Comparison of the outcomes of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to the ipsilateral and contralateral auditory cortex in unilateral tinnitus

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive method of activating or deactivating focal areas of the human brain. Repetitive TMS (rTMS) applied over the temporoparietal cortex has been reported to show therapeutic effects on tinnitus. We compared the effects of 1?Hz rTMS delivered either contralaterally or ipsilaterally to the symptomatic ear in patients with unilateral tinnitus. Forty patients with asymmetric hearing loss and non-pulsatile tinnitus localized to poorer ear of 6 months in duration or greater who were refractory to medication were enrolled in this study. Patients were assigned randomly to one of two treatment groups: with 1?Hz stimulation applied the temporoparietal junction either ipsilaterally (n?=?21) or contralaterally (n?=?19) to the symptomatic ear. The patients were given 600 pulses per session daily for 5?d. Changes in the tinnitus handicap inventory (THI) and self-rating visual analog scores (VAS) for loudness, awareness and annoyance were analyzed before, immediately after and 1 month after treatment. There was no significant difference in the rate of patients with marked improvement between ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation groups. In addition, there were no significant differences in the amount of decreases in THI scores and VAS between the two groups immediately or 1 month after rTMS. Finally, significant decreases in THI scores and most VAS were observed 1 month after rTMS in both groups compared to pretreatment. Daily treatment with 1?Hz rTMS ipsilaterally and contralaterally to the side of tinnitus both had significant beneficial effects. The laterality of stimulation with 1?Hz rTMS is not the decisive factor in relieving symptoms.     

Utilizing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Language Function in Stroke Patients with Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been shown to significantly improve language function in patients with non-fluent aphasia¹. In this experiment, we demonstrate the administration of low-frequency repetitive TMS (rTMS) to an optimal stimulation site in the right hemisphere in patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia. A battery of standardized language measures is administered in order to assess baseline performance. Patients are subsequently randomized to either receive real rTMS or initial sham stimulation. Patients in the real stimulation undergo a site-finding phase, comprised of a series of six rTMS sessions administered over five days; stimulation is delivered to a different site in the right frontal lobe during each of these sessions. Each site-finding session consists of 600 pulses of 1 Hz rTMS, preceded and followed by a picture-naming task. By comparing the degree of transient change in naming ability elicited by stimulation of candidate sites, we are able to locate the area of optimal response for each individual patient. We then administer rTMS to this site during the treatment phase. During treatment, patients undergo a total of ten days of stimulation over the span of two weeks; each session is comprised of 20 min of 1 Hz rTMS delivered at 90% resting motor threshold. Stimulation is paired with an fMRI-naming task on the first and last days of treatment. After the treatment phase is complete, the language battery obtained at baseline is repeated two and six months following stimulation in order to identify rTMS-induced changes in performance. The fMRI-naming task is also repeated two and six months following treatment. Patients who are randomized to the sham arm of the study undergo sham site-finding, sham treatment, fMRI-naming studies, and repeat language testing two months after completing sham treatment. Sham patients then cross over into the real stimulation arm, completing real site-finding, real treatment, fMRI, and two- and six-month post-stimulation language testing.     

Visualizing the effects of rTMS in a patient sample: small N vs. group level analysis

The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess changes in cortical excitability is a tool used with increased prevalence in healthy and impaired populations. One factor of concern with this technique is how to achieve adequate statistical power given constraints of a small number of subjects and variability in responses. This paper compares a single pulse excitability measure using traditional group-level statistics vs single subject analyses in a patient population of subjects with focal hand dystonia, pre and post repetitive TMS (rTMS). Results show significant differences in cortical excitability for 4/5 subjects using a split middle line analysis on plots of individual subject data. Group level statistics (ANOVA), however, did not detect any significant findings. The consideration of single subject statistics for TMS excitability measures may assist researchers in describing the variably of rTMS outcome measures.     

Therapeutic application of rTMS in neurodegenerative and movement disorders: A review

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive form of brain stimulation that makes use of the magnetic field generated when an electric current passes through a magnetic coil placed over the scalp. It can be applied as a single stimulus at a time, in pairs of stimuli, or repetitively in trains of stimuli (repetitive TMS, rTMS). RTMS can induce changes in brain activity, whose after-effects reflect the processes of long-term potentiation and long-term depression, as certain protocols, namely those using low frequencies (≤1 Hz) seem to suppress cortical excitability, while those using high frequencies (>1 Hz) seem to enhance it. It is a technique with very few and mostly mild side-effects, whose effects can persist for long time periods, and as such, it has been studied as a potential treatment option in a multitude of neurodegenerative diseases, including those affecting movement. Although rTMS has received approval as a treatment strategy of only a few aspects in movement disorders in the latest guidelines, its further use seems to also be promising in their context. In this review, we gathered the available literature on the therapeutic application of rTMS in movement disorders, namely Parkinson’s disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Huntington’s disease, Dystonia, Tic disorders and Essential Tremor.     

经颅磁刺激联合高压氧（HBO)治疗脑梗死240 例临床疗效分析

目的:观察经颅磁刺激(transcranial magnetic stimulation,TMS)联合高压氧(hyperbaricoxygen,HBO)治疗脑梗死的临床疗效。方法:采用随机数字表法将240例脑梗死患者分为联合治疗组、HBO组及常规组,每组80例。常规组患者给予常规治疗,HBO组患者在常规干预基础上辅以HBO治疗,联合治疗组患者则在常规干预基础上辅以HBO及TMS联合治疗。上述治疗均以10 d为1个疗程,共治疗2个疗程。于治疗前、治疗2个疗程后比较各组患者神经功能缺损程度,并同时于上述时间点检测各组患者中枢运动传导时间(CMCT)及血清中脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)、神经生长因子(NGF)表达情况。结果:各组患者分别经2个疗程治疗后,发现联合治疗组NIHSS评分、总有效率均显著优于HBO组及常规组水平(均P0.05);另外联合治疗组血清中BDNF含量与NGF含量均较治疗前明显升高(P0.05),与常规组及HBO组间差异亦具有统计学意义(均P0.05)。结论:TMS联合HBO治疗脑梗死具有协同作用,能进一步改善患者受损神经功能及日常生活质量,其治疗机制可能与增强神经营养因子表达有关。     

Toward establishing a therapeutic window for rTMS by theta burst stimulation

In this issue of Neuron, Huang et al. show that a version of the classic theta burst stimulation protocol used to induce LTP/LTD in brain slices can be adapted to a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocol to rapidly produce long lasting (up to an hour), reversible effects on motor cortex physiology and behavior. These results may have important implications for the development of clinical applications of rTMS in the treatment of depression, epilepsy, Parkinson's, and other diseases.     

Improvement of tactile discrimination performance and enlargement of cortical somatosensory maps after 5 Hz rTMS

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is increasingly used to investigate mechanisms of brain functions and plasticity, but also as a promising new therapeutic tool. The effects of rTMS depend on the intensity and frequency of stimulation and consist of changes of cortical excitability, which often persists several minutes after termination of rTMS. While these findings imply that cortical processing can be altered by applying current pulses from outside the brain, little is known about how rTMS persistently affects learning and perception. Here we demonstrate in humans, through a combination of psychophysical assessment of two-point discrimination thresholds and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), that brief periods of 5 Hz rTMS evoke lasting perceptual and cortical changes. rTMS was applied over the cortical representation of the right index finger of primary somatosensory cortex, resulting in a lowering of discrimination thresholds of the right index finger. fMRI revealed an enlargement of the right index finger representation in primary somatosensory cortex that was linearly correlated with the individual rTMS-induced perceptual improvement indicative of a close link between cortical and perceptual changes. The results demonstrate that repetitive, unattended stimulation from outside the brain, combined with a lack of behavioral information, are effective in driving persistent improvement of the perception of touch. The underlying properties and processes that allow cortical networks, after being modified through TMS pulses, to reach new organized stable states that mediate better performance remain to be clarified.     

Mapping the After-effects of Theta Burst Stimulation on the Human Auditory Cortex with Functional Imaging

Auditory cortex pertains to the processing of sound, which is at the basis of speech or music-related processing¹. However, despite considerable recent progress, the functional properties and lateralization of the human auditory cortex are far from being fully understood. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive technique that can transiently or lastingly modulate cortical excitability via the application of localized magnetic field pulses, and represents a unique method of exploring plasticity and connectivity. It has only recently begun to be applied to understand auditory cortical function ². An important issue in using TMS is that the physiological consequences of the stimulation are difficult to establish. Although many TMS studies make the implicit assumption that the area targeted by the coil is the area affected, this need not be the case, particularly for complex cognitive functions which depend on interactions across many brain regions ³. One solution to this problem is to combine TMS with functional Magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The idea here is that fMRI will provide an index of changes in brain activity associated with TMS. Thus, fMRI would give an independent means of assessing which areas are affected by TMS and how they are modulated ⁴. In addition, fMRI allows the assessment of functional connectivity, which represents a measure of the temporal coupling between distant regions. It can thus be useful not only to measure the net activity modulation induced by TMS in given locations, but also the degree to which the network properties are affected by TMS, via any observed changes in functional connectivity.Different approaches exist to combine TMS and functional imaging according to the temporal order of the methods. Functional MRI can be applied before, during, after, or both before and after TMS. Recently, some studies interleaved TMS and fMRI in order to provide online mapping of the functional changes induced by TMS ^5-7. However, this online combination has many technical problems, including the static artifacts resulting from the presence of the TMS coil in the scanner room, or the effects of TMS pulses on the process of MR image formation. But more importantly, the loud acoustic noise induced by TMS (increased compared with standard use because of the resonance of the scanner bore) and the increased TMS coil vibrations (caused by the strong mechanical forces due to the static magnetic field of the MR scanner) constitute a crucial problem when studying auditory processing. This is one reason why fMRI was carried out before and after TMS in the present study. Similar approaches have been used to target the motor cortex ^8,9, premotor cortex ¹⁰, primary somatosensory cortex ^11,12 and language-related areas ¹³, but so far no combined TMS-fMRI study has investigated the auditory cortex. The purpose of this article is to provide details concerning the protocol and considerations necessary to successfully combine these two neuroscientific tools to investigate auditory processing. Previously we showed that repetitive TMS (rTMS) at high and low frequencies (resp. 10 Hz and 1 Hz) applied over the auditory cortex modulated response time (RT) in a melody discrimination task ². We also showed that RT modulation was correlated with functional connectivity in the auditory network assessed using fMRI: the higher the functional connectivity between left and right auditory cortices during task performance, the higher the facilitatory effect (i.e. decreased RT) observed with rTMS. However those findings were mainly correlational, as fMRI was performed before rTMS. Here, fMRI was carried out before and immediately after TMS to provide direct measures of the functional organization of the auditory cortex, and more specifically of the plastic reorganization of the auditory neural network occurring after the neural intervention provided by TMS. Combined fMRI and TMS applied over the auditory cortex should enable a better understanding of brain mechanisms of auditory processing, providing physiological information about functional effects of TMS. This knowledge could be useful for many cognitive neuroscience applications, as well as for optimizing therapeutic applications of TMS, particularly in auditory-related disorders.     

Monitoring Cortical Excitability during Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Children with ADHD: A Single-Blind,Sham-Controlled TMS-EEG Study

Background

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) allows non-invasive stimulation of the human brain. However, no suitable marker has yet been established to monitor the immediate rTMS effects on cortical areas in children.

Objective

TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEPs) could present a well-suited marker for real-time monitoring. Monitoring is particularly important in children where only few data about rTMS effects and safety are currently available.

Methods

In a single-blind sham-controlled study, twenty-five school-aged children with ADHD received subthreshold 1 Hz-rTMS to the primary motor cortex. The TMS-evoked N100 was measured by 64-channel-EEG pre, during and post rTMS, and compared to sham stimulation as an intraindividual control condition.

Results

TMS-evoked N100 amplitude decreased during 1 Hz-rTMS and, at the group level, reached a stable plateau after approximately 500 pulses. N100 amplitude to supra-threshold single pulses post rTMS confirmed the amplitude reduction in comparison to the pre-rTMS level while sham stimulation had no influence. EEG source analysis indicated that the TMS-evoked N100 change reflected rTMS effects in the stimulated motor cortex. Amplitude changes in TMS-evoked N100 and MEPs (pre versus post 1 Hz-rTMS) correlated significantly, but this correlation was also found for pre versus post sham stimulation.

Conclusion

The TMS-evoked N100 represents a promising candidate marker to monitor rTMS effects on cortical excitability in children with ADHD. TMS-evoked N100 can be employed to monitor real-time effects of TMS for subthreshold intensities. Though TMS-evoked N100 was a more sensitive parameter for rTMS-specific changes than MEPs in our sample, further studies are necessary to demonstrate whether clinical rTMS effects can be predicted from rTMS-induced changes in TMS-evoked N100 amplitude and to clarify the relationship between rTMS-induced changes in TMS-evoked N100 and MEP amplitudes. The TMS-evoked N100 amplitude reduction after 1 Hz-rTMS could either reflect a globally decreased cortical response to the TMS pulse or a specific decrease in inhibition.     

Modulation of learning and hippocampal, neuronal plasticity by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

The influence of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on learning process in mice and on neuronal excitability of the hippocampal tissue obtained from stimulated animals were investigated. While the stimulation with rTMS at higher frequency (15 Hz) improved animals' performance in novel object recognition test (NOR), lower frequency (1 and 8 Hz) impaired the memory. The effect was observed when evaluated immediately after rTMS exposure and declined with time. In parallel to the results of behavioral test, there was a significant enhancement of the synaptic efficiency expressed as of the long-term potentiation (LTP) recorded from hippocampal slices prepared from the animals exposed to 15 Hz rTMS. The stimulation with 1 and 8 Hz had no influence on the magnitude of LTP. Our results demonstrate that rTMS modifies mechanisms involved in memory formation. The effects of rTMS in vivo are preserved and expressed in the hippocampus tested in vitro.     

经颅磁刺激对癫痫病灶脑电相关维数的影响

利用脑功能指标——大鼠病灶区脑电的相关维数,研究低频经颅磁刺激对慢性颞叶癫痫大鼠脑功能改善的作用。对一组颞叶癫痫大鼠施予频率为0．5Hz、强度为0．4T、20次／日、连续一周的低频重复性经颅磁刺激(rTMS)．在rTMS前后,分别测取颞叶癫痫大鼠责任病灶区皮层和海马区的脑电,重构时间延迟吸引子,用G-P算法估算反映对应脑区功能状态的相关维数。研究结果显示：施予适量的rTMS(0.4T、20次／日、连续一周),使颞叶癫痫大鼠海马和相应皮层脑电的相关维数比刺激前明显升高。研究表明适量的rTMS有抑制癫痫的作用。     

重复经颅磁刺激对卒中后抑郁的治疗效果及机制

卒中后抑郁（post-stroke depression,PSD）是并发于脑血管病的一种情感障碍疾病，发病率高，预后差。重复经颅磁刺激（repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation,r TMS）是通过磁场变化在大脑中产生感应电流来刺激皮层的非创伤性脑刺激技术，是临床上治疗PSD的一种重要非药物治疗方法，可以显著改善PSD患者的抑郁症状。但目前rTMS的作用机制不明确。本文总结了PSD治疗中有效的rTMS刺激方案，并结合PSD的单胺类神经递质相关致病假说及PSD的临床治疗手段，探索了rTMS通过对单胺类神经递质的调控参与PSD治疗的可能机制。rTMS刺激诱导的皮层单胺类递质释放增加、葡萄糖代谢上升、皮层兴奋性增加，提高了单胺类神经递质和脑源性神经营养因子（brain-derived neurotrophic factor,BDNF）水平，进而引发前额叶抑制功能上升、与下游脑区连接改变、脑网络功能的调整，可能是rTMS治疗PSD的重要机制之一。     

重复经颅磁刺激对慢性精神分裂症患者认知功能影响的初步研究

目的:探讨重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对慢性精神分裂症患者认知功能的影响。方法:100例慢性精神分裂症患者,按照随机数字表法分为rTMS真刺激组和伪刺激组,每组各50例。采用阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)及副反应量表(TESS)评估患者治疗前后精神症状及不良反应;采用威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)及可重复的成套神经心理状态测量(RBANS)评价患者治疗前后认知功能。结果:治疗后,rTMS真刺激组PANSS总分、阳性量表分、阴性量表分、一般精神病理量表分均明显降低(P0.05),且均明显低于伪刺激组(P0.05),两组治疗前后及组间TESS评分无明显差异(P0.05);rTMS真刺激组WCST中的概念化水平百分数明显高于伪刺激组(P0.05),总时间及错误思考时间短于伪刺激组(P0.05);rTMS真刺激组RBANS中视觉广度与延迟记忆成绩明显提高(P0.05),且视觉广度明显高于伪刺激组(P0.05);rTMS真刺激组2例患者首次治疗后出现轻度不适症状,随访3个月所有患者均无不适主诉。结论:rTMS治疗对慢性精神分裂症患者的部分认知功能有一定的改善作用,且安全性较高,值得进一步研究。     

Transcranial magnetic stimulation intensities in cognitive paradigms

Background

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has become an important experimental tool for exploring the brain''s functional anatomy. As TMS interferes with neural activity, the hypothetical function of the stimulated area can thus be tested. One unresolved methodological issue in TMS experiments is the question of how to adequately calibrate stimulation intensities. The motor threshold (MT) is often taken as a reference for individually adapted stimulation intensities in TMS experiments, even if they do not involve the motor system. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether it is reasonable to adjust stimulation intensities in each subject to the individual MT if prefrontal regions are stimulated prior to the performance of a cognitive paradigm.

Methods and Findings

Repetitive TMS (rTMS) was applied prior to a working memory task, either at the ‘fixed’ intensity of 40% maximum stimulator output (MSO), or individually adapted at 90% of the subject''s MT. Stimulation was applied to a target region in the left posterior middle frontal gyrus (pMFG), as indicated by a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) localizer acquired beforehand, or to a control site (vertex). Results show that MT predicted the effect size after stimulating subjects with the fixed intensity (i.e., subjects with a low MT showed a greater behavioral effect). Nevertheless, the individual adaptation of intensities did not lead to stable effects.

Conclusion

Therefore, we suggest assessing MT and account for it as a measure for general cortical TMS susceptibility, even if TMS is applied outside the motor domain.     

Modulation of monoamine transporter expression and function by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a new tool for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. However, the mechanisms underlying the effects of rTMS are still unclear. In this study, we analyzed mRNA expression changes of monoamine transporter (MAT) genes, which are targets for antidepressants and psychostimulants. Following a 20-day rTMS treatment, these genes were found to be differentially expressed in the mouse brain. Down-regulation of serotonin transporter (SERT) mRNA levels and the subsequent decrease in serotonin uptake and binding were observed after chronic rTMS. In contrast to the SERT changes, increased mRNA levels of dopamine transporter (DAT) and norepinephrine transporter (NET) were observed. For NET, but not DAT, there were accompanying changes in uptake and binding. Similar effect on NET was observed in PC12 cells stimulated by rTMS for 15 days. These results indicate that modulation of MATs by chronic rTMS may be one therapeutic mechanism for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders.     

Calcium dependent plasticity applied to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with a neural field model

The calcium dependent plasticity (CaDP) approach to the modeling of synaptic weight change is applied using a neural field approach to realistic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols. A spatially-symmetric nonlinear neural field model consisting of populations of excitatory and inhibitory neurons is used. The plasticity between excitatory cell populations is then evaluated using a CaDP approach that incorporates metaplasticity. The direction and size of the plasticity (potentiation or depression) depends on both the amplitude of stimulation and duration of the protocol. The breaks in the inhibitory theta-burst stimulation protocol are crucial to ensuring that the stimulation bursts are potentiating in nature. Tuning the parameters of a spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) window with a Monte Carlo approach to maximize agreement between STDP predictions and the CaDP results reproduces a realistically-shaped window with two regions of depression in agreement with the existing literature. Developing understanding of how TMS interacts with cells at a network level may be important for future investigation.     

Sleep deprivation in depression stabilizing antidepressant effects by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Partial sleep deprivation (PSD) has a profound and rapid effect on depressed mood. However, the transient antidepressant effect of PSD - most patients relapse after one night of recovery sleep - is limiting the clinical use of this method. Using a controlled, balanced parallel design we studied, whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied in the morning after PSD is able to prevent this relapse. 20 PSD responders were randomly assigned to receive either active or sham stimulation during the following 4 days after PSD. Active stimulation prolonged significantly (p < 0.001) the antidepressant effect of PSD up to 4 days. This finding indicates that rTMS is an efficacious method to prevent relapse after PSD.     

SNAIL NEURON BIOELECTRIC ACTIVITY INDUCED UNDER STATIC OR SINUSOIDAL MAGNETIC FIELDS REPRODUCES MAMMAL NEURON RESPONSES UNDER TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION

We have applied static (SMF) or alternating magnetic fields (AMF) to snail (Helix aspersa) single-unit neurons, in the range of those applied in magnetic stimulation (MS)/transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). From the experiments we have performed during the past 10 years, we have collected a blind selection of neurons and their responses to either SMF or AMF. Blind selection means that we do not know the nature of neurons. We do not know whether they are sensitive, motor, secretory, pacemaker, or inter-neurons. We have seen that the behavior of single-unit neurons under SMF/AMF exposure (SMF range: 3 mT–0.7 T; AMF range: 1–15 mT) fits well with the electrophysiologic activity described for mammals and human whole brain under MS/TMS (pulsed magnetic field range: 0.3 mT–2.4 T). The neuron experiments shown here have been aleatorily selected from a collection of about 200 neurons studied. Our results could explain some of the effects described induced in mammal neurons under MS/TMS for clinical purposes.     

经颅磁刺激参数与结构要件的影响分析

为了进一步探索经颅磁刺激工作机理并改进或研制出新的经颅磁刺激激励源.本文从经颅磁刺激的原理推导出了磁场、感应电流及激励源原理电路电流的表达式,利用大脑-线圈和大脑-线圈-铁芯两种经颅磁刺激模型分析影响因素与头模型各组织的磁场和感应电流分布.对比分析表明电流的性质,线圈半径,线圈激励特性与铁芯对感应电流分布与电磁场分布有着本质的影响.对经颅磁刺激参数及结构要件的研究与分析可用于指导刺激线圈参数及激励源电路参数的设置,以及探索新的激励源制作.     

rTMS of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Dopamine Release in the Ipsilateral Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Orbitofrontal Cortex

Background

Brain dopamine is implicated in the regulation of movement, attention, reward and learning and plays an important role in Parkinson''s disease, schizophrenia and drug addiction. Animal experiments have demonstrated that brain stimulation is able to induce significant dopaminergic changes in extrastriatal areas. Given the up-growing interest of non-invasive brain stimulation as potential tool for treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders, it would be critical to investigate dopaminergic functional interactions in the prefrontal cortex and more in particular the effect of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (areas 9/46) stimulation on prefrontal dopamine (DA).

Methodology/Principal Findings

Healthy volunteers were studied with a high-affinity DA D2-receptor radioligand, [¹¹C]FLB 457-PET following 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the left and right DLPFC. rTMS on the left DLPFC induced a significant reduction in [¹¹C]FLB 457 binding potential (BP) in the ipsilateral subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) (BA 25/12), pregenual ACC (BA 32) and medial orbitofrontal cortex (BA 11). There were no significant changes in [¹¹C]FLB 457 BP following right DLPFC rTMS.

Conclusions/Significance

To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide evidence of extrastriatal DA modulation following acute rTMS of DLPFC with its effect limited to the specific areas of medial prefrontal cortex. [¹¹C]FLB 457-PET combined with rTMS may allow to explore the neurochemical functions of specific cortical neural networks and help to identify the neurobiological effects of TMS for the treatment of different neurological and psychiatric diseases.