Regulatory networks that function to specify flower meristems require the function of homeobox genes PENNYWISE and POUND-FOOLISH in Arabidopsis

Flowering is a major developmental phase change that transforms the fate of the shoot apical meristem (SAM) from a leaf-bearing vegetative meristem to that of a flower-producing inflorescence meristem. In Arabidopsis, floral meristems are specified on the periphery of the inflorescence meristem by the combined activities of the FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)–FD complex and the flower meristem identity gene, LEAFY ( LFY ). Two redundant functioning homeobox genes, PENNYWISE ( PNY ) and POUND-FOOLISH ( PNF ), which are expressed in the vegetative and inflorescence SAM, regulate patterning events during reproductive development, including floral specification. To determine the role of PNY and PNF in the floral specification network, we characterized the genetic relationship of these homeobox genes with LFY and FT . Results from this study demonstrate that LFY functions downstream of PNY and PNF. Ectopic expression of LFY promotes flower formation in pny pnf plants, while the flower specification activity of ectopic FT is severely attenuated. Genetic analysis shows that when mutations in pny and pnf genes are combined with lfy , a synergistic phenotype is displayed that significantly reduces floral specification and alters inflorescence patterning events. In conclusion, results from this study support a model in which PNY and PNF promote LFY expression during reproductive development. At the same time, the flower formation activity of FT is dependent upon the function of PNY and PNF.     

A floret by any other name: control of meristem identity in maize

The life of a plant unfolds as a series of developmental stages, with each stage defined by changes in meristem identity. In maize, there are several distinct stages: the transition from vegetative growth to flowering, the elaboration of the inflorescence, and the formation of flowers. Progress in understanding meristem identity and function has been made by analyzing maize mutants with defects at each of these stages. Recently cloned genes suggest that, although the molecular mechanisms controlling floral organ identity are conserved in maize and other model species, the control of meristem identity during earlier developmental stages might be less conserved.     

芸薹属植物发育过程中顶端结构的解剖学研究

本文采用解剖学方法研究花椰菜、青花菜、结球甘蓝和大白菜在生长发育过程中顶端分生组织结构的变化及之间存在的差异。结果显示它们的顶端分生组织结构都是由最初幼苗的原套-原体结构逐渐发育到过渡型分区结构、典型化五个分区结构,至开始进入生殖生长时期的四个分区结构(形成层状细胞区消失)。四种植物在进入生殖生长后,顶端分生组织细胞行为不同:大白菜和甘蓝顶端亚外套两侧细胞分裂分化形成顶生叶原基,在顶生叶原基内侧的细胞将进行分裂产生花序侧枝原基。花椰菜和青花菜顶端亚外套两侧细胞分裂形成花序分生组织,花序分生组织增生即为花球体;内部解剖结构表现为分生组织不断分裂增多的过程。这些结果为研究花序表型发生的解剖学本质及分子生物学研究分生组织发育方向奠定了基础。     

Genetic Interactions That Regulate Inflorescence Development in Arabidopsis

In Arabidopsis, floral meristems arise in continuous succession directly on the flanks of the inflorescence meristem. Thus, the pathways that regulate inflorescence and floral meristem identity must operate both simultaneously and in close spatial proximity. The TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) gene of Arabidopsis is required for normal inflorescence meristem function, and the LEAFY (LFY), APETALA 1 (AP1), and APETALA 2 (AP2) genes are required for normal floral meristem function. We present evidence that inflorescence meristem identity is promoted by TFL1 and that floral meristem identity is promoted by parallel developmental pathways, one defined by LFY and the other defined by AP1/AP2. Our analysis suggests that the acquisition of meristem identity during inflorescence development is mediated by antagonistic interactions between TFL1 and LFY and between TFL1 and AP1/AP2. Based on this study, we propose a simple model for the genetic regulation of inflorescence development in Arabidopsis. This model is discussed in relation to the proposed interactions between the inflorescence and the floral meristem identity genes and in regard to other genes that are likely to be part of the genetic hierarchy regulating the establishment and maintenance of inflorescence and floral meristems.     

An exploration of LEAFY expression in independent evolutionary origins of rosette flowering in Brassicaceae

Whereas most Brassicaceae produce flowers on an elongated inflorescence, a few lineages produce flowers directly from the vegetative rosette on elongated pedicels. Knowing the extent to which independent origins of rosette flowering involve the same developmental and genetic mechanisms could clarify the constraints acting on plant architectural evolution. Prior work in Idahoa, Ionopsidium, and Leavenworthia suggested that changes in the activity or expression of the flower meristem identity gene, LEAFY (LFY), played a role in all three origins of rosette flowering. Here we studied the developmental morphology of L. crassa and immunolocalization of LFY protein in Leavenworthia and Ionopsidium to further compare independent origins of rosette flowering. Leavenworthia crassa differs from Ionopsidium and Idahoa in producing ebracteate flowers. Flowers are, however, associated with "squamules," here interpreted as stipules of a cryptic bract. LFY was detected in L. crassa flower primordia but not in inflorescence meristems. In contrast, the rosette flowering Io. acaule accumulated LFY protein in the inflorescence meristem, whereas its inflorescence-flowering close relative, Io. prolongoi, did not. Thus, although different cases of rosette flowering likely entailed modifications of the same meristem identity program, distinct developmental genetic mechanisms appear to be involved in each case.     

Genetic characterization and floral development of female sterile and stubby head, two aposporous mutants of pearl millet

 Apomixis has never been reported in natural populations of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.], although many wild relatives of pearl millet are obligate or facultative aposporous apomicts. Four-nucleate aposporous embryo sacs are formed from somatic cells of the nucellus that do not undergo meiosis. Two mutants of pearl millet, female sterile (fs) and stubby head, have two developmental characteristics in common: a significant reduction in head length compared with the wild-type and the formation of aposporous embryo sacs. Reproductive development in fs and stubby head mutants was examined in depth because of the potential for illuminating basic cellular or developmental factors that may function to alter embryo sac development. Genetic analysis of stubby head showed that this phenotype is conferred by genes at two loci linked in coupling within 29 cM. Crosses between fs and stubby head mutants showed that, despite the similarities in phenotypes, the mutations are at different loci. The mutants differ from wild-type in their inflorescence structure from the time of initiation of spikelet primordia through terminal differentiation of the ovule. Both mutations could be categorized as meristic, since a change in inflorescence branch or organ number was common and gynoecium development varied. We speculate that heterochronic development of the floral meristem and organ initiation/specification programs may be the underlying mechanism for phenotypic changes in these mutants throughout the floral phase. Received: 25 October 1996 / Accepted: 13 March 1997     

The making of a flower: control of floral meristem identity in IT>Arabidopsis/IT>

During the reproductive phase of a plant, shoot meristems follow one of two developmental programs to produce either flowers or vegetative shoots. The decision as to which meristems give rise to flowers, and when they do so, determines the general morphology of an inflorescence. Molecular and genetic research in Arabidopsis and other model species has identified several genes that control the identity that a meristem will adopt. These meristem identity genes are activated in response to developmental and environmental cues, and can be assigned to three basic categories: those required either to initiate or maintain the floral program in some meristems and those required to maintain the vegetative program in others.     

Regulation of extent of vegetative development of the maize shoot meristem

In maize plants ( Zea mays L.), the extent of vegetative development in the shoot is precisely regulated such that the apical meristem produces a predictable number of leaves before converting to tassel development. In previous experiments using shoot apex culture, we showed that the developmental program that limits vegetative development in maize is not intrinsic to the shoot apical meristem. Rather, the meristem receives information from elsewhere in the plant and responds by either continuing leaf initiation or becoming determined for determinate growth and forming an inflorescence, the tassel. Here we examine leaf primordia as potential sources for that information using shoot apex culture. Our results show that the presence of the four to six youngest leaf primordia on the shoot apex is sufficient to provide such information. The ability to reset shoot development by meristem culture also allows us to examine the basis for expression of a specific phenotype at a particular developmental stage. We found that the mutation hcf106 , which is typically expressed only during seedling stages, is not re-expressed when the shoot morphogically has regained a juvenile phase.     

barren inflorescence2 regulates axillary meristem development in the maize inflorescence

Organogenesis in plants is controlled by meristems. Shoot apical meristems form at the apex of the plant and produce leaf primordia on their flanks. Axillary meristems, which form in the axils of leaf primordia, give rise to branches and flowers and therefore play a critical role in plant architecture and reproduction. To understand how axillary meristems are initiated and maintained, we characterized the barren inflorescence2 mutant, which affects axillary meristems in the maize inflorescence. Scanning electron microscopy, histology and RNA in situ hybridization using knotted1 as a marker for meristematic tissue show that barren inflorescence2 mutants make fewer branches owing to a defect in branch meristem initiation. The construction of the double mutant between barren inflorescence2 and tasselsheath reveals that the function of barren inflorescence2 is specific to the formation of branch meristems rather than bract leaf primordia. Normal maize inflorescences sequentially produce three types of axillary meristem: branch meristem, spikelet meristem and floral meristem. Introgression of the barren inflorescence2 mutant into genetic backgrounds in which the phenotype was weaker illustrates additional roles of barren inflorescence2 in these axillary meristems. Branch, spikelet and floral meristems that form in these lines are defective, resulting in the production of fewer floral structures. Because the defects involve the number of organs produced at each stage of development, we conclude that barren inflorescence2 is required for maintenance of all types of axillary meristem in the inflorescence. This defect allows us to infer the sequence of events that takes place during maize inflorescence development. Furthermore, the defect in branch meristem formation provides insight into the role of knotted1 and barren inflorescence2 in axillary meristem initiation.     

Flowering and apical meristem growth dynamics

The shoot apical meristem generates stem, leaves, and lateralshoot meristems during the entire shoot ontogeny. Vegetativeleaves are generated by the meristem in the vegetative developmentalphase, while in the reproductive phase either bracts subtendinglateral flower primordia (or paraclades), or perianth and strictlyreproductive organs are formed. Meristem growth is fully characterizedby the principal growth rates, directions, volumetric, and arealgrowth rates. Growth modelling or sequential in vivo methodsof meristem observation complemented by growth quantificationallow the above growth variables to be estimated. Indirectly,growth is assessed by cell division rates and other cell cycleparameters. Temporal and spatial changes of growth and geometrytake place at the meristem during the transition from the vegetativeto the reproductive phase. During the vegetative phase, meristemgrowth is generally indeterminate. In the reproductive phaseit is almost always determinate, but the extent of determinacydepends on the inflorescence architecture. In the vegetativephase the central meristem zone is the slowest growing region.The transition from the vegetative to the reproductive phaseis accompanied by an increase in mitotic activity in this zone.The more determinate is the meristem growth, the stronger isthis mitotic activation. However, regardless of the extent ofthe activation, in angiosperms the tunica/corpus structure ofthe meristem is preserved and therefore the mitotic activityof germ line cells remains relatively low. In the case of thethoroughly studied model angiosperm plant Arabidopsis thaliana,it is important to recognize that the flower primordium developsin the axil of a rudimentary bract. Another important featureof growth of the inflorescence shoot apical meristem is theheterogeneity of the peripheral zone. Finally, the role of mechanicalfactors in growth and functioning of the meristem needs furtherinvestigation. Key words: Flower primordium, geometry, growth, inflorescence, shoot apical meristem, transition from vegetative to reproductive phase Received 4 October 2007; Revised 5 November 2007 Accepted 6 November 2007     

孟仁草的花序发育研究

在光学显微镜和扫描电镜下观察了禾本科(Poaceae)虎尾草属(Chloris Sw.)孟仁草(Chloris barbata Sw.)的花序发育过程,以寻找适于虎尾草群(Chloris group)分支分析的发育性状.结果发现了未见于成熟花序的23个发育性状.阐明盂仁草花序的本质是二级长侧枝包围平截的主轴构成指形花序.该类型花序仅见于单子叶植物和少数高度特化的双子叶植物.涉及花序分枝的分子遗传机制研究亟待开展.     

Determination of Arabidopsis floral meristem identity by AGAMOUS.

Determinate growth of floral meristems in Arabidopsis requires the function of the floral regulatory gene AGAMOUS (AG). Expression of AG mRNA in the central region of floral meristems relies on the partially overlapping functions of the LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1) genes, which promote initial floral meristem identity. Here, we provide evidence that AG function is required for the final definition of floral meristem identity and that constitutive AG function can promote, independent of LFY and AP1 functions, the determinate floral state in the center of reproductive meristems. Loss-of-function analysis showed that the indeterminate central region of the ag mutant floral meristem undergoes conversion to an inflorescence meristem when long-day-dependent flowering stimulus is removed. Furthermore, gain-of-function analysis demonstrated that ectopic AG function results in precocious flowering and the formation of terminal flowers at apices of both the primary inflorescence and axillary branches of transgenic Arabidopsis plants in which AG expression is under the control of the 35S promoter from cauliflower mosaic virus. Similar phenotypes were also observed in lfy ap1 double mutants carrying a 35S-AG transgene. Together, these results indicate that AG is a principal developmental switch that controls the transition of meristem activity from indeterminate to determinate.     

Reproductive meristem fates in Gerbera

Flowering plants go through several phases between regular stem growth and the actual production of flower parts. The stepwise conversion of vegetative into inflorescence and floral meristems is usually unidirectional, but under certain environmental or genetic conditions, meristems can revert to an earlier developmental identity. Vegetative meristems are typically indeterminate, producing organs continuously, whereas flower meristems are determinate, shutting down their growth after reproductive organs are initiated. Inflorescence meristems can show either pattern. Flower and inflorescence development have been investigated in Gerbera hybrida, an ornamental plant in the sunflower family, Asteraceae. Unlike the common model species used to study flower development, Gerbera inflorescences bear a fixed number of flowers, and the architecture of the flowers differ in that Gerbera ovaries are inferior (borne below the perianth). This architectural difference has been exploited to show that floral meristem determinacy and identity are spatially and genetically distinct in Gerbera, and we have shown that a single SEPALLATA-like MADS domain factor controls both flower and inflorescence meristem fate in the plant. Although these phenomena have not been directly observed in Arabidopsis, the integrative role of the SEPALLATA function in reproductive meristem development may be general for all flowering plants.     

INFLORESCENCE DEVELOPMENT IN BRASSICA CAMPESTRIS L.

Vegetative seedlings of the Ceres strain Brassica campestris L., a quantitative, long-day plant, were induced to flower by exposure to a 16-hr, long-day cycle. Cytohistological and cytohistochemical changes associated with inflorescence development were examined. Developing shoot apices were classified in vegetative, transitional, and reproductive stages. The vegetative apex possessed a biseriate tunica, central zone, peripheral zone and pith-rib meristem. The transitional stage at 48 hr was marked by an increase in size and by a stratification of the upper cell layers of the shoot apex with a concurrent decrease of apical cytohistochemical zonation. The reproductive stage was initiated at 58 hr by periclinal cell divisions in the 3rd and 4th cell layers of the flank region. Cytohistochemical zonation in the vegetative apical meristem was restored in the floral apex. An “intermediate developmental” phase was not observed between the vegetative and reproductive stage.