Thoracodorsal vessels as recipient vessels for the free TRAM flap in delayed breast reconstruction.

The internal mammary vessels have been recommended as the first choice recipient vessels for delayed breast reconstruction with the free TRAM flap. This approach has avoided surgery in the previously operated axilla, has required a shorter pedicle length, and has allowed for more medial placement of the TRAM tissue. Frequency of nonusable axillary vessels has been reported at 11 percent, with a 6 percent incidence of flap loss in the delayed reconstructive setting. We reviewed our experience with the thoracodorsal vessels as recipient vessels in delayed free TRAM breast reconstruction to assess more accurately the adequacy of these potential recipient vessels. All patients undergoing delayed TRAM reconstruction were reviewed. Forty-seven of 300 consecutive TRAM procedures were for planned delayed free reconstruction. In seven of the patients (15 percent), the thoracodorsal vessels were found to be inadequate for free reconstruction. A supercharged pedicled TRAM was used for reconstruction in each of these seven patients. Average operating room time was 7 hours. Mean follow-up time was 38 months. Nineteen percent of all patients developed at least one complication. Twelve percent of free TRAM patients developed a complication, whereas 57 percent of supercharged patients developed a postoperative complication. The difference in complication rates was statistically significant. The thoracodorsal vessels have provided an adequate recipient vessel in 85 percent of delayed free TRAM reconstructions, comparable to previous reports. Pedicling and supercharging the flap, in those situations in which the thoracodorsal vessels were inadequate, were associated with an increased incidence of postoperative complications. This suggests that in the delayed reconstructive setting, higher-risk patients benefit from free reconstruction over supercharged reconstructions. A second recipient vessel should be used when the thoracodorsal vessels are inadequate for planned free TRAM reconstruction. In these circumstances, we would recommend the use of the internal mammary vessels followed by the thoracoacromial vessels as reliable alternative recipient sites for delayed free TRAM reconstruction.     

Choice of recipient vessels in delayed TRAM flap breast reconstruction after radiotherapy

This study compared the use of the internal mammary and thoracodorsal recipient vessels in a uniform group of patients who underwent delayed TRAM flap reconstruction after radiotherapy, focusing on usability rates and outcomes. The authors identified 123 delayed TRAM flap patients who had undergone postmastectomy radiotherapy from a prospective database (1990 to 2001). Recipient vessel unusability rates were calculated on the basis of reports of inspection of a vessel, either by direct intraoperative dissection or by findings from color Doppler examination (internal mammary vessels only). Charts were reviewed for outcomes including flap loss, vascular complications, fat necrosis, and lymphedema; t-test and chi-square analyses were performed to compare outcomes and unusability rates, and multiple regression analysis was performed to determine factors influencing outcome. Of the 123 planned free TRAM flaps, 106 were completed as free flaps and 17 were performed as pedicled flaps because of unusable recipient vessels. Of the free flaps, 45 were anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels, 55 to the thoracodorsal vessels, and six to other vessels. The internal mammary and thoracodorsal groups did not differ significantly in body mass index, abdominal scars, smoking history, time delay between irradiation and TRAM flap reconstruction, or flap ischemia time. Radiation doses to the axilla (thoracodorsal), internal mammary chain, and supraclavicular fossa were similar between the groups. The internal mammary vessels were rejected in 11 (20 percent) of 56 cases, and the thoracodorsal vessels were rejected in 19 (26 percent) of 74 cases (p = 0.42). In cases with unusable internal mammary vessels, 46 percent (n = 5) had inadequate veins, 27 percent (n = 3) had inadequate arteries, and in 27 percent (n = 3) both vessels were inadequate. In the 19 cases with unusable thoracodorsal vessels, 84 percent (n = 16) were excessively scarred, 11 percent (n = 2) had inadequate vessels, and 5 percent (n = 1) were absent. Outcomes were similar regardless of recipient vessels used (internal mammary versus thoracodorsal): total flap loss, 0 percent versus 4 percent (p = 0.20); vascular complications, 6.7 percent versus 11 percent (p = 0.46); arm lymphedema, 4.4 percent versus 9 percent (p = 0.37); partial flap loss, 9 percent versus 6 percent (p = 0.54); and fat necrosis, 18 percent versus 15 percent (p = 0.69). Multivariate analysis revealed a trend for higher complication rates in smokers and with the use of the thoracodorsal vessels as the recipients. Overall, no discernible unusability or outcome differences were detected between the internal mammary and thoracodorsal groups.     

Immediate free TRAM reconstruction in lumpectomy and radiation failure patients

Local recurrence after lumpectomy and radiation therapy indicates failed breast conservation surgery. These patients often proceed to mastectomy and are candidates for autogenous breast reconstruction. Free transverse rectus abdominus muscle (TRAM) reconstruction in these patients is complicated by repeated axillary dissection and the use of irradiated tissue. Complication rates for pedicled TRAMs have been reported at 33 percent when used in irradiated tissue beds. We report our results using the free TRAM for breast reconstruction after lumpectomy and radiation failure. All patients within this study developed a local recurrence after lumpectomy and radiation therapy. All patients had undergone axillary dissection for staging at the time of their lumpectomy. Patient records were reviewed for patient age, total radiation dose, associated risk factors for TRAM failure, operative time, donor vessels used for anastomosis, status of the native thoracodorsal vessels at the time of surgery, and postoperative complications. Over a 7-year period, 16 TRAM patients had undergone previous breast conservation surgery. Of these 16 patients, 14 underwent reconstruction with a planned free TRAM after simple mastectomy. Average operating room time was 7 hours. There were no partial or total flap losses. Complications were seen in 14 percent of the overall group. Overall, we found that the free TRAM provided an excellent aesthetic result with a lower complication rate than previously reported for pedicled TRAM flaps in irradiated beds. The thoracodorsal vessels provided an adequate donor vessel in 93 percent of the cases. The free TRAM provides a superior alternative in immediate reconstruction in patients who have failed breast conservative surgery.     

Perforator flap breast reconstruction using internal mammary perforator branches as a recipient site: an anatomical and clinical analysis

A variety of useful recipient sites exist for breast reconstruction with free flaps, and correct selection remains a significant decision for the surgeon. Among the main pedicles, the disadvantages of the internal mammary vessels are the necessity of costal cartilage resection and the impairment of future cardiac bypass. This study was designed to reduce morbidity and to seek alternative recipient vessels. In the anatomical part of the study, 32 parasternal regions from 16 fresh cadavers were used. The locations and components of internal mammary perforator branches were measured and a histomorphometric analysis was performed. In the clinical part of the study, 36 patients underwent 38 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap and two superior gluteal artery perforator flap breast reconstructions (31 immediate and four bilateral). The recipient vessels were evaluated. In the anatomical study, there were 22 perforating vessels, with 14 (63.6 percent) on the second intercostal space and 11 (50 percent) with one artery and vein. The average (+/-SD) internal and external perforator artery diameters were 598.48 +/- 176.68 microm and 848.97 +/- 276.68 microm, respectively. In the clinical study, 13 successful anastomoses (32.5 percent) were performed at the internal mammary perforator branches (second and third intercostal spaces) with 12 DIEP flaps and one superior gluteal artery perforator flap (all performed as immediate reconstructions). One case of intraoperative vein thrombosis and one case of pedicle avulsion during flap molding were observed. The anatomic and clinical studies demonstrated that the internal mammary perforator branch as a recipient site is a further refinement to free flap breast reconstruction. However, it is neither a reproducible technique nor potentially applicable in all patients. Preoperative planning between the general surgeon and the plastic surgeon is crucial to preserve the main perforator branches during mastectomy. The procedure was not demonstrable in late reconstructions. The main advantages of internal mammary perforator branches used as recipient sites are sparing of the internal mammary vessels for a possible future cardiac surgery, prevention of thoracic deformities, and reduction of the operative time by limited dissection. Despite this, limited surgical exposure, caliber incompatibility, and technical difficulties have to be considered as the main restrictions.     

Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps

Breast reconstruction using the lower abdominal free superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap has the potential to virtually eliminate abdominal donor-site morbidity because the rectus abdominis fascia and muscle are not incised or excised. However, despite its advantages, the free SIEA flap for breast reconstruction is rarely used. A prospective study was conducted of the reliability and outcomes of the use of SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction compared with transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Breast reconstruction with an SIEA flap was attempted in 47 consecutive free autologous tissue breast reconstructions between August of 2001 and November of 2002. The average patient age was 49 years, and the average body mass index was 27 kg/m. The SIEA flap was used in 14 (30 percent) of these breast reconstructions in 12 patients. An SIEA flap was not used in the remaining 33 cases because the SIEA was absent or was deemed too small. The mean superficial inferior epigastric vessel pedicle length was approximately 7 cm. The internal mammary vessels were used as recipients in all SIEA flap cases so that the flap could be positioned sufficiently medially on the chest wall. The average hospital stay was significantly shorter for patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with SIEA flaps than it was for those who underwent reconstruction with TRAM or DIEP flaps. Of the 47 free flaps, one SIEA flap was lost because of arterial thrombosis. Medium-size and large breasts were reconstructed with hemi-lower abdominal SIEA flaps, with aesthetic results similar to those obtained with TRAM and DIEP flaps. The free SIEA flap is an attractive option for autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Harvest of this flap does not injure the anterior rectus fascia or underlying rectus abdominis muscle. This can potentially eliminate abdominal donor-site complications such as bulge and hernia formation, and decrease weakness, discomfort, and hospital stay compared with TRAM and DIEP flaps. The disadvantages of an SIEA flap are a smaller pedicle diameter and shorter pedicle length than TRAM and DIEP flaps and the absence or inadequacy of an arterial pedicle in most patients. Nevertheless, in selected patients, the SIEA flap offers advantages over the TRAM and DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.     

Outcome comparison between free and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient.

Obesity can be a contraindication for TRAM flap breast reconstruction. This study reviewed the authors' experience with free TRAM and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient to examine the complication rates associated with each reconstructive method and to determine whether TRAM flap reconstruction can safely be used in these high-risk patients. The records of 221 consecutive TRAM flap reconstructions were reviewed. Preoperative risk factors for morbidity were noted, as well as the incidence of TRAM flap success, operative time, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Patients were categorized as obese if their body mass index was greater than 25.8 kg/m2. Data were tabulated using contingency tables and analyzed using chi-squared statistics. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for flap complications.Of the 221 patients studied, 114 patients were found to be obese (body mass index >25.8 kg/m2). Of these 114 patients, 78 were reconstructed with free TRAM flaps and 36 were reconstructed with pedicled flaps. In these obese patients, the average body mass index was 32 kg/m2 in the free TRAM and 30 kg/m2 in the pedicled TRAM flap reconstructions. There were no significant differences between groups with regard to age or preoperative risk factors. Length of hospital stay and operative time did not differ significantly between the two reconstructive methods. The average duration of follow-up was 24 months in both groups. Complications occurred in 26 percent of free TRAM flap reconstructions and 33 percent of pedicled reconstructions. There was no significant difference between reconstructive methods with regard to overall complication rates. Increasing body mass index was found to have a significant effect on free TRAM flap complications (p = 0.008) but not on pedicled TRAM flap complications. There were no partial or total flap losses in obese free TRAM flap patients; however, there was one case of total flap loss and four cases of partial flap loss in the obese pedicled TRAM flap group. The incidence of flap loss was significantly higher when pedicled TRAM flaps were used for reconstruction in obese patients (p = 0.04). Obese patients who underwent reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flaps were more likely to experience a complication if they also smoked (p = 0.001).There was no significant difference in operating time or length of stay when pedicled and free TRAM flap reconstructions in obese patients were compared. There were more cases of flap necrosis in the pedicled TRAM flap group. Free TRAM flaps may provide some benefit in reducing partial flap loss in obese patients, but overall complication rates were not significantly different between reconstructive methods. Of 114 patients, there was only one case of total reconstructive failure. From these findings, it seems that the free or pedicled TRAM flap can be used successfully for breast reconstruction in the majority of patients with obesity. Surgeons should use the technique with which they are most familiar to obtain consistent results.     

Alternative venous outflow vessels in microvascular breast reconstruction

The lack of adequate recipient vessels often complicates microvascular breast reconstruction in patients who have previously undergone mastectomy and irradiation. In addition, significant size mismatch, particularly in the outflow veins, is an important contributor to vessel thrombosis and flap failure. The purpose of this study was to review the authors' experience with alternative venous outflow vessels for microvascular breast reconstruction. In a retrospective analysis of 1278 microvascular breast reconstructions performed over a 10-year period, the authors identified all patients in whom the external jugular or cephalic veins were used as the outflow vessels. Patient demographics, flap choice, the reasons for the use of alternative venous drainage vessels, and the incidence of microsurgical complications were analyzed. The external jugular was used in 23 flaps performed in procedures with 22 patients. The superior gluteal and transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps were used in the majority of the cases in which the external jugular vein was used (72 percent gluteal, 20 percent TRAM flap). The need for alternative venous outflow vessels was usually due to a significant vessel size mismatch between the superior gluteal and internal mammary veins (74 percent). For three of the external jugular vein flaps (13 percent), the vein was used for salvage after the primary draining vein thrombosed, and two of three flaps in these cases were eventually salvaged. In three patients, the external jugular vein thrombosed, resulting in two flap losses, while the third was salvaged using the cephalic vein. A total of two flaps were lost in the external jugular vein group. The cephalic vein was used in 11 flaps (TRAM, 64.3 percent; superior gluteal, 35.7 percent) performed in 11 patients. In five patients (54.5 percent), the cephalic vein was used to salvage a flap after the primary draining vein thrombosed; the procedure was successful in four cases. In three patients, the cephalic vein thrombosed, resulting in two flap losses. One patient suffered a thrombosis after the cephalic vein was used to salvage a flap in which the external jugular vein was initially used, leading to flap loss, while a second patient experienced cephalic vein thrombosis on postoperative day 7 while carrying a heavy package. There was only one minor complication attributable to the harvest of the external jugular or cephalic vein (small neck hematoma that was aspirated), and the resultant scars were excellent. The external jugular and cephalic veins are important ancillary veins available for microvascular breast reconstruction. The dissection of these vessels is straightforward, and their use is well tolerated and highly successful.     

Optimizing autologous breast reconstruction in thin patients

Breast reconstruction with a transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap plus an implant has been proposed as an option for women with a thin body habitus who do not have sufficient abdominal tissue to permit reconstruction with a TRAM flap alone. The standard autologous tissue reconstructive procedure in these women is a combined latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and breast implant. We reviewed our experience performing TRAM flap/implant and latissimus dorsi flap/implant breast reconstruction to compare complication rates and aesthetic outcomes between these two types of reconstruction. Between 1992 and 1999, 88 breasts were reconstructed at our institution using an autologous tissue flap combined with a breast implant (44 with a TRAM flap/implant and 44 with a latissimus dorsi flap/implant). Recipient-site and donor-site complications for the two procedures were compared using Fisher's exact test; a panel of unbiased, blinded judges compared the aesthetic outcomes. The recipient-site complication rate was lower for the TRAM flap/implant group than for the latissimus dorsi flap/implant group (18 percent versus 34 percent, p = 0.09). Most recipient-site complications in the TRAM flap/implant group were related to fluid collection around the implant. In the TRAM flap/implant group, complications occurred in 37 percent of the reconstructions that had immediate implant placement and in none of the reconstructions with delayed implant placement (p = 0.01). In the TRAM flap/implant reconstructions with immediate implant placement, the recipient-site complication rate was 50 percent when implants were completely filled with saline, but no complications occurred with incompletely filled, postoperatively adjustable implants (p = 0.03). No microvascular complications occurred with immediate placement of breast implants under TRAM flaps. Donor-site complications included a hematoma, a seroma, and an umbilical necrosis in the TRAM flap/implant group and six cases of seroma formation in the latissimus dorsi flap/implant group. The comparison of aesthetic outcome was statistically significant for the TRAM flap/implant group, which had a higher overall mean score than the latissimus dorsi flap/implant group did (3.29 versus 2.85, p = 0.01). The results of this study suggest that the TRAM flap/implant breast reconstruction should be considered as an alternative to the latissimus dorsi flap/implant breast reconstruction in women with a thin body habitus.     

Quality of life, patients' satisfaction, and aesthetic outcome after pedicled or free TRAM flap breast surgery

Breast reconstructions after breast cancer surgery are primarily performed to improve patients' quality of life. This study was performed to investigate patients' satisfaction with breast reconstruction and quality of life after pedicled or free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap surgery and to evaluate the aesthetic result of the breast reconstruction both objectively and subjectively.Sixty-three patients (36 with pedicled flaps and 27 with free TRAM flaps) answered two questionnaires; of this group, 53 (27 with pedicled flaps and 26 with free TRAM flaps) participated in an aesthetic evaluation. The questionnaires consisted of two parts: one study-specific part concerning satisfaction with the result of the breast reconstruction, the other a standardized health-related quality of life part, the Short Form-36 questionnaire. The aesthetic examination consisted of an objective part in which various distances on the reconstructed and contralateral breast were measured. The volumes of the breasts were measured using a thermoplastic cast system. The softness of the breasts was assessed using applanation tonometry. A panel consisting of three plastic surgeons looked at four standardized photographs of each patient and evaluated the aesthetic outcome subjectively. The panel evaluated the breast reconstruction on 10 subscales. No statistically significant difference between the surgical groups was seen regarding the patients' satisfaction with the reconstruction. In the patients' self-assessment of the cosmetic outcome, the degree of symmetry was assessed higher in the free TRAM flap group. The health-related quality of life Short Form-36 questionnaire revealed no difference between the pedicled and free flap groups. Compared with a reference population, the breast-reconstructed group felt more tired and "worn out," less peaceful, more unhappy, and more restless. The free flap group reached a higher degree of symmetry in the objective evaluation and received generally higher scores from the three-member panel, compared with the pedicled TRAM flap group. A strong correlation between the patients' and the panel's evaluations of the cosmetic outcome was seen; generally, the panel's evaluation of the cosmetic result of the breast correlated with the satisfaction of the patients.     

The coincidence of TRAM flaps and prostheses in the setting of breast reconstruction

It is well known that transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps can be used to replace unsatisfactory prosthetic breast reconstructions; however, little has been written about the scope of breast implant use in TRAM flap patients. In this study, to ascertain the range of such therapeutic options, their frequency, and their clinical outcomes, the authors retrospectively reviewed the senior author's breast reconstruction experience from 1989 to 2000 with patients in whom both a TRAM flap and an implant were used for breast reconstruction. The authors examined the surgical indications, body habitus, bra size, chest wall irradiation history, flap type, implant type, complications, and outcomes for those patients with TRAM flap and breast implant combinations.Thirty-two women who had 50 (various) combinations of a TRAM flap and a breast implant were identified. There were more clinical scenarios than patients because many of the women had multiple scenarios. The 50 combination scenarios were then divided into six groups. Group I consisted of 14 patients who had elective prostheses placed beneath simultaneous TRAM flaps; group II consisted of 10 patients who had TRAM flaps with contralateral prosthetic reconstruction (in which two implants were received before the TRAM flaps, five implants were received simultaneously with the TRAM flaps, and three implants were received after the TRAM flaps); group III consisted of eight patients who had contralateral augmentation in addition to their TRAM flaps; group IV consisted of 11 patients who had TRAM flaps that were used to cover or replace previous prosthetic reconstructions; group V consisted of four patients in whom prostheses were used to augment or improve previous TRAM flap reconstructions; and group VI consisted of three patients who required prostheses to either reconstruct or salvage total or near-total TRAM flap failures. A broad range of implant types was used, although anatomic saline implants predominated. Forty-one percent of the patients in the review had undergone irradiation during the course of their treatment for breast cancer. Eight of the 32 patients experienced a total of twelve complications, four of which were related to the implants and eight of which involved the TRAM flaps and abdominal donor sites.Although complex, the wide variety of potential TRAM flap/breast implant combinations can be useful for patients with challenging reconstructive scenarios, particularly those that involve radiation therapy. In the group of patients reviewed by the authors, TRAM flaps were most often used in successful partnership either on the same side as or opposite to an implant reconstruction. A TRAM flap was used to salvage or replace an unsatisfactory implant reconstruction in less than a third of the patients. From a risk point of view, implants used opposite a TRAM flap reconstruction had a lower incidence of complication than did implants used beneath TRAM flaps.     

Comparison of cost for DIEP and free TRAM flap breast reconstructions

A recent article by Kaplan and Allen suggested that deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction was less expensive than reconstruction performed with free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps. To test that hypothesis, a series of patients who had undergone unilateral breast-mound reconstruction by the first author using DIEP or free TRAM flaps between November 1, 1996, and March 30, 2000, were reviewed. Bilateral reconstructions and reconstructions performed by other surgeons in the department were excluded to eliminate all variables except the choice of flap. All hours in the operating room and days in the hospital until discharge were included. Early readmissions for the treatment of complications were included, as were the costs of the mastectomy in the case of immediate reconstructions, but late revisions and nipple reconstructions were not. The totals were then converted into resource costs in 1999 dollars, and the DIEP and free TRAM flap groups compared. There were 21 DIEP flaps and 24 free TRAM flaps in the series. In this series, there was no significant difference between the cost of DIEP and free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.     

A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction.

In a review of 325 postmastectomy breast reconstructions, the aesthetic quality of the result and the risk of unsuccessful outcome were compared for three techniques: tissue expansion (105 breasts), latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (47 breasts), and TRAM flap (173 breasts). The aesthetic successes achievable with the three methods were similar, and some excellent results were achieved with each of them. The failure rate after tissue expansion (21 percent) was significantly higher than those observed with the TRAM (3 percent) and latissimus (9 percent) flaps. Tissue expansion also was not as aesthetically successful as other techniques in obese patients. For immediate breast reconstruction, the TRAM flap was the most aesthetically successful technique. Although tissue expansion has advantages and may be the best choice for some patients, methods that used autogenous tissue provided more consistent success.     

Immediate breast reconstruction: why the free TRAM over the conventional TRAM flap?

Use of the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap for immediate breast reconstruction is controversial because of fear of flap loss and concern that a high complication rate could interfere with adjuvant therapy. One common complication of the TRAM, partial flap necrosis, can interfere with both institution of postoperative therapy and evaluation for recurrence. In an attempt to minimize this problem, we began using the free TRAM flap based on the inferior deep epigastric vessels. This study compares our experience with conventional superior-pedicled (cTRAM) flaps and free TRAM (fTRAM) flaps. A total of 68 breasts were reconstructed in 63 patients, of which 48 of 68 (71 percent) were conventional TRAM flaps and 20 of 68 (29 percent) were free TRAM flaps. Of the 48 conventional TRAM flaps, 26 (54 percent) were unipedicled and 22 (46 percent) were bipedicled. There were 39 of 48 (81 percent) conventional TRAM flaps and 17 of 20 (85 percent) free TRAM flaps with T1 or T2 lesions. Node-positive patients occurred in 14 of 48 (29 percent) conventional TRAM flaps and 2 of 20 (10 percent) free TRAM flaps. One-fourth of patients in both groups smoked cigarettes. Twenty-one of 48 patients (44 percent) with conventional TRAM flaps required postoperative chemotherapy, and 6 of 21 (29 percent) were delayed because of complications of the TRAM flap. Of the 7 of 20 (35 percent) free TRAM flap patients who required post-operative chemotherapy, only 1 of 7 (14 percent) was delayed because of TRAM flap complications.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction

In today's increasingly competitive health care marketplace, consumer satisfaction has become an important measure of quality. Furthermore, measures of satisfaction with treatment inteerventions are influential factors in determining patients' and payers' choices of health care. This study sought to evaluate satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction and to assess the effects of procedure type and timing on patient satisfaction. As part of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study, patients undergoing first-time mastectomy reconstruction were prospectively evaluated, including cohorts of women choosing expander/implant, pedicle TRFAM flap, and free TRAM flap procedures. Preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively, participants completed a questionnaire that collected a variety of health status information. The postoperative questionnaire had an additional seven items assessing both general satisfaction with reconstruction (five items) and aesthetic satisfaction (two items) as separate subscales. Patients were asked to respond to each item using a five-point Likert scale. Item responses ranged from 1, indicating high satisfaction, to 5, reflecting low satisfaction. In the data analysis, only patients responding with a 1 or 2 for all of the items within a subscale were classified as "satisfied" for the subscale. To assess the effects of procedure type (implant, pedicle TRAM flap, and free TRAM flap) and timing (immediate versus delayed) on satisfaction and to control for possible confounding effects from other independent variables, multiple logistic regression was employed. In our analysis, odds ratios and associated 95 percent confidence intervals were calculated for each independent variable in the regression. Statistical significance was designated at the p < or = 0.05 level. A total of 212 patients were followed during the period of 1994 to 1997, including 141 immediate and 71 delayed reconstructions. The study population consisted of 49 expander/implant, 102 pedicle TRAM flap, and 61 free TRAM flap reconstruction patients. The analysis showed a significant association between procedure type and patient satisfaction. TRAM flap patients (both free and pedicle) appeared to have significantly greater general and aesthetic satisfaction compared with expander/implant patients (p = 0.03 and 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, pedicle TRAM flap patients were more aesthetically satisfied than those with free TRAM flaps (p = 0.072). The other independent variables of age and procedure timing did not appear to significantly affect either general or aesthetic satisfaction. However, preoperative physical activity was positively correlated with general satisfaction at the p = 0.034 level. The choice of procedure seems to have a significant effect on both aesthetic and general patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. In this study, autogenous tissue reconstructions produced higher levels of patient aesthetic and general satisfaction compared with implant techniques. Pedicle and free TRAM flap patients do not seem to differ significantly in general satisfaction. However, women receiving pedicle TRAM flaps reported greater aesthetic satisfaction compared with patients undergoing free TRAM flaps. Furthermore, patient age and procedure timing may not have an effect on patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction.     

Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps

A series of 310 breasts reconstructed by a single surgeon using free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps was reviewed to see if there were any differences in the incidence of fat necrosis and/or partial flap loss between the two techniques. During the study period, 279 breasts were reconstructed with free TRAM flaps and 31 breasts were reconstructed with DIEP flaps. In the breasts reconstructed with free TRAM flaps, the incidence of partial flap loss was 2.2 percent and the incidence of fat necrosis was 12.9 percent. The DIEP flaps were divided into two groups. For the first eight flaps, patients were selected using the same criteria normally used to choose patients for free TRAM flaps. In this unselected early group, the incidence of partial flap loss was 37.5 percent and the incidence of fat necrosis was 62.5 percent. Because of the high incidence of partial flap loss and fat necrosis in the first eight flaps, subsequent selection was modified to limit the use of DIEP flaps to patients who had at least one sufficiently large perforator in each flap (a palpable pulse and a vein at least 1 mm in diameter) and who did not require more than 70 percent of the flap to create a breast of adequate size. In this later (selected) group, fat necrosis (17.4 percent) and partial flap loss (8.7 percent) were reduced to a level only moderately higher than that found in the free TRAM flap group. From these data, it can be concluded that the incidence of partial flap loss and fat necrosis is higher in DIEP flaps than in free TRAM flaps, probably because the blood flow to the former flap is less robust. This difficulty can be circumvented to some extent, however, by careful patient selection. Factors that should be considered include tobacco use, size of the perforators (especially the vein), and (in unilateral reconstructions) the amount of flap tissue across the midline needed to create an adequately sized breast. If these factors are properly considered when planning the operation, fat necrosis and partial flap loss can be reduced to an acceptable level. For selected patients, the DIEP flap is an excellent technique that can obtain a successful, autologous tissue breast reconstruction with minimal donor-site morbidity. For patients who are not good candidates for reconstruction with this flap, the free TRAM flap remains a good alternative.     

Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: II. Tram flap reconstruction

Although it is thought that transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction produces excellent cosmetic results that are maintained over the long term, there is little objective evidence in the literature to support this. One hundred seventy-one consecutive patients who underwent TRAM flap reconstruction were prospectively analyzed over an 8-year period to assess their morbidity and late cosmetic outcome.The early patient complication rate (< 2 months) was 37.4 percent, the late hernia and fat necrosis rates (> 2 months) were 8.8 and 13.5 percent, respectively, and the contralateral symmetrization rate was 33.9 percent. The cosmetic results were evaluated prospectively using an objective five-point global scale. Each patient was scored at each visit once surgery was completed. Follow-up continued until a flap was lost, a patient died, or the point of last patient contact was reached. Six patients died during the study. The actuarial percentage cosmetic outcome remained stable during the study period, with an acceptable result in 96.4 percent of patients at 2 years and in 94.2 percent of patients at 5 years. Only five patients in this series obtained poor cosmetic outcomes, with three due to substantial flap necrosis and two because of poor flap design. Two free TRAM flaps were also lost. Log-rank analysis revealed that neither patient age nor timing of surgery significantly affected the cosmetic outcome. Single pedicle and supercharged (single pedicle) TRAM flaps produced slightly better results than bipedicle and free TRAM flaps. In this prospective longitudinal study, TRAM flap reconstructions were shown to produce aesthetically pleasing results. Moreover, with long-term follow-up, it was demonstrated that these reconstructions maintained their stability.     

The outcome of failed free flaps in head and neck and extremity reconstruction: what is next in the reconstructive ladder?

The indications for free flaps have been more or less clarified; however, the course of reconstruction after the failure of a free flap remains undetermined. Is it better to insist on one's initial choice, or should surgeons downgrade their reconstructive goals? To establish a preliminary guideline, this study was designed to retrospectively analyze the outcome of failed free-tissue transfers performed in the authors hospital. Over the past 8 years (1990 through 1997), 3361 head and neck and extremity reconstructions were performed by free-tissue transfers, excluding toe transplantations. Among these reconstructions, 1235 flaps (36.7 percent) were transferred to the head and neck region, and 2126 flaps (63.3 percent) to the extremities. A total of 101 failures (3.0 percent total plus the partial failure rate) were encountered. Forty-two failures occurred in the head and neck region, and 59 in the extremities. Evaluation of the cases revealed that one of three following approaches to handling the failure was taken: (1) a second free-tissue transfer; (2) a regional flap transfer; or (3) conservative management with debridement, wound care, and subsequent closure by secondary intention, whether by local flaps or skin grafting. In the head and neck region, 17 second free flaps (40 percent) and 15 regional flaps (36 percent) were transferred to salvage the reconstruction, whereas conservative management was undertaken in the remaining 10 cases (24 percent). In the extremities, 37 failures were treated conservatively (63 percent) in addition to 17 second free flaps (29 percent) and three regional flaps (5 percent) used to salvage the failed reconstruction. Two cases underwent amputation (3 percent). The average time elapsed between the failure and second free-tissue transfer was 12 days (range, 2 to 60 days) in the head and neck region and 18 days (range, 2 to 56 days) in the extremities. In a total of 34 second free-tissue transfers at both localizations, there were only three failures (9 percent). However, in the head and neck region, seven of the regional flaps transferred (47 percent) and four cases that were conservatively treated (40 percent) either failed or developed complications that lengthened the reconstruction period because of additional procedures. Six other free-tissue transfers had to be performed to manage these complicated cases. Conservative management was quite successful in the extremities; most patients' wounds healed, although more than one skin-graft procedure was required in 10 patients (27 percent). In conclusion, a second free-tissue transfer is, in general, a relatively more reliable and more effective procedure for the treatment of flap failure in the head and neck region, as well as failed vascularized bone flaps in the reconstruction of the extremities. Conservative treatment may be a simple and valid alternative to second (free) flaps for soft-tissue coverage in extremities with partial and even total losses.     

TRAM flap versus nonautologous breast reconstruction: what do patients really think?

Although there have been many reports of aesthetic outcomes after breast reconstruction, there have been comparatively few studies examining patient satisfaction and related subjective issues. The variables affecting satisfaction are only beginning to be understood, and patient satisfaction issues were explored in a more homogeneous patient population. A questionnaire surveying overall and aesthetic satisfaction, postoperative recuperation time, and symptoms was used to elicit candid patient responses. Fifty-seven patients replied (86 percent response rate), of whom 38 had undergone transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap (pedicled, n = 29; free, n = 9) reconstruction and 19 had undergone nonautologous reconstruction. Although the median patient satisfaction score was higher for the TRAM flap group, this was not statistically significant (p = 0.92). Recuperation was significantly longer for the TRAM flap group, with only 47 percent of patients being able to resume full activities within 2 months after the surgical procedure, compared with 95 percent of the implant group (p = 0.002). Of the TRAM flap-treated patients, 50 percent described some postoperative abdominal weakness, but only 5 percent of all TRAM flap-treated patients said that abdominal weakness was actually a functional problem. Our results suggest that patients may derive equal satisfaction with the two methods of reconstruction. The postoperative recuperation time after TRAM flap reconstruction is significantly longer than that after nonautologous procedures, although the postoperative abdominal weakness after TRAM flap reconstruction is not as significant a clinical problem as previously thought. The patient-derived information on satisfaction should assist both surgeons and patients in matching reconstructive options with patients' expectations and lifestyle.     

Breast reconstruction by superior gluteal microvascular free flaps without silicone implants

The author's experience with 10 gluteus maximus myodermal free flap breast reconstructions is reviewed against the current methods of reconstruction using silicone implants, latissimus dorsi flaps, regional skin flaps, and rectus abdominis myodermal flaps. The superior gluteal free flap can achieve a reliable, permanent, and aesthetic reconstruction of the breast without silicone implants. The softness, projection, natural appearance, and patient satisfaction are excellent compared with other methods. It is particularly useful in patients who object to the use of artificial implants, are not suitable for regional flaps, or have disappointing results from previous reconstructions. Technical modifications of the flap design and selection of the recipient vessels are important.