Speculative approaches in hypertension: concepts and drugs of the future

Despite the availability and application of more effective antihypertensive drugs over the past 3 decades, hypertension continues to be a major risk factor for the development of premature cardiovascular disease. Moreover, failure to elucidate the pathogenesis of essential hypertension, noncompliance, and difficulties in defining the appropriate level of blood pressure elevation requiring therapy, continue to mitigate against the adequate control of hypertension. Some of these problems may be overcome by the availability of depot forms of antihypertensive medication or implantable drug delivery systems, or by the use of several recently developed antihypertensive drugs. These include dopaminergic agonists, selective alpha-adrenergic agents, calcium antagonists, medullary neutral lipids, gamma-aminobutyric acid agonists, and inhibitors of renin or phenethylamine N-methyl-transferase. In addition, the potential involvement of morphinomimetic peptides, prostaglandins, tonin, and bradykinin in blood pressure control or certain hypertensive states suggests that drugs developed to block or potentiate the actions of these substances may have important therapeutic applications.     

The Cost-Effectiveness of Low-Cost Essential Antihypertensive Medicines for Hypertension Control in China: A Modelling Study

Background

Hypertension is China’s leading cardiovascular disease risk factor. Improved hypertension control in China would result in result in enormous health gains in the world’s largest population. A computer simulation model projected the cost-effectiveness of hypertension treatment in Chinese adults, assuming a range of essential medicines list drug costs.

Methods and Findings

The Cardiovascular Disease Policy Model-China, a Markov-style computer simulation model, simulated hypertension screening, essential medicines program implementation, hypertension control program administration, drug treatment and monitoring costs, disease-related costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained by preventing cardiovascular disease or lost because of drug side effects in untreated hypertensive adults aged 35–84 y over 2015–2025. Cost-effectiveness was assessed in cardiovascular disease patients (secondary prevention) and for two blood pressure ranges in primary prevention (stage one, 140–159/90–99 mm Hg; stage two, ≥160/≥100 mm Hg). Treatment of isolated systolic hypertension and combined systolic and diastolic hypertension were modeled as a reduction in systolic blood pressure; treatment of isolated diastolic hypertension was modeled as a reduction in diastolic blood pressure. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses explored ranges of antihypertensive drug effectiveness and costs, monitoring frequency, medication adherence, side effect severity, background hypertension prevalence, antihypertensive medication treatment, case fatality, incidence and prevalence, and cardiovascular disease treatment costs. Median antihypertensive costs from Shanghai and Yunnan province were entered into the model in order to estimate the effects of very low and high drug prices. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios less than the per capita gross domestic product of China (11,900 international dollars [Int$] in 2015) were considered cost-effective. Treating hypertensive adults with prior cardiovascular disease for secondary prevention was projected to be cost saving in the main simulation and 100% of probabilistic simulation results. Treating all hypertension for primary and secondary prevention would prevent about 800,000 cardiovascular disease events annually (95% uncertainty interval, 0.6 to 1.0 million) and was borderline cost-effective incremental to treating only cardiovascular disease and stage two patients (2015 Int$13,000 per QALY gained [95% uncertainty interval, Int$10,000 to Int$18,000]). Of all one-way sensitivity analyses, assuming adherence to taking medications as low as 25%, high Shanghai drug costs, or low medication efficacy led to the most unfavorable results (treating all hypertension, about Int$47,000, Int$37,000, and Int$27,000 per QALY were gained, respectively). The strengths of this study were the use of a recent Chinese national health survey, vital statistics, health care costs, and cohort study outcomes data as model inputs and reliance on clinical-trial-based estimates of coronary heart disease and stroke risk reduction due to antihypertensive medication treatment. The limitations of the study were the use of several sources of data, limited clinical trial evidence for medication effectiveness and harms in the youngest and oldest age groups, lack of information about geographic and ethnic subgroups, lack of specific information about indirect costs borne by patients, and uncertainty about the future epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases in China.

Conclusions

Expanded hypertension treatment has the potential to prevent about 800,000 cardiovascular disease events annually and be borderline cost-effective in China, provided low-cost essential antihypertensive medicines programs can be implemented.     

Management of elderly patients with sustained hypertension.

OBJECTIVE--To assess the clinical benefits of treating hypertension in elderly patients and to derive practical guidelines regarding indications, goals, and forms of treatment. DESIGN--Review of six published randomised trials. RESULTS--Active treatment of hypertension in elderly patients was associated with significant improvements in several indices of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, particularly the incidence of fatal and non-fatal strokes. On the basis of the trial data, combined systolic and diastolic hypertension was defined as a sustained systolic pressure greater than 160 mmHg and diastolic pressure greater than 90 mmHg. There is convincing evidence that efforts should be made to reduce both systolic and diastolic pressures to below these levels in patients up to the age of 80 years. Isolated systolic hypertension was defined as a systolic pressure greater than 160 mmHg in the presence of a diastolic pressure less than 90 mmHg. Two trials reported benefit from the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in patients up to the age of 80, and further trials are underway to support or refute this recommendation. Diuretics have an established role in the management of hypertension in elderly patients; beta adrenoceptor antagonists have given variable results, and the benefits are less impressive than with diuretic based regimens. Newer agents show promise in the treatment of elderly patients, particularly in the presence of coexisting disease, but their effects on morbidity and mortality have not been evaluated in large randomised trials. CONCLUSIONS--Diuretics rather than beta blockers are the treatment of choice for patients with uncomplicated hypertension, but combinations of drugs may be required in as many as 50% of patients.     

Regulation of therapeutic apoptosis: a potential target in controlling hypertensive organ damage

Cell growth and survival are potential therapeutic targets for the control of complications associated with hypertension. In most cardiovascular disorders, cardiac fibroblasts and large-vessel smooth muscle cells can replicate and thus contribute to the disease. We propose that cardiovascular hyperplasia may be reversed via therapeutic apoptosis induction with drugs that are safe and already used in the clinic. We first reported that, irrespective of the drug class, those drugs that are able to induce regression of cardiovascular hypertrophy are also able to reverse cardiovascular hyperplasia via apoptosis. Drugs active in this regard include inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system, calcium channel blockers, and beta-blockers. Moreover, the effects of these drugs on cell survival is not merely secondary to blood pressure reduction. Therapeutic apoptosis in the cardiovascular system of the spontaneously hypertensive rat is characterized by a rapid and transient onset following initiation of antihypertensive treatment. Herein, the induction and termination of therapeutic apoptosis during drug treatment of hypertension will be briefly reviewed and supported by novel data suggesting that reversal of cardiovascular hyperplasia is associated with reduced cell growth and a resistance to further induction of therapeutic apoptosis, as shown in spontaneously hypertensive rats receiving an intermittent regime of nifedipine therapy. We propose that the presence of a cell subpopulation with defective cell cycle regulation may determine organ susceptibility to undergo therapeutic apoptosis.     

Application of plasma lipidomics in studying the response of patients with essential hypertension to antihypertensive drug therapy

Hypertension is a key risk factor in the progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Dyslipidemia, a strong predictor of CVD, frequently coexists with hypertension. Therefore, the control of hypertension and dyslipidemia may help reduce CVD morbidity and mortality. In the present study, the therapeutic effects of antihypertensive agents on blood pressure control and plasma lipid metabolism were evaluated. The plasma lipid profiles of patients with treated (n = 25) or untreated (n = 30) essential hypertension as well as of subjects with normotension (n = 28) were analyzed using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Principal component analysis of the lipidomics data revealed distinct clusters among studied subjects across three human populations. Phosphatidylcholines and triacylglycerols (TG) dominated the pattern of hypertension-influenced plasma lipid metabolism. Discriminatory lipid metabolites were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by a post hoc multiple comparison correction. TG lipid class was significantly increased by 49.0% (p < 0.001) in hypertensive vs. normotensive groups while tended to decrease (-21.2%, p = 0.054) in hypertensive patients after treatment. Total cholesteryl esters were significantly decreased by -16.9% (p < 0.001) in hypertensive patients after treatment. In particular, a large number of individual neutral lipid species were significantly elevated in hypertensive subjects but significantly decreased after treatment with antihypertensive agents. The present study applied, for the first time, a systems biology based lipidomics approach to investigate differentiation among plasma lipid metabolism of patients with treated/untreated essential hypertension and subjects with normotension. Our results demonstrate that antihypertensive medications to lower blood pressure of hypertensive patients to target levels produced moderate plasma lipid metabolism improvement of patients with hypertension.     

Founder mutations characterise the mutation panorama in 200 Swedish index cases referred for Long QT syndrome genetic testing

Background

Hypertension is one of the leading causes of cardiovascular disease (CVD). A range of antihypertensive drugs exists, and their prices vary widely mainly due to patent rights. The objective of this study was to explore the cost-effectiveness of different generic antihypertensive drugs as first, second and third choice for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Methods

We used the Norwegian Cardiovascular Disease model (NorCaD) to simulate the cardiovascular life of patients from hypertension without symptoms until they were all dead or 100 years old. The risk of CVD events and costs were based on recent Norwegian sources.

Results

In single-drug treatment, all antihypertensives are cost-effective compared to no drug treatment. In the base-case analysis, the first, second and third choice of antihypertensive were calcium channel blocker, thiazide and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. However the sensitivity and scenario analyses indicated considerable uncertainty in that angiotensin receptor blockers as well as, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta blockers and thiazides could be the most cost-effective antihypertensive drugs.

Conclusions

Generic antihypertensives are cost-effective in a wide range of risk groups. There is considerable uncertainty, however, regarding which drug is the most cost-effective.     

Impact of treating hyperlipidemia or hypertension to reduce the risk of death from coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease among hypertensive and nonhypertensive adults and to estimate the effect of treating hyperlipidemia or hypertension to reduce the risk of death from coronary artery disease. METHODS: The authors evaluated a sample of 7814 subjects aged 35-74 years free of clinical cardiovascular disease from the Canadian Heart Health Surveys to estimate the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. They identified hyperlipidemic subjects (ratio of total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [total-C/HDL-C] 6.0 [corrected] or more for men and 5.0 [corrected] or more for women) and hypertensive subjects (systolic or diastolic blood pressure 160/90 mm Hg or greater, or receiving pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic treatment). A life expectancy model was used to estimate the rate of death from coronary artery disease following specific treatments. RESULTS: An elevated total-C/HDL-C ratio was significantly more common among hypertensive than nonhypertensive men aged 35-64 (rate ratio [RR] 1.56 for age 35-54, 1.28 for age 55-64) and among hypertensive than nonhypertensive women of all ages (RR 2.73 for age 35-54, 1.58 for age 55-64, 1.31 for age 65-74). Obesity and a sedentary lifestyle were also more common among hypertensive than among nonhypertensive subjects. According to the model, more deaths from coronary artery disease could be prevented among subjects with treated but uncontrolled hypertension by modifying lipids rather than by further reducing blood pressure for men aged 35-54 (reduction of 50 v. 29 deaths per 100,000) and 55-64 (reduction of 171 v. 104 deaths per 100,000) and for women aged 35-54 (reduction of 44 v. 39 deaths per 100,000). Starting antihypertensive therapy in subjects aged 35-74 with untreated hypertension would achieve a greater net reduction in deaths from coronary artery disease than would lipid lowering. Nonetheless, the benefits of lipid therapy were substantial: lipid intervention among hypertensive subjects aged 35-74 represented 36% of the total benefits of treating hyperlipidemia in the total hyperlipidemic population. INTERPRETATION: The clustering of hyperlipidemia and the potential benefits of treatment among hypertensive adults demonstrate the need for screening and treating other cardiovascular risk factors beyond simply controlling blood pressure.     

Atrial pacing for rhythm control of atrial fibrillation

After atrial fibrillation (AF) develops, the first step is to search for and treat underlying (heart) s. Thereafter, AF should be treated. This includes prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, especially vascular events, and reduction of symptoms.1 The latter may be obtained by two treatment strategies: rhythm-control and/or rate-control treatment. Recent randomised trials have shown that rate control is not inferior to rhythm control with regard to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.2 In these studies, predominantly elderly patients with underlying heart s (especially hypertension) were included. Patients with (severely) symptomatic AF and advanced heart failure were excluded. Since then, rate-control treatment has been adopted more frequently, even as first-choice therapy, especially in the elderly.     

Survival in treated hypertension: follow up study after two decades

Objective: To compare survival and cause specific mortality in hypertensive men with non-hypertensive men derived from the same random population, and to study mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular diseases in the hypertensive men in relation to effects on cardiovascular risk factors during 22-23 years of follow up. Design: Prospective, population based observational study. Subjects and methods: 686 hypertensive men aged 47-55 at screening compared with 6810 non-hypertensive men. The hypertensive men were having stepped care treatment with either β adrenergic blocking drugs, thiazide diuretics, or combination treatment. Mortality, morbidity, and adverse effects were registered at yearly examinations and from death certificates. Main outcome measures: All cause mortality and cause specific mortality. Results: Treated hypertensive men had significantly impaired probability of total survival as well as survival from coronary heart disease and stroke. All cause mortality as well as coronary heart disease and stroke mortality were very similar in hypertensive men and normotensive men during the first decade, but increased steadily thereafter despite continuous good blood pressure control. Smoking, signs of target organ damage, and high serum cholesterol levels, but not blood pressure at screening, were significantly related to the incidence of coronary heart disease during follow up. In time dependent Cox’s regression analysis, the incidence of coronary heart disease was significantly related only to serum cholesterol concentrations in the study. Cancer mortality was almost similar in treated hypertensive men (61/686, 8.9%) and non-hypertensive men (732/6810, 10.8%). Conclusion: Treated hypertensive men had impaired survival and increased mortality from cardiovascular disease compared with non-hypertensive men of similar age. These differences were observed during the second decade of follow up. During an observation period of 22-23 years—about 15 000 patient years—hypertensive men receiving diuretics and β blockers had no increased risk of cancer or non-cardiovascular disease.

Key messages

• Hypertension is a prevalent (10-20%) and important risk factor for cardiovascular disease.
• In controlled trials over 3-5 years drug treatment for hypertension prevents these complications, but little is known about long term prognosis
• During 20-22 years treated hypertensive men had a significantly increased mortality, especially from coronary heart disease, compared with non-hypertensive men from the same population
• The high incidence of myocardial infarction was related to organ damage, smoking, and cholesterol at the time of entry to the study, and to achieved serum cholesterol concentrations during follow up
• The poor prognosis for mortality from coronary heart disease is dependent upon strict monitoring of serum cholesterol concentrations

     

Circulatory therapeutics: use of antihypertensive agents and their effects on the vasculature

This review addresses the use of the different antihypertensive agents currently available and some in development, and their effects on the vasculature. The different classes of agents used in the treatment of hypertension, and the results of recent large clinical trials, dosing protocols and adverse effects are first briefly summarized. The consequences on blood vessels of the use of antihypertensive drugs and the differential effects on the biology of large and small arteries resulting in modulation of vascular remodelling and dysfunction in hypertensive patients are then described. Large elastic conduit arteries exhibit outward hypertrophic remodelling and increased stiffness, which contributes to raise systolic blood pressure and afterload on the heart. Small resistance arteries undergo eutrophic or hypertrophic inward remodelling, and impair tissue perfusion. By these mechanisms both large and small arteries may contribute to trigger cardiovascular events. Some antihypertensive agents correct these changes, which could contribute to improved outcome. The mechanisms that at the level of the vascular wall lead to remodelling and can be beneficially affected by antihypertensive agents will also be addressed. These include vasoconstriction, growth and inflammation. The molecular pathways contributing to growth and inflammation will be summarily described. Further identification of these signalling pathways should allow identification of novel targets leading to development of new and improved medications for the treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular disease.     

Is NO the king? Pathophysiological benefit with uncertain clinical impact

NO is the "hero" molecule of the last few decades. It is a ubiquitous and omnipotent radical with both hemodynamic and antiproliferative effects within the cardiovascular system. NO is an important counterregulatory factor for vasoconstrictors and growth promoting substances. Endothelial dysfunction with decreased NO production is related to many cardiovascular disorders, such as coronary artery disease, heart failure and hypertension. Despite the important role of NO within the circulation, there is only limited evidence in the form of large clinical trials that NO delivery can reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Thus, NO donors are not in the first line therapy in ischemic heart disease, heart failure or arterial hypertension and NO delivery is recommended only in particular clinical situations, when a well established treatment is contraindicated or has an insufficient effect. It is concluded that the insufficient NO production is the principal disorder in endothelial dysfunction, which is related to cardiovascular pathology with deteriorated prognosis, but the impact of therapeutically increased NO bioactivity on the morbidity and mortality is inferior to well established treatment with ACE-inhibitors, AT(1) receptor blockers, beta-blockers, statins and certain antihypertensive drugs. There is little doubt that NO is king in the circulation, but kings seldom decide the battles.     

ACE2: A novel therapeutic target for cardiovascular diseases

Hypertension afflicts over 65 million Americans and poses an increased risk for cardiovascular morbidity such as stroke, myocardial infarction and end-stage renal disease resulting in significant mortality. Overactivity of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been identified as an important determinant that is implicated in the etiology of these diseases and therefore represents a major target for therapy. In spite of the successes of drugs inhibiting various elements of the RAS, the incidence of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases remain steadily on the rise. This has lead many investigators to seek novel and innovative approaches, taking advantage of new pathways and technologies, for the control and possibly the cure of hypertension and related pathologies. The main objective of this review is to forward the concept that gene therapy and the genetic targeting of the RAS is the future avenue for the successful control and treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. We will present argument that genetic targeting of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a newly discovered member of the RAS, is ideally poised for this purpose. This will be accomplished by discussion of the following: (i) summary of our current understanding of the RAS with a focus on the systemic versus tissue counterparts as they relate to hypertension and other cardiovascular pathologies; (ii) the newly discovered ACE2 enzyme with its physiological and pathophysiological implications; (iii) summary of the current antihypertensive pharmacotherapy and its limitations; (iv) the discovery and design of ACE inhibitors; (v) the emerging concepts for ACE2 drug design; (vi) the current status of genetic targeting of the RAS; (vii) the potential of ACE2 as a therapeutic target for hypertension and cardiovascular disease treatment; and (viii) future perspectives for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases.     

SARS-CoV-2 associated COVID-19 in geriatric population: A brief narrative review

Coronavirus disease 2019 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), has emerged as a fatal pandemic and has crushed even the world’s best healthcare systems. Globally, it has affected 40,373,228 individuals and resulted in 1,119,568 deaths as of October 19, 2020. Research studies have demonstrated that geriatric population is vastly vulnerable to COVID-19 morbidity and mortality given their age and preexisting chronic comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic pulmonary and chronic kidney disease The data regarding susceptibility of elderly population to COVID-19 is accruing and suggests that factors like age, gender, chronic comorbidity, inflammaging, immunosenescence and renin angiotensin system may be the contributing risk factors towards COVID-19 and associated mortality in elderly population. Based on updated scientific literature, this narrative review précises the clinical presentations and underlying risk factors that might be associated with COVID-19 morbidity in geriatric population and provides informed insights, and discusses clinical presentation, psychosocial impact, mortality and potential corticosteroid treatment and prevention strategies of COVID-19 in older adults.     

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a novel risk factor for cardiovascular disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in Canada and elsewhere. It affects 5% of all adult Canadians and is the fourth leading cause of death. Interestingly, the leading causes of hospitalizations and mortality among COPD patients are cardiovascular events. In the Lung Health Study, over 5 800 patients with mild to moderate COPD were studied. Forty-two to 48% of all hospitalizations that occurred over the study's 5-year follow-up period were related to cardiovascular complications. Various population-based studies suggest that independent of smoking, age, and gender, COPD increases the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality twofold. Alarmingly, some bronchodilators, which are commonly used to treat symptoms in COPD, may increase the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and even mortality among COPD patients. In this paper, we discuss the epidemiologic evidence linking COPD and cardiovascular events as well as the potential mechanism(s) which may be responsible for this association.     

Choice of antihypertensive drug in the diabetic patient

The hypertensive patient with type 2 diabetes is especially at risk of adverse cardiovascular events. The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) and Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) studies suggested that treatment to a lower target blood pressure resulted in better prevention of clinical disease in these patients. Most trials comparing antihypertensive drugs have shown only minimal differences between the various agents. The evidence from the trials suggests that diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and the angiotensin-receptor antagonists (ARBs) will all successfully reduce adverse clinical events. The largest of the comparative hypertensive drug trials, the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT), demonstrated that a diuretic has a better hypotensive effect, and was more successful in preventing many aspects of cardiovascular disease compared with CCBs and ACE inhibitors. The importance of good blood pressure control and the general equivalence of antihypertensive drugs were again shown in the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial, which compared an ARB with a CCB. Choice of antihypertensive agent should be individualized and guided by the presence of concomitant clinical disease and the need to protect any specific target organ system in the diabetic hypertensive. Diuretics, being potent hypotensive drugs with clearly demonstrated clinical benefit, should form part of the antihypertensive regimen of most diabetic hypertensives. ACE inhibitors and ARBs are especially useful in preventing nephropathy. Most patients will require a combination of antihypertensive drugs to achieve tight blood pressure control of under 130/80 mm Hg in the diabetic hypertensive. The clinician should concentrate on seeking this lower target blood pressure rather than be excessively concerned about which is the best antihypertensive agent.     

Antioxidant therapy for management of oxidative stress induced hypertension

Hypertension is considered as the most common risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, also is regarded as a leading cause of the mortality and morbidity worldwide. The mechanisms underlying the pathological process of hypertension are not completely explained. However, there is growing evidence that increased oxidative stress plays an important role in the pathophysiology of hypertension. Several preclinical studies and clinical trials have indicated that antioxidant therapy is important for management of hypertension, using antioxidants compounds such as alpha tocopherol (Vit E) and ascorbic acid (Vit C), polyphenols with others and some antihypertensive drugs that are now in clinical use (e.g. ACEIs, ARBs, novel B-blockers, dihydropyridine CCBs) which have antioxidative pleiotropic effects. The purpose of this review is to highlight the importance of antioxidant therapy for management of oxidative stress induced hypertension. Furthermore, we review the current knowledge in the oxidative stress and its significance in hypertension.     

Use of Medications and Lifestyles of Hypertensive Patients with High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Rural China

BackgroundHypertension, with a global prevalence of 40%, is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). We conducted an exploratory study in Zhejiang China to understand the prevention of CVD among hypertensive patients with a 10 year CVD risk of 20% or higher. We assessed current practices in a rural ‘township hospital’ (a primary care facility), and compared them with international evidence-based practice.MethodsA questionnaire survey was conducted to examine the use of modern drugs (antihypertensive drugs, statins and aspirin) and traditional drugs, compliance to medications and lifestyle among 274 hypertensive patients aged 40-74, with a CVD risk of 20% or higher (using the Asian Equation).ResultsThe majority (72%) were diagnosed with hypertension at township hospitals. Only 15% of study participants used two anti-hypertensive drugs, 0.7% took statin and 2.9% aspirin. Only 2.9% combined two types of modern drugs, while 0.4% combined three types (antihypertensives, statins and aspirin). Herbal compounds, sometimes with internationally rarely recommended drugs such as Reserpine were taken by 44%. Analysis of drug adherence showed that 9.8% had discontinued their drug therapy by themselves. 16% had missed doses and these were on less anti-hypertensive drugs than those who did not (t=-5.217, P=0.003). Of all participants, 28% currently smoked, 39% drank regularly and only 21% exercised frequently. The average salt intake per day was 7.1 (±3.8) g, while the national recommended level is 6g.ConclusionThe study revealed outdated and inadequate treatment and health education for hypertensive patients, especially for those who have high risk scores for CVD. There is a need to review the community-based guidelines for hypertension management. Health providers and patients should make a transition from solely treating hypertension, towards prevention of CVD. Health system issues need addressing including improving rural health insurance cover and primary care doctors’ capacity to manage chronic disease patients.     

Diabetes and hypertension

Diabetes mellitus and hypertension constitute two powerful independent risk factors for cardiovascular, renal and atherosclerotic disease. The frequent occurrence of the two diseases in the same individual doubles the risk of cardiovascular death, as well as substantially increasing the frequency of transient ischemic attacks, strokes, peripheral vascular disease with lower extremity amputations, as well as end-stage renal disease and blindness. Although hypertension usually occurs in IDDM in association with renal disease, in NIDDM the evolution of hypertension appears to be multifactorial and independent of renal disease. Obesity appears to be dissociable from hypertension and NIDDM with a common link between obesity, hypertension and NIDDM appearing to be hyperinsulinism and insulin resistance. It has been suggested that hyperinsulinism and insulin resistance may lead to hypertension through altered intracellular calcium metabolism, enhanced renal sodium reabsorption, or through an effect of insulin upon lipid and/or catecholamine metabolism. Further, insulin itself may have a direct effect upon the atherosclerotic process in the hypertensive diabetic patient. These considerations have been taken into account in the structuring of antihypertensive therapy in Type I and Type II Diabetes Mellitus.     

Changes in renal autacoids and hemodynamics associated with aging and isolated systolic hypertension

The aging kidney is characterized by a decrease in renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate mainly due to glomerulosclerosis. Nevertheless, even in the presence of these changes, the kidney maintains its functionality until advanced age. However, there is a tendency towards greater renal vasoconstriction in the elderly as compared with young individuals. This occurs either in physiological circumstances such as physical exercise, or in disease manifestations, such as the effective circulatory volume depletion that develops, for example, in heart failure. This tendency may be secondary to the reduction of renal autacoid modulatory capacity, particularly at the vasodilating prostaglandin level. In an acute experimental model we could demonstrate that, in the healthy elderly, the renal response to adrenergic activation by mental stress is characterized by a prolonged and pronounced vasoconstriction. In addition to this, in elderly patients affected by isolated systolic hypertension, we demonstrated an impairment of renal hemodynamic and humoral adaptation capacity in response to adrenergic activation and blood pressure increase. In the presence of sudden blood pressure increase, the kidney of these patients responds with a passive vasodilation and a glomerular filtration rate increase without any activation of humoral modulatory substances. The impairment in renal adaptation capacity may predispose these patients to renal injury, particularly in the presence of the many hypertensive peaks which characterize everyday life of elderly individuals. In conclusion, these results show that renal adaptation capacity of elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension is completely lost. Further studies will elucidate whether antihypertensive treatment per se, or specific classes of antihypertensive drugs, are able to revert this impairment.