Lessons learned through listening to biology students during a transition to online learning in the wake of the COVID‐19 pandemic

During the Spring Semester of 2020, an outbreak of a novel coronavirus (SARS‐CoV‐2) and the illnesses it caused (COVID‐19) led to widespread cancelling of on‐campus instruction at colleges and universities in the United States and other countries around the world. Response to the pandemic in university settings included a rapid and unexpected shift to online learning for faculty and students. The transition to teaching and learning online posed many challenges, and the experiences of students during this crisis may inform future planning for distance learning experiences during the ongoing pandemic and beyond. Herein, we discuss the experiences of first‐ and second‐year university students enrolled in a biology seminar course as their classes migrated to online environments. Drawing on reported student experiences and prior research and resources, we discuss the ways we will adjust our own teaching for future iterations of the course while offering recommendations for instructors tasked with teaching in online environments.     

Strength is in engagement: The rise of an online scientific community during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Many scientists, confined to home office by COVID‐19, have been gathering in online communities, which could become viable alternatives to physical meetings and conferences. Subject Categories: S&S: Careers & Training, Methods & Resources, S&S: Ethics

As COVID‐19 has brought work and travel to a grinding halt, scientists explored new ways to connect with each other. For the gene regulation community, this started with a Tweet that quickly expanded into the “Fragile Nucleosome” online forum, a popular seminar series, and many intimate discussions connecting scientists all over the world. More than 2,500 people from over 45 countries have attended our seminars so far and our forum currently has ~ 1,000 members who have kick‐started discussion groups and mentorship opportunities. Here we discuss our experience with setting up the Fragile Nucleosome seminars and online discussion forum, and present the tools to enable others to do the same.Too often, we forget the importance of social interactions in science. Indeed, many creative ideas originated from impromptu and fortuitous encounters with peers, in passing, over lunch, or during a conference coffee break. Now, the ongoing COVID‐19 crisis means prolonged isolation, odd working hours, and less social interactions for most scientists confined to home. This motivated us to create the “Fragile Nucleosome” virtual community for our colleagues in the chromatin and gene regulation field.

… the ongoing COVID‐19 crisis means prolonged isolation, odd working hours and less social interactions for most scientists confined to home.

While the need to address the void created by the COVID‐19 pandemic triggered our actions, a large part of the international community already has had limited access to research networks in our field. Our initiative offered new opportunities though, in particular for those who have not benefited from extensive networks, showing how virtual communities can address disparities in accessibility. This should not be a stop‐gap measure during the pandemic: Once we come out from our isolation, we still need to address the drawbacks of in‐person scientific conferences/seminars, such as economic disparities, travel inaccessibility, and overlapping family responsibilities (Sarabipour, 2020). Our virtual community offers some solutions to the standing challenges (Levine & Rathmell, 2020), and we hope our commentary can help start conversations about the advantages of virtual communities in a post‐pandemic world.

… once we come out from our isolation we still need to address the drawbacks of in‐person scientific conferences/seminars, such as economic disparities, travel inaccessibility and overlapping family responsibilities…

     

Lessons from the Ebola epidemics and their applications for COVID‐19 pandemic response in sub‐Saharan Africa

COVID‐19, caused by a novel coronavirus named SARS‐CoV‐2, was identified in December 2019, in Wuhan, China. It was first confirmed in sub‐Saharan Africa in Nigeria on 27 February 2020 and has since spread quickly to all sub‐Saharan African countries, causing more than 111,309 confirmed cases and 2,498 deaths as of 03 June 2020. The lessons learned during the recent Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreaks in some sub‐Saharan African countries were expected to shape and influence the region’s responses to COVID‐19 pandemic. However, some of the challenges associated with the management of the EVD outbreaks persist and create obstacles for the effective management of the COVID‐19 pandemic. This article describes the commonalities between the EVD epidemics and COVID‐19 pandemic, with a view to draw on lessons learned to effectively tackle the ongoing pandemic. Key successes, failures and lessons learned from previous EVD outbreaks are discussed. Recommendations on how these lessons can be translated to strengthen the COVID‐19 response in sub‐Saharan Africa are provided.     

Vitamin D and COVID‐19: A review on the role of vitamin D in preventing and reducing the severity of COVID‐19 infection

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is a pathogenic coronavirus causing COVID‐19 infection. The interaction between the SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein and the human receptor angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2, both of which contain several cysteine residues, is impacted by the disulfide‐thiol balance in the host cell. The host cell redox status is affected by oxidative stress due to the imbalance between the reactive oxygen/nitrogen species and antioxidants. Recent studies have shown that Vitamin D supplementation could reduce oxidative stress. It has also been proposed that vitamin D at physiological concentration has preventive effects on many viral infections, including COVID‐19. However, the molecular‐level picture of the interplay of vitamin D deficiency, oxidative stress, and the severity of COVID‐19 has remained unclear. Herein, we present a thorough review focusing on the possible molecular mechanism by which vitamin D could alter host cell redox status and block viral entry, thereby preventing COVID‐19 infection or reducing the severity of the disease.     

COVID‐19 Disease Map,a computational knowledge repository of virus‐host interaction mechanisms

The authors requested to correct the spelling of Egon Willighagen and Andrea Senff‐Ribeiro''s names, as well as the following affiliations: Charles Auffray to: “European Institute for Systems Biology and Medicine (EISBM), Vourles, France”; Noriko Hiori to: “Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio Research Institute at SFC, Keio University, Kanagawa, Japan”; and Leonard Schmeister to: “Center for Mathematics, Chair of Mathematical Modeling of Biological Systems, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany and Helmholtz Zentrum München – German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Computational Biology, Neuherberg, Germany”.     

Cardiovascular and haematological events post COVID‐19 vaccination: A systematic review

Since COVID‐19 took a strong hold around the globe causing considerable morbidity and mortality, a lot of effort was dedicated to manufacturing effective vaccines against SARS‐CoV‐2. Many questions have since been raised surrounding the safety of the vaccines, and a lot of media attention to certain side effects. This caused a state of vaccine hesitancy that may prove problematic in the global effort to control the virus. This review was undertaken with the aim of putting together all the reported cardiovascular and haematological events post COVID‐19 vaccination in published literature and to suggest possible mechanisms to explain these rare phenomena.     

The COVID‐19 pandemic: agile versus blundering communication during a worldwide crisis: Important lessons for efficient communication to maintain public trust and ensure public safety

Governments’ measures to control the COVID‐19 pandemic and public reaction hold important lessons for science and risk communication in times of crisis.

The world is in the grips of a global pandemic, the end of which is not yet in sight. Nations struggle to deal with the severe health, economic and social impacts of COVID‐19 with varying success. Their ability to handle this crisis depends on many factors, some of which, such as the availability of vaccines, are variable, while others – geographical location or population density – are determined. More importantly though, public health infrastructures, political will and action, and clear communication have so far proved to be the most successful levers for coping with the pandemic. This article examines how political will and communication in particular have helped to alleviate the impact of the virus in some countries.

… public health infrastructures, political will and action, and clear communication have so far proved to be the most successful levers for coping with the pandemic.

News that a new virus had emerged in Wuhan, China, was just of fleeting interest for most people in December 2019. This changed rapidly: by March 2020, large parts of the world had gone into lockdown to curtail the rapid spread of SARS‐CoV‐2. Many governments issued more or less harsh restrictions on private contacts, travel and other freedoms, followed by easing these regulations during the summer, which precipitated new outbreaks in the fall along with mutations of the virus that triggered new restrictions; it is likely that this pattern will continue until a sufficient number of people are vaccinated to achieve herd immunity.COVID‐19 came “out of the blue”, hit a largely unprepared human population and has therefore affected human civilisation in an unprecedented manner (Fig 1). People are not only concerned about their health: as the pandemic continues, citizens also worry about the social, economic and psychological impacts. Even though vaccination programmes are under way, only a few countries will be able to achieve herd immunity by the summer; in the meantime, public acceptance for the ongoing restrictions of freedom are waning as the negative social and economic effects become more urgent. Thus, political action and planning along with efficient communication in particular are crucially important to ensure the public’s understanding of the situation and maintain acceptance for restrictive measure until enough vaccines become available. The antipodes in communication strategies were a mixture of evidence‐based messages, transparency, building confidence and open discussion of scientific uncertainty to gain and maintain public trust versus the unfettered spread of alternative facts, targeted disinformation and omission of important information that eventually eroded said trust.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Fear in times of COVID‐19An elderly pedestrian wearing a face mask due to the COVID‐19 pandemic, walks past graffiti depicting the subjects within famous artworks, in Glasgow on 2 September 2020 after the Scottish government imposed fresh restrictions on the city after a rise in cases of the novel coronavirus (© Andy Buchanan/AFP via Getty Images)

… political action and planning along with efficient communication in particular are crucially important to ensure the public’s understanding of the situation and maintain acceptance for restrictive measure…

     

Thalassaemia is paradoxically associated with a reduced risk of in‐hospital complications and mortality in COVID‐19: Data from an international registry

Although numerous patient‐specific co‐factors have been shown to be associated with worse outcomes in COVID‐19, the prognostic value of thalassaemic syndromes in COVID‐19 patients remains poorly understood. We studied the outcomes of 137 COVID‐19 patients with a history of transfusion‐dependent thalassaemia (TDT) and transfusion independent thalassaemia (TIT) extracted from a large international cohort and compared them with the outcomes from a matched cohort of COVID‐19 patients with no history of thalassaemia. The mean age of thalassaemia patients included in our study was 41 ± 16 years (48.9% male). Almost 81% of these patients suffered from TDT requiring blood transfusions on a regular basis. 38.7% of patients were blood group O. Cardiac iron overload was documented in 6.8% of study patients, whereas liver iron overload was documented in 35% of study patients. 40% of thalassaemia patients had a history of splenectomy. 27.7% of study patients required hospitalization due to COVID‐19 infection. Amongst the hospitalized patients, one patient died (0.7%) and one patient required intubation. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was required in almost 5% of study patients. After adjustment for age‐, sex‐ and other known risk factors (cardiac disease, kidney disease and pulmonary disease), the rate of in‐hospital complications (supplemental oxygen use, admission to an intensive care unit for CPAP therapy or intubation) and all‐cause mortality was significantly lower in the thalassaemia group compared to the matched cohort with no history of thalassaemia. Amongst thalassaemia patients in general, the TIT group exhibited a higher rate of hospitalization compared to the TDT group (p = 0.001). In addition, the rate of complications such as acute kidney injury and need for supplemental oxygen was significantly higher in the TIT group compared to the TDT group. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, age and history of heart or kidney disease were all found to be independent risk factors for increased in‐hospital, all‐cause mortality, whereas the presence of thalassaemia (either TDT or TIT) was found to be independently associated with reduced all‐cause mortality. The presence of thalassaemia in COVID‐19 patients was independently associated with lower in‐hospital, all‐cause mortality and few in‐hospital complications in our study. The pathophysiology of this is unclear and needs to be studied in vitro and in animal models.     

COVID‐19 and the opportunities for research: The lockdowns’ impacts on wildlife,ecology and conservation biology,and the humanities

The ongoing lockdowns provide ideal conditions to study the relationship between wildlife and humans but among humans themselves. Subject Categories: Ecology, S&S: History & Philosophy of Science

Almost all research has been affected in some way or another by the COVID‐19 pandemic, at the very least by challenging collaboration and interaction. But some areas have been affected more than others. Ecology and conservation biology experience a real boon as ongoing lockdowns have presented unique opportunities to study the impact of human activities on animals and ecosystems. This has not just galvanised research but also promises to leave a legacy of networks and collaborations to explore means to reduce negative human impacts on biodiversity long after the pandemic has subsided. In the social sciences and humanities, however, the pandemic is raising fundamental questions about their ability to contribute meaningfully to inform policy and public health responses.

In the social sciences and humanities […] the pandemic is raising fundamental questions about their ability to contribute meaningfully to inform policy and public health responses.