The antibiotic viomycin traps the ribosome in an intermediate state of translocation

During protein synthesis, transfer RNA and messenger RNA undergo coupled translocation through the ribosome's A, P and E sites, a process catalyzed by elongation factor EF-G. Viomycin blocks translocation on bacterial ribosomes and is believed to bind at the subunit interface. Using fluorescent resonance energy transfer and chemical footprinting, we show that viomycin traps the ribosome in an intermediate state of translocation. Changes in FRET efficiency show that viomycin causes relative movement of the two ribosomal subunits indistinguishable from that induced by binding of EF-G with GDPNP. Chemical probing experiments indicate that viomycin induces formation of a hybrid-state translocation intermediate. Thus, viomycin inhibits translation through a unique mechanism, locking ribosomes in the hybrid state; the EF-G-induced 'ratcheted' state observed by cryo-EM is identical to the hybrid state; and, since translation is viomycin sensitive, the hybrid state may be present in vivo.     

Intramolecular Movements in EF-G, Trapped at Different Stages in Its GTP Hydrolytic Cycle, Probed by FRET

Elongation factor G (EF-G) is one of several GTP hydrolytic proteins (GTPases) that cycles repeatedly on and off the ribosome during protein synthesis in bacterial cells. In the functional cycle of EF-G, hydrolysis of guanosine 5′-triphosphate (GTP) is coupled to tRNA-mRNA translocation in ribosomes. GTP hydrolysis induces conformational rearrangements in two switch elements in the G domain of EF-G and other GTPases. These switch elements are thought to initiate the cascade of events that lead to translocation and EF-G cycling between ribosomes. To further define the coupling mechanism, we developed a new fluorescent approach that can detect intramolecular movements in EF-G. We attached a fluorescent probe to the switch I element (sw1) of Escherichia coli EF-G. We monitored the position of the sw1 probe, relative to another fluorescent probe anchored to the GTP substrate or product, by measuring the distance-dependent, Förster resonance energy transfer between the two probes. By analyzing EF-G trapped at five different functional states in its cycle, we could infer the cyclical movements of sw1 within EF-G. Our results provide evidence for conformational changes in sw1, which help to drive the unidirectional EF-G cycle during protein synthesis. More generally, our approach might also serve to define the conformational dynamics of other GTPases with their cellular receptors.     

Spontaneous intersubunit rotation in single ribosomes

During the elongation cycle, tRNA and mRNA undergo coupled translocation through the ribosome catalyzed by elongation factor G (EF-G). Cryo-EM reconstructions of certain EF-G-containing complexes led to the proposal that the mechanism of translocation involves rotational movement between the two ribosomal subunits. Here, using single-molecule FRET, we observe that pretranslocation ribosomes undergo spontaneous intersubunit rotational movement in the absence of EF-G, fluctuating between two conformations corresponding to the classical and hybrid states of the translocational cycle. In contrast, posttranslocation ribosomes are fixed predominantly in the classical, nonrotated state. Movement of the acceptor stem of deacylated tRNA into the 50S E site and EF-G binding to the ribosome both contribute to stabilization of the rotated, hybrid state. Furthermore, the acylation state of P site tRNA has a dramatic effect on the frequency of intersubunit rotation. Our results provide direct evidence that the intersubunit rotation that underlies ribosomal translocation is thermally driven.     

Comparing FRET Pairs that Report on Intersubunit Rotation in Bacterial Ribosomes

Mediated by elongation factor G (EF-G), ribosome translocation along mRNA is accompanied by rotational movement between ribosomal subunits. Here, we reassess whether the intersubunit rotation requires GTP hydrolysis by EF-G or can occur spontaneously. To that end, we employ two independent FRET assays, which are based on labeling either ribosomal proteins (bS6 and bL9) or rRNAs (h44 of 16S and H101 of 23S rRNA). Both FRET pairs reveal three FRET states, corresponding to the non-rotated, rotated and semi-rotated conformations of the ribosome. Both FRET assays show that in the absence of EF-G, pre-translocation ribosomes containing deacylated P-site tRNA undergo spontaneous intersubunit rotations between non-rotated and rotated conformations. While the two FRET pairs exhibit largely similar behavior, they substantially differ in the fraction of ribosomes showing spontaneous fluctuations. Nevertheless, instead of being an invariable intrinsic property of each FRET pair, the fraction of spontaneously fluctuating molecules changes in both FRET assays depending on experimental conditions. Our results underscore importance of using multiple FRET pairs in studies of ribosome dynamics and highlight the role of thermally-driven large-scale ribosome rearrangements in translation.     

The ribosome as a molecular machine: the mechanism of tRNA-mRNA movement in translocation

Translocation of tRNA and mRNA through the ribosome is one of the most dynamic events during protein synthesis. In the cell, translocation is catalysed by EF-G (elongation factor G) and driven by GTP hydrolysis. Major unresolved questions are: how the movement is induced and what the moving parts of the ribosome are. Recent progress in time-resolved cryoelectron microscopy revealed trajectories of tRNA movement through the ribosome. Driven by thermal fluctuations, the ribosome spontaneously samples a large number of conformational states. The spontaneous movement of tRNAs through the ribosome is loosely coupled to the motions within the ribosome. EF-G stabilizes conformational states prone to translocation and promotes a conformational rearrangement of the ribosome (unlocking) that accelerates the rate-limiting step of translocation: the movement of the tRNA anticodons on the small ribosomal subunit. EF-G acts as a Brownian ratchet providing directional bias for movement at the cost of GTP hydrolysis.     

Conformational changes in switch I of EF‐G drive its directional cycling on and off the ribosome

We have trapped elongation factor G (EF-G) from Escherichia coli in six, functionally defined states, representing intermediates in its unidirectional catalytic cycle, which couples GTP hydrolysis to tRNA–mRNA translocation in the ribosome. By probing EF-G with trypsin in each state, we identified a substantial conformational change involving its conserved switch I (sw1) element, which contacts the GTP substrate. By attaching FeBABE (a hydroxyl radical generating probe) to sw1, we could monitor sw1 movement (by ∼20 Å), relative to the 70S ribosome, during the EF-G cycle. In free EF-G, sw1 is disordered, particularly in GDP-bound and nucleotide-free states. On EF-G•GTP binding to the ribosome, sw1 becomes structured and tucked inside the ribosome, thereby locking GTP onto EF-G. After hydrolysis and translocation, sw1 flips out from the ribosome, greatly accelerating release of GDP and EF-G from the ribosome. Collectively, our results support a central role of sw1 in driving the EF-G cycle during protein synthesis.     

The A-site finger in 23 S rRNA acts as a functional attenuator for translocation

Helix 38 (H38) in 23 S rRNA, which is known as the "A-site finger (ASF)," is located in the intersubunit space of the ribosomal 50 S subunit and, together with protein S13 in the 30 S subunit, it forms bridge B1a. It is known that throughout the decoding process, ASF interacts directly with the A-site tRNA. Bridge B1a becomes disrupted by the ratchet-like rotation of the 30 S subunit relative to the 50 S subunit. This occurs in association with elongation factor G (EF-G)-catalyzed translocation. To further characterize the functional role(s) of ASF, variants of Escherichia coli ribosomes with a shortened ASF were constructed. The E. coli strain bearing such ASF-shortened ribosomes had a normal growth rate but enhanced +1 frameshift activity. ASF-shortened ribosomes showed normal subunit association but higher activity in poly(U)-dependent polyphenylalanine synthesis than the wild type (WT) ribosome at limited EF-G concentrations. In contrast, other ribosome variants with shortened bridge-forming helices 34 and 68 showed weak subunit association and less efficient translational activity than the WT ribosome. Thus, the higher translational activity of ASF-shortened ribosomes is caused by the disruption of bridge B1a and is not due to weakened subunit association. Single round translocation analyses clearly demonstrated that the ASF-shortened ribosomes have higher translocation activity than the WT ribosome. These observations indicate that the intrinsic translocation activity of ribosomes is greater than that usually observed in the WT ribosome and that ASF is a functional attenuator for translocation that serves to maintain the reading frame.     

Interaction of the G' domain of elongation factor G and the C-terminal domain of ribosomal protein L7/L12 during translocation as revealed by cryo-EM

During tRNA translocation on the ribosome, an arc-like connection (ALC) is formed between the G' domain of elongation factor G (EF-G) and the L7/L12-stalk base of the large ribosomal subunit in the GDP state. To delineate the boundary of EF-G within the ALC, we tagged an amino acid residue near the tip of the G' domain of EF-G with undecagold, which was then visualized with three-dimensional cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). Two distinct positions for the undecagold, observed in the GTP-state and GDP-state cryo-EM maps of the ribosome bound EF-G, allowed us to determine the movement of the labeled amino acid. Molecular analyses of the cryo-EM maps show: (1) that three structural components, the N-terminal domain of ribosomal protein L11, the C-terminal domain of ribosomal protein L7/L12, and the G' domain of EF-G, participate in formation of the ALC; and (2) that both EF-G and the ribosomal protein L7/L12 undergo large conformational changes to form the ALC.     

Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters for tRNA binding to the ribosome and for the translocation reaction.

Kinetic analyses of tRNA binding to the ribosome and of the translocation reaction showed the following results. 1) The activation energy for the P site binding of AcPhe-tRNA to poly(U)-programmed ribosomes is relatively high (Ea = 72 kJ mol-1; 15 mM Mg2+). If only the P site is occupied with deacylated tRNA(Phe), then the E site can be filled more easily with tRNA(Phe) (no activation energy measurable) than the A site with AcPhe-tRNA (Ea = 47 kJ mol-1; 15 mM Mg2+). 2) A ribosome with blocked P and E sites represents a standard state of the elongation cycle, in contrast to a ribosome with only a filled P site. The two states differ in that AcPhe-tRNA binding to the A site of a ribosome with prefilled P and E sites requires much higher activation energy (87 versus 47 kJ mol-1). The latter reaction simulates the allosteric transition from the post- to the pretranslocational state, whereby the tRNA(Phe) is released from the E site upon occupation of the A site (Rheinberger, H.-J., and Nierhaus, K. H. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 9133-9139). The reversed transition from the pre- to the posttranslocational state (translocation reaction) requires about the same activation energy (90 kJ mol-1). 3) Both elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-G drastically reduce the respective activation energies. 4) The rate of the A site occupation is slower than the rate of translocation in the presence of the respective elongation factors. The data suggest that the A site occupation rather than, as generally assumed, the translocation reaction is the rate-limiting step of the elongation cycle.     

Observation of intersubunit movement of the ribosome in solution using FRET

Protein synthesis is believed to be a dynamic process, involving structural rearrangements of the ribosome. Cryo-EM reconstructions of certain elongation factor G (EF-G)-containing complexes have led to the proposal that translocation of tRNA and mRNA through the ribosome, from the A to P to E sites, is accompanied by a rotational movement between the two ribosomal subunits. Here, we have used F?rster resonance energy transfer (FRET) to monitor changes in the relative orientation of the ribosomal subunits in different complexes trapped at intermediate stages of translocation in solution. Binding of EF-G to the ribosome in the presence of the non-hydrolyzable GTP analogue GDPNP or GTP plus fusidic acid causes an increase in the efficiency of energy transfer between fluorophores introduced into proteins S11 in the 30 S subunit and L9 in the 50 S subunit, and a decrease in energy transfer between S6 and L9. Similar anti-correlated changes in energy transfer occur upon binding the GTP-requiring release factor RF3. These changes are consistent with the counter-clockwise rotation of the 30 S subunit relative to the 50 S subunit observed in cryo-EM studies. Reaction of ribosomal complexes containing the peptidyl-tRNA analogues N-Ac-Phe-tRNAPhe, N-Ac-Met-tRNAMet or f-Met-tRNAfMet with puromycin, conditions favoring movement of the resulting deacylated tRNAs into the P/E hybrid state, leads to similar changes in FRET. Conversely, treatment of a ribosomal complex containing deacylated and peptidyl-tRNAs bound in the A/P and P/E states, respectively, with EF-G.GTP causes reversal of the FRET changes. The use of FRET has enabled direct observation of intersubunit movement in solution, provides independent evidence that formation of the hybrid state is coupled to rotation of the 30 S subunit and shows that the intersubunit movement is reversed during the second step of translocation.     

Antibiotics that bind to the A site of the large ribosomal subunit can induce mRNA translocation

In the absence of elongation factor EF-G, ribosomes undergo spontaneous, thermally driven fluctuation between the pre-translocation (classical) and intermediate (hybrid) states of translocation. These fluctuations do not result in productive mRNA translocation. Extending previous findings that the antibiotic sparsomycin induces translocation, we identify additional peptidyl transferase inhibitors that trigger productive mRNA translocation. We find that antibiotics that bind the peptidyl transferase A site induce mRNA translocation, whereas those that do not occupy the A site fail to induce translocation. Using single-molecule FRET, we show that translocation-inducing antibiotics do not accelerate intersubunit rotation, but act solely by converting the intrinsic, thermally driven dynamics of the ribosome into translocation. Our results support the idea that the ribosome is a Brownian ratchet machine, whose intrinsic dynamics can be rectified into unidirectional translocation by ligand binding.     

Interactions of translational factor EF-G with the bacterial ribosome before and after mRNA translocation

A conserved translation factor, known as EF-G in bacteria, promotes the translocation of tRNA and mRNA in the ribosome during protein synthesis. Here, EF-G.ribosome complexes in two intermediate states, before and after mRNA translocation, have been probed with hydroxyl radicals generated from free Fe(II)-EDTA. Before mRNA translocation and GTP hydrolysis, EF-G protected a limited set of nucleotides in both subunits of the ribosome from cleavage by hydroxyl radicals. In this state, an extensive set of nucleotides, in the platform and head domains of the 30S subunit and in the L7/L12 stalk region of the 50S subunit, became more exposed to hydroxyl radical attack, suggestive of conformational changes in these domains. Following mRNA translocation, EF-G protected a larger set of nucleotides (23S rRNA helices H43, H44, H89, and H95; 16S rRNA helices h5 and h15). No nucleotide with enhanced reactivity to hydroxyl radicals was detected in this latter state. Both before and after mRNA translocation, EF-G protected identical nucleotides in h5 and h15 of the 30S subunit. These results suggest that h5 and h15 may remain associated with EF-G during the dynamic course of the translocation mechanism. Nucleotides in H43 and H44 of the 50S subunit were protected only after translocation and GTP hydrolysis, suggesting that these helices interact dynamically with EF-G. The effects in H95 suggest that EF-G interacts weakly with H95 before mRNA translocation and strongly and more extensively with this helix following mRNA translocation.     

Ribosome recycling factor disassembles the post-termination ribosomal complex independent of the ribosomal translocase activity of elongation factor G

Ribosome recycling factor (RRF) disassembles post-termination ribosomal complexes in concert with elongation factor EF-G freeing the ribosome for a new round of polypeptide synthesis. How RRF interacts with EF-G and disassembles post-termination ribosomes is unknown. RRF is structurally similar to tRNA and is therefore thought to bind to the ribosomal A site and be translocated by EF-G during ribosome disassembly as a mimic of tRNA. However, EF-G variants that remain active in GTP hydrolysis but are defective in tRNA translocation fully activate RRF function in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, RRF and the GTP form of EF-G do not co-occupy the terminating ribosome in vitro; RRF is ejected by EF-G from the preformed complex. These findings suggest that RRF is not a functional mimic of tRNA and disassembles the post-termination ribosomal complex independently of the translocation activity of EF-G.     

Nonenzymic translocation and spontaneous release of noncognate peptidyl transfer ribonucleic acid from Escherichia coli ribosomes

Poly(uridylic acid)-programmed ribosomes have been used to synthesize the noncognate peptidyl-tRNA Ac-Phe-Tyr-tRNATyr and its cognate counterpart Ac(Phe)2-tRNAPhe. After synthesis, Ac(Phe)2-tRNAPhe remains, as expected, in the ribosomal acceptor (A) site, but the noncognate AcPhe-Tyr-tRNATyr does not; part of it spontaneously falls off the ribosome and the rest translocates, without elongation factor (EF) G, to the ribosomal donor site. The inhibitor of translocation viomycin prevents both the spontaneous release and the nonenzymatic translocation by confining the noncognate peptidyl-tRNA to the A site. Under these conditions, the interaction of AcPhe-Tyr-tRNATyr with the A site appears to be similar to that of Ac(Phe)2-tRNAPhe without the antibiotic, and EF-G promotes the translocation and subsequent elongation of both peptidyl-tRNAs to comparable extents. The results indicate that, without viomycin, the noncognate peptidyl-tRNA is weakly held in the ribosomal A site and support the proposal that the release of peptidyl-tRNA occurring during protein synthesis in vivo is related to a ribosomal editing mechanism which discards mistranslated nascent proteins [Menninger, J. R. (1977) Mech. Ageing Dev. 6, 131].     

New insights into the enzymatic role of EF-G in ribosome recycling

During translation, elongation factor G (EF-G) plays a catalytic role in tRNA translocation and a facilitative role in ribosome recycling. By stabilizing the rotated ribosome and interacting with ribosome recycling factor (RRF), EF-G was hypothesized to induce the domain rotations of RRF, which subsequently performs the function of splitting the major intersubunit bridges and thus separates the ribosome into subunits for recycling. Here, with systematic mutagenesis, FRET analysis and cryo-EM single particle approach, we analyzed the interplay between EF-G/RRF and post termination complex (PoTC). Our data reveal that the two conserved loops (loop I and II) at the tip region of EF-G domain IV possess distinct roles in tRNA translocation and ribosome recycling. Specifically, loop II might be directly involved in disrupting the main intersubunit bridge B2a between helix 44 (h44 from the 30S subunit) and helix 69 (H69 from the 50S subunit) in PoTC. Therefore, our data suggest a new ribosome recycling mechanism which requires an active involvement of EF-G. In addition to supporting RRF, EF-G plays an enzymatic role in destabilizing B2a via its loop II.     

Transit of tRNA through the Escherichia coli ribosome: cross-linking of the 3' end of tRNA to ribosomal proteins at the P and E sites

Photoreactive derivatives of yeast tRNA(Phe) containing 2-azidoadenosine at their 3' termini were used to trace the movement of tRNA across the 50S subunit during its transit from the P site to the E site of the 70S ribosome. When bound to the P site of poly(U)-programmed ribosomes, deacylated tRNA(Phe), Phe-tRNA(Phe) and N-acetyl-Phe-tRNA(Phe) probes labeled protein L27 and two main sites within domain V of the 23S RNA. In contrast, deacylated tRNA(Phe) bound to the E site in the presence of poly(U) labeled protein L33 and a single site within domain V of the 23S rRNA. In the absence of poly(U), the deacylated tRNA(Phe) probe also labeled protein L1. Cross-linking experiments with vacant 70S ribosomes revealed that deacylated tRNA enters the P site through the E site, progressively labeling proteins L1, L33 and, finally, L27. In the course of this process, tRNA passes through the intermediate P/E binding state. These findings suggest that the transit of tRNA from the P site to the E site involves the same interactions, but in reverse order. Moreover, our results indicate that the final release of deacylated tRNA from the ribosome is mediated by the F site, for which protein L1 serves as a marker. The results also show that the precise placement of the acceptor end of tRNA on the 50S subunit at the P and E sites is influenced in subtle ways both by the presence of aminoacyl or peptidyl moieties and, more surprisingly, by the environment of the anticodon on the 30S subunit.     

Carboxyl-terminal amino acid residues in elongation factor G essential for ribosome association and translocation.

The translocation of ribosomes on mRNA is carried out by cellular machinery that has been extremely well conserved across the entire spectrum of living species. This process requires elongation factor G (EF-G, or EF-2 in archaebacteria and eukaryotes), which is a member of the GTPase superfamily. Using genetic techniques, we have identified a series of mutated alleles of fusA (the Escherichia coli gene that encodes EF-G) that were unable to support protein synthesis in vivo. These alleles encode proteins with point mutations at codons 495 (a variant with a Q-to-P change at codon 495 [Q495P]), 502 (G502D), and 563 (G563D) and a nonsense mutation at codon 608. Biochemical analyses demonstrated that EF-G Q495P, G502D, and delta 608-703 were not disrupted in guanine nucleotide binding but were deficient in ribosome-dependent GTP hydrolysis and guanine nucleotide-dependent ribosome association. We propose that all of these mutations are present in a domain that is essential for ribosome association and that GTP hydrolysis was deficient as a secondary consequence of impaired binding to 70S ribosomes.     

Cleavage of the sarcin–ricin loop of 23S rRNA differentially affects EF-G and EF-Tu binding

Ribotoxins are potent inhibitors of protein biosynthesis and inactivate ribosomes from a variety of organisms. The ribotoxin α-sarcin cleaves the large 23S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) at the universally conserved sarcin–ricin loop (SRL) leading to complete inactivation of the ribosome and cellular death. The SRL interacts with translation factors that hydrolyze GTP, and it is important for their binding to the ribosome, but its precise role is not yet understood. We studied the effect of α-sarcin on defined steps of translation by the bacterial ribosome. α-Sarcin-treated ribosomes showed no defects in mRNA and tRNA binding, peptide-bond formation and sparsomycin-dependent translocation. Cleavage of SRL slightly affected binding of elongation factor Tu ternary complex (EF-Tu•GTP•tRNA) to the ribosome. In contrast, the activity of elongation factor G (EF-G) was strongly impaired in α-sarcin-treated ribosomes. Importantly, cleavage of SRL inhibited EF-G binding, and consequently GTP hydrolysis and mRNA–tRNA translocation. These results suggest that the SRL is more critical in EF-G than ternary complex binding to the ribosome implicating different requirements in this region of the ribosome during protein elongation.     

Domain III of elongation factor G from Thermus thermophilus is essential for induction of GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome

Two elongation factors (EF) EF-Tu and EF-G participate in the elongation phase during protein biosynthesis on the ribosome. Their functional cycles depend on GTP binding and its hydrolysis. The EF-Tu complexed with GTP and aminoacyl-tRNA delivers tRNA to the ribosome, whereas EF-G stimulates translocation, a process in which tRNA and mRNA movements occur in the ribosome. In the present paper we report that: (a) intrinsic GTPase activity of EF-G is influenced by excision of its domain III; (b) the EF-G lacking domain III has a 10(3)-fold decreased GTPase activity on the ribosome, whereas its affinity for GTP is slightly decreased; and (c) the truncated EF-G does not stimulate translocation despite the physical presence of domain IV, which is also very important for translocation. By contrast, the interactions of the truncated factor with GDP and fusidic acid-dependent binding of EF-G.GDP complex to the ribosome are not influenced. These findings indicate an essential contribution of domain III to activation of GTP hydrolysis. These results also suggest conformational changes of the EF-G molecule in the course of its interaction with the ribosome that might be induced by GTP binding and hydrolysis.     

Isolation and characterization of an inhibitor of ribosome-dependent GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor G

Two inhibitors of ribosome-dependent GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor (EF)G were found in the ribosome wash of Escherichia coli strain B. One of these inhibitors was purified to homogeneity and characterized. The isolated inhibitor was found to consist of two polypeptide subunits with apparent molecular masses of 23 kDa and 10 kDa. Inhibition of EF-G GTPase could not be overcome by increasing amounts of the elongation factor or high concentrations of GTP, but was reversed by large amounts of ribosomes. The effect of the inhibitor was reduced by increasing concentrations of either 30S or 50S ribosomal subunits. EF-G-dependent GTPase of 50S ribosomal subunits was not affected by the inhibitor. These findings clearly show that the inhibitor interferes with the modulation of EF-G GTPase activity by the interactions between 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits. Under conditions, where 30S CsCl core particles are able to associate with 50S subunits and to stimulate EF-G GTPase, the effect of the inhibitor was considerably reduced when intact 30S ribosomal subunits were substituted by 30S CsCl core particles. This finding indicates that 30S CsCl split proteins are important for the action of the inhibitor and that the inhibitor does not affect the EF-G GTPase merely by interfering with the association of ribosomal subunits. Furthermore, poly(U)-dependent poly(phenylalanine) synthesis was considerably less sensitive to the inhibitor than EF-G GTPase. When ribosomes were preincubated with poly(U) and Phe-tRNA(Phe), poly(phenylalanine) synthesis was considerably less affected by the inhibitor, whereas EF-G GTPase was still sensitive.