRNA) blocks both the transition of MISRII expression from the coelomic epithelium to the mesenchyme and Müllerian duct regression in organ culture. Müllerian duct regression can also be inhibited or accelerated by siRNA targeting Smad8 and Smad5, respectively. Thus, the early action of MIS is to initiate an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of MISRII-expressing cells and to specify the components of the receptor/SMAD signaling pathway by differentially regulating their expression.     

β-Catenin is essential for Müllerian duct regression during male sexual differentiation

During male sexual differentiation, the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling molecule anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH; also known as Müllerian inhibiting substance, MIS) is secreted by the fetal testes and induces regression of the Müllerian ducts, the primordia of the female reproductive tract organs. Currently, the molecular identity of downstream events regulated by the AMH signaling pathway remains unclear. We found that male-specific Wnt4 expression in mouse Müllerian duct mesenchyme depends upon AMH signaling, implicating the WNT pathway as a downstream mediator of Müllerian duct regression. Inactivation of β-catenin, a mediator of the canonical WNT pathway, did not affect AMH signaling activation in the Müllerian duct mesenchyme, but did block Müllerian duct regression. These data suggest that β-catenin mediates AMH signaling for Müllerian duct regression during male sexual differentiation.     

Identification of differentially expressed genes involved in the regression and development of the chicken Müllerian duct

Müllerian ducts of male chickens undergo regression around day 12 of incubation, but the underlining mechanisms remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that contribute to regression of the Müllerian duct in the chicken. We first employed annealing control primer-based RT-PCR to screen candidate genes differentially expressed in the Müllerian ducts between male and female. Four differentially expressed genes (MSX2, GAL10, VCP and PLCH1) were partially sequenced. The expression of mRNA of the latter genes and MSX1 in the male and female Müllerian ducts were compared at 7.5, 8 and 9 days of incubation using semi-quantitative RT-PCR. The results indicated that both MSX1 and MSX2 mRNA was highly expressed in the male Müllerian duct at day 9 of incubation, whereas, PLCH1 mRNA was lower in the male duct at day 9 of incubation compared to that of the female duct. Although VCP mRNA was expressed in both left and right female Müllerian ducts, no expression was detected in the male duct. Whole mount in situ hybridyzation analysis showed that the expression of MSX1 and MSX2 mRNA were localized specifically in the mesenchymal cells of the male Müllerian duct at day 9 of incubation. In contrast, VCP mRNA expression was observed in both mesenchymal and epithelial cells of the female Müllerian duct but not detected in the male duct. These results suggest that both up-regulation of MSX1 and MSX2 mRNA expression is involved in the regression of the Müllerian duct in male chicken embryo, whereas VCP expression is involved in development of the female duct.     

Cellular mechanisms of Müllerian duct formation in the mouse

Regardless of their sex chromosome karyotype, amniotes develop two pairs of genital ducts, the Wolffian and Müllerian ducts. As the Müllerian duct forms, its growing tip is intimately associated with the Wolffian duct as it elongates to the urogenital sinus. Previous studies have shown that the presence of the Wolffian duct is required for the development and maintenance of the Müllerian duct. The Müllerian duct is known to form by invagination of the coelomic epithelium, but the mechanism for its elongation to the urogenital sinus remains to be defined. Using genetic fate mapping, we demonstrate that the Wolffian duct does not contribute cells to the Müllerian duct. Experimental embryological manipulations and molecular studies show that precursor cells at the caudal tip of the Müllerian duct proliferate to deposit a cord of cells along the length of the urogenital ridge. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis reveals that the cells of the developing Müllerian duct are mesoepithelial when deposited, and subsequently differentiate into an epithelial tube and eventually the female reproductive tract. Our studies define cellular and molecular mechanisms for Müllerian duct formation.     

Contacts between Wolffian and Müllerian cells at the tip of the outgrowing Müllerian duct in rat embryos

The developing Müllerian duct was studied at the light microscopic as well as the electron microscopic level in rat embryos, especially in the section of the terminal bud and its tip, where Wolffian and Müllerian duct are enclosed by a common basal membrane. In this zone desmosomes can be found among Wolffian cells and also among Müllerian cells. In addition, we found cell contacts between Müllerian and Wolffian cells, namely short electron-dense segments on adjacent surfaces or disc-shaped thickenings within opposite plasma membranes, as well as fusions of the plasmalemmata over short distances. Until now, these cell contacts have not been described in rat embryos.     

Biosynthesis and secretion of fibronectin in the cultured mesenchymal cells of the developing chick müllerian duct

We have developed a method to separate and isolate the mesenchymal cells from the epithelial cells in the left Müllerian duct of the developing chick. We then cultured the mesenchymal cells in a serum-free medium. Through an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, we detected fibronectin synthesis and release into the medium at stages of Müllerian duct development. Our results demonstrate that the amount of fibronectin secreted by cultured cells gradually decreased in accordance with Müllerian duct differentiation. Similar observations found in the developing embryonic intestine indicate that the highest fibronectin synthesis occurs during early stages of development, when morphogenetic movement and mesenchymal-epithelial interaction are prominent features of embryonic organ differentiation and growth.     

Essential roles of mesenchyme-derived beta-catenin in mouse Müllerian duct morphogenesis

Members of the Wnt family of genes such as Wnt4, Wnt5a, and Wnt7a have been implicated in the formation and morphogenesis of the Müllerian duct into various parts of the female reproductive tract. These WNT ligands elicit their action via either the canonical WNT/beta-catenin or the non-canonical WNT/calcium pathway and could possibly function redundantly in Müllerian duct differentiation. By using the Müllerian duct-specific anti-Müllerian hormone receptor 2 cre (Amhr2-cre) mouse line, we established a conditional knockout model that removed beta-catenin specifically in the mesenchyme of the Müllerian duct. At birth, loss of beta-catenin in the Müllerian duct mesenchyme disrupted the normal coiling of the oviduct in the knockout embryo, resembling the phenotype of the Wnt7a knockout. The overall development of the female reproductive tract was stunted at birth with a decrease in proliferation in the mesenchyme and epithelium. We also discovered that Wnt5a and Wnt7a expression remained normal, excluding the possibility that the phenotypes resulted from a loss of these WNT ligands. We examined the expression of Frizzled (Fzd), the receptors for WNT, and found that Fzd1 is one receptor present in the Müllerian duct mesenchyme and could be the putative receptor for beta-catenin activation in the Müllerian duct. In summary, our findings suggest that mesenchymal beta-catenin is a downstream effector of Wnt7a that mediates the patterning of the oviduct and proper differentiation of the uterus.     

Müllerian inhibiting substance is present in testes of dogs with persistent müllerian duct syndrome

Breeding studies in a strain of miniature schnauzer dogs with Persistent Müllerian Duct Syndrome (PMDS) indicate this syndrome is inherited as an autosomal recessive trait, as it is in man. Testes of neonatal dogs affected with PMDS and normal male littermates were examined for Müllerian Inhibiting Substance (MIS) production by immunohistochemistry and bioassay. MIS immunoactivity was detected in Sertoli cells of normal and affected pups using an avidin-biotin complex-enhanced method. Rat embryonic Müllerian ducts regressed when cocultured with testis fragments of both normal and affected pups in a graded organ culture bioassay, demonstrating that the MIS produced was bioactive. These findings indicate that Müllerian duct persistence in affected dogs is not due to a mutation in the structural gene for MIS, but rather, by inference, to a failure of response to MIS at the receptor level.     

Timing and irreversibility of Müllerian duct inhibition in the embryonic reproductive tract of the human male

A study was undertaken to determine (1) the effects of endogenous Müllerian inhibiting substance (MIS) on the developing human fetal genital tract; (2) the time in fetal life when MIS is first capable of inhibiting the growth of the embryonic Müllerian ducts; and (3) the reversibility of the effects of MIS on the developing male Müllerian ducts. Human fetal reproductive tracts were transplanted and grown for sustained periods in vivo in athymic nude mice. The genital tracts from 12 male human fetuses, ages 51 to 68 days postovulation, were grafted without their associated gonads into castrated murine hosts and grown for 30 to 70 days. Controls consisted of genital tracts from 8 female human fetuses, ages day 53 to 70 that were grown under identical conditions. Male specimens grew to approximately one-half the size of female specimens and disclosed varying degrees of inhibition of the Müllerian duct system from absence of the Müllerian ducts in older specimens (after Day 63) to poorly segregated segments of stroma as the mildest defect (less than Day 61). It is concluded that (1) MIS secretion by the embryonic testes probably begins before Day 51 of gestation; (2) the effects of MIS are progressive during the so-called critical window; (3) the effects of MIS are permanent; and (4) the mesenchyme is an important target of MIS.     

Variants of the anti-Müllerian hormone gene in a compound heterozygote with the persistent Müllerian duct syndrome and his family

Summary The human genome contains a large number of interspersed simple repeat sequences that are variable in length and can therefore serve as highly informative, polymorphic markers. Typing procedures include conventional multilocus and single locus probing, and polymerase chain reaction aided analysis. We have identified simple sequences in a cosmid clone stemming from the human Y chromosome and consisting of (gata)_n repeats. We have compared these with two equivalent simple repeat loci from chromosome 12. After amplifying the tandemly repeated motifs, we detected between four and eight different alleles at each of the three loci. Codominant inheritance of the alleles was established in family studies and the informativity of the simple repeat loci was determined by typing unrelated individuals. The polymorphisms are suitable for application in linkage studies, practical forensic case work, deficiency cases in paternity determination, and for studying ethnological questions. The mutational mechanisms that bring about changes in simple repeats located both on the autosomes and on the sex chromosomes, are discussed.Professor Dr. Otto Prokop (Humboldt-Universität Berlin) on the occasion of his 70th birthday     

Causes and Consequences of a Lack of Coevolution in Müllerian mimicry

Müllerian mimicry, in which both partners are unpalatable to predators, is often used as an example of a coevolved mutualism. However, it is theoretically possible that some Müllerian mimics are parasitic if a weakly defended mimic benefits at the expense of a more highly defended model, a phenomenon known as ‘quasi-Batesian mimicry’. The theory expounded by Müller and extended here for unequal unpalatability, on the other hand, suggests that quasi-Batesian mimicry should be rare in comparison with classical, or mutualistic Müllerian mimicry. Evolutionarily, quasi-Batesian mimicry has consequences similar to classical Batesian mimicry, including unilateral ‘advergence’ of the mimic to the model, and diversifying frequency-dependent selection on the mimic which may lead to mimetic polymorphism. In this paper, theory and empirical evidence for mutual benefit and coevolution in Müllerian mimicry are reviewed. I use examples from well-known insect Müllerian mimicry complexes: the Limenitis–Danaus (Nymphalidae) system in North America, the Bombus–Psithyrus (Apidae) system in the north temperate zone, and the Heliconius–Laparus (Nymphalidae) system in tropical America. These give abundant evidence for unilateral advergence, and no convincing evidence, to my knowledge, for coevolved mutual convergence. Furthermore, mimetic polymorphisms are not uncommon. Yet classical mutualistic Müllerian mimicry, coupled with spatial (and possibly temporal) variation in model abundances convincingly explain these apparent anomalies without recourse to a quasi-Batesian explanation. Nevertheless, the case against classical Müllerian mimicry is not totally disproved, and should be investigated further. I hope that this tentative analysis of actual mimicry rings may encourage others to look for evidence of coevolution and quasi-Batesian effects in a variety of other Müllerian mimicry systems. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Mimetic gain in batesian and Müllerian mimicry

Summary Starting from field investigations and experiments on mimetic butterfly populations a model for two mimetic species is developed. The model comprises various features such as the growth rates and carrying capacities of the two species, their unpalatability to predators, the recruitment and the training of the predators and, most important, the similarity of the two mimetic species. The model ranges from pure Batesian to pure Müllerian mimicry over a spectrum of possible cases. The mimetic gain is introduced as the relative increase in equilibrium density in a mimetic situation as compared to a situation where mimicry is not present. The dependence of this quantity on parameters as growth rate, carrying capacity, unpalatability, and similarity is investigated using numerical methods.     

Gene expression change in the Müllerian duct of the mouse fetus exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero

In utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES) induces various abnormalities in the Müllerian duct of the mouse. In order to understand the underlying molecular mechanisms associated with DES-induced abnormalities of the Müllerian duct, gene expression was examined on Gestation Day (GD) 19 in mouse fetuses exposed to DES (67 microg/kg body weight) from GDs 10 to 18. Microarray analysis revealed that 387, 387, and 225 genes were upregulated and 177, 172, and 75 genes were downregulated by DES in the oviduct, uterus, and vagina, respectively. DES exposure in utero commonly upregulated 72 genes and downregulated 15 genes in these three organs. The present study demonstrated that organ-specific gene expression patterns in the mouse Müllerian duct were altered by in utero DES exposure. DES-induced changes in expression of genes such as Dkk2, Nkd2, and sFRP1 as well as changes in genes of the Hox, Wnt, and Eph families in the female mouse fetal reproductive tract could be the basis for various abnormalities in reproductive tracts following exposure to this estrogenic drug.     

Studies on sex-organ development. Ontogeny of cytoplasmic oestrogen receptor in chick Müllerian duct.

Oestradiol receptors were observed in the cytoplasm of the chick Müllerian duct at several embryonic stages. The sedimentation coefficients and the dissociation constants of the receptor protein remained unchanged throughout the various stages of development. Specific binding of cytoplasmic receptor to [3H]oestradiol assayed in vitro was shown to be saturable at concentration of 10nM or higher. The number of oeastradiol-binding sites on a per-cell basis increased linearly from day 8 to day 12 of incubation and then levelled off from day 12 to the fourth day after hatching. These results indicate that in the developing embryonic sex organ, the same receptor protein is present throughout prenatal development. The concentration of the oestradiol receptor increases and reaches a constant value, but the capacity for the receptor to interact with the hormone does not change.     

Müllerian inhibiting substance in reproduction and cancer.

During embryogenesis normal male phenotypic development requires the action of Müllerian Inhibiting Substance (MIS) which is secreted by Sertoli cells of the fetal testis. As testes differentiate in genetic (XY) males, they produce MIS which causes regression of the Müllerian ducts, the anlagen of the female reproductive tract. Soon thereafter, testicular androgens stimulate the Wolffian ducts. In females, on the other hand, MIS is not produced by grandulosa cells until after birth, before which, estrogens induce Müllerian duct development, while the Wolffian ducts passively atrophy in the absence of androgenic stimulation. High serum MIS levels in males are maintained until puberty, whereupon they fall to baseline levels. In females MIS is undetectable in serum until the peripubertal period when values approach the baseline levels of males. This distinct pattern of sexual and ontogenic expression presupposes and requires tight regulation. MIS may play a role in gonadal function and development. Our laboratory has shown that an important role for ovarian MIS is to inhibit oocyte meiosis, perhaps providing maximal oocyte maturation prior to selection for ovulation and subsequent fertilization. Furthermore, Vigier et al. (Development 100:43-55) have recently obtained evidence that MIS may influence testicular differentiation, coincident with inhibition of aromatase activity. Current structure-function studies demonstrate that MIS, like other growth regulators in its protein family, requires proteolytic cleavage to exhibit full biological activity. MIS can be inhibited by epidermal growth factor. This antagonism, which is common to all MIS functions so far investigated, is associated with inhibition of EGF receptor autophosphorylation. We have provided evidence that bovine MIS can inhibit female reproductive tract tumors arising in adults.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Sexually dimorphic expression of secreted frizzled-related (SFRP) genes in the developing mouse Müllerian duct

In developing male embryos, the female reproductive tract primordia (Müllerian ducts) regress due to the production of testicular anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). Because of the association between secreted frizzled-related proteins (SFRPs) and apoptosis, their reported developmental expression patterns and the role of WNT signaling in female reproductive tract development, we examined expression of Sfrp2 and Sfrp5 during development of the Müllerian duct in male (XY) and female (XX) mouse embryos. We show that expression of both Sfrp2 and Sfrp5 is dynamic and sexually dimorphic. In addition, the male-specific expression observed for both genes prior to the onset of regression is absent in mutant male embryos that fail to undergo Müllerian duct regression. We identified ENU-induced point mutations in Sfrp5 and Sfrp2 that are predicted to severely disrupt the function of these genes. Male embryos and adults homozygous for these mutations, both individually and in combination, are viable and apparently fertile with no overt abnormalities of reproductive tract development.     

Heterogeneity in predator micro-habitat use and the maintenance of Müllerian mimetic diversity

Müllerian mimicry, where groups of chemically defended species display a common warning color pattern and thereby share the cost of educating predators, is one of the most striking examples of ecological adaptation. Classic models of Müllerian mimicry predict that all unpalatable species of a similar size and form within a community should converge on a single mimetic pattern, but instead communities of unpalatable species often display a remarkable diversity of mimetic patterns (e.g. neotropical ithomiine butterflies). It has been suggested that this apparent paradox may be explained if different suites of predators and species belonging to different mimicry groups utilize different micro-habitats within the community. We developed a stochastic individual-based model for a community of unpalatable mimetic prey species and their predators to evaluate this hypothesis and to examine the effect of predator heterogeneity on prey micro-habitat use. We found that community-level mimetic diversity was higher in simulations with heterogeneous predator micro-habitat use than in simulations with homogeneous predator micro-habitat use. Regardless of the form of predation, mimicry pattern-based assortative mating caused community-level mimetic diversity to persist. Heterogeneity in predator micro-habitat use led to an increased association between mimicry pattern and prey micro-habitat use relative to homogeneous predator micro-habitat use. This increased association was driven, at least in part, by evolutionary convergence of prey micro-habitat use when predators displayed heterogeneous micro-habitat use. These findings provide a theoretical explanation for an important question in evolutionary biology: how is community-level Müllerian mimetic diversity maintained in the face of selection against rare phenotypes?