Fingertip replantation using the subdermal pocket procedure

Restoration of finger length and function are the goals of replantation after fingertip amputation. Methods include microsurgical replantation and nonmicrosurgical replantation, such as composite graft techniques. To increase the survival rates for composite grafts, the subcutaneous pocket procedure has been used as a salvage procedure. The subdermal pocket procedure, which is a modification of the subcutaneous pocket procedure, was used for replantation of 17 fingertips in 16 consecutive patients. Eight fingertips experienced guillotine injuries and the other nine fingertips experienced crush injuries. Revascularization of one digital artery without available venous outflow was performed for six fingers, and composite graft techniques were used for the other 11 fingers. The success rate was 16 of 17 cases. The difference in success rates for guillotine versus crush injuries was statistically significant. Comparison of patients with arterial anastomoses and patients without arterial anastomoses also indicated a statistically significant difference. Thirteen fingertips survived completely. One finger, demonstrating complete loss and early termination of the pocketing procedure, was amputated on the eighth postoperative day. Two fingers were partially lost because of severe crushing injuries. One finger demonstrated partial loss of more than one quarter of the fingertip, which required secondary revision, because the patient was a heavy smoker. The pocketing period was 8 +/- 1 days (mean +/- SD, n = 6) for the fingers revascularized with one digital arterial anastomosis and 13.3 +/- 1.9 days (n = 10) for the fingers successfully replanted with composite graft techniques. The mean active range of motion of the interphalangeal joint of the three thumbs was 65 +/- 5 degrees, and that of the distal interphalangeal joint of the other 11 fingers was 51 +/- 11 degrees. The static two-point discrimination result was 6.4 +/- 1.0 mm (n = 14) after an average of 11 +/- 5 months of follow-up monitoring. Compared with other methods, the subdermal pocket procedure has the advantages of exact subdermal/subdermal contact, a shorter pocketing period, and more feasible observation. The method can offer an alternative salvage procedure for fingertip amputations with no suitable vessels available for microsurgical replantation.     

Upper extremity microsurgery

Learning objectives: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the indications for free flap coverage of the upper extremity. 2. Know the advantages and disadvantages of the flaps discussed. 3. Have a basic understanding of the anatomy of the flaps discussed. 4. Have a variety of options for free tissue transfer.The application of microsurgical tissue transfer to reconstruction of the upper extremity allows repair of significant bone and soft-tissue defects. Through the years the approach has changed from one of simply getting the wound covered to primary reconstruction to preserve or regain function. A wide variety of free flaps offers the potential to reconstruct nearly any defect of the arm and hand. Vascularized bone transfer can be utilized to repair large bony defects, while innervated free muscle transfer can replace missing muscle function. The total array of flaps and their indications is beyond the scope of a single discussion, but this article focuses on a few flaps that have found application for coverage and functional restoration in the hand and upper extremity.     

Microsurgical replantation of the amputated nose

A case of successful replantation of the nose is presented. Two arteries and one vein were anastomosed, providing a stable framework for direct revascularization of the amputated nasal segment. This resulted in complete survival of the nose, with an excellent aesthetic result. However, despite successful microsurgical arterial and venous repair, significant postoperative blood loss still occurred as a result of anticoagulation. In cases of the amputation of specialized structures, the improved functional and cosmetic result obtained with replantation must be weighed against the risk of blood-borne disease transmission when postoperative transfusion is required. Recognizing the potential need for postoperative transfusion in these cases is important in allowing the surgeon to exercise appropriate judgment in deciding whether replantation should be performed.     

Soft-tissue injuries of the fingertip: methods of evaluation and treatment. An algorithmic approach

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the anatomy of the fingertip. 2. Describe the methods of evaluating fingertip injuries. 3. Discuss reconstructive options for various tip injuries. SUMMARY: The fingertip is the most commonly injured part of the hand, and therefore fingertip injuries are among the most frequent injuries that plastic surgeons are asked to treat. Although microsurgical techniques have enabled replantation of even very distal tip amputations, it is relatively uncommon that a distal tip injury will be appropriate for replantation. In the event that replantation is not pursued, options for distal tip soft-tissue reconstruction must be considered. This review presents a straightforward method for evaluating fingertip injuries and provides an algorithm for fingertip reconstruction.     

Microvascular surgery in young children.

We present a series of 8 children, all less than 6 years of age, which demonstrates the feasibility of primary microvascular replantation or reconstruction of amputated or devascularized parts in children. The function and the appearance obtained were excellent, and the potential for growth was maintained. Fortunately, the vessels were larger in these young children than one would expect. It is apparent that in a healthy, stable child, the careful application of microsurgical principles is an excellent method for salvaging devascularized or amputated parts that are vital for function or appearance.     

Saving Amputated Digits: Current Status of Replantation of Fingers and Hands

Since the advent of microsurgery in the 1960''s it has become possible to sucessfully repair vessels as small as 0.5 mm in diameter, which makes the replantation of totally severed digits possible. Some centers have reported 50 to 60 percent survival of completely severed digits and up to 100 percent survival of amputated hands and of partially amputed but otherwise non-viable digits that were reattached. In view of this success, severed members should be considered as potentially replantable.The recommended indications for replantation are: (1) multiple digital amputations at or proximal to the proximal interphalangeal joint; (2) amputation of the thumb; (3) amputation of the wrist or hand; (4) partially attached digits that are non-viable without reattachment.The surviving replanted digits give functional improvement to the hand and prove cosmetically acceptable.     

Nonmicrosurgical use of the radial forearm flap for penile reconstruction

Although the era of microsurgical techniques has greatly expanded the number of possible solutions for penile reconstruction, additional options are still needed for some unusual situations when microsurgery is not available or not desired. This article describes the first nonmicrosurgical use of the radial forearm flap for penile reconstruction. With this technique, an osteocutaneous radial forearm flap 15 x 20 cm in size is elevated as a reverse-flow island flap and used to create a neopenis in the classic "tube within a tube" fashion. The neopenis is then transferred to the recipient site as a distant flap, without dividing its vascular connection with the forearm. Once a complete healing is ensured after the following 2 to 3 weeks, the pedicle is cut and the penile reconstruction is completed. Since 1995, this technique was used for total penile reconstruction in four patients: two with congenital penile agenesis, one with penile amputation as a result of a high-voltage electrical injury, and one with total loss of the external genitalia as a result of a shotgun injury. The patients have been followed up for 1 to 4 years. Good results were achieved in all patients. In conclusion, non-microsurgical use of the radial forearm flap seems to be a useful alternative to create an innervated functionally and aesthetically acceptable neopenis when microsurgery is not available or not desired. Although it is a multistage procedure, it is easy to perform. Moreover, this technique provides all well-known advantages of the radial forearm flap in penile reconstruction but does not require the sophisticated equipment and expertise of microsurgery. This is a great advantage that enables surgeons without microsurgical skill to use the radial forearm flap for phallic reconstruction. The author believes that the described technique will be extremely useful in developing countries that have limited resources and where microsurgery is difficult to obtain.     

Replantation of fingertip amputation by using the pocket principle in adults

There are several treatment modalities for zone 1 or zone 2 fingertip amputations that cannot be replanted by using microsurgical techniques, such as delayed secondary healing, stump revision, skin graft, local flaps, distant flaps, and composite graft. Among these, composite graft of the amputated digit tip is the only possible means of achieving a full-length digit with a normal nail complex. The pocket principle can provide an extra blood supply for survival of the composite graft of the amputated finger by enlarging the area of vascular contact. The surgery was performed in two stages. The amputated digit was debrided, deepithelialized, and reattached to the proximal stump. The reattached finger was inserted into the abdominal pocket. About 3 weeks later, the finger was removed from the pocket and covered with a skin graft. We have consecutively replanted 29 fingers in 25 adult patients with fingertip amputations by using the pocket principle. All were complete amputations with crushing or avulsion injuries. Average age was 33.64 years, and men were predominant. The right hand, the dominant one, was more frequently injured, with the middle finger being the most commonly injured. Of the 29 fingers, 16 (55.2 percent) survived completely and 10 (34.5 percent) had partial necrosis less than one-quarter of the length of the amputated part. The results of the above 26 fingers were satisfactory from both functional and cosmetic aspects. Twenty of the 29 fingers, which had been followed up for more than 6 months (an average of 16 months), were included in a sensory evaluation. Fifteen of these 20 fingers (75 percent) were classified as "good" (static two-point discrimination of less than 8 mm and normal use). From the overall results and our experience, we suggest that the pocket principle is a safe and valuable method in replantation of zone 1 or zone 2 fingertip amputation, an alternative to microvascular replantation, even in adults.     

Thumb replantation after cardiac transplantation

Generally, severe medical illnesses, including chronic immunosuppression and heavy steroid use, have been deemed relative contraindications for replantation surgery. We report the successful replantation of an amputated thumb in a patient who had previously undergone heart transplantation and was on therapeutic immunosuppression. Despite extensive soft-tissue damage and joint involvement, thumb function and sensibility returned to acceptable levels. This case demonstrates that digital bony union, tendon repair healing, and nerve regeneration are not significantly altered by the standard immunosuppressive regimen following major organ transplant. The implications raised by this case for possible transplantation of allograft digits or limbs are discussed in detail.     

Technical variations of the bipedicled TRAM flap in unilateral breast reconstruction: effects of conventional versus microsurgical techniques of pedicle transfer on complications rates

In cases of unilateral breast reconstruction with a transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap, poorly perfused tissue, which is normally excised to avoid subsequent fat necrosis, must sometimes be used to achieve adequate breast size and projection. In such cases, incorporation of a second vascular pedicle into the flap design improves perfusion. The authors retrospectively examined their experience with bipedicled TRAM flap-based unilateral breast reconstruction to determine whether the use of microsurgical rather than conventional (nonmicrosurgical) techniques for flap transfer resulted in lower incidences of flap-site fat necrosis and donor-site hernia/bulge. The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with a bipedicled TRAM or deep inferior epigastric perforator flap between January of 1991 and March of 2001. Group 1 consisted of patients who had undergone flap transfer using a conventional technique for both pedicles; group 2, patients who had flap transfer using a conventional technique for one pedicle and a microsurgical technique for the other; and group 3, patients who had flap transfer using a microsurgical technique for both pedicles. Of the 863 patients identified, 72 (8.3 percent) had undergone reconstruction using a bipedicled flap. There were 43 patients in group 1, 24 patients in group 2, and five patients in group 3. Only one case of total flap loss had occurred (group 1). Partial flap loss occurred in two patients in group 1 (5 percent) and three patients in group 2 (13 percent). Fat necrosis occurred more frequently in groups 1 (23 percent) and 2 (29 percent) than in group 3 (0 percent) (p = 0.5, Fisher's exact test). Similarly, bulge or hernia was more common in groups 1 (12 percent) and 2 (4 percent) than in group 3 (0 percent) (p = 0.6, Fisher's exact test). In this study, patients who received a bipedicled TRAM flap using microsurgical techniques alone (group 3) appeared to have better flap perfusion and less frequent hernia/bulge than did patients who underwent flap transfer using conventional (group 1) or combined techniques (group 2). However, these differences were not statistically significant, and this trend must be verified in a larger study.     

Transplantation of an osteoarthrotendinous allograft with autogenous soft-tissue coverage for thumb reconstruction

A fresh-frozen thumb osteoarthrotendinous allograft and autogenous coverage were used to reconstruct a thumb. Immunosuppressants were not used. The components of the composite allograft are present and functioning 1 year post-operatively. Host cells have replaced and are replacing bone and tendinous structures. The "survival" of this osteoarthrotendinous allograft may have important implications in the treatment of patients with previous digital amputations, congenital absence of digits, and amputated digits that have failed replantation or are not replantable because of severely damaged vessels.     

Successful replantation of an amputated nasal tip by microvascular anastomosis

Successful microsurgical replantation of a completely avulsed nasal tip is presented. The result is excellent. The technical challenge involved no sizable veins for drainage. This problem was solved by an artery-to-vein shunting. For facial avulsions, there is nothing superior to the original tissue, and replantation should always be attempted first.     

Microsurgical tissue transplantation or replantation in patients with psychoneurological impairment

Sometimes patients with a psychoneurological impairment present with a traumatic injury that requires either microsurgical replantation or free-tissue transfer. We reviewed 38 patients undergoing 40 microvascular operations; the patients included 26 patients with psychological impairment (group 1), 3 with mental disability (group 2), and 9 with an acquired head injury and consciousness disturbance (Glasgow Coma Scale score < or =14) (group 3). Patients with a psychological impairment, especially those with a self-inflicted injury, are often uncooperative and do not recognize the necessity of restorative procedures. A multidisciplinary approach by the trauma surgeon, plastic surgeon, psychiatrist, and neurosurgeon, with coordinated assistance from the physician, nurse, therapist, and family, is required for treatment. In our study the success rate of replantation was 77.8 percent (14 of 18); for free tissue transfer the success rate was 95.5 percent (21 of 22). The overall success rate of microsurgical procedures (87.5 percent, 35 of 40) was similar to that in the population at large. Patients with psychological impairment tend to be lost during follow-up; therefore, their functional results may be poorer than expected. Nonetheless, patients with psychological impairment should not be deprived of the benefits of restorative surgery.     

Crossover replantation and fillet flap coverage of the stump after ectopic implantation: a case of bilateral leg amputation

A successful case of crossover replantation of the left foot to the stump of the right leg and temporary ectopic implantation of the right amputated foot on the forearm is described. The ectopically implanted right foot was used as a free fillet flap for the late reconstruction of the left leg stump. At the latest follow-up examination, 18 months after the accident, the patient was able to walk independently with a prosthesis on the stump of the left leg. Both the cross-replanted foot and the free filleted foot flap, used for the reconstruction of the left leg stump, have maintained adequate protective sensation. The importance of utilization of amputated parts for functional reconstruction is stressed. Crossover replantations and ectopic implantations should be considered in bilateral amputations for the salvage of at least one extremity.     

A new strategy of fingertip reattachment: sequential use of microsurgical technique and pocketing of composite graft

Many methods have been used to reattach amputated fingertips. Of these methods, microsurgery has been accepted as the procedure of choice because the defining characteristic of a microsurgically replanted finger is that its surival in the recipient bed is predicated on functioning intravascular circulation. Although considerable progress has been made in the techniques for microvascular replantation of amputated fingers, the replantation of an amputated fingertip is difficult because digital arteries branch into small arteries. This is in addition to digital veins that run from both sides of the nail bed to the median dorsal sides, which are difficult to separate from the immobile soft tissue. Furthermore, even with the most technically skilled microsurgeon, replantation failure often occurs, especially in severe injury cases. Therefore, the technique is not the only protection against failure, and a new strategy of fingertip reattachment is needed. From March of 1997 to December of 1999, 12 fingers of 11 patients with zone 1 or zone 2 fingertip amputations that were reattached microsurgically but were compromised were deepithelialized, reattached, and then inserted into the abdominal pocket. All had been complete amputations with crushing injuries. Approximately 3 weeks later, the fingers were depocketed and covered with a skin graft. Of the 12 fingers, 7 survived completely and 3 had partial necrosis on less than one-third the volume of the amputated part. The complete survival rate was approximately 58 percent. The results of the above 10 fingers were satisfactory from both functional and cosmetic aspects. The authors believe that this high success rate was achieved because the deepithelialized finger pulp was placed in direct contact with the deep abdominal fascia, which was equipped with plentiful vascularity, not subcutaneous fat. In addition, the pocketing was performed promptly before necrosis of the compromised fingertip occurred. From the results of this study, it is clear that this new method is useful and can raise the survival rate of an amputated fingertip.     

Microsurgical hypospadias repair

Successful primary hypospadias repair depends on careful execution of surgical principles, particularly during the urethroplasty portion of the procedure. These principles include careful tissue handling, development of well-vascularized flaps, and avoidance of placing sutures in the uroepithelial surface. Despite meticulous repair, the complication rate requiring secondary surgery is 15 to 30 percent. For the past year, the authors have utilized an operating room microscope, microsurgical instruments, a specially designed microsuture, and a Biooclusive dressing to decrease the postoperative morbidity and subsequent complications requiring secondary surgery (6.5 percent). A comparison of 50 hypospadias patients on whom no microsurgical repair had been used was made with 62 patients on whom microsurgical techniques were employed. The nonmicrosurgical group had 17 complications, 12 of which required reoperation (24 percent). The microsurgical group had 8 complications, 4 of which required reoperation (6.5 percent).     

Pollicization

Congenital absence or traumatic amputation of the thumb is a major disability profoundly disturbing the function of the hand, as the thumb represents an estimated 50% of total hand function. The methods for thumb reconstruction utilizing the index finger were developed some twenty years ago, and progress has been made in the last several years with emphasis on intrinsic muscle reconstruction as emphasized by Buck-Gramcko. The method, technique and anatomy of index pollicization is discussed, and representative cases presented for congenital absence of the thumb and for traumatic amputation of the thumb.     

Significance of venous anastomosis in fingertip replantation

Adequate venous outflow is the most important factor for successful fingertip replantation. The authors have attempted venous anastomosis in all cases of fingertip replantation to overcome postoperative congestion. In this article, the significance of venous repair for fingertip replantation is described from the authors' results of 64 complete fingertip amputations in 55 consecutive patients, which were replanted from January of 1996 to June of 2001. The overall survival rate was 86 percent. Of the 44 replantations in zone I, 37 survived, and the success rate was 84 percent. Of the 20 replantations in zone II, 18 survived, and the success rate was 90 percent. Venous anastomosis was attempted in all cases, but it was possible in 39 zone I and in all zone II replantations. For arterial repair, vein grafts were necessary in 17 of the 44 zone I and in one of the 20 zone II replantations; for venous repair, they were necessary in six zone I replantations and one zone II replantation. Postoperative vascular complications occurred in 15 replantations. There were five cases of arterial thrombosis and 10 cases of venous congestion. Venous congestion occurred in nine zone I and one zone II replantations. In five of these 10 replantations, venous anastomosis was not possible. In another five replantations, venous outflow was established at the time of surgery, but occlusion occurred subsequently. Except for the five failures resulting from arterial thrombosis, successful venous repair was possible in 49 of 59 replantations (83 percent). Despite the demand for skillful microsurgical technique and longer operation time, the authors' results using venous anastomosis in successful fingertip replantations are encouraging. By performing venous anastomosis, external bleeding can be avoided and a higher survival rate can be achieved. Venous anastomosis for fingertip replantation is a reliable and worthwhile procedure.     

Immediate toe-to-hand transfer in acute hand injuries: overall results, compared with results for elective cases

In the past 5 years, 25 mutilated digits were reconstructed with immediate toe-to-hand transfers after acute hand injuries, for 21 patients. The overall results of the immediate toe-to-hand transfers were evaluated and compared with the results of 65 elective procedures performed during the same period by the same surgeon. There were 15 cases of great toe-to-hand transfer for thumb reconstruction, two cases of second toe transfer for index finger reconstruction, and four cases of simultaneous two-toe transfer for reconstruction of multiple-digit amputations. Two cases (two of 25 cases, 8 percent) were successfully salvaged with emergency reexploration. The incidences of emergency reexploration and postoperative infection were not significantly different from those for elective toe-to-hand transfer cases. The duration of industrial insurance coverage was much shorter than for elective cases, averaging 225 days (p < 0.001). Approximately 44 percent of the patients maintained their original jobs after immediate toe-to-hand transfer. The subjective satisfaction self-assessment scores of aesthetic appearance and function for the newly reconstructed thumb averaged 80 and 88 (of a total score of 100), respectively. Although satisfaction was lower than for elective reconstruction (p < 0.001), it was higher than for reconstruction of other digits. The donor-site appearance after great toe harvesting was mostly unsatisfactory. Immediate toe-to-hand transfer provides many advantages over the elective procedure in acute hand injuries, including single-stage reconstruction, shortened convalescence, early return to work, and socioeconomic efficiency. Because there were no significant differences in the success rates, frequencies of complications, or ultimate functional results, immediate toe-to-hand transfer is a safe and reliable procedure that is indicated for specific cases of acute digital amputation.     

Breast reduction

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the preoperative considerations that must be weighed to appropriately assess operative risk of breast reduction. 2. Have a full understanding of the basic techniques that are available to treat the patient with macromastia. 3. Identify which patients are best suited to a particular technique. 4. Identify common complications associated with breast reduction and understand how to treat them. SUMMARY: Breast reduction remains a basic plastic surgery procedure designed to alleviate upper torso complaints resulting from macromastia. Historically, the inverted-T inferior pedicle procedure was the dominant technique for the treatment of macromastia for 40 years. The past two decades have seen a reexamination of breast reduction technique in an attempt to improve on the results and minimize complications. As a result, a new genre of procedures based on different pedicles and short-scar skin management techniques has been introduced. With these new procedures, the plastic surgeon now has a variety of different techniques that can be offered for reducing the hypertrophic breast. Strategically applying the concepts inherent in these procedures to the correct patient can provide outstanding results with few complications. In this article, the concepts and results of these various procedures are discussed to give the reader a basic understanding of the options available for breast reduction.