The receptor phosphatase HmLAR2 collaborates with focal adhesion proteins in filopodial tips to control growth cone morphology

Receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs) have been shown to play key roles in regulating axon guidance and synaptogenesis. HmLAR2, one of two closely related LAR-like RPTPs in the embryonic leech, is expressed in a few central neurons and in a unique segmentally-iterated peripheral cell, the comb cell (CC). Here we show that tagged HmLAR2-EGFP has a punctate pattern of expression in the growth cones of the CC, particularly at the tips of extending filopodia. Moreover, although expression of the wild-type EGFP-tagged receptor does not affect CC growth cone morphology, expression of a putative dominant-negative mutant of the receptor, CS-HmLAR2, leads to the enlargement of the growth cones, a shortening of filopodia, and errors in cellular tiling. RNAi of several candidate substrate signaling proteins, Lena (leech Ena/Vasp), β-integrin and paxillin, but not β-catenin, phenocopies particular aspects of the effects of HmLAR2 RNAi. For paxillin, which co-localizes with HmLAR2 at growth cone puncta, knock-down led to a reduction in the number of such puncta. Together, our data suggests that HmLAR2 regulates the morphology of the growth cone by controlling F-actin polymerization and focal adhesion complexes.     

The heparan sulfate proteoglycan syndecan is an in vivo ligand for the Drosophila LAR receptor tyrosine phosphatase

BACKGROUND: Receptor tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs) are essential for axon guidance and synaptogenesis in Drosophila. Each guidance decision made by embryonic motor axons during outgrowth to their muscle targets requires a specific subset of the five neural RPTPs. The logic underlying these requirements, however, is still unclear, partially because the ligands recognized by RPTPs at growth cone choice points have not been identified. RPTPs in general are still "orphan receptors" because, while they have been found to interact in vitro with many different proteins, their in vivo ligands are unknown. RESULTS: Here we use a new type of deficiency screen to identify the transmembrane heparan sulfate proteoglycan Syndecan (Sdc) as a ligand for the neuronal RPTP LAR. LAR interacts with the glycosaminoglycan chains of Syndecan in vitro with nanomolar affinity. Genetic interaction studies using Sdc and Lar LOF mutations demonstrate that Sdc contributes to LAR's function in motor axon guidance. We also show that overexpression of Sdc on muscles generates the same phenotype as overexpression of LAR in neurons and that genetic removal of LAR suppresses the phenotype produced by ectopic muscle Sdc. Finally, we show that there is at least one additional, nonproteoglycan, ligand for LAR encoded in the genome. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our results demonstrate that Sdc on muscles can interact with neuronal LAR in vivo and that binding to Sdc increases LAR's signaling efficacy. Thus, Sdc is a ligand that can act in trans to positively regulate signal transduction through LAR within neuronal growth cones.     

The C. elegans LAR-like receptor tyrosine phosphatase PTP-3 and the VAB-1 Eph receptor tyrosine kinase have partly redundant functions in morphogenesis

Receptor-like protein-tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs) form a diverse family of cell surface molecules whose functions remain poorly understood. The LAR subfamily of RPTPs has been implicated in axon guidance and neural development. Here we report the molecular and genetic analysis of the C. elegans LAR subfamily member PTP-3. PTP-3 isoforms are expressed in many tissues in early embryogenesis, and later become localized to neuronal processes and to epithelial adherens junctions. Loss of function in ptp-3 causes low-penetrance defects in gastrulation and epidermal development similar to those of VAB-1 Eph receptor tyrosine kinase mutants. Loss of function in ptp-3 synergistically enhances phenotypes of mutations in the C. elegans Eph receptor VAB-1 and a subset of its ephrin ligands, but does not show specific interactions with several other RTKs or morphogenetic mutants. The genetic interaction of vab-1 and ptp-3 suggests that LAR-like RPTPs and Eph receptors have related and partly redundant functions in C. elegans morphogenesis.     

The Cell Surface Receptor Tartan Is a Potential In Vivo Substrate for the Receptor Tyrosine Phosphatase Ptp52F

Receptor-linked protein-tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs) are essential regulators of axon guidance and synaptogenesis in Drosophila, but the signaling pathways in which they function are poorly defined. We identified the cell surface receptor Tartan (Trn) as a candidate substrate for the neuronal RPTP Ptp52F by using a modified two-hybrid screen with a substrate-trapping mutant of Ptp52F as “bait.” Trn can bind to the Ptp52F substrate-trapping mutant in transfected Drosophila S2 cells if v-Src kinase, which phosphorylates Trn, is also expressed. Coexpression of wild-type Ptp52F causes dephosphorylation of v-Src-phosphorylated Trn. To examine the specificity of the interaction in vitro, we incubated Ptp52F-glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins with pervanadate-treated S2 cell lysates. Wild-type Ptp52F dephosphorylated Trn, as well as most other bands in the lysate. GST “pulldown” experiments demonstrated that the Ptp52F substrate-trapping mutant binds exclusively to phospho-Trn. Wild-type Ptp52F pulled down dephosphorylated Trn, suggesting that it forms a stable Ptp52F-Trn complex that persists after substrate dephosphorylation. To evaluate whether Trn and Ptp52F are part of the same pathway in vivo, we examined motor axon guidance in mutant embryos. trn and Ptp52F mutations produce identical phenotypes affecting the SNa motor nerve. The genes also display dosage-dependent interactions, suggesting that Ptp52F regulates Trn signaling in SNa motor neurons.Receptor-linked protein-tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs) are enzymes with extracellular (XC) domains, a single transmembrane domain, and one or two cytoplasmic protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) homology domains. Many RPTPs have XC sequences that resemble those of cell adhesion molecules (for a review, see reference 33). This sequence organization suggests that RPTPs can couple cell-cell recognition events to dephosphorylation of cytoplasmic substrates. Interestingly, while phosphotyrosine (PY) pathways involved in cell growth and differentiation typically involve receptor tyrosine kinases that bind to growth factors and are regulated by nontransmembrane PTPs, those that control axon guidance often use RPTPs and nontransmembrane TKs. This implies that the cues that affect PY signaling in axonal growth cones may interact with RPTPs rather than with receptor tyrosine kinases (reviewed in reference 14).There are 17 active RPTPs encoded in the human genome, while Drosophila has six. Most of the mammalian RPTPs are expressed in nonneural tissues, but four of the six fly RPTPs are expressed only by central nervous system (CNS) neurons in late embryos. All published zygotic phenotypes produced by Rptp mutations are alterations in axon guidance or synaptogenesis. These results suggest that the major functions of the Drosophila RPTPs are in neural development (for a review, see reference 16). Analysis of axon guidance phenotypes in embryos bearing single or multiple Rptp mutations is consistent with the idea that RPTP interactions with ligands at growth cone choice points convey “information,” in the form of changes in substrate phosphorylation within growth cones, that is used to determine pathway decisions.In the Drosophila neuromuscular system, 36 motor axons grow out within six nerve bundles in each abdominal hemisegment, and each axonal growth cone makes a series of genetically determined guidance decisions that direct it to the appropriate muscle fiber (for a review, see reference 27). Our work on Rptp mutant combinations suggests that each pathway decision uses a specific subset of the six RPTPs. RPTPs can exhibit functional redundancy, so that the loss of one does not produce a defect unless another RPTP is also absent, or competition, in which loss of one RPTP suppresses the phenotype produced by loss of another (5, 6, 31). Examination of RPTP expression patterns suggests that the RPTPs are expressed by most (or possibly all) CNS neurons, including motor neurons. If so, the requirements for individual RPTPs for execution of particular guidance decisions cannot be due to selective expression of these RPTPs on specific motor axons. These requirements might instead be determined by the expression patterns of RPTP ligands, so that only RPTPs whose ligands were localized to the vicinity of a growth cone choice point would participate in that pathway decision. Alternatively (or in addition), the necessity of a particular RPTP for a pathway decision might arise from selective expression of RPTP substrates, so that an RPTP would be important for guidance decisions made by a growth cone of a specific motor neuron only if that neuron expressed the relevant substrate(s).Evaluation of such models requires identification of specific XC ligands and intracellular substrates for the Drosophila RPTPs. Only one set of ligands has been identified thus far. These are the heparan sulfate proteoglycans Syndecan (Sdc) and Dallylike (Dlp), which bind to the Lar RPTP with nanomolar affinity and contribute to its functions in axon guidance and synapse growth (9, 15). Similarly, little is known about substrate specificity in vivo. Lar can dephosphorylate the Enabled (Ena) protein, which regulates the growth cone cytoskeleton, and genetic interaction studies suggest that Ena may be an in vivo substrate for Lar (35). The transmembrane protein gp150 can be dephosphorylated by Ptp10D in cell culture and intact fly larvae, but genetics has not provided evidence that Ptp10D and gp150 are in the same signaling pathway in vivo (7).The identification of in vivo substrates for RPTPs has been hampered by the fact that purified RPTP cytoplasmic domains often do not exhibit high selectivity in vitro when tested for dephosphorylation activity on peptides or proteins. The most fruitful method for finding substrates for both RPTPs and cytoplasmic PTPs has been the use of “substrate-trapping” mutants. The most effective substrate traps were devised by Tonks and coworkers, and are created by changing an invariant Asp (D) residue within the PTP active site to Ala (A) (8). The D residue has an abnormal pK and is thus able to donate a proton to the phosphorus-oxygen bond, facilitating displacement of the tyrosine (Y) OH by the invariant Cys (C) nucleophile of the enzyme. This creates a phosphoenzyme intermediate. The dephosphorylated substrate then dissociates, and water attacks the Cys-phosphate bond, releasing the phosphate and reconstituting the enzyme. In D→A mutants, the polarization of the phosphorus-oxygen bond by protonation cannot take place, and the PY substrate remains bound to the enzyme. Substrate-trapping mutants expressed in cells often bind to only a few phosphoproteins, suggesting that PTPs exhibit high specificity in vivo (see, for example, reference 11).We conducted a modified yeast two-hybrid screen to find Drosophila phosphoproteins that bind selectively to RPTP substrate-trapping mutants. We identified the cell surface receptor Tartan (Trn) in this screen and showed that it is a substrate for the Ptp52F RPTP in Drosophila Schneider 2 (S2) cells. Axon guidance phenotypes in trn mutants are identical to those seen in Ptp52F mutants, and trn and Ptp52F exhibit dosage-dependent genetic interactions. These results suggest that Ptp52F is a regulator of Trn signaling in motor neurons in vivo.     

Redox regulation of dimerization of the receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatases RPTPalpha, LAR, RPTPmu and CD45

Whether dimerization is a general regulatory mechanism of receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs) is a subject of debate. Biochemical evidence demonstrates that RPTPalpha and cluster of differentiation (CD)45 dimerize. Their catalytic activity is regulated by dimerization and structural evidence from RPTPalpha supports dimerization-induced inhibition of catalytic activity. The crystal structures of CD45 and leukocyte common antigen related (LAR) indicate that dimerization would result in a steric clash. Here, we investigate dimerization of four RPTPs. We demonstrate that LAR and RPTPmu dimerized constitutively, which is likely to be due to their ectodomains. To investigate the role of the cytoplasmic domain in dimerization we generated RPTPalpha ectodomain (EDalpha)/RPTP chimeras and found that -- similarly to native RPTPalpha -- oxidation stabilized their dimerization. Limited tryptic proteolysis demonstrated that oxidation induced conformational changes in the cytoplasmic domains of these RPTPs, indicating that the cytoplasmic domains are not rigid structures, but rather that there is flexibility. Moreover, oxidation induced changes in the rotational coupling of dimers of full length EDalpha/RPTP chimeras in living cells, which were largely dependent on the catalytic cysteine in the membrane-distal protein-tyrosine phosphatase domain of RPTPalpha and LAR. Our results provide new evidence for redox regulation of dimerized RPTPs.     

Expression of receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase alpha, sigma and LAR during development of the zebrafish embryo.

Receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs) are key players in Drosophila development. To study the role of RPTPs in vertebrate development, we have cloned zebrafish (zf) RPTPs, including RPTP alpha (RPTPalpha), RPTP sigma (RPTPsigma) and LAR. These three RPTPs are broadly transcribed in early development. At 24h post fertilisation (hpf), all three genes are expressed in the nervous system in partially overlapping patterns. At 3 days post fertilisation zf-RPTPalpha and zf-LAR show similar expression patterns in the central nervous system (CNS), the pharyngeal arches, the pectoral fins and the spinal cord. Interestingly, zf-LAR is uniquely expressed in the neuromast cells, whereas zf-RPTPsigma expression is confined to the central nervous system.     

Intra- and intermolecular interactions between intracellular domains of receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatases

The presence of two protein-tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) domains is a striking feature in most transmembrane receptor PTPs (RPTPs). The generally inactive membrane-distal PTP domains (RPTP-D2s) bind and are proposed to regulate the membrane-proximal PTP domains (RPTP-D1s). We set out to characterize the interactions between RPTP-D1s and RPTP-D2s in vivo by co-immunoprecipitation of hemagglutinin-tagged fusion proteins encoding the transmembrane domain and RPTP-D1 and myc-tagged RPTP-D2. Seven RPTPs from four different subfamilies were used: RPTPalpha, RPTPepsilon, LAR, RPTPvarsigma, RPTPdelta, CD45, and RPTP(mu). We found that RPTP-D2s bound to RPTPs with different affinities. The presence of intrinsic RPTP-D2 altered the binding specificity toward other RPTP-D2s positively or negatively, depending on the identity of the RPTPs. Furthermore, the C terminus of RPTP-D2s and the "wedge" in RPTP-D1s played a central role in binding specificity. Finally, full-length RPTPalpha and LAR heterodimerized in an oxidative stress-dependent manner. Like RPTPalpha-D2, the LAR-D2 conformation was affected by oxidative stress, suggesting a common regulatory mechanism for RPTP complex formation. Taken together, interactions between RPTP-D1s and RPTP-D2s are a common but specific mechanism that is likely to be regulated. The RPTP-D2s and the wedge structures are crucial determinants of binding specificity, thus regulating cross-talk between RPTPs.     

Substrate Specificity of R3 Receptor-like Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase Subfamily toward Receptor Protein-tyrosine Kinases

Receptor-like protein-tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs) are involved in various aspects of cellular functions, such as proliferation, differentiation, survival, migration, and metabolism. A small number of RPTPs have been reported to regulate activities of some cellular proteins including receptor protein-tyrosine kinases (RPTKs). However, our understanding about the roles of individual RPTPs in the regulation of RPTKs is still limited. The R3 RPTP subfamily reportedly plays pivotal roles in the development of several tissues including the vascular and nervous systems. Here, we examined enzyme-substrate relationships between the four R3 RPTP subfamily members and 21 RPTK members selected from 14 RPTK subfamilies by using a mammalian two-hybrid system with substrate-trapping RPTP mutants. Among the 84 RPTP-RPTK combinations conceivable, we detected 30 positive interactions: 25 of the enzyme-substrate relationships were novel. We randomly chose several RPTKs assumed to be substrates for R3 RPTPs, and validated the results of this screen by in vitro dephosphorylation assays, and by cell-based assays involving overexpression and knock-down experiments. Because their functional relationships were verified without exception, it is probable that the RPTKs identified as potential substrates are actually physiological substrates for the R3 RPTPs. Interestingly, some RPTKs were recognized as substrates by all R3 members, but others were recognized by only one or a few members. The enzyme-substrate relationships identified in the present study will shed light on physiological roles of the R3 RPTP subfamily.     

Dimerization of tyrosine phosphatase PTPRO decreases its activity and ability to inactivate TrkC

Receptor-protein tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs), like receptor tyrosine kinases, regulate neuronal differentiation. While receptor tyrosine kinases are dimerized and activated by extracellular ligands, the extent to which RPTPs dimerize, and the effects of dimerization on phosphatase activity, are poorly understood. We have examined a neuronal type III RPTP, PTPRO; we find that PTPRO can form dimers in living cells, and that disulfide linkages in PTPROs intracellular domain likely regulate dimerization. Dimerization of PTPROs transmembrane and intracellular domains, achieved by ligand binding to a chimeric fusion protein, decreases activity toward artificial peptides and toward a putative substrate, tropomyosin-related kinase C (TrkC). Dephosphorylation of TrkC by PTPRO may be physiologically relevant, as it is efficient, and TrkC and PTPRO can be co-precipitated from transfected cells. Inhibition of PTPROs phosphatase activity by dimerization is interesting, as dimerization of a related RPTP, CD148/PTPRJ, increases activity. Thus, our results suggest a complex relationship between dimerization and activity in type III RPTPs.     

Expression of receptor tyrosine phosphatases during development of the retinotectal projection of the chick

Receptor tyrosine kinases and receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs) appear to coordinate many aspects of neural development, including axon growth and guidance. Here, we focus on the possible roles of RPTPs in the developing avian retinotectal system. Using both in situ hybridization analysis and immunohistochemistry, we show for the first time that five RPTP genes--CRYPalpha, CRYP-2, PTPmu, PTPgamma, and PTPalpha--have different but overlapping expression patterns throughout the retina and the tectum. PTPalpha is restricted to Muller glia cells and radial glia of the tectum, indicating a possible function in controlling neuronal migration. PTPgamma expression is restricted to amacrine neurons. CRYPalpha and CRYP-2 mRNAs in contrast are expressed throughout the retinal ganglion cell layer from where axons grow out to their tectal targets. PTPmu is expressed in a subset of these ganglion cells. CRYPalpha, CRYP-2, and PTPmu proteins are also localized in growth cones of retinal ganglion cell axons and are present in defined laminae of the tectum. Thus, the spatial and temporal expression of three distinct RPTP subtypes--CRYPalpha, CRYP-2, and PTPmu--are consistent with the possibility of their involvement in axon growth and guidance of the retinotectal projection.     

Receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases regulate retinal ganglion cell axon outgrowth in the developing Xenopus visual system

Receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs) are regulators of axon outgrowth and guidance in a variety of different vertebrate and invertebrate systems. Three RPTPs, CRYP-alpha, PTP-delta, and LAR, are expressed in overlapping but distinct patterns in the developing Xenopus retina, including expression in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) as they send axons to the tectum (Johnson KG, Holt CE. 2000. Expression of CRYP-alpha, LAR, PTP-delta, and PTP-rho in the developing Xenopus visual system. Mech Dev 92:291-294). In order to examine the role of these RPTPs in visual system development, putative dominant negative RPTP mutants (CS-CRYP-alpha, CS-PTP-delta, and CS-LAR) were expressed either singly or in combination in retinal cells. No effect was found on either retinal cell fate determination or on gross RGC axon guidance to the tectum. However, expression of these CS-RPTP constructs differentially affected the rate of RGC axon outgrowth. In vivo, expression of all three CS-RPTPs or CS-PTP-delta alone inhibited RGC axon outgrowth, while CS-LAR and CS-CRYP-alpha had no significant effect. In vitro, expression of CS-CRYP-alpha enhanced neurite outgrowth, while CS-PTP-delta inhibited neurite outgrowth in a substrate-dependent manner. This study provides the first in vivo evidence that RPTPs regulate retinal axon outgrowth.     

RNAi of the receptor tyrosine phosphatase HmLAR2 in a single cell of an intact leech embryo leads to growth-cone collapse

Receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs) are important for growth-cone migration [1-5], but their specific roles have yet to be defined. Previously, we showed that the growth cones of the Comb cell, an embryonic cell in the leech, express high levels of an RPTP called HmLAR2 [6,7]. Here, we report the use of RNA interference (RNAi) to block expression of HmLAR2 in individual Comb cells in the developing embryo. HmLAR2 mRNA levels were reduced in the soma, processes and growth cones of Comb cells injected with double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) for HmLAR2, but no decrease was detected when control dsRNAs were injected. Consistent with this observation, the level of phosphotyrosine increased significantly in the growth cones of Comb cells injected with HmLAR2 dsRNA. Within 24 hours, the growth cones of treated cells showed a distinct collapsed phenotype, with sharp reductions in lamellipodial surface area and in numbers of filopodia. These experiments indicate a key role for LAR-like RPTPs in maintaining the integrity of the growth cone.     

Functional significance of the LAR receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase family in development and diseases.

The protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) have emerged as critical players in diverse cellular functions. The focus of this review is the leukocyte common antigen-related (LAR) subfamily of receptor PTPs (RPTPs). This subfamily is composed of three vertebrate homologs, LAR, RPTP-sigma, and RPTP-delta, as well as few invertebrates orthologs such as Dlar. LAR-RPTPs have a predominant function in nervous system development that is conserved throughout evolution. Proteolytic cleavage of LAR-RPTP proproteins results in the noncovalent association of an extracellular domain resembling cell adhesion molecules and intracellular tandem PTPs domains, which is likely regulated via dimerization. Their receptor-like structures allow them to sense the extracellular environment and transduce signals intracellularly via their cytosolic PTP domains. Although many interacting partners of the LAR-RPTPs have been identified and suggest a role for the LAR-RPTPs in actin remodeling, very little is known about the mechanisms of action of RPTPs. LAR-RPTPs recently raised a lot of interest when they were shown to regulate neurite growth and nerve regeneration in transgenic animal models. In addition, LAR-RPTPs have also been implicated in metabolic regulation and cancer. This RPTP subfamily is likely to become important as drug targets in these various human pathologies, but further understanding of their complex signal transduction cascades will be required.     

Orchestrating the synaptic network by tyrosine phosphorylation signalling

The establishment of a functional brain requires coordinated and stereotyped formation of synapses between neurons. For this, trans-synaptic molecular cues (synaptic organizers) are exchanged between a neuron and its target to organize appropriate synapses. The understanding of signalling mechanisms by which such synaptic organizers lead to synapse formation is just being elucidated. However, recent studies revealed that some of these cues act through receptor protein tyrosine kinases (RPTKs) or phosphatases (RPTPs). Synaptogenic RPTKs and RPTPs pattern synaptic network through affecting local protein-protein binding dynamics, changing the phosphorylation state of signalling cascades, or promoting gene expression. Each RPTK or RPTP has distinct roles in synapse formation, serving at different synapses or showing differential synaptogenic effects. Thus, tyrosine phosphorylation signalling plays critical roles in building the orchestrated synaptic circuitry in the brain.     

Receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase signalling in development

Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Phosphatases (RPTPs) belong to the superfamily of protein-tyrosine phosphatases and have the intrinsic ability to transduce signals across the cell membrane. We are beginning to understand the role of RPTPs in development of invertebrates, due to elegant genetic studies. In contrast, relatively little is known about the role of RPTPs in vertebrate development. Signalling by RPTPs has predominantly been studied in mammalian cell systems, which has led to important insights into potential ligands, into regulation of RPTP activity and into potential RPTP substrates. Here, we will introduce the RPTPs, and discuss the function of the LAR-subfamily of RPTPs. In addition, we focus on the function and signalling of the haematopoietic RPTP, CD45. Finally, we will discuss the structure and function of RPTPalpha, the RPTP that is the subject of our studies.     

Expression,localization, and biological function of the R3 subtype of receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatases in mammals

The R3 subtype of receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs) includes VE-PTP, DEP-1, PTPRO, and SAP-1. All of these enzymes share a similar structure, with a single catalytic domain and putative tyrosine phosphorylation sites in the cytoplasmic region and fibronectin type III–like domains in the extracellular region. The expression of each R3 RPTP is largely restricted to a single or limited number of cell types, with VE-PTP and DEP-1 being expressed in endothelial or hematopoietic cells, PTPRO in neurons and in podocytes of the renal glomerulus, and SAP-1 in gastrointestinal epithelial cells. In addition, these RPTPs are localized specifically at the apical surface of polarized cells. The structure, expression, and localization of the R3 RPTPs suggest that they perform tissue-specific functions and that they might act through a common mechanism that includes activation of Src family kinases. In this review, we describe recent insights into R3-subtype RPTPs, particularly those of mammals.     

Multiple interactions between receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase (RPTP) alpha and membrane-distal protein-tyrosine phosphatase domains of various RPTPs

Receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase (RPTP) alpha belongs to the large family of receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatases containing two tandem phosphatase domains. Most of the catalytic activity is retained in the first, membrane-proximal domain (RPTPalpha-D1), and little is known about the function of the second, membrane-distal domain (RPTPalpha-D2). We investigated whether proteins bound to RPTPalpha using the two-hybrid system and found that the second domain of RPTPsigma interacted with the juxtamembrane domain of RPTPalpha. We confirmed this interaction by co-immunoprecipitation experiments. Furthermore, RPTPalpha not only interacted with RPTPsigma-D2 but also with RPTPalpha-D2, LAR-D2, RPTPdelta-D2, and RPTPmu-D2, members of various RPTP subfamilies, although with different affinities. In the yeast two-hybrid system and in glutathione S-transferase pull-down assays, we show that the RPTP-D2s interacted directly with the wedge structure of RPTPalpha-D1 that has been demonstrated to be involved in inactivation of the RPTPalpha-D1/RPTPalpha-D1 homodimer. The interaction was specific because the equivalent wedge structure in LAR was unable to interact with RPTPalpha-D2 or LAR-D2. In vivo, we show that other interaction sites exist as well, including the C terminus of RPTPalpha-D2. The observation that RPTPalpha, but not LAR, bound to multiple RPTP-D2s with varying affinities suggests a specific mechanism of cross-talk between RPTPs that may regulate their biological function.     

Ligands and signaling through receptor-type tyrosine phosphatases

Virtually every aspect of cellular proliferation and differentiation is regulated by changes in tyrosine phosphorylation. Tyrosine phosphorylation, in turn, is controlled by the opposing activities of protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) and protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs). PTKs are often transmembrane proteins (receptor PTKs) whose enzymatic activities and signaling functions are tightly regulated by the binding of specific ligands. A variety of transmembrane PTPs has also been identified; these proteins are called receptor PTPs (RPTPs), but in most cases their roles as receptors are very poorly understood. This review discusses the evidence that RPTPs are actually receptors for extrinsic ligands, and the extent to which interactions with putative ligands are known or suspected to cause changes in enzymatic activity. Finally, some of the RPTP substrates believed to be physiologically important are described. The evidence gathered to date suggests that models derived from studies of receptor PTKs may be too simple to account for the diversity and complexity of mechanisms through which ligand binding controls RPTP function.     

Should I stay or should I go?: Shedding of RPTPs in cancer cells switches signals from stabilizing cell-cell adhesion to driving cell migration

Dissolution of cell-cell adhesive contacts and increased cell-extracellular matrix adhesion are hallmarks of the migratory and invasive phenotype of cancer cells. These changes are facilitated by growth factor binding to receptor protein tyrosine kinases (RTKs). In normal cells, cell-cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), including some receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs), antagonize RTK signaling by promoting adhesion over migration. In cancer, RTK signaling is constitutive due to mutated or amplified RTKs, which leads to growth factor independence or autonomy. An alternative route for a tumor cell to achieve autonomy is to inactivate cell-cell CAMs such as RPTPs. RPTPs directly mediate cell adhesion and regulate both cadherin-dependent adhesion and signaling. In addition, RPTPs antagonize RTK signaling by dephosphorylating molecules activated following ligand binding. Both RPTPs and cadherins are downregulated in tumor cells by cleavage at the cell surface. This results in shedding of the extracellular, adhesive segment and displacement of the intracellular segment, altering its subcellular localization and access to substrates or binding partners. In this commentary we discuss the signals that are altered following RPTP and cadherin cleavage to promote cell migration. Tumor cells both step on the gas (RTKs) and disconnect the brakes (RPTPs and cadherins) during their invasive and metastatic journey.Key words: receptor protein tyrosine kinase, receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatase, cadherins, cell adhesion, signal transduction, phospholipase C gamma, protein kinase C, catenins, IQGAP1 protein, regulated intramembrane proteolysis