重离子辐照酿酒酵母DNA损伤修复途径研究进展

重离子辐照通过直接和间接作用导致生物体DNA产生损伤,包括DNA的链断裂、碱基的插入或丢失以及氧化损伤等.DNA损伤直接影响复制、转录和蛋白质合成,同时还是突变的重要原因,因此,DNA损伤修复系统尤为重要.在酿酒酵母中,这些损伤主要是通过同源重组修复(homologous recombination repair,HRR)、碱基错配修复(mismatch repair,MMR)和碱基切除修复(base excision repair,BER)等途径来修复的.作为真核生物研究的模式生物,对于酿酒酵母DNA损伤修复的HRR、MMR和BER途径研究颇多,也不断有一些新的成果出现,特别是对于相关途径的完善和相关蛋白的深化更是研究热点,在此对近年来有关重离子辐照酿酒酵母DNA损伤修复途径方面的研究做一综述.     

碱基切除修复在阿尔茨海默病和帕金森病中的作用

细胞代谢或细胞应激均可以引起DNA氧化损伤。DNA氧化损伤与神经退行性疾病的发生、发展密切相关。碱基切除修复在抵抗脑细胞DNA氧化损伤中起着重要的作用。就碱基切除修复在阿尔茨海默病(Alzheimer’s disease,AD)和帕金森病(Parkinson’s disease,PD)中的作用及其机制进行综述。     

碱基切除修复与分枝杆菌基因组稳定性

维持基因组稳定是生物生存的基础。碱基切除修复(base excision repair,BER)是修复损伤DNA、维持基因组稳定的主要方式之一。碱基切除修复对结核分枝杆菌等胞内致病菌尤其重要。fpg编码碱基切除修复的关键酶。本文通过比较分枝杆菌的基因组,发现结核菌较其他非致病分枝杆菌具有更多的碱基切除修复基因。这提示碱基切除修复可能对结核菌在宿主体内存活和致病至关重要。这条途径也许是新结核病药物研发的重要靶标。     

利用串联亲和纯化的方法筛选耻垢分枝杆菌中MutM的相互作用蛋白

Mut M(formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase,Fpg)是原核生物碱基切除修复系统(BER)中同时具有DNA糖苷酶和脱嘌呤/脱嘧啶AP裂解酶活性的一种双功能酶,不但可以识别DNA损伤,而且能切除损伤的碱基,从而参与到许多种损伤的修复过程.除了高致突变率的8-羟基鸟嘌呤(8-oxoguanine,8-oxo G)外,Mut M在其他损伤修复中具体作用机制还不清楚.本研究主要以耻垢分枝杆菌(M.smegmatis)为研究对象,利用串联亲和纯化技术和质谱相结合的方法对可能与Mut M相互作用的蛋白因子进行发现和鉴定,并于体外用Far-western和GST pull-down方法对鉴定出的蛋白DEAD-box rna helicase、Rps C、Uvr A与Mut M的相互作用进行了验证.实验结果表明,利用串联亲和纯化方法来发现Mut M相互作用的蛋白是切实可行的.本研究为进一步深入研究Mut M在其参与的损伤修复中的具体机制提供了切入点.     

DNA氧化损伤8-羟鸟嘌呤与肿瘤的发生发展

有氧代谢有机体细胞无法避免活性氧(reactive oxygen species, ROS)的伤害。ROS会造成多种形式的DNA损伤,其中鸟嘌呤G的氧化产物8-羟鸟嘌呤(8-oxoG)是频度最高的一种DNA氧化损伤,由特异性的糖苷酶OGG1识别并开启碱基切除修复通路完成修复。8-oxoG如果没有及时修复,可能会在复制的过程中引入G:C配对到T:A配对的碱基颠换突变。因此8-oxoG的积累或OGG1修复功能异常被认为会影响基因功能,进而导致肿瘤或衰老相关疾病的发生,然而直接实验证据却极为有限。近年来一系列研究表明,8-oxoG倾向于产生在基因的调控区,在这种情形下,8-oxoG可视为一种表观遗传学修饰,而OGG1则是这一信息的特异性读取者,OGG1对底物的识别、结合或切除会引发DNA构象或组蛋白修饰的改变,进而引起基因表达的上调或下调。因此,除了潜在的遗传毒性,鸟嘌呤氧化损伤与肿瘤的关联与其通过表观遗传学机制引发基因表达的异常密切相关。本文对8-oxoG及修复酶OGG1与肿瘤发生发展的关联机制进行了分析与总结,旨在提示研究人员从新的视角解读DNA氧化损伤与肿瘤的关系,并为肿瘤的治疗提供新...     

碱基编辑系统研究最新进展及应用

CRISPR系统能够在基因组DNA中完成精准编辑,但依赖于细胞内的同源重组(Homology directed recombination,HDR)修复途径,且效率极低.基于CRISPR/Cas9系统开发的碱基编辑技术(Base editing)通过将失去切割活性的核酸酶与不同碱基脱氨基酶融合,构建了两套碱基编辑系统(...     

BE3型胞嘧啶碱基编辑器在谷氨酸棒杆菌中的开发及应用

碱基编辑技术结合了CRISPR/Cas系统的靶向特异性与碱基脱氨酶的催化活性,因其不产生双链DNA断裂、不需要外源DNA模板、不依赖同源重组修复,自开发以来,便受到研究者的追捧,在哺乳动物细胞、植物、微生物等领域相继得到开发与应用。为了进一步丰富碱基编辑系统在谷氨酸棒杆菌中的应用,将鼠源胞嘧啶脱氨酶(rAPOBEC1)与nCas9蛋白融合,实现了在谷氨酸棒杆菌中C到T的编辑,编辑比例较低(0-20%);在上述融合蛋白C端添加UGI蛋白,构建BE3型胞嘧啶碱基编辑器,抑制体内的DNA碱基切除修复机制,显著的提高了碱基编辑效率,使得C到T的碱基编辑效率高达90%;为了简化操作,将双质粒碱基编辑系统优化为单质粒碱基编辑系统,并显著提高转化效率;最后通过单质粒碱基编辑系统对基因组中其他位点的编辑测试,进一步证明了BE3型碱基编辑器在谷氨酸棒杆菌中的高效性,同时发现该碱基编辑器具有较宽的编辑窗口(PAM上游-11到-19位),有助于覆盖更多的基因组靶标位点,为谷氨酸棒杆菌的基因组改造提供了更多的工具选择。     

DNA连接酶同工酶的研究进展

DNA连接酶是生物体内重要的酶,其所催化的反应在DNA的复制和修复过程中起重要作用. DNA连接酶分为两大类：一类是利用ATP的能量催化两个核苷酸链之间形成磷酸二酯键的依赖ATP的DNA连接酶,另一类是利用NAD⁺的能量催化两个核苷酸链之间形成磷酸二酯键的依赖NAD^＋的DNA连接酶.研究发现,细菌的DNA连接酶都是依赖NAD^＋的, 且有非常相似的序列和相近的分子质量,其酶分子分为两个功能区：N端区与NAD^＋结合形成酶-腺苷酸中间物;C端区催化两条DNA链的连接.所有真核生物的DNA连接酶都是利用ATP提供能量,且一种真核生物含有多种DNA连接酶,不同的DNA连接酶催化不同的DNA修复和复制过程：DNA连接酶Ⅰ的作用是将岗畸片段连接起来形成完整的DNA链以及进行碱基切除修复(BER);DNA连接酶Ⅲ主要是在DNA修复中起作用,即催化单核苷酸碱基切除修复.DNA连接酶Ⅱ可能是DNA连接酶Ⅲ的一个片段.     

RNA聚合酶监视的DNA修复机制

生物体在正常生命过程中面临内/外因来源的DNA损伤,DNA损伤不仅影响基因正确复制,也阻碍其正常转录.为避免DNA损伤带来的灾难性后果,生物体进化出一整套修复机制,以保证复制和转录的正确性、基因组的完整性和遗传的稳定性.本文重点综述了RNA聚合酶监视(RNA polymerase-surveilled,RNAP-S)的DNA修复机制.首先从RNA聚合酶(RNA polymerase,RNAP)的结构出发介绍了RNAP对DNA损伤的感知机制;其次讨论了滞留RNAP的回溯、与其模板DNA的解离以及后续修复机制的启动,真核细胞科凯恩综合征B蛋白(Cockayne syndrome protein B,CSB)及其泛素化和8-氧代鸟嘌呤DNA糖基化酶1 (8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase1,OGG1)介导的RNAP-S修复;最后探讨了RNAP-S损伤修复的生物学意义并展望其前景.     

基因定位修复技术——嵌合修复术（chimeraplasty）

传统的以病毒DNA为载体的基因治疗方法存在病毒导入的靶向性差、整合位点的特异性差、基因剂量的可控性差以及病毒载体具有一定的免疫原性的缺点,而实际上许多单基因遗传病只要将突变的单个碱基校正就能达到基因治疗的目的,不必置换或整合入整个基因.嵌合修复术(chimerplasty)是近年来迅速发展起来的一种基因定位修复技术,该技术利用RNA/DNA嵌合体分子与要修复的宿主染色体DNA碱基序列互补而精确定位并原位修复,也可用于人工定点突变,已在单基因遗传病的基因治疗及植物遗传改良等方面获得了成功的应用.介绍了该技术的原理、应用举例及前景.     

极端嗜热古菌尿嘧啶DNA糖苷酶的研究进展

高温会加快碱基脱氨基反应形成损伤碱基的速率,进一步对脱氨基的碱基进行复制会导致突变。因此,极端嗜热古菌基因组的稳定性面临着其生存高温环境的挑战。胞嘧啶脱氨基形成尿嘧啶,是常见的脱碱基类型,复制DNA中尿嘧啶会造成GC→AT的突变。尿嘧啶DNA糖苷酶(Uracil DNA glycosylase,UDG)是修复DNA中尿嘧啶的关键酶。基于识别底物的特异性,UDG分为6个家族,广泛分布在细菌、古菌、真核生物以及一些病毒中。基因组序列显示,极端嗜热古菌至少编码一种UDG。目前,对于细菌和真核生物的UDG已进行了大量的研究,但是关于极端嗜热古菌UDG的研究相对较少,尚处于初期阶段。本文综述了极端嗜热古菌UDG的研究进展,并对今后的研究提出了展望。     

8-Oxoguanine DNA damage: at the crossroad of alternative repair pathways

Radical oxygen species (ROS) generate various modified DNA bases. Among them 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8oxoG) is the most abundant and seems to play a major role in mutagenesis and in carcinogenesis. 8oxoG is removed from DNA by the specific glycosylase OGG1. An additional post-replication repair is needed to correct the 8oxoG/A mismatches that are produced by persistent 8oxoG residues. This review is focused on the mechanisms of base excision repair (BER) of this oxidized base. It is shown that, in vitro, efficient and complete repair of 8oxoG/C pairs requires a core of four proteins, namely OGG1, APE1, DNA polymerase (Pol) beta, and DNA ligase I. Repair occurs predominantly by one nucleotide replacement reactions (short-patch BER) and Pol beta is the polymerase of election for the resynthesis step. However, alternative mechanisms can act on 8oxoG residues since Pol beta-null cells are able to repair these lesions. 8oxoG/A mismatches are repaired by human cell extracts via two BER events which occur sequentially on the two strands. The removal of the mismatched adenine is followed by preferential insertion of a cytosine leading to the formation of 8oxoG/C pairs which are then corrected by OGG1-mediated BER. Both repair events are inhibited by aphidicolin, suggesting that a replicative DNA polymerase is involved in the repair synthesis step. We propose that Pol delta/epsilon-mediated BER (long-patch BER) is the mode of repair when lesions persist or are formed at replication. Finally, we address the issues of the relative contribution of the two BER pathways to oxidative damage repair in vivo and the possible role of BER gene variants as cancer susceptibility genes.     

The type of DNA glycosylase determines the base excision repair pathway in mammalian cells.

The base excision repair (BER) of modified nucleotides is initiated by damage-specific DNA glycosylases. The repair of the resulting apurinic/apyrimidinic site involves the replacement of either a single nucleotide (short patch BER) or of several nucleotides (long patch BER). The mechanism that controls the selection of either BER pathway is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that the type of base damage present on DNA, by determining the specific DNA glycosylase in charge of its excision, drives the repair of the resulting abasic site intermediate to either BER branch. In mammalian cells hypoxanthine (HX) and 1,N6-ethenoadenine (epsilonA) are both substrates for the monofunctional 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase, the ANPG protein, whereas 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) is removed by the bifunctional DNA glycosylase/beta-lyase 8-oxoG-DNA gly- cosylase (OGG1). Circular plasmid molecules containing a single HX, epsilonA, or 8-oxoG were constructed. In vitro repair assays with HeLa cell extracts revealed that HX and epsilonA are repaired via both short and long patch BER, whereas 8-oxoG is repaired mainly via the short patch pathway. The preferential repair of 8-oxoG by short patch BER was confirmed by the low efficiency of repair of this lesion by DNA polymerase beta-deficient mouse cells as compared with their wild-type counterpart. These data fit into a model where the intrinsic properties of the DNA glycosylase that recognizes the lesion selects the branch of BER that will restore the intact DNA template.     

Arabidopsis ZDP DNA 3′‐phosphatase and ARP endonuclease function in 8‐oxoG repair initiated by FPG and OGG1 DNA glycosylases

Oxidation of guanine in DNA generates 7,8‐dihydro‐8‐oxoguanine (8‐oxoG), an ubiquitous lesion with mutagenic properties. 8‐oxoG is primarily removed by DNA glycosylases distributed in two families, typified by bacterial Fpg proteins and eukaryotic Ogg1 proteins. Interestingly, plants possess both Fpg and Ogg1 homologs but their relative contributions to 8‐oxoG repair remain uncertain. In this work we used Arabidopsis cell‐free extracts to monitor 8‐oxoG repair in wild‐type and mutant plants. We found that both FPG and OGG1 catalyze excision of 8‐oxoG in Arabidopsis cell extracts by a DNA glycosylase/lyase mechanism, and generate repair intermediates with blocked 3′‐termini. An increase in oxidative damage is detected in both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA from double fpg ogg1 mutants, but not in single mutants, which suggests that a single deficiency in one of these DNA glycosylases may be compensated by the other. We also found that the DNA 3′‐phosphatase ZDP (zinc finger DNA 3′‐phosphoesterase) and the AP(apurinic/apyirmidinic) endonuclease ARP(apurinic endonuclease redox protein) are required in the 8‐oxoG repair pathway to process the 3′‐blocking ends generated by FPG and OGG1. Furthermore, deficiencies in ZDP and/or ARP decrease germination ability after seed deteriorating conditions. Altogether, our results suggest that Arabidopsis cells use both FPG and OGG1 to repair 8‐oxoG in a pathway that requires ZDP and ARP in downstream steps.     

The high binding affinity of human ribosomal protein S3 to 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine is abrogated by a single amino acid change

Previous studies have shown that human ribosomal protein S3 (hS3) has a high apparent binding affinity for 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) residues in DNA and interacts with the human base excision repair (BER) proteins OGG1 and APE/Ref-1. We used a combination of computational and experimental approaches to understand the role of hS3 in BER and its potential to hinder repair of 8-oxoG lesions by OGG1 and APE/Ref-1. Sequence analysis was employed to identify hS3 residues likely to be involved in binding to 8-oxoG. One putative site, lysine 132 (K132), located in a helix-hairpin-helix DNA binding motif, was mutated to alanine (K132A). The hS3-K132A mutant retained the ability to cleave abasic DNA, but its capacity to bind 8-oxoG was abrogated completely. The ability of OGG1 to cleave an 8-oxoG-oligonucleotide substrate pre-incubated with hS3 or hS3-K132A was also tested. Pre-incubations with wild-type hS3 and 8-oxoG-containing oligonucleotides completely prevented the subsequent removal of 8-oxoG by OGG1. On the other hand, OGG1 incubations combined with hS3-K132A stimulated cleavage of 8-oxoG in excess of two-fold, confirming previous observations that hS3 positively interacts with OGG1, but only under conditions in which the binding of hS3 to 8-oxoG is limited. Overall, the ability of OGG1 to repair 8-oxoG is compromised when hS3 is bound to 8-oxoG sites. Conversely, in the absence of DNA binding, hS3 interacts positively with OGG1 to produce a more robust removal of 8-oxoG residues in DNA.     

8-Oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1-mediated DNA repair is associated with Rho GTPase activation and α-smooth muscle actin polymerization

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are activators of cell signaling and modify cellular molecules, including DNA. 8-Oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG) is one of the prominent lesions in oxidatively damaged DNA, whose accumulation is causally linked to various diseases and aging processes, whereas its etiological relevance is unclear. 8-OxoG is repaired by the 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1 (OGG1)-initiated DNA base excision repair (BER) pathway. OGG1 binds free 8-oxoG and this complex functions as an activator of Ras family GTPases. Here we examined whether OGG1-initiated BER is associated with the activation of Rho GTPase and mediates changes in the cytoskeleton. To test this possibility, we induced OGG1-initiated BER in cultured cells and mouse lungs and used molecular approaches such as active Rho pull-down assays, siRNA ablation of gene expression, immune blotting, and microscopic imaging. We found that OGG1 physically interacts with Rho GTPase and, in the presence of 8-oxoG base, increases Rho–GTP levels in cultured cells and lungs, which mediates α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) polymerization into stress fibers and increases the level of α-SMA in insoluble cellular/tissue fractions. These changes were absent in cells lacking OGG1. These unexpected data and those showing that 8-oxoG repair is a lifetime process suggest that, via Rho GTPase, OGG1 could be involved in the cytoskeletal changes and organ remodeling observed in various chronic diseases.     

A DNA glycosylase from Pyrobaculum aerophilum with an 8-oxoguanine binding mode and a noncanonical helix-hairpin-helix structure

Studies of DNA base excision repair (BER) pathways in the hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon Pyrobaculum aerophilum identified an 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase, Pa-AGOG (archaeal GO glycosylase), with distinct functional characteristics. Here, we describe its crystal structure and that of its complex with 8-oxoguanosine at 1.0 and 1.7 A resolution, respectively. Characteristic structural features are identified that confirm Pa-AGOG to be the founding member of a functional class within the helix-hairpin-helix (HhH) superfamily of DNA repair enzymes. Its hairpin structure differs substantially from that of other proteins containing an HhH motif, and we predict that it interacts with the DNA backbone in a distinct manner. Furthermore, the mode of 8-oxoguanine recognition, which involves several hydrogen-bonding and pi-stacking interactions, is unlike that observed in human OGG1, the prototypic 8-oxoguanine HhH-type DNA glycosylase. Despite these differences, the predicted kinked conformation of bound DNA and the catalytic mechanism are likely to resemble those of human OGG1.     

Activation of cellular signaling by 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1-initiated DNA base excision repair

Accumulation of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG) in the DNA results in genetic instability and mutagenesis, and is believed to contribute to carcinogenesis, aging processes and various aging-related diseases. 8-OxoG is removed from the DNA via DNA base excision repair (BER), initiated by 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1 (OGG1). Our recent studies have shown that OGG1 binds its repair product 8-oxoG base with high affinity at a site independent from its DNA lesion-recognizing catalytic site and the OGG1•8-oxoG complex physically interacts with canonical Ras family members. Furthermore, exogenously added 8-oxoG base enters the cells and activates Ras GTPases; however, a link has not yet been established between cell signaling and DNA BER, which is the endogenous source of the 8-oxoG base. In this study, we utilized KG-1 cells expressing a temperature-sensitive mutant OGG1, siRNA ablation of gene expression, and a variety of molecular biological assays to define a link between OGG1-BER and cellular signaling. The results show that due to activation of OGG1-BER, 8-oxoG base is released from the genome in sufficient quantities for activation of Ras GTPase and resulting in phosphorylation of the downstream Ras targets Raf1, MEK1,2 and ERK1,2. These results demonstrate a previously unrecognized mechanism for cellular responses to OGG1-initiated DNA BER.     

Clostridium acetobutylicum 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (Ogg) differs from eukaryotic Oggs with respect to opposite base discrimination

During repair of damaged DNA, the oxidized base 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) is removed by 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase (Ogg) in eukaryotes and most archaea, whereas in most bacteria it is removed by formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg). We report the first characterization of a bacterial Ogg, Clostridium acetobutylicum Ogg (CacOgg). Like human OGG1 and Escherichia coli Fpg (EcoFpg), CacOgg excised 8-oxoguanine. However, unlike hOGG1 and EcoFpg, CacOgg showed little preference for the base opposite the damage during base excision and removed 8-oxoguanine from single-stranded DNA. Thus, our results showed unambiguous qualitative functional differences in vitro between CacOgg and both hOGG1 and EcoFpg. CacOgg differs in sequence from the eukaryotic enzymes at two sequence positions, M132 and F179, which align with amino acids (R154 and Y203) in human OGG1 (hOGG1) found to be involved in opposite base interaction. To address the sequence basis for functional differences with respect to opposite base interactions, we prepared three CacOgg variants, M132R, F179Y, and M132R/F179Y. All three variants showed a substantial increase in specificity for 8-oxoG.C relative to 8-oxoG.A. While we were unable to definitively associate these qualitative functional differences with differences in selective pressure between eukaryotes, Clostridia, and other bacteria, our results are consistent with the idea that evolution of Ogg function is based on kinetic control of repair.