Effect of centrally administered apelin-13 on gastric emptying and gastrointestinal transit in mice

Apelin, as the endogenous ligand for the APJ, regulates many biological functions, including blood pressure, neuroendocrine, drinking behavior, food intake and colonic motility. The present study was designed to investigate the effect of central apelin-13 on gastric emptying and gastrointestinal transit in mice. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of apelin-13 (3 and 10 μg/mouse) decreased gastric emptying rate by 10.9% and 17.1%. This effect was significantly antagonized by the APJ receptor antagonist apelin-13(F13A) and the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone, respectively. However, intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of apelin-13 (10-100 μg/mouse) did not affect gastric emptying. Apelin-13 (0.3, 1 and 3 μg/mouse, i.c.v.) inhibited gastrointestinal transit by 16.8%, 23.4% and 19.2%. Apelin-13(F13A) and naloxone could also reverse this antitransit effect induced by apelin-13. Taken together, these results suggest that i.c.v. injected apelin-13 inhibits gastric emptying and gastrointestinal transit and it seems that APJ receptor and opioid receptor might be involved in these processes.     

Central apelin-13 inhibits food intake via the CRF receptor in mice

Apelin, the novel identified peptide, is the endogenous ligand for the APJ. Previous studies have reported the effect of apelin on food intake, however the action of acute central injected apelin on food intake in mice remains unknown. The present study was designed to investigate the mechanism as well as the effect of central apelin-13 on food intake in mice. During the dark period, the cumulative food intake was significantly decreased at 4h after the intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of 1 and 3μg/mouse apelin-13 and the period food intake was significantly reduced during 2-4h after treatment. In the fasted mice, the cumulative food intake was significantly decreased at 2 and 4h after injection of 3μg/mouse apelin-13. The cumulative water intake was significantly reduced by apelin-13 (3μg/mouse) at 4h after injection in freely feeding and fasted mice. However, during light period, apelin-13 had no influence on food and water intake in freely feeding mice. The APJ receptor antagonist apelin-13(F13A) (6μg/mouse) and the corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor antagonist α-helical CRF(9-41) (3μg/mouse) could reverse the inhibitory effect on cumulative food intake/0-4h induced by apelin-13 (3μg/mouse) in freely feeding mice during the dark period, whereas the anorexic effect could not be antagonized by the arginie vasopressin (AVP) receptor antagonist deamino(CH(2))(5)Tyr(Me)AVP (0.5μg/mouse). Taken together, these results suggest that central apelin-13 inhibits food intake in mice and it seems that APJ receptor and CRF receptor, but not AVP receptor, might be involved in this process.     

Possible involvement of mu1-opioid receptors in the fentanyl- or morphine-induced antinociception at supraspinal and spinal sites

Fentanyl has been shown to be a potent analgesic with a lower propensity to produce tolerance and physical dependence in the clinical setting. The present study was designed to investigate the mechanisms of fentanyl- or morphine-induced antinociception at both supraspinal and spinal sites. In the mouse tail-flick test, the antinociceptive effects induced by both fentanyl and morphine were blocked by either the mu1-opioid receptor antagonist naloxonazine or the mu1/mu2-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA) after s.c., i.c.v. or i.t. injection. In contrast, both fentanyl and morphine given i.c.v. or i.t. failed to produce antinociception in mu1-deficient CXBK mice. These findings indicate that like morphine, the antinociception induced by fentanyl may be mediated predominantly through mu1-opioid receptors at both supraspinal and spinal sites in mice. We also determined the ED50 values for s.c.-, i.c.v.- and i.t.-administered fentanyl- or morphine-induced antinociception in mice. The ED50 values for s.c.-, i.c.v.- and i.t.-administered fentanyl-induced antinociception were 73.7, 18.5 and 1.2-fold lower than that of morphine, respectively. The present data clearly suggest the usefulness of peripheral treatment with fentanyl for the control of pain.     

Study on the molecular mechanism of antinociception induced by ghrelin in acute pain in mice

Ghrelin has been identified as the endogenous ligand for the GHS-R1α (growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1 alpha). Our previous experiments have indicated that ghrelin (i.c.v.) induces antinociceptive effects in acute pain in mice, and the effects were mediated through the central opioid receptors and GHS-R1α. However, which opioid receptor (OR) mediates the antinociceptive effects and the molecular mechanisms are also needed to be further explored. In the present study, the antinociceptive effects of ghrelin (i.c.v.) could be fully antagonized by δ-opioid receptor antagonist NTI. Furthermore, the mRNA and protein levels of δ-opioid peptide PENK and δ-opioid receptor OPRD were increased after i.c.v injection of ghrelin. Thus, it showed that the antinociception of ghrelin was correlated with the GHS-R1α and δ-opioid receptors. To explore which receptor was firstly activated by ghrelin, GHS-R1α antagonist [D-Lys³]-GHRP-6 was co-injection (i.c.v.) with deltorphin II (selective δ-opioid receptor agonist). Finally, the antinociception induced by deltorphin II wasn’t blocked by the co-injection (i.c.v.) of [D-Lys³]-GHRP-6, indicating that the GHS-R1α isn’t on the backward position of δ-opioid receptor. The results suggested that i.c.v. injection of ghrelin initially activated the GHS-R1α, which in turn increased the release of endogenous PENK to activation of OPRD to produce antinociception.     

Streptozotocin-induced diabetes selectively enhances antinociception mediated by δ1-but not δ2-opioid receptors

We assessed the effect of diabetes on antinociception produced by intracerebroventricular injection of δ-opioid receptor agonists [D-Pen^2,5]enkephalin (DPDPE) and [D-Ala²]deltorphin II. The antinociceptive effect of DPDPE (10 nmol), administered i.c.v., was significantly greater in diabetic mice than in non-diabetic mice. The antinociceptive effect of i.c.v. DPDPE was significantly reduced in both diabetic and non-diabetic mice following pretreatment with 7-benzylidenenaltrexone (BNTX), a selective δ₁-opioid receptor antagonist, but not with naltriben (NTB), a selective δ₂- opioid receptor antagonist. There were no significant differences in the anticiceptive effect of [D-Ala²]deltorphin II (3 nmol, i.c.v.) in diabetic and non-diabetic mice. Furthermore, the antinociceptive effect of i.c.v. [D-Ala²]deltorphin II was significantly reduced in both diabetic and non-diabetic mice following pretreatment with NTB, but not with BNTX. In conclusion, mice with diabetes are selectively hyper-responsive to supraspinal δ₁-opioid receptor-mediated antinociception, but are normally responsive to activation of δ₂-opiod receptors.     

Antinociceptive effects of [D-Ala2]deltorphin II, a highly selective delta agonist in vivo

The present study has characterized the antinociceptive actions of [D-Ala2]deltorphin II following intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration in the mouse tail-flick test. [D-Ala2]deltorphin II produced dose- and time-related antinociception, with maximal effects at +10 min and significant antinociception which lasted for 40-60 min. [D-Ala2]deltorphin II was 13-fold more potent than i.c.v. [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE), a second highly selective delta agonist, and approximately equipotent with i.c.v. morphine in producing antinociception. The antinociceptive effects of i.c.v. [D-Ala2]deltorphin II and DPDPE, but not those of morphine, were antagonized by the selective delta antagonist, ICI 174,864. In contrast, pretreatment with the non-equilibrium mu antagonist, beta-funaltrexamine blocked morphine antinociception, but failed to antagonize [D-Ala2]deltorphin II and DPDPE antinociception. These data indicate that [D-Ala2]deltorphin II produced its antinociceptive effects at a supraspinal delta receptor. [D-Ala2]deltorphin II appears to be the most appropriate delta opioid agonist currently available for studies in vivo and support the involvement of delta receptors in supraspinal antinociception.     

Synergistic analgesic effects between neuronostatin and morphine at the supraspinal level

Neuronostatin, a 13-amino acid peptide, is encoded in the somatostatin pro-hormone. I.c.v. administration of neuronostatin produces a significant antinociceptive effect in the mouse tail-flick test, which is mediated by endogenous opioid receptor. However, the direct functional interaction between morphine and neuronostatin has not been characterized. In the present study, effect of neuronostatin on morphine analgesia was investigated in the tail-flick test. Our findings showed that i.c.v. administration of neuronostatin (0.3 nmol/mouse i.c.v.) significantly enhanced the antinociceptive effect of morphine (2.5, 5 or 10 μg/kg) at the supraspinal level. Results of antagonism experiments suggested that the synergistic analgesia induced by morphine and neuronostatin was mediated by μ- and к-opioid receptors not δ-opioid receptor. In conclusion, there may be a cascade amplification phenomenon when morphine and neuronostatin were co-administered in acute pain model. The above results provide evidence for the potential use of neuronostatin in combination with morphine to control pain and addiction.     

Antinociception produced by systemic, spinal and supraspinal administration of amiloride in mice.

This study investigates the antinociceptive and antihyperalgesic action caused by i.p., i.t. or i.c.v. injections of amiloride when assessed against formalin, capsaicin-induced licking, acetic acid-induced writhing and glutamate-induced hyperalgesia in mice. The systemic, spinal and supraspinal administration of amiloride causes dose-related antinociception when assessed against acetic acid-induced writhing, formalin and capsaicin-induced licking. In addition, amiloride administered by the same routes produced graded inhibition of glutamate-induced hyperalgesia in mice. Together, these results suggest, that amiloride or its derivatives may constitute a strategy for the development of new antinociceptive drugs.     

The involvement of nitric oxide in the analgesic effects of ketamine

We investigated the contribution of NO-cyclic GMP (cGMP) pathway to the antinociceptive effects of ketamine in mice by using the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, nitro(g)- L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). Intraperitoneal (i.p.) (1, 5 or 10 mg/kg) or intrathecal (i.th.) (10, 30 or 60 microg/mouse) administration of ketamine produced dose-dependent antinociceptive effects in the acetic acid-induced writhing and formalin tests but not in the tail-flick nor in hot-plate tests. Pretreatment of mice with L-NAME (10 mg/kg, i.p.) which produced no antinociception on its own, significantly inhibited the antinociceptive effect of ketamine (1, 5 or 10 mg/kg, i.p.). However, L-NAME (30 microg/mouse) was given intrathecally, it neither modified the antinociceptive effect of i.th. ketamine (10, 30 or 60 microg/mouse) nor did it produce an antinociceptive effect alone. These data suggest that the activation of the NO-cGMP pathway probably at the supraspinal level, but not spinal level, contributes to the antinociceptive effects of ketamine.     

Opioid activity of C8813, a novel and potent opioid analgesic

Compound trans-4-(p-bromophenyl)-4-(dimethylamino)-1-(2-thiophen-2-yl-ethyl)-cyclohexanol (C8813), structurally unrelated to morphine, is a novel analgesic. The present study examined the antinociception, opioid receptor selectivity and in vitro activity of C8813. The antinociceptive activity was evaluated using mouse hot plate and acetic acid writhing tests. In mouse hot plate test, the antinociceptive ED(50) of C8813 was 11.5 microg/kg, being 591 times and 3.4 times more potent than morphine and fentanyl respectively. In mouse writhing test, the antinociceptive ED(50) of C8813 was 16.9 microg/kg, being 55 times and 2.3 times more active than morphine and fentanyl respectively. In the opioid receptor binding assay, C8813 showed high affinity for mu-opioid receptor (K(i) = 1.37 nM) and delta-opioid receptor (K(i) = 3.24 nM) but almost no affinity for kappa-opioid receptor (at 1 microM). In the bioassay, the inhibitory effect of C8813 in the guinea-pig ileum (GPI) was 16.5 times more potent than in the mouse vas deferens (MVD). The inhibitory effects of C8813 in the GPI and MVD could be antagonized by mu-opioid receptor antagonist naloxone and delta-opioid receptor antagonist ICI174,864 respectively. However, the inhibitory effect of C8813 in the rabbit vas deferens was very weak. These results indicated that C8813 was a potent analgesic and a high affinity agonist for the mu- and delta-opioid receptors.     

Antagonism of phosphoramidon-induced antinociception in mice by mu- but not kappa-opioid receptor blockers

Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of the neutral endopeptidase 24.11-inhibitor phosphoramidon evoked a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in the mouse acetic acid abdominal constriction test. The present study was conducted to identify the opioid receptor subtype(s) that mediate phosphoramidon antinociception in this paradigm. Mice were pretreated with different opioid antagonists prior to being challenged with phosphoramidon, i.c.v., the mu-opioid agonist sufentanil, s.c., or the kappa-opioid agonist U-50,488H, s.c. Naltrexone significantly attenuated phosphoramidon-induced antinociception at an i.c.v. dose that also blocked both sufentanil and U-50,488H. The mu-opioid antagonist beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA) blocked phosphoramidon and sufentanil at an i.c.v. dose that did not block U-50,488H. The kappa-opioid antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI) produced dose-related effects. A low dose (10 microg) of nor-BNI had no effect on either phosphoramidon or sufentanil but did reduce U-50,488H antinociception. A higher dose (30 microg) of nor-BNI blocked phosphoramidon, sufentanil, and U-50,488H, suggesting a loss of kappa-opioid receptor selectivity at this dose. These findings suggest that mu- but not kappa-opioid receptors mediate phosphoramidon-induced antinociception in the abdominal constriction test.     

Contribution of spinal mu(1)-opioid receptors and dynorphin B to the antinociception induced by Tyr-d-Arg-Phe-Sar

The antinociceptive effect of Tyr-d-Arg-Phe-Sar (TAPS) at the spinal level was characterized with the mouse tail-flick test. Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of TAPS produced a dose-dependent antinociception. The antinociception induced by TAPS was completely blocked by i.t. pretreatment with the mu-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine, the mu(1)-opioid receptor antagonist naloxonazine or the kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine, but not with the delta-opioid receptor antagonist naltrindole. Moreover, TAPS-induced antinociception was dose-dependently attenuated by i.t. pretreatment with an antiserum against dynorphin B, but not against dynorphin A, alpha-neo-endorphin, [Met(5)]enkephalin, or [Leu(5)]enkephalin. In mice lacking prodynorphin, TAPS-induced antinociception was significantly reduced compared to that in wild-type mice. These results suggest that TAPS mainly stimulates mu(1)-opioid receptors, which subsequently induce the release of dynorphin B, which then acts on kappa-opioid receptors to produce antinociception.     

In vivo characterization of the effects of ghrelin on the modulation of acute pain at the supraspinal level in mice

Ghrelin, an acylated peptide produced in the stomach, increases food intake and growth hormone secretion, inhibits pro-inflammatory cascade, etc. Ghrelin and its receptor (GHS-R1a) mRNA were found in the area related to the regions for controlling pain transmission, such as the hypothalamus, the midbrain, the spinal cord, etc. Ghrelin has been shown to have antinociceptive activity and also anti-inflammatory properties in inflammatory pain and chronic neuropathic pain. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of ghrelin for the first time in the acute pain modulation at the supraspinal level, using the tail withdrawal test and hot-plate test in mice. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of ghrelin (mouse, 0.1–3 nmol) produced a dose- and time-related antinociceptive effect in the tail withdrawal test and hot-plate test, respectively. Antinociceptive effect elicited by ghrelin (i.c.v., 1 nmol) was significantly antagonized by opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (i.c.v., 10 nmol co-injection or i.p., 10 mg/kg, 10 min prior to ghrelin) in both tail withdrawal test and hot-plate test. At these doses, naloxone significantly antagonized the antinociceptive effect induced by morphine (i.c.v., 3 nmol). Ghrelin (i.c.v., 1 nmol)-induced antinociception was significantly antagonized by co-injection with 10 nmol [d-Lys3]-GHRP-6, the selective antagonist of GHS-R1a identified more recently, while [d-Lys3]-GHRP-6 (10 nmol) alone induced neither hyperalgesia nor antinociception. Overall this data indicate that ghrelin could produce antinociception through an interaction with GHS-R1a and with the central opioid system. Thus ghrelin may be a promising peptide for developing new analgesic drugs.     

Antibodies raised against the N-terminal sequence of δ opioid receptors blocjed δ-mediated supraspinal antinociception in mice

A polyclonal antiserum directed against the first 16 aminoacids of the N-terminal sequence of the murine δ opioid receptor was raised in rabbits. The intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection to mice of the anti δ receptor IgGs impaired the antinociception produced by DPDPE, [D-Ala²]- Deltorphin II, DADLE and β-endorphin-(1–31) when studied 24 h later in the tail-flick test. Antinociception produced by morphine and DAMGO was fully expressed in mice undergoing this treatment. The selective δ antagonist ICI 174864 (0.8 nmols/mouse, i.c.v.) significantly reduced the antinociceptive activity of opioids to the extent observed after giving the antibodies. ICI 174864 did not decrease further the antinociception that remained after the anti δ receptor serum. The specific binding displayed by 3 nM [³H]-DPDPE was reduced in membranes pre-incubated with the antiserum, whereas no change could be detected for 0.6 nM [³H]-DAMGO labelling μ receptors. This experimental approach revealed the δ component of opioid-evoked supraspinal antinociception in mice.     

Involvement of spinal release of α-neo-endorphin on the antinociceptive effect of TAPA

The antinociceptive effect of i.t.-administered Tyr-d-Arg-Phe-β-Ala (TAPA), an N-terminal tetrapeptide analog of dermorphin, was characterized in ddY mice. In the mouse tail-flick test, TAPA administered i.t. produced a potent antinociception. The antinociception induced by TAPA was significantly attenuated by i.t. pretreatment with the κ-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine, as well as by the μ-opioid receptor antagonist β-funaltrexamine and the μ₁-opioid receptor antagonist naloxonazine. TAPA-induced antinociception was also significantly suppressed by co-administration of the μ₁-opioid receptor antagonist Tyr-d-Pro-Phe-Phe-NH₂ (d-Pro²-endomorphin-2) but not by co-administration of the μ₂-opioid receptor antagonists Tyr-d-Pro-Trp-Phe-NH₂ (d-Pro²-endomorphin-1) and Tyr-d-Pro-Trp-Gly-NH₂ (d-Pro²-Tyr-W-MIF-1). In CXBK mice whose μ₁-opioid receptors were naturally reduced, the antinociceptive effect of TAPA was markedly suppressed compared to the parental strain C57BL/6ByJ mice. Moreover, the antinociception induced by TAPA was significantly attenuated by i.t. pretreatment with antiserum against the endogenous κ-opioid peptide α-neo-endorphin but not antisera against other endogenous opioid peptides. In prodynorphin-deficient mice, the antinociceptive effect of TAPA was significantly reduced compared to wild-type mice. These results suggest that the spinal antinociception induced by TAPA is mediated in part through the release of α-neo-endorphin in the spinal cord via activation of spinal μ₁-opioid receptors.     

Nav 1.8-null mice show stimulus-dependent deficits in spinal neuronal activity

Extracellular ATP is known to mediate synaptic transmission as a neurotransmitter or a neuromodulator via ionotropic P2X and metabotropic P2Y receptors. Several lines of evidence have suggested that ATP facilitates pain transmission at peripheral and spinal sites via the P2X receptors, in which the P2X₃ subtype is considered as an important candidate for the effect. Conversely, we previously found that the activation of supraspinal P2X receptors evoked antinociception. However, the subtypes responsible for the antinociception via supraspinal P2X receptors remain unclear. In the present study, we showed that intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) pretreatment with A-317491 (1 nmol), the novel non-nucleotide antagonist selective for P2X₃ and P2X_2/3 receptors, attenuated the antinociceptive effect produced by i.c.v. administered α,β-methylene-ATP (10 nmol), the P2X receptor agonist, in rats. Similarly, the abolishment of the P2X₃ receptor mRNA in the brainstem by repeated i.c.v. pretreatments with antisense oligodeoxynucleotide for P2X₃ gene once a day for 5 consecutive days diminished the antinociceptive effect of α,β-methylene-ATP. Furthermore, i.c.v. administration of A-317491 (1 and 10 nmol) significantly enhanced the inflammatory nociceptive behaviors induced by the intraplantar injection of formalin and intraperitoneal injection of acetic acid. Taken together, these results suggest that supraspinal P2X₃/P2X_2/3 receptors play an inhibitory role in pain transmission.     

Pharmacological analysis of inhomogeneous static magnetic field-induced antinociceptive action in the mouse

The effect of inhomogeneous, 2-754 mT static magnetic field (SMF) on visceral pain elicited by intraperitoneal injection of 0.6% acetic acid (writhing test) was studied in the mouse. Exposure of mice to static magnetic field (permanent NdFeB N50 grade 10 mm x 10 mm cylindrical magnets with alternating poles) during the nociceptive stimulus (0-30 min) resulted in inhibition of pain reaction: the number of writhings decreased from 9 +/- 2, 32 +/- 4 and 30 +/- 3 to 2 +/- 0.03, 15 +/- 1.6, and 14 +/- 1.6, respectively, measured in 0-5th, 6-20th, and 21-30th min following the acetic acid challenge. The pain reaction during the total observation period was reduced by 57% (P < 0.005). The analgesic action induced by SMF was inhibited by subcutaneous administration of naloxone (1 and 0.2 mg kg(-1)), irreversible micro-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine (20 mg kg(-1)) and delta-opioid receptor antagonist naltrindole (0.5 mg kg(-1)), but the kappa-opioid receptor antagonist norbinaltorphimine (20 mg kg(-1)) failed to affect the SMF-induced antinociception. In contrast to the subcutaneous administration, the intracerebroventricularly injected naloxone (10 microg mouse(-1)) did not antagonize the antinociceptive effect of SMF. The results suggest that acute exposure of mice to static magnetic field results in an opioid-mediated analgesic action in the writhing test in the mouse. The antinociceptive effect is likely to be mediated by micro and (to a lesser extent) delta-opioid receptors.     

Possible involvement of dynorphin A release via mu1-opioid receptor on supraspinal antinociception of endomorphin-2

It has been demonstrated that the antinociception induced by i.t. or i.c.v. administration of endomorphins is mediated through mu-opioid receptors. Moreover, though endomorphins do not have appreciable affinity for kappa-opioid receptors, pretreatment with the kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine markedly blocks the antinociception induced by i.c.v.- or i.t.-injected endomorphin-2, but not endomorphin-1. These evidences propose the hypothesis that endomorphin-2 may initially stimulate the mu-opioid receptors, which subsequently induces the release of dynorphins acting on kappa-opioid receptors to produce antinociception. The present study was performed to determine whether the release of dynorphins by i.c.v.-administered endomorphin-2 is mediated through mu-opioid receptors for producing antinociception. Intracerebroventricular pretreatment with an antiserum against dynorphin A, but not dynorphin B or alpha-neo-endorphin, and s.c. pretreatment with kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine dose-dependently attenuated the antinociception induced by i.c.v.-administered endomorphin-2, but not endomorphin-1 and DAMGO. The attenuation of endomorphin-2-induced antinociception by pretreatment with antiserum against dynorphin A or nor-binaltorphimine was dose-dependently eliminated by additional s.c. pretreatment with a selective mu-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine or a selective mu(1)-opioid receptor antagonist naloxonazine at ultra low doses, which are inactive against mu-opioid receptor agonists in antinociception, suggesting that endomorphin-2 stimulates distinct subclass of mu(1)-opioid receptor that induces the release of dynorphin A acting on kappa-opioid receptors in the brain. It concludes that the antinociception induced by supraspinally administered endomorphin-2 is in part mediated through the release of endogenous kappa-opioid peptide dynorphin A, which is caused by the stimulation of distinct subclass of mu(1)-opioid receptor.     

The spinal antinociceptive effect of FR140423 is mediated through kyotorphin receptors

We investigated the antinociceptive effect of a novel anti-inflammatory and analgesic drug, 3-(difluoromethyl)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-[4-(methylsulfinyl)phenyl]pyraz ole (FR140423), in the tail-pinch test in mice, and evaluated the mechanism of action of FR140423 using L-leucyl-L-arginine (Leu-Arg), a kyotorphin (endogenous Met-enkephalin releaser) receptor antagonist, L-NG-nitroarginine methylester (L-NAME), an inhibitor of nitric oxide (NO) synthase, and methylene blue (MB), an inhibitor of activation of guanylate cyclase. Oral administration of FR140423, at doses of 5-80 mg/kg, produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect with an ED50 value of 18 mg/kg. This antinociception was reversed by intrathecal (i.t.) (10 microg/mouse), but not by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) (100 microg/mouse), injection of Leu-Arg. Moreover, the antinociceptive effect of i.t. injection of FR140423 with an ED50 value of 3.7 microg/mouse was completely antagonized by co-administered Leu-Arg 10 microg/mouse. However, L-NAME (2000 mg/kg s.c.) and MB (200 mg/kg s.c.) did not antagonize the antinociception of FR140423. These findings suggest that FR140423 plays a role in nociceptive modulation in the spinal cord, being antinociceptive via the kyotorphin-Met-enkephalin pathway but not via the peripheral NO-cyclic GMP pathway.     

Antinociceptive effect of sumatriptan in mice.

Antinociceptive effect of the antimigraine drug sumatriptan (5-HT1A agonist) was studied against acetic acid-induced writhing in mice. Sumatriptan produced the effect in a dose-dependent manner (1, 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg, s.c.). Naloxone (1 mg/kg i.p.) an opiate antagonist failed to reverse sumatriptan-induced antinociception. Cholinomimetic physostigmine (0.05 mg/kg, i.p.) potentiated and the muscarinic antagonist atropine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) blocked the antinociceptive effect of sumatriptan, respectively. The antinociceptive effect of sumatriptan was compared with an another 5-HT agonist (5-HT1A) buspirone which also produced antinociception. Like sumatriptan-analgesia, the buspirone response was also potentiated by physostigmine in atropine sensitive way. Further, buspirone potentiated the analgesic effect of sumatriptan. These observations suggest that 5-HT1A agonists produce antinociception possibly by modulating central cholinergic activity.