Community‐level vs species‐specific approaches to model selection

A topic of particular current interest is community‐level approaches to species distribution modelling (SDM), i.e. approaches that simultaneously analyse distributional data for multiple species. Previous studies have looked at the advantages of community‐level approaches for parameter estimation, but not for model selection – the process of choosing which model (and in particular, which subset of environmental variables) to fit to data. We compared the predictive performance of models using the same modelling method (generalised linear models) but choosing the subset of variables to include in the model either simultaneously across all species (community‐level model selection) or separately for each species (species‐specific model selection). Our results across two large presence/absence tree community datasets were inconclusive as to whether there was an overall difference in predictive performance between models fitted via species‐specific vs community‐level model selection. However, we found some evidence that a community approach was best suited to modelling rare species, and its performance decayed with increasing prevalence. That is, when data were sparse there was more opportunity for gains from “borrowing strength” across species via a community‐level approach. Interestingly, we also found that the community‐level approach tended to work better when the model selection problem was more difficult, and more reliably detected “noise” variables that should be excluded from the model.     

Powerful Exact Unconditional Tests for Agreement between Two Raters with Binary Endpoints

Asymptotic and exact conditional approaches have often been used for testing agreement between two raters with binary outcomes. The exact conditional approach is guaranteed to respect the test size as compared to the traditionally used asymptotic approach based on the standardized Cohen''s kappa coefficient. An alternative to the conditional approach is an unconditional strategy which relaxes the restriction of fixed marginal totals as in the conditional approach. Three exact unconditional hypothesis testing procedures are considered in this article: an approach based on maximization, an approach based on the conditional p-value and maximization, and an approach based on estimation and maximization. We compared these testing procedures based on the commonly used Cohen''s kappa with regards to test size and power. We recommend the following two exact approaches for use in practice due to power advantages: the approach based on conditional p-value and maximization and the approach based on estimation and maximization.     

Assessing the effect of prevalence on the predictive performance of species distribution models using simulated data

Aim The proportion of sampled sites where a species is present is known as prevalence. Empirical studies have shown that prevalence can affect the predictive performance of species distribution models. This paper uses simulated species data to examine how prevalence and the form of species environmental dependence affect the assessment of the predictive performance of models. Methods Simulated species data were based on various functions of simulated environmental data with differing degrees of spatial correlation. Seven model performance measures – sensitivity, specificity, class‐average (CA), overall prediction success, kappa (κ), normalized mutual information (NMI) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) – were applied to species models fitted by three regression methods. The response of the performance measures to prevalence was then assessed. Three probability threshold selection methods used to convert fitted logistic model values to presence or absence were also assessed. Results The study shows that the extent to which prevalence affects model performance depends on the modelling technique and its degree of success in capturing dominant environmental determinants. It also depends on the statistic used to measure model performance and the probability threshold method. The response based on κ generally preferred models with medium prevalence. All performance measures were least affected by prevalence when the probability threshold was chosen to maximize predictive performance or was based directly on prevalence. In these cases, the responses based on AUC, CA and NMI generally preferred models with small or large prevalence. Main conclusions The effect of prevalence on the predictive performance of species distribution models has a methodological basis. Relevant factors include the success of the fitted distribution model in capturing the dominant environmental determinant, the model performance measure and the probability threshold selection method. The fixed probability threshold method yields a marked response of model performance to prevalence and is therefore not recommended. The study explains previous empirical results obtained with real data.     

Comparison of approaches to combine species distribution models based on different sets of predictors

Distribution models should take into account the different limiting factors that simultaneously influence species ranges. Species distribution models built with different explanatory variables can be combined into more comprehensive ones, but the resulting models should maximize complementarity and avoid redundancy. Our aim was to compare the different methods available for combining species distribution models. We modelled 19 threatened vertebrate species in mainland Spain, producing models according to three individual explanatory factors: spatial constraints, topography and climate, and human influence. We used five approaches for model combination: Bayesian inference, Akaike weight averaging, stepwise variable selection, updating, and fuzzy logic. We compared the performance of these approaches by assessing different aspects of their classification and discrimination capacity. We demonstrated that different approaches to model combination give rise to disparities in the model outputs. Bayesian integration was systematically affected by an error in the equations that are habitually used in distribution modelling. Akaike weights produced models that were driven by the best single factor and therefore failed at combining the models effectively. The updating and the stepwise approaches shared recalibration as the basic concept for model combination, were very similar in their performance, and showed the highest sensitivity and discrimination capacity. The fuzzy‐logic approach yielded models with the highest classification capacity according to Cohen's kappa. In conclusion: 1) Bayesian integration, employing the currently used equation, and the Akaike weight procedure should be avoided; 2) the updating and stepwise approaches can be considered minor variants of the same recalibrating approach; and 3) there is a trade‐off between this recalibrating approach, which has the highest sensitivity, and fuzzy logic, which has the highest overall classification capacity. Recalibration is better if unfavourable conditions in one environmental factor may be counterbalanced with favourable conditions in a different factor, otherwise fuzzy logic is better.     

The iterative ensemble modelling approach increases the accuracy of fish distribution models

Methodological absences, i.e. when a species is not detected although it is actually present, are known to reduce the prediction accuracy of species distribution models (SDMs). To deal with this problem, we assessed whether a new iterative ensemble modelling (IEM) approach better predicts the spatial distribution of a set of 31 freshwater fish species, exhibiting a wide range of prevalence and methodological absences. Model efficiency was compared using one threshold‐independent (AUC) and three threshold‐dependent indicators of model predictive performance: the percentage of misclassified sites; the Kappa index; and the True Skill Statistic. We then reconstructed species assemblages from individual species predictions and compared observed assemblages to those predicted using EM and IEM using the Jaccard index. Compared to an EM approach, IEM improved model predictive performance for most difficult‐to‐detect species. The iterative approach outperformed EM at modelling the distribution of difficult‐to‐detect species, provided that presence data are representative of the niche of the species. At the assemblage level, the discrepancy between observed and IEM predicted assemblages was significantly lower than that between observed and EM predicted assemblages, showing that IEM can be used to predict the distribution of entire species assemblages. The IEM approach provides a way to consider difficult‐to‐detect species in species distribution models.     

On the selection of thresholds for predicting species occurrence with presence‐only data

Presence‐only data present challenges for selecting thresholds to transform species distribution modeling results into binary outputs. In this article, we compare two recently published threshold selection methods (maxSSS and maxF_pb) and examine the effectiveness of the threshold‐based prevalence estimation approach. Six virtual species with varying prevalence were simulated within a real landscape in southeastern Australia. Presence‐only models were built with DOMAIN, generalized linear model, Maxent, and Random Forest. Thresholds were selected with two methods maxSSS and maxF_pb with four presence‐only datasets with different ratios of the number of known presences to the number of random points (KP–RP_ratio). Sensitivity, specificity, true skill statistic, and F measure were used to evaluate the performance of the results. Species prevalence was estimated as the ratio of the number of predicted presences to the total number of points in the evaluation dataset. Thresholds selected with maxF_pb varied as the KP–RP_ratio of the threshold selection datasets changed. Datasets with the KP–RP_ratio around 1 generally produced better results than scores distant from 1. Results produced by We conclude that maxF_pb had specificity too low for very common species using Random Forest and Maxent models. In contrast, maxSSS produced consistent results whichever dataset was used. The estimation of prevalence was almost always biased, and the bias was very large for DOMAIN and Random Forest predictions. We conclude that maxF_pb is affected by the KP–RP_ratio of the threshold selection datasets, but maxSSS is almost unaffected by this ratio. Unbiased estimations of prevalence are difficult to be determined using the threshold‐based approach.     

Ensemble modelling of species distribution: the effects of geographical and environmental ranges

The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of species geographical and environmental ranges on the predictive performances of species distribution models (SDMs). We explored the usefulness of ensemble modelling approaches and tested whether species attributes influenced the outcomes of such approaches. Eight SDMs were used to model the current distribution of 35 fish species at 1110 stream sections in France. We first quantified the consensus among the resulting set of predictions for each fish species. Next, we created an average model by taking the average of the individual model predictions and tested whether the average model improved the predictive performances of single SDMs. Lastly, we described the ranges of fish species along four gradients: latitudinal, thermal, stream gradient (i.e. upstream‐downstream) and elevation. After accounting for the effects of phylogenetic relatedness and species prevalence, these four species attributes were related to the observed variations in both consensus among SDMs and predictive performances by using generalized estimation equations. Our results highlight the usefulness of ensemble approaches for identifying geographical areas of agreement among predictions. Although the geographical extent of species had no effect on the performances of SDMs, we demonstrated that more consensual and accurate predictions were obtained for species with low thermal and elevation ranges, validating the hypothesis that specialist species yield models with higher accuracy than generalist ones. We emphasized that significant improvements in the accuracy of SDMs can be achieved by using an average model. Furthermore, these improvements were higher for species with smaller ranges along the four gradients studied. The geographical extent and ranges of species along environmental gradients provide promising insights into our understanding of uncertainties in species distribution modelling.     

Practical tool for landscape planning? An empirical investigation of network based models of habitat fragmentation

This study presents a graph-theoretical modelling approach using daily movements and habitat demands of different target bird species in an urban context to assess: 1) habitable land cover types, 2) threshold distances between patches of habitat, 3) the required minimum accessible habitat areas and 4) the effects of barriers and stepping stones. The modelling approach is tested using empirical data from field surveys in the urban area of Stockholm, Sweden.
The results show that groups of small habitat patches can house the same species as larger contiguous patches as long as they are perceived as functionally connected by the inhabitant organisms. Furthermore, we found that binary habitat/non-habitat representations of the landscape could roughly explain the variation in species occurrence, as long as habitat was properly defined. However, the explanatory power of the landscape models increased when features of matrix heterogeneity such as stepping stones and barriers were accounted for.
Synthesis and application: in a world where forest ecosystems are becoming increasingly fragmented there is an urgent need to find comprehensive and scientifically relevant methods for managing and planning ecosystems. This study shows that: 1) groups of well placed small habitat patches can, together, be sufficient to attract birds in intensively developed areas, 2) the presented modelling approach can help identify such groups of patches, 3) matrix heterogeneity should preferably be accounted for, and 4) proper assessments of habitable land cover types are important. Finally, we argue that the modelling approach applied here may substantially improve landscape management and planning at scales ranging from whole landscapes down to neighbourhoods.     

Modelling cross-hybridization on phylogenetic DNA microarrays increases the detection power of closely related species

DNA microarrays are a popular technique for the detection of microorganisms. Several approaches using specific oligomers targeting one or a few marker genes for each species have been proposed. Data analysis is usually limited to call a species present when its oligomer exceeds a certain intensity threshold. While this strategy works reasonably well for distantly related species, it does not work well for very closely related species: Cross-hybridization of nontarget DNA prevents a simple identification based on signal intensity. The majority of species of the same genus has a sequence similarity of over 90%. For biodiversity studies down to the species level, it is therefore important to increase the detection power of closely related species. We propose a simple, cost-effective and robust approach for biodiversity studies using DNA microarray technology and demonstrate it on scenedesmacean green algae. The internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) rDNA sequence was chosen as marker because it is suitable to distinguish all eukaryotic species even though parts of it are virtually identical in closely related species. We show that by modelling hybridization behaviour with a matrix algebra approach, we are able to identify closely related species that cannot be distinguished with a threshold on signal intensity. Thus this proof-of-concept study shows that by adding a simple and robust data analysis step to the evaluation of DNA microarrays, species detection can be significantly improved for closely related species with a high sequence similarity.     

Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data

A modelling framework for studying the combined effects of climate and land-cover changes on the distribution of species is presented. The model integrates land-cover data into a correlative bioclimatic model in a scale-dependent hierarchical manner, whereby Artificial Neural Networks are used to characterise species' climatic requirements at the European scale and land-cover requirements at the British scale. The model has been tested against an alternative non-hierarchical approach and has been applied to four plant species in Britain: Rhynchospora alba , Erica tetralix , Salix herbacea and Geranium sylvaticum . Predictive performance has been evaluated using Cohen's Kappa statistic and the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, and a novel approach to identifying thresholds of occurrence which utilises three levels of confidence has been applied. Results demonstrate reasonable to good predictive performance for each species, with the main patterns of distribution simulated at both 10 km and 1 km resolutions. The incorporation of land-cover data was found to significantly improve purely climate-driven predictions for R. alba and E. tetralix , enabling regions with suitable climate but unsuitable land-cover to be identified. The study thus provides an insight into the roles of climate and land-cover as determinants of species' distributions and it is demonstrated that the modelling approach presented can provide a useful framework for making predictions of distributions under scenarios of changing climate and land-cover type. The paper confirms the potential utility of multi-scale approaches for understanding environmental limitations to species' distributions, and demonstrates that the search for environmental correlates with species' distributions must be addressed at an appropriate spatial scale. Our study contributes to the mounting evidence that hierarchical schemes are characteristic of ecological systems.     

Model-based uncertainty in species range prediction

Aim Many attempts to predict the potential range of species rely on environmental niche (or ‘bioclimate envelope’) modelling, yet the effects of using different niche‐based methodologies require further investigation. Here we investigate the impact that the choice of model can have on predictions, identify key reasons why model output may differ and discuss the implications that model uncertainty has for policy‐guiding applications. Location The Western Cape of South Africa. Methods We applied nine of the most widely used modelling techniques to model potential distributions under current and predicted future climate for four species (including two subspecies) of Proteaceae. Each model was built using an identical set of five input variables and distribution data for 3996 sampled sites. We compare model predictions by testing agreement between observed and simulated distributions for the present day (using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and kappa statistics) and by assessing consistency in predictions of range size changes under future climate (using cluster analysis). Results Our analyses show significant differences between predictions from different models, with predicted changes in range size by 2030 differing in both magnitude and direction (e.g. from 92% loss to 322% gain). We explain differences with reference to two characteristics of the modelling techniques: data input requirements (presence/absence vs. presence‐only approaches) and assumptions made by each algorithm when extrapolating beyond the range of data used to build the model. The effects of these factors should be carefully considered when using this modelling approach to predict species ranges. Main conclusions We highlight an important source of uncertainty in assessments of the impacts of climate change on biodiversity and emphasize that model predictions should be interpreted in policy‐guiding applications along with a full appreciation of uncertainty.     

Combining physiological threshold knowledge to species distribution models is key to improving forecasts of the future niche for macroalgae

Species distribution models (SDM) are a useful tool for predicting species range shifts in response to global warming. However, they do not explore the mechanisms underlying biological processes, making it difficult to predict shifts outside the environmental gradient where the model was trained. In this study, we combine correlative SDMs and knowledge on physiological limits to provide more robust predictions. The thermal thresholds obtained in growth and survival experiments were used as proxies of the fundamental niches of two foundational marine macrophytes. The geographic projections of these species’ distributions obtained using these thresholds and existing SDMs were similar in areas where the species are either absent‐rare or frequent and where their potential and realized niches match, reaching consensus predictions. The cold‐temperate foundational seaweed Himanthalia elongata was predicted to become extinct at its southern limit in northern Spain in response to global warming, whereas the occupancy of southern‐lusitanic Bifurcaria bifurcata was expected to increase. Combined approaches such as this one may also highlight geographic areas where models disagree potentially due to biotic factors. Physiological thresholds alone tended to over‐predict species prevalence, as they cannot identify absences in climatic conditions within the species’ range of physiological tolerance or at the optima. Although SDMs tended to have higher sensitivity than threshold models, they may include regressions that do not reflect causal mechanisms, constraining their predictive power. We present a simple example of how combining correlative and mechanistic knowledge provides a rapid way to gain insight into a species’ niche resulting in consistent predictions and highlighting potential sources of uncertainty in forecasted responses to climate change.     

The concept of threshold and its potential application to landscape planning

The concept of threshold can potentially be applied to conservation planning of species, habitats, and ecosystems. It also has significance in managing social–ecological systems for resilience. However, our understanding and use of threshold has been scattered among various disciplines, and the link to conservation planning and social–ecological system management has not been strongly established. The review of the use of threshold in various disciplines reveals that the term is used in a similar manner in both natural and social sciences: a threshold is a point or a zone on an independent variable, and if it is crossed, a sudden, large change in the state of a dependent variable occurs. Even a small change in the independent variable brings this drastic change; nonlinear relationship characterizes the threshold response. Thresholds also separate alternative regimes in a social–ecological system. The discussion of the application of threshold concept to watershed planning concludes that although using one threshold value of impervious surfaces in a watershed to regulate new developments and retrofit old ones is a cost-effective method, a more integrated approach is needed. The use of habitat amount threshold to conserve species promotes proactive planning that would prioritize areas for protection before the threshold is reached and would restore habitat based on the threshold target. However, species-specific data to decide on the threshold is often lacking, and the identification of thresholds is not straightforward. Nonetheless, the concept of threshold is appealing for proactive planning and significant in managing social–ecological systems for resilience.     

Predicting species distributions: a critical comparison of the most common statistical models using artificial species

Aim To test statistical models used to predict species distributions under different shapes of occurrence–environment relationship. We addressed three questions: (1) Is there a statistical technique that has a consistently higher predictive ability than others for all kinds of relationships? (2) How does species prevalence influence the relative performance of models? (3) When an automated stepwise selection procedure is used, does it improve predictive modelling, and are the relevant variables being selected? Location We used environmental data from a real landscape, the state of California, and simulated species distributions within this landscape. Methods Eighteen artificial species were generated, which varied in their occurrence response to the environmental gradients considered (random, linear, Gaussian, threshold or mixed), in the interaction of those factors (no interaction vs. multiplicative), and on their prevalence (50% vs. 5%). The landscape was then randomly sampled with a large (n = 2000) or small (n = 150) sample size, and the predictive ability of each statistical approach was assessed by comparing the true and predicted distributions using five different indexes of performance (area under the receiver‐operator characteristic curve, Kappa, correlation between true and predictive probability of occurrence, sensitivity and specificity). We compared generalized additive models (GAM) with and without flexible degrees of freedom, logistic regressions (general linear models, GLM) with and without variable selection, classification trees, and the genetic algorithm for rule‐set production (GARP). Results Species with threshold and mixed responses, additive environmental effects, and high prevalence generated better predictions than did other species for all statistical models. In general, GAM outperforms all other strategies, although differences with GLM are usually not significant. The two variable‐selection strategies presented here did not discriminate successfully between truly causal factors and correlated environmental variables. Main conclusions Based on our analyses, we recommend the use of GAM or GLM over classification trees or GARP, and the specification of any suspected interaction terms between predictors. An expert‐based variable selection procedure was preferable to the automated procedures used here. Finally, for low‐prevalence species, variability in model performance is both very high and sample‐dependent. This suggests that distribution models for species with low prevalence can be improved through targeted sampling.     

Distribution models of estuarine fish species: The effect of sampling bias,species ecology and threshold selection on models' accuracy

Species distribution models (SDMs) relate presence/absence data to environmental variables, allowing to predict species environmental requirements and potential distribution. They have been increasingly used in fields such as ecology, biogeography and evolution, and often support conservation priorities and strategies. Thus, it becomes crucial to understand how trustworthy and reliable their predictions are. Different approaches, such as using ensemble methods (combining forecasts of different single models), or applying the most suitable threshold to transform continuous probability maps into species presences or absences, have been used to reduce model-based uncertainty. Taking into account the influence of biased sampling imprecision in species location, small datasets and species ecological characteristics, may also help to detect and compensate for uncertainty in the model building process. To investigate the effect of applying an ensemble approach, several threshold selection criteria and different datasets representing seasonal and spatial sampling bias, on models' accuracy, SDMs were built for four estuarine fish species with distinct use of the estuarine systems. Overall, predictions obtained with the ensemble approach were more accurate. Variability in accuracy metrics obtained with the nine threshold selection criteria applied was more pronounced for species with low prevalence and when sensitivity was calculated. Higher values of accuracy measures were registered with the threshold that maximizes the sum of sensitivity and specificity, and the threshold where the predicted prevalence equals the observed, whereas the 0.5 cut-off was unreliable, originating the lowest values for these metrics. Accuracy of models created from a spatially biased sampling was overall higher than accuracy of models created with a seasonally biased sampling or with the multi-year database created and this pattern was consistently obtained for marine migrant species, which use estuaries as nursery areas, presenting a seasonally and regular use of these ecosystems. The ecological dependence between these fish species and estuaries may add difficulties in the model building process, and needs to be taken into account, to improve their accuracy. The present study highlights the need for a thorough analysis of the critical underlying issues of the complete model building process to predict the distribution of estuarine fish species, due to the particular and dynamic nature of these ecosystems.     

Ecological thresholds: an assessment of methods to identify abrupt changes in species–habitat relationships

Habitat thresholds are usually defined as “points of abrupt change” in the species–habitat relationships. Habitat thresholds can be a key tool for understanding species requirements, and provide an objective definition of conservation targets, by identifying when habitat loss leads to a rapid loss of species, and the minimum amount of habitat necessary for species persistence. However, a large variety of statistical methods have been used to analyse them. In this context, we reviewed these methods and, using simulated data sets, we tested the main models to compare their performance on the identification of thresholds. We show that researchers use very different analytical tools, corresponding to different operational definitions of habitat thresholds, which can considerably affect their detection. Piecewise regression and generalized additive models allow both the distinction between linear and nonlinear dynamics, and the correct identification of break point position. In contrast, other methods such as logistic regression fail because they may incorrectly detect thresholds in gradual patterns, or they may over or underestimate the threshold position. In conservation or habitat modelling, it is important to focus efforts efficiently and the inappropriate choice of statistical methods may have detrimental consequences.     

Computer modelling of kappa carrageenam-mannan interactions

Molecular modelling has been used as a theoretical approach to investigate the kappa carrageenan structure and its interaction with mannan chains. Calculations revealed the existence of six minima for the kappa carrageenan structure in solution. Two of them were very close to the structure found in the solid state. The methodology allowed the calculation of the theoretical counterpart of the structures based on x-ray fibre diffractions studies. In the second step of this study, we have shown that there is the possibility of interactions between kappa carrageenan double helices and mannan chains. This interacting process is allowed by the flexibility of the mannan chains and structural changes of the kappa carrageenan double helices. The calculations suggest that the disaccaride mannan fragment might be required for recognition. The result of our investigation are in good agreement with a model of gel structure based on experimental data. This approach could be applied to simulate and predict other associations in molecular assemblies.     

A micromechanical model to predict damage and failure in biological tissues. Application to the ligament-to-bone attachment in the human knee joint

Computational models are developed in injury biomechanics to assess lesions in biological tissues based on mechanical measurements. The linear mechanics of fracture theory (LMFT) is a common approach to establish injuries based on thresholds (such as force or strain thresholds) which are straightforward to implement and computationally efficient. However, LMFT does not apply to non-linear heterogeneous materials and does not have the ability to predict failure onset. This paper proposes the cohesive zone model theory (CZMT) as an alternative. CZMT focuses on the development of behaviour laws for crack initiation and propagation at an interface that apply within a fibrous material or at the interface between materials. With the view of evaluating CZMT for biological tissues, the model developed by Raous et al. [1999. A consistent model coupling adhesion, friction and unilateral contact. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 177, 383–399] was applied to the ligament-to-bone interface in the human knee joint. This model accounts for adhesion, friction and damage at the interface and provides a smooth transition from total adhesion to complete failure through the intensity of adhesion variable. A 2D finite element model was developed to mimic previous experiments, and the model parameters were determined using a dichotomy method. The model showed good results by its ability to predict damage. The extension to a 3D geometry, with an inverse problem approach, is, however, required to better estimate the model parameters values. Although it is computationally costly, CZMT supplements the improvements achieved in microimaging techniques to support the development of micro/macro approaches in biomechanical modelling.     

When the method for mapping species matters: defining priority areas for conservation of African freshwater turtles

Aim Defining priority areas for conservation is essential to minimize biodiversity loss, but the adoption of different methods for describing species distributions influences the outcomes. In order to provide a robust basis for the conservation of freshwater turtles in Africa, we compared the effect that different species‐mapping approaches had on derived patterns of species richness, species vulnerability and protected‐area representativeness. Location Africa. Methods We adopted three different approaches with increasing complexity for generating species distribution maps. The first approach was based on the geographic intersection of species records and grid squares; the second on the union of local convex polygons; and the third on inductive distribution modelling techniques. We used distribution maps, generated using these three approaches, to determine conservation priorities based on geographic patterns of species richness and vulnerability, as well as for conducting gap and irreplaceability analyses. Results We obtained markedly different distribution maps using the three methods, which in turn caused differences in conservation priorities. The grid‐square approach underestimated range sizes and species richness, while the polygon approach overestimated these attributes. The distribution modelling approach provided the most realistic outcome in terms of diversity patterns, by minimizing both commission and omission errors. An integrated map of conservation priority – derived by combining individual measures of priority based on the distribution modelling approach – identified the Gulf of Guinea coast and the Albertine Rift as major priority areas. Main conclusions Each species‐mapping approach has both advantages and disadvantages. The choice of the most appropriate approach in any given situation depends on the availability of locality records and on the relative importance of mitigating omission and commission errors. Our findings suggest that in most circumstances, the use of distribution modelling has many advantages relative to the other approaches. The priority areas identified in this study should be considered for targeting efforts to conserve Africa freshwater turtles in the coming years.     

How well does presence‐only‐based species distribution modelling predict assemblage diversity? A case study of the Tenerife flora

Prediction error is considered an important problem in species distribution models. To address this issue, we here examined the accuracy of overlays of presence‐only‐based models for many individual species in representing patterns of assemblage diversity. For this purpose, we used a database of 977 160 records of seed plant occurrences on an intensively surveyed, species‐rich island (Tenerife, Canary Islands) for modelling the distribution of all its 841 native plant species individually. The modelling was done using Maxent, one of the best‐performing presence‐only modelling techniques, using various thresholds to convert the estimated suitability values into predicted presence or absence. Distribution models for each individual species were overlaid to predict species richness and composition, which were then compared to the observed values for well‐surveyed grid cells. We found high levels of compositional error, when the best performing suitability threshold for predicting species richness was applied. Our best prediction had a mean species richness error of 24% and a mean compositional error of 60% relative to the observed values for the well‐surveyed cells; >50% of all species were included erroneously in >25% of the well‐surveyed cells. Hence, large quantities of data are not necessarily enough to obtain reliable predictions of assemblage diversity, limiting the usefulness of this methodology in conservation planning.