Using formal concept analysis for microarray data comparison

Microarray technologies, which can measure tens of thousands of gene expression values simultaneously in a single experiment, have become a common research method for biomedical researchers. Computational tools to analyze microarray data for biological discovery are needed. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of using formal concept analysis (FCA) as a tool for microarray data analysis. The method of FCA builds a (concept) lattice from the experimental data together with additional biological information. For microarray data, each vertex of the lattice corresponds to a subset of genes that are grouped together according to their expression values and some biological information related to gene function. The lattice structure of these gene sets might reflect biological relationships in the dataset. Similarities and differences between experiments can then be investigated by comparing their corresponding lattices according to various graph measures. We apply our method to microarray data derived from influenza-infected mouse lung tissue and healthy controls. Our preliminary results show the promise of our method as a tool for microarray data analysis.     

Comparative evaluation of microarray analysis software

A wide variety of software tools are available to analyze microarray data. To identify the optimum software for any project, it is essential to define specific and essential criteria on which to evaluate the advantages of the key features. In this review we describe the results of our comparison of several software tools. We then conclude with a discussion of the subset of tools that are most commonly used and describe the features that would constitute the “ideal microarray analysis software suite.”     

Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays

MOTIVATION: Gene expression microarray experiments can generate data sets with multiple missing expression values. Unfortunately, many algorithms for gene expression analysis require a complete matrix of gene array values as input. For example, methods such as hierarchical clustering and K-means clustering are not robust to missing data, and may lose effectiveness even with a few missing values. Methods for imputing missing data are needed, therefore, to minimize the effect of incomplete data sets on analyses, and to increase the range of data sets to which these algorithms can be applied. In this report, we investigate automated methods for estimating missing data. RESULTS: We present a comparative study of several methods for the estimation of missing values in gene microarray data. We implemented and evaluated three methods: a Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) based method (SVDimpute), weighted K-nearest neighbors (KNNimpute), and row average. We evaluated the methods using a variety of parameter settings and over different real data sets, and assessed the robustness of the imputation methods to the amount of missing data over the range of 1--20% missing values. We show that KNNimpute appears to provide a more robust and sensitive method for missing value estimation than SVDimpute, and both SVDimpute and KNNimpute surpass the commonly used row average method (as well as filling missing values with zeros). We report results of the comparative experiments and provide recommendations and tools for accurate estimation of missing microarray data under a variety of conditions.     

Mixture modelling of gene expression data from microarray experiments

MOTIVATION: Hierarchical clustering is one of the major analytical tools for gene expression data from microarray experiments. A major problem in the interpretation of the output from these procedures is assessing the reliability of the clustering results. We address this issue by developing a mixture model-based approach for the analysis of microarray data. Within this framework, we present novel algorithms for clustering genes and samples. One of the byproducts of our method is a probabilistic measure for the number of true clusters in the data. RESULTS: The proposed methods are illustrated by application to microarray datasets from two cancer studies; one in which malignant melanoma is profiled (Bittner et al., Nature, 406, 536-540, 2000), and the other in which prostate cancer is profiled (Dhanasekaran et al., 2001, submitted).     

Of patterns and pathways: microarray technologies for the analysis of filamentous fungi

During recent years, microarrays have been firmly established as valuable tools for the discovery of novel biological phenomena. Especially in combination with whole genome sequences, microarray data can help unravel the dynamics of the expressed genome. For filamentous fungi, microarray studies have already been performed with more than 20 different species; these investigations have explored a variety of different aspects of fungal biology. In this review, I will give an overview of some of the key questions that have been addressed using microarray hybridizations with filamentous fungi, with particular focus on the analysis of co-regulated pathways and physically clustered genes, as well as on the use of microarray data to determine a molecular phenotype. Additionally, a number of useful, freely available software tools for the analysis of fungal microarray data will be discussed.     

Ontological analysis of gene expression data: current tools, limitations, and open problems

Independent of the platform and the analysis methods used, the result of a microarray experiment is, in most cases, a list of differentially expressed genes. An automatic ontological analysis approach has been recently proposed to help with the biological interpretation of such results. Currently, this approach is the de facto standard for the secondary analysis of high throughput experiments and a large number of tools have been developed for this purpose. We present a detailed comparison of 14 such tools using the following criteria: scope of the analysis, visualization capabilities, statistical model(s) used, correction for multiple comparisons, reference microarrays available, installation issues and sources of annotation data. This detailed analysis of the capabilities of these tools will help researchers choose the most appropriate tool for a given type of analysis. More importantly, in spite of the fact that this type of analysis has been generally adopted, this approach has several important intrinsic drawbacks. These drawbacks are associated with all tools discussed and represent conceptual limitations of the current state-of-the-art in ontological analysis. We propose these as challenges for the next generation of secondary data analysis tools.     

基因表达谱芯片的数据挖掘

随着基因芯片技术的迅速发展,表达谱芯片分析及aCGH等方法已被广泛应用于生命科学各个研究领域,由此产生的数据也呈指数级增长。如何从海量数据中获取有生物学意义的结果成为摆在生物学工作者面前的难题。对表达谱芯片数据挖掘方法进行了综述。介绍了基本分析思路,当前重点分析方向,如GO分析、pathway与调控网络分析、聚类分析等计算法则和相关几款易用的分析软件。并介绍了几种科学自由计算软件在表达谱生物信息学分析中的应用。藉此为从事芯片分析的研究人员提供参考。     

Normalization of microarray data: single-labeled and dual-labeled arrays

DNA microarray is a powerful tool for high-throughput analysis of biological systems. Various computational tools have been created to facilitate the analysis of the large volume of data produced in DNA microarray experiments. Normalization is a critical step for obtaining data that are reliable and usable for subsequent analysis such as identification of differentially expressed genes and clustering. A variety of normalization methods have been proposed over the past few years, but no methods are still perfect. Various assumptions are often taken in the process of normalization. Therefore, the knowledge of underlying assumption and principle of normalization would be helpful for the correct analysis of microarray data. We present a review of normalization techniques from single-labeled platforms such as the Affymetrix GeneChip array to dual-labeled platforms like spotted array focusing on their principles and assumptions.     

Microarray probe expression measures, data normalization and statistical validation

DNA microarray technology is a high-throughput method for gaining information on gene function. Microarray technology is based on deposition/synthesis, in an ordered manner, on a solid surface, of thousands of EST sequences/genes/oligonucleotides. Due to the high number of generated datapoints, computational tools are essential in microarray data analysis and mining to grasp knowledge from experimental results. In this review, we will focus on some of the methodologies actually available to define gene expression intensity measures, microarray data normalization, and statistical validation of differential expression.     

SpotWhatR: a user-friendly microarray data analysis system

SpotWhatR is a user-friendly microarray data analysis tool that runs under a widely and freely available R statistical language (http://www.r-project.org) for Windows and Linux operational systems. The aim of SpotWhatR is to help the researcher to analyze microarray data by providing basic tools for data visualization, normalization, determination of differentially expressed genes, summarization by Gene Ontology terms, and clustering analysis. SpotWhatR allows researchers who are not familiar with computational programming to choose the most suitable analysis for their microarray dataset. Along with well-known procedures used in microarray data analysis, we have introduced a stand-alone implementation of the HTself method, especially designed to find differentially expressed genes in low-replication contexts. This approach is more compatible with our local reality than the usual statistical methods. We provide several examples derived from the Blastocladiella emersonii and Xylella fastidiosa Microarray Projects. SpotWhatR is freely available at http://blasto.iq.usp.br/~tkoide/SpotWhatR, in English and Portuguese versions. In addition, the user can choose between "single experiment" and "batch processing" versions.     

The Stanford Microarray Database: data access and quality assessment tools

The Stanford Microarray Database (SMD; http://genome-www.stanford.edu/microarray/) serves as a microarray research database for Stanford investigators and their collaborators. In addition, SMD functions as a resource for the entire scientific community, by making freely available all of its source code and providing full public access to data published by SMD users, along with many tools to explore and analyze those data. SMD currently provides public access to data from 3500 microarrays, including data from 85 publications, and this total is increasing rapidly. In this article, we describe some of SMD's newer tools for accessing public data, assessing data quality and for data analysis.     

Microarray analysis: basic strategies for successful experiments

Microarrays offer a powerful approach to the analysis of gene expression that can be used for a wide variety of experimental purposes. However, there are several types of microarray platforms that are available. In addition, microarray experiments are expensive and generate complicated data sets that can be difficult to interpret. Success with microarray approaches requires a sound experimental design and a coordinated and appropriate use of statistical tools. Here, the advantages and pitfalls of utilizing microarrays are discussed, as are practical strategies to help novice users succeed with this method that can empower them with the ability to assay changes in gene expression at the whole genome level.     

Bivariate microarray analysis: statistical interpretation of two-channel functional genomics data

Conventional statistical methods for interpreting microarray data require large numbers of replicates in order to provide sufficient levels of sensitivity. We recently described a method for identifying differentially-expressed genes in one-channel microarray data 1. Based on the idea that the variance structure of microarray data can itself be a reliable measure of noise, this method allows statistically sound interpretation of as few as two replicates per treatment condition. Unlike the one-channel array, the two-channel platform simultaneously compares gene expression in two RNA samples. This leads to covariation of the measured signals. Hence, by accounting for covariation in the variance model, we can significantly increase the power of the statistical test. We believe that this approach has the potential to overcome limitations of existing methods. We present here a novel approach for the analysis of microarray data that involves modeling the variance structure of paired expression data in the context of a Bayesian framework. We also describe a novel statistical test that can be used to identify differentially-expressed genes. This method, bivariate microarray analysis (BMA), demonstrates dramatically improved sensitivity over existing approaches. We show that with only two array replicates, it is possible to detect gene expression changes that are at best detected with six array replicates by other methods. Further, we show that combining results from BMA with Gene Ontology annotation yields biologically significant results in a ligand-treated macrophage cell system.     

PATIKAmad: putting microarray data into pathway context

High-throughput experiments, most significantly DNA microarrays, provide us with system-scale profiles. Connecting these data with existing biological networks poses a formidable challenge to uncover facts about a cell's proteome. Studies and tools with this purpose are limited to networks with simple structure, such as protein-protein interaction graphs, or do not go much beyond than simply displaying values on the network. We have built a microarray data analysis tool, named PATIKAmad, which can be used to associate microarray data with the pathway models in mechanistic detail, and provides facilities for visualization, clustering, querying, and navigation of biological graphs related with loaded microarray experiments. PATIKAmad is freely available to noncommercial users as a new module of PATIKAweb at http://web.patika.org.     

Consolidated strategy for the analysis of microarray spike-in data

As the number of users of microarray technology continues to grow, so does the importance of platform assessments and comparisons. Spike-in experiments have been successfully used for internal technology assessments by microarray manufacturers and for comparisons of competing data analysis approaches. The microarray literature is saturated with statistical assessments based on spike-in experiment data. Unfortunately, the statistical assessments vary widely and are applicable only in specific cases. This has introduced confusion into the debate over best practices with regards to which platform, protocols and data analysis tools are best. Furthermore, cross-platform comparisons have proven difficult because reported concentrations are not comparable. In this article, we introduce two new spike-in experiments, present a novel statistical solution that enables cross-platform comparisons, and propose a comprehensive procedure for assessments based on spike-in experiments. The ideas are implemented in a user friendly Bioconductor package: spkTools. We demonstrated the utility of our tools by presenting the first spike-in-based comparison of the three major platforms–Affymetrix, Agilent and Illumina.