腰椎多节段退变性滑脱的手术治疗

目的:研讨腰椎多节段退变性滑脱手术减压和植骨融合方式与疗效的关系。方法:20例腰椎多节段退变性滑脱患者行后路椎弓根螺钉复位内固定后,采用椎管减压、神经根松解,行椎间植骨和后外侧植骨融合术,采用日本整形外科学会(JOA)下腰痛评分标准评价疗效。结果:获得连续随访者18例,随访时间9月～3年,平均24个月,优良率90%。结论:可靠的内固定、复位,神经根松解,椎间植骨融合治疗腰椎多节段退变性滑脱效果满意,充分的神经根松解是手术治疗的关键。     

不同植骨融合方法治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的疗效评价

目的:比较Cage植骨和椎体间骨粒直接植骨两种植骨融合方法治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的疗效.方法:我科自2004年9月至2006年10月采用腰椎滑脱复位系统(Spondylolisthesis reduction system,SRS)共治疗40例退行性腰椎滑脱症,分成A,B两组,其中A组19例行Cage植骨,B组21例行椎体阃骨粒直接植骨,按侯树勋等[1]的疗效评定标准比较术后两组的临床疗效,同时比较两组手术时间,术中术后出血量,平均融合率,术后椎间隙高度变化.结果:两组手术时间、术中术后出血量、平均椎间隙高度变化差异有显著性;40例患者获得10月-3年(平均1.9年)随访,两组临床症状术后有明显改善,临床症状改善率、融合率差异无显著性.两组都无症状加重,无内固定松动或断裂发生.结论:SRS治疗腰椎滑脱症时,采用Cage植骨与椎体间骨粒直接植骨其融合率和临床优良率无显著性差异.椎体间骨粒直接植骨手术操作更简便,手术时间更短(P=0.000),术中术后出血量更少(p=0.000).     

椎弓根内固定联合椎体间植骨融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的临床探讨

目的:探讨椎弓根内固定联合椎体间植骨融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析我院2012年3月至2014年3月收治的30例采用椎弓根内固定联合椎体间植骨融合术治疗的退行性腰椎滑脱症患者临床资料,观察患者对手术效果的满意度,并对症状进行JOA评分。比较患者术前术后的腰椎X线的影像学变化,观察术后临近节段的退变发生率与影像的融合率。结果:术后随访1-3年发现患者JOA评分的平均改善率为(73.81±16.12)%,术后滑脱率与椎间高度均有明显改善,与术前比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后影像学显示植骨融合A级15例,B级12例,C级3例,融合优良率为90%。结论:椎弓根内固定联合椎体间植骨融合术对退行性腰椎滑脱症具有显著的临床效果,不仅可以缓解疼痛,改善功能评分,而且使患者影像学变化恢复正常生理形态,是理想的手术方法之一。     

成人退行性腰椎侧弯合并滑脱的手术治疗

目的:探讨退行性腰椎侧弯合并滑脱的手术方法和临床疗效.方法:25例适应证患者行后路椎弓根螺钉内固定复位矫形后,采用椎管减压、神经根松解,行椎间植骨和后外侧植骨融合术,术后测量退变性脊柱侧弯的矫正效果,依照日本整形外科学会(JOA)下腰痛评分,观察腰腿疼痛改善情况.结果:全部病例获得随访,随访时间6月～3年,平均20个月,术后平均侧弯矫正率58.7%,疼痛改善优良率80%.结论:椎弓根固定系统结合椎间及后外侧植骨融合术是治疗退行性腰椎侧弯合并滑脱的有效方法.应重视术中神经根减压,矫正腰椎侧弯,恢复腰椎力学平衡,有助于提高远期疗效.     

经后路一期病灶清除、自体植骨融合、内固定治疗胸腰椎结核疗效观察

目的:研究经后路一期病灶清除、自体植骨融合、内固定治疗胸腰椎结核的疗效.方法:选择胸腰椎结核的患者作为研究对象,随机分为给予自体植骨融合的观察组和椎间融合器植骨融合的对照组,观察手术相关指标、椎体功能相关指标、活动状态和生活质量.结果:观察组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后卧床时间、Cobb角均明显少于对照组;治疗后椎间隙高度、椎体融合率、KPS评分和生活质量优良率明显高于对照组.结论:经后路一期病灶清除、自体植骨融合、内固定治疗能够改善治疗效果、提高生活质量,具有积极的临床价值.     

一期前路病灶清除植骨内固定治疗胸腰椎结核

目的探讨前路一期病灶清除、植骨、前路内固定手术治疗胸腰椎结核的疗效。方法 2010~2013年我院对42例胸腰椎结核患者进行一期病灶清除植骨前路内固定,病变节段:T5~T108例,T11~L129例,L2~L45例。其中病变累及1个椎体29例,累及2个椎体10例,跳跃型和累及3个椎体3例。累及1个椎体者应用Z-PlateⅡ钛板内固定,累及2个椎体或上胸椎结核者则选用钉-棒系统(CDH M8)固定。术后抗结核治疗不少于9个月。结果 42例患者均得到随访,随访时间6个月~4年,平均2.6年。手术切口均1期愈合,术后全身症状及局部疼痛消失,神经症状有不同程度恢复,所有病灶愈合,其中39例患者植骨融合,内固定牢固;3例患者因过早进行重体力劳动导致螺钉松动,植骨块塌陷,再次出现后凸畸形,经再次手术后治愈。结论一期病灶清除植骨内固定手术结合规范药物抗痨治疗胸腰椎结核的临床疗效显著、可靠。     

椎体加椎间植骨融合术在腰椎爆裂性骨折患者中的应用效果与安全性探究

目的:探讨椎体加椎间植骨融合术在治疗腰椎爆裂性骨折患者中的临床效果及安全性。方法:选取2016年12月～2017年10月我院骨科收治的腰椎爆裂性骨折患者90例,按照手术方式将患者分成研究组和对照组,每组45例。研究组给予后路内固定术联合椎体加椎间植骨术治疗,对照组给予后路内固定术联合后外侧植骨术治疗。比较两组患者的手术时间、手术出血量以及术后3个月和12个月的椎体Cobb角、患者术后骨折愈合情况、内固定有效情况。结果:研究组手术时间、术中出血量、术后3个月和12个月椎体Cobb角明显短于或低于对照组,但骨折愈合率、内固定有效率显著高于对照组,组间差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:椎体加椎间植骨融合术治疗腰椎爆裂性骨折的临床综合效果显著优于后路内固定术联合后外侧植骨术治疗,且安全性较好。     

椎间植骨粒体积对腰椎滑脱融合内固定术融合效果的影响

目的:探讨在腰椎后路植骨融合手术中,椎间植骨粒的体积对手术效果的影响。方法:回顾性分析我院2012年5月-2013年9月采用腰椎后路植骨融合术的75例患者的临床资料,根据患者手术中椎间植骨粒体积不同分为A组(小体积组,5粒/cm3)、B组(中体积组,11粒/cm3)以及C组(大体积组,23粒/cm3)。分析三组患者的植骨粒体积、植骨融合率以及手术效果。结果:三组患者植骨粒体积比较,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);椎间植骨总体积比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。与术前比较,三组术后ODI指数及VAS评分明显下降,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);但三组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。B组植骨融合率高于A组及C组,而A组高于C组,组间比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。手术后各组椎体滑脱程度与术前相比得到明显改善(P0.05)。结论:腰椎滑脱内固定术中应用中等体积植骨粒可明显提高椎体间融合率。     

一期经后路固定联合侧前方入路病灶清除植骨融合术治疗老年下腰椎结核临床效果观察

目的：探究一期经后路固定联合侧前方入路病灶清除植骨融合术治疗老年下腰椎结核临床效果。方法：回顾性分析我院2007年1月-2010年12月收治下腰椎结核老年患者共84例,分别设立实验组和对照组。实验组42例采用后路固定联合侧前方入路病灶清除植骨融合术治疗老年下腰椎结核,对照组42例采用前路病灶清除。分别对两组一期治疗后临床效果进行观察,对患者术后腰椎局部前凸角、Oswestry障碍指数（ODI）及脊髓损伤神经功能分级标准（ASIA）分级进行客观评定。结果：实验组一期经后路固定联合侧前方入路病灶清除植骨融合术治疗老年下腰椎结核,术后腰椎局部前凸角为（8．22±1．67）°,明显优于对照组患者术后腰椎局部前凸角为（5．02±1．93）°,（P〉0．05）;实验组患者术后ODI为（21．25±3．75）％,对照组ODI为（35．72±4．15）％,实验组疗效优于对照组（P〈0．05）;实验组患者术后ASIA分级全部转化为E级。而对照组仍有7人为D级。结论：一期经后路固定联合侧前方入路病灶清除植骨融合术治疗老年下腰椎结核具有显著的临床效果,应进一步临床推广。     

骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉联合椎间融合复位治疗老年重度腰椎滑脱的临床研究

摘要 目的：观察椎间融合复位联合骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉治疗老年重度腰椎滑脱的临床效果。方法：回顾性分析我院于2016年3月~2019年3月期间收治的老年重度腰椎滑脱患者92例,根据治疗方案的不同可将患者分为A组（n=44）和B组（n=48）,A组给予椎弓根螺钉联合椎间融合复位治疗,B组给予骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉联合椎间融合复位治疗,对比两组视觉疼痛模拟评分（VAS）、Oswestry功能障碍指数（ODI）及日本骨科协会（JOA）腰腿痛评分、临床指标、滑脱距离、滑脱率、椎间隙高度、椎间融合率、椎间孔高度、并发症及螺钉松动情况。结果：术后12个月,两组VAS、ODI、JOA评分均下降,且B组低于A组（P<0.05）。两组术中出血量对比组间无统计学差异（P>0.05）,B组手术时间长于A组,住院时间短于A组,椎间融合率高于A组（P<0.05）。术后12个月,两组滑脱距离、滑脱率均下降,且B组小于A组（P<0.05）。术后12个月,两组椎间隙高度、椎间孔高度均升高,且B组高于A组（P<0.05）。两组并发症发生率组间对比无差异（P>0.05）。结论：老年重度腰椎滑脱患者椎间融合复位联合骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉治疗,虽一定程度上延长了手术时间,但可促进临床症状,改善椎间高度及腰椎滑脱程度,缩短住院时间,且不增加并发症发生率。     

Biomechanical evaluation of a novel lumbosacral axial fixation device

BACKGROUND: Interbody arthrodesis is employed in the lumbar spine to eliminate painful motion and achieve stability through bony fusion. Bone grafts, metal cages, composite spacers, and growth factors are available and can be placed through traditional open techniques or minimally invasively. Whether placed anteriorly, posteriorly, or laterally, insertion of these implants necessitates compromise of the anulus--an inherently destabilizing procedure. A new axial percutaneous approach to the lumbosacral spine has been described. Using this technique, vertical access to the lumbosacral spine is achieved percutaneously via the presacral space. An implant that can be placed across a motion segment without compromise to the anulus avoids surgical destabilization and may be advantageous for interbody arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro biomechanical performance of the axial fixation rod, an anulus sparing, centrally placed interbody fusion implant for motion segment stabilization. METHOD OF APPROACH: Twenty-four bovine lumbar motion segments were mechanically tested using an unconstrainedflexibility protocol in sagittal and lateral bending, and torsion. Motion segments were also tested in axial compression. Each specimen was tested in an intact state, then drilled (simulating a transaxial approach to the lumbosacral spine), then with one of two axial fixation rods placed in the spine for stabilization. The range of motion, bending stiffness, and axial compressive stiffness were determined for each test condition. Results were compared to those previously reported for femoral ring allografts, bone dowels, BAK and BAK Proximity cages, Ray TFC, Brantigan ALIF and TLIF implants, the InFix Device, Danek TIBFD, single and double Harms cages, and Kaneda, Isola, and University plating systems. RESULTS: While axial drilling of specimens had little effect on stiffness and range of motion, specimens implanted with the axial fixation rod exhibited significant increases in stiffness and decreases in range of motion relative to intact state. When compared to existing anterior, posterior, and interbody instrumentation, lateral and sagittal bending stiffness of the axial fixation rod exceeded that of all other interbody devices, while stiffness in extension and axial compression were comparable to plate and rod constructs. Torsional stiffness was comparable to other interbody constructs and slightly lower than plate and rod constructs. CONCLUSIONS: For stabilization of the L5-S1 motion segment, axial placement of implants offers potential benefits relative to traditional exposures. The preliminary biomechanical data from this study indicate that the axial fixation rod compares favorably to other devices and may be suitable to reduce pathologic motion at L5-S1, thus promoting bony fusion.     

新型骨水泥椎弓根螺钉在治疗腰椎滑脱合并骨质疏松症的应用研究

目的:探讨评估聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(polymethvlmethacnrlat, PMMA)增强的具有"渐变孔"结构的侧开孔中空椎弓根螺钉(Fenestrated pedicle screw, FPS)治疗腰椎滑脱症的安全性及疗效。方法:回顾性分析2013年1月～2017年12月收治32例合并有骨质疏松症的腰椎滑脱患者,均应用具有"渐变孔"结构的FPS融合手术治疗,记录手术时长、术中出血量,住院时长;测量椎间隙高度、椎体楔形变指数、滑脱距离、滑脱角、骨盆指数、腰椎前凸角;随访评估Oswestry功能障碍指数问卷表(Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire, ODI)评分和视觉模拟评分法(Visual Analogue Score, VAS)评分,比较分析术前、术后及末次随访时的差异;结果:术中X线及术后三维CT检查发现3枚渗漏的骨水泥螺钉(2.2%),均为Yeom C型,术后无不适。随访7～61个月(平均34.9个月),滑脱复位良好,后凸畸形和矢状位失衡矫正良好,ODI评分和VAS评分均较术前有显著改善(p0.05)。随访期间,全部病例滑脱无复发,无椎弓根螺钉松动、断裂,无椎间隙塌陷,根据SUK标准融合成功率100%。结论:新型骨水泥螺钉能够提供良好的固定稳定性,并且能够避免骨水泥渗漏发生以及螺钉松动脱出,为骨质疏松脊柱手术提供一种新的选择。     

腰椎Cage手术并发症分析及其防治

目的:分析后路腰椎椎间cage融合术常见的并发症并探讨对策。方法:对89例腰椎间盘突出症、下腰椎失稳症患者,经临床症状、体征和影像资料明确诊断且具有手术指征,并采用后路cage融合术治疗,对其中出现的并发症进行原因分析。结果:89例中出现并发症的有24例,包括神经症状加重、脑脊液漏、感染等近期并发症和症状缓解不明显、植骨不融合等远期并发症。术后神经症状加重5例,主要与手术适应症选择正确与否、影像学资料阅读能力高低、术者操作技能熟练程度等因素有关。结论:cage融合术是外科治疗椎间盘突出症的一种优良方法,术后神经症状加重和神经根损伤是最常见的并发症,正确把握手术适应症、熟练掌握操作技巧、提高并发症的诊断和处理能力是顺利开展该技术、提高临床疗效的关键。     

Biomechanical differences of Coflex-F and pedicle screw fixation combined with TLIF or ALIF--a finite element study

Lumbar interbody fusion is a common procedure for treating lower back pain related to degenerative disc diseases. The Coflex-F is a recently developed interspinous spacer, the makers of which claim that it can provide stabilisation similar to pedicle screw fixation. Therefore, this study compares the biomechanical behaviour of the Coflex-F device and pedicle screw fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) surgeries by using finite element analysis. The results show that the Coflex-F device combined with ALIF surgery can provide stability similar to the pedicle screw fixation combined with TLIF or ALIF surgery. Also, the posterior instrumentations (Coflex-F and pedicle screw fixation) combined with TLIF surgery had lower stability than when combined with ALIF surgery.     

Biomechanical differences of Coflex-F and pedicle screw fixation combined with TLIF or ALIF – a finite element study

Lumbar interbody fusion is a common procedure for treating lower back pain related to degenerative disc diseases. The Coflex-F is a recently developed interspinous spacer, the makers of which claim that it can provide stabilisation similar to pedicle screw fixation. Therefore, this study compares the biomechanical behaviour of the Coflex-F device and pedicle screw fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) surgeries by using finite element analysis. The results show that the Coflex-F device combined with ALIF surgery can provide stability similar to the pedicle screw fixation combined with TLIF or ALIF surgery. Also, the posterior instrumentations (Coflex-F and pedicle screw fixation) combined with TLIF surgery had lower stability than when combined with ALIF surgery.     

微创经椎间孔及后路腰椎椎间融合术对腰椎滑脱症患者术后隐性失血的 影响

目的:探究微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)与后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)对腰椎滑脱症患者术后隐性失血的影响。方法:选取2014年03月~2014年08月腰椎滑脱症患者共48例,其中行MIS-TLIF术治疗患者23例,行PLIF术治疗患者25例,记录两组手术相关指标,及手术前后红细胞平均压积(Hct),依据Gross循环血量线性方程计算患者失血总量及隐性失血量,比较两组患者术后并发症情况。结果:MIS-TLIF组手术时间长于PLIF组(P0.05),而住院时间明显少于PLIF组(P0.05);MIS-TLIF组患者隐性失血量低于PLIF组(P0.05);MIS-TLIF组术后并发症发生率低于PLIF组(P0.05)。结论:与传统PLIF术式相比,MIS-TLIF治疗腰椎滑脱症具有隐性失血少,术后并发症少,恢复快的优点,值得临床推广。     

Biomechanical comparison of the effects of anterior,posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on vibration characteristics of the human lumbar spine

Previous studies have compared the effects of different interbody fusion approaches on biomechanical responses of the lumbar spine to static loadings. However, very few have dealt with the whole body vibration (WBV) condition that is typically present in vehicles. This study was designed to determine the biomechanical differences among anterior, posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF, PLIF and TLIF) under vertical WBV. A previously developed and validated finite element (FE) model of the intact L1–sacrum human lumbar spine was modified to simulate ALIF, PLIF and TLIF with bilateral pedicle screw fixation at L4–L5. Comparative studies on dynamic responses to the axial cyclic loading in these developed models were conducted. The results showed that at the fused L4–L5 level, dynamic responses of the von-Mises stress in L4 inferior and L5 superior endplates for the ALIF, PLIF and TLIF models were increased compared with the intact model. The endplate stresses in the TLIF model were lower than in the ALIF and PLIF models, but the TLIF generated greater stresses in the screws and rods compared with the ALIF and PLIF. At other levels, a decrease in dynamic responses of the disc bulge, annulus stress and intradiscal pressure was observed in all the fusion models compared with the intact one, but there was no obvious difference in these dynamic responses among the ALIF, PLIF and TLIF models. These findings might be useful in understanding vibration characteristics of the whole lumbar spine after different types of fusion surgery.     

Finite Element Analysis of Minimal Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

The purpose of our study is to develop and validate three-dimensional finite element models of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, and explore the most appropriate method of fixation and fusion by comparing biomechanical characteristics of different fixation method. We developed four fusion models: bilateral pedicle screws fixation with a single cage insertion model (A), bilateral pedicle screws fixation with two cages insertion model (B), unilateral pedicle screws fixation with a single cage insertion model (C), and unilateral pedicle screws fixation with two cages insertion model (D); the models were subjected to different forces including anterior bending, posterior extension, left bending, right bending, rotation, and axial compressive. The von Mises stress of the fusion segments on the pedicle screw and cages was recorded. Angular variation and stress of pedicle screw and cage were compared. There were differences of Von Mises peak stress among four models, but were within the range of maximum force. The angular variation in A, B, C, and D decreased significantly compared with normal. There was no significant difference of angular variation between A and B, and C and D. Bilateral pedicle screws fixation had more superior biomechanics than unilateral pedicle screws fixation. In conclusion, the lumbar interbody fusion models were established using varying fixation methods, and the results verified that unilateral pedicle screws fixation with a single cage could meet the stability demand in minimal invasive transforaminal interbody fusion.