SVA Retrotransposons and a Low Copy Repeat in Humans and Great Apes: A Mobile Connection

Segmental duplications (SDs) constitute a considerable fraction of primate genomes. They contribute to genetic variation and provide raw material for evolution. Groups of SDs are characterized by the presence of shared core duplicons. One of these core duplicons, low copy repeat (lcr)16a, has been shown to be particularly active in the propagation of interspersed SDs in primates. The underlying mechanisms are, however, only partially understood. Alu short interspersed elements (SINEs) are frequently found at breakpoints and have been implicated in the expansion of SDs.Detailed analysis of lcr16a-containing SDs shows that the hominid-specific SVA (SINE-R-VNTR-Alu) retrotransposon is an integral component of the core duplicon in Asian and African great apes. In orang-utan, it provides breakpoints and contributes to both interchromosomal and intrachromosomal lcr16a mobility by inter-element recombination. Furthermore, the data suggest that in hominines (human, chimpanzee, gorilla) SVA recombination-mediated integration of a circular intermediate is the founding event of a lineage-specific lcr16a expansion. One of the hominine lcr16a copies displays large flanking direct repeats, a structural feature shared by other SDs in the human genome.Taken together, the results obtained extend the range of SVAs’ contribution to genome evolution from RNA-mediated transduction to DNA-based recombination. In addition, they provide further support for a role of circular intermediates in SD mobilization.     

Proteogenomic review of the changes in primate apoC-I during evolution

Apolipoprotein C-I has evolved more rapidly than any of the other soluble apolipoproteins. During the course of primate evolution, the gene for this apolipoprotein was duplicated. Prompted by our observation that the two resulting genes encode two distinct forms of apoC-I in great apes, we have reviewed both the genomic and proteomic data to examine what changes have occurred during the course of primate evolution. We have found data showing that one of the duplicated genes, known to be a pseudogene in humans, was also a pseudogene in Denisovans and Neandertals. Using genomic and proteomic data for primates, we will provide in this review evidence that the duplication took place after the divergence of New World monkeys from the human lineage and that the formation of the pseudogene took place after the divergence of the bonobos and chimpanzees from the human lineage.     

Segmental duplications in the human genome reveal details of pseudogene formation

Duplicated pseudogenes in the human genome are disabled copies of functioning parent genes. They result from block duplication events occurring throughout evolutionary history. Relatively recent duplications (with sequence similarity ≥90% and length ≥1 kb) are termed segmental duplications (SDs); here, we analyze the interrelationship of SDs and pseudogenes. We present a decision-tree approach to classify pseudogenes based on their (and their parents’) characteristics in relation to SDs. The classification identifies 140 novel pseudogenes and makes possible improved annotation for the 3172 pseudogenes located in SDs. In particular, it reveals that many pseudogenes in SDs likely did not arise directly from parent genes, but are the result of a multi-step process. In these cases, the initial duplication or retrotransposition of a parent gene gives rise to a ‘parent pseudogene’, followed by further duplication creating duplicated–duplicated or duplicated–processed pseudogenes, respectively. Moreover, we can precisely identify these parent pseudogenes by overlap with ancestral SD loci. Finally, a comparison of nucleotide substitutions per site in a pseudogene with its surrounding SD region allows us to estimate the time difference between duplication and disablement events, and this suggests that most duplicated pseudogenes in SDs were likely disabled around the time of the original duplication.     

An evolution revolution provides further revelation

The extent of copy-number variation (CNV) in the human genome has been appreciated only recently. Nevertheless, for almost four decades, gene duplication has been a prevailing hypothesis for evolutionary change. Recently, gene CNV spanning 60 million years of human and primate evolution has been determined enabling lineage-specific gene CNV to be identified. Primate lineage-specific gene CNV studies reveal that almost one third of all human genes exhibit a copy-number change in one or more primate species. Intriguingly, human lineage-specific gene amplification can be correlated to the emergence of human-specific traits such as cognition and endurance running.     

Structure and evolution of primate cytochrome c oxidase subunit II gene

The sequence of cytochrome oxidase subunit II (COII) mRNA from the cynomolgus macaque has been determined. Availability of the sequence from a non-human primate has allowed examination of the evolution of the COII gene and protein along the primate lineage. Comparison with existing protein and DNA sequences, combined with estimates of divergence derived from calculations designed to compensate for multiple mutation and reversion events, indicates that although the rate of fixation of nucleotide substitutions at silent sites is somewhat lower in primates than non-primates, the rate of fixation at replacement sites is 4-5-fold higher. The data also suggest that the rate of divergence at replacement sites along the primate lineage has not been uniform, but has decreased 2-2.5-fold since the higher primate branch point, in the absence of a comparable change in the rate substitution at silent sites. Both primate mRNAs differ from their non-primate homologues in having 3'-untranslated regions of 20-25 nucleotides. Examination of the monkey and human untranslated sequences suggests that these regions have evolved by duplication events occurring in both cases within 2-3 nucleotides following the translational stop codon. The primate mRNAs are also exceptional in that both can form stable stem and loop structures immediately preceding the postulated duplication site that may have played a role in facilitating the mutational events involved. Comparison of the human and monkey protein sequences has revealed regions conserved in primates that are significantly more hydrophobic than their non-primate counterparts. The possible effects of these alterations on the interaction between COII and cytochrome c are discussed.     

Analysis of segmental duplications reveals a distinct pattern of continuation-of-synteny between human and mouse genomes

About 5% of the human genome consists of large-scale duplicated segments of almost identical sequences. Segmental duplications (SDs) have been proposed to be involved in non-allelic homologous recombination leading to recurrent genomic variation and disease. It has also been suggested that these SDs are associated with syntenic rearrangements that have shaped the human genome. We have analyzed 14 members of a single family of closely related SDs in the human genome, some of which are associated with common inversion polymorphisms at chromosomes 8p23 and 4p16. Comparative analysis with the mouse genome revealed syntenic inversions for these two human polymorphic loci. In addition, 12 of the 14 SDs, while absent in the mouse genome, occur at the breaks of synteny; suggesting a non-random involvement of these sequences in genome evolution. Furthermore, we observed a syntenic familial relationship between 8 and 12 breakpoint-loci, where broken synteny that ends at one family member resumes at another, even across different chromosomes. Subsequent genome-wide assessment revealed that this relationship, which we named continuation-of-synteny, is not limited to the 8p23 family and occurs 46 times in the human genome with high frequency at specific chromosomes. Our analysis supports a non-random breakage model of genomic evolution with an active involvement of segmental duplications for specific regions of the human genome. Electronic supplementary material Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at and is accessible for authorized users.     

The Macroevolution of our Ancient Lineage: What We Know (or Think We Know) about Early Hominin Diversity

Quantitative, evolutionary models that incorporate within- and between-species variation are critical for interpreting the fossil record of human diversity, and for making taxonomic distinctions. However, small sample sizes, sexual dimorphism, temporal trends, geographic variation, and the limited number of relevant extant models have always made the consideration of variation difficult for paleoanthropologists. Here we provide a brief overview of current early hominin diversity. We then argue that for many species our limited understanding of within species variation hampers our ability to make taxonomic decisions with any level of statistical certainty. Perhaps more significantly, the underlying causes of between-species variation among early hominins are poorly studied. There have been few attempts to correlate aspects of the phenotype with meaningful evidence for niche differentiation, to demonstrate the selective advantage of traits, or to provide other evidence for macroevolutionary divergence. Moreover, current depictions of vast pattern (but not size) diversity are inconsistent with expectations derived from most other extant primate clades that have adaptively radiated. If indeed the early hominin record is highly speciose, the reasons for this remain unclear.     

An anthropoid-specific segmental duplication on human chromosome 1q22

Segmental duplications (SDs) play a key role in genome evolution by providing material for gene diversification and creation of variant or novel functions. They also mediate recombinations, resulting in microdeletions, which have occasionally been associated with human genetic diseases. Here, we present a detailed analysis of a large genomic region (about 240 kb), located on human chromosome 1q22, that contains a tandem SD, SD1q22. This duplication occurred about 37 million years ago in a lineage leading to anthropoid primates, after their separation from prosimians but before the Old and New World monkey split. We reconstructed the hypothetical unduplicated ancestral locus and compared it with the extant SD1q22 region. Our data demonstrate that, as a consequence of the duplication, new anthropoid-specific genetic material has evolved in the resulting paralogous segments. We describe the emergence of two new genes, whose new functions could contribute to the speciation of anthropoid primates. Moreover, we provide detailed information regarding structure and evolution of the SD1q22 region that is a prerequisite for future studies of its anthropoid-specific functions and possible linkage to human genetic disorders.     

Expanding whole exome resequencing into non-human primates

Background  

Complete exome resequencing has the power to greatly expand our understanding of non-human primate genomes. This includes both a better appreciation of the variation that exists in non-human primate model species, but also an improved annotation of their genomes. By developing an understanding of the variation between individuals, non-human primate models of human disease can be better developed. This effort is hindered largely by the lack of comprehensive information on specific non-human primate genetic variation and the costs of generating these data. If the tools that have been developed in humans for complete exome resequencing can be applied to closely related non-human primate species, then these difficulties can be circumvented.     

The primate psi beta 1 gene. An ancient beta-globin pseudogene

The human beta-globin gene cluster contains five functional genes plus a single pseudogene termed psi beta 1. Hybridization and comparative sequence analysis show that this pseudogene is not the product of a recent gene duplication, but is ancient and has been maintained in all major primate groups ranging from prosimians to anthropoids, at the same position as in man, between gamma- and delta-globin genes. In the lemur, a prosimian, the central exons of the psi beta 1 and delta-globin genes have undergone an unequal exchange, which has resulted in a contraction of the beta-globin gene cluster and the formation of a Lepore-type psi beta 1-delta globin pseudogene. Comparisons of defects shared by prosimian, New World monkey and human psi beta 1 sequences suggest that the ancestral primate gene was probably a pseudogene with an abnormal initiation codon but few if any additional defects, and that most contemporary pseudogene defects were accumulated relatively recently by slow neutral drift. We suggest that psi beta 1 arose early in primate evolution by silencing of a pre-existing discrete functional gene, and show that psi beta 1-related sequences are also present in other mammalian orders. In view of the antiquity of psi beta 1-related sequences, we propose that this gene be renamed the eta-globin gene.     

The relative rate of DNA evolution in primates

In 73 relative-rate tests involving the sequences of 17 genes between humans and six nonhuman primate taxa, there is only one significant (P less than 0.01) difference in evolutionary rate--i.e., that between human and Old World-monkey psi eta-globin genes. No evolutionary rate difference between humans and Old World monkeys is evident from analysis of 18 other genes with a total length of 6 kb. This and the comparison, between humans and other primate taxa, of new extended psi eta-globin sequences suggest that earlier observations of evolutionary-rate differences between humans and other primates were based on differences that are peculiar to psi eta-globin and that are not representative of the whole genome, which appears to be evolving at a stochastically uniform rate. This is supported by whole-genome single-copy DNA and mitochondrial DNA comparisons, neither of which shows any evidence of evolutionary-rate variation among primate taxa. Uniformity in the evolutionary rate of the DNA of primate and other mammalian taxa is inconsistent with current mammalian fossil-record interpretation. Either there has been a general slowing down in rate across lineages or the fossil record has been misinterpreted.     

Rates of DNA Duplication and Mitochondrial DNA Insertion in the Human Genome

The hundreds of mitochondrial pseudogenes in the human nuclear genome sequence (numts) constitute an excellent system for studying and dating DNA duplications and insertions. These pseudogenes are associated with many complete mitochondrial genome sequences and through those with a good fossil record. By comparing individual numts with primate and other mammalian mitochondrial genome sequences, we estimate that these numts arose continuously over the last 58 million years. Our pairwise comparisons between numts suggest that most human numts arose from different mitochondrial insertion events and not by DNA duplication within the nuclear genome. The nuclear genome appears to accumulate mtDNA insertions at a rate high enough to predict within-population polymorphism for the presence/absence of many recent mtDNA insertions. Pairwise analysis of numts and their flanking DNA produces an estimate for the DNA duplication rate in humans of 2.2 × 10^–9 per numt per year. Thus, a nucleotide site is about as likely to be involved in a duplication event as it is to change by point substitution. This estimate of the rate of DNA duplication of noncoding DNA is based on sequences that are not in duplication hotspots, and is close to the rate reported for functional genes in other species.     

Opsin gene duplication and divergence in ray-finned fish

Opsin gene sequences were first reported in the 1980s. The goal of that research was to test the hypothesis that human opsins were members of a single gene family and that variation in human color vision was mediated by mutations in these genes. While the new data supported both hypotheses, the greatest contribution of this work was, arguably, that it provided the data necessary for PCR-based surveys in a diversity of other species. Such studies, and recent whole genome sequencing projects, have uncovered exceptionally large opsin gene repertoires in ray-finned fishes (taxon, Actinopterygii). Guppies and zebrafish, for example, have 10 visual opsin genes each. Here we review the duplication and divergence events that have generated these gene collections. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that large opsin gene repertories in fish have been generated by gene duplication and divergence events that span the age of the ray-finned fishes. Data from whole genome sequencing projects and from large-insert clones show that tandem duplication is the primary mode of opsin gene family expansion in fishes. In some instances gene conversion between tandem duplicates has obscured evolutionary relationships among genes and generated unique key-site haplotypes. We mapped amino acid substitutions at so-called key-sites onto phylogenies and this exposed many examples of convergence. We found that dN/dS values were higher on the branches of our trees that followed gene duplication than on branches that followed speciation events, suggesting that duplication relaxes constraints on opsin sequence evolution. Though the focus of the review is opsin sequence evolution, we also note that there are few clear connections between opsin gene repertoires and variation in spectral environment, morphological traits, or life history traits.     

Subfunction partitioning, the teleost radiation and the annotation of the human genome

Half of all vertebrate species are teleost fish. What accounts for this explosion of biodiversity? Recent evidence and advances in evolutionary theory suggest that genomic features could have played a significant role in the teleost radiation. This review examines evidence for an ancient whole-genome duplication (tetraploidization) event that probably occurred just before the teleost radiation. The partitioning of ancestral subfunctions between gene copies arising from this duplication could have contributed to the genetic isolation of populations, to lineage-specific diversification of developmental programs, and ultimately to phenotypic variation among teleost fish. Beyond its importance for understanding mechanisms that generate biodiversity, the partitioning of subfunctions between teleost co-orthologs of human genes can facilitate the identification of tissue-specific conserved noncoding regions and can simplify the analysis of ancestral gene functions obscured by pleiotropy or haploinsufficiency. Applying these principles on a genomic scale can accelerate the functional annotation of the human genome and understanding of the roles of human genes in health and disease.     

The energetic cost of locomotion: humans and primates compared to generalized endotherms

A wide range of selective pressures have been advanced as possible causes for the adoption of bipedalism in the hominin lineage. One suggestion has been that because modern human walking is relatively efficient compared to that of a typical quadruped, the ancestral quadruped may have reaped an energetic advantage when it walked on two legs. While it has become clear that human walking is relatively efficient and human running inefficient compared to "generalized endotherms", workers differ in their opinion of how the cost of human bipedal locomotion compares to that of a generalized primate walking quadrupedally. One view is that human walking is particularly efficient in comparison to other primates. The present study addresses this by comparing the cost of human walking and running to that of the eight primate species for which data are available and by comparing cost in primates to that of a "generalized endotherm". There is no evidence that primate locomotion is more costly than that of a generalized endotherm, although more data on adult Old World monkeys and apes would be useful. Further, human locomotion does not appear to be particularly efficient relative to that of other primates.